We all remember Judi Giuliani - the front runner...how much he got -1% So media do not BS us about your fake polls.....you get paid to lie I understand...but at least - wink ..
LMAO!! Good riddance libtard! Clinton WAS the cause of 9/11 douchebag! He had 4 chances to take out Bin Ladin & didn't have the balls! When our Ebassy's were blown up, USS Cole blown up & the first WTC bombing happened, what did Clinton do?? NOT A FUCKING THING!!!!!!!!
@falcondriver100 If you really want to get into it, Jimmy Carter and Ronald Regan should be held responsible as under their presidency they approved the funding of billions to the mujahideen who were attacking the Soviet Union. Who was a part of this mujahideen? Osama bin Laden of course. Therefore, it began with them. Why didn't they see that the funding of militant extremists would come to bite us in the rear? Also, blaming any president for the failure of the CIA is ridiculous.
@CrazyMastodon Are you that niave? Just like in your life, friends become enemies & visa versa. The Soviets were invading Afganistan, they were NOT "being attacked". LMAO! Soviets were our mutual enemy so its natural we would side with them. Things change on the world stage. In WWII, the Soviets were our ally!!
The CIA didn't "fail" dummy, they had Bin Ladin in our crosshairs several times & Clinton told them to "stand down"! Not very knowledgeable are ya?
@falcondriver100 This is why I rarely if ever get into YouTube discussions. They are full of comments like: libtard, douchebag, naive, and dummy. Insults and condescending attitudes really don't help an argument. I'm done. Insult away.
@falcondriver100 I will chime in here. Clinton wasn't responsible for 9/11. Clinton followed the rule of law, he prosecuted those that committed terrorist acts against us without using assassination tactics that has become so common nowadays. Clinton told the CIA to not attack Bin Ladin because he A wanted him to stand trial and B he didn't want to kill innocent bystanders. Now whether you like Clinton or not isn't the issue, the issue is he followed the rule of law.
@Ryooken LMAO!! Classic shit! Bin Ladin was IN CUSTODY & offered to Clinton. Clinton didn't want him you moron. It is NOT illegal to assasinate a terrorist who has attacked your Country &military & has murdered hundreds of your people.
BTW, was Clinton following "the rule of law" when he repainted US bombers in UN colors & bombed the fuck out of Bosnia, murdering over 300,000 civlilians? Or how about his 30 + "gates"??
@falcondriver100 I am sorry but you are wrong. He was not in custody, they knew where he was but he was never in custody. No, it's not lega to assassinate anyone. Did we do that to Timothy McVaye? No we did not, it's called due process and calling me a moron when you don't understand the basics of the law is quite amusing. Show me when Clinton painted the UN bombers to bomb Bosnians. This should be good.
@Ryooken Wrong, Sudan had him in their custody & offered to give him to the US, thru Saudi Arabia. Learn some history.
So is Obama a criminal for having him assasinated in front of his wife & children? Timothy McVeigh(Spelled correctly)was a U.S. citizen, not a foreign national who declared war on us. Yet he WAS put to death within one year, no appeals. Don't you find that odd when Death Row inmates stay alive for 25 years or more? Due process doesn't apply to non-American citizens! Durhrrr!
@Ryooken You're kidding me right? You didn't know Clinton had our bombers repainted in UN colors to bomb Bosnia? Are you REALLY than uninformed yet have the balls to argue with me about it? ROFLMAO! Ever heard of "google"?? Give it a try & I'll be awaiting my apology, genius! Sheeesh!
Oh, and as far as "You don't understand the basices of the law & its quite amusing"........I've been in Law Enforcement for 24 years & my wife is a Constitutional Attorney. YOU are who's "quite amusing"!
@falcondriver100 I believe you are talking about this. Remember Clinton was fighting to prevent genocide. Here is what happened. At the same time, the U.S. also decided to join France, Britain, the Netherlands, and Turkey in the donation of aircrafts to NATO that would be used in airstrikes to protect the UN safe havens. These havens were set up to protect the fleeing civilians from genocide. Got any more?
