Added: 5 years ago
From: Hurricane810kr
Views: 3,573,666
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (5,457)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Missed once xD

  • haha miss 1 Target:D..nice shooting

  • i shot M4 with surpressor its in my vidios on my channel its sounds nothing like that

  • UNLOAD

  • It's funnier when you don't watch the video, and just hear

  • @axium403 hahaha that is fucking halarious

  • fuck you americans

  • SOUND. If referring to flash suppression, the word flash is always involved. A flash suppressor just suppresses muzzle flash while a "suppressor" does both sound and flash. Just like you army fucks to have no idea what your talking about, yet still act as if you do. SEMPER FI

  • Bigplayer, your a fucking idiot! And you give infantry a bad name for sounding like one. Even if you did train using "silencers" in the army, its no surprise they taught you wrong. Plus, the military usually uses SUREFIRE suppressors. Go to their website an tell me what they call it. Sgunn1911, although comparing to a movie, is 100% dead on. Silencers only exist if it's actually making the shot silent...hence the name! Usually when someone says suppressor, its referring to the suppression of SO

  • what optic is that?!

    

  • those guns with supressors are still loud, i know the ping is the target being hit but still.

  • Great video keep up the good work.

  • nerd

  • So cool, he is shooting a 25 yard target using thumb over bore method. Thats awesome for a distance that a hand gun can easily shoot.

  • So many headshots.

  • Are you using subsonic rounds in this video? Couldn't hear the supersonic crack. If so, what type/brand are you using?

  • what army this guy in he miss like 3 shots out of alot

  • AR's are so loud, I doubt the effectiveness of a silencer. Even at a gun range, ar's are disturbingly loud lol

  • Was that tom knapp saying upload? hahahahha

  • sounds like youre shooting metal

  • THIS IS A MESSAGE TO ALL WHO LOVE FREEDOM AND WOULD DEFEND THE CONSTITUTION AND THE BILL OF RIGHTS FROM FOREIGN AND DOMESTIC TERRORISTS.

    Barack Obama, just recently, signed the Bill which allows for martial law in the Unites States, completely getting rid of our 1st and 4th amendment right and further enslaved us.

    PLEASE KEEP ON BUYING GUNS, BUT DO NOT USE THEM FOR VIOLENCE OR ANARCHY.

    PLEASE COPY AND SPREAD THIS INFO AROUND AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE.

    GOD BLESS THOSE WHO PROTECT FREEDOM.

    PEACE.

  • Treembea.... Yea they can have my guns when im fuckin dead

  • PtingPtingPtingPtingPtingPting­­PtingPtingPtingPtingPtingPtin­g­PtingPtingPtingPtingPtingPti­ng­PtingPtingPtingPtingPtingPt­ing­PtingPtingPtingPtingPtingP­ting­PtingPtingPtingPtingPting­Pting­PtingPtingPtingPtingPtin­gPting­PtingPtingPtingPtingPti­ngPting­PtingPtingPtingPtingPt­ingPting­PtingPtingPtingPtingP­tingPting­PtingPtingPtingPting­PtingPting­PtingPtingPtingPtin­gPtingPting­PtingPtingPtingPti­ngPtingPting­PtingPtingPtingPt­ingPtingPting­PtingPtingPtingP­tingPtingPting­PtingPtingPting­Pting

  • Sub sonic rifle rounds? are they?

  • 1000 dollars for a fucking suppressor? I'd rather buy a new gun, plus i like the loudness of guns.

  • @MRcalibrecincuenta They're expensive, and they were never meant for civilian use. But hey, just be happy that we can still get them, or even guns, who knows how far anti-gun A-holes will get.

