india hAD COUNTLESS COLLECTIONS OF DIAMONDS, PLATINUMS,GOLD, PEARL AND PRECIOUS STONES, WHICH WILL NEVER DIE, IN THE FORM OF JEWELLERIES AND ORNAMENTS AND OTHER DEOCRATIVE ITEMS ETC, OWNED BY ALL THE RULERS AND THEIR FAMILIES, WHERE ARE THEY ALL GONE, IF THEY WERE IN INDIA FOR THE PEOPLE, A 0.1% OF ITS MORE THAN ENOUGH FOR MAKING INDIA ECONOMYWISE NO.1, I KNOW SOME OF IT HAS STOLEN BY FOREIGNERS DURING THE WAR AND TAKEN TO THEIR COUNTRIES, BUT, STILL IT IS WEIRD THAT WHERE ARE THESE COLLECTIONS
badshahnama page 204 explains it all.. its a hindu temple of bhagwan shiv. Muslims have history of capturing hindu temples and converting them to mosques. See quran sura 18 verse 21..
Construct over them a structure. Their Lord is most knowing about them." Said those who prevailed in the matter, "We will surely take [for ourselves] over them a masjid." the mughals looted and destroyed our history and culture... shahjahan stole the kohinoor from taj and then then british stole it
@ak4daside No sir I believe you are the retard, instead of trolling around how about you do some actual research instead of relying on Wikipedia, alrright? It was mentioned that the mughals were from Afghanistan but some people did not know that, some few mongols mixed with Afghans like babur whos father (humyayun was full Afghan) dunno e BITCH.
@Warbearer567 Yeah right Cloud with False info tell me One book which is compulsory in the Schools in Mongolia to Study ? Tell me , just answer that Question and also Tell me one history Book that is written by a Brahmin but praised Aurangzeb, We shall see who has what level of knowledge between the Two of us once u reply this comment
@codyjust4u The evil deeds of Aurangzab in the September issue of Panchjabya in 1991 translated " He has written that the Mughal of Chugtai dynasty, Aurangzeb, is highly wicked. Being drunk he has occupied the throne of Delhi. He does not recognise the power of God in relation to the non-Muslims. This cruel person has willed to do evil deeds. He wants to dye the entire India in the colour of his religion and Islamise it.This proud and arrogant person has ordered demolition of all temples...
@codyjust4u Hahaha, After making my comments below which I consider you reading, I decided to visit a youtube video on Auranzeb by Aryantameem. I looked at the comments, Most them tell the truth of Aurangzeb. Rajputs, Viajynagar', Marathas, Sikhs offered a steep resistance & saved REAL INDIAN CULTURE. Consider who Aurangzeb is before praising him of his evil deeds. He gave a bad name for Islam, so I think its good time to forget about this monster.
Akbar had committed many atrocities. History tells us that he had burnt down thousands of villages killing innocent people.Not just that,Akbar had ordered to
cut down thousands of trees.The locals in order to save the trees use to tie themselves around trees, which included children and women. Emperor Akbar
ordered to cut down the trees along with the people.
Akbar was Immoral in Character and Nature. Akbar possessed a inordinate lust for women, just like his ancestors and predecessors. One of Akbar’s motives
during his wars of aggression was to appropriate their women, daughters and sisters. The Rajput women of Chittor prefered “Jauhar” (immolation) than to be
captured and disrespectfully treated as servants and prostitutes in Akbar’s harem.Abul Fazal in Ain-e-Akbari provides accounts of some such acts which are
Maharana Pratap considered to exemplify the qualities to which Rajputs aspire.Maharana Pratap never accepted Akbar as ruler of India, and fought Akbar all his life. Akbar first tried diplomacy to win over Maharana Pratap but nothing worked.Maharana could have become friends with Akbar, but in the siege of
Chittor Akbar had killed 27,000 civilians. This left a lasting impression on Maharana's mind and he decided he could not bow to such injustice and cruelty.
@Warbearer567 u hating Mughals is your choice boy but its your Ancestral choice Oh History of sikhs gmmm , lets see rebelling against the Government is rebellion, failed rebellion is TERRORISM OMG u guys began as TERRORIST oh and do u know y the Mughal Sikh WAR began? ur GURUS were SHELTERING people WHO WERE ABUSING the ISLAMIC PROPHET, so WHAT ELSE DO U EXPECT? oh and BTW, U Guys NEVER Considered yourself as INDIAN as U were totally PRO BRITISH IMPEREALISM remember READ HISTORY NOT PROPOGANDA
@codyjust4u : There were many oppressed Muslims who were devoted to the Sikh Gurus. A majority of the Sikhs have Hindu ancestry but some Muslims converted to Sikhism as well. Mughals are hybrid race - descendants of the Turkish slaves and Genghis Khan - the tyrant who destroyed the far more civilized Persian Islamic kingdom and unleashed great terror on them.
@ganeshanI1 U haven't read the mughal geneology carefully, they were not slaves in recorded history and neither was gengis khan a slave in recorded history and gengis khan never reached persia in his lifetime,
@codyjust4u : wiki : Genghis_Khan.. Although the famous Mughal Emperors were descendants of Genghis Khan and Tamerlane, they distanced themselves from the Mongol atrocities against the Khwarizim Shahs, Turks, Persians, the citizens of Baghdad and Damascus and historical figures such as Attar of Nishapur. Among the Iranian peoples, he is regarded along with Tamerlane as one of the most despised conquerors of Iran.
@ganeshanI1 In much of Russia, Middle East, Korea, China, Ukraine, Poland and Hungary, Genghis Khan and his regime are credited with considerable damage, destruction and loss of population.
@ganeshanI1 OBSERVE Gengis Khan is a Non-Muslim and Mughals are MUSLIMS and thank you for citing some info which actually supports me but GENGIS KHAN NEVER INVADED IRAN IT WAS HULAGU on Reaching the borders of the persian empire Gengis khan died, later the Mongol Karaltai voted his second son Ogedi or Mongke but its Ogedi or Toulai as the Khagan and he proceeded to penetrate in west asia
@codyjust4u ; I stand corrected on Genghiz's religion. I thought at some point of time he adopted Islam. But anyways, the Mughals did continue many malpractices of the Mongols, e.g. Akbar carried on Genghiz's policy of choosing any married woman for her Harem, the husband was forced to divorce her. Is that an Islamic practice? If yes, it is a shame. The Mughals were highly indulgent, brutal and immoral compared to what the land had seen before them. Did Hulagu carry on Genghiz's agenda?
@codyjust4u (Continued) of deities without any delay. He wanted to finish ancient customs and religious and pious policies. He would not allow worship of deities, ancestors, God, prayers and association with saints and sages. Propagation of Puranic tales, importance of pilgrimages and worship of deities have all been finished.Through allurement and atrocities he has converted many Hindus to Islam. Many Hindus have been polluted after their sacred thread and vermillion were removed.
@codyjust4u (continued) That was the Kashmiri Pandits approach Guru Tegh Bahadur for aid, Shri Guru Teg Bahadur became engrossed in deep thought after listening to the story of the Pandits.Aurangzeb felt losing ground under his feet on seeing the courage and strong religious faith of Guru Teg Bahadur. Aurangzeb flared up and gave two options to the Guru - either death or adoption of Islam. To make a long story short, Aurangzeb felt no remorse to "other peoples", his atrocities were damaging.
@codyjust4u (Final) Guru Gobind Singh Ji and Guru Teg Bahadur Ji are the ones that showed Aurangzab the rightious paths that he can follow, in the letter of Zafarnama which is written in an exquisite Persion verse. The letter, Guru Ji reminds Aurangzeb how he and his henchmen had broken their oaths taken on the holy Koran. Zafarnama is included in Hikayats and it's the first Hikayat. Despite this deception, this treacherous leader could not harm the Guru.... And so forth
@codyjust4u You are delusional, how the fuck did Sikhs originated as terrorists. You Mughals raping/pillaging are the fucking terrorists. You people kill in the name of the Prophet, fake Muslims. Akbar, Wazir Khan and Aurangzab are just disgusting in their actions, you just don't know that and are even happy about your tyrant leaders. Damn demons, research those people if you disagree.
@Warbearer567 u people live in a world of lies regarding the Mughals and those lies are propounded by those of ur government people who are anti-mughal or anti-Islam in nature (may be), Aurangzeb was an emperor who had mercy in heart but ruled with an iron fist simply because he was constantly under threat like india in J&K today and i am not dumb like u i have researched a lot unlike u who just read books which they have no choice to or read biased material, some freedom of expression u got
@Warbearer567 and U say Muslims kill in the name of Prophet is totally misleading, biased and racist and that shows u are already a RACIST and a BIASED DEMON, it like saying HINDUS KILL MUSLIMS & CHRISTIANS IN THE NAME OF POLITICAL POWER AND MANDIR WHICH IS TRUE TO SOME EXTENT and HONESTLY U ARE MAKING THIS A RELIGIOUS ISSUE which u should know is not what we are talking about here, AURANGZEB spent 2 years in a FOREST feeding the POOR by himself and TAKING WATER TO PEOPLE (MUSLIM OR NON-MUSLIM)
@Warbearer567 as for ur question how SIKHS originated as TERRORIST u have to READ the DEFINITION, A PERSON WHO SEEKS TO OVER THROW A GOVERNMENT OF WHICH HE IS A CITIZEN IS A REBEL/TERRORIST and SIKHS WERE CITIZENS OF THE MUGHAL EMPIRE just in case u didn't know and THEY(non-Muslims) WERE ALLOWED TO HAVE THEIR OWN SET OF GOVERNMENT ADMINISTRATIVE BODIES EXCEPT FOR THE WAR DEPARTMENT and REVENUE DEPARTMENT and u used the terms such as FUCK AND FUCKING, some Manners u have WHATEVER
i don't know if u are muslim or hindu or indian but u seriously need to stop blabbering ur wishful thinking,
oh FYI , THE FIRST AND LAST HERO OF 1857 WAR/REVOLT WAS BAKHT KHAN WHO WAS A MUSLIM SUBJECT OF MUGHAL EMPIRE BUT AN ETHNIC AFGHAN PASHTU AND NEVER SURRENDERED AND YES ALSO THE LEADING GENERAL UNDER WHOSE COMMAND MARATHAS WERE TO ACT BUT THEY DIDN'T AS HE WAS A MUGHAL MUSLIM
@codyjust4u Just a note, do really like Mughals that much and their tyrant leaders? They have caused unparalleled chaos and torture, the massacred many innocent people. No offence but I detest them so much, the only soldiers of justice that I know who went against there brutal regime are the Sikhs, I respect my Sikhs Gurus for what bravery they have done against this evil tide, Don't forget Battle of Chamkaur! where so few defeated so many.
