@videogamers1414 but Germany would have ran out of resources even if America didn't join in the war obviously Russia would have been wiped out but the battle of britian would never be won no matter what the axis did
I'm not gunna even bother...Why even argue? Countless times this type of argument has come up on youtube about the Americans helping in the war arguement, even with such a good video to amuse you? Shame on you...
In WW2, we all pulled together, so we all deserve a good pat on the back for all winning the war (apart from the axis of course :P)
The Brits had the Spitfire-an excellent fighter plane, and the Germans never developed a good long range bomber. UK and US had excellent long range bombers. There's no way that Germany would have defeated even just Britain and US.
@ziggy577 Be glad that Nazi Germany lost because they were already planning fighter-jets (Me 263), helicopters (Drache), rockets (Silbervogel), super-heavy tanks (Maus, Ratte, Monster), infrared weapon sights (Zielgerät 1229), artillery (Schwerer Gustav), cruise-missiles (V-1), ballistic missiles (V-2) and don't forget their nuclear energy project. And your stupid planes? Mechanized AA (Kugelblitz). Yes be glad they lost.
the reason why i hardly play COH anymore is because my favorite nation isn't in there...the Russians ...why didn't they make them? they played a huge role in the war..or at least i think so it gets boring if nothing new is added...well ill try the eastern front mod..
@repulic5 Sometimes Relic can struggle to think of new ways to add in factions, making them play differently and stuff...CoH makes this even harder due to the fact that every army consists of the same things. If you look at the factions they are all different in their own way, the US is very basic with few types of infantry and tanks, whilst the Wehrmacht is very complicated with its pay-to-vet and multiple types of tanks and infantry. Then the Brits and Panzer Elite go even further...
@mushroomchrisn accually you can do the same for infantry there both equal accept infantry cost less so youll get out more but im more of an armor and artillery guy but still infantry commanders still win.
square-enix doesn't create this game other guys did which i dont remember... square only published it... it would be suck if square create games other then their rpg genre...
Germany was in a different league to the rest of the world army's. As seen, France fell. If Germany was not fighting against England, i think Russia would have fell too.. and same for England if Germany did not have to fight Russia.
If America sat back an done nothing, it would only be matter of time be for Germany landed on American soil. The tech that Germany was coming out with was unreal to.. god only knows what else they would have came up with to unleash on the Americans given the time
@ceebo100 Napolean could not defeat Russia, and in the first world war
Austria, Hungary and Germany could not defeat Russia then Hitler gave it a try and he couldn't do it. The weather in that part of Asia is just too harsh. Its almost imposible to take Russia because of its vast lands and extremely harsh weather. But The Soviets also had the T-34 which was actually a better tank than the German Panzer and Tiger. The T-34 won the war for Russia. but in regards to the game.. looks like WiC.
@NationalMan Im no nazi supporter, and i really cannot stand the thoughts of what happend in that war, but the truth told.. if hitler was not so red eyed (lucky us.. really..) and went all out on just about everyone.. he would have easily crushed any country on the planet one at a time. I dont think you understand the significance of how many fronts he was in battle with.. and still finding time to create new weaponry.
@ceebo100 It was only two fronts West and East. Unless you consider Africa another front. The nazis had a great army at that time, they actually did try to take out every nation but they couldn't do it they even had two key alliances with Japan and Italy and STILL could not win the war. Its not so much how powerful your army is. When it comes to warfare, logistics and timing are most important. Doesn't matter how powerful your army is if you don't know how to use it and the nazi's were clueless.
@NationalMan France was gone, england technically had some german occupation..Russia, despite planing a suprise attack on germany (then finding out germany was pre empting that.. and faild to do anyhing about it) seen millions of men surender or die.. only to fight back when germany was knocking at their moscow door WITHOUGHT WINTER UNIFORM. And all japan done.. was bring america into the war, who befor that did not care.. and had no prior intention of landing in africa etc. As for italy.....
@ceebo100 russians were too many when the usa join russians had kicked the germans out of the terrytories of the cccp,russian soldiers were killing machines the t-32 was one of the best tanks in the war tought the russian air force did kinda suck(in the begining of the war)
@ceebo100 You are correct... If the Americans sat back the allies would have been easily wiped out. but because the Japanese attack the USA (which German did not like) its caused their to be so much more manpower on the allies side it won the war German tech really did overpower anything the allies could try to throw at them.
@ceebo100 nonsense hitler didn't pose any serious threat to America. in fact i still can't understand why he even declared war on the USA at all. he wasn't interested in "conquering the world" as the twisted-around history books have made us believe. the only thing he ever wanted was the old Germany back. the corridor to Danzig and Königsberg. That part of "Poland"back to Germany where it belonged in the first place.
@shetlandwool Oh really?.. a man who killed millions only wanted germany back. Like he would have stopped just their?. Don't be such a fool.. if hitler did not try to take over, then starlin sure would have.
@ceebo100 i agree and honostly the axis actually made 2 mistakes. 1 was attacking the russians and 2 was the attack on pearl harbour. The americans and the Russians did not want to join the world war which gave hitler a chance of taking france and britan, but because he attacked russia and the japenese attacked America, the Axis fell and lost the war.
@ceebo100 And don't forget that Japan was annihilating opposition in Asia. If Japan conquered Asia and Germany/Italy conquered Eurasia, then they would have eventually formed a two front invasion of North America and would have been unstoppable.
Then they probably would have fought each other off.
What difficulty level are you playing at? Try easy and use active pause while playing against AI. It just takes some time to get used to the gameplay.
