Added: 1 year ago
From: noteviljustwrong
Views: 57,182
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (139)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • The creators of this video would have you believe that people can be put in little boxes based on their beliefs. I prefer to believe that each person is an infinitely complex intelligence which is capable of constantly re-examining their views of the world based on new evidence.

  • 1) Redford is a property owner and can sell off residential parcels.

    2) Redford can oppose development adjacent to his agricultural operation because such development puts constraints upon how he can run his vineyard.

    3) Redford, along with thousands of independent & corporate scientists working for increased energy efficiency and on alternatives to fossil fuels support the effort to ensure energy in a post-fossil fuel future.

    4) Airliners and military transports run on biofuel now.

  • Comment removed

  • Not sure why you are giving this short little communist any attention, all of the Hollywood Leftist are hypocrites. They view themselves as the elite...we, the little people must do as they say but they can do as they please which is common in a leftist dictatorship, which is their dream of the future USA.

  • @JasonMarano Redford is not short nor a communist, He is not an elitist and has a very humble background. You are talking a lot of trash. Also my friend, I fear a fascist regime much more than a socialist one at present.

  • you're an IDIOT..ROBERT REDFORD IS A WISE HONEST MAN WHO IS SPEAKING THE TRUTH..

  • I DONT BUY GAS FROM SHELL BECAUSE THEY KILLED KEN SARO WIWA

    I DONT BUY GAS FROM EXXON CAUSE THEY FUCKED UP THE COAST OF ALASKA AND STILL HAVENT PAID FOR IT

    I DONT BUY GAS FROM CHEVRON/TEXACO CAUSE THEY FUCKED UP THE ENVIRONMENT IN EQUADOR

    I DONT BUY GAS FROM BP/ARCO CAUSE THEY FUCKED UP THE GULF OF MEXICO

    YES I DO BUY GAS ON OCCASION BUT I DO MY VERY BEST NOT TO BUY FROM ANY OF THE FUCKS I LISTED ABOVE

    I IMAGINE THAT REDFORD IS MAKING SIMILAR CHOICES WHEN IT COMES TO ANY USE OF OIL

  • @TheGeorgeWHayduke "I IMAGINE THAT REDFORD IS MAKING SIMILAR CHOICES WHEN IT COMES TO ANY USE OF OIL "

    Really? Then you have quite an imagination. As I've stated, the guy has a lifestyle where he uses huge amounts of oil. He has a palatial estate in Utah. Think how much fuel it takes to heat that place. He flys in private jets. Think about the oil required. Robert Redford will never make any sacrifices himself. He's a hypocrite and a fraud & I dont' see how any sane person can deny that.

  • BULLSHIT - THERES NOTHING WRONG WITH DOING AN AIRLINE COMMERCIAL - WHAT WOULD BE WRONG IS OPPOSING THE DEVELOPMENT OF NEW FUELS AND TECHNOLOGIES FOR AIRPLANES WHICH BOB ISNT DOING - THERE ARE PEOPLE DEVELOPING SUCH FUELS - IM AGAINST BIG OIL BUT I STILL HAVE TO DRIVE MY CAR ON OCCASION - DOES THAT MAKE ME A HYPOCRITE - NO THAT MAKES ME A REALIST

  • @TheGeorgeWHaydukenew fuels,made from what? banana peels and twigs,fairy dust and magic mud.The amazing "NEW FUELS" that dont exist,never will and would have been invented many many decades ago if they ever could have been,those ones yeah?.You're against "BIG OIL".But you definitely use their products on a daily basis,unless you walk about on barefeet wearing only a sackcloth,do you? No i didnt think so.You dont have to drive your car either you choose to drive it.you are a libtard hypocrite..

  • @CAMERONisaEUROPHILE You are completely correct. George is an idiot. Robert Redford is a monsterous hypocrite and a major league fool. He has been invited to participate in debates on the enviroment many times and he always declines. He knows he will get killed in a debate with any knowledgeable person. So he declines. He doesn't debate with knowledge or reason, he preaches. I despise hypocrites and they don't come much bigger than Redford. What a AHole.