  • THE MOST RELIABLE FULL-AUTO RUGER 10/22 .22LR SUB MACHINE GUN ON THIS EARTH. We are living in the 'golden age' of firearm design & modification. Look at this wild thing on my YouTube. GSV sells a DVD video explaining an easy way the convert any semi-auto Ruger 10/22 rifle into a true full-auto. All other Ruger full-auto conversions suffer from 'bolt-bounce / light-strikes' which cause many malfunctions. GSV conversions have been tested with no malfunctions.

    GUN SLINGER VIDEOS

    Call 425-293-5977

  • @Truth Teller 878 you need a federal fire arms licence to own a full auto

  • @metalfrommaine A full auto and suppressor fall under the same category. All you need is a Form 4 tax stamp.

  • Hey, I've been looking for a certain suppressor, I don't know what it's called, but I do remember is when the suppressor is on the weapon, it looks like its integrated into the weapon, even though it isn't. It covers the entire outer barrel of the weapon as well as extends out past the natural end of the gun. If anyone has any idea what I'm talking about, or knows who makes something like that, thanks.

  • @Treembea it's called a reflux type suppressor. There is one called an aries. Too bad it's above most people's price range.

  • 0:01 ohhp ya missed one

  • shooting a suppressed m4 at a steel plate...they'll never hear ya comin

  • were you using subsonic ammunition?

  • Epic "Unlooooaaaaad" is epic :D

  • is not a suppressor. is a silencer. has been called this since creation. also you not need to wear combat gear to a shooting range.it make you look stupid. oh and your shit $3000 gun that jams every other mag is not full auto is pathetic. capitalist pig, thinking he need every shit piece of plastic to says fagpul. maybe you get real rifle and fire many round through it so you maybe hit largest side of shithouse without eoshit tacticrap weighting down rifle like downs syndrome weigh your brain.

  • @DoctorAsshole1 Wrong. This is a suppressor. You have suppressor and silencer mixed up. A silencer makes practically NO sound at all, while a suppressor simply reduces the back pressure and lowers the sound made by a few decibels. You can still hear the gun pretty well, and the suppressor is pretty small so you can tell it's not a silencer. Silencers are MUCH longer than this, and cost a lot more. Plus, you have to use special rounds for a silencer to work. I own this same thing

  • @TrackStar828 I would like to buy a silencer. Could you please name a model?

  • @TrackStar828 Good Lord... "Silencer" is the same thing as "Suppressor"... You may own the "same thing", but I SELL the same things... (I've also owned a large number of firearms, C3 and not). It's called a "suppressor" because it DOES NOT SILENCE a shot, even when it's an "integral suppressor" (i.e. Hi-Standard .22 or MP5SDx), although with subsonic ammunition it IS very quiet.

    Oh, a suppressor CAN be used with supersonic ammunition, it makes it VERY difficult to hear the shooter

  • @antiflag1080 You are wrong, once again. Silencers are used to silence the sound of the weapon's discharge. Suppressors are used to reduce or eliminate the muzzle flash of the weapon. By default, it has some ability to retard the sound of the weapon firing, but isn't specifically designed to reduce or eliminate sound. All in all, suppressors and silencers are different. I wouldn't buy anything from you with the ignorance about guns you are displaying to me.

  • @TrackStar828 I think you're mistaken. A flash suppressor will reduce the flash, but not the sound. A silencer/suppressor is the same thing. On the ATF paperwork they are called 'silencers', but people also refer to them as suppressors. However, a flash suppressor is not a sound suppressor. You might want to be a little more educated on your terms before you start being so accusatory with your comments.

  • @Lekotheshaman Eh, I got a little confused. Understood, I think I was pissed off when I made that comment so my apologies. Thanks for the clarification.

  • @antiflag1080 (part 2 of my comment) Oh and yes silencers don't eliminate the sound of the bullet, there is still a slight cracking sound with certain weapons. If you honestly believe silencers and suppressors are the same, you have some issues brother. They are used FOR DIFFERENT THINGS. Please, quit your job of selling guns or whatever. You have no idea what you are talking about.

