It never fails to amaze me that sensible, logical, otherwise intelligent beings will go Out Of Their Way to grasp at the foolishness that is religion. Silly superstisious fairy tales. Grow up kids. Religion was developed by the ignorant in cave man times. We know better now, let's move on
LOL!! Fantastic parody of what idiots really believe. I mean seriously, you capture their stupid non-logical arguments PERFECTLY!! Best laugh of the day! Thanks!
@TheHigherVoltage I will agree that this video does not offer any proof of a living God. But as far as God creating viruses, God created everything perfectly. There were no viruses or any other organisms that would harm life until man sined.
Secondly, viruses are not "cured" by scientist's medicines. The body must keep viruses from multiplying. Scientist have deleloped ways to help the body. Also, a virus is like bad luggage, it stays with you forever. There is no cure.
@123mandk1 So...God created everything perfect? And I thought "nothing is perfect but God" was in the bible like 100,000 times. Now you want to claim "God+everything was perfect for a while....but now everything is less than God's level of perfection."
So...how's that mental dishonesty work? Maybe you could ask God for me next time he speaks to you?
You need to look up what "scientific", and "proof" mean before you send me any more lame videos that do not even come close to doing what they purport to do.
The fact that someone would try and pass this type of pointless nonsense off as "proof" makes me suspect even more strongly there really isn't any....and likely for a very good reason.
"Santa Claus and Santa Claus is god. They are the same thing. They are the same thing by definition. "
If you define Santa as the samething as I define God, then yes they are the samething, regarless of what you call it. If you define an apple as what wh know an apple to be then call it an orange, it will still be an apple no matter what you an I call it.
"You are really going to take the position that my belief controls reality?"
If God does exist, no opinino will negate that.
If God does not exist, no opinion will negate that.
Without proof you believe one or the other. If you claim "I don't believe God exists. Then you could be saying, God does exist, you just don't believe it.
this is how dumb you sound: god obviously created natural light (the sun) because it is different from the light the humans created (a car light). its different but how is that proving god exists? nice proof. very nice. it is because of videos like these that atheists think theists are wrong. and its videos like these that make me stick to atheism more. videos like these prove you dont have enough evidence for your case. idiot
@856893tfr You shouldn't stick to atheism just because theists have bizarre explanations for things that they claim are "proof". You should do it because of information you have gathered. I have been an atheist for a long time now and I don't think theists are wrong because of these things... I think they are wrong because I read the bible... because I have life experience... because I critically thought about it... because I used common sense.
yes i read the bible too. i read my history, my philosophy. ive researched stuff. the video is just one factor that counts against the theists' position. i probably misspoke, but what i tried to say is that this video was so stupid it is ONE thing that makes me support my position more.
so just dont spam anymore idiot. i had theists' credibility at maybe 25 percent to be fair (open to debate, open to new possibilities, open to new flow of ideas) you just dropped that credibility to 15 percent. good job very good job. you have no sense of what reasonable evidence is. how about....the big bang created the universe. i think thats satisfying enough. i imagine what people are gonna be saying to you in a couple minutes. idiot
Get a fucking life and stop spamming everyone with your idiotic "proof". You just end up making fun of your stupid beliefs, just like every theist does when they spam everyone
Sorry, but I can disprove all those arguments related to life thanks to natural selection. The shepe of the earht by phisics... you see, the globe is the basic shape of things, because the power of rotation acted with the same magnitude on allmoast every point (on the equatorial with a higher magnitude). This is the Coriolis-power. Another intresting thing: the video states that the world is LEVITATING. It isn't falling because there is no gravity in wich dirrection to fall. But nice try, dough.
@locoyo386 So if I believe it it is true and if I don't believe it then it is not true? You are really going to take the position that my belief controls reality? Ok, I believe that your god does not exist, end of story.
"Why can't you just explain the difference between god and Santa Claus?"
The difference is that God is God and Santa Clause is, well, Santa Clause. It's like saying an apple is an apple and not an orange, just two completely different things simply by definition.
@locoyo386 Ok, well try this out: god is Santa Claus and Santa Claus is god. They are the same thing they are both imaginary characters that children believe in until they get old enough to think for themselves. They are the same thing by definition.
"I won't try to dissuade you from your opinion, but I disagree."
No problem there, you are not the first person to disagree with me. The point here is that God is a belief. The existence of God is for God to prove and not man. You can beleive God exists or you can "believe" god does not exist.
"If you want to believe that there is no objective reality,"
"Objective reality" is based on a group of people agreeing on what objective and reality mean, ans then applying it to different things. Do you believe "multiple dimensions" exist or "parallel universes" exist? Well regarless of what you or I "believe" if they do exist they might be known to us at one point or another. Just because we can't find them it does not mean they don't exist.
Sorry mate your title doesn't reflect the content. In which way is this a scietific proof? I can make a similar video and replace "god" with pink elephant or alien , and that still doesn't tell you any proof of their existence/non-existence.
Good points but "better" is a personal definition. What you consider better others might not. Personally I think humans are better since a human can put together and break apart, into it's most basic components, a computer and still be functional. A computer can't take apart a human into it's most basic components and put it back together. Well maybe in the future they might, but not at the moment.
How you see Santa Claus' existence is base on personal belief. You can categories his existence as real or as fiction or as a made up charter for a movie. A more basic explanations is Santa Claus is not God or Tooth Fairy is not God, unless you wish to define them being the same thing.
@locoyo386 If you want to believe that there is no objective reality, I won't try to dissuade you from your opinion, but I disagree. Why can't you just explain the difference between god and Santa Claus?
wtf? Man made or not it is god. You don' even know what you are talking about yourself. So if a rock is sculpted by a man it no longer is god made. You make me laugh.
This is not scientific proof of anything. Humans can just barely manipulate and control biological materials, substances and what not, but humans have done things with biological materials (such as forcing a breed of flowers to change colors, cloning animals, etc.)
Christians... for your own sake, do not use this. Just because humans have not figured something out yet does not mean "PROOF OF GOD!"
This argument fails in one of the worst ways. You don't have any proof. Your just showing pics.
Smallest size of living organisms are ants/insects lol
I'll promise you that I won't spend my entire life to look for god/gods. Buddha's teaching stated: "If you want to find who's made the universe and created lives on earth or else wheres, you are wasting your time for being a human".