  • @TheGeorgeWHayduke Give me an example of some of the new fuels you are writing about. Just what types of fuels can be used for a 747? Give me an example. United Airlines planes fly on aviation fuel that is refined petroleum. Nothing else has the energy density for aircraft. You are in fact if you use ANY petroleum product. Is there any other type of oil company except big oil? Oil companies are not ma & pa operations and cannot be such. Were you born that stupid or did you have to train for it?

  • Biased.

  • Hypocrite or just a bit dumb? What, sell his lots and then tell the new owners he wants to ban the way to get there?

  • @TheFugleman He's both dumb and a hypocrite. He's also an intellectual coward of sorts. He's been invited to appear on both radio and TV shows to defend his views. He always declines. He will only go onto shows where people agree with him. He lives in a palacial estate in Utah, uses far more fossil fuels than the average person and rails about big oil. What a foolish man. The only thing this clown ever had going for him was a handsome face when he was a young man. Besides that he's a clown.

  • what a load off horse shit this statement is ..bob

  • Most everyone is some type of hypocrite. Such is duality of man. Get over yourself.

  • Nothing like taking things out of context and making grand conclusions.  zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

  • and again, if the government forced policies that limit the supply of course prices will rise. supply and demand dictates prices. OPEC reduces supply to keep prices high. Our government restricts exploration here which increases prices. as for the economy. democrats ran congress from '06-'10. how has that worked out? look at the official unemployment numbers from 2000- 2006 and then from 2006-2010 when dems ran congress and tell me who is to blame for high unemployment.

  • planes run on oil??? well, then we had better just forget about conservation. they oils companies - which have been making record profits - need to make MORE profits!

  • @cciemail record profits? reaaaaaalllly??? what exactly does that mean? nothing. that's what. if record profits mean. if they sold more oil because we are using more than they will make a larger profit amount this year than last. as a percentage, oil companies get a 9% return. apple gets a 25% return on investment. whould we demand apple lower it's prices? more compitition will mean less profit yet the government pushes policies that result in "energy prices necessarily skyrocketing" --Obama

  • @MVRWC

    record profits? okay, I realize this concept might be too much for your pea brain to handle, but I'll try to explain it to you, dumshit. Record profits means that their profits are higher than ever before. For the last 10 years, since the Rebublitards screwed the economy, and we've had unemployment around 10%, the oil companies have been making record profits each year. For example, ExxonMobile reporting that it beat its own record for the highest profits ever recorded by any company.

  • ...At the same time, the oil companies reap billions of dollars in government subsidies. A 2009 study showed that oil prices and profits were so high that eliminating the subsidies would decrease American output by less than half of one percent.

  • @cciemail as stated before. if you sell more product year after year your profits will break a record. let's see. if i sold one marble last year at a profit of 5 cents and two marbles this year for a profit of ten cents then I made a 'record profit' this year. 10 whole cents. as stated. if a company is growing and selling more product year after year due to higher demand then it should bea last years 'profits.' 10% unemployment has only been under Obama. get a clue.

  • @MVRWC

    Okay dumbshit, let me explain in real simple terms for you... When Bush invaded and occupied Iraq, that took that oil off the market. What happens when there's less supply? That answer, dumbshit, is that prices go up. And when prices go up, that means more profit for the oil companies. Now ask yourself, who would want that? The answer, dumbshit, is people who are heavily invested in the oil industry, like Bush I & II, Cheney, Wolfowitz, Rumsfeld,...

  • 10% unemployment started when Bush & the Republitard congress ruined the ecomonmy. When did the ecomnomy crash? 2008. Who was president then?? Doh!

  • cciemail - gosh the magical far left math of owebummer has nothing to do with the economic ruin of America huh? Sure good to see there are still some drunken monkey dims lying for obysmal out & about! How is that Wacky Baracky HopeNGrovel working for ya? Mad you did not get enough Obama money (our tax into your pick pocket)

  • @memama2

    Oh, Obama ruined the economy? Are you sure??? Nothing happened before Obama?

