Chavez did not kill one million people for oil with lies, nor 3000 nuclear weapons pointing to every nation in the world, nor investing 700 billion dollars per year on military expenditures, nor intelligent service agencies sending mails with Anthrax Virus to its own population, nor Kings on its constitution, nor Nazi retarded on CNN or FOX news, nor 13 trillion dollars debt.
Most likely the american economy will severely suffer because it can no longer afford to consume 25% of the world's oil. It is inevitable that oil will rise. The producers of oil will redistribute the flow of oil to other parts. The world will adjust. It can no longer afford an empire. I encourage Americans to learn more about the world and their own country and stop promoting hatred and violence. The world doesn't owe you all the oil you can consume at cheap prices.
Fascists dreams of a fascist world led by colonialist genocidal countries are going under. Chavez is running from victory to victory.
It's really time to have a close look at the "so cool and loose" Spanish. One of the worst colonialist fascist countries ever suddenly after 1974 being hip and democratic. lol....
HERE IN CHILE WE LOVE CHAVEZ but it seems like the US only cares about South America when there is no right-wing dictator who does everything in his power to please American companies. They clearly do not give a crap about socioeconomic inequality and the immense effects that the continuous dictatorships they financed and created in Venezuela, my nation and even all of South America have created due to the constitutions that were formed.
Se muere CHAVEZ y lo velan en el palacio de Gobierno. A los costados del féretro hay dos soldados. Aparece una viejita con una bolsa de comida y empieza a poner dentro del ataúd, zanahorias, tomates, lechuga, ante la mirada sorprendida de los soldados. Mientras la anciana continuaba colocando alimentos, un soldado le dice: " Señora, por favor, que está UD... haciendo". La anciana, mientras continúa poniendo comida, le responde:" ¿Qué, quiere..? ¿Que los pobres gusanos coman mierda solamente?"
En su circo megalomaníaco, Chávez se inmiscuyo en los asuntos más delicados de Colombia y rompió las normas del derecho internacional humanitario, que sabe de sobra que son violadas día a día por las FARC. Dejó claro que su intención al ofrecer sus gestiones como mediador para la liberación de los rehenes no era ni altruista ni humanitario. Pues no dejó ninguna duda de qué está lado del lado de las FARC
Y Colombia rompio la soberania de Ecuador al ir ahi con armas y ejercito sin decirle nada al presidente de ese pais. Si Correa, Chavez y el resto de Sudamerica que los apoyo hubieran sido un poco mas belicos, ese ataque que mato a 2 personas inocentes pudiera haber terminado en guerra.
La soberania de un pais no se puede violar asi como nada, no solo es criminal e ilegal sino que pone en peligro las vidas de gente inocente que vive cerca y que no tiene nada k ver con objetivos politicos.
Hey hasta cuando van a seguir llorando el ataque a las FARC en la selva de Ecuador. O es que no se acuerdan que fue a las FARC y no a Ecuador que se ataco. Segundo nadie muere por nada en una guerra. Guerra es guerra y si no quieren correr con las bajas no declaren guerra. Otra cosa sabes por que no se metieron en guerra, por que el ataque fue a Ecuador no a Venezuela. Chavez hubiese sido tildado de payaso si se hubiese metido en el medio de Ecuador y Colombia.
PD: "El k no corrio es porque no QUIERE correr"...y el k no puede? mmm, bien clarita la cosa....
Estas confundiendo intencion con consequencia. Aunque la intencion o escusa mejor dicho, del ataque era supuestamente atacar a las FARC la consequencia fue poner en riesgo las vidas de inocentes Ecuatorianos que vivian cerca. Porque mierda no se contacto al presidente de ese pais? Acaso el ataque era demasiado sospechoso y ademas ilicito como para no decirle?
Sabes una cosa, se ve que por mas sifras que dispares no entiendes bien el conflicto en Colombia. Tu crees que nosotros queremos entrar en paises ajenos de tras de criminales? Seguro que no. En el corto futuro se daran de cuenta el mundo que el Sr. Uribe mientras despresiado por las lloronas de chavez le hara ver a el mundo la realidad de muchas cosas que con diplomacia podra conseguir que miles de balas nunca lo hizieron. No se acuerda cuantas veces se hablo con Ecuador y nunca paso nada?
Sabes tu una cosa, no estoy aqui para insultar, sino para argumentar.
Obvio, que nadie no quiere entrar a una guerra pero eso no significa que un ataque ILEGAL a una nacion soberana e independiente no cambie las olas.
Ademas, por tanto que defiendas el ataque de los militares de Colombia en territorio ecuatoriano, el "datito" de que fue un ataque ILEGAL sigue y seguira ahi, ya que rompio leyes BASICAS internacionales de la diplomacia y democracia. Asi no se puede.
Oh eres ignorante o no quieres apreciar que cuando alguien no te quiere ayudar no confias en el para que te ayude. Haci como Chavez el mas grande de los farsantes le tuvo que chupar el pico a Uribito, como le dice el, dicen que pronto el Sr. Correa tambien tendra que tomar el mismo puesto. Simpre hay que temer el que poco habla. Mira lo que paso con Chavez y tanta mierda que hablo de mafioso, terrorista, poco hombre, ect, ect....
uuuf k irrelevante. No sirvio de nada este comentario, ese ataque fue ILICITO, violo reglas basicas de la diplomacia internacional y ademas puso en peligro la vida de inocentes k no tenian nada k ver.