@Warbearer567 tyrant leaders? the Mughals? they caused unparalleled Chaos? DO U EVEN KNOW THAT THE MUGHALS MADE INDIA A SUPER POWER AND 'INTERNATIONAL SUPER POWER' and there was NO CHAOS BECAUSE OF THEM, The SIKHS AND MARATHAS Caused CHAOS by rebelling for POWER, U detesting them is your choice and seriously make some Study Sikhs always wanted an Independent State while marathas wanted a Hindu only State none while MUGHALS wanted a ONE UNITED SOUTH ASIAN EMPIRE now India, Pakistan and Bangladesh
@codyjust4u As I have said they massacred poor innocent people, some historians have done grave injustice to outstanding historical figures by refusing to accord them in their rightful place in history. Take a look at what Wazir Khan and Aurangzeb, what atrocities they have done, you must understand the chaos these tyrant leader have caused. The Sikhs wanted Muslims and Hindu's to unite each other to work together in friendship, Sikhism was created to neutralise the chaos.
@Warbearer567 The sikhs wanting hindu and Islam get mixed meant Destruction of Islam & Aurangzeb and Wazir Khan were Hard line Muslims as well as well known tolerant Rulers of their time, there is not a single report of religious unrest in their time, these people banned things such and intoxicants , interest, prostitution(devdasi) , Sikhs were peaceful in the start but when they challenged the Government & wanted a kingdom problems erupted plus they sheltered people abusing the Islamic Prophet
@codyjust4u: Aurangzeb was to Hindus and Sikhs what Hitler was to Jews. Hitler might have had some issues with the Jews personally. But, Aurangzeb though two of his fore-mothers were Hindus had nothing but hatred for people who did not follow him. He is the father of modern day Taliban.. He was a great demon who blinded and killed his noble elder brother, imprisoned his own father until his death, didn't allow his sister to be married, killed her suitor(s) and committed countless atrocities.
@ThePseudoBasher YOU CAN'T BLOW HOT AND COLD THE SAME TIME, MAKE UP UR MIND FIRST U SAY MUGHALS WERE BEATERN IN WAR BY THE BRITISH THEN U SAY MARATHA THEN U SAY INDIANS REVOLTED BRITISH AND MARATHAS HAS AN ALLIANCE WHICH LASTED ABOUT 15 YEARS.
ALAXANDER CAM TO THE DOORS OF DELHI which u commoners know not
@ThePseudoBasher Alexander, Arabs, Huns, Sassanids, Mongols never came to India!!! :-O
Huns are North Asian & North Europeans so no chance of them coming to south Asia by Land,Arabs ruled india fromthe time of Muhammed Bin Kasim(r) a Great Hero of Muslim, and FYI MUGHALS WERE MONGOLS from the loins of Gengis Khan, U should also read about Ghorids and Gaznavids who were Afghans and the FIRST power to Beat the HELL OUT OF INDIA and PAKISTAN IN THE MUSLIM WORLD.
@ThePseudoBasher FYI again MIR JAFAR was not a MUGHAL SUBJECT but a SUBJECT of NAWAB OF BENGAL who was INDEPENDENT and BAHADURSHAH ZAFAR had his domain from Delhi to Agra to Lucknow.
Now I am Not a Pakistani but Pakistan is a New Nation and so its History begins from 14 Ag 1947 people like u think reading small books ins enough, make some scholarly effort if u are really sincerer
@ThePseudoBasher (i mean King not kind) after the capture Bijapur and Ahmednagar Shahji father of Shivaji was granted Lands(Jagir) which was used by Shivaji as a recruitment center (terrorist training camp in modern day definition) Mughals did fall but only to the British as when Marathas tried to Dethrone the Mughals they were challenged from all sides as No one was ready to accept MARATHAS as EMPERORS in India
@ThePseudoBasher Mughals were born Royals they had princely blood in them and always had titles while Maratha were Street and Mountainous people, they were originally granted land by Delhi Sultanate and NEVER HAD A KIND B4 SHIVAJI, Babur was the Grand Prince of Samarkhans who lost it and retreated to Afghanistan to his allies(Baburnama/memoirs of Babur) there after invaded India once his friend baburi returned from Turkey with Cannons invented by Muslims of Turkey
@ThePseudoBasher : U are in serious need of studying History, read books by Abraham Erly , Mannuchi etc. Indian historians all of them agree that the British advent began in the time of Jehangir, not Shah Jahan while others say the Portuguese people already came to India before Jehangir, Cambridge book of Indian History will be very useful to u [Cambridge history of india]
@ThePseudoBasher as i told u study deeper, 1857 was declared by indian military while Mughals were inducted as Leaders of the Revolt everywhere, And according to recorded Chronology Marathas joined in late despite of the declaration of war
@ThePseudoBasher Find me a Single person who is not a MARATHA in his government, the mughals reigned 300+years becoz they employed people from everywhere, the Rajputs didn't support the Marathas because of Racism against them.Maratha government was a Islamic system government their agenda that Muslims are foreigners is a core agenda which includes Mughals on a larger scale
@ThePseudoBasher : Shivaji was referred as chatrapati or whatever which was a non-recognized title for about 18 years and so called equivalent of Padshah, and i have studies indian history FYI in much more detail than u,Sambhaji betrayed Shivaji and joined he Siddhi, Shivaji was not a secular monarch like mughals as his agenda was a HINDU KINGDOM which a person of history knows and his government only MARATHA government (which is racism today)
Alexander, Arabs, Huns, Sassanids, Mongols never came to India coz we didn't let them, even when Mughals and Delhi sultanate rulers came to India we fought back and created our own Empires UNLIKE Pakis....Mughals started declining during and post Aurangzeb era coz we Indians revolted and created own empires like Marathas and Mysore...Marathas and Mysore rulers took most of the Indian and back from Turkic Mughals...unlike you
You pakis need to study HISTORY....u are those ducks who have been easily conqored by foreigners everytime, Greeks, Mauryans, Sassanids, Guptas, Palas, Mongols, Turks, Mughals, Arabs and finally Britishers...just read ur history, you guys have never ruled urself or have started an empire, We Indians have been under foreign rule too, but for much much less time and we always kept on fighting unlike u, who bent over for every foreigner
And it was not those fag Turkic bastard mughals who declared 1857, it was Martahs like Peshwa Baji Rao, Nana Sahib and Gwalior Kings who started the revolt after Mangal Pandey and his soldiers went on strike/revolt against the bullets...Bahadur shah zafar was a dead duck with no territory to rule, he was a acting king backed by Britishers...it was Mughals and their appointed Turkic Nawabs like Mir jafar who started it all
The Maratha Military was never well trained, if we were to apply today's definition then they would be Militants or terrorists, Marathas based their religious policies on Mughal policies which is why Shivaji in Britain is sometimes 'emperor of islamic india' and FYI, there is NO HISTORIC GOVERNMENT RECORD FROM ARCHIVES THAT REFERS SHIVAJI OR OTHER MARATHA 'KINGS' AS HIS MAJESTY EMPEROR OF SO and SO, The Maratha MILITARY was based on nothing as they were HIT AND RUN MERCENARIES
@codyjust4u Shivaji(an Indian btw) was the patriarch of Maratha Empire, who started an Indian empire against foreigner Mughals, his son Sambhaji expanded and took most of their territory...and unlike Mughals he was secular and dind't treat the converted Muslims badly....SHIVAJI WAS REFERRED AS "CHATRAPATI"...have u even read history or u have just watch Pakistan TV??
Mughals made South Asia their Home, brought peace, prosperity while Delhi Sultanate was not brutal it was just losing its efficiency in holding power due to unruly governors, When Europeans first attempted to capture India in the time of jehangir about 7 of 15 ships were sunk by Mughal Rockets, that alarmed the europeans to stay away from South Asia, Marathas were some what street people whom we say street rats they were so inefficient that they continued with Mughal System of Administration
@codyjust4u Mughals brought peace??, prosperity??...and now even delhi sultanate was not brutal??...Europeans made their way in Shah jahan's time....Maraths were not street people, thats like saying that Mughals were street people of Uzbekistan.......Marathas started expanding during and after Aurangzeb's reign....and created a 2 million sq. km large empire(one of the largest in Sub continent ever)...Mughals fell ike a pack of cards after Maratha rose
here is ur History lesson, Amir Timur was a descendant of Gengis khan through his son Jochi's 10th concubine, Babur was a son of Emir Omar Shaikh Mirza of Farghana,who was descended by Jochi's 4th wife, Babur made India Humayun's Home which is why he is Buried in India as per the will of Babur and babur was burried in Kabul by Sher Shah Sur(read more its too lengthy) Akber was an illiterate man which is why he couldn't fight much wars making peace by marring about 60 wives(disputed)
@ThePseudoBasher as for ur comment about mughals licking british feet, u should know that the maratha generals deserted the Army in 3rd battle of panipat and desertion is a COWARDS act while only about 200 of mughal soldiers returned alive,[thank u marathas for making india a british slave] Mughals made India an international power as they had International Standards while Marathas knew nothing about controlling a country
@ThePseudoBasher seriously indians need to study history in its reality and not read political propaganda,first: it was the marathas who were first to make peace with british,when tipu sultan declared war marathas were bought of by the british,mughals were treating india and indians as their own while british were treating india as property,it was mughals who declared 1857 war and marathas joined in after 8 months during that time they were busy making peace with the british which failed
@Pakistan899m I am full Indian, i dont need to prove my Indianess to a man who supports foreign barbarians....I support marathas, rajputs who fought these assholes and threw them out later....ur a mullah i guess for whom every muslim has to be a good guys, irresepective of the fact that he invaded ur country and looted it
@ThePseudoBasher The mughals conquered India and took it away from the really cruel turkish delhi sultanate and they rebuilt delhi which had been destroyed by one of their ancestors. Everyone wants power it is just a natural part of being a human being but the point I am trying to make is that a ruler should be openminded and be tolerant of all religions and that is how Akbar was. I think you should read more about the mughals specifically instead of just the Hindu indian side.
