I have started my own religion and it has many Gods. The late Dave Thomas, CEO and major share holder of Wendys (who just passed Burger King as fast food giant number 2 next to Mc donalds) is our main God with Dawkins, Marilyn Manson and Peter Griffin as our prophets.
JESUS CHRIST, HIS CATHOLIC-UNIVERSAL-APOSTOLIC CHURCH, SACRAMENTS, THE BIBLE, MIRACLES, HEALINGS, ST. MARY APPARITIONS, MESSAGES FROM HEAVEN, SIGNS IN 2011 ARE NOT A MYTHOLOGY BUT THE REALITY !!!
Dead-to-the-spirit deluded "God Delusion" author & blithering fool scientist goon Richard Dawkins another "leader" given 2 the profane masses is another useful idiot 4 Jesuit machinations
Jesuitical; pertaining to the Jesuits or their principals; designing; cunning; deceitful; prevaricating
The Jesuit Order completely altered the education system 2 suit their Evo-Hoax Agenda to discredit the Bible
Papal Rome cant have their Counter Reformation 2nd Dark Age DESPOTISM until Bible is destroyed
I still worship Thor. With Natalie Portman on his side, I think that's evidence enough. However I mean not to discredit the video with humor. I love Richard Dawkins and, just today, have been through 3-4 hours of him talk on youtube. Background audio, of course, I am getting other things done.
1) Lunchtime discussion on Oxford on the 'Oxford Debate'
2) "Is God a Delusion?" lecture with panel response (unless Dawkins shows up to debate!)
Run, Dawkins, run!! Keep running from Dr. Craig, from debate, from truth. That's the best thing you can do to keep your followers!!!!!!!!
In case you followers don't know, he's been avoiding Dr. Craig, for he... is afraid to death of debating him!!! LOL... Even an atheist publicly accused him of cowardice!!!
Topics: DEADLY ARGUMENTS NOW ADDED For The Creationism-Evolutionism Debate (See Subchapter 10.2.2.), The Issue On The Criminal Liability Of Foretelling The END OF THE WORLD, Other Debated Issues, Terrorism, War, Law, Politics, Religion, Philosophy, Science, Others.
Websites: balanceddiet1.yolasite.com
See Figure 4, which is THE MEANING OF THE PYRAMID, at figure4etc.yolasite.com
See Announcements at announcements-balancedway.weebly.com
@ldooart I've come to realise that you are absolutely right about this. Wish I'd realised what you were telling me was actually true way back two years ago. I only recently came to this conclusion myself. Atheist simply means "without religious belief / belief in god(s)". Anyway - belatedly at least, I can tell you I concur.
@zerr0w i cant back it up or mean to argue but i heard that it was a relative of the fig thats now extinct. i was told that modern stories use the apple as just an image that kids can relate to. just something i heard. im an atheist and dont really care about boogymen stories anyway so just saying.
Dawkins most certainly relates lack of intelligence to religious belief 16 minutes into another Youtube talk of his called An atheist's call to arms. If Dawkins really has to speak publicly I wish he would at least actually attempt to provide some evidence for evolution rather than always run down Christianity by making fun of it. His method is not intellectually satisfying.
@MrMalcie On the contrary, making fun of Christianity is, well, fun and indeed satisfying. If you need someone to explain evolution to you, go read a fucking book. You comment has indeed provided more evidence to the claim that religion and a lack of intelligence most certainly have a causal relationship.
Because it requires faith. Faith is the belief in something without evidence or against the evidence to the contrary and is therefore irrational and illogical.
@seansalvador1 Does all the evidence really point only to a physical world without any spiritual dimension? Does the evidence support Man is simply an animal and yet He enjoys love, music, poetry, demonstrates morality and seeks spiritual meaning (eg in religions)?
Dawkins always tries to convice people how implausible it is to believe in God and how those who do must have a lower intelligence. I actually think evolution is implausible and unintelligene. Listening to the evolutionist's explanation of how Giraffe's got their long necks or how elephants evolves trunks are the funniest fairytale stories you'll ever hear. So much of evolution is based upon assumptions with no evidence and yet is taught as those it were fact.
@MrMalcie Those "fairytale stories" are less absurd than believing that a magical being that looks like a man somehow created an extremely complex universe. When did Dawkins say or even imply that people who believe in God have a lower intelligence? He is simply saying that maybe evidence should be valued more than faith.
@jesushant The burden of proof in such cases is always placed on theists such as yourself. If my neighbour asserts that there is a 3 foot goblin living in his garden, with an invisibility cloak which bends light and allows him not to be seen, it is his responsibility to prove it.
Also, how do you know that all of the suffering in the world - poverty, famine, disease, abuse, murder, tsunamis, climate change etc. - isn't punishment for your rejection of Zeus and other polytheistic deities?
people are constantly telling me that if im afraid of going to hell for being an atheist....and my respond is "fuck no". first, there is no proof of a place called hell (its not on google maps) and second, i choose to live a live where i dont have to be a mindless turd, and live in fear of "god" punishing me for fucking my girlfriend with a condom!
There actually is a place called Hell. It is a lovely little village in Norway. No one ever saw a red man with horns, except when there was a carnival on.
I've just uploaded a debate between Richard Dawkins and John Lennox! Check out my channel or search for -> "Has Science Buried God?" - Richard Dawkins vs John Lennox debate (1/8)
I'll talk purely philosophical, because all nature science have a long time ago totally proved the existence of God. Btw it is not a coincidence that all great natural scientist had believed in God. So what's the meaning of atheism - it means that the man is a certain type of evolved stochastic sequence of atoms, whit the ability of reproducing, which existence has no meaning or purpose. So ask yourselves 1. why you live;2.why would you be good;3.why not killing the whole world; and etc...
@BeLieVeR11111 I would like to answer your questions: 1. I live because my biological functions are met. 2. If by “good” you mean do what it says in the bible, then my answer is I wouldn’t, if be good you mean obeying the low and being nice then to not get in trouble with the police and have a social life. 3. Because it would be bad for the propagation of species if and individual killed all other specimens, and there aren’t benefits in killing people.
@BeLieVeR11111 I want to ask you some questions in return, if you don’t mind. 1. Why do I continue existing in heaven or hell (since if what you say is true that’s where I’m going)? 2. Why should or shouldn’t I do things such as burning my house, offering my toes to charity etc. in your interpretation of God?
@BeLieVeR11111 science has proved God made us it was mathematically impossible for evolution to work any mathematician can do the numbers for you it was impossible with out God. long ago people worship the sun and the moon now again the worship the universe they think that's there creator blind God forgive them keep going with christ my friend
@MMAGUY13 Please elaborate on how it is mathematically impossible for us to come into existence without the aid of a God/Gods. And even if you were to show that, how does that prove that the diety behind our existance is the Christian God and not, for example, Allah
@Jshect hi i seen the odds on evolution in many videos you can google it yourself david berlinski for one it rules out chance for the first cell coming alive and for random mutation so if evolution happen you cant say it was chance. now with why a christian GOD we have fulfilled prophecy of israel and for jesus in the bible what other book told the future christ rose when its debated it cant be explain away i seen angels. this is some of the reason i believe
@jotegoyo evolution is a myth you need increase infomation in the dna to go from one species to another. random mutation destroys already existing infomation. try it yourself keep trying to create a new sentence out of a existing sentence the more letters you destroy the less sense it makes. who wrote the infomation in dna in the first place infomation only comes from a mind. nice judo video on your web site
@MMAGUY13 , it doesn't work like that. Think of something very similar: how languages evolve. Spanish, French, Italian, they all come from latin and they have developed grammar that was not present in latin (like the articles) and they have lost other grammar. Vocabulary has also changed dramatically. A Spanish person today couldn't talk to a Roman. But he can talk to his father, and his father to his and so on until you find a Roman who speaks latin.