@Ryooken LMAO! Clintons OWN General said he was bombing the wrong side! Yep, and he had the planes repainted in NATO colors. He was NOT just "protecting UN safe havens". I LOVE how libnuts word shit to sound like little angels. Just like I said before, you're all full of shit, revisionist historians. Many around the world still call for Ciinton to be tried for genocide. He bombed INNOCENT, UNARMED, CIVILIANS ON PURPOSE! He did it to take the heat off the "monica situation". Defend this do ya?
@falcondriver100 Then prove it. You claim that Clinton was bombing the wrong side and considering that I met some of those people, I would be curious to know where you're getting your information. Here is my source. “The Clinton Years: Assessing Success in the Bosnian Genocide
Intervention”
By Natalie Pierce
You got one? Like I said before making these silly comments make you look so bad.
@Ryooken "Prove it"? Its an OPINION guy! LMAO! Its not my opinion either. If you had any reading comprehension skills you'd see that it was a MILITARY GENERALS OPINION!
Yeah, I'm nailing you with facts on issue after issue while you lie & pull bullshit outta your arse, but I'm the one making myself "look so bad"?? Thats some grand shit right there!
@falcondriver100 So in other words, you can't prove it. Show me where the general stated it. If you had any ethics you wouldn't be posting people's opinions without actual evidence to back it up. That's called proof. Yeah you call what you say as evidence but it's not and what's funny is I posted my sources did you post yours? Nope guess not. :D
@Ryooken No, I can prove it. It was General Lewis Mackenzie. Since you're too damn lazy to do your own research & would rather call me a liar(because thats what REAL liars do), I typed in the word "What General said Clinton bombed the wrong side" into Yahoo. 18,200,000 hits popped up. REAL HARD TO FIND IT! Yeah thats 18MILLION 200THOUSAND! LMAO!
@falcondriver100 LOL! Evidence given at The Hague war crimes tribunal casts serious doubt on the figure of "up to" 8,000 Bosnian Muslims massacred. That figure includes "up to" 5,000 who have been classified as missing. More than 2,000 bodies have been recovered in and around Srebrenica, and they include victims of the three years of intense fighting in the area. The math just doesn't support the scale of 8,000 killed. Like I said before insults only show your immaturity.
@Ryooken LMAO!! WTF are you talking about? You're like a page out of Saul Alinsky's book "rules for radicals". When completely PWND & proven wrong, act like it didn't happen, ignore it & bring up another subject, ANY subject & hope your opponent takes the bait"...........
Oh, shold I have given PROOF of that one too so I can remain "ethical"?? ROFLMAO!
I thought this was about weather or not "An American General said Clinton bombed the wrong side"?? Was it not?
@Ryooken Where did ya go Ryooken?? Just as I thought, you're not man enough to admit when you're wrong. Typical liberal. Run off & hide like the Democrats did when the war got a little tough...........
@Ryooken I even sent you a video with the General saying the words himself, before you embarrass yourself & claim "its just hearsay"........which I'm sure you'd have done. LOL!
@falcondriver100 Sorry it took so long. I was busy. Now let's begin first you claimed that this is about Clinto dropping bombs on the wrong side. Then you stated that Clinton's own general stated this to be true. Well let's recap the General that you were speaking of was not Clinton's general but head of Nato operations. He was Canadian. He also was talking about the safe zone and not us picking a side and bombing civilians. continued
@Ryooken He has since written and lectured on his experiences in the former Yugoslavia. He has expressed controversial views on the Srebrenica genocide, an event that fell outside his period of service in the area. So again let's be clear here.
I have no respect for the far right in the firstplace, what I find really lame is when a nutty far right tries to lie, gets called out, and then apologizes AND tries to place blame on someone else for thier bullshit! ugh its despicable
Could we get some candidates this year with a real agenda on the right this year!? Are are we basicly getting more of this shit!, man Id love to be non partisan again. Where can I buy some substance on the right?
Please keep ripping on michelle. It seems to have the anti-endorsment from nbc is a far better tool to get elected than having nbc, cbs, abc and cnn in the tank for you.
