Added: 4 years ago
From: Tsobanian
Views: 301,242
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (264)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • двигатели охренительно крутые

  • All I see of videos on the side is SU-27 and MIG-29 CRASHES. Fuckin pilot and ppl killers, are these SU's and MIG's. I guess you get what you pay for.

  • Comment removed

  • This is what will happen when the F-15's and F-22's shows up in a dog fight. su 30 pilot:"Oh SHIT eject, eject Fuck this piece of shit". Now RUUUNNNNNN. GO USAF.

  • @5xthejoy yes, you wish that. When Russia and USA beginig a war, we will know who are the best

  • @GaFrEzJu47 russias plains oops planes, more impact on the ground than in the air. LOL It kills A LOT of pilots and innocent people watching that fake modified show shit, I mean jet. LOL @ russian tech, BUUWWWAAAAHHHHAAAA.

  • couldnt imagine how the cold war would look like in the internet age.

  • Советские технологии - лучшие в мире, тут ничего не попишеш!!

  • im malaysian, and i love russian plane...

  • if there are no casualties, such videos are cool

  • Incredible ejection seat! Does it decide which direction to eject them in depending on whether they're upside-down? If they'd been aiming down at the ground it wouldn't have ejected them forward like that, right?

  • @malamagr Yes, all ejector seats have "thrust vectoring" if you wish to call it that way, they've been like since years ago, 0 level ejector seats (you can eject with the plane on the ground) and aswell the rockets under the seats direct you upwards, it's been like that since like 40 years ago, in american jets, russian jets, european jets, etc...

  • It's amazing. Given the low altitude, ejectors worked perfectly.

  • that was pretty cool

  • I always liked the russian pilots and the russian planes. The american ones seem too assisted by computers and less by man. Even if they crashed, I still think that manouver was pretty difficult and I don't think an american plane/pilot can do the same manouvers as a russian plane/pilot can!

  • Hey! Speak in english, will ya??!

  • soviet era technology thats why so fuck up,plus drunken pilots,(CHEMICAL VODKA) maybe.........LOL

  • Just pointing out that it isn't an MKI as the Su-30MKI was jointly devoloped by Russia and India and is only operated by the Indian Air Force.

  • I do such silly things when I'm playing lock on!!!

  • Russian Fighters are designed to stall in that was but at high altittude in a dog fight. These aircrafts are lethal and some of the most agile planes ever made. These pilots know that and the risks. As to why they take them is beyond me.

  • I'm a bit confused.. is Ukrainian still part of Russia? Last time I checked it was Ukrainian Falcons that killed all those people

    Look I'm not really sure what is worse..American fatty that grey/black out with a f18 or Russian Nutter that cant count how many loops he done

  • @JohnBullocks I was thinking the same :)

  • CC please?

  • you don't think about it much... but that was a absolutely amazing job by whoever filmed that... they followed the aircraft perfectly, and even zoomed out so we could watch the pilots eject and the plane crash at the same time?

  • This is not MKI. It is simply a Su 30...

  • Look at cameraman first and second , they do their job , good zoom and plan in stress situation , in america everything is sheyking .

  • @jonesy97 you are 100% right , a pilot without a airplane to fight , is pretty much useless

  • Spectacular, if only I could understand Ruski!

  • its not su30 mki

  • @Tsobanian 1999

  • This isnt the MKI version. Sukhoi 30 MK-I is the customized and the most advanced 'active' Sukhoi variant ever produced considering the Sukhoi HAL T-50 PAK FA is still in development.SU-30MKI is in the service of the Indian Air Force ( the I in MKI stands for INDIA). Its integrated with Indian,Israeli and French Subsystems to add to its lethality to fit the extreme requirements of the IAF.

  • lol they crashed it on purpose jus to show off them ejection seats

  • Its the FIRST sukhoi su 30 MKI prototype that was being built to convince the Indian Air force to buy it.... Heh! in hindsight....

    "The crash of the first Su-30MKI prototype T-10PMK-1 ("blue 01") at the Paris airshow did not help matters."

    vayu-sena.tripod.com/info-su30­mki.html

  • fuck off americans, go watch ur crashes...u have plenty of them.

  • @madedd02 Not as many as you cunts do! 