@jotegoyo to go from one language to another you need change to change you need to add so much new information not destroy old information you could never get a whole new language by destroying the letters in the old language it would never make sense like our dna it makes perfect sense because a super intelligent agent programed it he knew how to make man one amino acid after another
A lot of information is actually lost when languages evolved. Latin declensions are gone in Spanish, etc. DNA is one of the most awesome evidence of evolution. DNA analysis and experiments just on their own proof evolution. On top of that, they agree with all the other evidence. You seem to be stuck with the idea of mutation=destroy, whereas mutation=different is what really happens. DNA from an information theory point of view, is a clumsy code, not anything an intelligent designer would do.
@jotegoyo language changing is a intelligent mind at work look at 2 languages its not information destroyed its new information like 2 species you have to add new information not just take away some letters if you do that you will be left with something that makes no sense, dna is not clumsy it speaks with intent and it is so complex to be able to make a man is way beyond our years in technology screw with our dna like fruit flies only bad will come nothing better
@jotegoyo it would be like taking a romance book take out some letters and turning it into a astronomy book that makes sense it would never happen you need someone with a mind to add information that makes sense not take away add. besides all this random mutation is not pass on it stops at the parent and lucky for us or all species would perish quite quickly
@MMAGUY13 . Well, it is pretty easy to write a program that randomly changes letters in a book by one position in the alphabet (mutation) and then favor the letters that are closer to the final book (natural selection) you want. If you do it purely random, it will pretty much never work. Add natural selection and in just a few generations you get the other book. If you know about software and understand evolution it is a pretty straight forward exercise.
@jotegoyo and random mutation takes away information your adding letters mutations does not add NEW INFOMATION so try to make a different book that makes sense like a romance novel to a dictionary it cant happen it didnot happen or will ever happen and how did information get in dna in the first place when infomation only comes from a mind
@jotegoyo can I say something with out interrupting to much??? DNA from an information theory point of view is a clumsy code....... when are you saying modern man appeared and sence than there has been no major change? thats alot of information transfered, only a good system could do that.
@joywonder , information theory as formulated by Shannon; i.e. the reason FM/AM and your wifi radio links work. DNA is clumsy because it contains repeated codes, null codes, most of it is never used (no meaning) and the correction mechanism is poor. A telecommunications engineer would have been fired if he designed such a code. But, from an evolution point of view, it is good enough. BTW, of course there is a lot of change, but it is gradual. Look at elephant horns getting shorter due to hunting
@jotegoyo its funny you use that example when they tried random mutation on a computer it crash you cant take away information without harm for a computer to work you need to add information with intellect evolution a myth try christ i seen angels its real GOD exist
@MMAGUY13 , well, well, now you have surprised me. I must tell you that genetics algorithms are used daily to do things such as plan the cell phone network. If your mobile phone is because random mutation and natural selection in computers works very well. I don't really get why you start talking about religion though. I thought we were having an intellectual conversation.
@jotegoyo and even the rare event of a good mutations like being immune to malaria that's good but it makes the person a physically weak person so he is immune but has other health problems. and you didn't answer my question on where did the information come from in dna when information only comes from a mind and if species change to others where are the transitional fossils
@jotegoyo do you really want to use elephants as an example, men shoot the ones with big tusks which are the bigger elephants. that takes them out of the gene pool.man has uncoded dna with in the last 25 years of course they don t know much of what everything does. Man still has two hands two eyes ect. no real change good system
@joywonder . Shooting elephants with big tusks favours the propagation of genes for small tusks. That's natural selection with humans as predators. There are elephant especies in Asia without tusks. Coincedence? People still have two hands but some people in Africa were AIDS is killing loads of people have developed immunity against it and it seems to run in the family. That sounds like a mutation. Haven't you seen babies with 6 toes?
@jotegoyo it has nothing to do with evolution,,,, natural selection yes just as the black plauge didn t kill everyone neigher did the spanish flu some people have a resistance to it but that is not evolution because there is no real change in the spiecies.
@joywonder i know about natural selection the one who survive passes on his genes the one who dies does not but that doent create the genes in the first place. most all mutation are harmful this would destroy all of us but mutations are not pass on almost always. there is no proof whats so ever that mutations can change on species to another. given that mutations are 99 percent harmful look for another way evolution could of happened because this theory doesn't come close
@MMAGUY13 Sorry I jumped into your conversation but I didn t like jotegoyo saying dna was a bad system when in fact there are 7 billion people on the earth that mostly look the same as the 3 or 4 billion people in the past. what a good system dna is. you two carry on
@joywonder i was gratefull for your input yes dna has a sytem to stop mutation then it makes it almost impossible to pass mutation on 99 percent of mutation are bad and the 1 out of the hundred that is good makes the creature bad in other ways and mutation does not change the species if i ram a car into a tree i dont get a airplane he couldnt awsere the question how info got in dna when info comes from a mind
@MMAGUY13 well sir thank you for you brief on mutations, talking about the mind science doesn t know where origanal thought came from. I mean apes think, food sex food sex food sex protect family, i am third in line,,, man thinks very very very very very differently, why, science doesn t know maybe it was fire.
@joywonder they don't know where our thoughts come from they can zap areas of your brain and make you move different parts of your body but they cant make thoughts happen. there another study that prick your finger your brain picks it up but you have a delay in feeling it. your conscious uses your brain to observe the world but it is immaterial
@joywonder they don't know where our thoughts come from they can zap areas of your brain and make you move different parts of your body but they cant make thoughts happen. there another study that prick your finger your brain picks it up but you have a delay in feeling it. your conscious uses your brain to observe the world but it is immaterial
@joywonder they don't know where our thoughts come from they can zap areas of your brain and make you move different parts of your body but they cant make thoughts happen. there another study that prick your finger your brain picks it up but you have a delay in feeling it. your conscious uses your brain to observe the world but it is immaterial it is not the same as the brain
That is incorrect. Damage to specific areas of the brain causes predictable effects on the consciousness. All neuroscience points to the fact that consciousness is a high level product of the physical brain.
@MMAGUY13 actually think for one moment about what you are saying. You are saying that a whopping 1% of mutations are beneficial! Imagine that you knew what you were talking about then you would realize that even if that were compared with just 1% of cancers. That would be quite a large sum every year. In reality the beneficial mutations are much less frequent. The number does not need to be high.
@jotegoyo "some people in Africa were AIDS is killing loads of people have developed immunity against it and it seems to run in the family. That sounds like a mutation."
Infodump: yes it is. It's a mutated recessive gene, whose damage disables the creation of the CCR5 receptor in the surface of cells; its absence prevents the virus from entering into the cell and taking it over. A great example of a "damaging" mutation with beneficial effects. Good to remember.
dawkin has answers already prepared for his audience people just about ask the same questions all the time so he has something clever ready for them. he wasted his life spreading his false doctrine. something had to exist to start all this the universe did not exist at on point so what made the universe didn't need matter or space so is it so hard to believe what started it was a mind? I've seen angels so to me i don't have faith Gods real i know
@MMAGUY13 that's because someone payed him a lot of money for this purpose. The markets are interested the people not to believe in God. When the people have no other reason to live, except to "consuming", it's very easy to see that someone will become terribly rich :). Have no fear, my brother!!!