@ThePseudoBasher The mughals conquered India and took it away from the really cruel turkish delhi sultanate and they rebuilt delhi which had been destroyed by one of their ancestors(timur). Everyone wants power it is just a natural part of being a human being but the point I am trying to make is that a ruler should be openminded and be tolerant of all religions and that is how Akbar was. I think you should read more about the mughals specifically instead of just the Hindu indian side.
From pakistan899 to ThePseudoBasher You just hate muslims as a whole there is no real reason behind it you r just a crazy person who is confused. And muslim is not a race of any kind. There are white muslims, black muslims, brown muslims, and asian muslims. No I do not suck on anything you do with your confused mind. like hitler who was part jewish but had all the jews killed. you have indian blood but you still support british barbaric and unjustified rule for simply white domination.
are u crazy? Rajpits hated Mughals....its a legend here how much Rajputs hated Mughals, how Maharana Pratap the bravest and best Rajput King ever died fighting these turk bastards...Mughals are considered plunderers by Indians, u are a muslim, u people never support ur country but only muslims, thats why Qasim, mughals, Ghauris and Ghaznis are ur heros who looted and invaded India
to ThePseudoBasher from Pakistan899: The early Mughals were allies of the Hindu kings( including Rajputs) and the Rajputs only hated Jahangir and other Mughal kings after them. They liked Akbar for his consideracy and open-mindedness. My dad was born in what is now Pakistan but his family comes from Hyderabad India which makes me Indian and Pakistani. You are something that thinks he is Indian but is actually a Britisher left behind for being so stupid.
@Pakistan899 and even mughals stole a lot from us, Rajputs hated Mughals, Maharana Pratap died fighting those bastards, you are a paki so anything muslim will be good for u
@ThePseudoBasher The British stole from India which is why India, Pakistan, and Bangladesh is in such problems right now. The British also enslaved our people and took them to places like South Africa and other places in the gulf of mexico. And when the muslims wanted a separate part of India they granted it but they left Kashmir disputed so that we would be fighting while they keep all the riches. If you want to shove anything shove a British dick in your mouth to keep it shut.
@Pakistan899 You like Mughals just coz they were MUSLIMS...lets be honest, it was we Indians like marathas who fought Britishers, i dont need to learn from an asshole Mughals licking prick like you who is good for my country and who is not.....After aurnagzeb we Indians took back most of our territory but Delhi was still inder these mughals and hence britishers came
@ThePseudoBasher You just hate the Mughals because they were Muslims. I am a Muslim but I respect hindus. I do not just like the Mughals just because of they were Muslims(the delhi sultanate was ruled by muslim kings but I don't like them because they are the reason of the fighting between the muslims and hindus). The mughals didn't find the britishers as a threat which is why they didn't fight them. By the way what side r u on British or Indian?
@Pakistan899 i wont argue u with u, as a muslim(that too a paki) you are programmed to love every muslim thing, You people celebrate Qasim's vicotry over YOUR King of Dahir, so u can imagine how ur minds work. Mughal were Foreigners who invaded our country and were thrown out by marathas from most parts. I am an INDIAN first, and for me Mughals and Britshers were same, Britishers were a lill better.
@ThePseudoBasher The British stole from India which is why India, Pakistan, and Bangladesh is in such problems right now. The British also enslaved our people and took them to places like South Africa and other places in the gulf of mexico. And when the muslims wanted a separate part of India they granted it but they left Kashmir disputed so that we would be fighting while they keep all the riches. If you want to shove anything shove a British dick in your mouth to keep it quiet
@ThePseudoBasher what kind of indian are you? I am sorry are you even indian because the british didn't build the Taj Mahal, they didn't protect India like they promised to do so. Instead they used pig meat to make weapons. They stole from India and took away money, gold and silver for their bitch ass queen
@Pakistan899 Britishers gave us One of the earliest railways networks in the world, telephone network and telgraph network, WTF do u wanna do with Taj mahal, stuff it in ur ass....India has many tourist locations which attract more tourists than taj mahal....even mughals looted our Gold and silver, mughlas were not Indians they were turks
@ThePseudoBasher The mughals werent turks they were descendants of the mongols and the later mughals(everyone after Akbar) were born and raised in India(which makes them Indians). The Taj Mahal is called "the most beautiful building in the world" and it is also one of the wonders of the world which is a main reason why India tourists. I am not defending the later mughals(Jahangir, Shah Jahan, or Aurengzeb) who I agree did steal from India I am defending people like Akbar(best ruler India).
@Pakistan899 lol....how were they INDIANS? they were Turks, if an Indians family lives in US, it will always be an INDIAN family not a US one(thats just on papers)....Taj mahal is not the most visited place in India, Rajasthan and Kerala is....Mughals and Britishers were same imperialists....Britishers were more sophisticated than Mughals and ruled most of the world not just one country.
@ThePseudoBasher the British ruled most of the world for their egoistic white domination idea. The Mughals weren't turks they were descendants of the Mongols( mughal means mongol in Persian). The later mughals married indian women(Akbar married the Rajput Jodhaa and had kids with her). So the mughals were Indians too and they respected and loved India. The British took the last mughal king to Britain and he wrote some poetry about his love for India and him wanting to die in India.
@Pakistan899 Jodha was just on of her queen, he had 36 queens, he was not Indian, read mughal record how much they hated Indians(including u pakis)......India was a territory for them...as i said u just like him coz he made u muslim,,,simple u guys will always like muslim how bad they might be.
@ThePseudoBasher like i said the delhi sultanate was muslim and i don't like them. Akbar had only 4 wives not an exaggerated 36. And Islam has been in India before even the mughals were in India. And pakistan wasn't even created yet so how could they even hate Pakistanis? They didn't hate indians they liked them. I don't hate just for the heck of it I have reasoning behind it. You just hate muslims straight out which makes you a crazy egoistic person
@Pakistan899 He had 36 queens, unlike you who have just watched Bollywood films i guess, i have read history in London, Mughals hated Indians and only treated them like Subjects, They hated pakis(as a part of India) Islam in India spreaded mainly in Mughal era, Mughal started declining during and after Aurangzeb era coz Indians hated them, Indians like Marathas fought back and threw them out from most of the territory.
@ThePseudoBasher Akbar had 4 wives(2 were hindus, 1 was muslim, and the other was christian). Get your facts straight before starting an argument. Mughals didn't hate indians they liked them which is why there are still muslims in India. I read books unlike you who suck britishes dicks while listening to stories that they make up. Maybe my ancestors became muslims under the mughal dynasty or maybe not there is no saying.
@Pakistan899 lolo....i dont suck anybody...I am an Indian...you are sucking up to these turk bastards coz they are muslims.......and btw, plz read History...he had 36 Queens....36!!....Indians hated them how the fuck do u know it paki....Marathas threw these bastards out....Marthas were Indians who we are proud of not these invaders who looted our country...Mughals are hated coz of their invasion, Rajputs, Jats, Marathas all hate these bastards
@ThePseudoBasher you need to READ HISTORY not me. I know my history you don't. You think you are Indian but you arent. The Mughals were descendents of the Mongols (Mughal means mongol in Persian). The Mughals spoke Persian so how were they turks? The early mughals were supported by the Rajputs but the later ones weren't. Akbar liked Indians which is why he had Hindu Indian advisors too (Birbal, and Todarmal). And I hate you, you god damn FIRANGI. GO SUCK A BRITISH DICK
@Pakistan899 lol........now u saying that Mughals were not even turks??????.....Maharana Pratap died fighting these barbarians to save India....rajputs hated Mughals....some of them also supported Brits to save their empires, that makes Brits Indian too i guess...keep on sucking foreign muslim dicks....thats the reality of all u muslims of subcontinent....ur a loser race and will always be, no independent history, nothing....keep on sucking up to these turkic bastards
@ThePseudoBasher Ive been saying that they werent turks what the hell r u talking about? The brits hated India which is why they were imperialists of it. Maharana wanted just to rule India and Akbar wanted the same thing but Akbar chose to first try to make peace with Maharana before attacking his city. The Mughals weren't barbarians but I do disagree with what happened at Chitor fort. The Rajputs only hated the later mughals they liked Akbar which is why he was called Akbar(great one) in arabic
@Pakistan899 OMG...typical paki......maharanas were Indians who wanted to defend their territoryhow can u compare maharanas with these foreign bastards who invaded our Country....go and read history u have been watching too many bollywood films i guess
@ThePseudoBasher Rajputs only fought the later mughals, not Akbar because they liked him. I study history books unlike you who just listen to whatever the brits tell you. I am not a mullah I am an average muslim who likes the history of India. I am supportive to whoever is a good person I am not a person who just likes others based on their religion, nationality or race. There were people who called themselves muslims but did bad things i dont support em people should be judged individually.
@Pakistan899 lolo....i dont suck to anybody...I am an Indian...you are sucking up to these turk bastards coz they are muslims.......and btw, plz read History...he had 36 Queens....36!!....Indians hated them how the fuck do u know it paki....Marathas threw these bastards out....Marthas were Indians who we are proud of not these invaders who looted our country...Mughals are hated coz of their invasion, Rajputs, Jats, Marathas all hate these bastards...we know our History
The Mughals defended India from foreigners while the Marathas allowed the British, being the first Indian power to make Peace with the British, SUCK ON THAT, there was no such thing called india that time, it was the MUGHAL EMPIRE
@codyjust4u lol....it was Marathas who fought Britishers, it was ppl like Nana Sahib and Gwalior Kings who fought Britishers....mughals were licking Britsh feet in their small empire coz marathas took lot of their territory...Mughals were not Indians they were Turk from Uzbekistan, who occupied India
@ThePseudoBasher There wasn't any golden age of british controlled India they were all bandits. They took everything away from India and stole all the riches. Akbar helped India and appointed Rajputs. What did the British do? Huh?
