This is by far the best, most practical explanation of Open Theism. I don't see how anyone could watch this with an open mind and not get it. It's just common sense!
5:30...parameters is the issue. Open theists' parameters are wider than classical theists, so why not go wider? or why not narrower? the question is: where does the Bible set the parameters? the question is not "where do I think the parameters should be set?" both camps have their answers
This is by far the best, most practical explanation of Open Theism. I don't see how anyone could watch this with an open mind and not get it. It's just common sense!
WesleyPeacockChannel 1 year ago
5:30...parameters is the issue. Open theists' parameters are wider than classical theists, so why not go wider? or why not narrower? the question is: where does the Bible set the parameters? the question is not "where do I think the parameters should be set?" both camps have their answers
nomiddleofwhere 1 year ago
I'm pretty sure he said: "angelic beings" and not "jelly beans", but I wish he did say jellybeans...could that would have been pretty awesome.
rossman0605 1 year ago
Cameronversluis,
The problem of evil is being discussed here because in open theism there actually is no "problem" of evil.
victor77281488 1 year ago
Hahaha, I love the random mention of jellybeans at 6:00. LOL.
cameronversluis 2 years ago
Hahaha, it's funny how by this point open theism is just the background topic and now we're on to the problem of evil...
cameronversluis 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Cameronversluis,
The problem of evil is being discussed here because in open theism there actually is no "problem" of evil
victor77281488 1 year ago