that "CC.org" (mentioned @ 3:46). is an ACTUAL website, and it is NOT related to CreativeCommons (for the record, the website is Copyrighted instead of under a CC license).
Copyright is an old and outdated method. CC is a new "copyright" for the digital age. It's not reflection of content quality. There's plenty of copyrighted material these days that are poor, to say the least. In the old days books rarely had errors. Now they are replete with errors.
CC seems to be a lawyer method of taxing the innocent and the "un-hip." and another form of control... The whole thing and semantics of CC gives me the heebee jeebees.
if Creative Common's isnt suitable to you, dont use it, do not judge content created by others as poor simply cause they opt to use (CC) instead of (C).
If you want all your rights, reserve them with (C)
I work in higher education and create high quality learning objects that I share, without cost, to other educators. If you make your living off of your music, you probably want to use full copyright rather than CC. But it has nothing to do with the quality being poor. After all there's no guarantee that someone who uses full copyright, isn't copyrighting poor content.
Excellent info..Music and video has been a tricky issue in regards to Ascap infringements.We've decided to stick with our own compositions to avoid problems..enjoy the shows!
Great idea, it costs 50,000€ plus for a solution to defining record contracts (mechanicals etc etc) with this been out there it (if bullet proof from sharks) can atleast caryy on a date and details for licenses.
Watch lyrics here : /watch?v=FdBvREo30eA
tekripper90 6 months ago
Finally: Somebody who can just tell me what Creative Commons is simply and easily.
Gallifrey103 7 months ago
Great German CC-Movie upcoming! Exodos.cc, shot professional on Red and in English, watch and screen yourself!
SenderFN 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Time to stop crying try Russian women gettop5.info
KateTiclb 1 year ago
WARNING:
that "CC.org" (mentioned @ 3:46). is an ACTUAL website, and it is NOT related to CreativeCommons (for the record, the website is Copyrighted instead of under a CC license).
bub777 1 year ago
I think people in USA just grab about anything and put it elsewhere under the Fair Use concept, without even looking at who made the product
Raffaello9 1 year ago
Creative Commons rocks!:D
pinkflowers28 2 years ago 3
Hi Dr Daring! I agree with you when you say there's not a reflection of contention quality.
But you really think: "Grammar-semantic errors are a consequence of Creative Commons?"
It seems fallacy
Think about it
Ennio - Brasil
Ennio6pack 2 years ago
Copyright is an old and outdated method. CC is a new "copyright" for the digital age. It's not reflection of content quality. There's plenty of copyrighted material these days that are poor, to say the least. In the old days books rarely had errors. Now they are replete with errors.
DrDaringPhD 2 years ago
CC sounds like 'Closed Caption' to me!!!
Anyone could mistaken that on a youtube video!!! :p
illuminazzo 3 years ago
CC seems to be a lawyer method of taxing the innocent and the "un-hip." and another form of control... The whole thing and semantics of CC gives me the heebee jeebees.
mekman7 3 years ago
Then how do I look up the artist's CC license, to find out how he want content is being use?
renyenhawaii 3 years ago
Freedom CC :)
i love CC , Lawerence Lewsig is awesome guy , like Talbolt Linus , Bram Cohen , and Richard Stallman and everyone who shares :)
jmm1233 3 years ago
can I put a creative commons on my youtube videos?
Steinninn 4 years ago 2
i agree with you ljsab but not completely.
it's not for everyone the solution, but i won't declare that the work of the people who uses this license is poor.
hub23 4 years ago
i'm a musician and 'CC' scares the shit out of me. I want all my rights. CC is great for anyone who is content being poor.
ljsab 4 years ago
if Creative Common's isnt suitable to you, dont use it, do not judge content created by others as poor simply cause they opt to use (CC) instead of (C).
If you want all your rights, reserve them with (C)
rainbowcomputers 4 years ago 9
I work in higher education and create high quality learning objects that I share, without cost, to other educators. If you make your living off of your music, you probably want to use full copyright rather than CC. But it has nothing to do with the quality being poor. After all there's no guarantee that someone who uses full copyright, isn't copyrighting poor content.
gstorts 4 years ago 4
another great video chris!
acehydro06 4 years ago
Excellent info..Music and video has been a tricky issue in regards to Ascap infringements.We've decided to stick with our own compositions to avoid problems..enjoy the shows!
sneakerset 4 years ago
I use CC on my deviantart page. DA does a great job of making it easy and tranparent to add to your content!
webboy9579 4 years ago
Thanks for that info, Chris. I'm a designer and didn't know about this way of licensing. I'm definitely going to look into this. Thanks again.
IceflowStudios 4 years ago
Great idea, it costs 50,000€ plus for a solution to defining record contracts (mechanicals etc etc) with this been out there it (if bullet proof from sharks) can atleast caryy on a date and details for licenses.
illuminatika 4 years ago