Gingrich pushed for the war, with limited number of troops, indicated US, would be welcomed as liberators - Gingrich did not fuly understand the Middle East.
YouTube: Hagel - Hannity. Chuck Hagel eats Sean's lunch.Reveals as others have indicated that Bush planned the war, from day 1 of his admiinstration:
Bartlett: Imposter: How Bush bankrupted American and destroyed the Reagan legacy.
John Michaels20 according to your profile you're a diehard Democrat. What have the Democrats done about the abominations of the Bush regime? The answer is that they've done absolutely NOTHING about it and that includes Hillary and Obama as well. Your comment implies that you want Obama for President since he's the likely Democratic nominee. Obama doesn't have what it takes to correct this situation and he won't be President anyway. Therefore the only real choice is RON PAUL 2008!!!
I will not disagree with you on the fact the Democrats let themselves get steamrolled by Bush. that is nancy pelosi's fault, she is horrendous, i wish she would die, and get replaced. I think with a Democrat in the WH, the ones with backbone will eventually stand up, not to mention they are not republicans, so they get autopoints. I just feel that if Ron Paul wanted to be someone, he'd switch parties so he could make a difference. paleoconservatism died with Reagan's election
This problem transcends the terms "Democrat" and "Republican." Many so called Democrats have ulterior motives and are actually in favor of the Neocon policies of the Bush regime. Conversely many Republicans are against these policies and Ron Paul represents these old fashioned Republicans and any other groups who've had enough of the Neocon agenda. And "Paleoconservatism" was actually pretty good. We hit it just right in this country around 1988. You're too young to remember but times were good.
well today, there are a lot less dem neo-cons than repub neo-cons, consider 1 repub voted against Iraq, Lincoln Chafee, and 21 dems and 1 indy voted against it. we in 2008. Reagan invading Grenada was the precursor to Neo-conism as was Desert Storm. well whatever the date, so-called paleoconism is dead. They were corrupted by money and are never coming back. Ron Paul should face it, may if not dems, start a new party. he'd lead a good movement.
JohnMichaels Reagan really turned things around in this country and whatever military involvement we had in those years was extremely limited and brief. We were totally falling behind in manufacturing and productivity in 1980 after Carter and Reagan made this country an economic force in the world that was second to none. The only negative with Reagan was his tremendous defense spending to run the Soviets into the ground a byproduct of which was a very large deficit but we did win The Cold War.
Also Desert Storm happened during Bush Sr. so it's unclear if Reagan would've acted in the same manner in dealing with Saddam at the time. What I do know for certain about Reagan was we had PEACE during those eight years and while there was a recession early in his first term the economy was really booming during his second term. America was respected during those years and Reagan was respected internationally unlike the bastard that currently holds office.
Okay, I see that you're a retarded liberal. A balanced budget amendment and term limits horrendous ideas? I thought that you had a functioning brain, but I guess that I was wrong. Liberals oppose term limits because they support the idea of career politicians who can't even run a hot dog stand in the private sector. They oppose a balanced budget constitutional amendment because they don't want to have to make spending cuts if federal revenue for the fiscal year is low. Liberals are lazy bums.
how ironic. Newt Gingrich served far more than the the 12 years he said should have been the limit for representatives. He served for 20, from 1979-1999. height of hypocrisy. Santorum ran for a 3rd term, even tho he pledged to the contract. I would list countless hypocrites. term limits on congress are not wise. congress needs people with knowledge and experience, and connections.
Okay, I see that you're a retarded liberal. A balanced budget amendment and term limits horrendous ideas? I thought that you had a functioning brain, but I guess that I was wrong. Liberals oppose term limits because they support the idea of career politicians who can't even run a hot dog stand in the private sector. They oppose a balanced budget constitutional amendment because they don't want to have to make spending cuts if federal revenue for the fiscal year is low. Liberals are lazy bums.
Okay, I see that you're a retarded liberal. A balanced budget amendment and term limits horrendous ideas? I thought that you had a functioning brain, but I guess that I was wrong. Liberals oppose term limits because they support the idea of career politicians who can't even run a hot dog stand in the private sector. They oppose a balanced budget constitutional amendment because they don't want to have to make spending cuts if federal revenue for the fiscal year is low. Liberals are lazy bums.