Voting for this idiot before she made this comment makes those voters idiots but doing it after that comment makes them idiotic morons. So if you voted for this dingbat, you are at least an idiot.
Dear God When I prayed to you 8 years ago and ask for you to open Americans eyes on how the Republican party works and you told me if I stop cussing and eat all my veges you would grant my prayer. I just want to say thank you and I will continue to eat my veges. aman
Michele Bachmann is gonna lose the election, thanks to all of the hate she has in her heart..her ultimate mistake was revealing it to the public during an election year. I'm glad to see the bitch go!
This has been flagged as spam show
We all remember Judi Giuliani - the front runner...how much he got -1% So media do not BS us about your fake polls.....you get paid to lie I understand...but at least - wink ..
Len1277 4 months ago
LMAO!! Good riddance libtard! Clinton WAS the cause of 9/11 douchebag! He had 4 chances to take out Bin Ladin & didn't have the balls! When our Ebassy's were blown up, USS Cole blown up & the first WTC bombing happened, what did Clinton do?? NOT A FUCKING THING!!!!!!!!
falcondriver100 7 months ago
@falcondriver100 If you really want to get into it, Jimmy Carter and Ronald Regan should be held responsible as under their presidency they approved the funding of billions to the mujahideen who were attacking the Soviet Union. Who was a part of this mujahideen? Osama bin Laden of course. Therefore, it began with them. Why didn't they see that the funding of militant extremists would come to bite us in the rear? Also, blaming any president for the failure of the CIA is ridiculous.
CrazyMastodon 5 months ago
@CrazyMastodon Are you that niave? Just like in your life, friends become enemies & visa versa. The Soviets were invading Afganistan, they were NOT "being attacked". LMAO! Soviets were our mutual enemy so its natural we would side with them. Things change on the world stage. In WWII, the Soviets were our ally!!
The CIA didn't "fail" dummy, they had Bin Ladin in our crosshairs several times & Clinton told them to "stand down"! Not very knowledgeable are ya?
falcondriver100 5 months ago
@falcondriver100 This is why I rarely if ever get into YouTube discussions. They are full of comments like: libtard, douchebag, naive, and dummy. Insults and condescending attitudes really don't help an argument. I'm done. Insult away.
CrazyMastodon 5 months ago
@CrazyMastodon Sorry I upset you, but if the shoe fits............
falcondriver100 5 months ago
@falcondriver100 I will chime in here. Clinton wasn't responsible for 9/11. Clinton followed the rule of law, he prosecuted those that committed terrorist acts against us without using assassination tactics that has become so common nowadays. Clinton told the CIA to not attack Bin Ladin because he A wanted him to stand trial and B he didn't want to kill innocent bystanders. Now whether you like Clinton or not isn't the issue, the issue is he followed the rule of law.
Ryooken 5 months ago
@Ryooken LMAO!! Classic shit! Bin Ladin was IN CUSTODY & offered to Clinton. Clinton didn't want him you moron. It is NOT illegal to assasinate a terrorist who has attacked your Country &military & has murdered hundreds of your people.
BTW, was Clinton following "the rule of law" when he repainted US bombers in UN colors & bombed the fuck out of Bosnia, murdering over 300,000 civlilians? Or how about his 30 + "gates"??
People like you are hilariously niave & silly.
falcondriver100 5 months ago
@falcondriver100 I am sorry but you are wrong. He was not in custody, they knew where he was but he was never in custody. No, it's not lega to assassinate anyone. Did we do that to Timothy McVaye? No we did not, it's called due process and calling me a moron when you don't understand the basics of the law is quite amusing. Show me when Clinton painted the UN bombers to bomb Bosnians. This should be good.
Ryooken 5 months ago
@Ryooken Wrong, Sudan had him in their custody & offered to give him to the US, thru Saudi Arabia. Learn some history.
