supercharged?? really must be the smalllest one they make i just drove the 2011 v6 manual today and it went alot faster then this show me some proof under the hood i'll believe it.
i think you guys have no idea what you are talking about, look how long 2nd gear is, it is pulling to 80 in 2nd and its doing damn fast. Dont think its slow because its not shifting often. You 2 are idiots. Look at the speedo and not the tach (if you even know what that is)
look cunt rag my 1995 dodge ram 1500 can do 70 in my 2 gear like i said in my first com. if it is supercharged its small and i look at the vidoes and yes i am right its really small so you don't know what your talking about silly goose
@ZZboi08 damn, no need to be so mad..It's obvious your clueless about this topic so just shutup and go flip your ram or something. Hopefully you die in it going 70 in 2nd gear. lol
I'm not mad you tweaked out meth head if you knew how to read like what i said befor he has a video of his supercharger it does not put out alot of HP. hents why it isnt very fast yea its quick but not fast and befor you say i'm clueless you should do one less line so you can read my com. all the way, ya cum dumpsterrr
How did the mileage change with the SC? I get around 25 around LA and low 30s on long freeway drives (not LA), so what would you expect the change to be if I add a supercharger?
Wow, you are clearly an idiot. I posted my source and you still are willing to go against the source where it has time stamp proof? Your piece of shit V6 accord can't do 14 second flat 1/4, because the V6 TSX can't even do that. Go fuck yourself, idiot. You clearly don't know either of those cars. An automatic V6 Accord can't even get less than 14.5 seconds on the 1/4. You want to talk 14 flat. The TSX does 15.1 or 15 flats. You sound like an idiot for say okay so much in your post
Are you stupid or retarded? I think both. The CL9 TSX (Inline 4) runs a better quarter mile time than the 07 generation and under V6 Accord. The CU2 TSX (Inline 4) runs a better quarter mile time than the 08 generation and above V6 Accord. Stating, both generation of the TSX with the (Inline 4 engine) is faster on the 1/4 mile than any V6 Accord stock per stock. Source: Dragtimes, and please you dip shit do research before talking. Also the TSX handles better.
@NigguhJason Hey dum shit tsx it is slow in the 1/4 mile 15.2s okay .and the 03-08 accord coupe v6 6MT is way faster ok from 0-60 and in the 1/4 mile 14s flat ok! cuz i know i have a 08 accord coupe v6 6MT and 06 maxima se they go at it ok!
wow this car is slow as shit check out honda accord supercharged 0 -130 now thats a fast car. and honestly this car doesnt even deserve a supercharger, buy a real car if ur gonna bother wasting that much money
@drake123josh As a daily driver, yea the TSX's turn radius is horrendous. It's even worse when you're in a hurry to get out of the way of people plus you have to throw the shift knob from reverse to first. Kind of nerve-racking....
horsepower does matter as it represents torque x RPM. and more RPM means you can have higher numerical gear ratios. compare a camaro with a 3.73 final drive ratio to a honda with a 5.38 final drive; coupled with less weight the 2 are comparable. say what you want but you can do the math yourself
yea the v6 stand is shit, its put down in a low class, and its heavy. i hate ricers man always comparing their civics to v6 stangs. who owns the drags....american muscle, nuff said lol
@sausagenmuff HAHA wow u took the wrong car for that....cuz i owned a 2003 rsx and theyre fuckin slow....i/h/e didn't cut it so i boosted (too broke to film it) 1.15 bar with no problem other then the shitty tranny...fuckin fast...but unless boosted this car does nothing good. even the power to weight ratio stock for stock is in the stangs favor...2001 gt went to 60 in at most 6 seconds and thats for the conv. sry dude...plus ive owned both cars...so yea :( sry dude. buy some tq u'll change
@sausagenmuff no dude those arent factory specs :( thats my point. the gt crushes the rsx stock for stock, off the line the rwd also gives advantage....go on some road test pages. plus i owned both and raced all the time. gt > rsx sry bud ur just completely wrong and i will agree to that
I'm not saying the 5L V8 doesnt have more power , obviously it would having more than double the displacement. but YES THOSE ARE THE CORRECT NUMBERS, the rsx is lighter and has better gear ratios. so they have the same 0-60 time.
U think ford just decided to underestimate there car when they released that number? sorry dude that doesnt happen.
@sausagenmuff 5L v8?? i thought we were talking about the 4.6 v8. look dude i know u own a rsx and u think ur cars all fast and v8's suck...but get ur head out of ur 10 inch muffler, stock for stock the mustang beats the rsx hands down. like i've told u, ive had both cars and the rsx is not faster from a roll or from dig. fwd sucks in dig and the stang has the tq to balance its extra weight. ima send u a msg showing u some links cuz u seriously need to learn
omg god damn it dude stop being a fuckin retard, i owned both fucking cars, i know that the mustang is faster stock for stock. it weighed 3300 with 300 tq, the rsx 2800 with 140!!! power to weight ratio - gt is 12.69 - rsx is 14. gt wins. gears in gt are better. rwd launched better then fwd. take this...the 05 gt took 5 sec to 60 and it gained weight. u think they made it more then a second faster? 1/4 mile is faster too
@sausagenmuff OMFG U IDIOT!!!!!!!! i was fuckin talking about tq u stupid ASS!!!! dude fuckin read god damn it ur retarded sit the fuck down. post a fuckin vid of ur super fast rsx or shut the fuck up. GT > rsx-s....and ur rsx doesn't have 210 hp only the 05 did, 06 had 201, 02-04 had 200 and their peak hp wasnt up as high. i know more about ur car then u do boy please just stop it.
"gtdrummerdude" So its called crying to prove you wrong? You can compare a car to another car that is completely in a different class. Sure you got twice the cylinders, but the Acura saves twice as much as gas. Not to mention its more luxurious, and also its more reliable. Seriously, you need a more valid argument, comparing a pony car to a entry level luxury sports sedan just don't cut it.
"gtdrummerdude" First off let me say you can't compare the two vehicles. Mustang is a pony car, and the TSX is an entry level luxury sports sedan. They both different.
Second. You're comparing a car with a 5L V8 to a car with a 2.4L inline4?
No shit the car with double the liter and cylinder can make 100 faster. You fucking have no clue. You comparing a car with twice the Liter and cylinder.
You just compared a drag car to a entry level luxury sports sedan. That's idiotic.
