The Murder of Meredith Kercher wikipedia article is being used as a platform to publicly prosecute Amanda Knox, by a crew of hostile editors that have interest in Amanda's Knox's conviction, who I suspect are contracted. Jimbo Wales got involved however the situation has not changed much. The truth is still being censored and the word smithing continues to spin the article to present a concept of guilt.
The more I listen to this man the less I want Wikipedia to make it. He is just another business man. I don't believe a thing he says. Especially when in one second he says he wishes he'd made it so he could profit from Wikipedia, and then he runs wikia, which he can profit from. I would rather not buy into it.
@chibiakutenshi He is human ... and human need money for necessities like food and shelter and having fun ... so as well he has to has a source of money ... thats nothing non-ethical here
@16neelloc Agree. That was a bad comparison. I mean, it comes to the main purpose - a party is plain for fun, hence you don't want people you don't like there, thereas a blog is a place for 'work' (discussion, self-development, whatever), hence it's not good to do everything to avoid negativity there.
I read a lot of topics on wikipedia. But my problem with it, being a student, is that you can read and find almost everything, but we the students can't use anything of wikipedia for scientific studies, because we can't be sure that the sources are valid. It is a big problem and I think that I speak on that matter in name of alot of people, with the same problem.
There are problems with Wikipedia though. The fact that you can contribute but that doesn't mean it will remain there. That happened to me. I put a sentence with a reference and it was removed by the elites (aka administrators). That's why I am working on a competitor to Wikipedia.
@PabZ2K You have to understand the rules to Wikipedia you be able to post. They are very pretty indepth, sadly, and this is were wikipedia fails. I hope your competitor has a better method for this, otherwise it's another different, 'cept that it's a bit less checked.
@SUlSEISEKI thats not nice mister
morphix1988 8 months ago
@morphix1988 it's the truth that hurts.
PunkFagot 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The Murder of Meredith Kercher wikipedia article is being used as a platform to publicly prosecute Amanda Knox, by a crew of hostile editors that have interest in Amanda's Knox's conviction, who I suspect are contracted. Jimbo Wales got involved however the situation has not changed much. The truth is still being censored and the word smithing continues to spin the article to present a concept of guilt.
yoyohooyo 10 months ago
Jimmy's eyes...
They could make a Medusa scream in terror.
orly444 1 year ago
his face is pissing me off
ownedncut 1 year ago 2
The more I listen to this man the less I want Wikipedia to make it. He is just another business man. I don't believe a thing he says. Especially when in one second he says he wishes he'd made it so he could profit from Wikipedia, and then he runs wikia, which he can profit from. I would rather not buy into it.
chibiakutenshi 1 year ago
@chibiakutenshi He is human ... and human need money for necessities like food and shelter and having fun ... so as well he has to has a source of money ... thats nothing non-ethical here
cobrafazea 1 year ago
@16neelloc Agree. That was a bad comparison. I mean, it comes to the main purpose - a party is plain for fun, hence you don't want people you don't like there, thereas a blog is a place for 'work' (discussion, self-development, whatever), hence it's not good to do everything to avoid negativity there.
MaryQueenOfChance 1 year ago
waht a delicious male!! hot hot hot!! i want to see he completely naked!!!
Fointainebleau 1 year ago
love the girl...
CamiloSanchez1979 3 years ago
To late, shes already dead !
captachaos 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
If you do not copy and paste this onto 10 videos you will get rich like a bitch !
captachaos 3 years ago
I read a lot of topics on wikipedia. But my problem with it, being a student, is that you can read and find almost everything, but we the students can't use anything of wikipedia for scientific studies, because we can't be sure that the sources are valid. It is a big problem and I think that I speak on that matter in name of alot of people, with the same problem.
verhoogje 3 years ago
You CAN be sure; that's what footnotes are there for.
123IOWNALL321 2 years ago
Nice call on Dow Jones, Wales. How did that work out, anyway? Oh, right. It WAS sold. Nevermind.
Jbuds222 4 years ago
There are problems with Wikipedia though. The fact that you can contribute but that doesn't mean it will remain there. That happened to me. I put a sentence with a reference and it was removed by the elites (aka administrators). That's why I am working on a competitor to Wikipedia.
PabZ2K 4 years ago 7
@PabZ2K You have to understand the rules to Wikipedia you be able to post. They are very pretty indepth, sadly, and this is were wikipedia fails. I hope your competitor has a better method for this, otherwise it's another different, 'cept that it's a bit less checked.
chibiakutenshi 1 year ago