omg...this is the SLLLOOOOOOWWWWWWWEEESSSSTTTTTT rendition of this movement i've ever heard. sorry, but this doesn't work for me...too static and it falls apart when played this slow.
I somewhat rescind my previous comment. I just thought it was interesting that composers had never before tried to capture the feeling of confusion, or frustration, in music; and also that, in doing so, all the possible emotions to be expressed seemed to be taken. But maybe it's just the depth that changes? Confusion may have been previously expressed by one of Bach's slow dirges; and Beethoven expressed rage, but as well as 90s rock? Just musing on how music changes as people change.
...this is the Mr.Hyde side of Gould whereby he willfully does the "wrong thing"...i.e. sounds all wrong for this kind of Prokofiev...yet if he recorded the lot...of these "Visions"...maybe I would buy them...just to be able to listen at will to Prokofiev "done wrong"...the Gould's way...
Absolutely not. However, each composer has stylistic features - it's not a news - and a task of the performer is to introduce those features to the audience, mostly non professional musicians. Prokofiev was very active person with highest degree of sarcastic humor. His music is extremely contrasting, but without funerals. The drama comes to his music much later than Visions were composed.
However, what if the musical and pianistic genius Gould 'felt' the drama Prokofiev wasn't even aware of yet ?
Stylistically one can call it 'wrong', but what if Gould felt or understood certain things the composer himself didn't yet ? In that case, you can say the performer has no right to put his own 'personality' into someone else's music, but can this really be avoided ?
I have nothing againts Gould. Like probably most professional pianists, I treat him with a great respect. We may only guess what he predicted. As we know, he had his own interpretation to all composers and did not like Chopin much -:) Prokofiev's piano music is one of my expertise. Therefore, I am absolutely confident saying that the Sarcasms (Prokofiev was 22 y.o.) and Visions (24 y.o.) can not be performed in such long story as Gould introduces. That story came much later to P.
All of us put our personality into the music that we perform. Otherwise, what we are doing in arts, right? -:) I am just saying my opinion about only one fragment. Other people liked Gould's Visions and I did not. Both sides are right, I believe.
@tsiyishin - ignore your tutor. Play it however you like it, in your free time if you must, without anyone else hearing. Your tutor's opinion (while possibly valid) is not important. Gould -really- broke the rules with this one - but listen to how unique and beautiful his interpretation is.
I think this is the first time I've heard Gould play Prokofiev (I know there's a recording of the 7th sonata). The tempo is slow but I think it works well. He should have made a recording of the whole opus 22.
Amazing. The slow tempo bothered me at first, but I now consider this the ultimate version of the piece. I'd really like to hear how he interpreted the rest of the visions.
I will. I have enormous respect for the composer but to suppress criticism is the type of regime that Prokoffieff would have hated as he lived under it. If I say I don't like something what is the problem? Free speech remember. A better response would have been to say why YOU like the piece.
@elvaril Truly awful piece. Love the piano concertos - if this is a representation of the angst of modernism blah blah blah ... what utter nonsense! Prokofiev must have been having his piano tuned the day he wrote this!
Ok i agree with you about "prokovief's tuned piano" but after reading Doistoievki book something about Russian spirit appears: it' isnt angst of modernism but a private moment between god and a man that gave so much of its blood to people. Here's the tragical fugitiv vision of what human beeing is really made... clumsiness and fear
Dissonance, confusion-- one of the last colors of nature emulated by musicians.
And what now? What's new after it's all been done before? ...I'm sure this was the concern of Modernism. I guess the response was that the medium changed--music serves entirely different purposes these days. Commercialism, I guess.
Dissonance yes, confusion no. The artists stepping into new light have exact ideas what kind of voice they want to generate. Confused are the audiences, when they can't catch up with the new creativity. Most of us like like old dogs, unable to learn new tricks. The only way to be less confused, is to give up stubbornness and embrace newness.
@Yoshi5020 Multitonality, to me, is the addition of another dimension to music rather than the destruction of one. There is so much in our modern world to describe; transcendence, integration, horror.
