$2499 is 'cheap' eh? Funny how they consider that to be cheap and £399 for the BBC micro around the same time was considered 'expensive'. Were all americans super rich wall street moguels in the 80's or something?
DONT READ THIS Cause It Really Works. YOU WILL GET KISSED ON THE NEAREST POSSIBLE FRIDAY BY THE LOVE OF YOUR LIFE. TOMORROW WILL BE THE BEST DAY OF YOUR LIFE. HOWEVER IF YOU DONT POST THIS COMMENT TO AT LEAST 3 VIDEOS YOU WILL DIE WITHIN 2 DAYS. NOW UV STARTED READIN DIS DUNT STOP THIS IS SO SCARY. SEND THIS OVER TO 5 VIDEOS IN 143 MINUTES WHEN UR DONE PRESS F6 AND UR CRUSHES NAME WILL APPEAR
Uncle Billy said so! That's why they've chosen it... to then copy it xD cause command prompts were so boring =P
I know GUI idea was Xerox's, but this way to do things is Apple's, that's what Microsoft truly copied. Xerox just had a prototype, and idea, nothing functional.
I find it ironic that Apple now makes PC clones and markets them as Macs(and their PC clones are better than their old "macs" which weren't PC clones).
any mainstream personal computer on the market is now a PC clone. IBM's original design scales well and it's been a success.
you can say what you want about software(Mac OSX is a solid OS), but hardware wise, PCs are now king simply because PPC is dead(what older macs used), sparc is dead, and nothing else is really viable anymore.
Hey, wait there! Just to clarify, the new Macs aren't exactly true "PC Clones". They don't have a BIOS (they have EFIs), nor PICs and IBM legacy stuff. They can't run DOS and Windows runs over an emulation layer.
While I agree that the IBM architecture is commercially viable, I don't see it as ingenious as the original Apple II or Macintosh 68k/PPC architecture. It is messy and you have to go trough three different processor modes just to use 64 bits.
Did anyone else realize that MacDraw looked exactly like the Windows 3.1 version of Paint? And Apple OS1 came out in the mid 1980s and Windows 3.1 came out in 1992. Does this seem odd to anyone else?
And as far as the "fuck macs and their shitty computers" Your username is Runescape400mil. May I add Runescape is one of the shittiest MMORPG's out there?
With such a great computer, why waste time playing a game that you could play on any computer with Internet and java installed.
Apple truly revolutionized the way people use computers.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Black and White..... ha ha ha. Idiots. The Commodore Amiga, released a year later, used high resolution COLOR graphics. My first computer was in Color. There was no reason to use black and white except the developers lack the talent to create hardware for the job.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Commodore was a messed up company, but they didn't create the Amiga, that was the work of ex-Atari employees. Apple kept a 25 year old gray scale turd alive long enough finally got it halfway decent. Don't pat yourself on the back too hard. You don't know shit about hardware, software, the computer industry or anything else except the golden PR stream that trickles from Steve Job's cock.
Having used both the XL and original 128k Mac when they came it I feel old. It seems like just yesterday I was playing Dungeon of Doom, trying to understand why Microsoft BASIC on the Mac was full screen and didn't use the UI of the Mac ... and who can forget Puzzle and MacPaint?
Apple had to change their ways because Microsoft had (and has, although loosening) an iron grip on those areas. Where Apple really (and always) ruled was Creative Pro apps, like film maker and graphic design. This is the area they had to focus on to stay alive.
except they just ruined that. Without INTEL chips now, they cant run a partition for windows, which means programs like Rhino or Autodesk cannot run on Mac. ALSO now that CS4 comes in 64 Bit, people will use a regular 64bit PC to run it. Mac still refuses to run a 64bit os.
OS X Leopard is 64 Bit. The issue is that apple does not allow carbon to be in 64 bit, which they changed at the last second. (Messing up adobes plans.)
Rest in peace, Mr. Jobs. Thank you for the company you gave us.
NESherv 3 months ago
Cheap so poeple can afford it? yea right
TheQhozt 5 months ago
$2499 is 'cheap' eh? Funny how they consider that to be cheap and £399 for the BBC micro around the same time was considered 'expensive'. Were all americans super rich wall street moguels in the 80's or something?
madcapoperator 7 months ago
Have fun when the boss is not around " he sure is right..
davvvideos 8 months ago
i want that clear one
MrGameboy1989 11 months ago
Amazing video - thanks! I shared it with the Apple community on MyAppleSpace com
I'm sure they will appreciate it - thanks!
MyAppleSpaceCOM 1 year ago
Xerox Alto can't be considered a commercial product because it was never sold in public, just used on the PARC campus.
yennpcj 1 year ago 2
Apple the innovation company
REMR001 1 year ago
1984: "Who the hell would possibly need 128k of memory?"
2010: "Who the hell would possibly need 1 TB of memory?"
2024: "Who the hell would possibly need 128 TB of memory?"