  • @antiflag1080 Before you reply, I think we are talking about two different things. I am referring to flash suppressors, whilst you are talking about silencers/suppressors. Yes, they are the same thing, but flash suppressors are different from "silencers" or suppressors. It gets confusing arguing over the internet.

  • @DoctorAsshole1 I didn't even understand any of your insults just then... :D

  • That's not piston driven. You can see the gas block clear as day. 

  • sexy gun. I want to have sex with it.

  • very good shot

  • Looks like your standard 100yd pistol range, Chances are he is hitting 2-4" reset targets.

    I imagine he has more than $3000 invested in his setup, probably opted for a gas piston and higher grade internals easy $1k extra.

  • needs more cowbell.

  • I want an RPG with a suppressor

  • @MrINSANEguitar69056

    Not sure if...... greatest idea ever or overly optimistic

  • He looks like Ryan Gosling, and the way he hit those targets consistently, he must be some kind of SF or SFSG

  • @MajorLiteral Just because he is hitting the target consistently doesnt mean he could be either SF or SFSG. For all we know that metal/steel target could be10'x10' lol. Not trying to rant on you but everyone thinks the target is 1x1 or something

  • @secretpolice Well you can see him moving slightly on the split second intervals of when he doesnt fire. Shows that there are targets lined up next to each other. Plus he handles the recoil ridiculously well and scans his targets in the same position when he has finished firing, this is something the SF and SFSG drill into their operatives heads.

  • What was that little diddle left and right for at the end? If he's out, who's he shooting at?

  • so this is how the chinese name their children.

  • awesome

  • @ShinAkumaEX thats because its mw3

  • wtf m4 sucks man, cm901 with silencer is better

  • @captainprice4827 they both fire the 5.56 and basicly do the same thing, btw this isnt a video game

  • @TheGhilliSniper no cause cm901 is more powerful n is better with silencer n its the 7.62 version of it dumbass

  •  this shows that the silencers don't make the guns sound less than a fart, they still produce 120 decibeles (or however is written) a shot

  • Silence is golden but a suppressor is black

  • @xsychosis to bad thats not a suppressor, its a silencer. dont get confused... suppressor suppresses the muzzle flash... silencer silences the weapon.. go on and question me

    -US army infantry

  • @bigplayer2382 thats great do u want a cookie

  • @xsychosis chocolate chip preferably 

  • @bigplayer2382 Suppressor and silencer are terms that are often used interchangeably. If you were to say just suppressor, it refers to a sound suppressor - search the word suppressor in google and see what you get for results. A flash suppressor will help reduce the flash of a weapon in low light conditions. If anyone is confused here, it's you.

  • @Lekotheshaman no your stupid... sound suppressor and silencer can be used interchangeably but when you say normally just "suppressor", its referring to flash suppressor. HENCE why its called a silencer/sound suppressor anywhere and everywhere not "suppressor"

  • @bigplayer2382 If it's a silencer then why isn't it silent? I was under the impression that a flash suppressor is for muzzle flash only and a suppressor is for both muzzle flash and suppressing the decibel level of the shot. I've also seen "experts" correcting people for years when they call it a silencer. But most of all, in the movie "The A-Team" they say "it's a suppressor, not a silencer"!!!

  • @sgunn911 dear god, your basing your arguement on another impossible movie that relates NOTHING to real life.. and also based on your arguement that meants there is a type of silencer that does not hide the muzzle flash.. which is impossible. like i said.. ill call your "expert" and ill raise you military infantry service -.-

  • Loving the weapon's furniture

  • @Bigfrie192 What "furniture"? It's all original.

  • @wojtuniakfrog No its not. He has a KAC RIS System and other Magpul externals like the stock and grip.

  • How chinese people name their kinds PING PING PING

  • @DEVGRUSCOUT You just copied someone else's highest rated comment, faggot.

  • Call the President...We're gonna need more cow bell.