I'm comparing an old early 1980s carbureted 5.0 V8 with a brand new fuel injected, computer controlled, 4 valve per cylinder, supercharged 4 cylinder. Sure I have double the liters, and only a fraction of the technology, only half as many valves per cylinder, no forced induction, etc. Stop crying
actually..after commenting 3 months ago...i watch this car accelerate...and let me tell you..this TSX is mighty quick you guys annd listen to that Supercharger! ^_^ 5 stars =]
I think the haters need to go to AcuraFest, which is a highly popular Acura meet. Most of the cars there are TSXs, and this years meet there were 3 TSX with 270 WHP, and one TSX with 290 WHP. Last I checked that's why more than the G35/G37/350z/370z WHP. 370z whp = 260~265. So don't say the TSX is weak when it can be faster than those cars for cheaper. Haters need to get the fuck out!
Dude, this supercharged TSX just accelerated from 60-100 mph in 8 seconds, which sucks for a supercharged car of any kind. Buy a late '80s Mustang 5.0 on Craigslist for $2500, buy an Edelbrock top end kit (heads/cam/intake) for another $2000, and enjoy having a 310 whp, mid 12 second @ 110 mph car for less than $5000. If you want a fast car, don't buy an Acura or any new car. $30,000 - $40,000 for a 14-15 second car is pathetic when I can pay $5,000 for a 12 second car.
Lol ok. Well during high school, 4 or 5 of my friend's Acuras and Hondas blew their motors while I beat the living shit out of my Mustang and my old Dart day after day (and beat all of them in races too) and I never had a problem. If you hate American stuff, why don't you just move to Japan?
@gtdrummerdude ummm really u think fords r reliable? y do u think ford dealers around the world r shutting down ill tell u y its cuz they drink gas nd theirs unreliable lol american cars r trash i rather help the japanese economy b4 i buy any american piece of shit
Actually, new American cars are more reliable, get better mileage, have more power, and are hands down nicer than Jap stuff. American cars were shit in the '90s dude. Get with the times. Go to a Ford dealer and check out some '08 models. Ford is actually doing well financially so i'm not sure where you're getting your info... Sounds like you're a Jap fan that talks lots of shit when you know nothing about automobiles and you drive an SUV lol. Take the kids to soccer practice.
@gtdrummerdude dumb ur a classic dumb ass mustangs r pieces of shit i have a 04 acura mdx suv 3.5l v6 that makes 260 crank hp nd i beat my buddies stock mustang gt so no fox body 5.0 will beat a manual acura tsx supercharged, clearly this is automatic
Your 260 hp SUV beat a GT? Then how did my almost stock 1982 Mustang 5.0 beat my friend's '06 TL easily? Trust me, the GT wasn't racing. I put down a kid's '08 SI with I/H/E/Hondata/suspension/tires turning 8900 rpm with my '82 with nothing but an upgraded carb and a cheap pair of shorty headers. The TSX has a good motor but the car is heavy. TSX=slow
Yes my 1982 5.0 liter carbureted engine beat an bolt-on, tuned 2008 2.0 liter engine with high compression, Vtec, fuel injection, 4 valves per cylinder, reving to 8900 rpm in lighter car with a close-ratio 6 speed manual transmission. The ONLY advantage my rustang has over a 2008 SI is pure displacement, and a K20 makes up for that easily with great technology. I like and know Honda stuff (probably a lot better than yourself) so put a lid on it.
displacement might be the ONLY advantage but its also by far the most dominant factor in HP, and THE deciding factor on torque.
nonetheless i agree with you, i love Honda, but American companies like ford have FINALLY started making some pretty decent cars. even dodge is making some decent stuff . sniff sniff.. i used to love to hate American cars.. now i'm torn.
I would not say displacement is the most dominant factor in hp. Many Japanese and European companies are building sports cars that make more hp with a smaller engine which should tell you something. If displacement was the best and easiest option for power, they would simply use bigger engines. Let's say we have two 302 engines and we want to build more power. The more air/fuel charge you get in and out of an engine, the more power it makes (in very basic, gross terms). Continued....
(Cont) Putting a set of worked over 351 Cleveland heads (2.19"/1.71" valves and big ports, worked over to be even larger) or if you were a BIG TIME fabricator, a pair of 4 valve heads, on one 302, and boring and stroking the other 302 with stock heads to 400 cubic inches, the engine with the big heads would move more air and make more power than the 400, guaranteed. Another example is turbocharging. You're just forcing a TON more air in an engine, and it makes a ton of power.
(Cont 2) Displacement is the POTENTIAL for power, but there are much better ways to make it. 4 valve heads, high flow induction and exhaust systems, valvetrains with variable valve timing and systems that allow conservative camshaft profiles at low rpm for fuel economy, emissions, driveability and low-end response, and then switch to an aggressive camshaft profile at high rpm to maximize power without sacrificing ANYTHING at low rpm (Vtec), more compression, etc are better ways to make power.
absoutly your right, for instance a honda's f1 engine makes over 1000 HP out of 1.5 liters. clearly there IS replacement for displacement. but "on the hole" it's clearly the most important factor i still say
yea turbos are the great equalizer when it comes to arguing displacement .
high revs + big turbo = a lot of power u cant really use a turbo charged engine when arguing about displacement cause if u turbo charged a 5.OL and you turbo charged a 1.5L w/ equal boost who would make more power/torque?
hahaha my 89 fox body cobra would fuckin smoke MY 2004 acura tsx and will smoke any mdx man trust me no v6 is acura is keepin up with my 12 second 5.0 litre
No clue why people diss the TSX. Did you know it only cost 28~29K for this generation fully loaded OTD (Out the door). Lets see.. compare that to a fully loaded 08 G35 that is 40K OTD. A G35 does high 13s? 13.8 area. Cost about 11~12K more. An Acura TSX does high 14s. 1K~2K for Hondata chip. Bring it to mid 14s, 2K~3K for SC, and 1~2K for i/h/e. At most it will cost 7K to make the TSX faster than the G35, and look at that its still cheaper than the G35. I seen modded TSX take on G/Z.
he does have a supercharger in there..can you not hear it?? turn your high frequencies up on your audio and its there...the slipstream of the wind in this video makes it somewhat hard to hear =/ ...dont reply with rude comments tho..not a good idea with me..
@chrisair2112 ill eat your bitch ass for breakfest gay boy... an no its not supercharged trust me it hit 0 to 60 in 8 secs know ur shit before u talk out the shit u piss out of ..
Stick shifts are hella fun, but since 2008 automatic trannies have become more advanced at high rpm shifting, cvt, and other bs i haven't heard of. Performance is great and a little funnier with slap sticks, shift paddles, and rev matching. I'm just saying their not always slower or by enuff to mention, plus sometimes you dont have a choose.