Who ever thinks philosophy is evil, you are being evil and having hollow head.
Then you are defining "existence" as all that wich has matter and energy.
Are those not the propeties of materilistic things, things that are matter based?
Thus your approch to God is that since God is not known to be materilistic, then God must not exist. Existence is something that intereacts with matter and energy. How does a character exist then? Because it intereacts withyour sensory organs.
ummm.. wtf was that? 2 things side by side proving absolutely nothing.. thanks for wasting my time on this crap.. and for anyone that thinks I should just not watch it if I don't like it, this jerk spammed me saying "Please watch"..
If they did not exist, then you would not know about them would you?
Also are you saying that something that does not exist has to be able to interact with matter and energy? If so, then explain how something that does not exist can exist?
@locoyo386 As long as you are going to argue that Santa Claus and the Tooth Fairy exist, then I don't really need to make any kind of counter argument. I am satisfied that you want to have a semantic argument and that you don't understand semantics so I will concede that there is nothing I can write which will convince you of anything.
As I now understand that your view is that of Materialism, which is fine it is your view of existence. By the way something that does not exist would not be know in any shape or form, thus non-existent. Semantics are the basis for logic, otherwise logic would only be based on biast views.
Your definition of God is what allows you categorize God as being the same as Santa Claus and Tooth Fairy. Also note that real is different from exist. Something real has to exist before it can be classified as real. Existence is not dependent solely on being real. Sure enough you can say Santa Claus exists, otherwise how can you possibly define Santa Claus or even be able to mention him here.
@locoyo386 You only believe that because you are full of shit. Touserhk is the creator of the universe and he controls whether you live or die by flipping a coin everytime you breathe. Does Touserhk exist? How about Usdinly, Frenday, Oldasm, and Hefgun? Do I have to tell you what they are before they exist? Your definition of exist is meaningless unless you can name something that does not exist.
only 19 seconds into the video and I realise they dont know what they are talking about.
God made atoms man made atoms.
For the first part the "god made atom" is a model of the methanol molecule wich can occur naturally. the "man made atom" is a naturally occuring carbon atom.
im not about to accept this as proof of god, because all the examples are purely opinion... this video has no case. if only there was a word for the lack of intelligence in this video....
Really? Is this the best "Scientific" proof you theists could give me?
Lol. Fuck. Am I being punked? Ha-Ha-Ha.
Surely my homework about conversions is more thought provoking than this "best" scientific proof u could provide to convince Atheists that God is really existent.
2.) I am assuming that you know this to be true, because you know of everything in "existence" and all of "existence" interacts with the matter and energy in the universe.
3.) Once again, what exactly is the "property of existence"?
Are these not your attempts to rationalize why you believe that God does not exist instead of prooving that God does not exist?
@locoyo386 I'm glad that you asked, and I think that once you understand then you can give up all this nonsense about god. The "property of existence" is an attribute that everything which exists has. The difference between the imaginary character Fyorthis and VP Biden is that VP Biden has an effect on the energy and matter in the universe (ie: light waves bounce off of him, gravity holds him on Earth, etc) and Fyorthis does not. Why not answer my question?
What's really hilarious is that the book this moron mentions above, the Foundation of Modern Physical Science by Halton and Roller, doesn't even exist! It should be obvious from the appallingly awful english with a retarded sentence that doesn't even make sense, that died4hislove made this book up to try and make it sound scientific. Epic fail by lying creatard.
People think a complex working system appearing in nature had to have been designed, like a machine designed by man, however it is a false assumption: The creator of said system would have to be even more complex so what sense does the god theory make? Plus there's not a shred of evidence to back it up so what logical basis is there for such nonsense? Ths video's shit by the way
The sad thing about this is that Christians really do believe it. We need not have opinions - that's a huge part of what religion is all about isn't it? Believe what the bible tells you despite the fact that it makes absolutely no sense whatsoever. Do what you are told no matter what is right - that's religion. Do what is right no matter what you are told - that's morality.
this does not prove god. if you replaced the side saying god made with natural made it would have absolutely no effect. In your proof that god is real, you already make the assumption that he is, which cannot prove that there really is a god
It was possible for Man to create like the things that exist in the universe because Man has life, power and intelligence. Scientific method states that : WITH THE SAME EFFECT EVEN THOUGH VERY FAR WITH SIMILARITIES CONCLUDE THAT THEY HAVE THE SAME CAUSE.
CONCLUSION: Therefore all things were created by a LIVING, ALMIGHTY and INTELLIGENT CREATOR.
@died4hislove "WITH THE SAME EFFECT EVEN THOUGH VERY FAR WITH SIMILARITIES CONCLUDE THAT THEY HAVE THE SAME CAUSE.
CONCLUSION: Therefore all things were created by a LIVING, ALMIGHTY and INTELLIGENT CREATOR."
LoL... That doesn't prove ANYTHING for an "almighty creator". You just threw in an explanation and hoped people would be dumb enough to not question where in the hell you got that answer.
I set a bagel outside and it got warm... THUS, THE FLYING SPAGHETTI MONSTER IS REAL.
@died4hislove Im wlling to consider that might be true.But if by intelligent reator you mean the childish,insecure 'god' of the babble..I mean bible then thats where I disagree.
Suppose we observed two models that duplicated/created the things that exist in the universe. Say the first one is of limited ability to create while the second can almost duplicate all the existing things even though at limited size, whom of the two should we base as our right model, give attention and thrust to reveal who or what the Creator is? For sure the answer will be the one that can create more than the other.
Is there a thing in this universe greater than Man to reveal the Creator? If you believe that there is no living God, what is your proof? Is your evidence can surpass the revelation above( Man) ?
Man is truly the best scientific proof that there is a living God!
@died4hislove Why not try an easier example first? Suppose we assume that the Santa Claus does not exist. Then I take you to the mall and I show you Santa Claus, I point out all of the books and movies about Santa Claus, finally I tell you that Santa Claus only gives toys to people who believe in Santa Claus, are you convinced? How would you prove that Santa Claus does not exist?
@died4hislove "If you believe that there is no living God, what is your proof?"
You're making the extraordinary claim in the first place. We are simply denying your claim. YOU need to present the proof.