A ti lo que te duele es que con toda la mierda los volumenes de mierda que el Sr. Chavez se ha disparado de la boca para afuera, Alvaro Uribe ha hecho mas por su pais en 6 anos que ningun otro presidente de sur america. Si fuera Chile el de el problemita, estuvieras cantando otra cancion. NO ES LO MISMO SUFRIR UN DOLOR AJENO QUE EL PROPIO. Haci que bajate de el cajon y no hables tanta baba. Yo respaldo a mi pais 100%, haci como los Chilenos hicieron con Chile/Peru
Tu comentario que Uribe ha hecho mas por su pais en 6 años para su pais que cualquier otro presidente de sur america me parece absolutamente ridiculo. Yo le sugiero que haga algo para parar los abusos de los derechos humanos.
RIDICULO dices? Se ve que no has salido de tu cueva hace mucho tiempo, o tu revolucion no te deja ver lo ovio. Si tienes tiempo paseate por Colombia un ratico y veras que es mucho mejor que pasearte por venezuela o muchos otros paises de sur america. No por que seamos mejores si no por que la situacion se ha mejorado, no empeorado.
VIVA VIVA, liberaron ha dos, PERO HOY 14 DE ENERO DE 2008, SECUESTRARON A SEIS,que ASAÑA TAN ARRECHA NO,y asi pidiendo, estos catres a?,NACIERON NARCOTERRORISTAS Y NARCOTERRORISTAS SE QUEDARAN...H.P de mierda..
this clip aims to show how the US media are not the only ones that say negative things about chaves(which in truth many are lies) and trying to say how the rest of the world is also against him which is not true.
it's has all been very cleverly edited.
and you go chaves and tell those bloody spaniards how it is, We fought for our freedom and don't appreciate being talked to in such a condecending manner, especially by an un-elected ponce of a leader like Carlos.
The fact of the matter is that Mr. Chavez has arranged to be the ass of everybody in the international community. Instead of making sure that his Venezuela gets out of the trouble he has placed them in, he wants to carry around the world with some Castro alike socialist movement. At the end his own people will take care of him, because do not believe for a second that the NO won by a small margin and the FARCS did not get paid for a fail promotional campaing.
Since 80% of all profits are being diverted to other countries without any positive consequences to his people. While his people have no food readly available he can spent the money with other countries.
get your dates straight the oil boom has only been in effect for the past two years and that is the time that he has decided to give it away to other nations trying to buy their freedom. But look where he is spending such funds. Bolivia, Nicaragua, Ecuador and Cuba, all of them are not in the same league than Venezuela. I had business in Caracas and just like me, hundreds of other businesses are leaving. Being Venezolano does not mean that you need to agree with all that Chavez does.
you're argument was that he is putting venezuela in trouble because he is spending a large proportion of the money from oil in neighbouring countries, when in reality like I said he is spending much more on venezuela and it's people than any other president in the last 30 years. therefore your statement was deceptive.
I agree it's partly to do with oil prices but even before prices went crazy he was determined to retake control of oil profits that were already being taken by foreign companies and not benefiting the venezuelan economy.
let's say that he is the all mighty that you claim him to be, then why is it that Venezuela has such an unforgiven food shortages when the income is the highest of all time. Perhaps is because investing such funds gave been diverted to personal policy. The rightfull decision to nationalized certain industries was reached for the benefit of Venz not any other socialist led nation that CLAIMS to be friendly to Chavez (not venezuela).
I didn't once say he was the all mighty or whatever, so don't put words in my mouth. there are food shortages but he has tried to help with this by subsidising food and gasoline. it doesn't help when US led companies refuse to either deal with Venezuela or give them a fair price.
See that is the problem with people like you. Always blame the US for every bad thing that happens to some countries. The fact is that Venzuela does not buy food from the US, but from Colombia and neighbor countries. Colombia being the largest supplier. By the way the price has nothing to do with buying items. Is market price and with the money that Venezuela generates from the oil it should be no problem to pay market price.
PERHAPS ITS BECAUSE OF THE CIA FINANCED MILITARY COUPS THAT RAN VENEZUELA FOR NUMEROUS DECADES...u cant expect a nation to only improve when the territory they must climb is so uphill. U are ignoring history and only looking at what is going on now as if the decisions made had nothing to do with the classism, racism, constitutions and corruption that are intact in Venezuela largely thanks to theCIA and their unecessary intromissions in the affairs of another sovereign nation and their democracy.
You can't be serious. You mean to tell me that all of South America's problems are us created? Please, so you also mean to tell me that those countries did not have any one with balls to confront them? or is it because it was easier for the same people to go along. You short change your own people.
Read the thing again and you can answer ur own question, i never mentioned the world "all".
And yes of course it is easier to exploit and abuse a poorer, less-developed nation than it is for that small nation to fight back and prevent that coup from occurring. Things can always be done by force.
