Killtown, delete as needed. I ran across your name on some blogspot by some asshole totally ripping on you for the 911 truth. You should have seen the lengths they went through trying to track you down, saying all kinds of BS. I could tell they are Bush backing rightwing nutjobs that can't handle when somebody asks questions thus you are on their Sht list. I too have had the Pubes try to track me as they can't seem to find Bin Ladin so they go after those who expose BUSH for the POS he is.
The cyberstalkers you speak of are Jo Cressy (aka 'Col Jenny Sparks' who hangs out at TruthAction) and Scott Vincent (aka Genghis6199). They are both vile people who desperately need psychiatric care. Pray for them.
WTKT, you should see the nutjobs in my area. They run everything here and are infiltrated deep in the AirForce and Military DHLS. My city even has a black ops unit to drive out "Undesirables" from this military christian community. I ran into them when they got caught trying to drive me out. Then I found out were THEY Live. A little different when the target shows up at midnight on their doorsteps.Land of the FREE, except certain areas.....
Sorry I mixed up your "Theory." That should have said "fuel tank." They planted a plane fuel tank on the lawn, not engine. So no one noticed the camera didn't pick it up, it just sat there waiting to explode magically invisible and then it didn't yield enough "parts" so they ran outside after a huge explosion and started laying down "plane parts" from God knows where, and nobody noticed anything. So the media and everyone in the building was in on it not to mention bystanders - PLEASE!
You mean you do not acknowledge how farfetched and ridiculous it is to claim (based on nothing) that rather than a plane crashing into the pentagon, and then a crew cleaning up wreckage, instead, a "plane engine" was planted on the lawn but no one saw it, it sat there waiting to explode in a pretend act while a plane flew right by to "pretend" as if it crashed, and then there was no wreckage (save for the engine parts?) so they ran out there and planted parts before anyone saw, then cleaned
Yes that was precisely my point. Scorch marks from a plane. So you admit that. So you admit that the plane caused scorch marks, as backed up by eyewitness account, yet you will have us believe that the plane crashed without any wreckage. No, there WAS wreckage that they were cleaning up right away as they also fought the fires still burning. There were eyewitness accounts of a plane flying low overhead going towards the pentagon. One eyewitness is caught on film a few min later!
LOL, if they "staged" it wouldn't it have made sense to plant wreckage right away rather than wait until hours after the fact. They thought no one would notice? come on, your stuff is not believable.
And why did a "bomb" inside a building scorch the grass in the lawn in front of the building? LOL. We can all see the black scorch marks very clearly. Your video basically amounts to telling a blind person he really can see despite what he experiences himself.
@KWRBT so when a plane crashes all you get is "scorch marks"? Sorry but you should have a HUGE amount of debris and or gouges in the ground! Show me proof of a plane hitting this building. You can't because there is NONE.
But at the very beginning of your own video, about 10 seconds in, he says this is "9 hours later" that they are still taking care of the mess. So 9 hours later means way after all the plane parts have been gathered up already for evidence (which was done right away while fire was combatted by firemen). Very convenient for you, but if we saw the plane parts RIGHT AFTER the crash it would be very obvious what caused it. Not 9 hours later.
@KWRBT oh so people picked up 60+ tons of aircraft parts while people could be dying inside the building? I highly doubt they would have been able to remove everything right away. but that doesn't even matter seeings how there are pictures of the aftermath VERY soon after the explosion and there are NO plane parts.
@agentzippo What you say is a lie. There are pictures that do show plane parts. So obviously those pictures that show plane parts were taken before the ones that don't. It's a very simple equation. Please utilize your brain.
@KWRBT there are very few pieces of something on the ground yes. but no huge piles of wreckage that you should see after a 767 crashing. Go kill yourself you're not helping.
@agentzippo The plane crashed into the building, not the ground. So there will be more wreckage in the building's destruction than on the ground in front of it. 911research dot wtc7 dot net slash pentagon slash evidence slash photos slash index dot H tee m l
@KWRBT i can see where 80 tons of plane wreckage could be cleaned up in 9 hours. just whip out my handy dandy shop vac and wha la, presto cleano. 9/11 - inside job.
@vengencefrom1979 You're a moron. MOST of the wreckage is where the plane actually crashed, which is into the building. If you look at pictures you will see wreckage in there too.
@KWRBT youre the only moron around here for thinking that the american people would buy this crap forever. if you are a shill youd better find cover cause hanging for treason aint out of style.
@ctcole77 if there are no wings, tail section, or fuselage, what happened to ctcole's brain? did it evaporate when he was dropped as a baby and landed on his head? or did it sink into the earth like at shanksville, not to be dug up for weeks when no one is looking?