  • @stuntmanmike37 bullshit :) U have more

  • @madedd02 Doubt it. :P

  • @stuntmanmike37 trust me )

  • @madedd02 Lol. There's more Russians crashing their jets on video, (and killing hundreds doing it) than any other nation, so fuck you, too.

  • @jonesy97 Um,,, just who did they hit? Was there people sun tanning that i missed?

  • @madedd02 epic comment^^

  • @madedd02 Yep, we've had so many American aircraft crash at the Paris Air Show, it's difficult to remember them all ! How many F-14/15/16/18/22 fighters have crashed?

    Yes, we lose aircraft and pilots every year.

    In all honesty, due to an airshow error, recently the Blue Angels had their airshow performances canceled.

    Let us just say the Soviets/Russians/whatever have a special flair for numerous and spectacular wipe-outs.

    How many crashes ahead of the USA are they at the Paris Air Show?

  • @rampking1 Honestly, apart from the A-10 and B-58, the Yankees have no other lost, it seems to me, at Le Bourget in 50 years.

  • @bombcat91 May want to delete this, the Russia fan club here is going to get all upset again. But thanks anyhow.

  • @rampking1 I understand, these guys do not look very smart ! By the way to go about the US crashes at Le Bourget, B-58 was lost twice, and a Sr-71 disappeared, but only after the show (I do not know if it was during the flight France ---> United States with inflight refueling, or perhaps after a stop in the UK, but it crashed into the Atlantic)

    It is not much compared to the MiG-29, Su-30 or Tu-144 lost here " ;) "

  • @madedd02 We don't crash into the crowd. So you fuck off. Remember the 84 killed and 100 wounded in that Su-27 crash?

  • i find it impressive that the thing stayed intact and actually managed to rise up after ploughing the ground. not sure how many aircraft wouldn't have broken up after that inital impact...

  • @MatoVuc Impossible to say but all fighter aircraft tend to be built like brick shithouses.

  • @Grambo2009 How in any way am I disrespecting the people who died by saying that the pilots should have been more careful. You know what is disrespectful...? Disrespectful is a recently ejected Pilot and Navigator collecting and folding up their parachutes in the Ukraine crash with dead people and body limbs all over the place. Any normal human being would say 'Screw the parachute' and quickly run to see if there are survivors that need aid, not casually walk away with a nicely folded parachute.

  • I saw this on "Destroyed In Seconds" :D

  • there goes the tax payers money in smoke...

  • What kind of seats are those, they ejected straight forward! If they had gone "up" like normal would have drove their heads into the ground since the plane was almost inverted at ejection point.

  • Russia has to have the best ejection seats, or they would run out of pilots.

  • Gotta love the Russian pilots. I have always admired them, especially after working on a few of their aircraft (IL-62 and IL-54). Balls of steel.

  • @powerofthroughts Its not a Su33, The Su33 has only a single seat

  • Wat an ass , this video is of a mig owned by the Russian AF,

  • @araw19india Its not a Mig its definitely of Sukhoi design - don't know the number though could be an SU-27 i'm not entirely sure of the differences.

  • @TheTeej08 , hmm, i erred a bit , it is a su27, cheers mate !

  • @araw19india Its a Sukhoi Su-30 MKI, its characterized with Su-27 airframe (+ winglets and a systems operator) it also has thrust vectoring nozzles (cant be seen in this video)

  • I like those ejector seats...

  • Su-30MKI is used only by the Indian Airforce, change the title its not correct

  • This would be a great stunt if it was done intentionally...

  • @Tsobanian u asshole uploader,Its no SU-30MKI,Only india uses Mki..asshole change the Tiltle..

    and Indian airforce has not participated in france with its SU-30MKI..

  • @silverthunderable Learn russian and listen what narrator says. Then go look for more videos of Vyacheslav Averyanov and which version of Su-30 he usually takes care of.

  • easily shot down my ass.

  • Russians doing what they do best! Crashing at airshows!

  • A MKI did not crash...ever at Paris...

  • Damn... 50M $ goes down the shitter.

  • @ANimouz

    40M $

  • Couple more airshows and Russia has to buy back some sold units...

  • ONCE AGAIN THEY PROVE IT!..BEST EJECTION SEATS..See this any airshow w/ russian fighters in...