"Pelledgrino69" one word for you dipshit. He's using sports mode, it's basically a 5 speed manual throughout the whole video. So it was manual, but clutchless. Learn before talking, but it is an automatic over all, and a 6 speed manual would've been better for the EPA gas ratings (Fuel Efficiency).
man whats up with people hatting on autos! fukkin the fastest merc and even bugatti are autos! u just cant take that this car is fast as shit! All the proffessional drag racers use auto trannys! sure the manual is way more fun, but people have thieir prefferences so stop hatting! Nice vid DUDE!!!
the veyron has 1000hp, so in that case yes auto is better but for an everyday "sports" car standards will out perform automatics on gas milage and performance. im tired of auto drivers using the 1000hp cars as a defense. this isnt a veyron.
many porches are Tip/Tronic would you put them in a sports class? Look manuals are faster and more fun, but that dosent meant that that auto's cant be as fun, hell most of them in my town are faster than any manual out there!!!!
thats definately not true from where im from. our fastest are probably a sweet rx-7 and evo 7, some other but unsure.. i know those 2 are both fast and standard. standard FTW.
dude it all depends. Most of the guys that race have muscle cars that beat the crap out of everything else. Im an import guy, hell a drive an acura, but here, fucking muscle kills import, unless there is like a well tooned viper or supra, but havent seen those in a while. I live in PHX by the way!!! My buffy has an RX7. sweet car, but old as dirt! There are many evos 2. But never underestimate an auto man. Hey I preffer manual, but drive an auto. Y? IM LAZY AS SHIT LOL
yea the 6 speed kicks butt, unfortinetly i got the AT. Yea it should definetly be close since u have some stuff done to your stang ;);. Did you ever run it at the track?
Lol its funny that when I beat someone they like, well duhhh you gonna win its a freaking V8, and it always puts a smile on my face saying, " Nah! Its a V6" lol and they cant believe it, I have to pull over and pop the hood to prove it lol
actually ur time is inconsistent with ur trap speed. Are you sure it is 115? If u were going that fast u would end up in the low 12'S. Did you mean 105? If so, this must be a hell of a tune u did. FOr example the new v8 camaro has 108MPH trap speed. Do you have nos maybe?
My bad bro, I meant to say 105. I took it to a shop and had a costume tune done to it, and i also have the engine bored and stroked to 4.3L, thats why its hella quick. I Can make it in the low 12s, but i spin like crazy, I have all these mods done to it but still have the stupid stock rims and tires lol.
u said a tune, lol, it has much more than that. Hey let the car be a sleeper, but when ur at the track, deflating ur tires help a LOT! u have more surface to put ur power down.
lol I know, but I spent all my money on engine upgrades, that I wasent thinking how i am going to put that power down, oh well still goes like stink lol
i dont care about the new tsx, in general manuals have better gas milage and control over performance unless you have some serious work done. i dont need to do research, its a well known fact. sit around youtube and bitch about shit some more. get a life. bring out the 1 in a million to try to prove me wrong. you're just another asshole.
Dude, this 1 in a million is what this whole video is over. Why are you telling me to get a life when you just wrote me a novel of dumb ass remarks? You have too much time on your hands. BTW, most modert automatics DO get better gas mileage because they are equipped with 5 speeds and have better technology.
i dont think thats true, but ok. and no, thats not what this is about. i was talking to someone else about a variety of cars, not just the tsx. why did you even enter this convo? just to look like an ass? cause you did. even if the new 2010 cars have fancy 5 or 6 speed auto's with better technology, thats not what i was talking about.
actually that guy is right, currently, with new EPA ratings autos are starting to pass manuals in mileage...i bet its because of how most of us drive our manuals; too much temptation
Lol if you have a manual you ripped some gears in it, thats why people buy them, for fun. And I just dont like autos cuz u dont as much control over the car.
only problem with automatics used to be their long shift time and the amount of power they lost during shifts. The modern autos are a lot better. Dont get me wrong, i will forever support manual transmissions, but sometimes you dont have a choice. Like with my car. I would never skip out on a deal like I got on my car which is an auto. You will never notice especially when you switch to tiptronic.
its obviously not tips, you can clearly see there is no vtech engagement. the reason there is no vtech switchover is because the car is already in vetch. the reason for that is because comptech S/C reflashes your ecu to engage vtech at 3k.
TSX is a Entry Level Luxury Sports Sedan. Its not a "Sports Car". "Sports Car" I would say R8 GT-R GT2 M3 M5 you name it... Entry Level Luxury Sports Sedan, would be IS250, g35, TSX, 3 series, Etc... (I'm not shitting any of you) Check online there are lists for it. Google it or Yahoo.
maybe would have been more impressive with the 6 speed manual. Tiptronic is nothing like the manual as it is computer controlled, so it won't really let you do what you want no matter what. Wasn't too impressed but still cool. TSX owners know it's not a sports car, but still fun to drive.
to me it doesnt look like its worth the what 4500-5k? plus i would get a shop to do it so there is even more cash! i would rather upgrade to the tl type s or g35s
Car is fast, that is all that matters. Depends on the tyranny if it can handle the increased torque. If it's within it's limits, I see no issue except voiding your power train warranty.
That is competely unture except in effect to drag racing. In drag racing you ultilize the torque converter on an essentially manual transmission, you eliminate the need for a time wasting clutch between gears. The TC in street automatic cars is the weak point and will start to slip and give up if you get on it too hard for a lot of miles. In an old GM or Ford its not to expensive to fix but on newer computerized trannies its extremely expensive.
That is absolutly beautiful. Is the only mods to your tsx the injen CAI and the supercharger with the hondata SC reflash? I am blown away, tht is quick and it sounds amazing. hats off
that means he turned off the vehicle stability assistance VSA. helps prevent unnecessary wheel spin in rain or snow. it's usually a good idea to turn these things off with superchargers or turbos, too long to explain why.
Comment removed
arnoni11 1 month ago
this is how fast supercharged is? hmm
OverlyExcitedNewJack 8 months ago
You wasted your money. Its a fwd car. Lol
H1mynameisLarry 9 months ago
slow for a supercharger
SLANG777 9 months ago
supercharged?? really must be the smalllest one they make i just drove the 2011 v6 manual today and it went alot faster then this show me some proof under the hood i'll believe it.
