Free inexhaustible energy is real!But the Big corporations spend millions to ensure that information does not spread to the masses,Get a real free energy motor at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM ,Be the revolution!
This experiment needs to be repeated with better video and test equipment. I would really like to see a bagged lifter on a gram scale and see if there is a reduction in weight. Further more you could attach an unbagged lifter to the scale with a string, record the reduction in weight. Compare that with the bagged lifter results to calculate what percentage ion wind and electrogravitic propulsion each contribute to lift.
@Beamshipcaptain Its strange how I printed these patents off of the US patent office, I've just begun the understanding of how this propulsion system works.
Apparently Dr. TT Brown back in the day, he noted with factual evidence that this Electrokinetic Device worked much better in a vacuum, And yes it does work in the Earths Atmosphere, however, it will only work better with Dr Henry W. Wallaces MagnetoHydroDynamic Propulsion system along with the Electrokinetic propulsion system.
@arshdeep125 Yes of COURSE it works better in vacuum! The controversy stems from the fact that NASA confirmed this,ten years ago, then seems to have been put under a "gag" order since then, despite the fact that new patents were issued! Takaaki Musha confirmed increased efficiency in vacuum, and John Fiala, one of my AEG clients, confirmed Beamship Vacuum operation, this past summer in New Mexico. We can use this technology to explore the STARS, since it has no inertia, this is WARP DRIVE.
@Beamshipcaptain Yes, However IT is NOT warp drive. It's nothing close to a warp drive. You have to travel in a worm hole which is slightly faster than the speed of light, without the time and space limit and aging. There is a patent which involves opening in hyper space, Now, as you travel into hyperspace, you can travel at SUPER LUMINOUS Velocities. Yes there is a warp drive, however I have no proof of its existence, because All i've seen is a Hyperspace travel patent.
@arshdeep125 actually it is a form of warp drive. Warp drive "warp" space time before and behind the craft travelling. What warps space-time? Massive objects like planets stars and black holes. What else can warp space time? Energy. Why? because E=mc2. Think about it. In the case of tt brown the energy is voltage. Enough Voltage or potential gradient warps space time in the similar manner that planets and black holes can. Furthermore, black holes effectively stop time because of the massive warp
@trendsetter37 light cannot escape the event horizon because of the amount of spacetime warping of a black hole. You CAN warp space time to this amount by using voltage as well. Simple.
@trendsetter37 Exactly right. You can either warp spacetime with a lot of massin a small space, or alot of energyin a small space. Energy and mass are EQUIVALENT.That iswhy high energy electrostatics, or electromagnetic toroids produce artificial gravitationfor propulsive effect. BUT,since ever atom of mass within the forcefield moves at the sme rate, inertial mass is canceled out. Gravitational mass stays the same. But without inertia, lightspeed is no longer a barrier!
@andflood Ahhh it all makes sense! This epiphany is so profound...I used to think the cabins of a ufo were unique in that they had to counteract inertia. Are you conducting experiments at home?
@andflood wait this means you would have to be "inside" the electrogravitic device right? One that used a conducting exterior for the electric potentials. Also meaning you couldn't create an electrogravitic hover board? Well you could but you would feel the inertia right?
@Beamshipcaptain How does it not have inertia? Is it because you are basically falling? i.e. falling towards which ever way space-time is warped (gravity)?
@trendsetter37 In this type of propulsion, every atom and molecule of mass within the superimpsed electricalfield moves at the same rate.There is no "freight cars effect" of motionbeing translated from one part of the model to another part and so on. This is not internalcombustion or even mag-lev. Instant starts and stops and right angle turns at any speed would not be felt. This does not violate any laws of physics. Its because of the nature of forcefield propulsion.
I was'nt the one doing the taping, it was an outfit called Soundphotosynthesis, and they had a sophisticated two-camera setup, using analog video, with long cables all over, and a control-console. Modern Equipment is hardier, more self-contained, wireless, and no black-out problems created by electrostatic-induction.