Anyway, simple proof that does not need any research: Common sense, self-realization, basic critical thinking and life experience. Honestly, have you even read the bible? Or only the verses they preach in church?
@died4hislove hey buddy these atheists dont have BRAIN,thats why there known as ATHEISTS,,,,,,,,the question is not if god exists,the question is which is the true religion of god?
what does god want from us?
how can we find out the religion were following is true?
@123footballers So you're saying Atheist means NO-BRAINER? weird, I always thought it was latin for: No-God. Since A means none, or nothing and Theos means God.
I would like to invite you to help ( through donation/ financial assistance) for the development of my project/s. Any help will be greatly appreciated...
What is God wasn't some man, some word, some belief, some thing or anything else for that matter, what if everything is as it's suppose to be, and we are just playing in this gigantic game of Life.
And to win the Game of Life is to Love more than everyone else.
So maybe God is just Love and we are just so blinded by Religious notions or structures to ask questions and look where we've never looked before.
A lot of vauge associations based on assertions no more valid than the one made in Genesis. From the same part of the bible where 'god' encourages rape, murder, incest, infanticide, torture and genocide.
Wow, if this is what you think the "best" scientific "proof" is....then you don't have a case. You clearly don't understand what is required to call something "scientific proof" and probably don't know the steps of the scientific method.
Question: Is there any particular reason why you're spamming your own comment thread?
Try responding to people's objection, rather than posting the same comments over and over again. If it didn't convince them the first time, repeating it probably won't help.
And "very unreasonable comment..." is not a particularly good response.
Finally, please don't delete your comments after others have responded to them. It makes it very hard to follow the conversation.
I agree with the first part. But the assumption about the pyramids is wrong. Man made the pyramids through a system of leveling, pulling, and .. I'm drawing a blank on the right terminology .. but it was all man made. Just like the Nasca Lines.. no UFO made them, it was all man made.
something started it all... but it wasnt intelligent design... and nothing was created at different intervals in time...it all started at once and progressed linearly. to say god created the sun, is stupid, he/whatever started with all materials we have now.
I think you should try the children s book-market it does show the comparison between nature and man I would lose the word God and use the word Nature.
With the evolution of life nature also created Love and a book showing the evolution of love would also be good.
Actually, since premise one states that our life, power and intelligence allowed us to copy things already in existence, the correct conclusion would be that god copied something else and thus was not really the creator.
Of course, that's ignoring all the many other problems with your "argument".
Ah, but this is towards a pandeistic Creator, and not one from among the equally man-made collection of theistic fairy tales -- to this collection, you must add an image of the Cosmic Background Radiation map of our Universe (God-made) next to the Koran/Torah/Bible/Vedas/Book of Mormon/Bhagavad Gita/Popol Vuh/etc. (man-made)....
unfortunately, Atheists' semantics wont allow this video as evidence... they play word games that they feel "covers their backsides"... but they will be without excuse..... unfortunately.
@locoyo386 Umm well yes, it does not have parts it does not need, or worse yet, that only serve a function to kill the whole thing. Any part of it that may go bad has backup systems. So yes, it is "designed" better. :)
And again, you haven't PROVEN anything... you're just *proclaiming* the existence of God, based on some very silly comparisons.
And while we're at it - it would seem that Man has actually been able to *improve* on some of the things that you suggest are made by God. (The heart, sight, hearing, senses, etc...) Does this imply that Man is more powerful, or smarter, or more adept, than your God...?
This video lacks logic. If you're going to say everything needs a creator you need to account for the creator of god and then the creator of god's creator etc.
I'm afraid not. Unless you can tell me what created this LIVING, ALMIGHTY and INTELLIGENT CREATOR? Because by your rationale, it was created by another, even more powerful God.
Let me guess . . . nothing created it, it was just always there?
Oh and for the record Thomas A. Edison was an atheist.
"So far as religion of the day is concerned, it is a damned fake... Religion is all bunk."
I cannot believe in the immortality of the soul. . . . I am an aggregate of cells, as, for instance, New York City is an aggregate of individuals. Will New York City go to heaven? . . No; nature made us--nature did it all--not the gods of the religions. The New York Times, Oct. 2, 1910.
the logic behind this is rediculous. humans have been around for some time now and because of this they have learned through nature how things work and in some cases have perfected it for human use. it has nothing to do with god. think of an animal. monkeys realized they can use sticks to get ants out of a ant hill so it can eat. u gunna tell me monkeys r like "god" as well.
There's no evidence that the things on the left side are God-made. On the other hand, we have plenty of evidence that the things on the right side are Man-made.
Please watch also, THE SUPER-EFFICIENT ENGINE ( PART 3)
died4hislove 1 month ago
this video makes u dumb
TheCameoAfro1 9 months ago 6
i don't think the god was around when the sun was 'invented'
EestlaneEstonian 10 months ago
lol, just lol! You people are crazy.. And silly..
theanvilcracks 11 months ago
It never fails to amaze me that sensible, logical, otherwise intelligent beings will go Out Of Their Way to grasp at the foolishness that is religion. Silly superstisious fairy tales. Grow up kids. Religion was developed by the ignorant in cave man times. We know better now, let's move on
ReiMonCoH 11 months ago 4
LOL!! Fantastic parody of what idiots really believe. I mean seriously, you capture their stupid non-logical arguments PERFECTLY!! Best laugh of the day! Thanks!
tkelley0812 1 year ago
Thanks for sharing this video, but it's not proof of anything other than someone can gather colorful photos and group them together.
ReligiousFiction 1 year ago
@Tippitapitus Dude u beat me to it, I wa about to say the exact same words...LOL
DrSAM69 1 year ago
uhh being an athiest ftw?
TheDjLee 1 year ago
huh..why didn't you show viruses (made by your god) and the cures (medicines made by scientists)?
or does that not support your case?
Oh wait. never mind. none of this is evidence at all.
TheHigherVoltage 1 year ago
@TheHigherVoltage I will agree that this video does not offer any proof of a living God. But as far as God creating viruses, God created everything perfectly. There were no viruses or any other organisms that would harm life until man sined.
Secondly, viruses are not "cured" by scientist's medicines. The body must keep viruses from multiplying. Scientist have deleloped ways to help the body. Also, a virus is like bad luggage, it stays with you forever. There is no cure.