ZZboi08 9 months ago
@ZZboi08 and @slang777
i think you guys have no idea what you are talking about, look how long 2nd gear is, it is pulling to 80 in 2nd and its doing damn fast. Dont think its slow because its not shifting often. You 2 are idiots. Look at the speedo and not the tach (if you even know what that is)
96shox 9 months ago
@96shox
look cunt rag my 1995 dodge ram 1500 can do 70 in my 2 gear like i said in my first com. if it is supercharged its small and i look at the vidoes and yes i am right its really small so you don't know what your talking about silly goose
ZZboi08 9 months ago
@ZZboi08 damn, no need to be so mad..It's obvious your clueless about this topic so just shutup and go flip your ram or something. Hopefully you die in it going 70 in 2nd gear. lol
96shox 8 months ago
@96shox
I'm not mad you tweaked out meth head if you knew how to read like what i said befor he has a video of his supercharger it does not put out alot of HP. hents why it isnt very fast yea its quick but not fast and befor you say i'm clueless you should do one less line so you can read my com. all the way, ya cum dumpsterrr
ZZboi08 8 months ago
How did the mileage change with the SC? I get around 25 around LA and low 30s on long freeway drives (not LA), so what would you expect the change to be if I add a supercharger?
LittleFaucher 9 months ago
its auto?
andreynfs 10 months ago
umm...how about looking at the road
PersianUFC 10 months ago
i like
seri267 11 months ago
vq will eat this!! :p
carsnwomen91 1 year ago
@LWDDAR13
Wow, you are clearly an idiot. I posted my source and you still are willing to go against the source where it has time stamp proof? Your piece of shit V6 accord can't do 14 second flat 1/4, because the V6 TSX can't even do that. Go fuck yourself, idiot. You clearly don't know either of those cars. An automatic V6 Accord can't even get less than 14.5 seconds on the 1/4. You want to talk 14 flat. The TSX does 15.1 or 15 flats. You sound like an idiot for say okay so much in your post
NigguhJason 1 year ago
@LegendXOfXTheXStreet
Are you stupid or retarded? I think both. The CL9 TSX (Inline 4) runs a better quarter mile time than the 07 generation and under V6 Accord. The CU2 TSX (Inline 4) runs a better quarter mile time than the 08 generation and above V6 Accord. Stating, both generation of the TSX with the (Inline 4 engine) is faster on the 1/4 mile than any V6 Accord stock per stock. Source: Dragtimes, and please you dip shit do research before talking. Also the TSX handles better.
NigguhJason 1 year ago
@NigguhJason Hey dum shit tsx it is slow in the 1/4 mile 15.2s okay .and the 03-08 accord coupe v6 6MT is way faster ok from 0-60 and in the 1/4 mile 14s flat ok! cuz i know i have a 08 accord coupe v6 6MT and 06 maxima se they go at it ok!
LWDDAR13 1 year ago
manual transmission im assuming?i say this because of the redline shift
CRAZYXBLACKXMAN 1 year ago
ugh imports
mastaajbomb 1 year ago
yo this thing is quick nice car bro
Jmoney9105 1 year ago
this thing is actually pretty quick
chrisair2112 1 year ago
why not just get the tl
vincecarter14 1 year ago
@vincecarter14 this handles better and is lighter
teddyd2009 1 year ago
wow this car is slow as shit check out honda accord supercharged 0 -130 now thats a fast car. and honestly this car doesnt even deserve a supercharger, buy a real car if ur gonna bother wasting that much money
LegendXOfXTheXStreet 1 year ago
@LegendXOfXTheXStreet TSX still corners better =)
rongdendragon 1 year ago
@rongdendragon
i just traded in my 07 tsx for a 08 TL-s and i notice a big difference in turning. the tsx turns way better than the TL-s
paragonx11 1 year ago 10
@paragonx11 Try the new TL : )
Solumic 10 months ago
@paragonx11 god i hate the tsx turn radius and i have never tried the tl-s it must be horrendous
drake123josh 5 months ago
@drake123josh As a daily driver, yea the TSX's turn radius is horrendous. It's even worse when you're in a hurry to get out of the way of people plus you have to throw the shift knob from reverse to first. Kind of nerve-racking....
MercyFallout 2 months ago
fail
209sub0 1 year ago
horsepower does matter as it represents torque x RPM. and more RPM means you can have higher numerical gear ratios. compare a camaro with a 3.73 final drive ratio to a honda with a 5.38 final drive; coupled with less weight the 2 are comparable. say what you want but you can do the math yourself
Hirokane010 2 years ago
@Hirokane010 well put,
2001 Honda integra 1.8L 0-60 in 7 seconds
2001 Ford Mustang 3.8L 0-60 in 8.2 seconds
Spinners win races. Stump pullers might "feel" powerfull, but they DONT win races.
sausagenmuff 1 year ago
yea the v6 stand is shit, its put down in a low class, and its heavy. i hate ricers man always comparing their civics to v6 stangs. who owns the drags....american muscle, nuff said lol
SpdDemon69 1 year ago
@SpdDemon69 Alright, well take my car against a V8 mustang (both stock)
2003 RSX 2.0L 0-60 in 6.5 seconds
2003 Mustang 4.6L 0-60 in 6.6 seconds
granted, the ford OBVIOUSLY has more torque and a you feel it when you drive.
but I''ll take my RSX any day.
sausagenmuff 1 year ago
@sausagenmuff HAHA wow u took the wrong car for that....cuz i owned a 2003 rsx and theyre fuckin slow....i/h/e didn't cut it so i boosted (too broke to film it) 1.15 bar with no problem other then the shitty tranny...fuckin fast...but unless boosted this car does nothing good. even the power to weight ratio stock for stock is in the stangs favor...2001 gt went to 60 in at most 6 seconds and thats for the conv. sry dude...plus ive owned both cars...so yea :( sry dude. buy some tq u'll change
SpdDemon69 1 year ago
@SpdDemon69
riiiight. so I post factory specs. and you ramble on talking like a 14 year old and meaningless i dont even know what.
well just agree to disagree.
sausagenmuff 1 year ago
@sausagenmuff no dude those arent factory specs :( thats my point. the gt crushes the rsx stock for stock, off the line the rwd also gives advantage....go on some road test pages. plus i owned both and raced all the time. gt > rsx sry bud ur just completely wrong and i will agree to that
SpdDemon69 1 year ago
@SpdDemon69
I'm not saying the 5L V8 doesnt have more power , obviously it would having more than double the displacement. but YES THOSE ARE THE CORRECT NUMBERS, the rsx is lighter and has better gear ratios. so they have the same 0-60 time.