    Oh, wait, I seem to remember, there was a dumb Texan. That's right. George W. Bush drove this country off the cliff. Who was in power during the economic collapse of 2008?? That's the question you have to ask yourself, retard.

    It's funny you mention taxes. Most of you teabaggers got a tax break from Obama. But you're too stupid to realize that, aren't you? Do you believe there were dinosaurs 4000 years ago?

  • cciemail - Obama is a shape-shifting liar. Lied about his Birth Cert (2 internet fakes and counting) Lied during his whole last Scam-pain to troll for morons he can manipulate & get to vote for him (YOU) And now lies about "the green agenda" needing even more Trillions which has actually wasted a big wallet full of moolaa dumped on eco-con payola pals of Obysmal. And now lies every day, changing his lies by the hour. YET YOU LUV HIM LIKE BUTTER .....lol yer dumb huh?

  • @memama2

    oh my god! YOU'RE A BIRTHER???? ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,­ha,ha. You still believe Obama was born in Kenya? hehehehehehehe. I can't debate someone so stupid as you, but I just have to say you are one stupid-ass fucking retard. I didn't even know there were still dumbasses clinging to that birther thing. What a riot! hehehehehehehe. Goodbye, stupid moron. Don't bother replying, Shit-For-Brains. I won't read it.

  • cciemail  = No one knows where President Seven Iron was born. He has not allowed anyone to look at his fake paper certs. Out in the open. Not a "claim". But real paper/compurter/signature experts. And know one knew him at college? Or has looked at his old Passport records? So that makes YOU the moron in this equation. Pretending you know where Wacky Baracky was born? And not 1 fact to back you up *ting*

  • cciemail - I did not proof read "computer". If I do not correct that now? You will discuss that for days.

  • cciemail and "no" instead of know...I was laughing at your furious "obama is legit" post too much

  • cciemail = can you direct me to the Actual Factual BC of Obama site. Thanks.

  • Anyone who's jumped on this bandwagon didn't see through, or is a party to the tricks of McAleer, the Michael Moore of the right. Don't know what comes to mind for you with the words 'eco village', but the protest is actually due to developers exploiting the 'green' movement in an effort to get permission to develop land that would not usually be given permission. McAleer doesn't give a toss about eco sustainable living and is the last to support such ideals/way of life

  • Comment removed

  • There are not too many people on earth. There are just too many wicked people who want to live high while working to deny others the right to do the same. It is war and excessive greed that cause mass starvation. We've got so much extra food that we have to burn and bury it. America has already spent more money in it ridiculous s war on Libya than it would take to bring the extra food to poor people.

  • The rich liberal elite and their environmental flunkies believe there are too many people on earth. Prince Philip repeatedly says he wishes he could be reincarnated as a deadly virus which would kill over 90% of the people in the world. His wife is the head of the Church of England. How christian is that kind of thinking? Redford wants the poor to remain poor and the middle class to live like they are poor. Meanwhile he and his rich friends can party on in grand style. Sick people.

  • Boycott Hollyweird!

  • We are all hypocrites that live in our western base society. We are consumers of goods that destroy the environment, including the folks that posted this video. One can try to minimize one's Eco footprint and that is about it. The Eco homes mentioned? Good as they may be are still environmentally damaging. There are too many humans and all of us, yes all, even the most environmentally conscience hurt our environment. This post is meaningless in it's intent.

  • That doesn't sound like RR advertising United, "It's time to fly."

  • Ann McElhinney is paid by and works for neocons and big oil. She's a conartist.

  • @wizardwarriordrone Prove it moonbat...

    We know LIBERAL MOONBATS live to lie since the facts ALWAYS undercut their stance regardless of what it is...

  • @russ1951 who's "we" ... you have a RAT in your pocket ... I don't care if that paid SHILL, Ann McElhinny, writes garbage like the PAID whore that she is ... we have settled on what she is so what's her price? ... cause she's not shilling for free ... she's a whore ...