We and all the witnesses present saw the saucers start moving in the opposite direction, but evrytime we initially power up the saucers,the field emanating from the saucers playes havoc with the audio-video for 10-seconds, or so.
Too bad we cant see the video my friend. Anyway, moving on, taking the description you have on this and the effect you got reminds me of an apparatus which I read from my uncles book which was publish in the 1950"s. He has magazines too that has the design of the current stealth planes. Too bad I cant show them coz they were gutted down by termites.
Yes, the field from the saucers always screwed up the professional video-cameras (using 15-year old technology) could not take the field from the saucers, and unfortunately the only tape we had that someone at the conference gave us was duct-tape, which conducted in bib-long sparks until they shorted out one of our multiplier units. I plan to re-do and re-film this experiment late this year, especially for YouTube, to quell all doubts that this is electrogravitc propulsion and not ion-wind.
Yes, since the late 1980s, I've been basically re-doing government work from the 1930s, 40s and 50s, which was CLASSIFIED and secretised by the US Air Force in 1955, after witnessing a test of 3-foot saucers powerd with only a few watts that had no limit to speed, and after tests in 1955 in Paris,France that flew MORE efficiently at less than a billionth of an atmosphere.Classification removed in 1995, and the electrogravitic B2 Pirit "stealth" bomber revealed to the public.
Right, matey! As said in THE RIGHT STUFF: "No Bucks, no Buck Rogers". This is GREEN propulsion technology. Under the current administration in Washington DC, Alternative Energy and propulsion is getting a much-needed boost. Which creates J O B S.
How can you be associated with flying saucers and employment at the same time. Why do you fail to see the irony. It makes me think you're a shill. I hope I'm wrong.
I have been researching flying saucers and their flightmeans since 1969, with a heavy-emphasis on physics in college in the early 1980s, and force-field propulsion since 1982. I first built these TT Brown saucers in 1990. We are basically re-doing govt. work from the 1940s and 50s, in the public-eye. This effect is overunity, and violates the 1st law of thermodynamics, in that more kinetic-energy is created than equivalent in input electrical-energy.
Is there some kind of repository where I can go look at your work? It doesn't really matter what it is, white papers, whatever. I'm good at reverse engineering alien devices. I can tell you if you're on the right path or not, i find a lot of physicists are still ground to earth.
My work is all over the web. I won Applied Electrogravitics since 1999, and you can see photos of my work on Professor John Searl's Swallowcommand site, google BEAMSHIP TECHNOLOGY, my telephone interview with Tim Ventura from 2004 is on American Antigravity website, a couple of my published papers are online, photos of my work are in science books, magazines and journals, Jean-Louis Naudin's webside starting in 1999, etc. See the work and a lot more here in Philadelphia July 10-12.
OMG, my uncle's books could be worth a fortune of knowledge. By your admission, you are basically re-doing govt work from the 1940 and 50s. I still have a couple of those magazines and the book back home.
There is MUCH much more. We've only scratched the surface of my successful electrogravity (WARP drive) research. Other scientists and researchers have requested my data and results of my research, which I have presented and published over the last ten years. This presentation was 9, years ago, June 24th, 2000, in downtown Reno Nevada, at the Reno Library, where this 2nd Antigravity conference was hosted by Jim Cox of ANTIGRAVITY AND SPACEDRIVE NEWS.
Free inexhaustible energy is real!But the Big corporations spend millions to ensure that information does not spread to the masses,Get a real free energy motor at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM ,Be the revolution!
checksummedchest 1 year ago
This experiment needs to be repeated with better video and test equipment. I would really like to see a bagged lifter on a gram scale and see if there is a reduction in weight. Further more you could attach an unbagged lifter to the scale with a string, record the reduction in weight. Compare that with the bagged lifter results to calculate what percentage ion wind and electrogravitic propulsion each contribute to lift.
ronmann606 2 years ago
Obviously, these experiments we did 10-11 years ago will be repeated, as planned, this spring and summer 2010.
Beamshipcaptain 2 years ago
@Beamshipcaptain Its strange how I printed these patents off of the US patent office, I've just begun the understanding of how this propulsion system works.