  • They were congratulating each other by shaking hands, "Good crash buddy, Good crash!"

  • @kozeel Any accident/crash in a plane you walk away from, is a good crash ; )

  • oops. those dudes got lucky they didnt crash a bit harder the first time around or theydve been dead.

  • the best plane in the world, not only ejection seats

  • its burnin vodka at 1:32 awesome ejection seats! they propel once ejected!!!!

  • I don't understand !

  • Its not the MKI!!!

    Only the Indian Air Force flies the MKI, not the Russian Air Force.

  • @ameyzhere So what? It's Le Bourget, so propably Russians wanted to present this new aircraft to the wide public.

  • @ameyzhere It was the Sukhoi beaury they fly any Sues they like, you want to bet with me :)

  • Russian pilots always trying to impress at air shows to make up for Russian aircraft failing in actual combat.

    The one Paris airshow I attended the Russians only brought the An-226 and 124.

    Too much concern in the mid-1990's that the world banks may step in and snag a few Russian fighters for collateral.

  • ass,its not an indian plane..so obv its not the SU 30 MKI..its su 27

  • I beleive I can fly...

    I beleive I can touch the ground....

    think about it night and day....

    can't beleive I crashed the plane....

    loool

  • @BRIANROX1 PAK-FA is made by 2 countries, while F-35 is made by all countries in NATO. So USA can not create it alone when they had schemes for it for almost 20 years and it is not cleare when it will be made at all! And Russians did not create stelth aircrafts... and Americans did? F-117? B-2? Don't make me laugh... F-117 was easily destroyed by the weapon created in soviet union in 60th!

  • @echasovskih F117 was not easily shot down by weapons created in soviet union in the 60's. ONE was show down by russian weapons modded by the jugoslavs. ONE. How many other 117 missions was flewn with none of them being shot down during the nights .... ?????? Get some perspective dude :D

  • Wow!  The Cobra with arse on fire maneuver.

  • I will never let them to flay again! But some how all pilot whits crashes get,s a second chance to destroy another plane!

  • какое нахуй касание? уебался что пыль столбом пошла!

  • the russians always make a mess of the Paris air show...a TU-144 crashed in 1973 a MiG-29 in 1989and this SU-30 in 1999. yeah the ruskies are the superior pilots of the world. oh and what i find funny about this video...an American

    F/A-18 Hornet had a similar crash. the pilot didnt eject,he survived reason being the plane stayed in one piece and didnt explode meaning its more rugged

  • @BRIANROX1 you mean the one that skidded on a runway? Unlike this one that one did not hit nose first

  • @snakevenom56 watch this video...i saw no SU-30 hitting the ground nose first. if it hit nose first. it wouldnt have done what it did.

  • @BRIANROX1 :52

    That is what i was speaking of

  • @snakevenom56 and watching the video of the Hornet...the way it hit (in my opinion)

    should have exploded or atleast broken up. but the main reason it stayed together is because the Hornet was designed to absorb such an impact because of the stress put on an airframe landing hard on a carrier deck every day. something the SU-30 doesnt do

  • @BRIANROX1 Well the Su-30 is not a carrier aircraft now is it?

  • @snakevenom56 well from what ive heard all russian fighters are supposed to be more rugged then american fighters...comparing the two videos, thats obviously not true.

  • @BRIANROX1 lol it took a har hit with one engine getting knocked out and it still managed to climb, pilots could have recovered i have seen a Swift hover a MigOVT perpindicular to the ground no american fighter can do that

  • The Russian pilots love to max perform their aircraft, thats why they have had so many airshow crashes.

    Gotta love those K36 ejection seats.

  • @ColdWarWarriors

    su-30mki is indian! lol

  • @Hashuism yeah this isn't the mki, it has to be the Su 30. The first su30 mki was flow in 2000 and this is in 1999

  • @jagai

    oh lol wow i didn't ever notice 1999!

  • @ColdWarWarriors Yes, max perform their aircraft at the expense of bystanders and spectators lives. Out of the top of my head I can count 7 separate Russian aircraft airshow crashes including this one. I haven't seen any in the UK over 3 years, maybe more - not surprising, they crash so much more than any other nation that nobody wants them to 'perform' for them. But yes, love the K36 ejection seats, they save the pilots lives - if only the pilots would save spectators lives by flying carefully.