AT 4:00 quantum mechanics is certainly imposing. But an inner voice tells me that it is not yet the real thing. The thoery says a lot, but does not really bring us any closer to the secret of the old one. I at any rate am convinced He does not throw dice. Albert Enistein does that sound poetic. D.is a propaganda machine.
I dont see what sexuality has to do with being an atheist. Being gay or straight has nothing in common with believeing in a god/gods. Plenty of gay believe in a form of god this is just you being an ignorant twat.
atheist=a demonym referring only to people who don't accept the existence of deities and nothing else.
homosexuals=a demonym referring to people with a sexual preference for members of their own sex and nothing else.
To conflate them is a logic fail, Priests go after little boys all the time and inmates who are statistically more likely to be religious, get raped all the time. Not to confuse association with causation, I recognize that it's not necessarily part of the theology-
-but it does highlight the empirical data that suggests that homosexuality and rape is more rampant among the religious despite the condemnation of it among most of their denominations and the largely indifferent reception to homosexuality if not rape, among the irreligious.
Atheist=gay rapist (low probability)
Religious=gay rapist (high probability)
Religious gay rapist=hypocritical menace to humanity.
Dear Christians, prepubescent youths are for educating and NOT molestation. :)
-maybe that was a bit hamfisted, not all religious people are evil retards despite the dictates of their theologies. You know who you are and whether the above applies to you or not.
I think Richard Dawkins has a stance about religion and he spends a great deal of time explaining his stance in a clever way.
I have a very simple approach to life. I do not listen to other people about religion. I have my own, Am I going to share it , i don`t think so apart from a few examples. Do I respect others religion, yes I do, do I want others religion no I don`t. My examples are let others have their religions and let them get on with it so long as they don`t impose on you.
@ottou22 of course he was born into religion then why doesn t he stop his whining about people always being what their parents were please sense you know him so well ask him to please shut up over that, it is such a mis-direction I got called dumb ass by a superior atheist mind over it.
god, i love him too!! lolol I bought his book. i commented on another video about making fun of religion: atheist ppl never try to impose their beliefs on other ppl like religious ppl do.... So my bf and i got into a huge argument in the subway station and i knew he just hated my book (he claims to be a christian) he snatched it out of my had and threw it into the train tracks! lmao! religion is so confusing and deceiving it harbors anger...!! lol
When he gets into the scale stuff, sometimes I think "Fuck, why do people care about an abstract scale like this?"
Other than that, I like his stuff, generally. I feel like sometimes dealing with religion is such a large part of his life that he kind of assumes that everyone cares about it as much as he does.
I care about it and am glad he's fighting, but on that scale I don't take a position, though its somewhere closer to 6 or 7. I don't know that there's no God, but I've seen no evidence.
valu777, I added up all the "begats" in the Bible, and came up with about 6,000 years old for the age of the Earth. Like Ussher back in the 17th century, when I got to about Isaac, things got foggy, so I had to make some assumptions...oh, shoot, sorry! My bad I forgot! You said I couldn't use "assumptive data". Come to think of it, I assumed right from the start that the Bible was literal fact without any evidence to support my assumption, didn't I? Oops! You're right, valu, this is hard!
"Our desire to be connected to the cosmos reflects a profound reality. We are connected not in the trivial ways astrology promises but in the deepest ways."
He meant we arent just living in the universe, we are the universe. Our molecules are star guts, our bodies animated using harvested energy of the sun. That reality is more powerful then any religion.
Humans are nothing but a bunch of tadpoles at the bottom of a well, going through metamorphosis to become frogs so that one day they would look up and said to themselves, "the sky is not that big."
"God" is an idea created to control the thoughts and behaviors of humans. That said, humans are silly creatures who need their thoughts and behaviors controlled.
Ah, yes, homochirality. That's the new little gap of scientific knowledge God occupies now, 5tony? He busies himself making little protein and amino acid molecules and such left-handed or right-handed? "I'll show the non-believers! I'll hide the evidence of my existence and intervention in a molecular orientation bias! HA HA! I am a great and important god! Fear me or I will flip your enzymes like an omelet for all eternity!"
@godforbacon atheists GOSPEL OF GUESSWORK There is no formula for the age of the earth or evolution that is free from Guesswork ,assumptive data input (if we are wrong post the method / formula?????)
this confirms science in these fields =GUESSWORK only
Atheist / science use the gospel of guesswork
here is a challenge!
Give the age of the earth or evolution
without utilising assumptive data to calculate it?
ASSUMPTIONS WILL TAKE YOU TO THE LAKE OF FIRE are you sure?
His Book "The God Delusion" is amazing, I read the whole thing and it really changed my thinking. For those who haven't read it, Go ahead and Download the e-book, It's a must read full of Humor and Hardcore facts about why Dawkins thinks God cannot exist !
Dawkins should add the awesome words of Richard Feynman who said,"God was invented to explain mystery. God is always invented to explain those things that you do not understand. Now, when you finally discover how something works, you get some laws which you're taking away from God; you don't need him anymore. But you need him for the other mysteries. So therefore you leave him to create the universe because we haven't figured that out yet"
As much as I hate those dislike button comments I have to make one here... 34 credulous fools clinging to their unscientific creationism, afraid of a rational thinker!!
The same half-minded creationist that believes humans coincided with dinosaurs, and that the world is under 10 000 years old... He would have to be half-minded! :)
Free inexhaustible energy is real!But there are very powerfull forces that want to supress the technology,Get the blueprints for a free energy motor at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM ,Be part of the revolution!
I very much admire Dawkins for being one of the few scientists willing to take the bull by the horns and make a public stand on behalf of reason and intellectual integrity. But I thinks he hurts himself by having too broad a focus and not burrowing down immediately to the real problem. It isn't about whether the universe would "look different with a god." It's about dogmatism, anti-intellectualism, and indoctrination versus reason, skepticism, and critical thinking.
It quickly becomes painfully obvious that most people could not care less about the origins of the universe. Their only religious impulse is for a faith that provides comfort, belonging, and the illusion of some degree of control over their lives. Find me one well-populated church that worships God the Supremely Indifferent.
ONLY THE CATHOLIC CHURCH IS THE TRUE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST, APOSTOLIC CHURCH PROVIDES ALL SACRAMENTS AND THE MOST IMPORTANT ONE - OF THE LIVING GOD - THE BREAD OF LIFE IN THE EUCHARIST!
WITH 2,000 YEARS OF TRADITION AND SACRIFICES OF CHRISTIANS TODAY WE KNOW WHAT THE BIBLE AND SALVATION THROUGH JESUS CHRIST IS.
MANY PROPHECIES AND VISIONARIES.
THE REAL MIRACLES, EFFECTIVE EXORCISMS, INCCORUPT BODIES OF SAINTS,
THIS IS PROOF THAT ONLY CATHOLIC CHURCH IS TRUE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST AND HIS HOLY SACRAMENTS!!!
youtube. com/ watch?v =jqsRDD6kXWY
While they were eating, Jesus took bread, gave thanks and broke it, and gave it to his disciples, saying, "Take and eat; this is my body." Then he took the cup, gave thanks and offered it to them, saying, "Drink from it, all of you. This is my blood of the covenant, which is poured out for many for the forgiveness of sins." Matthew 26:26-28
9:00 Concerning faeries i am also near "6". But towards belief in God i am at exactly "7". Something that is ill defined can not exist. Every believer makes up something else, all inconsistent, contradicting beliefs that are as vague as possible only to not be disprovable. if its infalsifiable it cant exist.
I'm happy to see that religious people don't dominate these videos and channels. On the other hand it seems that not many religious people even care to look at events like this, too bad... for them.