All I am saying is that those illicit coups and dictatorships occured and their legacy contributed to the problems we still see today.
If u can't accept a fact then u are not worthy of my time.
The facts are that every time something goes wrong with any south american country the US is at fault. Why? Those countries did not have any leaders? Please all that stuff is in the past. I dont think there is one country to date that suffers from anything based on those things you claim the US is at fault. About your time, I could care less. This is an open forum, if you dont like it that is too bad.
Yes they did have leaders, dictators, many of them human-right violators who were installed by force in sanguinary and illicit coups followed by dictatorships led by the CIA. I dont think "that stuff" is in thepast just on April 20th, PARAGUAY finally voted off an illicit 60 year old party regime which was originally installed by the CIA.
Chile still has to follow Pinochet's illicit constitution and cannot vote it down because the same constitution gives 50% of all seats to Pinochet supporters.
And you think that the people of Paraguay and Chile were all so opressed that could not take over their own goverment. You are very bias against the US and that is understandable, to certain degree you may be right, but the US has been out for a very long time. Chile has one of the best economies in South America and now with the FIRST Prime Minester I dont think they are doing too bad. Paraguay the 2nd poorest country in SA has a lot to cover, but not due to US but its own people.
In Chile they tried, but about 10k were assassinated and over 20k were exiled.
Chile has one of the best economies to exploit in terms of foreign companies but the worst in SA in terms of socioeconomic inequality. I dont consider that a good economy.
As far as Paraguayans, how r they to blame for the dictatorship that opressed them if they couldnt vote on a democratic election in over 60 years to defeat the dictator and the weaponry, money and military classes given by the US army?
WE SOUTH AMERICANS DO NOT APPRECIATE UR CONTINUOUS CONDESCENDING MANNER OF TALKING DOWN TO US AND ALL WE WANT IS TO CONTINUE THE DEVELOPMENT OF OUR DEMOCRACY THAT HAS BEEN SO CONTINUOUSLY INTERRUPTED BY THE CIA AND THE UNITED STATES WHO FINANCED NUMEROUS DICTATORSHIPS IN VENEZUELA AND EVEN MY CHILE...if u want people to believe ur fascist press then you should also start talking about the miracles these dictatorships have done in South America.
smooth, the cia has kill cheguevara, has kill kenedy,martin luther king, try to kill to much presidents in the world. and if jesus was alive today, maybe the try to kill him. and you think that nice?, that is democracy?
Even more ridiculous is the fact that the racist colonialist white male run media is willing to talk of "king" Juan Carlos as if such fantasies of "kings" and "queens" were a reality...."kings" and "queens" only exist in the make-belief world of Walk Disney (Snow white, Micky mouse, cinderella etc.)..what a joke "king" Juan Carlos is.
The funniest thing is that someone in the 21st is delusional enough to call themselves "king" like Juan Carlos...the only kings that exist are those in playing cards.. the king of diamonds etc.
Racist colonialist white male run societies can't handle the native peoples of the world being independent and free. They want to continue the colonization of non-white people and land and steal their resources (Iraq oil, Iran oil, venezuela oil....).
Notice that all of Chavez's critics are individuals from countries/societies run by racist colonialist white males or countries run by puppets of racist colonialist white males ("king" Juan carlos, president Uribe, george bush, Aznar the jackass ....etc) even the kids shown are the kids of racist colonialist white males.
Are racist colonialist white male run coutries diplomatic as they violently overthrow democratically elected governments in Chile (1973), Guatemala (1950s), Venezuela (2002), Grenada (Bush sr., Iran (1953)etc...? Are racist colonialist while male coutries diplomatic as they bomb third world non-white countries in order to steal their resources (Iraq,Panama,Chile etc...)?
Speaking the truth, as Chavez does, is not un-diplomatic.
In case you have not noticed in your blind ignorance, much of south america is a colony of the former spanish empire. are you so ignorant to think that spanish was the native language of south america? BTW, many of chavez's critics are Venezuelans.
precisely my dear. The racist colonialist white male 5% (mostly remnants from the Spanish conquest) of the Latin American population are Chavez's opposition in Venezuela and throughout Latin America.
The "king" is the leader of the racist colonialist white male "Latins" There are also
some racist colonialist white male media brainwashed non-whites who oppose him in "Latin America"...looks like I'm going to have to educate you in the topic of History.
Venezuela is 41% "white" and 49% mestizo (mixed where 5 to 20 percent indigenous blood runs through their veins)
Venezuela has an indigenous minority, less than 7% where as Bolivia has an indigenous majority. Overall latin america has a white/mestizo majority of 60%
dear, they are not remnants, they are the majority.
According to most sources, about half of the population is of racially mixed origin; mestizos 30% native indian, 1/10 african descent. Around 1/10 is European (white).
you see my dear like I said 5% are racist colonialist white males the other 5% of white are racist colonialist white females.
I also said that some of the non-whites that oppose Chavez have been brainwashed by the racist colonialist white male media.
