YouTube - Broadcast Yourself.

This has been flagged as spam show

I'm against the Protect IP Act as written. If it passes, then it will be more difficult for diabetics to import the natural pork & beef insulin that they need for survival and quality of life. Eli Lilly stated that rDNA synthetic human insulin wouldn't work for some diabetics and rDNA human insulin is the only insulin available in America. Why isn't natural pork & beef insulin protected by the "Orphan Drug Act"? Pork & Beef insulin should be available to American diabetics again.

naturalinsulin 3 weeks ago

Comment removed

naturalinsulin 1 month ago

Comment removed

porkinsulin 1 month ago

Comment removed

MrOldcars2 1 month ago

This has been flagged as spam show

I have used Humalog (not human) and Lantus. They both hit like hammers and had no duration. I import pork insulin from Canada and it works much better for me. I prefer the natural insulin. Look at the ingredients used to make Humalog and Lantus. I think it will surprise you. I've had type 1 diabetes for a long time. I will not go back to the sci-fi insulin again. It was dangerous for me. Most doctors follow the pharmaceutical companies advice and do not listen to their patients.

MrOldcars2 1 month ago 6

This has been flagged as spam show

I just read that George H.W.Bush & Dan Quayle with ties to Eli Lilly encouraged the fast track of the rDNA synthetic insulin through the FDA & then the Bush administration tried to limit the public's ability to sue drug companies. The profits from rDNA synthetic insulin affords the powerful to purchase new cars for their children, while we parents of diabetic children are left to purchase coffins or worse for our children, because of the defective insulin that we are forced to buy in America

naturalinsulin 1 month ago

@deanjean71 I love the delete tab.

DarthHater100 3 months ago

this video helps me to understand the RECOMBINANT DNA now im ready for the test tommorow :)

rjjnc13 3 months ago

Also, many organism's dont have DNA at all but RNA (Bacteria, Virus's)

drsweetluv 6 months ago

Wow, this video came on a promo DVD/CD with a Compaq computer I bought back in 1995. Never thought I'd see it again. How old is this animation?!

wien19 11 months ago

DNA for kindergarten

amrobz 1 year ago

youd have to be fuckign retarded not to know this shit.

H011ycR4p 1 year ago

This comment has received too many negative votes show

@deanjean71 Stop trying to scare people and spread non-sense. What you say is not true. And to suggest that your opinion and how you feel has any bearing on the facts of science is asinine. rDNA insulin IS human insulin. That is a fact, period. And by the way, there are MILLIONS of people who have diabetes that would also agree that synthetic insulin is the same thing. Only people who get the idea in there head claim a difference. Its called the placebo effect.

DarthHater100 1 year ago

hmmm thanxs it helped me understand my lessons a bit....!

chimblechaitra 1 year ago

OOOOh, do the ARN'T to scale... got it!

emmapassey1 1 year ago

what is the "tape" in gene splicing that is used

Sebastianxbox360 1 year ago

@Sebastianxbox360 DNA polymerase III would catalyze phosphodiester bonds between nucleotides that are next to each other on the backbone. Also hydrogen bonds form without an enzyme, between nucleotides that are across from each other, holding the 2 strands together. I think thats how it goes.

DarthHater100 1 year ago

@DarthHater100 Dna ligase would also repair any breaks with a phosphodiester bond.

DarthHater100 1 year ago

in a way this was not hard to find but because i am a fucking retard it took forever

aaronlikesalex 2 years ago

Are you sure recombinant insulin isn't human insulin? Last time I checked the two separate recombinant plasmids do code for the exact copies of alpha and beta chains that also compose "natural" insulin. Let me explain it in layman terms, two strings compose insulin's basic structure, in the body these aren't as easily differentiated. Recombinant technology makes each string in separate cultivation reactions and then puts both string together to form, guess what, the same "natural" protein.

Anstel 2 years ago

"Every organism has millions of strands of DNA in each cell"

Nope.

Most bacteria have ONE circular strand.

Most human cells have

23 chromosomes X 2 copies=46 strands of DNA

Plus several thousand copies of very small circular mitochondrial DNA.

grillapineapple 2 years ago 22

thanks for the correction, always liked it when people put out the right info

ApocaIypse 2 years ago

It says "EVERY ORGANISM HAS MILLIONS OF STRANDS". Not each CELL has millions of strands.

WolYou 2 years ago

"in each cell".

It would still be wrong. Many organisms (bacteria, yeast) have only one cell.

grillapineapple 2 years ago

@grillapineapple yeah definite FAIL!!

gykmeister 1 year ago

Comment removed

grillapineapple 2 years ago

Is this how they made those flourescant mice? Interesting...

Lupiswolf 2 years ago

thats my DNA

CoryBerg123 3 years ago

This has been flagged as spam show

bter123qweasdzxc345rtyfghvbn678teuiojklbnmvsdvawr+nbtbtrwrtefgsdfgvbsefsdgfgeterterter654rt56156dfg165df4g6dg1s84g876g74761468174g65d4fg65d4fgd213fg32

1df1g56er5634546654uty1j65456156741i6547156jk471k564617k6654179501564l178954664k15546715634j156445615634461ji5764k18546l165794;179645;16805;1546;1-5460;061;8051;751l5646k15654jk16546155461j5656j1565463j1j1546tyj15154t156jtrj51616j54s067229865tsfg nbntrklwejobtpweritjvgw39t840t,34ptj,90nwbtm890w3j,s06s06s06s06s06s06s06s06s06asdfx0s60asdf0a6sdfasdf

CoryBerg123 3 years ago