Just watching some different performances of this- very nice, as usual- I always wonder with these vids of Gould if those frozen moments are due to editing/splicing? I presume they are.
Mekong Delta (a german techno-thrash band) are very influenced by Prokofiev, along with M. Mussorgsky and other romanticist composer. One of their records is even named Visions Fugitives.
Funny you should mention that. I think that Prokofiev's Toccata op.11 is heavier than most metal bands I've heard to date, and it was composed almost a century ago.
Certainly interesting to find the roots of heavy metal in the great composers of yesteryear.
I'd like you to find one heavy metal band that cites Prokofiev as inspiration.
I think you are confusing your own experience with others.
When I listen to Beethoven, Bach, Ives, Metallica I am listening through my own experience and find similarities within the music not of the music itself but my own experience.
Finding comparisons based off of experiences is one way to find similarities within the music, but I must disagree that there is no comparison between the two outside the realm of emotion. Based off the simple fact that there exists a major and minor system of scales for both classical music and heavy metal, then I feel it is safe to make the assumption that there are similarities between the two.
Not to mention the fact that classical music inspired ragtime, which inspired jazz, which inspired blues, which inspired rock n roll, which inspired classic rock, which inspired metal.
While I do not know if Necrophagist specifically said that Prokofiev was an influence on their music, I do know that they took a theme from Prokofiev's Romeo and Juliet as a segment for one of their metal riffs to conclude one of their songs. That to me is inspiration enough.
Actually, all the styles you mentioned are part of popular music—not classical music.
Japanese imperial music and Lady Gaga are both sonically based (as in language)—of course there are similarities. That however does not give merit to your claim.
I'm not saying they shouldn't mix—I mix things all the time in terms of music.
However, using a theme of Prokovief I guess amounts to inspiration.
You must not listen to much metal. The harmonic minor tendencies are obviously taken from classical music exclusively. Necrophagist, although very disjointed in comparison, is undeniably influenced by classical music not only with their harmonic minor progressions but also the raised 4ths. If you listen to real technical innovative metal rather than bluesy or w/e you will find classical influence.
Ah yes the incomparable Glen Gould. We miss you Glen, this world is a sadder place without you. Things are pretty bad here in douchebag central. You would faint at the sight of what is called "Talent" these days. Much love to you.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
"You can feel the soul of the music,"? What are you talking about? The music doesn't have a soul---WE do; the composer does. Music is only the numerical vehicle. The Ghost in the Machine?----i don't think so. No.
Well then what was the the person who made the comment about feeling the soul of the music talking about then? She (he?) said "you can feel the very soul of the music. If there is no soul, then what is referring to exactly. Tell us. Show these fuckwit's your grand wisdom.
My Grandfather owned a tailor shop in Toronto. Glenn wanted a suit and nearly didn't get one, for my grandad was not tolerant of anyone who appeared to be- light in the loafers, shall we say. It took my uncle to point out that GG was one of Canada's most famous musicians. Gramps relented,
Glenn got his tux and remained a loyal customer after that. This was back in the early 1960's
To leptosz: one approach to appreciate any piece of music. Listen to a bit, hit pause and try to imagine what sounds would come next. Hit play again and see where the composer went instead. Go with the composer to this new place that you would not have expected.
@fredericfranc Re serial composers and trying to imagine what comes next. IMO serial composition is not simply a mechanical process. The composer still needs to compose: chose the register, rythmn, dynamics, juxtaposition of competing and counterpoint lines, instrumentation. They use their ears, imagination and musical sensibility. If not, we could study baroque technique and all sound like Bach.
@highlandsh ...still, would be very hard for the listener of a serial composition to put into practice what you are proposing...because they would be obligated to follow the tone row strictures that the composer who is following this practice is himself obligated to follow...for the listener, it is damn hard to do, unless they have assimilated the row beforehand...and how realistic is that?..