  • PtingPtingPtingPtingPtingPting­PtingPtingPtingPtingPtingPting­PtingPtingPtingPtingPtingPting­PtingPtingPtingPtingPtingPting­PtingPtingPtingPtingPtingPting­PtingPtingPtingPtingPtingPting­PtingPtingPtingPtingPtingPting­PtingPtingPtingPtingPtingPting­PtingPtingPtingPtingPtingPting­PtingPtingPtingPtingPtingPting­PtingPtingPtingPtingPtingPting­PtingPtingPtingPtingPtingPting­PtingPtingPtingPtingPtingPting­PtingPtingPtingPtingPtingPting­PtingPtingPtingPtingPtingPting­PtingPtingPtingPting...... UNLOAAAADDD

  • @101touge

    You copy and paste my comment im not dumb :)

  • @101touge YOU MISS dick

  • @101touge you just spoilerd me

  • @101touge don't mean to be a troll but the M4 only holds 30 rounds haha

  • @jman280292 it hold as many as the clip installed in it. so if you have a hundred round drum clip, then it will fire a hundred rounds.

  • how much do these even cost ???

  • @leemillar141 The rifle or suppressor? The suppressor is about $1000 - $800 + $200 in taxes, plus whatever transfer fees a dealer would charge. A mil-spec M4 will be around $1000 as well, add about $400 for a KAC RAS, Magpul stock & grip, and whatever other little add ons. The Aimpoint and LaRue mount is about $500. All total you're looking around $3000 for the setup.

  • @Hurricane810kr nice now all i have to do is make them legal over here lol but thanks for the info :)

  • @Hurricane810kr I recommend you search and assess your targets (like look left and right) while keeping breaking your cheek weld on the stock of the gun. If you stayed fixed in the tube your unfortunately losing situational awareness like having tunnel vision. Still impressive shooting though, I like your consistent trigger pulls.

  • @Hurricane810kr Thats not a bad price for all of that.

  • @Hurricane810kr mil-spec m4 for $1k? where would you get that

  • @songofthebong A Colt 6920 is about as basic as it gets if you want a 'milspec' 16" carbine for around $1000. You can buy or build your own for a little cheaper and get the same reliability with some research and get the furniture/sights/grip/trigger/­etc. that you want.

  • @li7in6

    Bravo Company USA makes some great mil-spec rifles/parts for a great price, but they are usually overbooked and have a waiting period. 

  • @Hurricane810kr well you cant own a suppressor without a federal firearms license so you need one of those first.

  • @metalfrommaine That's not technically true. In the U.S. anyone that can legally own a firearm can legally own a suppressor, you do not need an FFL. What you DO need is a completed ATF Form 4 and the tax stamp. It is a $200 tax stamp for any Class III (NFA) Weapon. It's a hurdle to jump through but it can be painlessly done.

  • @TawodiDalonige I thought silencers were illegal in some states, aren't they?

  • @snork707 they are legal in most states, i think like 38 of them.

  • @snork707 not in most states, but you need a lot of paperwork through the ATF

  • @leemillar141 join the military you get it for free

  • @97goalkeeper not in the uk :(

  • @leemillar141 I would say "Hurricane810kr" is about right, but having worked in Class3 Weapons Sales, let me make some notes... RIFLE (all +$200 tax) Colt Military M4 - $1.5-5.5k Rock River Arms 14.5" "M4" - $3000 H&K HK416 10.4/14.5" - $7500-15,000 SUPPRESSOR Knights Armaments - $1.2k-$2k Gemtech - $800-1200 RAIL K.A. RIS - $400 SIGHT EOTech EXPS3 - $500 ($1k w magnifier) Aimpoint - $375-900 FOREGRIP GG&G - $50 SureFire M900 - $450-600 TRAINING **PRICELESS** GUNS =/= TOYS
  • @leemillar141 the US government gets their colt m4a1s for dirt cheap compared to what us civies get them for. I've "heard of " some Feds taking turns unloading whole mags on full auto to see how close they could get their groups. Burn through barrels in no time like this.