Apparently Dr. TT Brown back in the day, he noted with factual evidence that this Electrokinetic Device worked much better in a vacuum, And yes it does work in the Earths Atmosphere, however, it will only work better with Dr Henry W. Wallaces MagnetoHydroDynamic Propulsion system along with the Electrokinetic propulsion system.
arshdeep125 1 year ago
@arshdeep125 Yes of COURSE it works better in vacuum! The controversy stems from the fact that NASA confirmed this,ten years ago, then seems to have been put under a "gag" order since then, despite the fact that new patents were issued! Takaaki Musha confirmed increased efficiency in vacuum, and John Fiala, one of my AEG clients, confirmed Beamship Vacuum operation, this past summer in New Mexico. We can use this technology to explore the STARS, since it has no inertia, this is WARP DRIVE.
Beamshipcaptain 1 year ago
@Beamshipcaptain Yes, However IT is NOT warp drive. It's nothing close to a warp drive. You have to travel in a worm hole which is slightly faster than the speed of light, without the time and space limit and aging. There is a patent which involves opening in hyper space, Now, as you travel into hyperspace, you can travel at SUPER LUMINOUS Velocities. Yes there is a warp drive, however I have no proof of its existence, because All i've seen is a Hyperspace travel patent.
arshdeep125 1 year ago
@arshdeep125 actually it is a form of warp drive. Warp drive "warp" space time before and behind the craft travelling. What warps space-time? Massive objects like planets stars and black holes. What else can warp space time? Energy. Why? because E=mc2. Think about it. In the case of tt brown the energy is voltage. Enough Voltage or potential gradient warps space time in the similar manner that planets and black holes can. Furthermore, black holes effectively stop time because of the massive warp
trendsetter37 6 days ago
@trendsetter37 light cannot escape the event horizon because of the amount of spacetime warping of a black hole. You CAN warp space time to this amount by using voltage as well. Simple.
trendsetter37 6 days ago
@trendsetter37 Exactly right. You can either warp spacetime with a lot of massin a small space, or alot of energyin a small space. Energy and mass are EQUIVALENT.That iswhy high energy electrostatics, or electromagnetic toroids produce artificial gravitationfor propulsive effect. BUT,since ever atom of mass within the forcefield moves at the sme rate, inertial mass is canceled out. Gravitational mass stays the same. But without inertia, lightspeed is no longer a barrier!
andflood 6 days ago
@andflood Ahhh it all makes sense! This epiphany is so profound...I used to think the cabins of a ufo were unique in that they had to counteract inertia. Are you conducting experiments at home?
trendsetter37 6 days ago
@andflood wait this means you would have to be "inside" the electrogravitic device right? One that used a conducting exterior for the electric potentials. Also meaning you couldn't create an electrogravitic hover board? Well you could but you would feel the inertia right?
trendsetter37 6 days ago
@Beamshipcaptain How does it not have inertia? Is it because you are basically falling? i.e. falling towards which ever way space-time is warped (gravity)?
trendsetter37 6 days ago
@trendsetter37 In this type of propulsion, every atom and molecule of mass within the superimpsed electricalfield moves at the same rate.There is no "freight cars effect" of motionbeing translated from one part of the model to another part and so on. This is not internalcombustion or even mag-lev. Instant starts and stops and right angle turns at any speed would not be felt. This does not violate any laws of physics. Its because of the nature of forcefield propulsion.
andflood 6 days ago
Not sure but I think I can solve your problem of your instrument playing havoc on your video. If you are interested send me a message.
alienpatentoffice 2 years ago
I was'nt the one doing the taping, it was an outfit called Soundphotosynthesis, and they had a sophisticated two-camera setup, using analog video, with long cables all over, and a control-console. Modern Equipment is hardier, more self-contained, wireless, and no black-out problems created by electrostatic-induction.
Beamshipcaptain 2 years ago
i didnt see when its flying
OVARLI 2 years ago
We and all the witnesses present saw the saucers start moving in the opposite direction, but evrytime we initially power up the saucers,the field emanating from the saucers playes havoc with the audio-video for 10-seconds, or so.