@fredericfranc I suppose a skilled listener could actually hear the sequence of a row but then, how many listeners to Beethoven hear the modulations and functional harmonies? You could miss the forest for the trees. Serial is a means to an end, there must still be music as a result of the system and that is what you want to hear, whether it is Cage, Ravel, Nancarrow or Orlando di Lasso.
@gbeachy2010 I understand your:"...there must still be music as a result of the system..." but my comment is to Mr. highlandsh's: "..listen...hit a pause...try to imagine what comes next..." proposition. Try doing THAT in the case of a real stiff serial composition like Schoenberg's "Moses and Aaron"...if you can hear that kind of singing AHEAD of the composer to any effect, well, you are pretty freaking good...
Visions Fugitives...
He was Vision Fugitive, he performed from the very core of his being... This is how silence sounds like, in musical translation...
Arpeggio555 1 month ago
awestruck, speechless.
CaptainBluebear08 2 months ago
This is very intense music making!
Very interesting.
Geert Dehoux, pianist.
geertdehoux 3 months ago
omg...this is the SLLLOOOOOOWWWWWWWEEESSSSTTTTTT rendition of this movement i've ever heard. sorry, but this doesn't work for me...too static and it falls apart when played this slow.
lflagr 5 months ago
I somewhat rescind my previous comment. I just thought it was interesting that composers had never before tried to capture the feeling of confusion, or frustration, in music; and also that, in doing so, all the possible emotions to be expressed seemed to be taken. But maybe it's just the depth that changes? Confusion may have been previously expressed by one of Bach's slow dirges; and Beethoven expressed rage, but as well as 90s rock? Just musing on how music changes as people change.
Yoshi5020 5 months ago
Completely different from Richter, and eye-openingly original. I never would have thought to play it this way.
corkasus 5 months ago
...this is the Mr.Hyde side of Gould whereby he willfully does the "wrong thing"...i.e. sounds all wrong for this kind of Prokofiev...yet if he recorded the lot...of these "Visions"...maybe I would buy them...just to be able to listen at will to Prokofiev "done wrong"...the Gould's way...
fredericfranc 9 months ago
I saw the message: ENJOY THE VISION FUGITIVE! (THE MOMENTFUL LIFE)
Rusalka1975 11 months ago
Glenn Gould is the greatest pianists ever next to Horowitz, Arthur Rubinstein, and Arrau. They all share the greatest history in the art of piano!
ThePianoguy89 11 months ago
Comment removed
ThePianoguy89 11 months ago
Perfect !! really i like it a lot
richardre06 1 year ago
It's not what Prokofiev wrote. Too slow and too dramatic...
piano62lyu 1 year ago
@piano62lyu
But it kicks fuckin ass this way. Some cross between Ravel's Le Gibet, late Scriabin, and of course Prokofiev.
aculturemind 1 year ago
@piano62lyu
Should a performer always follow the composer's own musical intentions ?
Only a question...
geertdehoux 9 months ago
@geertdehoux
Absolutely not. However, each composer has stylistic features - it's not a news - and a task of the performer is to introduce those features to the audience, mostly non professional musicians. Prokofiev was very active person with highest degree of sarcastic humor. His music is extremely contrasting, but without funerals. The drama comes to his music much later than Visions were composed.
piano62lyu 9 months ago
@piano62lyu
Thanks for your interesting answer.
However, what if the musical and pianistic genius Gould 'felt' the drama Prokofiev wasn't even aware of yet ?
Stylistically one can call it 'wrong', but what if Gould felt or understood certain things the composer himself didn't yet ? In that case, you can say the performer has no right to put his own 'personality' into someone else's music, but can this really be avoided ?
I doubt so.
A cordial greeting.
Geert Dehoux, pianist.
geertdehoux 9 months ago
@geertdehoux
I have nothing againts Gould. Like probably most professional pianists, I treat him with a great respect. We may only guess what he predicted. As we know, he had his own interpretation to all composers and did not like Chopin much -:) Prokofiev's piano music is one of my expertise. Therefore, I am absolutely confident saying that the Sarcasms (Prokofiev was 22 y.o.) and Visions (24 y.o.) can not be performed in such long story as Gould introduces. That story came much later to P.
piano62lyu 9 months ago
@piano62lyu
Historically, you might be 100% right.