@Drakon222 if they did, their minds wouldnt be changed. And those that fear they would have their minds changed would either lash out or stop listening. In another lecture presented by Richard Dawkins to a more mixed assembly of many religous students/teachers. When Dawkins was talking early on quite a few students (religous students) got up from their seats and left the lecture theatre, not being able to accept the truth laid out before them.
That's because Dawkings just focuses on wether or not religion is true.. which isn't really that interesting if you're a somewhat secularized christian..
I have started my own religion and it has many Gods. The late Dave Thomas, CEO and major share holder of Wendys (who just passed Burger King as fast food giant number 2 next to Mc donalds) is our main God with Dawkins, Marilyn Manson and Peter Griffin as our prophets.
Metalmanmania357 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
JESUS CHRIST, HIS CATHOLIC-UNIVERSAL-APOSTOLIC CHURCH, SACRAMENTS, THE BIBLE, MIRACLES, HEALINGS, ST. MARY APPARITIONS, MESSAGES FROM HEAVEN, SIGNS IN 2011 ARE NOT A MYTHOLOGY BUT THE REALITY !!!
GET READY FOR THE GREAT WARNING NOW!!!
thewarningsecondcoming . com
JezusSlave 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
nice video! thanks
adelle0001 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Dead-to-the-spirit deluded "God Delusion" author & blithering fool scientist goon Richard Dawkins another "leader" given 2 the profane masses is another useful idiot 4 Jesuit machinations
Jesuitical; pertaining to the Jesuits or their principals; designing; cunning; deceitful; prevaricating
The Jesuit Order completely altered the education system 2 suit their Evo-Hoax Agenda to discredit the Bible
Papal Rome cant have their Counter Reformation 2nd Dark Age DESPOTISM until Bible is destroyed
SpencerBenedict2nd 3 months ago
I still worship Thor. With Natalie Portman on his side, I think that's evidence enough. However I mean not to discredit the video with humor. I love Richard Dawkins and, just today, have been through 3-4 hours of him talk on youtube. Background audio, of course, I am getting other things done.
WHATxIxTHINK 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
England - Tue Oct 25, 2011
1) Lunchtime discussion on Oxford on the 'Oxford Debate'
2) "Is God a Delusion?" lecture with panel response (unless Dawkins shows up to debate!)
Run, Dawkins, run!! Keep running from Dr. Craig, from debate, from truth. That's the best thing you can do to keep your followers!!!!!!!!
In case you followers don't know, he's been avoiding Dr. Craig, for he... is afraid to death of debating him!!! LOL... Even an atheist publicly accused him of cowardice!!!
feanando 4 months ago in playlist UC Berkeley Event - Richard Dawkins
This has been flagged as spam show
NEW BOOK FOR DEBATES AND GOVERNANCE
Topics: DEADLY ARGUMENTS NOW ADDED For The Creationism-Evolutionism Debate (See Subchapter 10.2.2.), The Issue On The Criminal Liability Of Foretelling The END OF THE WORLD, Other Debated Issues, Terrorism, War, Law, Politics, Religion, Philosophy, Science, Others.
Websites: balanceddiet1.yolasite.com
See Figure 4, which is THE MEANING OF THE PYRAMID, at figure4etc.yolasite.com
See Announcements at announcements-balancedway.weebly.com
etc.
TheServiceWeb 5 months ago
00:11 to skip the intro..
henrah1981 6 months ago
40 ppl are not ateapotists
Fsyiic 7 months ago
@ldooart I've come to realise that you are absolutely right about this. Wish I'd realised what you were telling me was actually true way back two years ago. I only recently came to this conclusion myself. Atheist simply means "without religious belief / belief in god(s)". Anyway - belatedly at least, I can tell you I concur.
Vortex42 8 months ago 2
@Vortex42 Cheers, ldooart! Good luck in your venture going forward!
I, and all the other atheist will be at your back!
BunnyProle 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Keep up the good video work looking good. When you have time come
visit my channel!
hcgdiets0 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Keep up the good video work looking good. When you have time come
visit my channel!
FatReleaseSystem 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Keep up the good video work looking good. When you have time come
visit my channel!
StrikeTsunami 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Keep up the good video work looking good. When you have time come
visit my channel!
simplechocolatediet 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Keep up the good video work looking good. When you have time come
visit my channel!
TheNitricOxide 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Keep up the good video work looking good. When you have time come
visit my channel!
bestpreworkout 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Keep up the good video work looking good. When you have time come
visit my channel!
truehealthyproducts 8 months ago
for those who thinks their belief makes them feel superior are in fact inferior
Trancidonia 9 months ago
I wish we could preserve his talking head in a jar ala Futurama...
choongd 9 months ago
@zerr0w i cant back it up or mean to argue but i heard that it was a relative of the fig thats now extinct. i was told that modern stories use the apple as just an image that kids can relate to. just something i heard. im an atheist and dont really care about boogymen stories anyway so just saying.
SuperPimpjj 9 months ago
The video compilation "UFO Disclosure, Revelations & the 2012 Connection" ON
YOUTUBE is a disclosure of major lies and with held
information regarding life outside of Earth. The footage contains statements
from astronauts, American presidents, military personnel, politicians plus
credible news footage. The compilation contains revelations regarding
awareness of life beyond Earth along with it's current and ongoing presence
which is being hidden from the public + more.
Futurecop2012A 9 months ago
Dawkins most certainly relates lack of intelligence to religious belief 16 minutes into another Youtube talk of his called An atheist's call to arms. If Dawkins really has to speak publicly I wish he would at least actually attempt to provide some evidence for evolution rather than always run down Christianity by making fun of it. His method is not intellectually satisfying.
MrMalcie 9 months ago
@MrMalcie His latest book is totally devoted to evolution.
mymatryoshka 9 months ago
@MrMalcie On the contrary, making fun of Christianity is, well, fun and indeed satisfying. If you need someone to explain evolution to you, go read a fucking book. You comment has indeed provided more evidence to the claim that religion and a lack of intelligence most certainly have a causal relationship.
wilsopup 8 months ago
@wilsopup Heh, I'm starting to feel a little guilty though, as it is rather like making fun of retards.
DamLazyFuk 8 months ago
@MrMalcie
Actually it's to a lack of reason that Dawkins accuses religion of pointing. It requires one to surrender the faculty of reason/logic.
seansalvador1 8 months ago
@seansalvador1 why does believing in God mean you have to surrender the faculty of reason/logic?
MrMalcie 8 months ago
@MrMalcie
Because it requires faith. Faith is the belief in something without evidence or against the evidence to the contrary and is therefore irrational and illogical.
seansalvador1 8 months ago 2
@seansalvador1 Does all the evidence really point only to a physical world without any spiritual dimension? Does the evidence support Man is simply an animal and yet He enjoys love, music, poetry, demonstrates morality and seeks spiritual meaning (eg in religions)?
MrMalcie 8 months ago
@MrMalcie
Yes.
seansalvador1 8 months ago
@seansalvador1 Then I guess we disagree. I thank you for having a civil discussion on this matter which has often not been the case for me on here.
MrMalcie 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@MrMalcie
tell me then, if you disagree, what evidence is there for your 'spiritual dimension'?
seansalvador1 8 months ago
@MrMalcie
ofc all the evidence really points that. There are no "spiritual dimensions". that is just magic thinking.
Man is an animal. "just an animal"? what else would it be?
Other animals also enjoy love, music, morality and maybe some sort of sense of spirituality.