JesusManson323 1 year ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Mac sucks ASS!
globalbiznetwork 2 years ago
@globalbiznetwork
you so stupid baby
REMR001 1 year ago
hahahahah xD!!!!!
omg someone marked my answer -1! =(
Dunno-who didn't like to read the truth, I think xD
dotMacintosh 2 years ago
i marked +1... don't worry, i support you...
quequiluis 2 years ago 2
Yey ;) I guess truth is tough for some people... =P
dotMacintosh 2 years ago
those specs wern't there at the beginning. the 1981 macintosh design had a 6809E 8-bit processor, and 64 Kbytes of ram
kargaroc386 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
theres this funny thing on my page must see...
oTGFoCONViCT 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
DONT READ THIS Cause It Really Works. YOU WILL GET KISSED ON THE NEAREST POSSIBLE FRIDAY BY THE LOVE OF YOUR LIFE. TOMORROW WILL BE THE BEST DAY OF YOUR LIFE. HOWEVER IF YOU DONT POST THIS COMMENT TO AT LEAST 3 VIDEOS YOU WILL DIE WITHIN 2 DAYS. NOW UV STARTED READIN DIS DUNT STOP THIS IS SO SCARY. SEND THIS OVER TO 5 VIDEOS IN 143 MINUTES WHEN UR DONE PRESS F6 AND UR CRUSHES NAME WILL APPEAR
THR34T1 2 years ago
128kb wooooooow!!! not
lorddainol7 3 years ago
Bill: "MS is choosing this Apple Macintosh enviroment because overtime the other enviroments won't be interesting." lol
yemilr 3 years ago
Uncle Billy said so! That's why they've chosen it... to then copy it xD cause command prompts were so boring =P
I know GUI idea was Xerox's, but this way to do things is Apple's, that's what Microsoft truly copied. Xerox just had a prototype, and idea, nothing functional.
dotMacintosh 3 years ago
you forgot the Xerox Alto.
Its not just an idea. They had one of the earliest commercial graphical desktop.
jamesjan 2 years ago 2
we have come along way
idjoemama 3 years ago 7
This comment has received too many negative votes show
"We"? Oh, like you're really part of anything. You just own a fucking Mac computer and think you're part of something special.
Darbyjack 3 years ago
I find it ironic that Apple now makes PC clones and markets them as Macs(and their PC clones are better than their old "macs" which weren't PC clones).
any mainstream personal computer on the market is now a PC clone. IBM's original design scales well and it's been a success.
you can say what you want about software(Mac OSX is a solid OS), but hardware wise, PCs are now king simply because PPC is dead(what older macs used), sparc is dead, and nothing else is really viable anymore.
xelink 3 years ago 3
Not to mention most linux mirrors can't be bothered to support the ppc arch as its like less than 5% of the total downloads.
Dejaiin 3 years ago
Hey, wait there! Just to clarify, the new Macs aren't exactly true "PC Clones". They don't have a BIOS (they have EFIs), nor PICs and IBM legacy stuff. They can't run DOS and Windows runs over an emulation layer.
While I agree that the IBM architecture is commercially viable, I don't see it as ingenious as the original Apple II or Macintosh 68k/PPC architecture. It is messy and you have to go trough three different processor modes just to use 64 bits.
blynx666 3 years ago
Well... we are... the most important part of it actually. We are the clients. Ultimately, it's our money making it happen.
Eikinkloster 3 years ago
if you'd like more apple/iphone news and speculation heard over to tylerhaze.wordpress.c0m
replace 0 with o
thizaze1 3 years ago
Dang what a cutie Steve Job was and still is! :-)
thibaulthalpern 3 years ago
Did anyone else realize that MacDraw looked exactly like the Windows 3.1 version of Paint? And Apple OS1 came out in the mid 1980s and Windows 3.1 came out in 1992. Does this seem odd to anyone else?
IcantspellXIII 3 years ago
its not that cheap though
shayanrafizadeh 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
nerds
shayanrafizadeh 3 years ago
u know. the ball mice are just the original trackers turned upside down :p
relentlessJnin 3 years ago 5
Wonderful!
iDeej 3 years ago
thanks!
dmarcoot 3 years ago
go on youtube and type down the kookers!!they are so cool!
blueharvestboy 3 years ago
(whoopsies the comment below was ment for runescape400mil :)
keenanlovesmac 3 years ago
bill gate@ 6:25
makeMyDayBitch 3 years ago
no dashboard?
mbdan 3 years ago
dashboard come with OS X lol. this is the making of MacOS1
relentlessJnin 3 years ago
actually this is like the macintosh os.I dont think there was an os1. I know apple had a operating system that was there first. Ya-know, the lisa os.
T966ER 3 years ago
at 49 seconds, he looks and speaks just like the Videlectrix guy! "I said make good graphics!"
th3burnin470r 3 years ago 2
Yes!
KrugMegazord 3 years ago
And as far as the "fuck macs and their shitty computers" Your username is Runescape400mil. May I add Runescape is one of the shittiest MMORPG's out there?
With such a great computer, why waste time playing a game that you could play on any computer with Internet and java installed.