    If the canyon that RR is developing has suitable water and land they'll allow it in UTAH ... if it doesn't they won't because UTAH is a NEOCON state and they hate RR ... his development would have been gone over thoroughly by PW

  • @wizardwarriordrone

    Why is it that your ilk always insults anybody that has a difference of opinion from yours? Why is anybody that has a difference of opinion from you is "obviously" a paid shill? Why is that the fucking leftist naive bleeding heart morons (that are killing us with political correctness) use the word "shill" ALL the time?

    You are just a drone, just like your channel name. Could not be more fitting.

  • Wow. He is fugly. Looks worse than Don Imus.

  • As always, an excellent presentation.

    I suppose that the ultimate question is "What can we do to make life better?" As for Robert, he could learn to question himself and learn to express himself better.

  • As the author, Michael Crichton, once stated - paraphrasing, mixing Science with Politics is a dangerous combination - he was correct. Funny how none of the so-called settled science never includes the Sun's impact on the Earth - warming and cooling. I support many different forms of alternative energy - I replaced all of the light-bulbs in my house with green bulbs - not because of the environment, but because of holding down replacement costs. It's about economics - get a grip!

  • Ironically, the helicopter you used in this film also runs on oil....Beware the speck in another's eye when you should be looking to remove the log in your own.

  • @cottonbrad They must have chartered a helicopter to get that footage. I doubt that stock aerial footage of one of the world's most famous ski resorts exists anywhere on the internet. Spending $500-$1000 for a few seconds of video that will be posted to Youtube and will never generate any income makes great financial sense.

    "Big Oil" is paying me large to be their shill. I'm not here being sarcastic for my own amusement.

  • So Robert Redford is a hypocrite, apparently.

    Does this in anyway prove the case that man-made climate change is a fallacy or contribute to the debate in any meaningful way?

    Obviously not.

    Is everyone who takes into account scientific consenus on the subject somehow implicitly tied to Robert Redford and other possible hypocrites?

    Of course not.

    Are the makers of this video just looking for attention?

    It would seem so.

  • Global warming, loss of Polar Bear Habitat, less oil, less natural gas.....a fleecing of Americans and a way to buy votes with entitlement programs....Give us a break!

  • Global warming...lost polar bear Habitat....oil shortage....natural gas shortage...more ways to fleece you and tax you so they can buy votes with entitlement programs!

  • A millionare Hollywood liberal is a hypocrite? Stop the presses!

  • Global warming IS and ALWAYS will be a farce ... when we breath we expel carbon dioxide so why don't we ALL stop Breathing...

    where on EARTH is it being done it correctly?...

    Why don't you GO SOMEWHERE and create it AND leave US alone and stop ALL the LIES

  • @ratsnacage1 Not really I just said you where ranting and you have the freedom to do so. :) freedom of speech as you have said

  • @ratsnacage1 Ok again with the ranting then??

  • @ratsnacage1 So your stating you know better then the people who don't agree with RR lol. Man you must be damn naive because all your doing is shooting off hateful remark's yourself. So please stop ranting about ignorance and hateful because you seem to be both of those MR.Hypocrite :)

  • @ratsnacage1 Ok thanks for trolling :) or is it happy trolling :( lol

  • At 1:14 you say he's fighting to ban oil. What do you mean? That doesn't make any sense. Oil exists. Is he fighting to rid the world of all oil? You need to clarify.

  • Every human is a problem for the rest of the ecosystem. Less people on the planet is the solution to all problems. One-and-two-child families would shrink the total population while increasing the wealth and opportunities for all. That's my view on it. We all want better lives and more. If we don't change we will find ourselves in war over problems and resources. Less people is the solution.

  • Redford looks like a zombie aka "The Living Dead".

  • Liberals are hypocrites by nature. They want to take the money you work hard for and give it to people that won't work but don't take theirs. They hate oil more than electricity but we use oil and fossil fuel to make electricity. The electric or battery powered car is more damaging to the enviorment than a gas powered car.