  • @ColdWarWarriors They also get little time to practice, the guy who crashed in Ukraine said he usually gets just a couple of runs, whereas Americans get like 200 (so he claimed). He had asked for another training flight and was denied because of fuel shortage or cost. So when you try more advanced stuff with much less practice then you're going to have a higher crash rate, simple. It doesn't mean they're bad pilots or the planes suck, they're just economic failures unable to train properly.

  • Did he stall out or was this some kind of immelman variant?

  • Why do russians deliberately crash at every airshow? Great planes but no russian can fly them properly, fuck russia! You're gonna crash all your new T50's before they fully develop it, cunts!

  • thought t50 was a tank? lol crash your flying tank russia!

  • @ShadowKillah08 - you are correct, I meant to put SU50, thanks.

  • no...ur wrong...theyll rush it into service and crash them during combat. cuz of crappy landing gears and the inability to properly fly a plane

  • What a great possesed :) If I was be theirs I would eject before plane go down to such height :)

  • interesting thing is that russian made sistem to catapult pilot when aircraft is upside down....eaven more interesting is that americans didnt....

  • cuz 9 times out of 10 a pilot is upright when hit by a missile. and plus the russians are always trying to 1-up us and it hasnt worked.

  • On the pilot, the fact he had the balls to even try this shows he has more guts then all the cowards on this board hiding behind their PCs slaggin him off. His name is Vyacheslav Averynov, Sukhoi's test pilot at the time and a professional, and if you wldn't tell him what you're saying to his face if you met him on the street tmr then don't say anything. If you want an incompetent Flanker pilot, think of the guys who flew their plane into and killed 80+ people in the Ukraine only 3 yrs later.

  • I agree completely. Many of the other Sukhoi crashes you see they don't have their airspeed up or they are too heavy and seem sluggish.

    This Paris crash I think the pilot not just tried something .. and then died ... no ... he almost succeeded ... it it was a REALLY REALLY tight turn.

    So in my book of Suck-hoi crashes this one is the one where a Sukhoi showed what it can do ....and the K35 seat ... the pilot did an error, but then he almost was able to save the day .... I like him

  • Another "HOTDOG SHOWOFF" pilot.

    Schmuck-i'll bet it wouldn't have happened if he had to pay for the fucking plane.

    Take it out of their pay.lol

  • NEWS: IAF grounds all Sukhoi fighter planes after Jaisalmer crash

    COMMENTS: Jithay di Khoti othay aan Khaloti

  • first of all this was an su-30 not mki,which generally stands for Indian version.

  • How do you know?

    Been on the boards since 1994, no one have ever said plainly that this was NO Su30 MKI ....

    Whats been said is that it infact was a Su-30 MKI, and ..... I might be wrong , I really might be wrong ... but that it also was THE very first Su30 MKI produced, destined for India, that the russians crashed in Paris ..... making the Indians not smile so much anymore .....

    your sources please ....

  • why do u think india is looking to buy from someone else now. (from what i know possibly the Typhoon and i know the Super Hornet is close behind)

  • @BRIANROX1

    >why do u think india is looking to buy from someone else now. (from what i >know possibly the Typhoon and i know the Super Hornet is close behind)

    Are you a troll or just an idiot. India is getting its own 5-gen fighter from Russia.

  • @roller4312

    India is helping make the PAK-FA because russia who by the way has never made a stealth aircraft...needs help. and dont expect to see the PAK-FA in service. of course all you wannabe ruskies think everything russians make will enter service.

  • VROOOOAARRR-RR... Crunch!! Pow!!

    Looks like a learning curve or sorts for the pilots to handle it properly. 1 less turn would've yeilded a clean pull up with room to spare :=]

  • this had to have been a great embarrassment for the Russians, as almost exactly 10 years before and at the same airshow, same location, an su-27 ate the pavement... Great airframes, but poor training.

  • yep, great advanced airframes, maybe unstable and a bit twitchy. Maybe the Russians whould overlook the airshow programs from a safety perspective and the certify only colonels and above to do these shows .... well, you can let captains do it too if they just certify themselves to do it and have enough training hours ... we can't have the RUAF slam into our skull from above can we ....