123mandk1 1 year ago
@123mandk1 So...God created everything perfect? And I thought "nothing is perfect but God" was in the bible like 100,000 times. Now you want to claim "God+everything was perfect for a while....but now everything is less than God's level of perfection."
So...how's that mental dishonesty work? Maybe you could ask God for me next time he speaks to you?
TheHigherVoltage 1 year ago
@123mandk1 Secondly, you're right. I misused the word cure. How about "protection from viruses through medical vaccines"?
But besides, it doesn't really matter. God still made the viruses right? My comment is still valid in that respect.
TheHigherVoltage 1 year ago
I won't bother watching this video after reading this introduction's atrocious grammar.
LikeALeadZeppelin 1 year ago
How can you be sure it was a God that made these things, what if it's all just natural?
MillCityPersons 1 year ago
What kind of "proof" is that?
You need to look up what "scientific", and "proof" mean before you send me any more lame videos that do not even come close to doing what they purport to do.
The fact that someone would try and pass this type of pointless nonsense off as "proof" makes me suspect even more strongly there really isn't any....and likely for a very good reason.
blackarrow125 1 year ago
@wwickeddogg
"So if I believe it it is true and if I don't believe it then it is not true?"
Wrong, it is simply what you "believe". God existence will be regarless of what we beleive.
locoyo386 1 year ago
@wwickeddogg
"Santa Claus and Santa Claus is god. They are the same thing. They are the same thing by definition. "
If you define Santa as the samething as I define God, then yes they are the samething, regarless of what you call it. If you define an apple as what wh know an apple to be then call it an orange, it will still be an apple no matter what you an I call it.
locoyo386 1 year ago
@wwickeddogg
"Ok, I believe that your god does not exist,"
Exactly, that is what you "BELIEVE".
locoyo386 1 year ago
@wwickeddogg
"You are really going to take the position that my belief controls reality?"
If God does exist, no opinino will negate that.
If God does not exist, no opinion will negate that.
Without proof you believe one or the other. If you claim "I don't believe God exists. Then you could be saying, God does exist, you just don't believe it.
locoyo386 1 year ago
So you're saying, we can one day make everything just like God did cuz we're already doing that but on a smaller scale?
TheOnlyArtifex 1 year ago
This was dissapointing I was expecting hard-core evidence that God existed.
The1Skinsfan 1 year ago
the question is not about living god,,,we know through creation there is god,,
but the question is how do we know which is the true religion of god,,
123footballers 1 year ago
this is how dumb you sound: god obviously created natural light (the sun) because it is different from the light the humans created (a car light). its different but how is that proving god exists? nice proof. very nice. it is because of videos like these that atheists think theists are wrong. and its videos like these that make me stick to atheism more. videos like these prove you dont have enough evidence for your case. idiot
856893tfr 1 year ago 2
@856893tfr You shouldn't stick to atheism just because theists have bizarre explanations for things that they claim are "proof". You should do it because of information you have gathered. I have been an atheist for a long time now and I don't think theists are wrong because of these things... I think they are wrong because I read the bible... because I have life experience... because I critically thought about it... because I used common sense.
StainedShuriken333 1 year ago
@StainedShuriken333
yes i read the bible too. i read my history, my philosophy. ive researched stuff. the video is just one factor that counts against the theists' position. i probably misspoke, but what i tried to say is that this video was so stupid it is ONE thing that makes me support my position more.
856893tfr 1 year ago
@856893tfr Aye, now that is a much more logical stance =)
StainedShuriken333 1 year ago
so just dont spam anymore idiot. i had theists' credibility at maybe 25 percent to be fair (open to debate, open to new possibilities, open to new flow of ideas) you just dropped that credibility to 15 percent. good job very good job. you have no sense of what reasonable evidence is. how about....the big bang created the universe. i think thats satisfying enough. i imagine what people are gonna be saying to you in a couple minutes. idiot
856893tfr 1 year ago
Comment removed
856893tfr 1 year ago
Don't spam me again with this garbage! You know nothing about the scientific method.
arpeggio1358 1 year ago
This is absolute bollocks!
Wabeberu 1 year ago
Get a fucking life and stop spamming everyone with your idiotic "proof". You just end up making fun of your stupid beliefs, just like every theist does when they spam everyone
JohnF30Music 1 year ago
This is really just showing tings that you belive are made by god and things made by man.Im sorry but your an idiot for uploading this
Drogsboy98 1 year ago
You truly are an inventor...lmao
rokgill 1 year ago
Sorry, but I can disprove all those arguments related to life thanks to natural selection. The shepe of the earht by phisics... you see, the globe is the basic shape of things, because the power of rotation acted with the same magnitude on allmoast every point (on the equatorial with a higher magnitude). This is the Coriolis-power. Another intresting thing: the video states that the world is LEVITATING. It isn't falling because there is no gravity in wich dirrection to fall. But nice try, dough.
attilamarton 1 year ago
@jinxxedlikeshit
"it's also impossible for you to prove that a celestial unicorn that lives in your nose doesn't exist."
Do you "believe" it does?
locoyo386 1 year ago
@wwickeddogg
"Touserhk is the creator of the universe and he controls whether you live or die by flipping a coin everytime you breathe. Does Touserhk exist?"
Do you believe that to be true?
locoyo386 1 year ago
@locoyo386 So if I believe it it is true and if I don't believe it then it is not true? You are really going to take the position that my belief controls reality? Ok, I believe that your god does not exist, end of story.
wwickeddogg 1 year ago
@wwickeddogg
"Why can't you just explain the difference between god and Santa Claus?"
The difference is that God is God and Santa Clause is, well, Santa Clause. It's like saying an apple is an apple and not an orange, just two completely different things simply by definition.
locoyo386 1 year ago
@locoyo386 Ok, well try this out: god is Santa Claus and Santa Claus is god. They are the same thing they are both imaginary characters that children believe in until they get old enough to think for themselves. They are the same thing by definition.
wwickeddogg 1 year ago
@wwickeddogg
"I won't try to dissuade you from your opinion, but I disagree."