  • This is actually kind of mean. You can't really expect someone like Robert Redford to connect jet fuel to oil.

  • Really grasping at straws here. sorry this is really too ignorant to even drop in to comment on.

  • @L8nitedave - So basically, you watched this and posted to say it was not worth watching or posting about.

    OK, if it makes sense to you.......

  • @KararotGoku Riiiiiight, or maybe nothing about it made sense at all.

  • @L8nitedave - But yet you keep commenting and commenting about how this is not worth commenting about.

    snicker.....

  • @KararotGoku The content of the video isn't.

  • @L8nitedave but you have fun, k

  • Like this is a big surprise? Al Gore does the same crap. It's only us "little" people who have to live like we are in the stone age. Gimme a break.

  • Oh sorry, don't you guys get it?

    Bob wants YOU to make big sacrifices - not him.

    Only the little people have to downgrade their lifestyle.

  • This isn't about "the far left" conspiracy folks. It's about a rich person once again trying to get over on the underclass. Why can't you far right nutjobs just be honest for once? Gotta keep that propaganda machine screamin', huh?

  • @Frostweld  But he is a far leftist. You're in denial.

  • Another Hollywood eco nutjob more concerned about how it will all effect his own habitat than any enviromental issue. Once again evidence is presented of the far left ideological commitment to cripple economies, development and restrict freedom.

  • Yes, all liberal/progressives are disgusting hypocrites. And the liberal elites like Redford are the worst. Their ultimate wish is to destroy the middle class, and turn back our lifestyle a hundred years. Of course they as the wealthy and ruling elite will give up nothing, but will gladly sacrifice some of their time to lord over us "the un-washed masses" when the day comes. Boycott this type of hollywood garbage.

  • This is like Obama promoting electric cars and getting off oil and into expensive wind and solar while flying around the Country in using millions of gallons of fuel and leaving a huge carbon foot print.

  • @quizerry see heres where your wrong, im a liberal & i have 7 cars, 3 pick ups, a motorhome & 2 harley's, & im going to burn as much gas as i can before i die, i dont believe that global warming is as bad as they say, so dont lump all libs into one basket, when it comes to conservation im just like u conservatards, use as much as i can because when the shit hits the fan i'll be dead & i have no kids, so i dont give a rats ass.....

  • Why pick only on Redford. ALL liberal/progressives are hypocrites. Unless you see your liberal/progressive friend walking to work and living in a mud hut with no running water and electricity, then your friend is a hypocrite.

    Liberals, start walking the walk, give up the civilized world and return to the dark ages you so wish on the rest of us.

  • Liberal Hypocrite Robert Redford Inc. is too big to fail, shhhhhh !

  • Did I miss the part of this video where RR promotes environmentalism?

  • Meet the future: Global warming.

    except it's here already.

  • @harponercam -- Good, we must have more warming becasue it"s freakin' freezing everywhere... so I don't think it has yet to arrive. Maybe next week.

  • Obama and his buddies are all for "Healthcare" yet all the Unions that were screaming for it are getting "waivers" so guess what? THEY DON'T HAVE TO ABIDE BY IT. Once again, rules for us and not for them. whoopie

  • @dbstooge

    Nice comment. He is of the large contingent of Limosine Liberals like Pelosi,Reid, Obama his wife BOTH Clintons etc. They are all also for "gun control". But none of them are giving up their cushy planes, SUV's and Secret Svc guards armed to the teeth to protect them, are they? NO. They are all of the "Royal WE" which means "Rules for THEE and not for ME". "buy an electric car" do they drive them? NO, Because it restricts travel, and thats what they want, YOU TO HAVE RESTRICTIONS

  • I think pointing out the hypocrites in Hollywood does a great bit of good. some years ago, Tom Cruise was railing about "wasting fossil fuels" and really getting on his high horse. One of the reporters said "say, your latest movie Days of Thunder used race cars, going around and around in a circle for months, how much gas did they use"? Have not heard much from Tom about that lately. :) Throw it back in their faces. Like B.Streisand and her 7 houses ALL w/Air Cond. on set at 68 degreesBS indeeed

  • Some enterprising young film maker needs to do a documentary n the carbon footprint that a movie or television show production produces.