U think ford just decided to underestimate there car when they released that number? sorry dude that doesnt happen.
sausagenmuff 1 year ago
@sausagenmuff 5L v8?? i thought we were talking about the 4.6 v8. look dude i know u own a rsx and u think ur cars all fast and v8's suck...but get ur head out of ur 10 inch muffler, stock for stock the mustang beats the rsx hands down. like i've told u, ive had both cars and the rsx is not faster from a roll or from dig. fwd sucks in dig and the stang has the tq to balance its extra weight. ima send u a msg showing u some links cuz u seriously need to learn
SpdDemon69 1 year ago
@SpdDemon69
ugh.
a 2003 mustang V8, had 260HP and weighed 3,300LBS, I'd say a 0-60 time of six and a half seconds sounds pretty fair for that don't you?
but i guess, ford decided to release the wrong figures that year and under rate there car , and it miraculiously goes faster than that.
fuck use your head.
sausagenmuff 1 year ago
omg god damn it dude stop being a fuckin retard, i owned both fucking cars, i know that the mustang is faster stock for stock. it weighed 3300 with 300 tq, the rsx 2800 with 140!!! power to weight ratio - gt is 12.69 - rsx is 14. gt wins. gears in gt are better. rwd launched better then fwd. take this...the 05 gt took 5 sec to 60 and it gained weight. u think they made it more then a second faster? 1/4 mile is faster too
SpdDemon69 1 year ago
@SpdDemon69
RSX is 210HP stock not 140. get off your parents computer.
sausagenmuff 1 year ago
@sausagenmuff OMFG U IDIOT!!!!!!!! i was fuckin talking about tq u stupid ASS!!!! dude fuckin read god damn it ur retarded sit the fuck down. post a fuckin vid of ur super fast rsx or shut the fuck up. GT > rsx-s....and ur rsx doesn't have 210 hp only the 05 did, 06 had 201, 02-04 had 200 and their peak hp wasnt up as high. i know more about ur car then u do boy please just stop it.
SpdDemon69 1 year ago
@sausagenmuff Japanese > American also.
AllYourBase420 1 year ago
displacement is a factor in torque not hp. honda's k20 puts out 100hp per liter =D however its torque is a joke, ahhh effeciency =P
Mjesisk 2 years ago 3
@Mjesisk yes all 4cyl Honda's have the torque of an R/C car engine.....
OverlyExcitedNewJack 1 year ago
@OverlyExcitedNewJack
but u r mistaken good sir. look into hondas k24a2 it produces a good amount of power and a very suprising amount of torque.
Mjesisk 1 year ago
this car so not supercharged
philyphil2c 2 years ago
"reggaecyr" Nope. 370z is 260-270 whp. Check dyno #s and stop giving out false information.
NigguhJason 2 years ago
"gtdrummerdude" So its called crying to prove you wrong? You can compare a car to another car that is completely in a different class. Sure you got twice the cylinders, but the Acura saves twice as much as gas. Not to mention its more luxurious, and also its more reliable. Seriously, you need a more valid argument, comparing a pony car to a entry level luxury sports sedan just don't cut it.
NigguhJason 2 years ago
"gtdrummerdude" First off let me say you can't compare the two vehicles. Mustang is a pony car, and the TSX is an entry level luxury sports sedan. They both different.
Second. You're comparing a car with a 5L V8 to a car with a 2.4L inline4?
No shit the car with double the liter and cylinder can make 100 faster. You fucking have no clue. You comparing a car with twice the Liter and cylinder.
You just compared a drag car to a entry level luxury sports sedan. That's idiotic.
NigguhJason 2 years ago
I'm comparing an old early 1980s carbureted 5.0 V8 with a brand new fuel injected, computer controlled, 4 valve per cylinder, supercharged 4 cylinder. Sure I have double the liters, and only a fraction of the technology, only half as many valves per cylinder, no forced induction, etc. Stop crying
gtdrummerdude 2 years ago
actually..after commenting 3 months ago...i watch this car accelerate...and let me tell you..this TSX is mighty quick you guys annd listen to that Supercharger! ^_^ 5 stars =]
chrisair2112 2 years ago 2
it looks like it maaaybe could hang with a stock maxima
SuperBeatnuts 2 years ago
290 on wheels 370z....
reggaecyr 2 years ago
"foozooljalal"
Stock 370z dyno on Youtube, Search it.
It will show 260 WHP.
And clearly you don't know shit about cars. Just because it has a high HP doesn't mean it will lose little HP to the wheels.
WHP is actually really a lot less than the base HP. You lose a lot to the wheels.
Please learn something about cars before posting.
You just got owned.
Search the video on Youtube for proof.
Oh did I say you just got owned? Fuck off idiot.
NigguhJason 2 years ago
i could only imagine how slow it was before...
1999sr5 2 years ago
I think the haters need to go to AcuraFest, which is a highly popular Acura meet. Most of the cars there are TSXs, and this years meet there were 3 TSX with 270 WHP, and one TSX with 290 WHP. Last I checked that's why more than the G35/G37/350z/370z WHP. 370z whp = 260~265. So don't say the TSX is weak when it can be faster than those cars for cheaper. Haters need to get the fuck out!
NigguhJason 2 years ago
wahahaha r u kidding ?
im a honda fan
i have honda
but 260-265 whp in the 370z r u kidding ?
the car has 330hp something maybe 4-5 more or less hp
330hp maybe it will reach to 300 305 whp
wahahaha that was funny 260's whp in the 370z
foozooljalal 2 years ago
Dude, this supercharged TSX just accelerated from 60-100 mph in 8 seconds, which sucks for a supercharged car of any kind. Buy a late '80s Mustang 5.0 on Craigslist for $2500, buy an Edelbrock top end kit (heads/cam/intake) for another $2000, and enjoy having a 310 whp, mid 12 second @ 110 mph car for less than $5000. If you want a fast car, don't buy an Acura or any new car. $30,000 - $40,000 for a 14-15 second car is pathetic when I can pay $5,000 for a 12 second car.
gtdrummerdude 2 years ago
good buy your american junk congrats on your dept of treasury car..id rather drive a import ovedr american any day american cars= junk for life
pureadrenaline25 2 years ago
Lol ok. Well during high school, 4 or 5 of my friend's Acuras and Hondas blew their motors while I beat the living shit out of my Mustang and my old Dart day after day (and beat all of them in races too) and I never had a problem. If you hate American stuff, why don't you just move to Japan?