Funny how racist colonialist white males try to include mestizos as whites when they are outnumbered but as soon as the racist whites are among themselves they refer to the mestizos as "esos indios" = "those indians".
what the FUCK in this media propaganda!!, Uribe ask Chavez for help not on contrare, and Brasil and Venezuela are allies, WTF is this?? and the president Aznar send a messege to his embasy in venezuela to support the cue agains chavez in 2002, and he suppose to be quiet about it?? this gloval TV its obiosly FUCK UP
Socialism is fine when it designed to help people less fortunate. And given the disparity of wealth in Venezuela I can see why it is popular. But aggressive communism is dangerous, and a dictatorship (president for life) is even more so. The constant angry rhetoric and large weapons purchases have scared too many people I think for him to be trusted so completely.
It is so interesting to read your comment and then view your profile. I have long held the belief that LinkTV is not simply a source for information but a player who wants to influence opinions. Selective reporting, the bashing of US media and they mostly rosy pictures that guys like Hugo Chavez receive are some strong circumstantial evidence.
You say I have been brainwashed but you dont bother to offer any evidence to support your opinion. why is that, maybe because you don't have any. I am well educated amigo, go sell your koolaid somewhere else.
You are "educated" by the racist colonialist white male media and the racist colonialist white male "education" system which teaches that the racist colonialist white male "discovered America" which is false.
"America was always here inhabited by its rightful owners the natives.
eh, you say white male as if it were something to be ashamed of. anyway, my news sources are global from pravda to india times to xinhua to fox, so you see, i have a very wide angle lense when it comes to my sources.
maybe since you have an obvious issue with white men, you are the racist.
Only whites can be racist because racism is a power dynamic in which a supposed "superior" race ( the white race as is claimed) has special priveledges vis-a-vis non-white races.
These special priveledges are guaranteed by policies of military conquest and world-wide monopolies of the mass media. I have no problem with the white man per-say, my problem is with the white man's continued opprssion of all non-white peoples.
The term "racist colonialist white male" has to be repeated until it becomes a common saying, because it is very precise in its description of the individuals who go around the globe (the racist colonialist white males)conquering/invading, stealing, raping, killing, non-white people. The racist colonialist white male has been doing this for the last 500 years at least.
Arabs, Persians, and Asians have been doing it for THOUSANDS of years. You need help kid. you have some deep seated hate issues. go get yourself an education. All the worlds problems are not because of white men.
You can't justify the racist colonialist white male present day war crimes and the criminal global system which they have established by referencing to "Arabs, Pesrians, Asians" crimes which happened thousands of years ago.
Chavez lives in our time and he is fighting against the oppressive racist colonialist white male system of today.
crimes like darfur are happening right this very moment, not a thousand years ago. Muslims murdering blacks in darfur for oil. there is no possible way you can refute that. if you do, then I truly feel sorry for you.
My dear, my dear, my dear. Again you have been brainwashed by you racist colonialist white male media. I'll have know, my dear, that what is going on in Darfur is a civil war in which racist colonialist white male
backed forces are trying to ovethrow the Sudanese government in order to colonize Sudan and take the Sudanese people's oil.
If you wan to debate me, my dear, you better stop watching the racist colonialist white male media and do some research into fact based information resources. If you don't I guess you will be educated by me. Which I don't mind.
ok let me say this AGAIN since you seem to be slow or retarded in some way. I watch/read AlJazeera, Times of India, Pravda, BBC, Sky News, Buenos Aires Herald, Ha'aretz, IRNA, Bahrain Tribune. These are just a few of my news/info sources. So your argument is incorrect. It's been fun playing with you but you're not reasonable and you've not made one good point. I have better things to do with my time than to debate racism with someone who is evidently a tenacious racist.
uuuuuuum, suuuuuure, yep beat me. I aquiesce to your superior intelligence and admit defeat. I prostrate myself before you and beg for mercy for I am nothing compared to you, I scorn the day my inferior brain came into existance and will loathe myself with as much contempt as you hold for white males. not.
is this about the referendum for unlimited re-election? cos that passed on 15/02/09. global pulse......you loose! hahahahahahahahaha!
zvelekva 2 years ago
shut up chavez
siaisjack 2 years ago
fuck the king
kisameitachiakatsuki 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Chavez did not kill one million people for oil with lies, nor 3000 nuclear weapons pointing to every nation in the world, nor investing 700 billion dollars per year on military expenditures, nor intelligent service agencies sending mails with Anthrax Virus to its own population, nor Kings on its constitution, nor Nazi retarded on CNN or FOX news, nor 13 trillion dollars debt.
luisbeck007 2 years ago
Respect to Chavez! Fuck the USA!!! USA should get bombed the fuck out by everyone! God knows they deserve it!
faccion 2 years ago 5
Watch Chavez go under as the price of oil stays low. Fat little punk.
ScottInVa1760 3 years ago
Most likely the american economy will severely suffer because it can no longer afford to consume 25% of the world's oil. It is inevitable that oil will rise. The producers of oil will redistribute the flow of oil to other parts. The world will adjust. It can no longer afford an empire. I encourage Americans to learn more about the world and their own country and stop promoting hatred and violence. The world doesn't owe you all the oil you can consume at cheap prices.