Mughals were Uzbeks......babur was a descendant of Chengiz Khan.......they were not Indians.......99% of Indian and pakistani muslims, who are just a result of conversion and who hate hate Indian aka Hindu culture should feel ashamed of themself abt how they hate their own past
We Indians got independence after 200 years, hence, unable to rule the country. Always bad governance. Every newpapers & channel show crime stories. Every day thousands of crimes take place. Who taught to do all these crimes? Mughals? How subordinates like us can rule the country properly? The power is in BEGGERS' hand since independence. Muslims haven't been given jobs in Govt. Sector in aspect to their ratio, hence India hasn't became the BEST in the world.
If you see his Grave you will come to know that how simple it is and is nearby below the grave of his childhood Teacher.That actually proves the Greatness of the Greatest Moghul Emperor AURANGZEB ALAMGIR.
It is not reasonable to hate other communities because their ancestors have done something wrong. Aurangzeb was most religious & honest ruler India ever had. He fought against his rival rulers not against a 'COMMUNITY'. There were very few people against him. His entire territory was so happy, lived with harmony. His commander-in-chief was a Hindu. There were many Hindus & Sikhs in his military. He demolished those temples where prostitution was running (very few in numbers).
We Indians are very stupid who accepted the history written by the British historians. We are still fighting! These fight/hate/anger was cultivated by the Britishers. They have manipulated Indian History like ancient pandits manipulated Hindu Scriptures (very big tragedy). We stupids accepted each n every word of British. Reproach on those British who did this. Now, it's time to work for construction & development not for hating, blaming, abusing or criticizing.
We Indians are 'British Historians' Book Warm'. Moghals came India with wealth; ruled India, people happy & prosperous, became Indian, died as Indian, almost all burried in India aftr making India Gold Bird.
Britishers ruled India, splitted communities, so many riots, they looted India, ran away from India after cultivating seeds of hatred, riots & disputes.
Indian ruling India, earning money illegally, depositting in Swiss bank, so currupts, screwing-in Mother land. Who is the best ruler?
Mughals taught Indians to wear 'CHAPPAL' too. We didn't even have etiquettes of wearing slippers. Common people had no sense of wearing it. Hindus were very impressed of their culture, and adopted. That's why Rajasthanis women put their 'PALLU' on their heads. Mughals didn't force to wear Burqa to Hindu women, but order to hide atleast their faces not be seen by strangers. Such etiquettes are imported by Muslims in India.
"aryan" tameem take your chink chong semite mongrel mutt ass back into the shithole you came from. if you cant decide. we'll do it for you. your upper body back to maternal semitic harem ancestry of arabia. and your lower body back to your paternal chink rapist ancestry of central asia.
@cavegirl1985 yes - and of course the language - Urdu...Mughal influence exisits wherever the empire was... afte partition a lot of mughal monuments were destroyed - especially mosques
because the british backed them in doing so. when the british came into india, they were stunned to see that their form of subjugated the people, along with their secret religions that the rulers followed, were very similar to what they already had in england.
@nolimithighs when a great empire was on it's knees, old and wayward infact at the point the sikhs came to power the Mughal dynasty had gone. But anyway there is n othing courageous about what you Sikhs did - if you had ahlf the courage, alent of the Mughals you would have held power for more than a mere blip in hisotry!!.... and dont forget you sided witht he europeans too.
@nolimithighs wiped out?yes they managed to win in Punjab after many years of fighting but the the Punjabis were wiped out by the Afghans then the British
@Moebab Unless you are a Mongol-Rajput hybrid you are no Mughal. Because all of emperors from Akbar the great and down were of birthed from rajput princess,excluding Aurangzeb. Look at Babur,who looks likes a Mongoloid and know look at the last emperor and his children and wife.Which looks nothing like Mongols.
@Moebab I am a Christian, but yes my ancestors are Hindus long time ago, and I am sure yours were too. And a lot of those rajput mothers were Hindus man. Yes they were great, but some were NOT great to Muslims,Hindus,Sikh alike. Must of these emperors were power hunger alcoholic, sex hunger, murders, etc then true Muslims. People like our last president abul kalam in my opinion are true Muslims, dont get me wrong there are those fake hindus,Christians,Sikhs,etc too every where.
u fucking ass hole......a piece of shit...a part of a mortary.....lunatic...mother fucker....bitch/basterd.....swine....leave ths earth n burn in d hell....fucker..
Thousands of innocent people killed by these fanatics during crusades.Inquisition-When 800 yr, Arab rule ended, all Muslim and Jews were expelled or forcibly converted converted to and later burned in stakes.20 million people shipped form Africe to the Americas as slave.Aparthield-Millions of people were subjected to institutional subjugation.From Hitler to Stalin to Musolini to Truman to Milosovich, the greatest murders in human history were all born to this faith.
wt d fucking hell do u no anY THNG OF islam..have u ever known it properly....there is no divine power LIKE ALLAH...u lard...u fucker....fucking...ur fucking 4m whn u wr of 9mnths....u chuuuuu.....converted people like us can only understand d power n grace of ISLAM....at least v respect all religions n dnt abuse other religions like u...ths is d biggest g8ness of us...RESPECT UR RELIGION N AS WEL AS OF OTHERS N DNT LET ANY1 COMPLAIN ABT IT 2U.....U FUCKER...
Done i accept Islam "Praise Allah" now must drop ur pants and bend over for me dear sister for incestial sex is allowed in Islam, I wanna grab you from the back with your naked ass in front of me and then i hit it from the back real hard "Allah u Akbar"
india hAD COUNTLESS COLLECTIONS OF DIAMONDS, PLATINUMS,GOLD, PEARL AND PRECIOUS STONES, WHICH WILL NEVER DIE, IN THE FORM OF JEWELLERIES AND ORNAMENTS AND OTHER DEOCRATIVE ITEMS ETC, OWNED BY ALL THE RULERS AND THEIR FAMILIES, WHERE ARE THEY ALL GONE, IF THEY WERE IN INDIA FOR THE PEOPLE, A 0.1% OF ITS MORE THAN ENOUGH FOR MAKING INDIA ECONOMYWISE NO.1, I KNOW SOME OF IT HAS STOLEN BY FOREIGNERS DURING THE WAR AND TAKEN TO THEIR COUNTRIES, BUT, STILL IT IS WEIRD THAT WHERE ARE THESE COLLECTIONS
aabela1 1 week ago
Akbars really awesome cuz he never calls you names! he never really calls you anything cuz hes just a corn!!
Tylemaker19 1 month ago
till they started converting every 1 by force
84WAKEUP 3 months ago
@ak4daside ok you mongol cunt.
TheAfghan72 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
badshahnama page 204 explains it all.. its a hindu temple of bhagwan shiv. Muslims have history of capturing hindu temples and converting them to mosques. See quran sura 18 verse 21..
Construct over them a structure. Their Lord is most knowing about them." Said those who prevailed in the matter, "We will surely take [for ourselves] over them a masjid." the mughals looted and destroyed our history and culture... shahjahan stole the kohinoor from taj and then then british stole it
rajababu1982 3 months ago
@ak4daside they were not afgans or something, they were turkizied mongols, ruling class were from barlas tribe... Timur, Ulugbek, Babur were barlas
Askar9992 3 months ago
@ak4daside Not indian u paki fucker stop trying to pose as a mughal you paki fuck!
TheAfghan72 3 months ago
@ak4daside No sir I believe you are the retard, instead of trolling around how about you do some actual research instead of relying on Wikipedia, alrright? It was mentioned that the mughals were from Afghanistan but some people did not know that, some few mongols mixed with Afghans like babur whos father (humyayun was full Afghan) dunno e BITCH.
TheAfghan72 3 months ago
@ak4daside They were afghans
TheAfghan72 3 months ago
People, ignore codyjust4u's lies. He will cloud your mind with false information.
Warbearer567 10 months ago
@Warbearer567 Yeah right Cloud with False info tell me One book which is compulsory in the Schools in Mongolia to Study ? Tell me , just answer that Question and also Tell me one history Book that is written by a Brahmin but praised Aurangzeb, We shall see who has what level of knowledge between the Two of us once u reply this comment
codyjust4u 9 months ago
@codyjust4u The evil deeds of Aurangzab in the September issue of Panchjabya in 1991 translated " He has written that the Mughal of Chugtai dynasty, Aurangzeb, is highly wicked. Being drunk he has occupied the throne of Delhi. He does not recognise the power of God in relation to the non-Muslims. This cruel person has willed to do evil deeds. He wants to dye the entire India in the colour of his religion and Islamise it.This proud and arrogant person has ordered demolition of all temples...
Warbearer567 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@codyjust4u Hahaha, After making my comments below which I consider you reading, I decided to visit a youtube video on Auranzeb by Aryantameem. I looked at the comments, Most them tell the truth of Aurangzeb. Rajputs, Viajynagar', Marathas, Sikhs offered a steep resistance & saved REAL INDIAN CULTURE. Consider who Aurangzeb is before praising him of his evil deeds. He gave a bad name for Islam, so I think its good time to forget about this monster.
Warbearer567 9 months ago
Everyone, why are you all getting so worked up for? History and facts are 1 thing, but racism is just wrong! Can't we all just get along?