No problem there, you are not the first person to disagree with me. The point here is that God is a belief. The existence of God is for God to prove and not man. You can beleive God exists or you can "believe" god does not exist.
locoyo386 1 year ago
@wwickeddogg
"If you want to believe that there is no objective reality,"
"Objective reality" is based on a group of people agreeing on what objective and reality mean, ans then applying it to different things. Do you believe "multiple dimensions" exist or "parallel universes" exist? Well regarless of what you or I "believe" if they do exist they might be known to us at one point or another. Just because we can't find them it does not mean they don't exist.
locoyo386 1 year ago
Sorry mate your title doesn't reflect the content. In which way is this a scietific proof? I can make a similar video and replace "god" with pink elephant or alien , and that still doesn't tell you any proof of their existence/non-existence.
jalapeno86 1 year ago
>Quote bible
>3 minutes of repetitive shit everyone gets after 5 seconds
>more stupid ass quotes
and to top it all off
>advertising
Thank you sir for showing me there is truly no hope for religious people
sunyboy333 1 year ago
@rednecktrucker1969
"So yes, it is "designed" better."
Good points but "better" is a personal definition. What you consider better others might not. Personally I think humans are better since a human can put together and break apart, into it's most basic components, a computer and still be functional. A computer can't take apart a human into it's most basic components and put it back together. Well maybe in the future they might, but not at the moment.
locoyo386 1 year ago
@wwickeddogg
How you see Santa Claus' existence is base on personal belief. You can categories his existence as real or as fiction or as a made up charter for a movie. A more basic explanations is Santa Claus is not God or Tooth Fairy is not God, unless you wish to define them being the same thing.
locoyo386 1 year ago
@locoyo386 If you want to believe that there is no objective reality, I won't try to dissuade you from your opinion, but I disagree. Why can't you just explain the difference between god and Santa Claus?
wwickeddogg 1 year ago
wtf? Man made or not it is god. You don' even know what you are talking about yourself. So if a rock is sculpted by a man it no longer is god made. You make me laugh.
alexzracer2008 1 year ago
this makes no sense , and im proud to be an atheist goodbye.
thedominicanbeast 1 year ago
HAHAHA that is the funniest thing I have seen in a while. Thanks for the laugh.
precious014e 1 year ago
This is not scientific proof of anything. Humans can just barely manipulate and control biological materials, substances and what not, but humans have done things with biological materials (such as forcing a breed of flowers to change colors, cloning animals, etc.)
Christians... for your own sake, do not use this. Just because humans have not figured something out yet does not mean "PROOF OF GOD!"
This argument fails in one of the worst ways. You don't have any proof. Your just showing pics.
StainedShuriken333 1 year ago
how is this a scientific proof?!?!?!?!
if you are going to send me a video, send me something interesting and more intelligent. wow!
Jeanisimo 1 year ago
Smallest size of living organisms are ants/insects lol
I'll promise you that I won't spend my entire life to look for god/gods. Buddha's teaching stated: "If you want to find who's made the universe and created lives on earth or else wheres, you are wasting your time for being a human".
Who ever thinks philosophy is evil, you are being evil and having hollow head.
jonybrown 1 year ago
I'm not impressed. We basically one uped god. So why should we believe in a being who is inferior to us?
firevortex500 1 year ago
the end is spam 2:58 and arter
0123456what 1 year ago
@wwickeddogg
Then you are defining "existence" as all that wich has matter and energy.
Are those not the propeties of materilistic things, things that are matter based?
Thus your approch to God is that since God is not known to be materilistic, then God must not exist. Existence is something that intereacts with matter and energy. How does a character exist then? Because it intereacts withyour sensory organs.
locoyo386 1 year ago
ummm.. wtf was that? 2 things side by side proving absolutely nothing.. thanks for wasting my time on this crap.. and for anyone that thinks I should just not watch it if I don't like it, this jerk spammed me saying "Please watch"..
utoobbadass 1 year ago
It appears that this guy believes that Santa Claus and the Tooth Fairy are real as well.
wwickeddogg 1 year ago
@wwickeddogg
If they did not exist, then you would not know about them would you?
Also are you saying that something that does not exist has to be able to interact with matter and energy? If so, then explain how something that does not exist can exist?
locoyo386 1 year ago
@locoyo386 As long as you are going to argue that Santa Claus and the Tooth Fairy exist, then I don't really need to make any kind of counter argument. I am satisfied that you want to have a semantic argument and that you don't understand semantics so I will concede that there is nothing I can write which will convince you of anything.
wwickeddogg 1 year ago
@wwickeddogg
As I now understand that your view is that of Materialism, which is fine it is your view of existence. By the way something that does not exist would not be know in any shape or form, thus non-existent. Semantics are the basis for logic, otherwise logic would only be based on biast views.
locoyo386 1 year ago
@locoyo386 You are so full of shit it is coming out of your mouth.
wwickeddogg 1 year ago
@wwickeddogg
Your definition of God is what allows you categorize God as being the same as Santa Claus and Tooth Fairy. Also note that real is different from exist. Something real has to exist before it can be classified as real. Existence is not dependent solely on being real. Sure enough you can say Santa Claus exists, otherwise how can you possibly define Santa Claus or even be able to mention him here.
locoyo386 1 year ago
@locoyo386 You only believe that because you are full of shit. Touserhk is the creator of the universe and he controls whether you live or die by flipping a coin everytime you breathe. Does Touserhk exist? How about Usdinly, Frenday, Oldasm, and Hefgun? Do I have to tell you what they are before they exist? Your definition of exist is meaningless unless you can name something that does not exist.
wwickeddogg 1 year ago
@TheTimeTraveler100
"to convince Atheists that God is really existent."
I suppose your argument to prove God does not exist is more convincing?
locoyo386 1 year ago
only 19 seconds into the video and I realise they dont know what they are talking about.
God made atoms man made atoms.
For the first part the "god made atom" is a model of the methanol molecule wich can occur naturally. the "man made atom" is a naturally occuring carbon atom.
im not about to accept this as proof of god, because all the examples are purely opinion... this video has no case. if only there was a word for the lack of intelligence in this video....
.
.
FAIL
BlackMetalWarewolf 1 year ago
Really? Is this the best "Scientific" proof you theists could give me?
Lol. Fuck. Am I being punked? Ha-Ha-Ha.