Evidently the 90,000 people who went to the trouble of making videos on his behalf are more than willing to listen to Ron Paul and vote for him too. RON PAUL 2008!
How sad. I used to look to Mr. Gingrich for clarity and a bit of eloquence in describing the principles and mechanics of our American Political System. Now I just see him as another political blowhard neocon stuck on the information highway of Yugo-quality ideas by this latest account. WFBjr rest in peace.
Newt wants SOOOOO bad to be in presidental race again. I mean he REALLY REALLY hopes Mccain falls ( and he might). My hunch is, Newt is working REAL hard behind the scenes to help McCain screw up. And Newt would be better at some things than McCain.
Anything connected with a politician has got to be bad. What lies underneath the pretty cloud? Ya know the so-called wall they are building between Mexico? Well lo and behold Boeing got contracts, Homeland security is taking U.S citizen to court to steal their land..wait..Not the RICH folks that are Bush's buddies where they are getting in on the DEALS. Bush's corporate world has destroyed many lives. NEVER trust a corporation or a politician.
Zile77, Any intelligent person wouldn't take the word of Luis Farakan as serious. By doing so you are only showing us how stupid you really are. But by all means run with it because it was entertaining to read that conservative morons will actually buy into this.
Who is THE PEOPLE? And whose money do they want control? I agree that the large corporations are a problem but that has nothing to do with social security. Healthcare is a mess because of givernment meddling and because doctors get sued so much. No surprise that the largest campaign contributor is the American Bar Association. Everyone should be allowed to control HIS OWN money and not someone elses. That is true freedom.
I agree with you. When Bush ran against Gore in 2000, the liberals screamed about how important EXPERIENCE is. Well, it's quite obvious that McCain (although I don't really care much for him) has more experience than Obama. Notice how the libs aren't talking about experience this time?
The only experience that seems to have any substance these days among the GOP candidates how much more are they going to continue to fuck over the american public with the continuation of the failed policies orchestrated by the dumbest and most incompetent president and administration in the history of the United States? McCain's experience is that he is a liberal pretending to be a hard liner conservative.
What you said makes no sense. Please look up the word "experience" in the dictionary. Again, your first sentence makes no sense. McCain is hardly a Bush clone. He's to the left of Bush when the GOP really needs to be moving to the right of Bush to traditional conservatism (a la Pat Buchanan). You admit that McCain is a liberal. Therefore, you should like him, since you obviously have utter contempt for conservatives.
Wasn't welfare reform part of it? That passed. I wouldn't call the guy a fucking loser. He has a Ph.D. and was a professor. The guy's very intelligent and orchestrated the GOP takeover of Congress in 1994. Where did you get the idea that the Contract with America was lifted from Ross Perot?
Actually, a good portion of it was lifted directly from a Ronald Reagan speech, who if I remember correctly, was president before Perot even thought of running. Also, they accomplished what the contract was intended for: to get out in debate and voting a number of Acts. Some were split up and enacted seperately, others never got out of one house or the other, and a few were vetoed by Clinton. Plus, the PSLRA was a GOOD thing, helping to limit frivolous lawsuits.
almost none of the stuff was enacted, Welfare Reform was edited by the president, term limits failed, balanced budget amendment failed, most else never enacted, it was a joke. nothing but a political stunt that in the end, is a footnote in history.
John, I don't get your argument. Are you saying that it was a joke because many of the ideas didn't pass or because the ideas themselves were bad? I honestly don't know from where you are coming.
To JM20--So I take it then that "winners" use the F-word in their responses and fabricate "facts" to fit their viewpoint (which is so much easier than actually trying to understand something)
I used to like Newt but now realize he's just another neocon. It's not his business (or the business of the US, for that matter) to created ANY type of world! The world does not belong to us; only a small part of it. We need to leave the rest of the world alone to live their lives as they please, not as WE please! Our ruling class has totally screwed up our country, now they want control of the world. I hope we get commercial space travel soon so I can escape this insanity!
U are right bro. Like at Newt, he was part of the whole Iraq Iran contra, then he used the money that he and his evil counterparts made from selling those people weapons and sent those god damn mercenaries into El Salvador because he and Reagan didnt like the fact thta the people of El Salvador voted in a communist leader. Now look at El Salvador it has a non communist leader running the show. The old one got out and a new one came in. Newt is evil and I hate when they call him a hero on Fox.