Abominatrix650 10 months ago
Akbar had committed many atrocities. History tells us that he had burnt down thousands of villages killing innocent people.Not just that,Akbar had ordered to
cut down thousands of trees.The locals in order to save the trees use to tie themselves around trees, which included children and women. Emperor Akbar
ordered to cut down the trees along with the people.
taaaydman 10 months ago
Akbar was Immoral in Character and Nature. Akbar possessed a inordinate lust for women, just like his ancestors and predecessors. One of Akbar’s motives
during his wars of aggression was to appropriate their women, daughters and sisters. The Rajput women of Chittor prefered “Jauhar” (immolation) than to be
captured and disrespectfully treated as servants and prostitutes in Akbar’s harem.Abul Fazal in Ain-e-Akbari provides accounts of some such acts which are
too disgusting to even mention.
taaaydman 10 months ago
@taaaydman : Absolutely correct, he did improve as a person later but still will no go down in history as someone India can be proud of.
ganeshanI1 10 months ago
Maharana Pratap considered to exemplify the qualities to which Rajputs aspire.Maharana Pratap never accepted Akbar as ruler of India, and fought Akbar all his life. Akbar first tried diplomacy to win over Maharana Pratap but nothing worked.Maharana could have become friends with Akbar, but in the siege of
Chittor Akbar had killed 27,000 civilians. This left a lasting impression on Maharana's mind and he decided he could not bow to such injustice and cruelty.
taaaydman 10 months ago
@Warbearer567 u hating Mughals is your choice boy but its your Ancestral choice Oh History of sikhs gmmm , lets see rebelling against the Government is rebellion, failed rebellion is TERRORISM OMG u guys began as TERRORIST oh and do u know y the Mughal Sikh WAR began? ur GURUS were SHELTERING people WHO WERE ABUSING the ISLAMIC PROPHET, so WHAT ELSE DO U EXPECT? oh and BTW, U Guys NEVER Considered yourself as INDIAN as U were totally PRO BRITISH IMPEREALISM remember READ HISTORY NOT PROPOGANDA
codyjust4u 11 months ago
@codyjust4u : There were many oppressed Muslims who were devoted to the Sikh Gurus. A majority of the Sikhs have Hindu ancestry but some Muslims converted to Sikhism as well. Mughals are hybrid race - descendants of the Turkish slaves and Genghis Khan - the tyrant who destroyed the far more civilized Persian Islamic kingdom and unleashed great terror on them.
ganeshanI1 10 months ago
@ganeshanI1 U haven't read the mughal geneology carefully, they were not slaves in recorded history and neither was gengis khan a slave in recorded history and gengis khan never reached persia in his lifetime,
codyjust4u 10 months ago
@codyjust4u : wiki : Genghis_Khan.. Although the famous Mughal Emperors were descendants of Genghis Khan and Tamerlane, they distanced themselves from the Mongol atrocities against the Khwarizim Shahs, Turks, Persians, the citizens of Baghdad and Damascus and historical figures such as Attar of Nishapur. Among the Iranian peoples, he is regarded along with Tamerlane as one of the most despised conquerors of Iran.
ganeshanI1 9 months ago
@ganeshanI1 In much of Russia, Middle East, Korea, China, Ukraine, Poland and Hungary, Genghis Khan and his regime are credited with considerable damage, destruction and loss of population.
ganeshanI1 9 months ago
@ganeshanI1 OBSERVE Gengis Khan is a Non-Muslim and Mughals are MUSLIMS and thank you for citing some info which actually supports me but GENGIS KHAN NEVER INVADED IRAN IT WAS HULAGU on Reaching the borders of the persian empire Gengis khan died, later the Mongol Karaltai voted his second son Ogedi or Mongke but its Ogedi or Toulai as the Khagan and he proceeded to penetrate in west asia
codyjust4u 9 months ago
@codyjust4u ; I stand corrected on Genghiz's religion. I thought at some point of time he adopted Islam. But anyways, the Mughals did continue many malpractices of the Mongols, e.g. Akbar carried on Genghiz's policy of choosing any married woman for her Harem, the husband was forced to divorce her. Is that an Islamic practice? If yes, it is a shame. The Mughals were highly indulgent, brutal and immoral compared to what the land had seen before them. Did Hulagu carry on Genghiz's agenda?
ganeshanI1 9 months ago
@codyjust4u (Continued) of deities without any delay. He wanted to finish ancient customs and religious and pious policies. He would not allow worship of deities, ancestors, God, prayers and association with saints and sages. Propagation of Puranic tales, importance of pilgrimages and worship of deities have all been finished.Through allurement and atrocities he has converted many Hindus to Islam. Many Hindus have been polluted after their sacred thread and vermillion were removed.
Warbearer567 9 months ago
@codyjust4u (continued) That was the Kashmiri Pandits approach Guru Tegh Bahadur for aid, Shri Guru Teg Bahadur became engrossed in deep thought after listening to the story of the Pandits.Aurangzeb felt losing ground under his feet on seeing the courage and strong religious faith of Guru Teg Bahadur. Aurangzeb flared up and gave two options to the Guru - either death or adoption of Islam. To make a long story short, Aurangzeb felt no remorse to "other peoples", his atrocities were damaging.
Warbearer567 9 months ago
@codyjust4u (Final) Guru Gobind Singh Ji and Guru Teg Bahadur Ji are the ones that showed Aurangzab the rightious paths that he can follow, in the letter of Zafarnama which is written in an exquisite Persion verse. The letter, Guru Ji reminds Aurangzeb how he and his henchmen had broken their oaths taken on the holy Koran. Zafarnama is included in Hikayats and it's the first Hikayat. Despite this deception, this treacherous leader could not harm the Guru.... And so forth
Warbearer567 9 months ago
@codyjust4u You are delusional, how the fuck did Sikhs originated as terrorists. You Mughals raping/pillaging are the fucking terrorists. You people kill in the name of the Prophet, fake Muslims. Akbar, Wazir Khan and Aurangzab are just disgusting in their actions, you just don't know that and are even happy about your tyrant leaders. Damn demons, research those people if you disagree.
Warbearer567 10 months ago
@Warbearer567 u people live in a world of lies regarding the Mughals and those lies are propounded by those of ur government people who are anti-mughal or anti-Islam in nature (may be), Aurangzeb was an emperor who had mercy in heart but ruled with an iron fist simply because he was constantly under threat like india in J&K today and i am not dumb like u i have researched a lot unlike u who just read books which they have no choice to or read biased material, some freedom of expression u got
codyjust4u 9 months ago
@Warbearer567 and U say Muslims kill in the name of Prophet is totally misleading, biased and racist and that shows u are already a RACIST and a BIASED DEMON, it like saying HINDUS KILL MUSLIMS & CHRISTIANS IN THE NAME OF POLITICAL POWER AND MANDIR WHICH IS TRUE TO SOME EXTENT and HONESTLY U ARE MAKING THIS A RELIGIOUS ISSUE which u should know is not what we are talking about here, AURANGZEB spent 2 years in a FOREST feeding the POOR by himself and TAKING WATER TO PEOPLE (MUSLIM OR NON-MUSLIM)
codyjust4u 9 months ago
@Warbearer567 as for ur question how SIKHS originated as TERRORIST u have to READ the DEFINITION, A PERSON WHO SEEKS TO OVER THROW A GOVERNMENT OF WHICH HE IS A CITIZEN IS A REBEL/TERRORIST and SIKHS WERE CITIZENS OF THE MUGHAL EMPIRE just in case u didn't know and THEY(non-Muslims) WERE ALLOWED TO HAVE THEIR OWN SET OF GOVERNMENT ADMINISTRATIVE BODIES EXCEPT FOR THE WAR DEPARTMENT and REVENUE DEPARTMENT and u used the terms such as FUCK AND FUCKING, some Manners u have WHATEVER
codyjust4u 9 months ago
i don't know if u are muslim or hindu or indian but u seriously need to stop blabbering ur wishful thinking,
oh FYI , THE FIRST AND LAST HERO OF 1857 WAR/REVOLT WAS BAKHT KHAN WHO WAS A MUSLIM SUBJECT OF MUGHAL EMPIRE BUT AN ETHNIC AFGHAN PASHTU AND NEVER SURRENDERED AND YES ALSO THE LEADING GENERAL UNDER WHOSE COMMAND MARATHAS WERE TO ACT BUT THEY DIDN'T AS HE WAS A MUGHAL MUSLIM
codyjust4u 1 year ago
@codyjust4u Just a note, do really like Mughals that much and their tyrant leaders? They have caused unparalleled chaos and torture, the massacred many innocent people. No offence but I detest them so much, the only soldiers of justice that I know who went against there brutal regime are the Sikhs, I respect my Sikhs Gurus for what bravery they have done against this evil tide, Don't forget Battle of Chamkaur! where so few defeated so many.
Warbearer567 11 months ago
@Warbearer567 tyrant leaders? the Mughals? they caused unparalleled Chaos? DO U EVEN KNOW THAT THE MUGHALS MADE INDIA A SUPER POWER AND 'INTERNATIONAL SUPER POWER' and there was NO CHAOS BECAUSE OF THEM, The SIKHS AND MARATHAS Caused CHAOS by rebelling for POWER, U detesting them is your choice and seriously make some Study Sikhs always wanted an Independent State while marathas wanted a Hindu only State none while MUGHALS wanted a ONE UNITED SOUTH ASIAN EMPIRE now India, Pakistan and Bangladesh
codyjust4u 10 months ago
@codyjust4u As I have said they massacred poor innocent people, some historians have done grave injustice to outstanding historical figures by refusing to accord them in their rightful place in history. Take a look at what Wazir Khan and Aurangzeb, what atrocities they have done, you must understand the chaos these tyrant leader have caused. The Sikhs wanted Muslims and Hindu's to unite each other to work together in friendship, Sikhism was created to neutralise the chaos.
Warbearer567 10 months ago
@Warbearer567 The sikhs wanting hindu and Islam get mixed meant Destruction of Islam & Aurangzeb and Wazir Khan were Hard line Muslims as well as well known tolerant Rulers of their time, there is not a single report of religious unrest in their time, these people banned things such and intoxicants , interest, prostitution(devdasi) , Sikhs were peaceful in the start but when they challenged the Government & wanted a kingdom problems erupted plus they sheltered people abusing the Islamic Prophet
codyjust4u 10 months ago
@codyjust4u: Aurangzeb was to Hindus and Sikhs what Hitler was to Jews. Hitler might have had some issues with the Jews personally. But, Aurangzeb though two of his fore-mothers were Hindus had nothing but hatred for people who did not follow him. He is the father of modern day Taliban.. He was a great demon who blinded and killed his noble elder brother, imprisoned his own father until his death, didn't allow his sister to be married, killed her suitor(s) and committed countless atrocities.
ganeshanI1 9 months ago
@ThePseudoBasher YOU CAN'T BLOW HOT AND COLD THE SAME TIME, MAKE UP UR MIND FIRST U SAY MUGHALS WERE BEATERN IN WAR BY THE BRITISH THEN U SAY MARATHA THEN U SAY INDIANS REVOLTED BRITISH AND MARATHAS HAS AN ALLIANCE WHICH LASTED ABOUT 15 YEARS.