But, let's not forget Gould was a genius, as well.
What IF he had played for example Mozart's Fantasy in d Minor like this ?
Would that have been 'wrong' ?
Stylistically, no doubt!
But then again, Gould was a weird musician and extremely intelligent...
Of course, I'm aware of the fact this interpretation doesn't belong to the 'tradition' of performing Prokofiev's music.
Nevertheless, it remains very interesting.
geertdehoux 9 months ago
@piano62lyu
Please, note I'm not saying Gould was 'right'.
I'm only asking a question about this interesting item.
Thanks for understanding this.
Geert.
geertdehoux 9 months ago
@geertdehoux
All of us put our personality into the music that we perform. Otherwise, what we are doing in arts, right? -:) I am just saying my opinion about only one fragment. Other people liked Gould's Visions and I did not. Both sides are right, I believe.
Thanks.
Laryssa
piano62lyu 9 months ago
@piano62lyu
Thanks for your interesting comment.
A cordial greeting,
Geert.
geertdehoux 9 months ago
@piano62lyu
Anyway, how many Visions did Gould record ?
geertdehoux 9 months ago
@geertdehoux I think this only
enriquem90 9 months ago
@enriquem90
Sí, supongo que solo una.
Gracias por contestar,
Geert Dehoux.
geertdehoux 9 months ago
@tsiyishin - ignore your tutor. Play it however you like it, in your free time if you must, without anyone else hearing. Your tutor's opinion (while possibly valid) is not important. Gould -really- broke the rules with this one - but listen to how unique and beautiful his interpretation is.
DJPsionix 1 year ago
@DJPsionix
Well said.
geertdehoux 9 months ago
@tsyishin it is allowed only for Gould ;)
grazusrytas 1 year ago
@grazusrytas I think we allowed him far too many things :-) remember berstein speech apropos brahms piano concerto? ;-)
amatorynumber 1 year ago
gorgeous
usernameoccupato 1 year ago
I think this is the first time I've heard Gould play Prokofiev (I know there's a recording of the 7th sonata). The tempo is slow but I think it works well. He should have made a recording of the whole opus 22.
NorkelFjols 1 year ago
It's nice to hear how Gould viewed this piece, but, alas, his tempo is just too slow.
ssprokofiev 1 year ago
touching the mystical world with his fingers...
konstantinidisgeorge 1 year ago
Wow. I haven't played this since 1983. Such nice memories of discovering Prokofieff. The tempo illuminates the work.
Composerland 1 year ago
at first I thought it was Will Ferrell doing a gag version.
maestromaticdc 1 year ago
amazing...
onestaplease 1 year ago
How can anyway dislike this video? AWESOMENESS!
stargirl2007a 1 year ago
Amazing. The slow tempo bothered me at first, but I now consider this the ultimate version of the piece. I'd really like to hear how he interpreted the rest of the visions.
winterwind1810 1 year ago
mose68 Gould as usual is very eccentric. Timing is very slow, However, the result is impressive more like Debussy than Prokoviev,
rmosetti 1 year ago
Boris Berman has recorded all the Prokofiev piano music beautifully!
kevasman 1 year ago
I will. I have enormous respect for the composer but to suppress criticism is the type of regime that Prokoffieff would have hated as he lived under it. If I say I don't like something what is the problem? Free speech remember. A better response would have been to say why YOU like the piece.
stockcar5472 1 year ago
Comment removed
stargirl2007a 1 year ago
Oh boy. I sure thought I had all of Prokofiev's Visions Fugitives in that Prokofiev Plays Prokofiev CD I bought.