IceyPancho 2 years ago
Fascists dreams of a fascist world led by colonialist genocidal countries are going under. Chavez is running from victory to victory.
It's really time to have a close look at the "so cool and loose" Spanish. One of the worst colonialist fascist countries ever suddenly after 1974 being hip and democratic. lol....
shortandtickling 2 years ago
HERE IN CHILE WE LOVE CHAVEZ but it seems like the US only cares about South America when there is no right-wing dictator who does everything in his power to please American companies. They clearly do not give a crap about socioeconomic inequality and the immense effects that the continuous dictatorships they financed and created in Venezuela, my nation and even all of South America have created due to the constitutions that were formed.
VIVA CHAVEZ, VIVA LATIONAMERICA, VIVA EL MUNDO!
mmike01 3 years ago
"Why don't you shut up" - that's what people say when they have no rational arguments.
rspawn 3 years ago 2
hola
kienri123 3 years ago
Parece que antes de salir de Venz el Mico de Chavez hablo con la bruja y dijeron "take it easy". Y no sepuso con mucha mierda.
Imedina806 3 years ago
they only wish they could shut him up lol
kevsmit00 3 years ago
Viva our father Chavez!
scientistrologus 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Se muere CHAVEZ y lo velan en el palacio de Gobierno. A los costados del féretro hay dos soldados. Aparece una viejita con una bolsa de comida y empieza a poner dentro del ataúd, zanahorias, tomates, lechuga, ante la mirada sorprendida de los soldados. Mientras la anciana continuaba colocando alimentos, un soldado le dice: " Señora, por favor, que está UD... haciendo". La anciana, mientras continúa poniendo comida, le responde:" ¿Qué, quiere..? ¿Que los pobres gusanos coman mierda solamente?"
alejogomez100 4 years ago
En su circo megalomaníaco, Chávez se inmiscuyo en los asuntos más delicados de Colombia y rompió las normas del derecho internacional humanitario, que sabe de sobra que son violadas día a día por las FARC. Dejó claro que su intención al ofrecer sus gestiones como mediador para la liberación de los rehenes no era ni altruista ni humanitario. Pues no dejó ninguna duda de qué está lado del lado de las FARC
inteligenciaprimero 4 years ago
Y Colombia rompio la soberania de Ecuador al ir ahi con armas y ejercito sin decirle nada al presidente de ese pais. Si Correa, Chavez y el resto de Sudamerica que los apoyo hubieran sido un poco mas belicos, ese ataque que mato a 2 personas inocentes pudiera haber terminado en guerra.
La soberania de un pais no se puede violar asi como nada, no solo es criminal e ilegal sino que pone en peligro las vidas de gente inocente que vive cerca y que no tiene nada k ver con objetivos politicos.
mmike01 3 years ago
Hey hasta cuando van a seguir llorando el ataque a las FARC en la selva de Ecuador. O es que no se acuerdan que fue a las FARC y no a Ecuador que se ataco. Segundo nadie muere por nada en una guerra. Guerra es guerra y si no quieren correr con las bajas no declaren guerra. Otra cosa sabes por que no se metieron en guerra, por que el ataque fue a Ecuador no a Venezuela. Chavez hubiese sido tildado de payaso si se hubiese metido en el medio de Ecuador y Colombia.
Imedina806 3 years ago
PD: "El k no corrio es porque no QUIERE correr"...y el k no puede? mmm, bien clarita la cosa....
Estas confundiendo intencion con consequencia. Aunque la intencion o escusa mejor dicho, del ataque era supuestamente atacar a las FARC la consequencia fue poner en riesgo las vidas de inocentes Ecuatorianos que vivian cerca. Porque mierda no se contacto al presidente de ese pais? Acaso el ataque era demasiado sospechoso y ademas ilicito como para no decirle?
mmike01 3 years ago
Sabes una cosa, se ve que por mas sifras que dispares no entiendes bien el conflicto en Colombia. Tu crees que nosotros queremos entrar en paises ajenos de tras de criminales? Seguro que no. En el corto futuro se daran de cuenta el mundo que el Sr. Uribe mientras despresiado por las lloronas de chavez le hara ver a el mundo la realidad de muchas cosas que con diplomacia podra conseguir que miles de balas nunca lo hizieron. No se acuerda cuantas veces se hablo con Ecuador y nunca paso nada?
Imedina806 3 years ago
Sabes tu una cosa, no estoy aqui para insultar, sino para argumentar.
Obvio, que nadie no quiere entrar a una guerra pero eso no significa que un ataque ILEGAL a una nacion soberana e independiente no cambie las olas.
Ademas, por tanto que defiendas el ataque de los militares de Colombia en territorio ecuatoriano, el "datito" de que fue un ataque ILEGAL sigue y seguira ahi, ya que rompio leyes BASICAS internacionales de la diplomacia y democracia. Asi no se puede.
mmike01 3 years ago
Oh eres ignorante o no quieres apreciar que cuando alguien no te quiere ayudar no confias en el para que te ayude. Haci como Chavez el mas grande de los farsantes le tuvo que chupar el pico a Uribito, como le dice el, dicen que pronto el Sr. Correa tambien tendra que tomar el mismo puesto. Simpre hay que temer el que poco habla. Mira lo que paso con Chavez y tanta mierda que hablo de mafioso, terrorista, poco hombre, ect, ect....