Surely my homework about conversions is more thought provoking than this "best" scientific proof u could provide to convince Atheists that God is really existent.
Ha Ha Ha.
TheTimeTraveler100 1 year ago
I don't see how this video, or anything that have been said about it, are proof of the existence of God.
YellerMetal 1 year ago
Ahahaha. That's why i'm an atheist. Because there are lots of stupid theists like you in the world...
miregrc 1 year ago
lol fuck god
TheDjLee 1 year ago
Proof that god does not exist:
1) Everything that has the property of existence can be detected through its interaction with the matter and energy in the universe.
2) god cannot be detected because god does not interact with the matter and energy in the universe.
3) god does not have the property of existence.
wwickeddogg 1 year ago
@wwickeddogg
"Proof that God does not exist"
1.) What exactly is the "property of existence".
2.) I am assuming that you know this to be true, because you know of everything in "existence" and all of "existence" interacts with the matter and energy in the universe.
3.) Once again, what exactly is the "property of existence"?
Are these not your attempts to rationalize why you believe that God does not exist instead of prooving that God does not exist?
locoyo386 1 year ago
@locoyo386 I'm glad that you asked, and I think that once you understand then you can give up all this nonsense about god. The "property of existence" is an attribute that everything which exists has. The difference between the imaginary character Fyorthis and VP Biden is that VP Biden has an effect on the energy and matter in the universe (ie: light waves bounce off of him, gravity holds him on Earth, etc) and Fyorthis does not. Why not answer my question?
wwickeddogg 1 year ago
What's really hilarious is that the book this moron mentions above, the Foundation of Modern Physical Science by Halton and Roller, doesn't even exist! It should be obvious from the appallingly awful english with a retarded sentence that doesn't even make sense, that died4hislove made this book up to try and make it sound scientific. Epic fail by lying creatard.
alien8ted 1 year ago
If this mindless series of blind and bland assertions is really the 'best evidence' of god you have, seriously, you are well and truly fucked!
alien8ted 1 year ago
How do you presume to know what something made by a god would look like?
Personal incredulity is only a reason to inquire further, not a reason to say that you know what is behind the thing that amazes you.
You have man's perspective so you see the moon as a satellite that only an intelligence would devise.
Puhhhleeeze.
yankinCanada 1 year ago
People think a complex working system appearing in nature had to have been designed, like a machine designed by man, however it is a false assumption: The creator of said system would have to be even more complex so what sense does the god theory make? Plus there's not a shred of evidence to back it up so what logical basis is there for such nonsense? Ths video's shit by the way
Lan5in6 1 year ago
Not only is your evidence for god lame, but it seems that god isn't the only SCAM you're running, is it?
AtheistToothFairy 1 year ago
The sad thing about this is that Christians really do believe it. We need not have opinions - that's a huge part of what religion is all about isn't it? Believe what the bible tells you despite the fact that it makes absolutely no sense whatsoever. Do what you are told no matter what is right - that's religion. Do what is right no matter what you are told - that's morality.
MultiRoydon 1 year ago
i love this video God ruls! ! !
202tyree 1 year ago
Well how do you KNOW that all that stuff was MADE by GOD?
NorthCitySider 1 year ago
Bad argument, it tells us nothing. You just make a bunch of assumptions. Sorry bub.
LeonardBoobles 1 year ago
Lol..another video on Why people laugh at creationists!
It was ZEUS who made all that!
:D
transtlantic 1 year ago
this does not prove god. if you replaced the side saying god made with natural made it would have absolutely no effect. In your proof that god is real, you already make the assumption that he is, which cannot prove that there really is a god
123Peat1 1 year ago
It was possible for Man to create like the things that exist in the universe because Man has life, power and intelligence. Scientific method states that : WITH THE SAME EFFECT EVEN THOUGH VERY FAR WITH SIMILARITIES CONCLUDE THAT THEY HAVE THE SAME CAUSE.
CONCLUSION: Therefore all things were created by a LIVING, ALMIGHTY and INTELLIGENT CREATOR.
............ Engr. TABAG ( author/ inventor)
died4hislove 1 year ago
@died4hislove "WITH THE SAME EFFECT EVEN THOUGH VERY FAR WITH SIMILARITIES CONCLUDE THAT THEY HAVE THE SAME CAUSE.
CONCLUSION: Therefore all things were created by a LIVING, ALMIGHTY and INTELLIGENT CREATOR."
LoL... That doesn't prove ANYTHING for an "almighty creator". You just threw in an explanation and hoped people would be dumb enough to not question where in the hell you got that answer.
I set a bagel outside and it got warm... THUS, THE FLYING SPAGHETTI MONSTER IS REAL.
StainedShuriken333 1 year ago
@died4hislove lol if god is almighty, can he make a rock he can not lift?
l4mp13 1 year ago
@died4hislove Im wlling to consider that might be true.But if by intelligent reator you mean the childish,insecure 'god' of the babble..I mean bible then thats where I disagree.
b1150 1 year ago
Suppose we observed two models that duplicated/created the things that exist in the universe. Say the first one is of limited ability to create while the second can almost duplicate all the existing things even though at limited size, whom of the two should we base as our right model, give attention and thrust to reveal who or what the Creator is? For sure the answer will be the one that can create more than the other.
died4hislove 1 year ago
Is there a thing in this universe greater than Man to reveal the Creator? If you believe that there is no living God, what is your proof? Is your evidence can surpass the revelation above( Man) ?
Man is truly the best scientific proof that there is a living God!
................. Engr. TABAG ( Author/ Inventor)
died4hislove 1 year ago
@died4hislove Why not try an easier example first? Suppose we assume that the Santa Claus does not exist. Then I take you to the mall and I show you Santa Claus, I point out all of the books and movies about Santa Claus, finally I tell you that Santa Claus only gives toys to people who believe in Santa Claus, are you convinced? How would you prove that Santa Claus does not exist?
wwickeddogg 1 year ago
@died4hislove "If you believe that there is no living God, what is your proof?"
You're making the extraordinary claim in the first place. We are simply denying your claim. YOU need to present the proof.
Anyway, simple proof that does not need any research: Common sense, self-realization, basic critical thinking and life experience. Honestly, have you even read the bible? Or only the verses they preach in church?