ALAXANDER CAM TO THE DOORS OF DELHI which u commoners know not
codyjust4u 1 year ago
@ThePseudoBasher Alexander, Arabs, Huns, Sassanids, Mongols never came to India!!! :-O
Huns are North Asian & North Europeans so no chance of them coming to south Asia by Land,Arabs ruled india fromthe time of Muhammed Bin Kasim(r) a Great Hero of Muslim, and FYI MUGHALS WERE MONGOLS from the loins of Gengis Khan, U should also read about Ghorids and Gaznavids who were Afghans and the FIRST power to Beat the HELL OUT OF INDIA and PAKISTAN IN THE MUSLIM WORLD.
beliefs needn't be facts & V.V
codyjust4u 1 year ago
@ThePseudoBasher FYI again MIR JAFAR was not a MUGHAL SUBJECT but a SUBJECT of NAWAB OF BENGAL who was INDEPENDENT and BAHADURSHAH ZAFAR had his domain from Delhi to Agra to Lucknow.
Now I am Not a Pakistani but Pakistan is a New Nation and so its History begins from 14 Ag 1947 people like u think reading small books ins enough, make some scholarly effort if u are really sincerer
codyjust4u 1 year ago
@ThePseudoBasher (i mean King not kind) after the capture Bijapur and Ahmednagar Shahji father of Shivaji was granted Lands(Jagir) which was used by Shivaji as a recruitment center (terrorist training camp in modern day definition) Mughals did fall but only to the British as when Marathas tried to Dethrone the Mughals they were challenged from all sides as No one was ready to accept MARATHAS as EMPERORS in India
codyjust4u 1 year ago
@ThePseudoBasher Mughals were born Royals they had princely blood in them and always had titles while Maratha were Street and Mountainous people, they were originally granted land by Delhi Sultanate and NEVER HAD A KIND B4 SHIVAJI, Babur was the Grand Prince of Samarkhans who lost it and retreated to Afghanistan to his allies(Baburnama/memoirs of Babur) there after invaded India once his friend baburi returned from Turkey with Cannons invented by Muslims of Turkey
codyjust4u 1 year ago
@ThePseudoBasher : U are in serious need of studying History, read books by Abraham Erly , Mannuchi etc. Indian historians all of them agree that the British advent began in the time of Jehangir, not Shah Jahan while others say the Portuguese people already came to India before Jehangir, Cambridge book of Indian History will be very useful to u [Cambridge history of india]
codyjust4u 1 year ago
@ThePseudoBasher as i told u study deeper, 1857 was declared by indian military while Mughals were inducted as Leaders of the Revolt everywhere, And according to recorded Chronology Marathas joined in late despite of the declaration of war
codyjust4u 1 year ago
@ThePseudoBasher Find me a Single person who is not a MARATHA in his government, the mughals reigned 300+years becoz they employed people from everywhere, the Rajputs didn't support the Marathas because of Racism against them.Maratha government was a Islamic system government their agenda that Muslims are foreigners is a core agenda which includes Mughals on a larger scale
codyjust4u 1 year ago
@ThePseudoBasher : Shivaji was referred as chatrapati or whatever which was a non-recognized title for about 18 years and so called equivalent of Padshah, and i have studies indian history FYI in much more detail than u,Sambhaji betrayed Shivaji and joined he Siddhi, Shivaji was not a secular monarch like mughals as his agenda was a HINDU KINGDOM which a person of history knows and his government only MARATHA government (which is racism today)
codyjust4u 1 year ago
Alexander, Arabs, Huns, Sassanids, Mongols never came to India coz we didn't let them, even when Mughals and Delhi sultanate rulers came to India we fought back and created our own Empires UNLIKE Pakis....Mughals started declining during and post Aurangzeb era coz we Indians revolted and created own empires like Marathas and Mysore...Marathas and Mysore rulers took most of the Indian and back from Turkic Mughals...unlike you
ThePseudoBasher 1 year ago
You pakis need to study HISTORY....u are those ducks who have been easily conqored by foreigners everytime, Greeks, Mauryans, Sassanids, Guptas, Palas, Mongols, Turks, Mughals, Arabs and finally Britishers...just read ur history, you guys have never ruled urself or have started an empire, We Indians have been under foreign rule too, but for much much less time and we always kept on fighting unlike u, who bent over for every foreigner
ThePseudoBasher 1 year ago
@ThePseudoBasher you know the Mongols(Mughals), Roman and British conquered, defeated and colonized India.
munguntulga 1 year ago
And it was not those fag Turkic bastard mughals who declared 1857, it was Martahs like Peshwa Baji Rao, Nana Sahib and Gwalior Kings who started the revolt after Mangal Pandey and his soldiers went on strike/revolt against the bullets...Bahadur shah zafar was a dead duck with no territory to rule, he was a acting king backed by Britishers...it was Mughals and their appointed Turkic Nawabs like Mir jafar who started it all
ThePseudoBasher 1 year ago
The Maratha Military was never well trained, if we were to apply today's definition then they would be Militants or terrorists, Marathas based their religious policies on Mughal policies which is why Shivaji in Britain is sometimes 'emperor of islamic india' and FYI, there is NO HISTORIC GOVERNMENT RECORD FROM ARCHIVES THAT REFERS SHIVAJI OR OTHER MARATHA 'KINGS' AS HIS MAJESTY EMPEROR OF SO and SO, The Maratha MILITARY was based on nothing as they were HIT AND RUN MERCENARIES
codyjust4u 1 year ago
@codyjust4u Shivaji(an Indian btw) was the patriarch of Maratha Empire, who started an Indian empire against foreigner Mughals, his son Sambhaji expanded and took most of their territory...and unlike Mughals he was secular and dind't treat the converted Muslims badly....SHIVAJI WAS REFERRED AS "CHATRAPATI"...have u even read history or u have just watch Pakistan TV??
ThePseudoBasher 1 year ago
Mughals made South Asia their Home, brought peace, prosperity while Delhi Sultanate was not brutal it was just losing its efficiency in holding power due to unruly governors, When Europeans first attempted to capture India in the time of jehangir about 7 of 15 ships were sunk by Mughal Rockets, that alarmed the europeans to stay away from South Asia, Marathas were some what street people whom we say street rats they were so inefficient that they continued with Mughal System of Administration
codyjust4u 1 year ago
@codyjust4u Mughals brought peace??, prosperity??...and now even delhi sultanate was not brutal??...Europeans made their way in Shah jahan's time....Maraths were not street people, thats like saying that Mughals were street people of Uzbekistan.......Marathas started expanding during and after Aurangzeb's reign....and created a 2 million sq. km large empire(one of the largest in Sub continent ever)...Mughals fell ike a pack of cards after Maratha rose
ThePseudoBasher 1 year ago
here is ur History lesson, Amir Timur was a descendant of Gengis khan through his son Jochi's 10th concubine, Babur was a son of Emir Omar Shaikh Mirza of Farghana,who was descended by Jochi's 4th wife, Babur made India Humayun's Home which is why he is Buried in India as per the will of Babur and babur was burried in Kabul by Sher Shah Sur(read more its too lengthy) Akber was an illiterate man which is why he couldn't fight much wars making peace by marring about 60 wives(disputed)
codyjust4u 1 year ago
@ThePseudoBasher as for ur comment about mughals licking british feet, u should know that the maratha generals deserted the Army in 3rd battle of panipat and desertion is a COWARDS act while only about 200 of mughal soldiers returned alive,[thank u marathas for making india a british slave] Mughals made India an international power as they had International Standards while Marathas knew nothing about controlling a country
codyjust4u 1 year ago
@ThePseudoBasher seriously indians need to study history in its reality and not read political propaganda,first: it was the marathas who were first to make peace with british,when tipu sultan declared war marathas were bought of by the british,mughals were treating india and indians as their own while british were treating india as property,it was mughals who declared 1857 war and marathas joined in after 8 months during that time they were busy making peace with the british which failed
codyjust4u 1 year ago
@Pakistan899m I am full Indian, i dont need to prove my Indianess to a man who supports foreign barbarians....I support marathas, rajputs who fought these assholes and threw them out later....ur a mullah i guess for whom every muslim has to be a good guys, irresepective of the fact that he invaded ur country and looted it
ThePseudoBasher 1 year ago
@ThePseudoBasher The mughals conquered India and took it away from the really cruel turkish delhi sultanate and they rebuilt delhi which had been destroyed by one of their ancestors. Everyone wants power it is just a natural part of being a human being but the point I am trying to make is that a ruler should be openminded and be tolerant of all religions and that is how Akbar was. I think you should read more about the mughals specifically instead of just the Hindu indian side.
Pakistan899 1 year ago
@ThePseudoBasher The mughals conquered India and took it away from the really cruel turkish delhi sultanate and they rebuilt delhi which had been destroyed by one of their ancestors(timur). Everyone wants power it is just a natural part of being a human being but the point I am trying to make is that a ruler should be openminded and be tolerant of all religions and that is how Akbar was. I think you should read more about the mughals specifically instead of just the Hindu indian side.
Pakistan899 1 year ago
From pakistan899 to ThePseudoBasher You just hate muslims as a whole there is no real reason behind it you r just a crazy person who is confused. And muslim is not a race of any kind. There are white muslims, black muslims, brown muslims, and asian muslims. No I do not suck on anything you do with your confused mind. like hitler who was part jewish but had all the jews killed. you have indian blood but you still support british barbaric and unjustified rule for simply white domination.
Pakistan899 1 year ago
Great empire.