    The carbon that distributing films to theaters, and running of theaters produce.

    The carbon that the candy and other munchie manufacturing and distribution to theaters produces.

    The carbon that DVD and television production, distribution and retailing produces.

  • Showing the blatant hypocrisy of our nation's entertainers won't do much, because they don't care. They seem themselves as royalty who are exempt from the rules that apply only to little people.

    But put a dent in their business, their industry, their livelihood, and you'll see them shut their collective yaps real fast.

  • After all, after over a century of entertainment production, isn't there enough existing entertainment to please everyone for the rest of their lives?

    Is entertainment really all that important if it produces so much carbon? Can't we just make due with the entertainment we already have?

    All Hollywood is doing anyway is producing remakes, so it's not like we'd notice the difference if they stopped production to save the planet.

  • @jjrakman

    AhHa! I am a writer and I have an ORIGINAL SCREENPLAY that comes with it's own hit song called

    That's Where the Money Is. There are some original thoughts left. thanks.

  • MASTERSTROKE!!!

    I LOVE the Mozart!

  • R.I.P. Newman...

  • Comment removed

  • Maybe he could build John Travolta an air strip between those $2 million lots so he could land and park one of his FIVE jets beside his house. ECO-HYPOCRITES.

  • And who is surprised by the libturds who are hypocrites? LOL that is what they are. always have been. As Arriana Huffington said about using a private jet: "Its going that way anyway!! " LOL

  • @uzimodem

    Yea, Hannity said to R.F.K Jr. after he railed against "fossil fuel" etc. He said "Hey Robert, did you drive an electric car to this studio'? uh, NO, an SUV. Hannity "when you leave here, where are you going'? uh to Aruba. Hannity, fine, how are you going to get there? RFK uh, private jet. So, it is game, set and match for Hannity and zero Love for the "Royal WE" crowd.

  • @btwall60 :so very true. they are hypocrites. they want everyone to change but them. I could care less what celebrites think and liberals.

  • Oh he opposed the improvement of a hwy 189 for years. Keeping it "charming!" While people died on this road, he was all against letting people do their job, and improve it. Now, he is adding to the traffic? What gives you P O S Robert R?

  • I bet he likes to smell his own farts.

  • What is the background music?

    Absolutely sublime.

    P.S.

    Redford is a hypocrite, who should drown in the urine of the wildlife animals he destroys.

  • What's the difference between and Environmentalist and a Developer?

    > A Developer wants to build a house in the woods.

    > An Environmentalist OWNS a house in the woods.

  • I suppose he got the idea from Teddy Kennedy who opposed wind power when it was in his view from his estate. Or perhaps he only wants Al Gore sized California mansions near his home in Napa Valley. My guess is he will smugly drive a prius to the airport before boarding a private jet to Colorado...

  • We all have our views on rights to this earth. But I for one have never subscribed to the view that the rich were more entitled to it than the rest. The rich opinion is no more important than the rest of us and probably no more unbiased than the rest of us so should be treated with the same level of investigation and skepticism, in my opinion, which I admit is that of a nobody.But...I am woman and I am powerful, to quote another of these tinsel types. Someday we nobodies will have our day.

  • Favorite Robert Redford joke amongst local Sundance, Utah residents:

    Q: What is the difference between a developer and an environmentalist?

    A: A developer wants to rape nature to build a ski resort. An environmentalist already has.

    Bada Bing!

  • A leftist who is not a hypocrite just doesn't have enough money and actually has to walk the walk.

  • We've had a long running Love/Hate relationship with Redford here in Utah. On the one hand, he has done amazing things for our state and people, and on the other he's the biggest two timing, hypocritical, fork tongued devil known amongst our "elite" citizenry. I'm sure it's akin to the relationship Massachusetts has with the Kennedy's. Their politics don't match their actions.