This is superb. And like the previous Visions Fugitives I've heard, it hints impressionism.
mrpossibilities 1 year ago
ultimately ethereal
FreieStadtElbing 1 year ago
It is okay not be able to grasp the music of a genius (I have this with Schumann and Chopin), but it's rather ignorant to blame the genius ..lol
quinto34 1 year ago
I think Gould, and Prokofiev would've either got along spledidly or just not at all if they ever knew each other.
ProkofievRules 1 year ago 2
Any monkey could write this rubbish.
stockcar5472 1 year ago
Yes you're right!
But a man did it first... monkey!
elvaril 1 year ago
@elvaril Truly awful piece. Love the piano concertos - if this is a representation of the angst of modernism blah blah blah ... what utter nonsense! Prokofiev must have been having his piano tuned the day he wrote this!
stockcar5472 1 year ago
@stockcar5472
Ok i agree with you about "prokovief's tuned piano" but after reading Doistoievki book something about Russian spirit appears: it' isnt angst of modernism but a private moment between god and a man that gave so much of its blood to people. Here's the tragical fugitiv vision of what human beeing is really made... clumsiness and fear
cheers my friend
elvaril 1 year ago
Comment removed
stargirl2007a 1 year ago
And thus, horror movie music was born.
Yoshi5020 1 year ago
My favourite vision too!But ,sorry master Glen Gould,that's not quite andante! What a pitty!
moscadoda94 1 year ago
my favourite vision
Bartekdex 1 year ago
Dissonance, confusion-- one of the last colors of nature emulated by musicians.
And what now? What's new after it's all been done before? ...I'm sure this was the concern of Modernism. I guess the response was that the medium changed--music serves entirely different purposes these days. Commercialism, I guess.
Yoshi5020 1 year ago 13
@Yoshi5020
Dissonance yes, confusion no. The artists stepping into new light have exact ideas what kind of voice they want to generate. Confused are the audiences, when they can't catch up with the new creativity. Most of us like like old dogs, unable to learn new tricks. The only way to be less confused, is to give up stubbornness and embrace newness.
markchentx 6 months ago
@Yoshi5020 Multitonality, to me, is the addition of another dimension to music rather than the destruction of one. There is so much in our modern world to describe; transcendence, integration, horror.
hymnofashes 5 months ago
@Yoshi5020 Have you bothered to try and find any contemporary music before assuming it didn't exist?
ivanmikyska 5 months ago
Just watching some different performances of this- very nice, as usual- I always wonder with these vids of Gould if those frozen moments are due to editing/splicing? I presume they are.
composerdoh 1 year ago
Not quite andante
foxzen9 2 years ago
@foxzen9 you're a fucking idiot
gonofrio 1 year ago
He's not idiot! He's absolutely right!
moscadoda94 1 year ago
nice one.
LarsYenin 2 years ago
Mekong Delta (a german techno-thrash band) are very influenced by Prokofiev, along with M. Mussorgsky and other romanticist composer. One of their records is even named Visions Fugitives.
LLeft 2 years ago
thnx for sharing
bergsedijk 2 years ago
Prokofiev
deemilieu 2 years ago
Another weird one from Gould - this is so insanely slow a tempo for this piece I hardly recognized it.
kevasman 2 years ago
@kevasman Can you give a recommendation, then, of a version you like? This is the only one I found on YouTube that I did like...XD
stargirl2007a 1 year ago
lol actually that's not actually true......only one I found LOL
stargirl2007a 1 year ago
what a pro =)
spynuker 2 years ago
What an amazing interpretation. I wish I could pull it off this slow.
joenopride 2 years ago
id hit that!!
johngoforth77 2 years ago
I wish I would acquire a stronger taste for a well-constructed piece such as this.
Zebeldarebel 2 years ago
This sounds indeed weird, but if you listened to post-hardcore music, you would fall in love with nearly all pieces from Prokofiev.
Cornour 2 years ago
Funny you should mention that. I think that Prokofiev's Toccata op.11 is heavier than most metal bands I've heard to date, and it was composed almost a century ago.
Certainly interesting to find the roots of heavy metal in the great composers of yesteryear.
animalmother1065 2 years ago
There is none save emotion.