MughalistanSipahi 1 year ago
are u crazy? Rajpits hated Mughals....its a legend here how much Rajputs hated Mughals, how Maharana Pratap the bravest and best Rajput King ever died fighting these turk bastards...Mughals are considered plunderers by Indians, u are a muslim, u people never support ur country but only muslims, thats why Qasim, mughals, Ghauris and Ghaznis are ur heros who looted and invaded India
ThePseudoBasher 1 year ago
to ThePseudoBasher from Pakistan899: The early Mughals were allies of the Hindu kings( including Rajputs) and the Rajputs only hated Jahangir and other Mughal kings after them. They liked Akbar for his consideracy and open-mindedness. My dad was born in what is now Pakistan but his family comes from Hyderabad India which makes me Indian and Pakistani. You are something that thinks he is Indian but is actually a Britisher left behind for being so stupid.
Pakistan899 1 year ago
@Pakistan899 and even mughals stole a lot from us, Rajputs hated Mughals, Maharana Pratap died fighting those bastards, you are a paki so anything muslim will be good for u
ThePseudoBasher 1 year ago
@ThePseudoBasher The British stole from India which is why India, Pakistan, and Bangladesh is in such problems right now. The British also enslaved our people and took them to places like South Africa and other places in the gulf of mexico. And when the muslims wanted a separate part of India they granted it but they left Kashmir disputed so that we would be fighting while they keep all the riches. If you want to shove anything shove a British dick in your mouth to keep it shut.
Pakistan899 1 year ago
@Pakistan899 You like Mughals just coz they were MUSLIMS...lets be honest, it was we Indians like marathas who fought Britishers, i dont need to learn from an asshole Mughals licking prick like you who is good for my country and who is not.....After aurnagzeb we Indians took back most of our territory but Delhi was still inder these mughals and hence britishers came
ThePseudoBasher 1 year ago
@ThePseudoBasher You just hate the Mughals because they were Muslims. I am a Muslim but I respect hindus. I do not just like the Mughals just because of they were Muslims(the delhi sultanate was ruled by muslim kings but I don't like them because they are the reason of the fighting between the muslims and hindus). The mughals didn't find the britishers as a threat which is why they didn't fight them. By the way what side r u on British or Indian?
Pakistan899 1 year ago
@Pakistan899 i wont argue u with u, as a muslim(that too a paki) you are programmed to love every muslim thing, You people celebrate Qasim's vicotry over YOUR King of Dahir, so u can imagine how ur minds work. Mughal were Foreigners who invaded our country and were thrown out by marathas from most parts. I am an INDIAN first, and for me Mughals and Britshers were same, Britishers were a lill better.
ThePseudoBasher 1 year ago
@ThePseudoBasher The British stole from India which is why India, Pakistan, and Bangladesh is in such problems right now. The British also enslaved our people and took them to places like South Africa and other places in the gulf of mexico. And when the muslims wanted a separate part of India they granted it but they left Kashmir disputed so that we would be fighting while they keep all the riches. If you want to shove anything shove a British dick in your mouth to keep it quiet
Pakistan899 1 year ago
Britishers have done more for India than Mughals....Both Mughals and Britishers were foreigners....if i have to pick one...I will pick Britishers.
ThePseudoBasher 1 year ago
@ThePseudoBasher what kind of indian are you? I am sorry are you even indian because the british didn't build the Taj Mahal, they didn't protect India like they promised to do so. Instead they used pig meat to make weapons. They stole from India and took away money, gold and silver for their bitch ass queen
Pakistan899 1 year ago
@Pakistan899 Britishers gave us One of the earliest railways networks in the world, telephone network and telgraph network, WTF do u wanna do with Taj mahal, stuff it in ur ass....India has many tourist locations which attract more tourists than taj mahal....even mughals looted our Gold and silver, mughlas were not Indians they were turks
ThePseudoBasher 1 year ago
@ThePseudoBasher The mughals werent turks they were descendants of the mongols and the later mughals(everyone after Akbar) were born and raised in India(which makes them Indians). The Taj Mahal is called "the most beautiful building in the world" and it is also one of the wonders of the world which is a main reason why India tourists. I am not defending the later mughals(Jahangir, Shah Jahan, or Aurengzeb) who I agree did steal from India I am defending people like Akbar(best ruler India).
Pakistan899 1 year ago
@Pakistan899 lol....how were they INDIANS? they were Turks, if an Indians family lives in US, it will always be an INDIAN family not a US one(thats just on papers)....Taj mahal is not the most visited place in India, Rajasthan and Kerala is....Mughals and Britishers were same imperialists....Britishers were more sophisticated than Mughals and ruled most of the world not just one country.
ThePseudoBasher 1 year ago
@ThePseudoBasher the British ruled most of the world for their egoistic white domination idea. The Mughals weren't turks they were descendants of the Mongols( mughal means mongol in Persian). The later mughals married indian women(Akbar married the Rajput Jodhaa and had kids with her). So the mughals were Indians too and they respected and loved India. The British took the last mughal king to Britain and he wrote some poetry about his love for India and him wanting to die in India.
Pakistan899 1 year ago
@Pakistan899 Jodha was just on of her queen, he had 36 queens, he was not Indian, read mughal record how much they hated Indians(including u pakis)......India was a territory for them...as i said u just like him coz he made u muslim,,,simple u guys will always like muslim how bad they might be.
ThePseudoBasher 1 year ago
@ThePseudoBasher like i said the delhi sultanate was muslim and i don't like them. Akbar had only 4 wives not an exaggerated 36. And Islam has been in India before even the mughals were in India. And pakistan wasn't even created yet so how could they even hate Pakistanis? They didn't hate indians they liked them. I don't hate just for the heck of it I have reasoning behind it. You just hate muslims straight out which makes you a crazy egoistic person
Pakistan899 1 year ago
@Pakistan899 He had 36 queens, unlike you who have just watched Bollywood films i guess, i have read history in London, Mughals hated Indians and only treated them like Subjects, They hated pakis(as a part of India) Islam in India spreaded mainly in Mughal era, Mughal started declining during and after Aurangzeb era coz Indians hated them, Indians like Marathas fought back and threw them out from most of the territory.
ThePseudoBasher 1 year ago
@ThePseudoBasher Akbar had 4 wives(2 were hindus, 1 was muslim, and the other was christian). Get your facts straight before starting an argument. Mughals didn't hate indians they liked them which is why there are still muslims in India. I read books unlike you who suck britishes dicks while listening to stories that they make up. Maybe my ancestors became muslims under the mughal dynasty or maybe not there is no saying.
Pakistan899 1 year ago
@Pakistan899 lolo....i dont suck anybody...I am an Indian...you are sucking up to these turk bastards coz they are muslims.......and btw, plz read History...he had 36 Queens....36!!....Indians hated them how the fuck do u know it paki....Marathas threw these bastards out....Marthas were Indians who we are proud of not these invaders who looted our country...Mughals are hated coz of their invasion, Rajputs, Jats, Marathas all hate these bastards
ThePseudoBasher 1 year ago
@ThePseudoBasher you need to READ HISTORY not me. I know my history you don't. You think you are Indian but you arent. The Mughals were descendents of the Mongols (Mughal means mongol in Persian). The Mughals spoke Persian so how were they turks? The early mughals were supported by the Rajputs but the later ones weren't. Akbar liked Indians which is why he had Hindu Indian advisors too (Birbal, and Todarmal). And I hate you, you god damn FIRANGI. GO SUCK A BRITISH DICK
Pakistan899 1 year ago
@Pakistan899 lol........now u saying that Mughals were not even turks??????.....Maharana Pratap died fighting these barbarians to save India....rajputs hated Mughals....some of them also supported Brits to save their empires, that makes Brits Indian too i guess...keep on sucking foreign muslim dicks....thats the reality of all u muslims of subcontinent....ur a loser race and will always be, no independent history, nothing....keep on sucking up to these turkic bastards
ThePseudoBasher 1 year ago
@ThePseudoBasher Ive been saying that they werent turks what the hell r u talking about? The brits hated India which is why they were imperialists of it. Maharana wanted just to rule India and Akbar wanted the same thing but Akbar chose to first try to make peace with Maharana before attacking his city. The Mughals weren't barbarians but I do disagree with what happened at Chitor fort. The Rajputs only hated the later mughals they liked Akbar which is why he was called Akbar(great one) in arabic
Pakistan899 1 year ago
@Pakistan899 OMG...typical paki......maharanas were Indians who wanted to defend their territoryhow can u compare maharanas with these foreign bastards who invaded our Country....go and read history u have been watching too many bollywood films i guess
ThePseudoBasher 1 year ago
@ThePseudoBasher Rajputs only fought the later mughals, not Akbar because they liked him. I study history books unlike you who just listen to whatever the brits tell you. I am not a mullah I am an average muslim who likes the history of India. I am supportive to whoever is a good person I am not a person who just likes others based on their religion, nationality or race. There were people who called themselves muslims but did bad things i dont support em people should be judged individually.
Pakistan899 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Pakistan899 lolo....i dont suck to anybody...I am an Indian...you are sucking up to these turk bastards coz they are muslims.......and btw, plz read History...he had 36 Queens....36!!....Indians hated them how the fuck do u know it paki....Marathas threw these bastards out....Marthas were Indians who we are proud of not these invaders who looted our country...Mughals are hated coz of their invasion, Rajputs, Jats, Marathas all hate these bastards...we know our History
ThePseudoBasher 1 year ago
@maratibalishad
The Mughals defended India from foreigners while the Marathas allowed the British, being the first Indian power to make Peace with the British, SUCK ON THAT, there was no such thing called india that time, it was the MUGHAL EMPIRE
codyjust4u 1 year ago
@codyjust4u lol....it was Marathas who fought Britishers, it was ppl like Nana Sahib and Gwalior Kings who fought Britishers....mughals were licking Britsh feet in their small empire coz marathas took lot of their territory...Mughals were not Indians they were Turk from Uzbekistan, who occupied India
ThePseudoBasher 1 year ago
@ThePseudoBasher There wasn't any golden age of british controlled India they were all bandits. They took everything away from India and stole all the riches. Akbar helped India and appointed Rajputs. What did the British do? Huh?