@ctcole77 god knows what they done with passangers.. but yeah where is the bodies and luggage and big engines and all the other missing stuff.. fact is if it was a 757 there would have to be 757 wreckage and remains of its contents.. the massive titanium bladed engines and the wings where did they go?.. how many world first previously considered impossible things can happen in one day.. hence why the official story evidence soley rely's on pushing over some lamp posts lol .. when it was smokey..
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
good to see the Helicopter-Landing-Gear of Fakeness making another appearence.
that means the video was a composite image, made up of different videos, possibly including computer animation layers, and then plastered over with the helicopter landing gear in final edit, to make it seem more believeable that it was real. :)
why: just to ensure a good high quality video was ready for the news, which showed the desirable bits and nothing else. probably not that important in hindesight. T_T
See YT Vid:
9-11 Cheney Rumsfeld Black Operation at Pentagon...15min.
also...Pentagon Attack Papers....6min 5sec
For reports of 6 explosions heard.....
Multiple explosions at the pentagon on 9/11 4min 48sec
MrNoblemanoflove 1 week ago
I dont see a plane crash here...
LafreniereJ 2 months ago
wheres the plane?
triflind 1 year ago
In-credible = Non- credible
No plane hit the Pentagon nor the WTC towers.
Rcoxx4u 2 years ago
what evidence have you shown, nothing youve just stated that a 757 didnt hit the pentagon. stupid idiot
Adzzgray777 2 years ago
Killtown, delete as needed. I ran across your name on some blogspot by some asshole totally ripping on you for the 911 truth. You should have seen the lengths they went through trying to track you down, saying all kinds of BS. I could tell they are Bush backing rightwing nutjobs that can't handle when somebody asks questions thus you are on their Sht list. I too have had the Pubes try to track me as they can't seem to find Bin Ladin so they go after those who expose BUSH for the POS he is.
911sheeple 2 years ago
The cyberstalkers you speak of are Jo Cressy (aka 'Col Jenny Sparks' who hangs out at TruthAction) and Scott Vincent (aka Genghis6199). They are both vile people who desperately need psychiatric care. Pray for them.
WelcomeToKilltown 2 years ago
WTKT, you should see the nutjobs in my area. They run everything here and are infiltrated deep in the AirForce and Military DHLS. My city even has a black ops unit to drive out "Undesirables" from this military christian community. I ran into them when they got caught trying to drive me out. Then I found out were THEY Live. A little different when the target shows up at midnight on their doorsteps.Land of the FREE, except certain areas.....
911sheeple 2 years ago
the reporter seems to wanna be sure you know it is '9 hours later'. does it look like almost 7 in the evening to you?
EarthsGravitySucks 2 years ago
MORE new 9/11 footage (with chopper skids getting in the way) ? Where do these images come from, anyway?
The 9/11 image-pool will not become any more real no matter how much new footage gets gradually released.
simonshack 2 years ago
Actor MARK ADRIAN HUMPHREY is the Harley Shirt Guy!
911-harley-shirt-guy blogspot com
911scam 2 years ago
Sorry I mixed up your "Theory." That should have said "fuel tank." They planted a plane fuel tank on the lawn, not engine. So no one noticed the camera didn't pick it up, it just sat there waiting to explode magically invisible and then it didn't yield enough "parts" so they ran outside after a huge explosion and started laying down "plane parts" from God knows where, and nobody noticed anything. So the media and everyone in the building was in on it not to mention bystanders - PLEASE!
KWRBT 2 years ago
You mean you do not acknowledge how farfetched and ridiculous it is to claim (based on nothing) that rather than a plane crashing into the pentagon, and then a crew cleaning up wreckage, instead, a "plane engine" was planted on the lawn but no one saw it, it sat there waiting to explode in a pretend act while a plane flew right by to "pretend" as if it crashed, and then there was no wreckage (save for the engine parts?) so they ran out there and planted parts before anyone saw, then cleaned
KWRBT 2 years ago
You don't acknowledge how insane that sounds and that it is rather funny when someone claims they honestly believe that is what happened?
KWRBT 2 years ago
LOL!
KWRBT 2 years ago
Yes that was precisely my point. Scorch marks from a plane. So you admit that. So you admit that the plane caused scorch marks, as backed up by eyewitness account, yet you will have us believe that the plane crashed without any wreckage. No, there WAS wreckage that they were cleaning up right away as they also fought the fires still burning. There were eyewitness accounts of a plane flying low overhead going towards the pentagon. One eyewitness is caught on film a few min later!
KWRBT 2 years ago
LOL, if they "staged" it wouldn't it have made sense to plant wreckage right away rather than wait until hours after the fact. They thought no one would notice? come on, your stuff is not believable.