Imedina806 3 years ago
uuuf k irrelevante. No sirvio de nada este comentario, ese ataque fue ILICITO, violo reglas basicas de la diplomacia internacional y ademas puso en peligro la vida de inocentes k no tenian nada k ver.
PUNTO.
mmike01 3 years ago
A ti lo que te duele es que con toda la mierda los volumenes de mierda que el Sr. Chavez se ha disparado de la boca para afuera, Alvaro Uribe ha hecho mas por su pais en 6 anos que ningun otro presidente de sur america. Si fuera Chile el de el problemita, estuvieras cantando otra cancion. NO ES LO MISMO SUFRIR UN DOLOR AJENO QUE EL PROPIO. Haci que bajate de el cajon y no hables tanta baba. Yo respaldo a mi pais 100%, haci como los Chilenos hicieron con Chile/Peru
Imedina806 3 years ago
Tu comentario que Uribe ha hecho mas por su pais en 6 años para su pais que cualquier otro presidente de sur america me parece absolutamente ridiculo. Yo le sugiero que haga algo para parar los abusos de los derechos humanos.
IceyPancho 2 years ago
RIDICULO dices? Se ve que no has salido de tu cueva hace mucho tiempo, o tu revolucion no te deja ver lo ovio. Si tienes tiempo paseate por Colombia un ratico y veras que es mucho mejor que pasearte por venezuela o muchos otros paises de sur america. No por que seamos mejores si no por que la situacion se ha mejorado, no empeorado.
Imedina806 2 years ago
VIVA VIVA, liberaron ha dos, PERO HOY 14 DE ENERO DE 2008, SECUESTRARON A SEIS,que ASAÑA TAN ARRECHA NO,y asi pidiendo, estos catres a?,NACIERON NARCOTERRORISTAS Y NARCOTERRORISTAS SE QUEDARAN...H.P de mierda..
carlosalcons 4 years ago
this clip aims to show how the US media are not the only ones that say negative things about chaves(which in truth many are lies) and trying to say how the rest of the world is also against him which is not true.
it's has all been very cleverly edited.
and you go chaves and tell those bloody spaniards how it is, We fought for our freedom and don't appreciate being talked to in such a condecending manner, especially by an un-elected ponce of a leader like Carlos.
Juanitotrucupey 4 years ago
The fact of the matter is that Mr. Chavez has arranged to be the ass of everybody in the international community. Instead of making sure that his Venezuela gets out of the trouble he has placed them in, he wants to carry around the world with some Castro alike socialist movement. At the end his own people will take care of him, because do not believe for a second that the NO won by a small margin and the FARCS did not get paid for a fail promotional campaing.
Imedina806 4 years ago
chaves placed venezuela in trouble?
since when?
Juanitotrucupey 4 years ago
Since 80% of all profits are being diverted to other countries without any positive consequences to his people. While his people have no food readly available he can spent the money with other countries.
Imedina806 3 years ago
a lot more money from Oil is currently being invested in the country than before chaves came into power.... next.
that's why the US is pissed because they have no control over our wealth.
Juanitotrucupey 3 years ago
get your dates straight the oil boom has only been in effect for the past two years and that is the time that he has decided to give it away to other nations trying to buy their freedom. But look where he is spending such funds. Bolivia, Nicaragua, Ecuador and Cuba, all of them are not in the same league than Venezuela. I had business in Caracas and just like me, hundreds of other businesses are leaving. Being Venezolano does not mean that you need to agree with all that Chavez does.
Imedina806 3 years ago
you're argument was that he is putting venezuela in trouble because he is spending a large proportion of the money from oil in neighbouring countries, when in reality like I said he is spending much more on venezuela and it's people than any other president in the last 30 years. therefore your statement was deceptive.
Juanitotrucupey 3 years ago
I agree it's partly to do with oil prices but even before prices went crazy he was determined to retake control of oil profits that were already being taken by foreign companies and not benefiting the venezuelan economy.
Juanitotrucupey 3 years ago
let's say that he is the all mighty that you claim him to be, then why is it that Venezuela has such an unforgiven food shortages when the income is the highest of all time. Perhaps is because investing such funds gave been diverted to personal policy. The rightfull decision to nationalized certain industries was reached for the benefit of Venz not any other socialist led nation that CLAIMS to be friendly to Chavez (not venezuela).
Imedina806 3 years ago
I didn't once say he was the all mighty or whatever, so don't put words in my mouth. there are food shortages but he has tried to help with this by subsidising food and gasoline. it doesn't help when US led companies refuse to either deal with Venezuela or give them a fair price.
Juanitotrucupey 3 years ago 2
See that is the problem with people like you. Always blame the US for every bad thing that happens to some countries. The fact is that Venzuela does not buy food from the US, but from Colombia and neighbor countries. Colombia being the largest supplier. By the way the price has nothing to do with buying items. Is market price and with the money that Venezuela generates from the oil it should be no problem to pay market price.