gtdrummerdude 2 years ago
@gtdrummerdude ummm really u think fords r reliable? y do u think ford dealers around the world r shutting down ill tell u y its cuz they drink gas nd theirs unreliable lol american cars r trash i rather help the japanese economy b4 i buy any american piece of shit
turbo3oh 2 years ago
Actually, new American cars are more reliable, get better mileage, have more power, and are hands down nicer than Jap stuff. American cars were shit in the '90s dude. Get with the times. Go to a Ford dealer and check out some '08 models. Ford is actually doing well financially so i'm not sure where you're getting your info... Sounds like you're a Jap fan that talks lots of shit when you know nothing about automobiles and you drive an SUV lol. Take the kids to soccer practice.
gtdrummerdude 2 years ago
@gtdrummerdude dumb ur a classic dumb ass mustangs r pieces of shit i have a 04 acura mdx suv 3.5l v6 that makes 260 crank hp nd i beat my buddies stock mustang gt so no fox body 5.0 will beat a manual acura tsx supercharged, clearly this is automatic
turbo3oh 2 years ago
Your 260 hp SUV beat a GT? Then how did my almost stock 1982 Mustang 5.0 beat my friend's '06 TL easily? Trust me, the GT wasn't racing. I put down a kid's '08 SI with I/H/E/Hondata/suspension/tires turning 8900 rpm with my '82 with nothing but an upgraded carb and a cheap pair of shorty headers. The TSX has a good motor but the car is heavy. TSX=slow
gtdrummerdude 2 years ago
REALLY your 5 liter V8 beat a 2.0L? wow it must be fast! get a life
the fact that you have to race a car with less than half your displacement should tell you something..
rustang = stump puller.
Honda = race winner
sausagenmuff 2 years ago
Yes my 1982 5.0 liter carbureted engine beat an bolt-on, tuned 2008 2.0 liter engine with high compression, Vtec, fuel injection, 4 valves per cylinder, reving to 8900 rpm in lighter car with a close-ratio 6 speed manual transmission. The ONLY advantage my rustang has over a 2008 SI is pure displacement, and a K20 makes up for that easily with great technology. I like and know Honda stuff (probably a lot better than yourself) so put a lid on it.
gtdrummerdude 2 years ago
displacement might be the ONLY advantage but its also by far the most dominant factor in HP, and THE deciding factor on torque.
nonetheless i agree with you, i love Honda, but American companies like ford have FINALLY started making some pretty decent cars. even dodge is making some decent stuff . sniff sniff.. i used to love to hate American cars.. now i'm torn.
sausagenmuff 2 years ago
I would not say displacement is the most dominant factor in hp. Many Japanese and European companies are building sports cars that make more hp with a smaller engine which should tell you something. If displacement was the best and easiest option for power, they would simply use bigger engines. Let's say we have two 302 engines and we want to build more power. The more air/fuel charge you get in and out of an engine, the more power it makes (in very basic, gross terms). Continued....
gtdrummerdude 2 years ago
(Cont) Putting a set of worked over 351 Cleveland heads (2.19"/1.71" valves and big ports, worked over to be even larger) or if you were a BIG TIME fabricator, a pair of 4 valve heads, on one 302, and boring and stroking the other 302 with stock heads to 400 cubic inches, the engine with the big heads would move more air and make more power than the 400, guaranteed. Another example is turbocharging. You're just forcing a TON more air in an engine, and it makes a ton of power.
gtdrummerdude 2 years ago
(Cont 2) Displacement is the POTENTIAL for power, but there are much better ways to make it. 4 valve heads, high flow induction and exhaust systems, valvetrains with variable valve timing and systems that allow conservative camshaft profiles at low rpm for fuel economy, emissions, driveability and low-end response, and then switch to an aggressive camshaft profile at high rpm to maximize power without sacrificing ANYTHING at low rpm (Vtec), more compression, etc are better ways to make power.
gtdrummerdude 2 years ago
@gtdrummerdude
absoutly your right, for instance a honda's f1 engine makes over 1000 HP out of 1.5 liters. clearly there IS replacement for displacement. but "on the hole" it's clearly the most important factor i still say
sausagenmuff 2 years ago
I though it was like a 3 liter?
gtdrummerdude 2 years ago
@gtdrummerdude
SI engine is 2.0 L 200HP
TSX is a 2.4L 200HP
no 3L
sausagenmuff 2 years ago
No I mean the F1 engine, I thought it was 3 liter.
gtdrummerdude 2 years ago
@gtdrummerdude
they probably have a few engines. the one i'm speaking of is a 1.5L turbo that makes well over 1000HP, around 1300 is most peoples guess.
sausagenmuff 2 years ago
yea turbos are the great equalizer when it comes to arguing displacement .
high revs + big turbo = a lot of power u cant really use a turbo charged engine when arguing about displacement cause if u turbo charged a 5.OL and you turbo charged a 1.5L w/ equal boost who would make more power/torque?
The2ndKrezzz3 1 year ago
@gtdrummerdude the TL has a 3.2 liter, you probably thought it was the TSX considering that both car's front looks almost exacily the same.
menglee 2 years ago
hahaha my 89 fox body cobra would fuckin smoke MY 2004 acura tsx and will smoke any mdx man trust me no v6 is acura is keepin up with my 12 second 5.0 litre
Sledneck10ferg 2 years ago
No clue why people diss the TSX. Did you know it only cost 28~29K for this generation fully loaded OTD (Out the door). Lets see.. compare that to a fully loaded 08 G35 that is 40K OTD. A G35 does high 13s? 13.8 area. Cost about 11~12K more. An Acura TSX does high 14s. 1K~2K for Hondata chip. Bring it to mid 14s, 2K~3K for SC, and 1~2K for i/h/e. At most it will cost 7K to make the TSX faster than the G35, and look at that its still cheaper than the G35. I seen modded TSX take on G/Z.
NigguhJason 2 years ago
its supercharged, kinda quiet though... you can hear it on
0:05 - 0:07 and
0:13 - 0:15
menglee 2 years ago 8
ehh.. he is supercharged...i can hear it you guys ...listen carefully for the high pitch whine in the backround...it may be a little slow tho..
chrisair2112 2 years ago
wow..who ever voted me a thumbs down...you just proved to the world that your an idiot and should go back to autoshop in high school lol
chrisair2112 2 years ago
that shit is not super charged what do u fuckers kno..
e36boyz 2 years ago
he does have a supercharger in there..can you not hear it?? turn your high frequencies up on your audio and its there...the slipstream of the wind in this video makes it somewhat hard to hear =/ ...dont reply with rude comments tho..not a good idea with me..
chrisair2112 2 years ago
@chrisair2112 ill eat your bitch ass for breakfest gay boy... an no its not supercharged trust me it hit 0 to 60 in 8 secs know ur shit before u talk out the shit u piss out of ..
e36boyz 8 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
if it is a four cylinder all you need is a turbo...but for six cylinders and up...supercharger
nubxy 2 years ago
bullshit....
pdhami01 2 years ago
fucking bumass bullshit fag
Buggie123 2 years ago
what do you know?
johntran 2 years ago
whats better for a 2004 tsx? turbo or supercharger?
hatejapanesecars 2 years ago
maybe its AT but the 2nd gear kick like hell to 80 mph
MomoAround 2 years ago
Stick shift is a lotta more fun than this auto.