Just because you are incredulous, your assumptions don't make any of your arguments valid.
stop doing post hoc fallacies.
transtlantic 4 months ago
@MrMalcie
ofc all the evidence really points that. There are no "spiritual dimensions". that is just magic thinking.
Man is an animal. "just an animal"? what else would it be?
Other animals also enjoy love, music, morality and maybe some sort of sense of spirituality.
Just because you are incredulous, your assumptions don't make any of your arguments valid.
stop doing post hoc fallacies.
transtlantic 4 months ago
Dawkins always tries to convice people how implausible it is to believe in God and how those who do must have a lower intelligence. I actually think evolution is implausible and unintelligene. Listening to the evolutionist's explanation of how Giraffe's got their long necks or how elephants evolves trunks are the funniest fairytale stories you'll ever hear. So much of evolution is based upon assumptions with no evidence and yet is taught as those it were fact.
MrMalcie 9 months ago
@MrMalcie Those "fairytale stories" are less absurd than believing that a magical being that looks like a man somehow created an extremely complex universe. When did Dawkins say or even imply that people who believe in God have a lower intelligence? He is simply saying that maybe evidence should be valued more than faith.
corychivers 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Keep up the good video work looking good. When you have time come visit my channel!
truehealthyproducts 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Keep up the good video work looking good. When you have time come visit my channel!
FatReleaseSystem 10 months ago
"knowledge(ability to think) is cause of all doubt"and science is a knowledge and asks evidence for presence of God..
AND U ATHEISTs WILL NEVER ABLE TO DISPROVE GOD EVER!!
B'cz You all are using SCIENCE to disprove GOD which ADAM and EVE acquired when they ate that apple...Now disprove GOD!!??
**And due to science earth is sufferring from Global Warming!....
and we all christians will play with ur ashes and bones in heaven
jesushant 11 months ago
@jesushant Troll!
grayziehobbes 11 months ago
@jesushant The burden of proof in such cases is always placed on theists such as yourself. If my neighbour asserts that there is a 3 foot goblin living in his garden, with an invisibility cloak which bends light and allows him not to be seen, it is his responsibility to prove it.
Also, how do you know that all of the suffering in the world - poverty, famine, disease, abuse, murder, tsunamis, climate change etc. - isn't punishment for your rejection of Zeus and other polytheistic deities?
BRussellspouts 10 months ago
people are constantly telling me that if im afraid of going to hell for being an atheist....and my respond is "fuck no". first, there is no proof of a place called hell (its not on google maps) and second, i choose to live a live where i dont have to be a mindless turd, and live in fear of "god" punishing me for fucking my girlfriend with a condom!
DJfresh209 11 months ago 29
sorry for the typos i have shitty writing skills
DJfresh209 11 months ago
@JOfresh209 I fucked her with a stick, (she's too skeevy for me) LOL
malithe00 9 months ago
@DJfresh209
There actually is a place called Hell. It is a lovely little village in Norway. No one ever saw a red man with horns, except when there was a carnival on.
debottolfsen 9 months ago 24
@DJfresh209 There is a place called hell. It is in Michigan. Im not joking go ahead and google map it.
romperstompist 7 months ago 3
Ah, dawkins famous ' If you'd been born in...' Dawkins never ceases to amaze me
ThatKidWithTheVideos 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I've just uploaded a debate between Richard Dawkins and John Lennox! Check out my channel or search for -> "Has Science Buried God?" - Richard Dawkins vs John Lennox debate (1/8)
jonflatmo 11 months ago
"Has Science Buried God?" - Richard Dawkins vs John Lennox debate (1/8)
jonflatmo 11 months ago
Some hardcore derping going on in these comments
RockBandFAQ 11 months ago
I'll talk purely philosophical, because all nature science have a long time ago totally proved the existence of God. Btw it is not a coincidence that all great natural scientist had believed in God. So what's the meaning of atheism - it means that the man is a certain type of evolved stochastic sequence of atoms, whit the ability of reproducing, which existence has no meaning or purpose. So ask yourselves 1. why you live;2.why would you be good;3.why not killing the whole world; and etc...
BeLieVeR11111 1 year ago
@BeLieVeR11111 I would like to answer your questions: 1. I live because my biological functions are met. 2. If by “good” you mean do what it says in the bible, then my answer is I wouldn’t, if be good you mean obeying the low and being nice then to not get in trouble with the police and have a social life. 3. Because it would be bad for the propagation of species if and individual killed all other specimens, and there aren’t benefits in killing people.
deathphoenix37 1 year ago
@BeLieVeR11111 I want to ask you some questions in return, if you don’t mind. 1. Why do I continue existing in heaven or hell (since if what you say is true that’s where I’m going)? 2. Why should or shouldn’t I do things such as burning my house, offering my toes to charity etc. in your interpretation of God?
deathphoenix37 1 year ago
@BeLieVeR11111 science has proved God made us it was mathematically impossible for evolution to work any mathematician can do the numbers for you it was impossible with out God. long ago people worship the sun and the moon now again the worship the universe they think that's there creator blind God forgive them keep going with christ my friend
MMAGUY13 1 year ago
@MMAGUY13 Please elaborate on how it is mathematically impossible for us to come into existence without the aid of a God/Gods. And even if you were to show that, how does that prove that the diety behind our existance is the Christian God and not, for example, Allah
Jshect 1 year ago
@Jshect hi i seen the odds on evolution in many videos you can google it yourself david berlinski for one it rules out chance for the first cell coming alive and for random mutation so if evolution happen you cant say it was chance. now with why a christian GOD we have fulfilled prophecy of israel and for jesus in the bible what other book told the future christ rose when its debated it cant be explain away i seen angels. this is some of the reason i believe
MMAGUY13 11 months ago
@MMAGUY13 , it wasn't chance. Pick up a biology book and learn about natural selection.
jotegoyo 11 months ago
@jotegoyo evolution is a myth you need increase infomation in the dna to go from one species to another. random mutation destroys already existing infomation. try it yourself keep trying to create a new sentence out of a existing sentence the more letters you destroy the less sense it makes. who wrote the infomation in dna in the first place infomation only comes from a mind. nice judo video on your web site
MMAGUY13 11 months ago
@MMAGUY13 , it doesn't work like that. Think of something very similar: how languages evolve. Spanish, French, Italian, they all come from latin and they have developed grammar that was not present in latin (like the articles) and they have lost other grammar. Vocabulary has also changed dramatically. A Spanish person today couldn't talk to a Roman. But he can talk to his father, and his father to his and so on until you find a Roman who speaks latin.
jotegoyo 11 months ago
@jotegoyo to go from one language to another you need change to change you need to add so much new information not destroy old information you could never get a whole new language by destroying the letters in the old language it would never make sense like our dna it makes perfect sense because a super intelligent agent programed it he knew how to make man one amino acid after another
MMAGUY13 11 months ago
A lot of information is actually lost when languages evolved. Latin declensions are gone in Spanish, etc. DNA is one of the most awesome evidence of evolution. DNA analysis and experiments just on their own proof evolution. On top of that, they agree with all the other evidence. You seem to be stuck with the idea of mutation=destroy, whereas mutation=different is what really happens. DNA from an information theory point of view, is a clumsy code, not anything an intelligent designer would do.
