The fake planes in both CNN/Hezarkhani and ABC/Fairbanks were pretty sloppy looking. As for the destruction of the Towers one wonders why there wasn't more damage to the "bathtub" foundation beneath them. Wouldn't the weight of all that concrete rubble and steel have ruptured the foundation and caused massive flooding in Manhattan ? They were blown to Kingdom Come but who knows how ? So much dust and powder but apparently not much solid rubble left relative to their size.
you mean the thousands of people who had their eyes glued to the big screens dotted around new york , because their view was restricted by tall buildings that fill manhatton
the so called planes were travelling at over 500mph ...how much of a view will you get of a plane when it's traveling at 500mph+ when you are looking up between tall buildings......NOT MUCH
@smoketweed09 I'm not able to accept that thousands of people hallucinated seeing the planes fly into the towers that day. It's too big a stretch for me.
@ostralopithicus you mean the thousands of people who had their eyes glued to the big screens dotted around new york , because their view was restricted by tall buildings that fill manhatton
the so called planes were travelling at over 500mph ...how much of a view will you get of a plane when it's traveling at 500mph+ when you are looking up between tall buildings......NOT MUCH
The evidence is not that slim as it appears to be. We already know this "explosion" is a complete fabrication. Extending this into a scale-model slow-motion Hollywood-trick to make it more apparent. The clue is that when the
explosion is wrong, all "interesting" clips and still photo, that show the "explosion" is also known to be wrong. ... and that is not that small!
The source is \ABC on the Day of 911\ABC_911_2of6.avi from the "ABC on the Day of 911" torrent, that I send to you if you return an e-mail address, so I can attach it.
It is well known, and is on a U-tube video youtube.com watch?v=qCbfXv2d4Xw
If you loop the video you may discover that different parts are not attached to each other....
Nice job. Correct conclusion; everything was faked.
CNN911Fakes 6 months ago
The fake planes in both CNN/Hezarkhani and ABC/Fairbanks were pretty sloppy looking. As for the destruction of the Towers one wonders why there wasn't more damage to the "bathtub" foundation beneath them. Wouldn't the weight of all that concrete rubble and steel have ruptured the foundation and caused massive flooding in Manhattan ? They were blown to Kingdom Come but who knows how ? So much dust and powder but apparently not much solid rubble left relative to their size.
SaiGirl 4 months ago
The video ends at 9:11 0_o
eslja 1 year ago
you mean the thousands of people who had their eyes glued to the big screens dotted around new york , because their view was restricted by tall buildings that fill manhatton
the so called planes were travelling at over 500mph ...how much of a view will you get of a plane when it's traveling at 500mph+ when you are looking up between tall buildings......NOT MUCH
smoketweed09 1 year ago
@smoketweed09 I'm not able to accept that thousands of people hallucinated seeing the planes fly into the towers that day. It's too big a stretch for me.
ostralopithicus 1 year ago
@ostralopithicus you mean the thousands of people who had their eyes glued to the big screens dotted around new york , because their view was restricted by tall buildings that fill manhatton
the so called planes were travelling at over 500mph ...how much of a view will you get of a plane when it's traveling at 500mph+ when you are looking up between tall buildings......NOT MUCH
smoketweed09 1 year ago
@ostralopithicus
Simple. They didn't. It is a lie that there are eye witnesses.
Tufa911 1 year ago
@Tufa911 Please explain. So far as I recall from my visit to NYC, it's full of people. Maybe you can shed some light when I see only darkness.
ostralopithicus 1 year ago
@ostralopithicus
The evidence is not that slim as it appears to be. We already know this "explosion" is a complete fabrication. Extending this into a scale-model slow-motion Hollywood-trick to make it more apparent. The clue is that when the
explosion is wrong, all "interesting" clips and still photo, that show the "explosion" is also known to be wrong. ... and that is not that small!
(it took 5 months producing the thing)
Tufa911 1 year ago
Sorry, but I don't get the point of the video. You are only claiming that videos are fake. Not proving it.
P.S. I pretty much believe, that 9/11 was a psyop.
LithuanianGuitar 1 year ago
0:44 - that picture with the engine and pilots headphones is alleged from a book by NYPD:
Above Hallowed Ground: A Photographic Record of September 11, 2001
Photographers of the New York City Police Department (Author), Christopher Sweet (Author), David Fitzpatrick (Author), Gregory Semendinger (Author)
elbuggo 1 year ago
The source is \ABC on the Day of 911\ABC_911_2of6.avi from the "ABC on the Day of 911" torrent, that I send to you if you return an e-mail address, so I can attach it.
It is well known, and is on a U-tube video youtube.com watch?v=qCbfXv2d4Xw
If you loop the video you may discover that different parts are not attached to each other....
Tufa911 1 year ago
... and the server removed the Question ...!!
Tufa911 1 year ago
@Tufa911
I would like to add that the plane+tower collision cannot destroy the Tower,
this is physically impossible. A plane can only damage the tower.
The "fall" of the Towers are also physically impossible.
So ALL the videos MUST be fake, no matter if the look good or not!
Tufa911 1 year ago
Comment removed
elbuggo 1 year ago