Apple truly revolutionized the way people use computers.
no doubt about that
deanx2009 3 years ago 8
Anybody know the song playing in the background?
beamercola 3 years ago
Why does this get asked on every single Youtube video? :X
theurge14 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Black and White..... ha ha ha. Idiots. The Commodore Amiga, released a year later, used high resolution COLOR graphics. My first computer was in Color. There was no reason to use black and white except the developers lack the talent to create hardware for the job.
jonah1976 3 years ago
Gee, that's a fantastic point !
You must be right -- what, with the way Commodore is a household name today! Apple developers certainly "lack the talent"...
awmitchell 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Commodore was a messed up company, but they didn't create the Amiga, that was the work of ex-Atari employees. Apple kept a 25 year old gray scale turd alive long enough finally got it halfway decent. Don't pat yourself on the back too hard. You don't know shit about hardware, software, the computer industry or anything else except the golden PR stream that trickles from Steve Job's cock.
jonah1976 3 years ago
i love mac
xtremepntb 3 years ago
SUPER NERDS.
Lol.
Jk.
I love iMacs.
ooberpwnage 3 years ago
Having used both the XL and original 128k Mac when they came it I feel old. It seems like just yesterday I was playing Dungeon of Doom, trying to understand why Microsoft BASIC on the Mac was full screen and didn't use the UI of the Mac ... and who can forget Puzzle and MacPaint?
keithadler 3 years ago
ok, it was invented for office use, and with games. what happened? I love my mac but how has their focus changed so much?
timsbro2000 3 years ago
Apple had to change their ways because Microsoft had (and has, although loosening) an iron grip on those areas. Where Apple really (and always) ruled was Creative Pro apps, like film maker and graphic design. This is the area they had to focus on to stay alive.
annoyedwithsignup 3 years ago 3
except they just ruined that. Without INTEL chips now, they cant run a partition for windows, which means programs like Rhino or Autodesk cannot run on Mac. ALSO now that CS4 comes in 64 Bit, people will use a regular 64bit PC to run it. Mac still refuses to run a 64bit os.
MapleStoryOblivion 3 years ago
OS X Leopard is 64 Bit. The issue is that apple does not allow carbon to be in 64 bit, which they changed at the last second. (Messing up adobes plans.)
drivojulianrobotnik 2 years ago
Was That Bill Gates I saw early in this video?
Mac562007 3 years ago
yes
willteddy09 3 years ago
chuckiej said(2 hours ago -see above)
No, a guy on the team looked kinda like him. But when you compare to the Bill Gates at the end you see big differences
Thanks for answering willteddy09
Mac562007
Mac562007 3 years ago
No, a guy on the team looked kinda like him. But when you compare to the Bill Gates at the end you see big differences
chuckiej 3 years ago
Ya, you're right. Thanks.
Mac562007 3 years ago
I recently used a mac just like that it is surprisingly responsive.
skater9269 3 years ago
I've never seen such huge glasses in my life! <3 MB
TheMaterialBitch 3 years ago
thanks!
awesome to watch!
NowlinMD 3 years ago 2
Thanks for sharing this. Kudos from QuadSix50 over at the 68KMLA. :-)
QuadSix50 3 years ago 2
"developing on anything else (other than mac) just won't be interesting."
-Bill Gates
flydaddyophus 3 years ago 16
Some of these engineers look like they need som social programming... and soap...
jimdidr 3 years ago
I can envision it now... 1980's MacBook Air. Weighs 5kg's, 10cm thick.
Tr0janV0dka 3 years ago 3
yea and it fits comfortably inside a standard size.. room
femonkey 3 years ago
WOW i love the quality! lol
EDitS11 3 years ago
I want that mac!
killwize 3 years ago
Ahh, the 80's. When people thought it's aesthetically appropriate to put actual engineers into promotional videos!
otavallai 3 years ago
Lol... the '80s - people didn't care how you looked if you are an engineer!
mattj2887 3 years ago
"and because we are apple, we included a couple of games"
And they will be the only games you'll see in the next 25 years on a mac....
JPQsat 3 years ago 26
HAHAHAHA! This is funny because it's true...!
ChickenBot 3 years ago 3
You can run XP and all XP games on a Mac.. Are we paying attention? Yay!
feet77 3 years ago
awesome video!!! ^^
0xC0FF33 3 years ago
32 bit processor?! holy shit!
tightcoupling 3 years ago 6
"figure out how to make it cheap so people can afford it"
if only they stuck to this plan.
therealv0x 3 years ago 5
Actually it cost more then. so...
killwize 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Imagine all these people in a orgy!
Rp707 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
They're all ugly.. jeez!
MikaeLes 3 years ago
Yeah nevermind that they're talented geniuses; what good are brains if you don't look good? Welcome to Idiocracy.
techmonkey4u 3 years ago 3
"Microsoft is choosing this apple Macintosh environment because over time the other environments won't be interesting"
onehitonder 3 years ago 7
This is really amazing! Thank you SO much for putting it on YouTube...it's downloading to my hard drive as I write this.
prestoleum 3 years ago