Banj95 2 years ago
Come on that supercharger can do better then that!!!! Ive had my stock tsx up to 140 mph!!!
scionxb5 2 years ago
Stick shifts are hella fun, but since 2008 automatic trannies have become more advanced at high rpm shifting, cvt, and other bs i haven't heard of. Performance is great and a little funnier with slap sticks, shift paddles, and rev matching. I'm just saying their not always slower or by enuff to mention, plus sometimes you dont have a choose.
competitionready 2 years ago
"Pelledgrino69" one word for you dipshit. He's using sports mode, it's basically a 5 speed manual throughout the whole video. So it was manual, but clutchless. Learn before talking, but it is an automatic over all, and a 6 speed manual would've been better for the EPA gas ratings (Fuel Efficiency).
NigguhJason 2 years ago
1 word and 1 word only.... automatic
Pellegrino69 3 years ago
man whats up with people hatting on autos! fukkin the fastest merc and even bugatti are autos! u just cant take that this car is fast as shit! All the proffessional drag racers use auto trannys! sure the manual is way more fun, but people have thieir prefferences so stop hatting! Nice vid DUDE!!!
drtrash11 3 years ago 2
the veyron has 1000hp, so in that case yes auto is better but for an everyday "sports" car standards will out perform automatics on gas milage and performance. im tired of auto drivers using the 1000hp cars as a defense. this isnt a veyron.
Drewwberry 2 years ago 2
many porches are Tip/Tronic would you put them in a sports class? Look manuals are faster and more fun, but that dosent meant that that auto's cant be as fun, hell most of them in my town are faster than any manual out there!!!!
drtrash11 2 years ago
thats definately not true from where im from. our fastest are probably a sweet rx-7 and evo 7, some other but unsure.. i know those 2 are both fast and standard. standard FTW.
Drewwberry 2 years ago
dude it all depends. Most of the guys that race have muscle cars that beat the crap out of everything else. Im an import guy, hell a drive an acura, but here, fucking muscle kills import, unless there is like a well tooned viper or supra, but havent seen those in a while. I live in PHX by the way!!! My buffy has an RX7. sweet car, but old as dirt! There are many evos 2. But never underestimate an auto man. Hey I preffer manual, but drive an auto. Y? IM LAZY AS SHIT LOL
drtrash11 2 years ago
Bro, Viper is domestic. And wht part of PHX you live in?
jettagt97tt 2 years ago
oh, yea ups! I just live on the west side by I17 and cactus! You?
drtrash11 2 years ago
Im by 15th Ave and Bell
jettagt97tt 2 years ago
i see u drive a V6 mustang, maybe well run into eachother sometime, have a nice ol race!!!! :)
drtrash11 2 years ago
Ha ha for sure man, wht u drive?
jettagt97tt 2 years ago
acura CL type S
drtrash11 2 years ago
Nice bro I like those, especially the 6 speed. It should be a good race. My Mustang isnt stock, i just got a tune and and 4.10 gears.
jettagt97tt 2 years ago
yea the 6 speed kicks butt, unfortinetly i got the AT. Yea it should definetly be close since u have some stuff done to your stang ;);. Did you ever run it at the track?
drtrash11 2 years ago
Hell ya all the time bro. my best was 13.90 at 115
jettagt97tt 2 years ago
oh dang man, if thats the case, I wouldnt even stand a change. 14.9 @94!
drtrash11 2 years ago
Lol its funny that when I beat someone they like, well duhhh you gonna win its a freaking V8, and it always puts a smile on my face saying, " Nah! Its a V6" lol and they cant believe it, I have to pull over and pop the hood to prove it lol
jettagt97tt 2 years ago
actually ur time is inconsistent with ur trap speed. Are you sure it is 115? If u were going that fast u would end up in the low 12'S. Did you mean 105? If so, this must be a hell of a tune u did. FOr example the new v8 camaro has 108MPH trap speed. Do you have nos maybe?
drtrash11 2 years ago
My bad bro, I meant to say 105. I took it to a shop and had a costume tune done to it, and i also have the engine bored and stroked to 4.3L, thats why its hella quick. I Can make it in the low 12s, but i spin like crazy, I have all these mods done to it but still have the stupid stock rims and tires lol.
jettagt97tt 2 years ago
u said a tune, lol, it has much more than that. Hey let the car be a sleeper, but when ur at the track, deflating ur tires help a LOT! u have more surface to put ur power down.
drtrash11 2 years ago
Lol I like to keep it on the down low lol. That dont work bro, have you seen the V6 mustang tires, they look like they came off a Geo Metro lol
jettagt97tt 2 years ago
U need something wider and bigger then if ur putting down a lot of power. 285 or 295 in the back should do it!
drtrash11 2 years ago
lol I know, but I spent all my money on engine upgrades, that I wasent thinking how i am going to put that power down, oh well still goes like stink lol
jettagt97tt 2 years ago
Actually.... The new auto TSX gets more miles per gallon than the manual... Do some research
ITRlover1 2 years ago 8
i dont care about the new tsx, in general manuals have better gas milage and control over performance unless you have some serious work done. i dont need to do research, its a well known fact. sit around youtube and bitch about shit some more. get a life. bring out the 1 in a million to try to prove me wrong. you're just another asshole.
Drewwberry 2 years ago
Dude, this 1 in a million is what this whole video is over. Why are you telling me to get a life when you just wrote me a novel of dumb ass remarks? You have too much time on your hands. BTW, most modert automatics DO get better gas mileage because they are equipped with 5 speeds and have better technology.
ITRlover1 2 years ago 3
i dont think thats true, but ok. and no, thats not what this is about. i was talking to someone else about a variety of cars, not just the tsx. why did you even enter this convo? just to look like an ass? cause you did. even if the new 2010 cars have fancy 5 or 6 speed auto's with better technology, thats not what i was talking about.