StainedShuriken333 1 year ago
@died4hislove
"Man is truly the best scientific proof that there is a living God!"
You forgot to mention a bunch of malnourished babies with birth defects and disease.
olyfag 1 year ago
@died4hislove hey buddy these atheists dont have BRAIN,thats why there known as ATHEISTS,,,,,,,,the question is not if god exists,the question is which is the true religion of god?
what does god want from us?
how can we find out the religion were following is true?
123footballers 1 year ago
@123footballers So you're saying Atheist means NO-BRAINER? weird, I always thought it was latin for: No-God. Since A means none, or nothing and Theos means God.
TheOnlyArtifex 1 year ago
i think you mean 'naturally occurring' on the left side
goemon9378 1 year ago
Scams are awesome.
tkpenalty 1 year ago
@died4hislove you need to learn simple scientific method + simple logic + get an IQ test.
tkpenalty 1 year ago
Circular logic at its best!!!
tkpenalty 1 year ago
God made Justin Timberlake?
I smell Poe's Law.
romainechester 1 year ago
I would like to invite you to help ( through donation/ financial assistance) for the development of my project/s. Any help will be greatly appreciated...
Then why not ask God...
Please don't contact me again. Ciao!
pinoyatheist 1 year ago
A beaver can create a dam, but it doesn't need a god.
pinoyatheist 1 year ago
Very, very good video. So simple even an atheist can manage to get confused!
emptywithoutjesus 1 year ago
religion is bullshit, and this is nothing but fundy propaganda. yawn.
milkmankennedy 1 year ago
This hereby proves the existence of Flying Spaghetti Monster.
alexkram 1 year ago
I don't understand how this proves anything...
:|
Sqirril 1 year ago
There is scientific proof that we all share a higher conciousness, that are intelligence lives on after we pass. The proof is evolution.
pittyshants 1 year ago
The Bible says that humans are made of dirt.
And that snakes and donkeys talk.
And that insects have 4 legs.
And that bats are birds.
And that the earth is flat.
And that the sun revolves around the earth.
And that Pi = 3 rather than 3.1416...
And that animals appeared AFTER man but BEFORE woman.
Gee, I just can't wait for the new discoveries
that will prove THESE to be true!
Imaginefree69 1 year ago
The earth does NOT hang on nothing (Job 26:7);
it is hurtling around the sun at 30 kilometres per second.
Nor is it sitting motionless (Psalms 93:1),
upon pillars (1 Samuel 2:8)
nor upon foundations (Job 38:4, 6),
nor does it have four corners (Isaiah 11:12).
More scientific nonsense from the Inerrant Bible.
Imaginefree69 1 year ago 6
@Imaginefree69 watchout, don't try to make too much sense, my last comment magically dissappeared !!!
theskepticsskeptic 1 year ago
Yes, censorship has ever been the hallmark of tyranny.
Imaginefree69 1 year ago
looks to me like, best scientific proof that man created god in his image !!!
theskepticsskeptic 2 years ago
its all up to chance
BRDfrmthafiveotree 2 years ago
What is God wasn't some man, some word, some belief, some thing or anything else for that matter, what if everything is as it's suppose to be, and we are just playing in this gigantic game of Life.
And to win the Game of Life is to Love more than everyone else.
So maybe God is just Love and we are just so blinded by Religious notions or structures to ask questions and look where we've never looked before.
Inside our minds.
bigsteelguy 2 years ago
cool. Scott (BUG)
believersunderground 2 years ago
First, There is nothing christian about charging $35k for a book.
Second there is no science in this vid what so ever.
Existence doesnt prove god. Only god can do that
TheLoadedQuestion 2 years ago
This is not even anything close to proof. What kind of fraudulent PM was sent to me?
ytben26 2 years ago
A lot of vauge associations based on assertions no more valid than the one made in Genesis. From the same part of the bible where 'god' encourages rape, murder, incest, infanticide, torture and genocide.
ginganz13 2 years ago 2
Assumption
Assertion
Confirmation bias
Wow, if this is what you think the "best" scientific "proof" is....then you don't have a case. You clearly don't understand what is required to call something "scientific proof" and probably don't know the steps of the scientific method.
Please don't spam me with crap like this again.
KingHeathen 2 years ago 22
@KingHeathen I couldn't agree with you more. Blocking this guy will stop the spam.
arpeggio1358 1 year ago
And the Man Made stuff is still not possible WITHOUT the God Made stuff :) GOD wins every time.
hootyhaha 2 years ago
Question: Is there any particular reason why you're spamming your own comment thread?
Try responding to people's objection, rather than posting the same comments over and over again. If it didn't convince them the first time, repeating it probably won't help.
And "very unreasonable comment..." is not a particularly good response.
Finally, please don't delete your comments after others have responded to them. It makes it very hard to follow the conversation.
YourXavier 2 years ago
We used all of God's things to make our stuff. He did not use any of our stuff to make his.
Also you are assuming that man made the pyramids. Cool video though..
pincerpal 2 years ago
@pincerpal
"We used all of God's things to make our stuff. He did not use any of our stuff to make his." - you will first need prove a god exists.
"Also you are assuming that man made the pyramids" - yes, because we have evidence of this...do you have evidence osmething else made them?
types10000 2 years ago
I agree with the first part. But the assumption about the pyramids is wrong. Man made the pyramids through a system of leveling, pulling, and .. I'm drawing a blank on the right terminology .. but it was all man made. Just like the Nasca Lines.. no UFO made them, it was all man made.
hootyhaha 2 years ago
and you make the logical fallacy of assuming there IS A GOD.
jaebaeli 2 years ago
@died4hislove
what on earth are you trying to say, and try to use actual English this time.
types10000 2 years ago
Fair enough.
I did an inquiry on every other major search engine I could think of, and once again the only relevant link is this video.
Your "foundation" in question must have a hard time being taken seriously when by all accounts IT DOESN'T EXIST.
Vorhias 2 years ago
@died4hislove
what makes you think that whatever created this universe is intelligent?
lutherhans 2 years ago
something started it all... but it wasnt intelligent design... and nothing was created at different intervals in time...it all started at once and progressed linearly. to say god created the sun, is stupid, he/whatever started with all materials we have now.
