Added: 4 years ago
From: JoanScutter
Views: 71,116
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (20)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • NO!! we have a doggy down!

  • I can tell this is real, I mean really, If this was all a hoax, why would Dr.Reed kill his dog just for a "prank", only a crazy person would do that. My qestion is this, Did the alien use any type of device to do this to the dog? such as the wrist bracelet, or with his hands?

  • I'm guessin' the dog didn't make it!

  • Not according to Reeds testimony. The alien did not see him until after the dog was destroyed. If you remember, his dog was in it's " death throes" when he broke through the thicket. The dog was no longer on the attack, he was crying for his life and was already in intense pain, according to what Reed was describing.

  • @rpmrpms: I think I know this case better than ANYONE...and I am sorry...but you are flat wrong. I don't know where you think you obtained your timeline of events...but it is inaccurate. The creature did not kill the dog until AFTER he came up on in through the brush.

  • @JoanScutter I seem to have missed something. Been jumping from one video to another re this incident but I guess what I wanna know is what happened to the creature? Pls enlighten me on this one.

  • @valleyofneptune: I explain that in the video description of the :Full House Footage', however, I will copy that explanation here for easy reference:

    Some have asked what happened to the creature. Rutter says that he believed it escaped of its own accord. The freezer he had been keeping it in wasn't locked, so it could have easily left any time that it wanted to. So apparently that is what it did.

  • @JoanScutter Very much appreciated. This is a very compelling & interesting case, however, I remain a bit skeptical. Better to be a skeptic coz it makes me ask questions. Well, am not gonna be posing one, except to say that the explanation of how the creature got away seems more of an anticlimactic to this case, if not a more acceptable cover-up to keep agencies off track. Assuming this is true, I wish Dr. Reed all the best & hope to hear, read or see something new re this case soon. Thanks.

  • If the alien did this to his dog, why didn't it do it to him? It had plenty of chances?

  • @rpmrpms: Of course it is impossible to say for sure, but I have speculated that the creature killed the dog only because it saw Rutter (aka Dr Reed) approaching with the tree branch and it needed to free itself from the dog in order to defend itself. The only way to do that quickly was to kill the dog.

  • If I find an alien and dies I will make sure all the youtube people will see the alien and if the alien is a boy or girl too. We have the right to know these things. I will call the next door army base too.

  • I cant hear any audio?

  • @MrWishco There is no audio. These are just frame-grab still frames I took from the original video footage so that you could see the white-powdered remains of his dog.

  • My question what happened to the craft ? surely something that big, and that important should have been taken for study by qualified scientists, or is it that our so called government knows already more then its telling ? things are starting to come to light as we speack more and more people are coming forward to tell the truth and the amount of filmed Ufo's is more and more clear , whatever is happening I pray that these thing's come with good intentions other wise we should be cautious .

  • i noticed alot of the people who claimed this was a hoax only judged the photos like how reed made the red eye and stuff and people never really observed the film itself. so much crazy shit over this...

  • You are correct, they do not like to even mention the video. They pretend it doesn't even exist. Well guess what...it does. So I tell them either debunk the video or shut up. They haven't yet - and it's been (10) years. So what does that tell you?

  • I wonder why "Dr Reed's" ex-girlfriend claims that he never had a dog but instead was allergic to animals ^^

  • There are undoubtedly a number of details about this case that raise questions. You could argue about those details all day long and you still wouldn't be able to explain the "Creature Blinking" video. Or perhaps you have an explanation for that? I have provided video and photographic evidence that are consistent with what Rutter claimed happened. Was it "his" dog? Was it his mother's dog? I don't know - but the evidence supports the fact that he was with SOME dog and that dog's name was Suzy.

  • Regarding him being allergic to animals: Pure bunk. I have seen several pictures of him with animals - including a couple of him when he was younger playing with his childhood dog. I don't know if Barb was making that up or if that is what she was told at some point by Rutter. But either way, it is simply not true.

  • @Godsim Payed by goverment. Just a possibility

  • does anyone know if the english version is available yet ?

  • The English version of what?

  • And Whut Exactly Did The Alien Do To The Dog?

  • Read the description of this video. It describes what happened.

  • aparently he encroauched on the situtaion as the dog latched onto the alien by the armthe alien clawed it too peices pulling it apart then he bashed it in a moment of rage over whitnessing the midget make a meal of his beloved family pet. the midget got owned , ray gun too far away....

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more