  • @leemillar141 Dont get it unless u like your gun to jam up over a spec of dust get a HK416 they run through mud, sand, water, and still shoot perfectly not jaming, cloging, or blowing up in your face. and they Rate of fire is really fast 900 rounds per minute!

  • @germanairsoft12 smuggle one in scotland for me and ill buy it :)

  • This is 5.56 you can tell because the casings are way to long for a .22 and the target is making alot of noise for a .22 so it is chambered in 5.56

  • There is so much venom here, why are people so defensive about whether or not this is 5.56 or 22lr? I have shot many different firearms and own several and to be honest it looked like 22LR but now I am leaning towards 5.56.

    The inability to hear the sonic crack of the round + reliable cycle of the action was what had me leaning towards 22LR, on top of low recoil. After pausing it on certain frames the brass does look like 5.56 though and the first round you can hear the crack.

  • ITS THE HALO GUY!!!!! SAYING UNLOAD!!!!!

  • I hear steel , not the crack of a round, believe me that can works just fine

  • You should have shot the range officer for telling you to unload.

  • @TurbodanNM "I don't know of any .22lr firearms that use a locking device."

    Maybe bolt actions, dumbass?

  • wow.....always wanted to hold/shoot one of those.......ur realy lucky though

  • the casings look small because they are flying away from the camera

  • UNLOAD!!

  • that is not .22LR. i have a .22LR conversion on one of my ARs and that recoil impulse is not .22LR. .22LR out of the AR platform is practically recoil-less. plus you don't see an adapter on that mag.

  • When the range officer says "UNLOAD...", the guy is all like "DAMMIT!"

  • why do u need earmuffs when the job of a surpressor is to be able to shoot the gun without hearing protection or did u buy that surpressor in China?

  • @pwnage696969 Wat. This is real life. A suppressor does not magically eliminate all sound from a gun. This is not Counterstrike, this is not Hollywood.

  • @awrawrwar in real life that's wat a surpressor does....and im 34 dont play games

  • @pwnage696969 Real life, silencers don't get rid of that supersonic crack from the rounds without subsonic ammo. That supersonic crack will damage your hearing.

  • if you think about it...an M4 or M16 is just a highpowered .22 anyways.

  • FAKE!!

  • i can't believe how retarded you guys are, he is firing .223 or 5.56 just from the size of the brass casings ejecting.

    now I own a TacSol .22 upper-but.

    how is this rifle .22lr? - you can just look at the feed lips on his GI steel mag. my mind is full of fuck

  • why does his plate carrier... have no plates in it? lol Used them overseas and that bad boy looked empty to me! HAHA

  • Please do not clutter this good man's video any further. If you want to have a rage war, please do it in PMs.

  • I don't know whether or not this particular rifle is actually 22 rimfire or not and I don't really care, however, it is possible to get a lot of recoil out of a 22 LR round when using a 22 LR adapter that has a floating chamber. Carbine Williams invented this back in the WWII for the military so that they could use 22 LR in training rifles and still have the normal recoil of the round it was replacing. Many 22 LR adapter kits use the floating chamber for the same reason.

  • @aaron54880 wow, what is a floating chamber anyway? The chamber is permanently attached to the end of the barrel on an AR, if it moved there would be a lot of trouble... I routinely shoot my dedicated 22 upper and there is virtually no recoil at all. When you make comments like this, you should realize that people who know what they are talking about know that you do not.

  • @beaker2000

    Try looking up the floating chamber on Wikipedia. I'm afraid that you're the one who knows nothing of firearms.

