Added: 2 years ago
From: doismiledoze
Views: 9,998
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (43)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Will surfers be able to "catch a wave" to survival?

  • @SimperingSimpleton sure they will, no problem at all, only maybe small problem of the speed of the way which would be around 1000 kmh

  • so, what youre telling me , is that the Mayans could forsee the destruction of the world , but, couldnt see the Spaniards completely stomping a mud hole in their asses?? hahahhahaahahhah

  • this interviewer is irritating

  • In all the vast amounts of knowledge available on the Internet today, there still remains an elusive Truth. And I always thought the Internet was set out to correct this?

  • @myvoyageful You think this guy sounds like he has a lot of pent up bullshit to spew, too? Thank GOD he's not creditable, or else we'd be in deep doo doo butter.

  • @darkbit1001 Well there was lots of birds dying this winter and some fish, if by next year you see wales swim to the wrong pole and end up in some beach, and reports of auroras besides the ones in the pole, and cell phones reception go down, we better watch the fk out! lol

  • gunna need a big fuckoff boat to get over a 2 km wave.

  • what about a personal submarine and stay down till the waves are over , come up. if its still bad , get little air . and go back down. ect . ect . maybe hot air bailloon ? rocketship ? go to mars , moon , what waaaaaaaaaaaaa Help!

  • You are a stupid ass, that's what you are.

  • he says "That will be worse than the stone age" if this doesn't happen, he will go to the stone age, nobody would like to hire him as an employee! I mean people will look at him and say "so you wanted the end of the world uh"...paco rabanne said the same thing and nobody wants to befriend him since that day. the guy was a designer!

  • Patrick ! it's POle shift not BULL SHIT/OR PULL SHIFT

  • @jetaimemonamour100 clean your ears!

  • We will just have to wait and see - )

  • Hahahahaha another wacko.

  • NoPrivacyANYMORE10 don't start commenting on people's comments like you know everything, you don't know anything and nobody knows. You're delusional so is Patrick Geryl. LOL you crack me up.

  • @britneymccoys Don't tell me what i can and can't comment on you little Nazi.

  • He's full of crap

  • A brilliant critique britney -("britney" lol) overflowing with devastating refutations. You must publish and flesh it out even more! The world awaits.

  • Well, I created this user name randomly, I didn't want to use my real name, Genius. I'm not a fan of Britney or whatever, I'm not going to explain myself or be defensive because that's not your business. All you crazy people can believe whatever you want. Patrick Geryl is a fraud, he is not a psychic, he is a psycho who wants to gain money by writing 'fiction' books about 2012 and all that C R A P.

  • @britneymccoys Having briefly -and "defensively" explained yr reasons for selecting that username you go on to say that you're"..not going to explain [your]self or be defensive..." --lol.

    Given the substanceless yak yak yakking of yr non-response, i hardly think yr qualified, Britney, to assess the pros and cons of his rather technical argument, do you? Cliff High's gone through his math & verified its veracity; others more illustrious have too, including Israel's leading mathematician. You fool

  • @britney

    & how gauche you are to assume that b/c i'm criticising the baseless assertions of others here (including you, Britney, who supplied this page with THE most baseless, emotionally-driven comment of all), that i must necessarily subscribe to his doomsday prognosis. I weigh the hard evidence; examine all sides (where possible) & reserve judgement until such time as i fully understand both the arguments& counter-arguments. What's yr approach i wonder? " Ooh - i don't like his voice" -lol

  • @britneymccoys Britney, you should go play with your dolls and leave the thinking to rational people. I understand the prospect of a worldwide cataclysm scares the shit out of you, but lashing out in denial isn't the way to find anything out.

    Geryl never claims to be psychic, he is talking about astronomy and magnetism, which are both scientific principles.

    None of us are "crazy people believing whatever we want", that description more aptly suits you.

    Refute his evidence or have no point.

  • @n0s1r LMAO, well let's wait and see what happens in 2012. Then all of you are going to look really stupid. Fuckers.

  • @britneymccoys Ok, I will now do what you were incapable of... I will REASONABLY refute what Patrick Geryl is saying. (I never said anything was going to happen in 2012, I said something COULD happen, and I pointed out you were acting raving like a lunatic about it instead of being rational)

    The magnetic field of the Earth works a like a capacitor, meaning the negative field surrounds the positive field like a sort of nucleus. So a south to south push of the magnetic field is impossible.

  • @n0s1r it already happened, it started in 1999, i know for fact...

  • @FiaBallProduction really now?

  • @n0s1r It will happen for all the skeptics, so you better be on the Earth's side.... the august 01 solar explosion was the start, it happened right after the grand cross alignment.... for those who do not study the sacred sciences, it's hard to figure out if this is true or not.... as one who is connected to the force and here's the whisper's of the spirits, I will tell you... "!THIS IS AS REAL AS IT GETS!"

  • @britneymccoys You reacted to this issue with pure irrational emotion. You investigated nothing, you researched nothing. You simply flailed your arms about, stuck your head in the sand, and proclaimed anybody who was even willing to look into the matter as a "nut".

    I did the job of rationally refuting Patrick Geryl's claim for you. You should thank me. Now you have something to tell people that is based in science, as opposed to the childish emotional nay-saying you were using before.

  • this isnt what is going to happen and certainly not in 2012

    as pluto enters our solar system changes take place and there will be changes and climate changes and maybe a pole shift no doubt about that at all.

    but not in 2012 as an absolute

  • "maybe" a pole shift "no doubt about that at all". What does that mean? No doubt that there "may be" a pole shift? Apart from your Tsarion-esque derivations vis-a-vis Pluto what other data suports your "absolute" assertion that it won't happen in 2012, genius?

  • *supports

  • Comment removed

  • ive been around prophecy for many many years,and my best judgement is that dec 21 2012 will be a date when looked back upon just a few years after -that it will be seen as a significant time to put the time line on as to things deteriorating quite badly, but as to something drastic happening on that date itself, i dont think that is what will happen, but things will certainly happen from then onwards as it is even now

    but for yourself maybe you should prepare for dec 21 2012

  • Patrick seems to me , that he is not relying on hope or faith or any religious help. He is speaking of science and his view on what is coming. He explains his theory plainly and succinctly. who knows if his theoy is wrong..or perhaps ..right.

    we shall see soon enough .

  • Very doom and gloom Patrick. Sorry but i do not buy it at all !

  • But if the science supported kittens and flowers and rolling meadows you would "buy it", Mr. What a shower? - lol

  • Our current science is barely scraching the surface of this reality. There is a lot more to touch upon, that Geryl is not ever keen to know.

    Just remember not to base your scientific conclusions on some ONE GUY's work.

  • Don't judge others by yr own low standards. It's a common mistake amongst fools like you. I AM NOT basing any "scientific conclusions" on "ONE GUY's work", Whatever went through yr mind when you were writing that? Bushelweed? I'll bet it's a dry and dusty, empty place, yr mind. As someone with an interest in 2012 ever since i read Archaic Revival by Terence McKenna (novelty theory) i'm not & never have been constricted by narrow academic methodology. You fool -  you presumptious fool.

  • @NoPrivacyANYMORE10 We should talk. I have been looking for people on here who are actually capable of using reason. I have some come across some interesting information that refutes Patrick Geryls claim.

    Apparently the magnetic field of the Earth operates like a capacitor, with the negative field being wrapped around the positive field. If this is the case it would render Geryl's theory of a south to south repulsion of the Earths magnetic field due to solar magnetism impossible.

  • AAHAHAH

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more