I would agree that Americans exxagerrate a bit over their input into the victory in WWII. But that is actually not only about warII, that is about the Americans in general in other life aspects as well. Just look at Americans in Iraq. They pretend they are saving the world from atomic weapons and not taking oil for free.
Anyway, the game is good, although there could have been more missions, not only those which are very popular with players.
What do you mean by "exagerate"? They practically WON the war. If it wasn't for them noone could defy the Germans - they were head and shoulders above anyone else. Except the Yanks with their dollarz and steel mills and shipyards. For every tank the Germanz blew up the US factories churned out 10 more. Thats how the war was won - the Huns didnt have the replacements the Allies had. And these came for America. Mind you - I'm not American. Havent even been there. Evah :)
you do realize that the russians were the ones who encircled the germans and forced hitlers suicide. the US did do alot in recapturing the west though.
Of course I realise who captured Berlin - but that was just the finishing blow. Germany was defeated ling before that. I shall repeat - the USA's most important input was economic. Without the ships, tanks, guns and other supplies the Allies could'nt have won. You should try reading about the battles in Africa for example, where Rommels men destroyed a couple of allied tanks for each they lost but it didnt matter - the Allied kept replacing theirs with more and more and more...
I do not think that Americans would have won the war without all the other countries, who took part in that. You sound like you want to say Americans won the War. I think this is a very wrong saying, an incorrect one. Many countries did it together, but Americans want to highlight that they themselves won the war, just like they want to show to the whole world that they can be the best in everything.
You misinterpret my words. I am saying that the rest of the Allies wouldn't have won if it wasn't for the Americans, NOT that the Americans would have won alone, because they probably wouldn't. They kept Great Britain fighting by supplying them across the Atlantic. If it wasn't for that GB would have fallen and Hitler would be free to fight on one front - the East. And may have been successful.
As for highlighting isn't it the Russians that wish to highlight that THEY won the war?
@Nebelwerfer89 Probably not, but why should they? "throwing away lives", a you aptly put it, was not their strategy. Russians lost more men in a single battle, then the Western Allies in all theaters of war combined. But what does that prove? How about we speculate if WWII would have ever happened if it wasn't for the Russians being Hitlers allies for the first 2 years of the war?
@depilator69 The Russians were advancing on Berlin. Yes the men that Americans that fought were brave and great. 'The greatest generation' but if it wasn't for Russia. Germany would of won. Because if they liberated Russia. Well, no-one could of beaten them.
@depilator69 Without the russians we definitely would've lost. But, Stalin was extremely ruthless...and starved a lot of his people and sent his men into certain death which is why the russians outnumber every single other country in casualties by a lot. I'm pretty sure estimates in casualties ranged from 20,000,000 to like 27,000,000
The red army (Soviet) did a huge part in fighting Germany. Russia then declared war with Japan after the 2 atomic bombs. Basically Russia and U.S. did it together little by little.
to be honest if russia hadn't taken the beating they had we would be typing in german right now.
Though the russians got their arse handed to them they broke the german front.
BUT. The only reason germany didn't win was because the most of the world pitched in (why its called world war 2) america couldn't have won on their own. Thats a fact. And many of these: Heroic american victories are by the hands of places like england.
Read the discussion below and see that those here who don't like the game never played it. It's not about Americans, guys! It's about ww2 in 1944! Americans are only a part of the whole story.
Talking of shit films that are way to patriotic, pearl harbour! My god, that film stole two hours of my life that I want back. It was like it just said "fuck it" to the actual history books and decided to just groom Americas patriots and bolster American spirits. I really am glad that the English are known for a stiff upper lip and not giving away emotions because if we didn't we'd be making films like 'THE TUBE' a touching story about one woman's loss in the tube bombings.
instead we do gritty films, about unrealistic gangster figures who are usually somehow loveable and all learn a lesson or don't by the end of the film.
BTW, what that American guy was saying about the Iraq government , type in STUPID AMERICANS in you tube, check out how totally retarded these guys are. the bit with the geography test is amazing.
oh yeh, heath ledger is aussie. Up with australia! (my cousins live there, I have a odd connection with that place) Also... Long live the flying spaggethi monster and his noodly apendage( hopefully you understand the reference). Not many people know about spy fox. It's not very popular. It is awesome though, especially the one with feta cheese (forgot its name, but its set in greece and has a tango scene.)
On the topic of foxs, the new fantastic mr fox film has GEORGE FUCKING CLOONEY as the fox. Epic miscast. It should be roger moore. Still going to watch it though. And dr parnassus.
I'm linking you with something I just made, I hope it doesn't offend, but I became inspired. you'll get the link shortly.
I got the reference to the spaghetti monster, true dat. Lots of my extended family are in Australia, don't know any of them though, I'm talking extended EXTENDED though. I'm gonna check out Spy Fox I'm just watching some geeky sci-fi shit atm. prolly best if I don't say what for coolness sake.
I'm cool wit dat bruv. You better not be watching star trek voyager. Anyway, vaguely back on topic...
I love SE, don't you? cloud is an emo, what consoles do you own? Psn is shit in europe, the pspgo is gay and i like metal gear. Wow, I actually went even more OT right there.
nah, TNG all the way, I have of course seen all of them a fucking lot. I worked out I must have seen each episode of each series at least 12 times each. Kinda sad...I don't actually own a console, I'm a sad pc gamer with pale skin and rheumatic joints. out of all the consoles it would have to be XBOX360 for me, the PS3 is overpriced quite frankly not gamer oriented although attractive its just too heavy, I own a PSP but when I have all the games for PC it doesn't really get a look in.