THATS WHY IM A DEIST
lutherhans 2 years ago
I think you should try the children s book-market it does show the comparison between nature and man I would lose the word God and use the word Nature.
With the evolution of life nature also created Love and a book showing the evolution of love would also be good.
I'd buy that one.
petebax1 2 years ago
Oh, you satire puppets you :p
Stirring the pot for a chance to see what its like on the other side.
SuperAtheistBrothers 2 years ago
Actually, since premise one states that our life, power and intelligence allowed us to copy things already in existence, the correct conclusion would be that god copied something else and thus was not really the creator.
Of course, that's ignoring all the many other problems with your "argument".
YourXavier 2 years ago
@YourXavier YAY!!!
lutherhans 2 years ago
God created the interwebs, and youtube, and the downrate button, so I shall use all of Gods creations.
iDeist 2 years ago 2
Ah, but this is towards a pandeistic Creator, and not one from among the equally man-made collection of theistic fairy tales -- to this collection, you must add an image of the Cosmic Background Radiation map of our Universe (God-made) next to the Koran/Torah/Bible/Vedas/Book of Mormon/Bhagavad Gita/Popol Vuh/etc. (man-made)....
PanDeism 2 years ago
Nice video!
evangelical1 2 years ago
I think its funny how the representative of all divinely created musical artists is Justin Timberlake!
evangelical1 2 years ago
Wanna freak these people out!
Show them some facts and evidences
Atheists Hate facts !
&^O
katdanmo 2 years ago
This video shows that we copy God in everything we do. What a great role model God is,and thanks to the scientific method real truths are found.
Science,and God really do go hand,and hand.
DeistReality 2 years ago
you should delete this rubbish.
kintarocrab 2 years ago
unfortunately, Atheists' semantics wont allow this video as evidence... they play word games that they feel "covers their backsides"... but they will be without excuse..... unfortunately.
CapnnOrdinary 2 years ago
lmfao, evidence, lol.
chuckawobbly 2 years ago
and this proves god's existence how?
i think the only thing this video proves is that we've taken the things "god has made" and improved them (a few exceptions, of course)
ThatWeirdKid3 2 years ago
worst argument ever. Most of the comparisons were IMPROVEMENTS of god's "design". so we are already better than god, so who needs him....lol
rednecktrucker1969 2 years ago 12
@rednecktrucker1969
I guess the computer is a better invention then a Human.
locoyo386 1 year ago
@locoyo386 Umm well yes, it does not have parts it does not need, or worse yet, that only serve a function to kill the whole thing. Any part of it that may go bad has backup systems. So yes, it is "designed" better. :)
rednecktrucker1969 1 year ago
in genesis god says that there are multiple gods
"let US make man in OUR image after OUR likeness"
Blazikenrjcf 2 years ago 2
And again, you haven't PROVEN anything... you're just *proclaiming* the existence of God, based on some very silly comparisons.
And while we're at it - it would seem that Man has actually been able to *improve* on some of the things that you suggest are made by God. (The heart, sight, hearing, senses, etc...) Does this imply that Man is more powerful, or smarter, or more adept, than your God...?
SparkyLen 2 years ago 2
edison was an atheist.....
dino615 2 years ago
Good video. Wrong conclusion.
BiteHunter 2 years ago
This video lacks logic. If you're going to say everything needs a creator you need to account for the creator of god and then the creator of god's creator etc.
LastOptionPils 2 years ago
I'm afraid not. Unless you can tell me what created this LIVING, ALMIGHTY and INTELLIGENT CREATOR? Because by your rationale, it was created by another, even more powerful God.
Let me guess . . . nothing created it, it was just always there?
Th1sWasATriumph 2 years ago
FAIL!
Oh and for the record Thomas A. Edison was an atheist.
"So far as religion of the day is concerned, it is a damned fake... Religion is all bunk."
I cannot believe in the immortality of the soul. . . . I am an aggregate of cells, as, for instance, New York City is an aggregate of individuals. Will New York City go to heaven? . . No; nature made us--nature did it all--not the gods of the religions. The New York Times, Oct. 2, 1910.
Do not sully his name with you videos again!
caveman73 2 years ago 2
This video is fail
Sqirril 2 years ago
I echo sora201.
You need a dictionary.
Man never creates anything. Man exploits natural phenomena. Nothing more. Try to get God somewhere else.
themanofearth 2 years ago
if you call this proof i think you need a dictionary.
sora201 2 years ago
Here is a little hint: If you don't want people to laugh at this stuff, do not send it to people like me.
dangerouslytalented 2 years ago
I don't throw around the word "stupid" casually. It's overused. But this is not only stupid, it's ridiculously stupid.
hairyreasoner 2 years ago 2
the logic behind this is rediculous. humans have been around for some time now and because of this they have learned through nature how things work and in some cases have perfected it for human use. it has nothing to do with god. think of an animal. monkeys realized they can use sticks to get ants out of a ant hill so it can eat. u gunna tell me monkeys r like "god" as well.
Grim58666 2 years ago
@died4hislove
Invalid logic. "A means B" does not imply "B means A."
shanedk 2 years ago
0:31 - That isn't electricity on the right; it's burning acetylene. No electricity involved in the process whatsoever.
shanedk 2 years ago
There's no evidence that the things on the left side are God-made. On the other hand, we have plenty of evidence that the things on the right side are Man-made.
Mattmon2 2 years ago
Simple, easily refuted garbage.
intruder313 2 years ago 3
this is so full of fail it's a win
LJonesy2 2 years ago 3
there is no proof wtf..
juni172 2 years ago
OBSERVATION:
It was possible for Man to create the things that exist in the universe because Man have LIFE, POWER and INTELLIGENCE.
Scientific Method states that: WITH THE SAME EFFECT EVEN THOUGH VERY FAR WITH SIMILARITIES CONCLUDE THAT THEY HAVE THE SAME CAUSE
CONCLUSION:
Therefore, all things were created by a LIVING, ALMIGHTY, and INTELLIGENT CREATOR.
..................... Engr. TABAG ( Author)
died4hislove 2 years ago
OBSERVATION: You're a a very simple minded fellow.
Common sense dictates you haven't even the first clue about what you're talking about.
CONCLUSION: Ignore anything this idiot says except for lols.
BooMeRLiNSKi 2 years ago 3