So is Obama a criminal for having him assasinated in front of his wife & children? Timothy McVeigh(Spelled correctly)was a U.S. citizen, not a foreign national who declared war on us. Yet he WAS put to death within one year, no appeals. Don't you find that odd when Death Row inmates stay alive for 25 years or more? Due process doesn't apply to non-American citizens! Durhrrr!
falcondriver100 5 months ago
@Ryooken You're kidding me right? You didn't know Clinton had our bombers repainted in UN colors to bomb Bosnia? Are you REALLY than uninformed yet have the balls to argue with me about it? ROFLMAO! Ever heard of "google"?? Give it a try & I'll be awaiting my apology, genius! Sheeesh!
Oh, and as far as "You don't understand the basices of the law & its quite amusing"........I've been in Law Enforcement for 24 years & my wife is a Constitutional Attorney. YOU are who's "quite amusing"!
falcondriver100 5 months ago
@Ryooken I meant NATO colors, not UN.......My mistake.
falcondriver100 5 months ago
@falcondriver100 I believe you are talking about this. Remember Clinton was fighting to prevent genocide. Here is what happened. At the same time, the U.S. also decided to join France, Britain, the Netherlands, and Turkey in the donation of aircrafts to NATO that would be used in airstrikes to protect the UN safe havens. These havens were set up to protect the fleeing civilians from genocide. Got any more?
Ryooken 5 months ago
@Ryooken LMAO! Clintons OWN General said he was bombing the wrong side! Yep, and he had the planes repainted in NATO colors. He was NOT just "protecting UN safe havens". I LOVE how libnuts word shit to sound like little angels. Just like I said before, you're all full of shit, revisionist historians. Many around the world still call for Ciinton to be tried for genocide. He bombed INNOCENT, UNARMED, CIVILIANS ON PURPOSE! He did it to take the heat off the "monica situation". Defend this do ya?
falcondriver100 5 months ago
@falcondriver100 Then prove it. You claim that Clinton was bombing the wrong side and considering that I met some of those people, I would be curious to know where you're getting your information. Here is my source. “The Clinton Years: Assessing Success in the Bosnian Genocide
Intervention”
By Natalie Pierce
You got one? Like I said before making these silly comments make you look so bad.
Ryooken 5 months ago
@Ryooken "Prove it"? Its an OPINION guy! LMAO! Its not my opinion either. If you had any reading comprehension skills you'd see that it was a MILITARY GENERALS OPINION!
Yeah, I'm nailing you with facts on issue after issue while you lie & pull bullshit outta your arse, but I'm the one making myself "look so bad"?? Thats some grand shit right there!
falcondriver100 5 months ago
@falcondriver100 So in other words, you can't prove it. Show me where the general stated it. If you had any ethics you wouldn't be posting people's opinions without actual evidence to back it up. That's called proof. Yeah you call what you say as evidence but it's not and what's funny is I posted my sources did you post yours? Nope guess not. :D
Ryooken 4 months ago
@Ryooken No, I can prove it. It was General Lewis Mackenzie. Since you're too damn lazy to do your own research & would rather call me a liar(because thats what REAL liars do), I typed in the word "What General said Clinton bombed the wrong side" into Yahoo. 18,200,000 hits popped up. REAL HARD TO FIND IT! Yeah thats 18MILLION 200THOUSAND! LMAO!
Am I now "eithical"?? Hahaha. Stupid jerk.
falcondriver100 4 months ago
@falcondriver100 LOL! Evidence given at The Hague war crimes tribunal casts serious doubt on the figure of "up to" 8,000 Bosnian Muslims massacred. That figure includes "up to" 5,000 who have been classified as missing. More than 2,000 bodies have been recovered in and around Srebrenica, and they include victims of the three years of intense fighting in the area. The math just doesn't support the scale of 8,000 killed. Like I said before insults only show your immaturity.
Ryooken 4 months ago
@Ryooken LMAO!! WTF are you talking about? You're like a page out of Saul Alinsky's book "rules for radicals". When completely PWND & proven wrong, act like it didn't happen, ignore it & bring up another subject, ANY subject & hope your opponent takes the bait"...........
Oh, shold I have given PROOF of that one too so I can remain "ethical"?? ROFLMAO!