I'd like you to find one heavy metal band that cites Prokofiev as inspiration.
I think you are confusing your own experience with others.
When I listen to Beethoven, Bach, Ives, Metallica I am listening through my own experience and find similarities within the music not of the music itself but my own experience.
EMPERORMIKI 2 years ago
Finding comparisons based off of experiences is one way to find similarities within the music, but I must disagree that there is no comparison between the two outside the realm of emotion. Based off the simple fact that there exists a major and minor system of scales for both classical music and heavy metal, then I feel it is safe to make the assumption that there are similarities between the two.
animalmother1065 2 years ago
Not to mention the fact that classical music inspired ragtime, which inspired jazz, which inspired blues, which inspired rock n roll, which inspired classic rock, which inspired metal.
While I do not know if Necrophagist specifically said that Prokofiev was an influence on their music, I do know that they took a theme from Prokofiev's Romeo and Juliet as a segment for one of their metal riffs to conclude one of their songs. That to me is inspiration enough.
animalmother1065 2 years ago
Actually, all the styles you mentioned are part of popular music—not classical music.
Japanese imperial music and Lady Gaga are both sonically based (as in language)—of course there are similarities. That however does not give merit to your claim.
I'm not saying they shouldn't mix—I mix things all the time in terms of music.
However, using a theme of Prokovief I guess amounts to inspiration.
EMPERORMIKI 2 years ago
You must not listen to much metal. The harmonic minor tendencies are obviously taken from classical music exclusively. Necrophagist, although very disjointed in comparison, is undeniably influenced by classical music not only with their harmonic minor progressions but also the raised 4ths. If you listen to real technical innovative metal rather than bluesy or w/e you will find classical influence.
parquar 2 years ago
J' en ai la chair de poule! Quelle ambiance extraordinaire!
apuland 2 years ago
Comment removed
apuland 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Pretty cacophonous in my opinion. I find it easy to play Beethoven in an impassioned manner, but I don't see how Gould can find any meaning in this.
kaner333 2 years ago
Eh bien abandonnez le piano et essayez la grosse caisse...
AnnaderWald 2 years ago
Truly extraordinary interpretation!
Pogouldiwitz 2 years ago
unbelievably magical
no other words here
Frederikamusic 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Impressive and very expressive playing, but the song sucks. Sorry.
Burkemaster 2 years ago
Hahahaha, how come I find it pure genius?
Cornour 2 years ago
This is a huge trip
quinto34 2 years ago
Incredible.
dweezlzor 2 years ago
lost for words, other than : merci.
CaptainBluebear08 2 years ago
Ah yes the incomparable Glen Gould. We miss you Glen, this world is a sadder place without you. Things are pretty bad here in douchebag central. You would faint at the sight of what is called "Talent" these days. Much love to you.
slowstrummer1 2 years ago 12
Beautiful. You can feel the very soul of the music.
musicdivinemusic 2 years ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
"You can feel the soul of the music,"? What are you talking about? The music doesn't have a soul---WE do; the composer does. Music is only the numerical vehicle. The Ghost in the Machine?----i don't think so. No.
innerpig 2 years ago
We do? No fuckwit, NOBODY does.
jezmuff 2 years ago
Well then what was the the person who made the comment about feeling the soul of the music talking about then? She (he?) said "you can feel the very soul of the music. If there is no soul, then what is referring to exactly. Tell us. Show these fuckwit's your grand wisdom.
innerpig 2 years ago
i cant
stagesix6 2 years ago
Smell of forbidden flower
aphalga 2 years ago
really liked this, and thanks for posting.
INTERNETVID 2 years ago
I have a 'back in the day' true story.
My Grandfather owned a tailor shop in Toronto. Glenn wanted a suit and nearly didn't get one, for my grandad was not tolerant of anyone who appeared to be- light in the loafers, shall we say. It took my uncle to point out that GG was one of Canada's most famous musicians. Gramps relented,
Glenn got his tux and remained a loyal customer after that. This was back in the early 1960's
Ticky.