Imedina806 3 years ago
PERHAPS ITS BECAUSE OF THE CIA FINANCED MILITARY COUPS THAT RAN VENEZUELA FOR NUMEROUS DECADES...u cant expect a nation to only improve when the territory they must climb is so uphill. U are ignoring history and only looking at what is going on now as if the decisions made had nothing to do with the classism, racism, constitutions and corruption that are intact in Venezuela largely thanks to theCIA and their unecessary intromissions in the affairs of another sovereign nation and their democracy.
mmike01 3 years ago
You can't be serious. You mean to tell me that all of South America's problems are us created? Please, so you also mean to tell me that those countries did not have any one with balls to confront them? or is it because it was easier for the same people to go along. You short change your own people.
Imedina806 3 years ago
Read the thing again and you can answer ur own question, i never mentioned the world "all".
And yes of course it is easier to exploit and abuse a poorer, less-developed nation than it is for that small nation to fight back and prevent that coup from occurring. Things can always be done by force.
All I am saying is that those illicit coups and dictatorships occured and their legacy contributed to the problems we still see today.
If u can't accept a fact then u are not worthy of my time.
mmike01 3 years ago
The facts are that every time something goes wrong with any south american country the US is at fault. Why? Those countries did not have any leaders? Please all that stuff is in the past. I dont think there is one country to date that suffers from anything based on those things you claim the US is at fault. About your time, I could care less. This is an open forum, if you dont like it that is too bad.
Imedina806 3 years ago
Yes they did have leaders, dictators, many of them human-right violators who were installed by force in sanguinary and illicit coups followed by dictatorships led by the CIA. I dont think "that stuff" is in thepast just on April 20th, PARAGUAY finally voted off an illicit 60 year old party regime which was originally installed by the CIA.
Chile still has to follow Pinochet's illicit constitution and cannot vote it down because the same constitution gives 50% of all seats to Pinochet supporters.
mmike01 3 years ago
And you think that the people of Paraguay and Chile were all so opressed that could not take over their own goverment. You are very bias against the US and that is understandable, to certain degree you may be right, but the US has been out for a very long time. Chile has one of the best economies in South America and now with the FIRST Prime Minester I dont think they are doing too bad. Paraguay the 2nd poorest country in SA has a lot to cover, but not due to US but its own people.
Imedina806 3 years ago
In Chile they tried, but about 10k were assassinated and over 20k were exiled.
Chile has one of the best economies to exploit in terms of foreign companies but the worst in SA in terms of socioeconomic inequality. I dont consider that a good economy.
As far as Paraguayans, how r they to blame for the dictatorship that opressed them if they couldnt vote on a democratic election in over 60 years to defeat the dictator and the weaponry, money and military classes given by the US army?
mmike01 3 years ago
excellent my friend.
WE SOUTH AMERICANS DO NOT APPRECIATE UR CONTINUOUS CONDESCENDING MANNER OF TALKING DOWN TO US AND ALL WE WANT IS TO CONTINUE THE DEVELOPMENT OF OUR DEMOCRACY THAT HAS BEEN SO CONTINUOUSLY INTERRUPTED BY THE CIA AND THE UNITED STATES WHO FINANCED NUMEROUS DICTATORSHIPS IN VENEZUELA AND EVEN MY CHILE...if u want people to believe ur fascist press then you should also start talking about the miracles these dictatorships have done in South America.
mmike01 3 years ago
If Chaves shut up, the stones gonna scream !
You people have to understand the reality of america latina.
alfonsos1985 4 years ago
yeah the cia will make sure this guy has an "accident" hugo chaves lol
smoothoperator5 4 years ago
All cowards get others to kill for them or
they make death threats on a computer keyboard.
chindico 4 years ago 2
smooth, the cia has kill cheguevara, has kill kenedy,martin luther king, try to kill to much presidents in the world. and if jesus was alive today, maybe the try to kill him. and you think that nice?, that is democracy?
alfonsos1985 4 years ago
Esse Presidente do México não podia ter melhor nome, é um cavalo dos infernos nojento mesmo.
Vomityo 4 years ago
Even more ridiculous is the fact that the racist colonialist white male run media is willing to talk of "king" Juan Carlos as if such fantasies of "kings" and "queens" were a reality...."kings" and "queens" only exist in the make-belief world of Walk Disney (Snow white, Micky mouse, cinderella etc.)..what a joke "king" Juan Carlos is.
chindico 4 years ago
The funniest thing is that someone in the 21st is delusional enough to call themselves "king" like Juan Carlos...the only kings that exist are those in playing cards.. the king of diamonds etc.
chindico 4 years ago
Racist colonialist white male run societies can't handle the native peoples of the world being independent and free. They want to continue the colonization of non-white people and land and steal their resources (Iraq oil, Iran oil, venezuela oil....).
chindico 4 years ago
Notice that all of Chavez's critics are individuals from countries/societies run by racist colonialist white males or countries run by puppets of racist colonialist white males ("king" Juan carlos, president Uribe, george bush, Aznar the jackass ....etc) even the kids shown are the kids of racist colonialist white males.
chindico 4 years ago
yea, i noticed that. i like his energy and his values, but he should be a little more diplomatic.