Drewwberry 2 years ago
actually that guy is right, currently, with new EPA ratings autos are starting to pass manuals in mileage...i bet its because of how most of us drive our manuals; too much temptation
bp240 2 years ago 2
Lol if you have a manual you ripped some gears in it, thats why people buy them, for fun. And I just dont like autos cuz u dont as much control over the car.
jettagt97tt 2 years ago
yeah manual is so much fun..it annoys me to drive auto now
bp240 2 years ago
only problem with automatics used to be their long shift time and the amount of power they lost during shifts. The modern autos are a lot better. Dont get me wrong, i will forever support manual transmissions, but sometimes you dont have a choice. Like with my car. I would never skip out on a deal like I got on my car which is an auto. You will never notice especially when you switch to tiptronic.
USGiorgi 2 years ago
Listen to the motor and you would know its SCed..
AKADEE92 3 years ago
its not supercharger u were in tips.. anyone can do that..
Dildara786 3 years ago
its obviously not tips, you can clearly see there is no vtech engagement. the reason there is no vtech switchover is because the car is already in vetch. the reason for that is because comptech S/C reflashes your ecu to engage vtech at 3k.
...u dont see taht obviously.. its S/C bro
efnbox 3 years ago
tsx is a honda accord in europe, if u think about it accords arent that tight or luxury..:)
toppdogg1983 3 years ago
sorta true but if u get like the new 08/09 accord fully loaded its actually quite luxurious and comfortable
nitish21 3 years ago
and the v6 has balls hanging on the fucking floor!!!!
2002j30a1 3 years ago
the 08-09 accords are slower than the 06-07 accords cuz of the weight i just found that out. even though ther's more hp
nitish21 3 years ago
but they're so comfyyyyy.
and in my opinion, much more aesthetically pleasing, inside and out. i got a spoiler and some tinted windows, now it looks bangin'.
wtdeuce 2 years ago
Does it really ruin the transmission?.. How much & what about the warranty?
Lumryan 3 years ago
same thing happened to my friends civic cept his died, was a crappy d series motor tho :-/
RaptorX34 3 years ago
TSX is a Entry Level Luxury Sports Sedan. Its not a "Sports Car". "Sports Car" I would say R8 GT-R GT2 M3 M5 you name it... Entry Level Luxury Sports Sedan, would be IS250, g35, TSX, 3 series, Etc... (I'm not shitting any of you) Check online there are lists for it. Google it or Yahoo.
NigguhJason 3 years ago
you forgot the mazda 6 :D
yourmotherrules 3 years ago
This is not a supercharger, it is a tsx with a Hondata reflash.
jkaplo1985 3 years ago
how could you possibly know this?
7337crx 3 years ago
u talkin to me if u are if u c the numbs they shift up.. there on the bottom middle of the dash.. manuel u dont see taht obviously.. its tips bro
Dildara786 3 years ago
lol 1 2 3 4
dubvipers 3 years ago
maybe would have been more impressive with the 6 speed manual. Tiptronic is nothing like the manual as it is computer controlled, so it won't really let you do what you want no matter what. Wasn't too impressed but still cool. TSX owners know it's not a sports car, but still fun to drive.
MaverikDS8 3 years ago
i think people mod them because there sharp stock and sharper mod'd!
trillakilla 3 years ago
to me it doesnt look like its worth the what 4500-5k? plus i would get a shop to do it so there is even more cash! i would rather upgrade to the tl type s or g35s
TSXOVERACCORD 3 years ago 2
never mind... im jus so used to km clocks ere, didnt notice those clocks... :D
tmoneyirl 3 years ago
there is no way that is supercharged!!! slow out!!
tmoneyirl 3 years ago
its an auto trany and its faster than your dodge neon or how yall call it an "SRT-4"...dumb ho
acuradan623 3 years ago 2
its actually a tiptronic transmission which is auto and manual at the same time which u can shift to auto or the manual gears.
ProjectOriginalz 3 years ago
Triptronic is nothing like manual. It's still an auto box with an auto ecu and no clutch. Still it is fun.
LemonMurphy 3 years ago 4
no clutch, its auto
yoman2002 3 years ago
thats terrible the car is going to redline. way to fuck up a sweet ass ride..
rtony791 3 years ago
tsx when you run a supercharger the redline increases so the guage redline isn't the correct one.
Also on an auto it has a rev limit.
lcrazyaznl 3 years ago
Oh man, yeah you'll definitely ruin a honda by going to the redline. [/sarcasm]
mindsmirror 3 years ago 5
god forbid you take advantage of the vtec and redline it.....
acuradan623 3 years ago 4
Yeah, because hondas are indestructible engines. You don't even need oil in them. :/
esqueue 3 years ago 4
How much did you pay for the supercharger?
chineydupes 4 years ago
your auto aint going to lastr long. you should have gotten a manual transmisison like a real man... err like a real race car should have : >
that is still some very fast accelleration, pretty cool
LLCoolPass 4 years ago
Car is fast, that is all that matters. Depends on the tyranny if it can handle the increased torque. If it's within it's limits, I see no issue except voiding your power train warranty.
Aikithai1 4 years ago
you do realise that an auto box is stronger than a manual box? Most drag cars use auto box's such as the 3 speeds ;)
cliolord 4 years ago
That is competely unture except in effect to drag racing. In drag racing you ultilize the torque converter on an essentially manual transmission, you eliminate the need for a time wasting clutch between gears. The TC in street automatic cars is the weak point and will start to slip and give up if you get on it too hard for a lot of miles. In an old GM or Ford its not to expensive to fix but on newer computerized trannies its extremely expensive.
Pro60modman 4 years ago 3
yeah your right about the TQC cus my friend turbo'd his BUG, his 1.8l vw bug and he destroyed the TQC in like a week.
accordv6er 4 years ago
That is absolutly beautiful. Is the only mods to your tsx the injen CAI and the supercharger with the hondata SC reflash? I am blown away, tht is quick and it sounds amazing. hats off
jkaplo1985 4 years ago
its a auto as you can notice P,R,N,D,1
JDMxxSupraTT 4 years ago
5 speed automatic
BboyEndles 4 years ago
did you change the suspension kenray? because the stock suspension is waaackk, i changed mine, saving up for the comptech kit.
lambammm 4 years ago
Hey, What is the yellow symbol in the corner of the MPH gage??
schroeder1927 4 years ago
that means he turned off the vehicle stability assistance VSA. helps prevent unnecessary wheel spin in rain or snow. it's usually a good idea to turn these things off with superchargers or turbos, too long to explain why.
lambammm 4 years ago