  • @aaron54880 Thanks but I don't need to look up anything on wikepedia like some people. 22LR has only so much impulse, a 22LR has little or no recoil, even on pistols, let alone rifles. Again, every time you quote wikipedia to show how much "knowledge" you have you look more ridiculous, quit now. I saw the movie too, Jimmy Stewart was great. The original point is that your original post is quoted directly from Wikipedia. Reading Wikipedia doesn't make you smart.

  • @beaker2000 So what you're saying is that you can't be persuaded by facts. Wikipedia is by no means the only source of information. I read an excellent article in Small Arms Review many years ago discussing the mechanism. The fact that you refuse to look up anything that proves your wrong only serves to demonstrate your complete ignorance, particularly regarding firearms. If you pulled your head out of your butt and read something on the device, you'd see how it creates more recoil.

  • @aaron54880 No I am saying that I can't be persuaded by people who have no idea what they are talking about and regurgitate things from Wikipedia to try and convince people they know what they are talking about. You are taking information out of context and passing it off as knowledge. Come back when you know what that means.

  • @beaker2000 All learning is effectively regurgitation. A person learns something and they repeat it. I'd never read the wikipedia article until i referenced it so that you could learn. I take an interest in fire arms and read many things. I stated earlier where i had originally read about the Floating Chamber device and its intended purpose for training. I'll repeat. I read the article in Small Arms Review. Ignorance is bliss, however, and you prefer to remain blissful.

  • @beaker2000 By the way, i've never seen the movie. My understanding is that it's not factually correct. You should love it.

  • @beaker2000 From Brownell's site

    The floating chamber was the invention of “Carbine” Williams, the same guy that designed the M1 Carbine. This system was also used in the old Colt Ace pistol and allowed the full-sized weapon to cycle with .22 ammo and give enough recoil to make it a useful training tool.

  • Continued.. It also allowed much more practice for the same amount of money and was quite popular with cost-conscious shooters and well as new shooters who had trouble managing the recoil of the full-blown .45 ACP round. This conversion concept is alive and well today with the Ciener conversions that we sell for the 1911, Browning High Power, Beretta, and others. 

  • @beaker2000 Floating chamber

    David Marshall Williams (a noted designer for the U.S. Ordnance Office and later Winchester) developed a mechanism to allow firearms designed for full-sized cartridges to fire .22 caliber rimfire ammunition reliably. His system used a small 'piston' that incorporates the chamber. When the cartridge is fired, the front of the piston is thrust back with the cartridge giving a significant push to the bolt.

  • Comment removed

  • Unloooaad

  • i didn't know a suppressed weapon sounded like that.........more like pjuh pjuh pjuh lol

  • UNLOAD

  • @lackalackalacka looks like an m4 to me. Looks like u need some glasses or education in weapons.

  • This video skips 0:11

  • Anyone else notice it was a .22LR, you can even see the .22LR adapter on the magazine

  • @LackaLackaLacka So explain to me how you get that much recoil, blowback, and noise from a suppressed .22lr - you are wrong on all levels.

  • @Hurricane810kr Its not a real suppressor, its not that much noise and theres hardly any recoil. I don't know of any .22lr firearms that use a locking device. They're all blowback. You can see the little casings in the air. Its pretty obvious that its using rimfire ammunition.

  • @TurbodanNM Not a real suppressor? How did you arrive at that conclusion Enrico Fermi? Have you ever shot a M4? Have you ever shot a suppressed M4? You, like the other guy, have no idea what you're talking about.

  • @Hurricane810kr Its a low quality video, but it sure looks like .22 casings ejecting.  Who gives a fuck anyway? You look like a real jackass getting all upset over a youtube video.

  • @TurbodanNM Thing is, you're wrong. There's no adapter. It's not .22 LR. Stop trying to enforce a non-fact and leave that to those who actually know their shit. Pause the video at exactly 0:09 and you will see there is no adapter. Have a nice day.

  • @KaosuKaiari I never said anything about an adaptor. How many sub-MOA rifles have you built, BTW?