I only have consoles for games like metal gear, zelda and other exclusive shit. The ps3 slim (which i recently bought) is much cheaper, so i suggest you get it. Still slightly overpriced tho
The next generation...Star trek...OMGZ! I can't believe I've let everyone know on-line. well, I suppose that's the safest place to do it cus many people who like it also frequent the internet
I am really picky about games and I find consoles just don't do it, I'm so used to keyboards that controllers just annoy me, I will see if I can give the PS3 slim a go in store, see how I find it.
What PC you packing? and as you can tell...I hate macs.
oh wait, yeah the next generation. Excuse my dimness. I like the one with the ferengis (i spelt them wrong, I'm sorry) I think it was deep space nine or something.
see, the weird thing is that I actually like American films, like cheesy American buddy cop crap, I think its something about the pure fake cheese-ness of the whole thing that I love. but I would disagree that all things should have Americans in. In fact it annoys me when Americans get an American to play a British part, we have some of the greatest actors in the world. to not use that is moronic.
I think the world needs to gang up on America and show them they aren't captain cool any more.
if you are a WW2 buff and you like strategy games don't buy this American self-indulgent piece of shit. for some reason I find WW2 games based around American victory a little bit sickening, Fact is the Americans got there last, and for most of war said that it wasn't their war to fight. I'm sick of Americans saying that they won the war for 'us' so why would I want to play a game about it.
This game is retarded and I don't care if you disagree, don't tell me, complain to your MP.
although it was a japanese developer who made this game so seeing as the USA nuked the place they might be intimidated to shaping things to suit America's self indulgent needs.
Totally, And I'm surprised that a Japanese games developer would help to bolster America's total unwavering love for itself.
The other thing I hate is that fact that Americans live their life and structure their country around a very old mis-interpretable document like the constitution.
That would be like England Living off a document that the first King of England wrote.
Surely doing that is a silly move.
Surely Doing that makes your country an insular and scared country...oh wait, that's true
Also, America is one of the most nationalistic countrys out there. There was this hilarious oxymoronic article I read by the christian science monitor (oxymoron right there) going apeshit and saying 9/11 was being ridiculed and other retarded crap because of the modern warfar 2 trailer showing DC in flames. Well, I never heard them complaining when Cod4 was ridiculing the hiroshima and nagasaki bombings, or when that middle eastern country was being destroyed. So yeah, America pretty much care
If you want to see some crazy stuff about how America treat the rest of the world there are some videos by a proper old school investigative journalist called John Pilger, there are loads of documentaries by him, I'll link you up via messages as they will be too long for comment.
But yeah, what you were saying, totally. granted 911 was bad, but as you said, not as bad as the blitz, or in the case of France, being an ailed power occupied. why don't we ever see games about the French resistance?
America constantly piss me off with the way they treat their constitution like a document entitling them to use the whole world like they own it. I really despise the way the UK government seam to just kiss the arse of America. We lost good men through pursuit of oil, hardly a noble cause. I think that if Abraham Lincoln could see what America has become he would probably be a little pissed off. Bankers own the world, we apparently just have to live with it...If I had a big army...Oh yes...
only about themselves. Also (yes, theres more :( ) Americans are still bitching about 9/11, yet that is probably the worst they have ever endured. Remember the Blitz? 9/11 was about 3 days worth (at the most) of what we suffered during that terrible period. Wow Americans can be hypocritical.
oh my god a nother ww2 game...not that i dont enjoy em its just taht there is probably one billion other world war 2 games! cant we have some civil war games!
Agreed. This is just too much. If they are making war games at least make it based on another war. WW I perhaps or maybe based on a real civil war somewhere. different weapons different tactics.
It seems that all the only two wars that happened in the 20th century is the WWII and Veitnam war.
I do not agree with Zeitgeist, tanks are moving with the speed usual for tanks of WWII. I donn\t see why in the context of a realistic wargame tanks should move unrealistically quickly. If you need a fantasy, go and play a fantasy, why mix up two different genres?
I couldn't agree more with the reviewer. This game is cool. Even though there' no lack in WWII type games on the market, this one is fun to play, epic and dynamic at the same time.
Nice review, thx. 8/10 is a fair score for OOW. Liked the scale of action and graphics detail. A bit simplistic gameplay offers lots of funny moments.
this looks better than company of heros i mean i liked the game but i found my self getting mods for it alot like the commando assasain or something like that mod but it was worth it
This is the way to look at it, if any of the big 3 where missing allies would have lost
aus1123 2 weeks ago
@videogamers1414 but just thinking if Russia would have been under German occupation then they would never have ran out of fuel and oil etc
stevepugh100 2 months ago
@videogamers1414 but Germany would have ran out of resources even if America didn't join in the war obviously Russia would have been wiped out but the battle of britian would never be won no matter what the axis did
stevepugh100 2 months ago
I'm not gunna even bother...Why even argue? Countless times this type of argument has come up on youtube about the Americans helping in the war arguement, even with such a good video to amuse you? Shame on you...