jotegoyo 11 months ago
@jotegoyo language changing is a intelligent mind at work look at 2 languages its not information destroyed its new information like 2 species you have to add new information not just take away some letters if you do that you will be left with something that makes no sense, dna is not clumsy it speaks with intent and it is so complex to be able to make a man is way beyond our years in technology screw with our dna like fruit flies only bad will come nothing better
MMAGUY13 11 months ago
@jotegoyo it would be like taking a romance book take out some letters and turning it into a astronomy book that makes sense it would never happen you need someone with a mind to add information that makes sense not take away add. besides all this random mutation is not pass on it stops at the parent and lucky for us or all species would perish quite quickly
MMAGUY13 11 months ago
@MMAGUY13 . Well, it is pretty easy to write a program that randomly changes letters in a book by one position in the alphabet (mutation) and then favor the letters that are closer to the final book (natural selection) you want. If you do it purely random, it will pretty much never work. Add natural selection and in just a few generations you get the other book. If you know about software and understand evolution it is a pretty straight forward exercise.
jotegoyo 11 months ago
@jotegoyo and random mutation takes away information your adding letters mutations does not add NEW INFOMATION so try to make a different book that makes sense like a romance novel to a dictionary it cant happen it didnot happen or will ever happen and how did information get in dna in the first place when infomation only comes from a mind
MMAGUY13 11 months ago
@jotegoyo can I say something with out interrupting to much??? DNA from an information theory point of view is a clumsy code....... when are you saying modern man appeared and sence than there has been no major change? thats alot of information transfered, only a good system could do that.
joywonder 11 months ago
@joywonder , information theory as formulated by Shannon; i.e. the reason FM/AM and your wifi radio links work. DNA is clumsy because it contains repeated codes, null codes, most of it is never used (no meaning) and the correction mechanism is poor. A telecommunications engineer would have been fired if he designed such a code. But, from an evolution point of view, it is good enough. BTW, of course there is a lot of change, but it is gradual. Look at elephant horns getting shorter due to hunting
jotegoyo 11 months ago
@jotegoyo its funny you use that example when they tried random mutation on a computer it crash you cant take away information without harm for a computer to work you need to add information with intellect evolution a myth try christ i seen angels its real GOD exist
MMAGUY13 11 months ago
@MMAGUY13 , well, well, now you have surprised me. I must tell you that genetics algorithms are used daily to do things such as plan the cell phone network. If your mobile phone is because random mutation and natural selection in computers works very well. I don't really get why you start talking about religion though. I thought we were having an intellectual conversation.
jotegoyo 11 months ago
@jotegoyo and even the rare event of a good mutations like being immune to malaria that's good but it makes the person a physically weak person so he is immune but has other health problems. and you didn't answer my question on where did the information come from in dna when information only comes from a mind and if species change to others where are the transitional fossils
MMAGUY13 11 months ago
@jotegoyo do you really want to use elephants as an example, men shoot the ones with big tusks which are the bigger elephants. that takes them out of the gene pool.man has uncoded dna with in the last 25 years of course they don t know much of what everything does. Man still has two hands two eyes ect. no real change good system
joywonder 11 months ago
@joywonder . Shooting elephants with big tusks favours the propagation of genes for small tusks. That's natural selection with humans as predators. There are elephant especies in Asia without tusks. Coincedence? People still have two hands but some people in Africa were AIDS is killing loads of people have developed immunity against it and it seems to run in the family. That sounds like a mutation. Haven't you seen babies with 6 toes?
jotegoyo 11 months ago
@jotegoyo it has nothing to do with evolution,,,, natural selection yes just as the black plauge didn t kill everyone neigher did the spanish flu some people have a resistance to it but that is not evolution because there is no real change in the spiecies.
joywonder 11 months ago
@joywonder i know about natural selection the one who survive passes on his genes the one who dies does not but that doent create the genes in the first place. most all mutation are harmful this would destroy all of us but mutations are not pass on almost always. there is no proof whats so ever that mutations can change on species to another. given that mutations are 99 percent harmful look for another way evolution could of happened because this theory doesn't come close
MMAGUY13 11 months ago
@MMAGUY13 . I think you need to study biology, mathematics and physics before having this conversation.
jotegoyo 11 months ago
@MMAGUY13 Sorry I jumped into your conversation but I didn t like jotegoyo saying dna was a bad system when in fact there are 7 billion people on the earth that mostly look the same as the 3 or 4 billion people in the past. what a good system dna is. you two carry on
joywonder 11 months ago
@joywonder i was gratefull for your input yes dna has a sytem to stop mutation then it makes it almost impossible to pass mutation on 99 percent of mutation are bad and the 1 out of the hundred that is good makes the creature bad in other ways and mutation does not change the species if i ram a car into a tree i dont get a airplane he couldnt awsere the question how info got in dna when info comes from a mind
MMAGUY13 11 months ago
@MMAGUY13 well sir thank you for you brief on mutations, talking about the mind science doesn t know where origanal thought came from. I mean apes think, food sex food sex food sex protect family, i am third in line,,, man thinks very very very very very differently, why, science doesn t know maybe it was fire.
joywonder 11 months ago
@joywonder they don't know where our thoughts come from they can zap areas of your brain and make you move different parts of your body but they cant make thoughts happen. there another study that prick your finger your brain picks it up but you have a delay in feeling it. your conscious uses your brain to observe the world but it is immaterial
MMAGUY13 11 months ago
@MMAGUY13
You have obviously never heard of the problem of interaction.
seansalvador1 8 months ago
@joywonder they don't know where our thoughts come from they can zap areas of your brain and make you move different parts of your body but they cant make thoughts happen. there another study that prick your finger your brain picks it up but you have a delay in feeling it. your conscious uses your brain to observe the world but it is immaterial
MMAGUY13 11 months ago
@joywonder they don't know where our thoughts come from they can zap areas of your brain and make you move different parts of your body but they cant make thoughts happen. there another study that prick your finger your brain picks it up but you have a delay in feeling it. your conscious uses your brain to observe the world but it is immaterial it is not the same as the brain
MMAGUY13 11 months ago
@MMAGUY13
That is incorrect. Damage to specific areas of the brain causes predictable effects on the consciousness. All neuroscience points to the fact that consciousness is a high level product of the physical brain.
seansalvador1 8 months ago
@MMAGUY13 actually think for one moment about what you are saying. You are saying that a whopping 1% of mutations are beneficial! Imagine that you knew what you were talking about then you would realize that even if that were compared with just 1% of cancers. That would be quite a large sum every year. In reality the beneficial mutations are much less frequent. The number does not need to be high.
seansalvador1 8 months ago
@jotegoyo "some people in Africa were AIDS is killing loads of people have developed immunity against it and it seems to run in the family. That sounds like a mutation."
Infodump: yes it is. It's a mutated recessive gene, whose damage disables the creation of the CCR5 receptor in the surface of cells; its absence prevents the virus from entering into the cell and taking it over. A great example of a "damaging" mutation with beneficial effects. Good to remember.
StrikaAmaru 11 months ago
I love Richard Dawkins
24Matferrari 1 year ago
Richard Dawkins is a genious.
24Matferrari 1 year ago
dawkin has answers already prepared for his audience people just about ask the same questions all the time so he has something clever ready for them. he wasted his life spreading his false doctrine. something had to exist to start all this the universe did not exist at on point so what made the universe didn't need matter or space so is it so hard to believe what started it was a mind? I've seen angels so to me i don't have faith Gods real i know
MMAGUY13 1 year ago
@MMAGUY13 that's because someone payed him a lot of money for this purpose. The markets are interested the people not to believe in God. When the people have no other reason to live, except to "consuming", it's very easy to see that someone will become terribly rich :). Have no fear, my brother!!!