  • oh fine :) they bailed out

  • возможно это из-за Русского АВОСЬ - зто национальная черта и в какой то степени проблема.

  • It seems to be just an Pilot error,notthing more than this. Its easily visible that Pilots tried to pull very late. The canards are trying to stop falling its nose, but finally when the pilot realised the fact , than it was too late and the tail of the plane touched the surface.

  • ..."to boost russian airkcraft export" And ejection seats "K-36" ))))

  • Can somebody tell why its it that when a russian plane is flying at air shows they tend to crash - I ve seen other planes crash - But it seems the russian are always crashing - it looks like the pilots are trying to force planes to do something it cant do - well as long as they can punch out and dont kill no one at the air show, It'll be just a lost plane

  • Maybe because russian pilots are really crazy guys, than american. Is that an answer good for you? Next time F22 pilot will think 10 times before launch his rocket at "Sukhoy".

  • I realy think they are pushed to do crazy manuvers to boost russian aircraft exports - these jets can only take so much abuse before a catastrophic failure is bound to happen

  • No more sukoy at air shows!

  • amazing

  • this isn't an MKI!!!!!

  • no it is. it`s one of the first samples

  • Correct, the Su-30MKI prototype.

  • missing canards i guess

  • this is a SU-30 plan , SU-30MKI IS AN NIDIAN PLAN USED BY IAF , FROM 2004

    but this incident was took on 1999

  • Yes this is a MK-1, a demonstrator of TVC

  • hahaha that was a good one

  • Best ejection seats in the world Yeah... ^_^

  • Not in Korea and Not in Vietnam and not now ;)

    you know it

    Su-27 is as good as F-15 or even better.

  • But didn't the Gripen piss all over the F-16 and humiliate the USAF??!!

  • @mograf1

    no F-22 has better seats cause pilot was KILLED during F-22 crash!

  • it is a MK not MKI MKI stand  for Modernise INDIski in russian

  • C'est vraiment un bel appareil !

    LOL

  • its is not mki it is mk , mki version is taller behind cockpit in 1999 india didnt have su30 mki it was mki was indian development of su 30 bought from russia on which avionics and thrust vectoring system added by india

  • Thrust vectoring system added by India? it's a bullshit. mki has russian-designed engines -

    Two AL-31FP by-pass thrust-vectoring turbojet reheated engines (25,000 kgf full afterburning thrust)

  • AL-31FP designed by NPO Saturn, Russia and produced at Ufa Engine Building Assn. (UMPO), Russia

  • CHAUD la c'est passé a 1 poil de cul, bien vu

  • Скока можно биться на автосалонах? Задолбали уже страну позорить, пижоны.

  • Такие идиоты как ты позорят страну

  • did you guys even know that what MKI stands for ???

    MK = Export version

    I=INDIA.

    Lol what india was doing out there ....

    lol @ you who upload this video without any knowledge ....

  • literally it mean moderninsed commercial for India

  • "Lol what india was doing out there ...."

    Exactly the same thing as during MAKS 2005

  • its not su-mki its a su-30 basic trainer

  • It's MKI

  • It isn't, the MKI is taller behind the cockpit.

    An MKI would never crash it is the perfect plane.

    MKI = Perfection with wings

  • I know russian a bit, and that guy on a video said that this is SU-30 MKI, so who is right here?

  • It is a MK not an MKI

    the russian for MKI is Modernizirovannyi Kommercheskiy Indiski (Cyrillic: Модернизированный Коммерческий Индийский), "Modernized Commercial for India"

    there was no Indiski

  • its the first prototype of the MKI .....this was a test bed for validation of the technologies before handing them over to India

  • what kind of idiotic comment is :"An MKI would never crash it is the perfect plane

    "????? Any aircraft would crash given serious pilot error, like the one we have here.

  • Ruscy zawsze mają spektakularne katastrofy

  • No racja :) Bo amerykanom to w takich sprawach terroryści muszą pomagać :D

  • Bit late on the round out!

  • At least this proves the effectiveness and reliability of the Mig 29's ejection seat....that pilot was only 60 ft off the ground when he ejected...I thought he was gone! Some cynical people even suggested that they crashed it deliberately to demonstrate the attributes of the new ejection system, which the Russians claim is superior to the American ones