In WW2, we all pulled together, so we all deserve a good pat on the back for all winning the war (apart from the axis of course :P)
1easterling3 3 months ago
this is from 09? what would you guys say now is it worth buying? or is there something better youd recommend?
stpvtsnake 5 months ago
The Brits had the Spitfire-an excellent fighter plane, and the Germans never developed a good long range bomber. UK and US had excellent long range bombers. There's no way that Germany would have defeated even just Britain and US.
ziggy577 6 months ago
@ziggy577 Be glad that Nazi Germany lost because they were already planning fighter-jets (Me 263), helicopters (Drache), rockets (Silbervogel), super-heavy tanks (Maus, Ratte, Monster), infrared weapon sights (Zielgerät 1229), artillery (Schwerer Gustav), cruise-missiles (V-1), ballistic missiles (V-2) and don't forget their nuclear energy project. And your stupid planes? Mechanized AA (Kugelblitz). Yes be glad they lost.
Enysvar 5 months ago
Freeze/Crash At Load
Everytime i load my saved game, stops at 75% and crashes or freezes and wont finish loading.
how should i solve this?
HELP!
MrLuca24 7 months ago
Can someone please tell me the product code for this game I just got a new computer and I cant find the case
Jwtrucking15 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Can somebody please tell me why I cant play this game on my lenovo laptop?
It says "Your graphics card does not meet minimum system requirements".
The minimum video card requirement of this game says 250MB or better but my laptop's video card has 1GB memory (nvidia geforce 310m).
Can sombody please help me, I really want to play this game.............
AtheistsAreSkeptics 8 months ago
the reason why i hardly play COH anymore is because my favorite nation isn't in there...the Russians ...why didn't they make them? they played a huge role in the war..or at least i think so it gets boring if nothing new is added...well ill try the eastern front mod..
repulic5 10 months ago
@repulic5 Try out men of war, its a rts game that actually features UK, Japan and, USSR :D (and germany/U.S.)
McGuffin56 9 months ago
@repulic5 Coh only wants money which is why they add one new faction in every game or they "ENHANCE" the game
atyabbaig 8 months ago
@repulic5 Sometimes Relic can struggle to think of new ways to add in factions, making them play differently and stuff...CoH makes this even harder due to the fact that every army consists of the same things. If you look at the factions they are all different in their own way, the US is very basic with few types of infantry and tanks, whilst the Wehrmacht is very complicated with its pay-to-vet and multiple types of tanks and infantry. Then the Brits and Panzer Elite go even further...
AmazingLarry100 6 months ago
Seems like another tank-steanrolling rts,I am more of a infantry player...
kemberliwtf 10 months ago
@kemberliwtf yeah same, it irritates me that you can just as easily get 100 tanks in this games like this than 100 infantry.
mushroomchrisn 8 months ago
@mushroomchrisn accually you can do the same for infantry there both equal accept infantry cost less so youll get out more but im more of an armor and artillery guy but still infantry commanders still win.
obyone878 8 months ago
I own COH and this game i think this is much better then COH because it's more realistic and i got this game for 8 bucks so :P
1Fragmatic 11 months ago
square-enix doesn't create this game other guys did which i dont remember... square only published it... it would be suck if square create games other then their rpg genre...
ImperialEarthEmpire 1 year ago
@Excalibur030557 pom is a self centered prick who will say anything is bad or stupid if hes not good at it...
ThisIsOurHouseCoach 1 year ago
This or World in conflict?
They look pretty similar from this review
fossil98 1 year ago
whoa whoa WHOA. While you guyz are worrying about WW2 no one noticed he gave the game 8/10. WTF? this is a solid 10
XxnathanxX52 1 year ago
@XxnathanxX52 8 out of 10 is actually pretty good coming from him.....
Belgarion234 1 year ago
Germany was in a different league to the rest of the world army's. As seen, France fell. If Germany was not fighting against England, i think Russia would have fell too.. and same for England if Germany did not have to fight Russia.
If America sat back an done nothing, it would only be matter of time be for Germany landed on American soil. The tech that Germany was coming out with was unreal to.. god only knows what else they would have came up with to unleash on the Americans given the time
ceebo100 1 year ago 18
@ceebo100 Napolean could not defeat Russia, and in the first world war
Austria, Hungary and Germany could not defeat Russia then Hitler gave it a try and he couldn't do it. The weather in that part of Asia is just too harsh. Its almost imposible to take Russia because of its vast lands and extremely harsh weather. But The Soviets also had the T-34 which was actually a better tank than the German Panzer and Tiger. The T-34 won the war for Russia. but in regards to the game.. looks like WiC.
NationalMan 1 year ago
@NationalMan Im no nazi supporter, and i really cannot stand the thoughts of what happend in that war, but the truth told.. if hitler was not so red eyed (lucky us.. really..) and went all out on just about everyone.. he would have easily crushed any country on the planet one at a time. I dont think you understand the significance of how many fronts he was in battle with.. and still finding time to create new weaponry.
ceebo100 1 year ago
@ceebo100 It was only two fronts West and East. Unless you consider Africa another front. The nazis had a great army at that time, they actually did try to take out every nation but they couldn't do it they even had two key alliances with Japan and Italy and STILL could not win the war. Its not so much how powerful your army is. When it comes to warfare, logistics and timing are most important. Doesn't matter how powerful your army is if you don't know how to use it and the nazi's were clueless.
NationalMan 1 year ago
@NationalMan France was gone, england technically had some german occupation..Russia, despite planing a suprise attack on germany (then finding out germany was pre empting that.. and faild to do anyhing about it) seen millions of men surender or die.. only to fight back when germany was knocking at their moscow door WITHOUGHT WINTER UNIFORM. And all japan done.. was bring america into the war, who befor that did not care.. and had no prior intention of landing in africa etc. As for italy.....
ceebo100 1 year ago
@ceebo100 england had NO german occupation faggot
supafly0345 11 months ago
@supafly0345
Channel Islands, what about them?