Deango, I love how you say "right on, bro" when liberals supported bombing Serbia and want us to get involved in Darfur. If the world doesn't belong to us, that means that ALL interventionist wars are wrong, not just GOP interventionist wars.
Sign me up. What about using SETI's method of cpu sharing to create a better computer net for finding trends in voting aggregates?
tsmartwood 3 years ago
NEW-TIE IS A CON MAN
Lane4411 3 years ago
Gingrich pushed for the war, with limited number of troops, indicated US, would be welcomed as liberators - Gingrich did not fuly understand the Middle East.
YouTube: Hagel - Hannity. Chuck Hagel eats Sean's lunch.Reveals as others have indicated that Bush planned the war, from day 1 of his admiinstration:
Bartlett: Imposter: How Bush bankrupted American and destroyed the Reagan legacy.
Bush economic policy = Gross Incompetence Iraq.
Required reading for true fiscal conservatives.
Lane4411 3 years ago
John Michaels20 according to your profile you're a diehard Democrat. What have the Democrats done about the abominations of the Bush regime? The answer is that they've done absolutely NOTHING about it and that includes Hillary and Obama as well. Your comment implies that you want Obama for President since he's the likely Democratic nominee. Obama doesn't have what it takes to correct this situation and he won't be President anyway. Therefore the only real choice is RON PAUL 2008!!!
Wizard364 3 years ago
I will not disagree with you on the fact the Democrats let themselves get steamrolled by Bush. that is nancy pelosi's fault, she is horrendous, i wish she would die, and get replaced. I think with a Democrat in the WH, the ones with backbone will eventually stand up, not to mention they are not republicans, so they get autopoints. I just feel that if Ron Paul wanted to be someone, he'd switch parties so he could make a difference. paleoconservatism died with Reagan's election
JohnMichaels20 3 years ago
This problem transcends the terms "Democrat" and "Republican." Many so called Democrats have ulterior motives and are actually in favor of the Neocon policies of the Bush regime. Conversely many Republicans are against these policies and Ron Paul represents these old fashioned Republicans and any other groups who've had enough of the Neocon agenda. And "Paleoconservatism" was actually pretty good. We hit it just right in this country around 1988. You're too young to remember but times were good.
Wizard364 3 years ago
well today, there are a lot less dem neo-cons than repub neo-cons, consider 1 repub voted against Iraq, Lincoln Chafee, and 21 dems and 1 indy voted against it. we in 2008. Reagan invading Grenada was the precursor to Neo-conism as was Desert Storm. well whatever the date, so-called paleoconism is dead. They were corrupted by money and are never coming back. Ron Paul should face it, may if not dems, start a new party. he'd lead a good movement.
JohnMichaels20 3 years ago
JohnMichaels Reagan really turned things around in this country and whatever military involvement we had in those years was extremely limited and brief. We were totally falling behind in manufacturing and productivity in 1980 after Carter and Reagan made this country an economic force in the world that was second to none. The only negative with Reagan was his tremendous defense spending to run the Soviets into the ground a byproduct of which was a very large deficit but we did win The Cold War.
Wizard364 3 years ago
Also Desert Storm happened during Bush Sr. so it's unclear if Reagan would've acted in the same manner in dealing with Saddam at the time. What I do know for certain about Reagan was we had PEACE during those eight years and while there was a recession early in his first term the economy was really booming during his second term. America was respected during those years and Reagan was respected internationally unlike the bastard that currently holds office.
Wizard364 3 years ago
purldiver,why exactly are you mad @ Newt?
thrummer1953 3 years ago
i'm saying they were horrendous bills with rediculous ideas. of course President Clinton vetoed them
JohnMichaels20 3 years ago
Okay, I see that you're a retarded liberal. A balanced budget amendment and term limits horrendous ideas? I thought that you had a functioning brain, but I guess that I was wrong. Liberals oppose term limits because they support the idea of career politicians who can't even run a hot dog stand in the private sector. They oppose a balanced budget constitutional amendment because they don't want to have to make spending cuts if federal revenue for the fiscal year is low. Liberals are lazy bums.