KWRBT 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Where is the plane?
Sorry I'm Not buying it.
Release the 80+ videos and than we can talk.
4Freedomrider 2 years ago
And why did a "bomb" inside a building scorch the grass in the lawn in front of the building? LOL. We can all see the black scorch marks very clearly. Your video basically amounts to telling a blind person he really can see despite what he experiences himself.
KWRBT 2 years ago 7
@KWRBT so when a plane crashes all you get is "scorch marks"? Sorry but you should have a HUGE amount of debris and or gouges in the ground! Show me proof of a plane hitting this building. You can't because there is NONE.
agentzippo 1 year ago
But at the very beginning of your own video, about 10 seconds in, he says this is "9 hours later" that they are still taking care of the mess. So 9 hours later means way after all the plane parts have been gathered up already for evidence (which was done right away while fire was combatted by firemen). Very convenient for you, but if we saw the plane parts RIGHT AFTER the crash it would be very obvious what caused it. Not 9 hours later.
KWRBT 2 years ago 10
@KWRBT oh so people picked up 60+ tons of aircraft parts while people could be dying inside the building? I highly doubt they would have been able to remove everything right away. but that doesn't even matter seeings how there are pictures of the aftermath VERY soon after the explosion and there are NO plane parts.
agentzippo 1 year ago
@agentzippo What you say is a lie. There are pictures that do show plane parts. So obviously those pictures that show plane parts were taken before the ones that don't. It's a very simple equation. Please utilize your brain.
KWRBT 1 year ago
@KWRBT there are very few pieces of something on the ground yes. but no huge piles of wreckage that you should see after a 767 crashing. Go kill yourself you're not helping.
agentzippo 1 year ago
@agentzippo The plane crashed into the building, not the ground. So there will be more wreckage in the building's destruction than on the ground in front of it. 911research dot wtc7 dot net slash pentagon slash evidence slash photos slash index dot H tee m l
KWRBT 1 year ago
@KWRBT i can see where 80 tons of plane wreckage could be cleaned up in 9 hours. just whip out my handy dandy shop vac and wha la, presto cleano. 9/11 - inside job.
vengencefrom1979 1 year ago
@vengencefrom1979 You're a moron. MOST of the wreckage is where the plane actually crashed, which is into the building. If you look at pictures you will see wreckage in there too.
KWRBT 1 year ago
@KWRBT youre the only moron around here for thinking that the american people would buy this crap forever. if you are a shill youd better find cover cause hanging for treason aint out of style.
vengencefrom1979 1 year ago
3 QUESTIONS 911 TRUTHERS DON'T WANT YOU TO ASK THEM:
If the Pentagon was hit by a missile and not a plane, what happened to the passengers and crew?
How many times did William Rodriguez change his 911 testimony?
If flight 77 was a missile and not a plane, what knocked down the pole lights outside the Pentagon?
ctcole77 1 year ago
@ctcole77 if there are no wings, tail section, or fuselage, what happened to ctcole's brain? did it evaporate when he was dropped as a baby and landed on his head? or did it sink into the earth like at shanksville, not to be dug up for weeks when no one is looking?
vengencefrom1979 1 year ago
@ctcole77 god knows what they done with passangers.. but yeah where is the bodies and luggage and big engines and all the other missing stuff.. fact is if it was a 757 there would have to be 757 wreckage and remains of its contents.. the massive titanium bladed engines and the wings where did they go?.. how many world first previously considered impossible things can happen in one day.. hence why the official story evidence soley rely's on pushing over some lamp posts lol .. when it was smokey..
KungFriedChicken 4 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
great video! I will never believe it was a 757 until they release a video showing it.
666bushisnazi666 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@ 2.56 civillians , (not CSI) removing crime scene evidence . (of missile and drone ) .
No dead bodies , luggage ,seats, engines , plane bits ABSOLUTLY no sign of a large passenger filled jet what so ever.
PYTHAGORAS101 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Excellent footage, Good Find!!
ConspiracyTVUK 2 years ago
I guess all those people walking the lawn, were looking for evidence,
...like a passport, or something.
Hi KT!
rongrite 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
good to see the Helicopter-Landing-Gear of Fakeness making another appearence.
that means the video was a composite image, made up of different videos, possibly including computer animation layers, and then plastered over with the helicopter landing gear in final edit, to make it seem more believeable that it was real. :)
why: just to ensure a good high quality video was ready for the news, which showed the desirable bits and nothing else. probably not that important in hindesight. T_T
Zebadie69 2 years ago
lol. you need to get out more
Dynamicdj 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Good post!
MountainMonsters 2 years ago