Osquar 11 months ago
@ceebo100 true. . if hitler had of taken the suez canal and been so obsessed about Stalingrad. we would all be wearing lederhosen right now.
bohs4life91 7 months ago
@ceebo100 true. . if hitler had of taken the suez canal and not
been so obsessed about Stalingrad. we would all be wearing lederhosen right now.
bohs4life91 7 months ago
@ceebo100 russians were too many when the usa join russians had kicked the germans out of the terrytories of the cccp,russian soldiers were killing machines the t-32 was one of the best tanks in the war tought the russian air force did kinda suck(in the begining of the war)
IWANAROCKYEEEAAAA 5 months ago
@ceebo100 You are correct... If the Americans sat back the allies would have been easily wiped out. but because the Japanese attack the USA (which German did not like) its caused their to be so much more manpower on the allies side it won the war German tech really did overpower anything the allies could try to throw at them.
VideoGamers1414 4 months ago
@ceebo100 nonsense hitler didn't pose any serious threat to America. in fact i still can't understand why he even declared war on the USA at all. he wasn't interested in "conquering the world" as the twisted-around history books have made us believe. the only thing he ever wanted was the old Germany back. the corridor to Danzig and Königsberg. That part of "Poland"back to Germany where it belonged in the first place.
shetlandwool 2 months ago
@shetlandwool Oh really?.. a man who killed millions only wanted germany back. Like he would have stopped just their?. Don't be such a fool.. if hitler did not try to take over, then starlin sure would have.
ceebo100 1 month ago
@ceebo100 i agree and honostly the axis actually made 2 mistakes. 1 was attacking the russians and 2 was the attack on pearl harbour. The americans and the Russians did not want to join the world war which gave hitler a chance of taking france and britan, but because he attacked russia and the japenese attacked America, the Axis fell and lost the war.
archon179 1 month ago
@ceebo100 And don't forget that Japan was annihilating opposition in Asia. If Japan conquered Asia and Germany/Italy conquered Eurasia, then they would have eventually formed a two front invasion of North America and would have been unstoppable.
Then they probably would have fought each other off.
EPICsliceOFcake 3 weeks ago
@MillsyXD geeky kind of thing
mevidek 1 year ago
@Bobert1016
Its pretty much the same thing.
But yes
america0wns 1 year ago
is the multilayer still alive on this game ?
APiceOfPie 1 year ago
Got to say played this and Company of Heroes and got to say that if you like it real, go with Men of War.!
Itoby2 1 year ago
This is R.U.S.E!
The1001End 1 year ago
@The1001End RUSE is better but I though of it 2
thecko98 1 year ago
@The1001End no it's not
MrVladdavid 1 year ago
Well the war wuud hav been lost wifout the uk
macd40k 1 year ago
is it possible to play if you dont have the best gaming computer
bomerman104 1 year ago
@bomerman104
Guess, yeah. Check the requirements on Steam...
reargent 1 year ago
ehh ill prolly just torrent it
genio5522 1 year ago
@genio5522
Then you'll miss the best part of it - multiplayer that is a damn good thing. Anyway, it's yr choice...
lavdernoob 1 year ago
@genio5522 i am downloading it now did you find link and download it?
GunJack4444 1 year ago
Just got order of war, but im not really that into it
dragon3600000 2 years ago
Try skirmish or multiplayer - it's just mind-blowing!!!!
lavdernoob 2 years ago
iv tried skirmish and i always loose
dragon3600000 2 years ago
What difficulty level are you playing at? Try easy and use active pause while playing against AI. It just takes some time to get used to the gameplay.
lavdernoob 2 years ago
Im playing it at easy, and the enemy just pwns me all the time
dragon3600000 2 years ago
Why is that ? What were you expecting ?
trulynot 2 years ago
Hey kingdom hearts and final fantasy is cool
Connor93098 2 years ago
Order of War rocks - the best WII RTS I've recently played. MoW sucks.
lavdernoob 2 years ago
men of war
edstar83 2 years ago
I would agree that Americans exxagerrate a bit over their input into the victory in WWII. But that is actually not only about warII, that is about the Americans in general in other life aspects as well. Just look at Americans in Iraq. They pretend they are saving the world from atomic weapons and not taking oil for free.
Anyway, the game is good, although there could have been more missions, not only those which are very popular with players.
Timeofblackpirate 2 years ago
What do you mean by "exagerate"? They practically WON the war. If it wasn't for them noone could defy the Germans - they were head and shoulders above anyone else. Except the Yanks with their dollarz and steel mills and shipyards. For every tank the Germanz blew up the US factories churned out 10 more. Thats how the war was won - the Huns didnt have the replacements the Allies had. And these came for America. Mind you - I'm not American. Havent even been there. Evah :)
depilator69 2 years ago
you do realize that the russians were the ones who encircled the germans and forced hitlers suicide. the US did do alot in recapturing the west though.
fox40rc2 2 years ago
Of course I realise who captured Berlin - but that was just the finishing blow. Germany was defeated ling before that. I shall repeat - the USA's most important input was economic. Without the ships, tanks, guns and other supplies the Allies could'nt have won. You should try reading about the battles in Africa for example, where Rommels men destroyed a couple of allied tanks for each they lost but it didnt matter - the Allied kept replacing theirs with more and more and more...
depilator69 2 years ago
I do not think that Americans would have won the war without all the other countries, who took part in that. You sound like you want to say Americans won the War. I think this is a very wrong saying, an incorrect one. Many countries did it together, but Americans want to highlight that they themselves won the war, just like they want to show to the whole world that they can be the best in everything.