  • We'll be known by our "fruits". No double entendre intended.

  • wow they really want us in the compact cities

  • Par for the course out of Hollyweird.

  • Ummm--just how is he any different from the "NIMBY"-types all over the country who are opposed to development, except when they are for it? I mean, it's not like anyone would be so gullible as to believe all the stuff he says...or, uh. oh. my bad. 'scuse me!

  • Comment removed

  • Nice - "high density" housing that minimizes the footprint on the land is bad but rich people sprawling out over tens of acres each and fragmenting wildlife habitat "preserves" rural lands. If we all sprawled out like Redford there would be no more open spaces and wilderness left. 

  • It might minimize the footprint but it maximizes the environmental impact. When you have 12 people per acre, you're going to create more waste than the land can support. Furthermore, high-density housing does more to fragment and interrupt wildlife habitat than low density housing sprawling over tens of acres. Those sprawling acres are there mostly as a buffer between neighbors and are left in as natural a state as possible.

    I'm sure it irks you that rich people are environmentalists too.

  • @kmsgamma Well not everyone wants to live in a house, I myself really like to live in an apartment in a high rise building. I dont know I just like it.

  • @kmsgamma Utah despises liberals and RR ... they would not allow him to develop any land if it weren't in THEIR best interest ... Redford is developing his own private property not "wilderness" ... there is a difference ... but that doesn't play into your hypocrite drama ... now does it? ... what a joke you are ...

  • @kmsgamma Obviously you know little of ski area development, as Redford is doing it right. the area needs some development to make it financially viable. He could build mega condos and have more people there with all the human waste that implies and water use as well, instead he is opting for fewer abodes and less eco impact. Good for Bob! He practices what he preaches, you're looking at the whole enchilada in the wrong way.

  • Typical Hollywood liberal .....do as they say .....not as they do.

  • I'd like to see the plans for this "eco village". The developer's website doesn't have much to say about it except that it plans "275 housing units and a 105-unit retirement/assisted living center on 30.1 acres of new development". I mean it's awfully coy to call that an "eco village" when it's actually high-density housing. Of course this isn't covered in this short film.

    Like it or not, large, expensive homes do more to preserve "the rural heritage" of an area than high-density housing does.

  • @diiyo Classic elitist response

  • @diiyo So, with income redistribution, we, the minions would also be eco conscious and have 100 acre pads? The elite conservationists can have it all and put the screws to us. Tell us how to live, walk instead of drive, what to eat, which health care to have, what vehicles to drive (if we must drive) etc?

    I believe that they are hyprocrits and when they talk of income redistribution, it's not THEIR income that they want to redistribute!

  • @mcknzia: I think you're a little confused. Rich conservationists act to preserve the environment because it's a thing of beauty and essential to a life worth living on earth. Unlike you minion conservationists though, they don't tell you how you should live your lives. They put their own money where their mouths are and actually preserve the environment. You people on the other hand, picket yourselves hoarse trying to force others to create a utopia where you can live without being productive.

  • You mean 'Rich environmentalists' like Prince Charles who travels around around the world on a 200-foot yacht preaching a 'Low-Carbon Lifestyle' to Third World peasants who already spend 50% of their meager incomes on food, the other 50% on energy, and are being asked to forego plentiful, reliable coal-powered electricity desperately needed by their families NOW......to massage the ego of self-centered environmentalist ideologues who fantasize about unaffordable solar panels and windmills ?

  • You mean 'Rich environmentalists' like Prince Charles who travels around around the world on a 200-foot yacht preaching a 'Low-Carbon Lifestyle' to Third World peasants who already spend 50% of their meager incomes on food, the other 50% on energy, and are being asked to forego plentiful, reliable coal-powered electricity desperately needed by their families NOW......to massage the ego of self-centered environmentalist ideologues who fantasize about unaffordable solar panels and windmills ?

  • @locostatom I could`nt have said it, any better.

  • awesome

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more