Edgehead10047 3 years ago
how ironic. Newt Gingrich served far more than the the 12 years he said should have been the limit for representatives. He served for 20, from 1979-1999. height of hypocrisy. Santorum ran for a 3rd term, even tho he pledged to the contract. I would list countless hypocrites. term limits on congress are not wise. congress needs people with knowledge and experience, and connections.
JohnMichaels20 3 years ago
Okay, I see that you're a retarded liberal. A balanced budget amendment and term limits horrendous ideas? I thought that you had a functioning brain, but I guess that I was wrong. Liberals oppose term limits because they support the idea of career politicians who can't even run a hot dog stand in the private sector. They oppose a balanced budget constitutional amendment because they don't want to have to make spending cuts if federal revenue for the fiscal year is low. Liberals are lazy bums.
Edgehead10047 3 years ago
Okay, I see that you're a retarded liberal. A balanced budget amendment and term limits horrendous ideas? I thought that you had a functioning brain, but I guess that I was wrong. Liberals oppose term limits because they support the idea of career politicians who can't even run a hot dog stand in the private sector. They oppose a balanced budget constitutional amendment because they don't want to have to make spending cuts if federal revenue for the fiscal year is low. Liberals are lazy bums.
Edgehead10047 3 years ago
nop
chicaboom82 3 years ago
Will there be another "Contract With America" included in these "solutions"?
InXanadu2 3 years ago
It's because of batshit crazy people like you that most people aren't willing to listen to Ron Paul.
jacknewt 3 years ago
Evidently the 90,000 people who went to the trouble of making videos on his behalf are more than willing to listen to Ron Paul and vote for him too. RON PAUL 2008!
Wizard364 3 years ago 2
Google Ron Paul
seanrsk 3 years ago
How sad. I used to look to Mr. Gingrich for clarity and a bit of eloquence in describing the principles and mechanics of our American Political System. Now I just see him as another political blowhard neocon stuck on the information highway of Yugo-quality ideas by this latest account. WFBjr rest in peace.
GoatBarn 3 years ago
This sounds like total bullshit to me.
TAMARLANE 3 years ago
Yeah Ron Paul -- the 5% man.
MarkDouglasC 3 years ago 2
Newt wants SOOOOO bad to be in presidental race again. I mean he REALLY REALLY hopes Mccain falls ( and he might). My hunch is, Newt is working REAL hard behind the scenes to help McCain screw up. And Newt would be better at some things than McCain.
MarkDouglasC 3 years ago
funny you should say that...they are both crap choices. Ron Paul...all the way
burnzorz 3 years ago
This guy is so wrong. What America really needs is more Asians.
Showzenfilms 3 years ago
Anything connected with a politician has got to be bad. What lies underneath the pretty cloud? Ya know the so-called wall they are building between Mexico? Well lo and behold Boeing got contracts, Homeland security is taking U.S citizen to court to steal their land..wait..Not the RICH folks that are Bush's buddies where they are getting in on the DEALS. Bush's corporate world has destroyed many lives. NEVER trust a corporation or a politician.
UTBESUX 3 years ago
We need another contract with America:1 Fence the border 2 Enact the Fair Tax 3 Respect the 10th Amendment
thrummer1953 3 years ago 3
good luck with another contract. you see how well the last one did.
JohnMichaels20 3 years ago
last one did fine until Cinton & Co stepped in.Most passed congress.
thrummer1953 3 years ago
who cares? there weren't enacted.
JohnMichaels20 3 years ago
Why close down the Federal Reserve?
wawbwc 3 years ago
Zile77, Any intelligent person wouldn't take the word of Luis Farakan as serious. By doing so you are only showing us how stupid you really are. But by all means run with it because it was entertaining to read that conservative morons will actually buy into this.
Speakerofthehouse2 3 years ago
That's true. Besides, what kind of presidential candidate refuses to RECITE THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE??
synal 3 years ago
The Social security credit card is the only thing the american people need.
This will give the sovereignty back to the people.
We the People, By the People, and for the People.
The People need to control the money not globalist corporates in america.