Megasoundmind 2 years ago
You misinterpret my words. I am saying that the rest of the Allies wouldn't have won if it wasn't for the Americans, NOT that the Americans would have won alone, because they probably wouldn't. They kept Great Britain fighting by supplying them across the Atlantic. If it wasn't for that GB would have fallen and Hitler would be free to fight on one front - the East. And may have been successful.
As for highlighting isn't it the Russians that wish to highlight that THEY won the war?
depilator69 2 years ago 9
It's nice to know there's someone out there who doesn't unalterably hate our guts with a passion, I had been starting to lose hope, lol
holobalobalo 2 years ago
"You" being Americans yeah? :) Dont listen to the haters - theyre just jelous. Cant stand being unimportant, you know ;)
depilator69 2 years ago
@depilator69 Being important for all the wrong reasons is probably better than going unnoticed.
or is it..?
Retards get a lot of attention, too. So I guess that makes them more important than Joe Average.
All Hail Mongo, the new king of the internets!
ronnysoeberg 2 years ago
@depilator69 Well, you tell me ? If the russians didn't throw away 25 million lives could American have done it ?
Nebelwerfer89 1 year ago
@Nebelwerfer89 Probably not, but why should they? "throwing away lives", a you aptly put it, was not their strategy. Russians lost more men in a single battle, then the Western Allies in all theaters of war combined. But what does that prove? How about we speculate if WWII would have ever happened if it wasn't for the Russians being Hitlers allies for the first 2 years of the war?
depilator69 1 year ago
@depilator69 The Russians were advancing on Berlin. Yes the men that Americans that fought were brave and great. 'The greatest generation' but if it wasn't for Russia. Germany would of won. Because if they liberated Russia. Well, no-one could of beaten them.
HypoTurtleProduction 1 year ago
@depilator69 The Russian _WINTER_ defeated the Germans in much the same way it did Napoleon.
A Swiss-Jew/German WMD defeated the Japanese.
Sablicious 11 months ago
@depilator69 Without the russians we definitely would've lost. But, Stalin was extremely ruthless...and starved a lot of his people and sent his men into certain death which is why the russians outnumber every single other country in casualties by a lot. I'm pretty sure estimates in casualties ranged from 20,000,000 to like 27,000,000
azerskater 5 months ago
@Megasoundmind
The red army (Soviet) did a huge part in fighting Germany. Russia then declared war with Japan after the 2 atomic bombs. Basically Russia and U.S. did it together little by little.
SpaceFilmStudios 1 year ago
to be honest if russia hadn't taken the beating they had we would be typing in german right now.
Though the russians got their arse handed to them they broke the german front.
BUT. The only reason germany didn't win was because the most of the world pitched in (why its called world war 2) america couldn't have won on their own. Thats a fact. And many of these: Heroic american victories are by the hands of places like england.
Renorack 2 years ago
putchased the game after viewing this review. thnx to the author, Order of War is worth playing.
TheDancelot 2 years ago
Read the discussion below and see that those here who don't like the game never played it. It's not about Americans, guys! It's about ww2 in 1944! Americans are only a part of the whole story.
chumorra 2 years ago
um the ps3 is the same price as a decent model 360 noob.
oflow100 2 years ago
looks like wic but ww2
BlinkElement 2 years ago
WWII WiC with Total War Scale
chumorra 2 years ago
He said boffin. rofl
Samus5164 2 years ago
Thats mental. How can anyone live with that closed in of a view?
Have you noticed how rather than teaching history in school in America, they teach American History, Like its different, Somehow special.
Also, A while back, not sure if they still do but they weren't teaching evolution in schools, which to my mind is totally mental.
Btw, The Americans can't have Heath ledger, he's an Aussie and I think has some link to the UK.
I haven't heard of spy fox, I'll take a look tho.
wehatemacs 2 years ago
Talking of shit films that are way to patriotic, pearl harbour! My god, that film stole two hours of my life that I want back. It was like it just said "fuck it" to the actual history books and decided to just groom Americas patriots and bolster American spirits. I really am glad that the English are known for a stiff upper lip and not giving away emotions because if we didn't we'd be making films like 'THE TUBE' a touching story about one woman's loss in the tube bombings.
wehatemacs 2 years ago
instead we do gritty films, about unrealistic gangster figures who are usually somehow loveable and all learn a lesson or don't by the end of the film.
BTW, what that American guy was saying about the Iraq government , type in STUPID AMERICANS in you tube, check out how totally retarded these guys are. the bit with the geography test is amazing.
wehatemacs 2 years ago
oh god. I watched it and some of my soul has melted. My brain is dripping out of my fucking ear.
crazyturtlevideos 2 years ago
oh yeh, heath ledger is aussie. Up with australia! (my cousins live there, I have a odd connection with that place) Also... Long live the flying spaggethi monster and his noodly apendage( hopefully you understand the reference). Not many people know about spy fox. It's not very popular. It is awesome though, especially the one with feta cheese (forgot its name, but its set in greece and has a tango scene.)
crazyturtlevideos 2 years ago
On the topic of foxs, the new fantastic mr fox film has GEORGE FUCKING CLOONEY as the fox. Epic miscast. It should be roger moore. Still going to watch it though. And dr parnassus.
crazyturtlevideos 2 years ago
I'm linking you with something I just made, I hope it doesn't offend, but I became inspired. you'll get the link shortly.