TheTickTockGirl 2 years ago 3
yea right
madpop17 2 years ago
Yet, Grandaddy was wrong. Gould wasn't gay. Hah!
princeandrey 2 years ago
&fmt=18 copy and paste this code at end of this websites url address. For higher audio/video quality.
ChrisWatch 2 years ago
In the words of the late Leonard Bernstein on Glenn Gould:
"This guy is nuts but he is a genious!"
This was an awesome interpretation.
Hervinbalfour 2 years ago
That comment is attributed to Szell.. But Bernstein was also a fan. :P
micheldvorsky 2 years ago
This is brilliant
ScriabinAlexander 3 years ago 2
Yes, it's rather slow but very effective. Ivo Pogorelich take notice!
andretchaikowskycom 3 years ago 4
Visionary music played by a visionary musician, the great Glenn Gould!
northicekate 3 years ago 5
its sound realy good at a slow tempo...the best interpretation i´ve heard
agrandb 3 years ago 5
I dont understand the greatness of that piece. I cant....
leptosz 3 years ago
To leptosz: one approach to appreciate any piece of music. Listen to a bit, hit pause and try to imagine what sounds would come next. Hit play again and see where the composer went instead. Go with the composer to this new place that you would not have expected.
highlandsh 2 years ago 18
That sounds awesome. That is really a great exercise for musical attention and musical appreciation. Thank you!
mrpossibilities 1 year ago 3
@highlandsh what a beautiful, gentle and smart thing to say. cheers.
Sveccha93 1 year ago
@highlandsh ...where does that leave the serial composers...where the guys are following the freaking row?..
fredericfranc 9 months ago
@fredericfranc Re serial composers and trying to imagine what comes next. IMO serial composition is not simply a mechanical process. The composer still needs to compose: chose the register, rythmn, dynamics, juxtaposition of competing and counterpoint lines, instrumentation. They use their ears, imagination and musical sensibility. If not, we could study baroque technique and all sound like Bach.
highlandsh 9 months ago
@highlandsh ...still, would be very hard for the listener of a serial composition to put into practice what you are proposing...because they would be obligated to follow the tone row strictures that the composer who is following this practice is himself obligated to follow...for the listener, it is damn hard to do, unless they have assimilated the row beforehand...and how realistic is that?..
fredericfranc 9 months ago
@fredericfranc I suppose a skilled listener could actually hear the sequence of a row but then, how many listeners to Beethoven hear the modulations and functional harmonies? You could miss the forest for the trees. Serial is a means to an end, there must still be music as a result of the system and that is what you want to hear, whether it is Cage, Ravel, Nancarrow or Orlando di Lasso.
gbeachy2010 9 months ago
@gbeachy2010 I understand your:"...there must still be music as a result of the system..." but my comment is to Mr. highlandsh's: "..listen...hit a pause...try to imagine what comes next..." proposition. Try doing THAT in the case of a real stiff serial composition like Schoenberg's "Moses and Aaron"...if you can hear that kind of singing AHEAD of the composer to any effect, well, you are pretty freaking good...
fredericfranc 9 months ago
A very interesting slow interpretation. I wouldn't be able to get away with playing it THAT slow!
Melorama2000 3 years ago
But, well, it's an Andante... Meant to be slow, no ?
sorwell 3 years ago 2
It would be great to ambulate to this... Haha
Kurtyoungblood 3 years ago
Prokofiev: a visionary composer.
Opoczynski 3 years ago 7
Briiiiiiiiliiiiiiiiant!
dizygotegemini 3 years ago 5
so darn slow, but it works. keeps me into it the whole time.
acridplacidity3 3 years ago 17
@acridplacidity3
Well said.
geertdehoux 9 months ago
Breathtaking! Easily one of the finest pianists of the 20Th. century! A true genius! Bravo! TY.
paulostroff99 3 years ago 9
Extraordinaire.
sorwell 3 years ago 7