SCOOTERBALLUSA 3 years ago 2
Who is THE PEOPLE? And whose money do they want control? I agree that the large corporations are a problem but that has nothing to do with social security. Healthcare is a mess because of givernment meddling and because doctors get sued so much. No surprise that the largest campaign contributor is the American Bar Association. Everyone should be allowed to control HIS OWN money and not someone elses. That is true freedom.
mjpucher 3 years ago
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
alroqy28 3 years ago
I agree with you. When Bush ran against Gore in 2000, the liberals screamed about how important EXPERIENCE is. Well, it's quite obvious that McCain (although I don't really care much for him) has more experience than Obama. Notice how the libs aren't talking about experience this time?
Edgehead10040 3 years ago
The only experience that seems to have any substance these days among the GOP candidates how much more are they going to continue to fuck over the american public with the continuation of the failed policies orchestrated by the dumbest and most incompetent president and administration in the history of the United States? McCain's experience is that he is a liberal pretending to be a hard liner conservative.
Speakerofthehouse2 3 years ago
What you said makes no sense. Please look up the word "experience" in the dictionary. Again, your first sentence makes no sense. McCain is hardly a Bush clone. He's to the left of Bush when the GOP really needs to be moving to the right of Bush to traditional conservatism (a la Pat Buchanan). You admit that McCain is a liberal. Therefore, you should like him, since you obviously have utter contempt for conservatives.
Edgehead10044 3 years ago
Wasn't welfare reform part of it? That passed. I wouldn't call the guy a fucking loser. He has a Ph.D. and was a professor. The guy's very intelligent and orchestrated the GOP takeover of Congress in 1994. Where did you get the idea that the Contract with America was lifted from Ross Perot?
Edgehead10040 3 years ago
Actually, a good portion of it was lifted directly from a Ronald Reagan speech, who if I remember correctly, was president before Perot even thought of running. Also, they accomplished what the contract was intended for: to get out in debate and voting a number of Acts. Some were split up and enacted seperately, others never got out of one house or the other, and a few were vetoed by Clinton. Plus, the PSLRA was a GOOD thing, helping to limit frivolous lawsuits.
stumunch 3 years ago 2
almost none of the stuff was enacted, Welfare Reform was edited by the president, term limits failed, balanced budget amendment failed, most else never enacted, it was a joke. nothing but a political stunt that in the end, is a footnote in history.
JohnMichaels20 3 years ago
John michaels u are so right.
Deango2 3 years ago
John, I don't get your argument. Are you saying that it was a joke because many of the ideas didn't pass or because the ideas themselves were bad? I honestly don't know from where you are coming.
Edgehead10040 3 years ago
both, as the only things that ever got enacted from it were PSLRA and welfare reform, which was a Clinton 92 campaign promise anyway.
JohnMichaels20 3 years ago
So what if Clinton promised it? He had no intention of passing welfare reform. He vetoed two bills, and then Dick Morris convinced him to sign one.
Edgehead10044 3 years ago
To JM20--So I take it then that "winners" use the F-word in their responses and fabricate "facts" to fit their viewpoint (which is so much easier than actually trying to understand something)
buzzster99 3 years ago
Quien es este canoso man?
fedeqd 3 years ago
I used to like Newt but now realize he's just another neocon. It's not his business (or the business of the US, for that matter) to created ANY type of world! The world does not belong to us; only a small part of it. We need to leave the rest of the world alone to live their lives as they please, not as WE please! Our ruling class has totally screwed up our country, now they want control of the world. I hope we get commercial space travel soon so I can escape this insanity!
Anntink 3 years ago 4
U are right bro. Like at Newt, he was part of the whole Iraq Iran contra, then he used the money that he and his evil counterparts made from selling those people weapons and sent those god damn mercenaries into El Salvador because he and Reagan didnt like the fact thta the people of El Salvador voted in a communist leader. Now look at El Salvador it has a non communist leader running the show. The old one got out and a new one came in. Newt is evil and I hate when they call him a hero on Fox.
Deango2 3 years ago
Deango, I love how you say "right on, bro" when liberals supported bombing Serbia and want us to get involved in Darfur. If the world doesn't belong to us, that means that ALL interventionist wars are wrong, not just GOP interventionist wars.
Edgehead10040 3 years ago
We want results!
y2rock 3 years ago