I thought this was about weather or not "An American General said Clinton bombed the wrong side"?? Was it not?
falcondriver100 4 months ago
@Ryooken Where did ya go Ryooken?? Just as I thought, you're not man enough to admit when you're wrong. Typical liberal. Run off & hide like the Democrats did when the war got a little tough...........
falcondriver100 4 months ago
@falcondriver100 Oh I haven't gone anywhere. When I am busy I don't respond. Be patient I will be with you in a little bit.
Ryooken 4 months ago
@Ryooken I even sent you a video with the General saying the words himself, before you embarrass yourself & claim "its just hearsay"........which I'm sure you'd have done. LOL!
falcondriver100 4 months ago
@falcondriver100 Sorry it took so long. I was busy. Now let's begin first you claimed that this is about Clinto dropping bombs on the wrong side. Then you stated that Clinton's own general stated this to be true. Well let's recap the General that you were speaking of was not Clinton's general but head of Nato operations. He was Canadian. He also was talking about the safe zone and not us picking a side and bombing civilians. continued
Ryooken 4 months ago
@Ryooken So let's be clear about that.
Ryooken 4 months ago
@Ryooken He has since written and lectured on his experiences in the former Yugoslavia. He has expressed controversial views on the Srebrenica genocide, an event that fell outside his period of service in the area. So again let's be clear here.
!. He was Canadian not American
2. He was commenting on the UN and not the USA
3. He was speaking outside his tour of duty
4. He was not talking about Clinton directly and
5. You need to stop this silliness.
Ryooken 4 months ago
I have no respect for the far right in the firstplace, what I find really lame is when a nutty far right tries to lie, gets called out, and then apologizes AND tries to place blame on someone else for thier bullshit! ugh its despicable
Could we get some candidates this year with a real agenda on the right this year!? Are are we basicly getting more of this shit!, man Id love to be non partisan again. Where can I buy some substance on the right?
Ariakas7708 10 months ago
Please keep ripping on michelle. It seems to have the anti-endorsment from nbc is a far better tool to get elected than having nbc, cbs, abc and cnn in the tank for you.
gonadcancervictim 1 year ago
I thought I was the worst person in the world.
Now I'm happy again.
idebeep 2 years ago 4
This has been flagged as spam show
go butt fuk obama and matthews u flaming liberal homo,u politically correct homo minority loving sissy man.
a12colcci 2 years ago
Voting for this idiot before she made this comment makes those voters idiots but doing it after that comment makes them idiotic morons. So if you voted for this dingbat, you are at least an idiot.
hackerblaster 2 years ago 11
The stupid cow won her election. THIS IS A PERFECT REFERENDUM ON HOW WE DO NOTHING AS VOTERS. NOTHING. WE'RE PASSIVE SHEEP.
vsop333 3 years ago 10
@vsop333 Can the Democrats get a good candidate to actually beat Bachmann in Nov, 2010?
TheFrogger15 1 year ago
wellllll looks like bachmann won the election...
anavarro09 3 years ago
Dear God When I prayed to you 8 years ago and ask for you to open Americans eyes on how the Republican party works and you told me if I stop cussing and eat all my veges you would grant my prayer. I just want to say thank you and I will continue to eat my veges. aman
SAILERBOY68 3 years ago 5
Michele Bachmann is gonna lose the election, thanks to all of the hate she has in her heart..her ultimate mistake was revealing it to the public during an election year. I'm glad to see the bitch go!
Loakum 3 years ago 2
That woman was so f'ing annoying, glad to see her (possibly) go.
sighhhhhhhhhhhhhhh 3 years ago 3
Bye Bye Bachmann.
hollyhoodjoe123 3 years ago 5
I hate that lying BI*** with a smile. Michele Bachmann
Post4now 3 years ago 6
The trap she walked in to was her big open mouth
barbyyoung 3 years ago 18
Rep. Michele Bachmann opens mouth, inserts foot!
With feet that big maybe she'd be better suited doing porn...LMAO!!
shaundraivy 3 years ago