I got the reference to the spaghetti monster, true dat. Lots of my extended family are in Australia, don't know any of them though, I'm talking extended EXTENDED though. I'm gonna check out Spy Fox I'm just watching some geeky sci-fi shit atm. prolly best if I don't say what for coolness sake.
wehatemacs 2 years ago
I'm cool wit dat bruv. You better not be watching star trek voyager. Anyway, vaguely back on topic...
I love SE, don't you? cloud is an emo, what consoles do you own? Psn is shit in europe, the pspgo is gay and i like metal gear. Wow, I actually went even more OT right there.
crazyturtlevideos 2 years ago
nah, TNG all the way, I have of course seen all of them a fucking lot. I worked out I must have seen each episode of each series at least 12 times each. Kinda sad...I don't actually own a console, I'm a sad pc gamer with pale skin and rheumatic joints. out of all the consoles it would have to be XBOX360 for me, the PS3 is overpriced quite frankly not gamer oriented although attractive its just too heavy, I own a PSP but when I have all the games for PC it doesn't really get a look in.
wehatemacs 2 years ago
whats tng? I love the pc.
Pc<console=flawless victory
I only have consoles for games like metal gear, zelda and other exclusive shit. The ps3 slim (which i recently bought) is much cheaper, so i suggest you get it. Still slightly overpriced tho
crazyturtlevideos 2 years ago
The next generation...Star trek...OMGZ! I can't believe I've let everyone know on-line. well, I suppose that's the safest place to do it cus many people who like it also frequent the internet
I am really picky about games and I find consoles just don't do it, I'm so used to keyboards that controllers just annoy me, I will see if I can give the PS3 slim a go in store, see how I find it.
What PC you packing? and as you can tell...I hate macs.
wehatemacs 2 years ago
windows... vista
:(
crazyturtlevideos 2 years ago
nothing wrong with vista...I used vista successfully, Maybe you should get windows 7?
wehatemacs 2 years ago
That's what I said. :L Vista is perfectly fine; I run almost anything on it perfectly.
Samus5164 2 years ago
no, I just don't like it because I guy in my class who I don't particuarly like who looks a bit like an orange owns one and that makes me sad :(
crazyturtlevideos 2 years ago
Maybe, the orange guy is not so nerdy as you think)))) Lol.
Timeofblackpirate 2 years ago
oh wait, yeah the next generation. Excuse my dimness. I like the one with the ferengis (i spelt them wrong, I'm sorry) I think it was deep space nine or something.
crazyturtlevideos 2 years ago
Yeah, DS9, good series, strong plot and character development, good story lines. Enterprise, the 5 series flop was by far the worst.
wehatemacs 2 years ago
Wow. That was fucking awesome. I genuinely thought it was genuine and it was genuinely genuine actually. How did you do it?
Although now I am scared because i use the tube every day.
crazyturtlevideos 2 years ago
see, the weird thing is that I actually like American films, like cheesy American buddy cop crap, I think its something about the pure fake cheese-ness of the whole thing that I love. but I would disagree that all things should have Americans in. In fact it annoys me when Americans get an American to play a British part, we have some of the greatest actors in the world. to not use that is moronic.
I think the world needs to gang up on America and show them they aren't captain cool any more.
wehatemacs 2 years ago
or ww1?
wehatemacs 2 years ago
if you are a WW2 buff and you like strategy games don't buy this American self-indulgent piece of shit. for some reason I find WW2 games based around American victory a little bit sickening, Fact is the Americans got there last, and for most of war said that it wasn't their war to fight. I'm sick of Americans saying that they won the war for 'us' so why would I want to play a game about it.
This game is retarded and I don't care if you disagree, don't tell me, complain to your MP.
wehatemacs 2 years ago
so do I.
crazyturtlevideos 2 years ago
although it was a japanese developer who made this game so seeing as the USA nuked the place they might be intimidated to shaping things to suit America's self indulgent needs.
crazyturtlevideos 2 years ago
Totally, And I'm surprised that a Japanese games developer would help to bolster America's total unwavering love for itself.
The other thing I hate is that fact that Americans live their life and structure their country around a very old mis-interpretable document like the constitution.
That would be like England Living off a document that the first King of England wrote.
Surely doing that is a silly move.
Surely Doing that makes your country an insular and scared country...oh wait, that's true
wehatemacs 2 years ago
Also, America is one of the most nationalistic countrys out there. There was this hilarious oxymoronic article I read by the christian science monitor (oxymoron right there) going apeshit and saying 9/11 was being ridiculed and other retarded crap because of the modern warfar 2 trailer showing DC in flames. Well, I never heard them complaining when Cod4 was ridiculing the hiroshima and nagasaki bombings, or when that middle eastern country was being destroyed. So yeah, America pretty much care
crazyturtlevideos 2 years ago
If you want to see some crazy stuff about how America treat the rest of the world there are some videos by a proper old school investigative journalist called John Pilger, there are loads of documentaries by him, I'll link you up via messages as they will be too long for comment.