Pakistan899 1 year ago
Respond to this video... then the filthy english came in and stole all our jewelry
towhidskynet 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
watch interesting stuff
@
mubashiromar.blogspot.com/
mubashiromar 1 year ago
Mughals were Uzbeks......babur was a descendant of Chengiz Khan.......they were not Indians.......99% of Indian and pakistani muslims, who are just a result of conversion and who hate hate Indian aka Hindu culture should feel ashamed of themself abt how they hate their own past
ThePseudoBasher 1 year ago
I am looking for formal and informal educational systems in the times of these Mughal empires; can anybody help?
maratibalishad 1 year ago
these mughals didnot promoted science that is we r backward
073ali 1 year ago
where did u take the background music from??
can u plzzzz tell me,, its really gr8
anchal1901 1 year ago
We Indians got independence after 200 years, hence, unable to rule the country. Always bad governance. Every newpapers & channel show crime stories. Every day thousands of crimes take place. Who taught to do all these crimes? Mughals? How subordinates like us can rule the country properly? The power is in BEGGERS' hand since independence. Muslims haven't been given jobs in Govt. Sector in aspect to their ratio, hence India hasn't became the BEST in the world.
sameerraja999 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
If you see his Grave you will come to know that how simple it is and is nearby below the grave of his childhood Teacher.That actually proves the Greatness of the Greatest Moghul Emperor AURANGZEB ALAMGIR.
sameerraja999 1 year ago
It is not reasonable to hate other communities because their ancestors have done something wrong. Aurangzeb was most religious & honest ruler India ever had. He fought against his rival rulers not against a 'COMMUNITY'. There were very few people against him. His entire territory was so happy, lived with harmony. His commander-in-chief was a Hindu. There were many Hindus & Sikhs in his military. He demolished those temples where prostitution was running (very few in numbers).
sameerraja999 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
We Indians are very stupid who accepted the history written by the British historians. We are still fighting! These fight/hate/anger was cultivated by the Britishers. They have manipulated Indian History like ancient pandits manipulated Hindu Scriptures (very big tragedy). We stupids accepted each n every word of British. Reproach on those British who did this. Now, it's time to work for construction & development not for hating, blaming, abusing or criticizing.
sameerraja999 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
We Indians are 'British Historians' Book Warm'. Moghals came India with wealth; ruled India, people happy & prosperous, became Indian, died as Indian, almost all burried in India aftr making India Gold Bird.
Britishers ruled India, splitted communities, so many riots, they looted India, ran away from India after cultivating seeds of hatred, riots & disputes.
Indian ruling India, earning money illegally, depositting in Swiss bank, so currupts, screwing-in Mother land. Who is the best ruler?
sameerraja999 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Mughals taught Indians to wear 'CHAPPAL' too. We didn't even have etiquettes of wearing slippers. Common people had no sense of wearing it. Hindus were very impressed of their culture, and adopted. That's why Rajasthanis women put their 'PALLU' on their heads. Mughals didn't force to wear Burqa to Hindu women, but order to hide atleast their faces not be seen by strangers. Such etiquettes are imported by Muslims in India.
sameerraja999 1 year ago
I hope all of them are burning in hell
malikpa83 1 year ago
Fuck those Mughal monkeys. The people of the same ethnicity should not be proud of their primitive ancestors.
prettynoose89 1 year ago
"aryan" tameem take your chink chong semite mongrel mutt ass back into the shithole you came from. if you cant decide. we'll do it for you. your upper body back to maternal semitic harem ancestry of arabia. and your lower body back to your paternal chink rapist ancestry of central asia.
xXBlackxRebelXx 1 year ago
Where is this instrumental from?
Thanks
humanseasons 1 year ago
They looks like turks .
aszkanfederation28 1 year ago
There's still alot of Mughal influence in Pakistan.
Dancing,Architect,Dress,Food ect ect.
There's much more Mughal influence in Pakistan than there is in India.
cavegirl1985 2 years ago
@cavegirl1985 yes - and of course the language - Urdu...Mughal influence exisits wherever the empire was... afte partition a lot of mughal monuments were destroyed - especially mosques
gaziman 1 year ago
Allah u Akbar لاالله الاالله محمد رسول الله
mazyoonaa87 2 years ago
@mazyoonaa87 allah whoah gay bar.
xXBlackxRebelXx 1 year ago
abe saloo mughal ne to tumhari maa ko chood ke chal diye ab tum bhokte baithe hoon.apni gaand me ungli dalo aur khujate baitho
amxkhan 2 years ago
@amxkhan abe teri maa ko choda hai isliye tum abhi musalund hai jao bhosudike
loverboyjkr69 2 years ago
the mughals got wiped out by the sikhs in punjab
nolimithighs 2 years ago
Comment removed
hynixx 2 years ago
because the british backed them in doing so. when the british came into india, they were stunned to see that their form of subjugated the people, along with their secret religions that the rulers followed, were very similar to what they already had in england.
issareign 2 years ago
@nolimithighs is there a specific name of those sikhs?(cast or something)
182popeye 1 year ago
after rulling 300 years.
ohwahwah 1 year ago
@nolimithighs when a great empire was on it's knees, old and wayward infact at the point the sikhs came to power the Mughal dynasty had gone. But anyway there is n othing courageous about what you Sikhs did - if you had ahlf the courage, alent of the Mughals you would have held power for more than a mere blip in hisotry!!.... and dont forget you sided witht he europeans too.
DevilishhhhGuy 1 year ago
@nolimithighs wiped out?yes they managed to win in Punjab after many years of fighting but the the Punjabis were wiped out by the Afghans then the British
slimshadythe2nd 1 year ago
Comment removed
Moebab 1 year ago
God bless the Mughals
LONG LIVE THE MUGHALS !!!
BrownSugar4You 2 years ago 2
they are driving rickshaws nowdays
varuntripathi1 2 years ago
are you a one of the sons of mughals.
ohwahwah 1 year ago
@ohwahwah whai i was telling is fact,,and you can confirm it on google..
they are driving rickshaws in delhi,,
varuntripathi1 1 year ago
@varuntripathi1 well i saw videos of thsoe drivers they are majority pathans not mughals.
ohwahwah 1 year ago
@varuntripathi1 so are you lol
gaziman 1 year ago
@gaziman why you pray so loud,,is luulah deaf?
varuntripathi1 1 year ago
yes
sohaibzahid 1 year ago
@BrownSugar4You Mughal Empire will Rule India once Again!
Moebab 1 year ago
@Moebab Unless you are a Mongol-Rajput hybrid you are no Mughal. Because all of emperors from Akbar the great and down were of birthed from rajput princess,excluding Aurangzeb. Look at Babur,who looks likes a Mongoloid and know look at the last emperor and his children and wife.Which looks nothing like Mongols.
JacobTheIndoAmerican 1 year ago
Comment removed
Moebab 1 year ago
@Moebab I'm not saying I am a Mughal, all I was saying that the Mughal Empire was a great one. They intermarried with Indians, I know that!
Moebab 1 year ago
@Moebab I am a Christian, but yes my ancestors are Hindus long time ago, and I am sure yours were too. And a lot of those rajput mothers were Hindus man. Yes they were great, but some were NOT great to Muslims,Hindus,Sikh alike. Must of these emperors were power hunger alcoholic, sex hunger, murders, etc then true Muslims. People like our last president abul kalam in my opinion are true Muslims, dont get me wrong there are those fake hindus,Christians,Sikhs,etc too every where.
JacobTheIndoAmerican 1 year ago
and british were robbers international robbers right u english pig
hibyehi2002 2 years ago 10
@hibyehi2002 ,
you are fucked son of these robbers.
nvlchauhan 11 months ago
@hibyehi2002 ,
white skin muslims are fucked son of these robbers.
nvlchauhan 11 months ago
mughals were TERRORISTS.
redmond12400 2 years ago
They terrorized your mom didn't they lol
check my vids out
PAKIZFOLYFE786 2 years ago
Aurangzeb freakin BS burn in hell Aameen
SWADESH24 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
fuck allah
myidentityus2000 3 years ago
u fucking ass hole......a piece of shit...a part of a mortary.....lunatic...mother fucker....bitch/basterd.....swine....leave ths earth n burn in d hell....fucker..
rockinggal812 2 years ago
The last Mughal Emperor was Bahadur Shah Zafar who was dethorned by British savages in 1857.
congiestale 3 years ago
Atrocities by christians
Thousands of innocent people killed by these fanatics during crusades.Inquisition-When 800 yr, Arab rule ended, all Muslim and Jews were expelled or forcibly converted converted to and later burned in stakes.20 million people shipped form Africe to the Americas as slave.Aparthield-Millions of people were subjected to institutional subjugation.From Hitler to Stalin to Musolini to Truman to Milosovich, the greatest murders in human history were all born to this faith.
kapitop 4 years ago 11
This has been flagged as spam show
Atrocities by Islam
Allah ass fucked Mohammed when he was 9 years old
Mohammed fucked a pig when the pig was 9 years old
Allah and Mohammed fucked a 60 year old whore and then raped a 9 year old girl.
Mohammed came up with a new religion called Islam which compeled women to take part in orgies with pigs and other farm animals.
Mohammed declares Allah as God in Islam even though Allah is his pedofilic sex partner
bobog26 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
wt d fucking hell do u no anY THNG OF islam..have u ever known it properly....there is no divine power LIKE ALLAH...u lard...u fucker....fucking...ur fucking 4m whn u wr of 9mnths....u chuuuuu.....converted people like us can only understand d power n grace of ISLAM....at least v respect all religions n dnt abuse other religions like u...ths is d biggest g8ness of us...RESPECT UR RELIGION N AS WEL AS OF OTHERS N DNT LET ANY1 COMPLAIN ABT IT 2U.....U FUCKER...
rockinggal812 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
OK OK If you are so desparate to get ur FUCK on with me ,it can be arranged, I will both Praise ALLAH and fuck you at the same time. HAPPY NOW SWEETY
bobog26 2 years ago
Comment removed
rockinggal812 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Done i accept Islam "Praise Allah" now must drop ur pants and bend over for me dear sister for incestial sex is allowed in Islam, I wanna grab you from the back with your naked ass in front of me and then i hit it from the back real hard "Allah u Akbar"
bobog26 2 years ago