  • @Hurricane810kr I'm going to agree with him because does not matter what it's shooting it's still an m4 and even a 22. is way louder than that and when you post a video of you shooting a m4 then feel free to rub it in my face but otherwise don't troll and hey great video I really want one of these!

  • @Hurricane810kr Yes there is a conversion on the mag. Yes that is a REAL shitty suppressor. Yes That is an AR-15. Yes that is a 22.LR rifle. Yes that much recoil is present because the but-stock wasn't in his shoulder properly. And YES 2.23/5.56 has little recoil to begin with. ( I guess I'm just used to .270 and 7.62.54R and 50. BMG)

  • @H3lld0g10 Go play some more COD because you have no idea what you're talking about.... Explain to me how this is a shitty suppressor as well. What 5.56 suppressors have you shot and been able to compare?

  • @Hurricane810kr i've used an M4 2000. great suppressor. Good video, good job dumping a mag, I'm done with this nerd battle.

  • @Hurricane810kr

    Lolumad?

  • @Hurricane810kr

    At this point there is really no sense in getting so angry, why not just point out why he is wrong in a calm, sophisticated manor, instead of calling him some angry cod player.

  • @higuything21 I've tried explaining this in a calm, sophisticated way in the past - and was still told otherwise. I've realized most of the comments come for COD players with little trigger time, though now and then someone with some real trigger time will post up. Every COD player seems to know more about firearms than those who use them for work and/or a hobby....

  • @higuything21

    Good point, I suppose you are in the right.

    It would make more sense the man that shot the firearm and has apparent knowledge of it (you) Would know more then the uninformed random youtuber.

    I am also on your side, and the shell casings look like .223 to me. .22 Also has much less recoil, whereas, .223 is about appropriate here.

  • @H3lld0g10 its a .223 look at the brass coming out of it, def not .22lr. and your all bullshit, big talk.

  • @H3lld0g10 and a .22 ar has absolutely no recoil, your just making stuff up.

  • @TurbodanNM 2 much games?

  • @TurbodanNM 5.56/.223 casings are pretty small...in fact you can see them landing on the ground in front/side of him. .22lr casings would be too small for the camera to see very well.

  • @TurbodanNM cant tell if trolling, or just plain stupid. look at the brass as it hits the ground, its 5.56mm or .233cal, pick your poison. I have shot many M4s, and a few with various suppressors. this video is legit, you have failed. that isn't the .22 mag adapter, that is a 30 round USGI mag. you are just jealous that he unleashed the beast on this range, as you can tell by the rounds hitting the steel with a satisfying PING. go back to your call of duty.

  • @TurbodanNM Epic Fail

  • @TurbodanNM Those actually look like 5.56 NATO, not .22lr

  • @LackaLackaLacka I thought the top of the mag looked like that, too, but I'm sure it's just a compression artifact. In fact, when I downloaded the clip with Real and looked at it frame by frame, the magazine looked totally normal. Besides, like Hurricane810kr said, there's no way a .22 LR would have that much recoil.

  • @LackaLackaLacka did you accidentally post that comment on the wrong video or are you just that dumb?

  • @LackaLackaLacka lolol@ retards

  • @LackaLackaLacka

    You're an idiot. There is no such thing as a ".22 long rifle adapter" for a standard USGI magazine seen in the video.

  • @LackaLackaLacka There is no such thing as .22 adapters for magazines so I'm not sure where you pulled that bit of knowledge from. There are conversion bolts, but you need special 22 magazines since a 223 round is huge compared to 22LR and you can't adapt the mags. He pulled a USGI mag out of the magwell. He was shooting .223. People who have absolutely no first hand knowledge of things shouldn't post about them like they do. Maybe you can get the unlock for .22LR magazine adapters on xbox.

  • @LackaLackaLacka

    Looks like an M4 to me, Looks like the right amount of recoil for an actual one too.

  • @LackaLackaLacka You are wrong, he was not shooting 22LR.