BeLieVeR11111 1 year ago
AT 4:00 quantum mechanics is certainly imposing. But an inner voice tells me that it is not yet the real thing. The thoery says a lot, but does not really bring us any closer to the secret of the old one. I at any rate am convinced He does not throw dice. Albert Enistein does that sound poetic. D.is a propaganda machine.
joywonder 1 year ago
This old fart doesn't have many years left to live, he beter enjoy the riches and the fame to the last hour and the last minute of his life.
crickerplague 1 year ago
atheist=gay
gay=human extinction
crickerplague 1 year ago
@crickerplague
I dont see what sexuality has to do with being an atheist. Being gay or straight has nothing in common with believeing in a god/gods. Plenty of gay believe in a form of god this is just you being an ignorant twat.
zeak987 1 year ago
@crickerplague
atheist=a demonym referring only to people who don't accept the existence of deities and nothing else.
homosexuals=a demonym referring to people with a sexual preference for members of their own sex and nothing else.
To conflate them is a logic fail, Priests go after little boys all the time and inmates who are statistically more likely to be religious, get raped all the time. Not to confuse association with causation, I recognize that it's not necessarily part of the theology-
4ThomasAllan 1 year ago
Comment removed
4ThomasAllan 1 year ago
-but it does highlight the empirical data that suggests that homosexuality and rape is more rampant among the religious despite the condemnation of it among most of their denominations and the largely indifferent reception to homosexuality if not rape, among the irreligious.
Atheist=gay rapist (low probability)
Religious=gay rapist (high probability)
Religious gay rapist=hypocritical menace to humanity.
Dear Christians, prepubescent youths are for educating and NOT molestation. :)
4ThomasAllan 1 year ago
-maybe that was a bit hamfisted, not all religious people are evil retards despite the dictates of their theologies. You know who you are and whether the above applies to you or not.
4ThomasAllan 1 year ago
@crickerplague Haha What the fuck? Are you retarded?
TheHalluzination 1 year ago
I like the way Dawkins talks. Professional, clean, polite, easy to understand.
ocarina2boy 1 year ago
I think Richard Dawkins has a stance about religion and he spends a great deal of time explaining his stance in a clever way.
I have a very simple approach to life. I do not listen to other people about religion. I have my own, Am I going to share it , i don`t think so apart from a few examples. Do I respect others religion, yes I do, do I want others religion no I don`t. My examples are let others have their religions and let them get on with it so long as they don`t impose on you.
I
306bad 1 year ago
@306bad
But religious people DO impose their religion on others; their children. That doesn't deserve respect imo.
1sokkie 1 year ago
@1sokkie atheism was forced on dawkins by his parents
joywonder 1 year ago
@joywonder Dude, do your research, atheism wasn't forced on him, religion was. Dumbass...
ottou22 1 year ago
@ottou22 well than he is just like hitler born religious, spews propoganda and will die an atheist.
joywonder 1 year ago
@ottou22 of course he was born into religion then why doesn t he stop his whining about people always being what their parents were please sense you know him so well ask him to please shut up over that, it is such a mis-direction I got called dumb ass by a superior atheist mind over it.
joywonder 1 year ago
@joywonder I think someone paying him for spreading this irregular theory. And by paying I mean a lot of money.
BeLieVeR11111 1 year ago
@BeLieVeR11111 you re probibly right
joywonder 11 months ago
god, i love him too!! lolol I bought his book. i commented on another video about making fun of religion: atheist ppl never try to impose their beliefs on other ppl like religious ppl do.... So my bf and i got into a huge argument in the subway station and i knew he just hated my book (he claims to be a christian) he snatched it out of my had and threw it into the train tracks! lmao! religion is so confusing and deceiving it harbors anger...!! lol
kajikaika21 1 year ago
god, i love him too!! lolol
kajikaika21 1 year ago
What about one of the oldest religions: Jain?
angusmcbagpipes 1 year ago
When he gets into the scale stuff, sometimes I think "Fuck, why do people care about an abstract scale like this?"
Other than that, I like his stuff, generally. I feel like sometimes dealing with religion is such a large part of his life that he kind of assumes that everyone cares about it as much as he does.
I care about it and am glad he's fighting, but on that scale I don't take a position, though its somewhere closer to 6 or 7. I don't know that there's no God, but I've seen no evidence.
hellomate639 1 year ago
0:54 why did they laugh at that o.O he said, thank you alright and they started laughing like crazy..
Wtf?
@talons2112 why do you think he id deluded?
JollSSteR 1 year ago
Comment removed
FCMillwall81 1 year ago
wow is this dawkins guy deluded
talons2112 1 year ago
valu777, I added up all the "begats" in the Bible, and came up with about 6,000 years old for the age of the Earth. Like Ussher back in the 17th century, when I got to about Isaac, things got foggy, so I had to make some assumptions...oh, shoot, sorry! My bad I forgot! You said I couldn't use "assumptive data". Come to think of it, I assumed right from the start that the Bible was literal fact without any evidence to support my assumption, didn't I? Oops! You're right, valu, this is hard!
godforbacon 1 year ago
I have a sagan quote for y'all.
"Our desire to be connected to the cosmos reflects a profound reality. We are connected not in the trivial ways astrology promises but in the deepest ways."
He meant we arent just living in the universe, we are the universe. Our molecules are star guts, our bodies animated using harvested energy of the sun. That reality is more powerful then any religion.
rustyscrapper 1 year ago
Humans are nothing but a bunch of tadpoles at the bottom of a well, going through metamorphosis to become frogs so that one day they would look up and said to themselves, "the sky is not that big."
cricker13666 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"God" is an idea created to control the thoughts and behaviors of humans. That said, humans are silly creatures who need their thoughts and behaviors controlled.
Dickhead-Dawkins is a power-hungry putz.
parafleet 1 year ago
Watching him speak makes me feel better about my own speaking ability. If Dawkins can basically read his speeches word-for-word, so can I! =-)
I don't have that lovely accent though.
shantih433 1 year ago
Ah, yes, homochirality. That's the new little gap of scientific knowledge God occupies now, 5tony? He busies himself making little protein and amino acid molecules and such left-handed or right-handed? "I'll show the non-believers! I'll hide the evidence of my existence and intervention in a molecular orientation bias! HA HA! I am a great and important god! Fear me or I will flip your enzymes like an omelet for all eternity!"
godforbacon 1 year ago
@godforbacon atheists GOSPEL OF GUESSWORK There is no formula for the age of the earth or evolution that is free from Guesswork ,assumptive data input (if we are wrong post the method / formula?????)
this confirms science in these fields =GUESSWORK only
Atheist / science use the gospel of guesswork
here is a challenge!
Give the age of the earth or evolution
without utilising assumptive data to calculate it?
ASSUMPTIONS WILL TAKE YOU TO THE LAKE OF FIRE are you sure?
valu777 1 year ago
WHEELER AUDITORIUM! YEA BABY!
omg, why couldn't i have graduated high school a year earlier? not fair!
BlindMansEye 1 year ago
Richard Dawkins - Darwin of the 21st Century
His Book "The God Delusion" is amazing, I read the whole thing and it really changed my thinking. For those who haven't read it, Go ahead and Download the e-book, It's a must read full of Humor and Hardcore facts about why Dawkins thinks God cannot exist !
forgottenmemories63 1 year ago
Dawkins should add the awesome words of Richard Feynman who said,"God was invented to explain mystery. God is always invented to explain those things that you do not understand. Now, when you finally discover how something works, you get some laws which you're taking away from God; you don't need him anymore. But you need him for the other mysteries. So therefore you leave him to create the universe because we haven't figured that out yet"
muzammilali007 1 year ago
Richard, please dont dis faeries, lol
MamaMario13 1 year ago
Thank God I'm an atheist
Jshect 1 year ago 34
@Jshect godness ;)
BeLieVeR11111 1 year ago
@Jshect
Psst, not with a capital letter!