But yeah, what you were saying, totally. granted 911 was bad, but as you said, not as bad as the blitz, or in the case of France, being an ailed power occupied. why don't we ever see games about the French resistance?
wehatemacs 2 years ago
America constantly piss me off with the way they treat their constitution like a document entitling them to use the whole world like they own it. I really despise the way the UK government seam to just kiss the arse of America. We lost good men through pursuit of oil, hardly a noble cause. I think that if Abraham Lincoln could see what America has become he would probably be a little pissed off. Bankers own the world, we apparently just have to live with it...If I had a big army...Oh yes...
wehatemacs 2 years ago
only about themselves. Also (yes, theres more :( ) Americans are still bitching about 9/11, yet that is probably the worst they have ever endured. Remember the Blitz? 9/11 was about 3 days worth (at the most) of what we suffered during that terrible period. Wow Americans can be hypocritical.
crazyturtlevideos 2 years ago
i love war games espicially first shooter
gameplayer661 2 years ago
oh my god a nother ww2 game...not that i dont enjoy em its just taht there is probably one billion other world war 2 games! cant we have some civil war games!
bikerkidnd 2 years ago
Agreed. This is just too much. If they are making war games at least make it based on another war. WW I perhaps or maybe based on a real civil war somewhere. different weapons different tactics.
It seems that all the only two wars that happened in the 20th century is the WWII and Veitnam war.
nipunaLK 2 years ago
why not the war in 1992 or the 2002 war something that is in a Modern Warfare RTS how many time i have to kill Nazi am getting so sick of it.
blackwolfone1 2 years ago
I do not agree with Zeitgeist, tanks are moving with the speed usual for tanks of WWII. I donn\t see why in the context of a realistic wargame tanks should move unrealistically quickly. If you need a fantasy, go and play a fantasy, why mix up two different genres?
Megasoundmind 2 years ago
I couldn't agree more with the reviewer. This game is cool. Even though there' no lack in WWII type games on the market, this one is fun to play, epic and dynamic at the same time.
Camarazze 2 years ago
Nice review, thx. 8/10 is a fair score for OOW. Liked the scale of action and graphics detail. A bit simplistic gameplay offers lots of funny moments.
MrRobinson32 2 years ago
im not a WW2 guy but this looks fun anyway
Keegzey12 2 years ago
im surprised squareenix made this
Richardy4283 2 years ago
SAME ENGINE AS WORLD IN CONFLICT!
imnotsickimjustaboy 2 years ago
it is? s; sad. Then i wouldn't probably buy it.
guitaruler 2 years ago
Please longer reviews (4-5 mins)!
Great job anyway!
zartan123456789 2 years ago
Great review
MrJcb21 2 years ago
It's like empire at war except historic!
greadion4 2 years ago
I only like you because of your voice, you give almost every game an 8/10. ridiculous.
Enlightenmeantiskey 2 years ago 2
You can't have seen many of my videos then. I give a variety of scores.
MonkeyFishGB 2 years ago
look at his review for G.I. Joe
Spartan596 2 years ago
British accent is always great.
Agree on the other part, his average rating ranges from 8-9
shadowclause 2 years ago
Exactly! thank you!
Enlightenmeantiskey 2 years ago
Kinda like a WWII Total War game. Interesting...
SpecOpCellBorn 2 years ago
there needs to be a other wars
like Korean or Vietnamese war
america0wns 2 years ago 7
looks really good, but nothing compared to COH
Alexfusion0123 2 years ago
*Likes*
xXMLGxMuLlEtXx 2 years ago
Ugh, Might as well name it "Yet Another WW2 game"
Swordfyre 2 years ago
looks like company of heroes
but worest
shilohnouveljoliepit 2 years ago
i understand that WW2 is one of the most important events in human history, but enough is enough!
GundamAngelicDevil 2 years ago
dude if u dont like WW2 games than just ignore them cus they aint stoppin.
GomezB69 2 years ago 9
to many world war 2 games!
rummy12399 2 years ago
ahh the voice at the end sounds really sharp and strange makes my ears feel really weird and in a strange way, metalllic.
PS3Insight 2 years ago
does every game get 8/10 with games weasel?
suckmynose000 2 years ago
most seem to get a 6/10 from the ones i've watched
Mongoose007 2 years ago
no. Guitar Hero 5 got 9/10
starightshooter 2 years ago
damn this game looks ownage
sonofa6699str 2 years ago
great review as always, seems like a fun game
darkwatch1234 2 years ago
This game looks AWSOME!!!
RJ17Boy 2 years ago
Looks freaking awesome
234jari234 2 years ago
wat????? square enix making a ww2 game? I'm getting this.
polarchucky 2 years ago
this looks better than company of heros i mean i liked the game but i found my self getting mods for it alot like the commando assasain or something like that mod but it was worth it
mrmjfan101 2 years ago
Its set in 50´s if its at the end of WWII, 40´s are 31-40 and WWII ended in 1945 - 50´s
kamoskere 2 years ago
this game is for attila or princeofmacedon lol..
i like te game but i didnt like the review for some reason... too short and with little info.
iosononapoletanovero 2 years ago
I'm not a fan of WW2 games and RTS games but this game looks pretty amazing and I'm suprised this came form square enix.
xRocketzFighterx 2 years ago
GO GAMESWEASEL
MosquitoWarrior 2 years ago
wow this looks way to much like world in conflict.
bmacmillan 2 years ago
Gamesweasel for the fucking win yea!!
Keep up the good work
nikkle2 2 years ago 3
tenth comment
FlashTutHelp 2 years ago
i love gamesweasel
the12221 2 years ago 3
that looks fantastic and i might get it. Not much to say on this one. It's a WW2 RTS. Plain and simple. But thats what i like(RTS games that is)
jaws900 2 years ago
so its a bit like the total war series but set in WW2....?
MrRCPresident 2 years ago
Second.
seetherlee 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
second!
terley 2 years ago
STOP saying first you COCKBAG
themugu 2 years ago 4
This has been flagged as spam show
fiirst
BaptistsSolder 2 years ago
add me
JaxxDaemon 2 years ago
no.
wealllovepotatoes 2 years ago