Added: 2 years ago
From: MarkRosengarten
Views: 6,666
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (19)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • LOVE YOU!

  • Your explanation is absolutely fantastic do you mind if I inbox you some questions? You seem to know your stuff!

  • Great explanation, thanks

  • some normality and equivalent examples pls

  • thx

  • you are the man

  • I loved the way you explained. Thanks sir. :)

  • Why did you give calcium a charge on one side but not the other?

  • @angrywinds The calcium with a +2 charge is bonded to a spectator ion. The spectator ion is not written in the ionic reaction, it is just assumed. On the other side, Ca has no charge. This is because it is not bonded to anything, so it has an equal number of protons and electrons.

  • @boysntoysreview ah I see, thanks man.

  • @jacsoccer7 Whoops! I was signed in under my other incarnation. You're very welcome. :)

  • in the equation 1:51 why did you have two nickels with the sulfate, considering nickel has a charge of +2 and sulfate has a charge of -2, so you don't require subscripts to balance.....

  • @jacsoccer7 Because nickel has two different oxidation states, +2 and +3.  For this example, I used the +3 (nickel (III)) ion.

  • thanks it really helps me! ^^

  • i hope you realize that by posting videos online, you're not only helping students in a class of 30 kids, you've helped/taught the 2,218 students who watched your video!

    thanks for posting this series, its really useful for ap chem

  • thank you!

  • Thank you it helped allot

  • thanks :D

  • Thanks, this helped me out a lot!

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more