Beamshipcaptain 2 years ago
Too bad we cant see the video my friend. Anyway, moving on, taking the description you have on this and the effect you got reminds me of an apparatus which I read from my uncles book which was publish in the 1950"s. He has magazines too that has the design of the current stealth planes. Too bad I cant show them coz they were gutted down by termites.
alienpatentoffice 2 years ago
Yes, the field from the saucers always screwed up the professional video-cameras (using 15-year old technology) could not take the field from the saucers, and unfortunately the only tape we had that someone at the conference gave us was duct-tape, which conducted in bib-long sparks until they shorted out one of our multiplier units. I plan to re-do and re-film this experiment late this year, especially for YouTube, to quell all doubts that this is electrogravitc propulsion and not ion-wind.
Beamshipcaptain 2 years ago
Yes, since the late 1980s, I've been basically re-doing government work from the 1930s, 40s and 50s, which was CLASSIFIED and secretised by the US Air Force in 1955, after witnessing a test of 3-foot saucers powerd with only a few watts that had no limit to speed, and after tests in 1955 in Paris,France that flew MORE efficiently at less than a billionth of an atmosphere.Classification removed in 1995, and the electrogravitic B2 Pirit "stealth" bomber revealed to the public.
Beamshipcaptain 2 years ago
it failed to fly, it just move.
alienpatentoffice 2 years ago
been their done that. good but still needs major funding to get off the ground. "no pun intended".
sparten1114 2 years ago 3
Right, matey! As said in THE RIGHT STUFF: "No Bucks, no Buck Rogers". This is GREEN propulsion technology. Under the current administration in Washington DC, Alternative Energy and propulsion is getting a much-needed boost. Which creates J O B S.
Beamshipcaptain 2 years ago
How can you be associated with flying saucers and employment at the same time. Why do you fail to see the irony. It makes me think you're a shill. I hope I'm wrong.
part2themovie 2 years ago
I have been researching flying saucers and their flightmeans since 1969, with a heavy-emphasis on physics in college in the early 1980s, and force-field propulsion since 1982. I first built these TT Brown saucers in 1990. We are basically re-doing govt. work from the 1940s and 50s, in the public-eye. This effect is overunity, and violates the 1st law of thermodynamics, in that more kinetic-energy is created than equivalent in input electrical-energy.
Beamshipcaptain 2 years ago
Is there some kind of repository where I can go look at your work? It doesn't really matter what it is, white papers, whatever. I'm good at reverse engineering alien devices. I can tell you if you're on the right path or not, i find a lot of physicists are still ground to earth.
part2themovie 2 years ago
My work is all over the web. I won Applied Electrogravitics since 1999, and you can see photos of my work on Professor John Searl's Swallowcommand site, google BEAMSHIP TECHNOLOGY, my telephone interview with Tim Ventura from 2004 is on American Antigravity website, a couple of my published papers are online, photos of my work are in science books, magazines and journals, Jean-Louis Naudin's webside starting in 1999, etc. See the work and a lot more here in Philadelphia July 10-12.
Beamshipcaptain 2 years ago
OMG, my uncle's books could be worth a fortune of knowledge. By your admission, you are basically re-doing govt work from the 1940 and 50s. I still have a couple of those magazines and the book back home.
alienpatentoffice 2 years ago 3
I think Im officially hooked. I cant stop researching this stuff! Subscribed!
cobrala 2 years ago 8
I didn't know you have had more :-)
Hansolo60 2 years ago
There is MUCH much more. We've only scratched the surface of my successful electrogravity (WARP drive) research. Other scientists and researchers have requested my data and results of my research, which I have presented and published over the last ten years. This presentation was 9, years ago, June 24th, 2000, in downtown Reno Nevada, at the Reno Library, where this 2nd Antigravity conference was hosted by Jim Cox of ANTIGRAVITY AND SPACEDRIVE NEWS.
Beamshipcaptain 2 years ago