Wofaze 11 months ago
As much as I hate those dislike button comments I have to make one here... 34 credulous fools clinging to their unscientific creationism, afraid of a rational thinker!!
Jshect 1 year ago
ive never before been captivated by a long monologue before, but i held onto his every word in this
jhibbitt1 1 year ago
Most creationists are half-minded morons - otherwise they wouldn't be slaves to bronze myths and fairy tales for children.
masala505 1 year ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Wow! any half minded creationist would wipe the floor with guy!
Its not that difficult when we have the truth on our side.
That is why he wont debate,and resorts to insults, he gets applause though, I will give him that.
brandisify 1 year ago
@brandisify He has had debates with Creationist and ran through them like a fat person at a buffet.
CaptYamato1 1 year ago 10
@brandisify
The same half-minded creationist that believes humans coincided with dinosaurs, and that the world is under 10 000 years old... He would have to be half-minded! :)
ElDuorPaso 1 year ago
I am the Queen of the Vikings, you will worship Wotan and Thor OR ELSE!
JeanySullivan 1 year ago 2
@JeanySullivan
Freya? Is that you? It's me, Isis ... Wanna head out for a latte after Apollo puts his chariot away?
(ROFLMAO)
CanadianBroad2008 1 year ago
@JeanySullivan Freya? Is that you? It's me, Isis ... Wanna head out for a latte after Apollo puts his chariot away?
(ROFLMAO)
CanadianBroad2008 1 year ago
@CanadianBroad2008 ohhh my holy godesss!! It is you, dear Isis! Let's go and put the wings on those horses, mate! :-D
JeanySullivan 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Free inexhaustible energy is real!But there are very powerfull forces that want to supress the technology,Get the blueprints for a free energy motor at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM ,Be part of the revolution!
offertorycardiacml 1 year ago
I could listen to him talk forever. Videos like this are great for insomniacs like me. lol
Amnesiac2389 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I know there IS a God.
msmastoo 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
God does exist !!!
1. Living God-bread of life like Jesus promised in Bible
YOUTUBE. COM / WATCH? V = S1TCWKCUWWY
2. Manopello veil of Veronica and Jesus face exact like on shroud of Turin(no comparing to some fictional models)
3.Eucharistic Miracle Lanciano, Italy 8th Century A.D. till now alive, real blood AB!
4. Uncorrupted bodies of catholics saints
5.Calanda, Spain in 1640, a young farmer’s leg was restored to him after having been amputated two and a half years earlier
JezusSlave 1 year ago
I very much admire Dawkins for being one of the few scientists willing to take the bull by the horns and make a public stand on behalf of reason and intellectual integrity. But I thinks he hurts himself by having too broad a focus and not burrowing down immediately to the real problem. It isn't about whether the universe would "look different with a god." It's about dogmatism, anti-intellectualism, and indoctrination versus reason, skepticism, and critical thinking.
maplebayou1 1 year ago
@maplebayou1 ur a faggot u religious shit im the best atheist
5iveRP 1 year ago
@maplebayou1 I wish more people could recognize this.
eskayp101 1 year ago
It quickly becomes painfully obvious that most people could not care less about the origins of the universe. Their only religious impulse is for a faith that provides comfort, belonging, and the illusion of some degree of control over their lives. Find me one well-populated church that worships God the Supremely Indifferent.
maplebayou1 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ONLY THE CATHOLIC CHURCH IS THE TRUE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST, APOSTOLIC CHURCH PROVIDES ALL SACRAMENTS AND THE MOST IMPORTANT ONE - OF THE LIVING GOD - THE BREAD OF LIFE IN THE EUCHARIST!
WITH 2,000 YEARS OF TRADITION AND SACRIFICES OF CHRISTIANS TODAY WE KNOW WHAT THE BIBLE AND SALVATION THROUGH JESUS CHRIST IS.
MANY PROPHECIES AND VISIONARIES.
THE REAL MIRACLES, EFFECTIVE EXORCISMS, INCCORUPT BODIES OF SAINTS,
YOUTUBE. COM / WATCH? V = S1TCWKCUWWY
JOHN 6: 32-66
JezusSlave 1 year ago
HOW MANY MILLION OF PEOPLE KILLED ATHEISM IN 20 CENTURY ONLY?
JezusSlave 1 year ago
@JezusSlave
0
senseimilla 1 year ago
@JezusSlave
opptynox 1 year ago
@JezusSlave O.K.
hpholland 1 year ago
@JezusSlave lol i hope your name is ironic
PooeyBum11 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
THIS IS PROOF THAT ONLY CATHOLIC CHURCH IS TRUE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST AND HIS HOLY SACRAMENTS!!!
youtube. com/ watch?v =jqsRDD6kXWY
While they were eating, Jesus took bread, gave thanks and broke it, and gave it to his disciples, saying, "Take and eat; this is my body." Then he took the cup, gave thanks and offered it to them, saying, "Drink from it, all of you. This is my blood of the covenant, which is poured out for many for the forgiveness of sins." Matthew 26:26-28
God bless You
JezusSlave 1 year ago
joey wheeler xD
selearemus 1 year ago
@selearemus brooklyn raaaage
Rael0505 1 year ago
dawkins saves the world
beccaminstrell 1 year ago 9
This has been flagged as spam show
DISCOVERED in the 21stC: The Underlying Law of Nature.
The top 3 General Characteristics of The underlying law of nature are:
#1. The Way of All Things
#2. The Basis of All Laws and Principles
#3. The Basis of All Health, Growth, Efficacy and Efficiency
Google it – as a start.
The underlying law of nature may be the world's most useful, profitable and encouraging knowledge.
The empirical process for identifying the underlying law of nature was discovered in 2008. Soon we may all do so.
TedDGPoulos 1 year ago
Thor Worshipers Unite! Thor exists because he struck touchdown Jesus.
t3rr411 1 year ago
9:00 Concerning faeries i am also near "6". But towards belief in God i am at exactly "7". Something that is ill defined can not exist. Every believer makes up something else, all inconsistent, contradicting beliefs that are as vague as possible only to not be disprovable. if its infalsifiable it cant exist.
Definitely 7.
omnissient 1 year ago
I'm happy to see that religious people don't dominate these videos and channels. On the other hand it seems that not many religious people even care to look at events like this, too bad... for them.
Drakon222 1 year ago
@Drakon222 if they did, their minds wouldnt be changed. And those that fear they would have their minds changed would either lash out or stop listening. In another lecture presented by Richard Dawkins to a more mixed assembly of many religous students/teachers. When Dawkins was talking early on quite a few students (religous students) got up from their seats and left the lecture theatre, not being able to accept the truth laid out before them.
Squival138 1 year ago
@Drakon222
That's because Dawkings just focuses on wether or not religion is true.. which isn't really that interesting if you're a somewhat secularized christian..
herrkarlson 1 year ago
God, I love this man!
bleuscorpio 1 year ago
Does anybody know what year this was?
BlueSpirals 1 year ago
@BlueSpirals Its definately not in the bottom corner of the video in the beginning, if thats what youre asking.
HayleeHalogenX 1 year ago
@HayleeHalogenX curse you, I HATE paying attention to details
BlueSpirals 1 year ago
God , Allah, Deus, jeovah is the same
Fluke30486 1 year ago
VISHINU SMITE THEE!!!
KeroroGunsouTX 1 year ago
Put this on my ipod, great listening while driving.
cutes22 1 year ago 3
Put this on my ipod, great listening while driving.
cutes22 1 year ago