Qeeyroo 4 years ago
Are racist colonialist white male run coutries diplomatic as they violently overthrow democratically elected governments in Chile (1973), Guatemala (1950s), Venezuela (2002), Grenada (Bush sr., Iran (1953)etc...? Are racist colonialist while male coutries diplomatic as they bomb third world non-white countries in order to steal their resources (Iraq,Panama,Chile etc...)?
Speaking the truth, as Chavez does, is not un-diplomatic.
chindico 4 years ago
In case you have not noticed in your blind ignorance, much of south america is a colony of the former spanish empire. are you so ignorant to think that spanish was the native language of south america? BTW, many of chavez's critics are Venezuelans.
maurusting 4 years ago
precisely my dear. The racist colonialist white male 5% (mostly remnants from the Spanish conquest) of the Latin American population are Chavez's opposition in Venezuela and throughout Latin America.
The "king" is the leader of the racist colonialist white male "Latins" There are also
some racist colonialist white male media brainwashed non-whites who oppose him in "Latin America"...looks like I'm going to have to educate you in the topic of History.
chindico 4 years ago
Ehhhh ok heres a history lesson for you "my dear"
Venezuela is 41% "white" and 49% mestizo (mixed where 5 to 20 percent indigenous blood runs through their veins)
Venezuela has an indigenous minority, less than 7% where as Bolivia has an indigenous majority. Overall latin america has a white/mestizo majority of 60%
dear, they are not remnants, they are the majority.
maurusting 4 years ago
According to most sources, about half of the population is of racially mixed origin; mestizos 30% native indian, 1/10 african descent. Around 1/10 is European (white).
you see my dear like I said 5% are racist colonialist white males the other 5% of white are racist colonialist white females.
mestizos are on the side of the indegeous/poor.
chindico 4 years ago
I also said that some of the non-whites that oppose Chavez have been brainwashed by the racist colonialist white male media.
Funny how racist colonialist white males try to include mestizos as whites when they are outnumbered but as soon as the racist whites are among themselves they refer to the mestizos as "esos indios" = "those indians".
The tide has turned
chindico 4 years ago
what the FUCK in this media propaganda!!, Uribe ask Chavez for help not on contrare, and Brasil and Venezuela are allies, WTF is this?? and the president Aznar send a messege to his embasy in venezuela to support the cue agains chavez in 2002, and he suppose to be quiet about it?? this gloval TV its obiosly FUCK UP
Quitenno 4 years ago
Those news have come too late!
ecuadorvideo 4 years ago
Socialism is fine when it designed to help people less fortunate. And given the disparity of wealth in Venezuela I can see why it is popular. But aggressive communism is dangerous, and a dictatorship (president for life) is even more so. The constant angry rhetoric and large weapons purchases have scared too many people I think for him to be trusted so completely.
Morris1962 4 years ago 7
Chavez has done some great things. His attitude was amusing for awhile but it starts to wear thin, at least for me.
roserover 4 years ago
It is so interesting to read your comment and then view your profile. I have long held the belief that LinkTV is not simply a source for information but a player who wants to influence opinions. Selective reporting, the bashing of US media and they mostly rosy pictures that guys like Hugo Chavez receive are some strong circumstantial evidence.
Morris1962 4 years ago
Chavez is a like a cockey rooster crowing and strutting around. his behavior and attitude are alot like Benito Mussolini.
maurusting 4 years ago
Looks like you have been brainwashed by the racist colonialist white male media.
chindico 4 years ago
You say I have been brainwashed but you dont bother to offer any evidence to support your opinion. why is that, maybe because you don't have any. I am well educated amigo, go sell your koolaid somewhere else.
maurusting 4 years ago
The evidence is that you are parroting the
racist colonialist white male media lies heard
on Faux news, cnn, cbs etc.
You are "educated" by the racist colonialist white male media and the racist colonialist white male "education" system which teaches that the racist colonialist white male "discovered America" which is false.
"America was always here inhabited by its rightful owners the natives.
...where did you get you "koolaid" education?
chindico 4 years ago
eh, you say white male as if it were something to be ashamed of. anyway, my news sources are global from pravda to india times to xinhua to fox, so you see, i have a very wide angle lense when it comes to my sources.
maybe since you have an obvious issue with white men, you are the racist.
maurusting 4 years ago
Only whites can be racist because racism is a power dynamic in which a supposed "superior" race ( the white race as is claimed) has special priveledges vis-a-vis non-white races.
These special priveledges are guaranteed by policies of military conquest and world-wide monopolies of the mass media. I have no problem with the white man per-say, my problem is with the white man's continued opprssion of all non-white peoples.
chindico 4 years ago
additionaly, since you have mentioned "racist colonialist white male media " over and over and over again, you are the actual parrot here, arent you.
here, have a peanut.
maurusting 4 years ago
The term "racist colonialist white male" has to be repeated until it becomes a common saying, because it is very precise in its description of the individuals who go around the globe (the racist colonialist white males)conquering/invading, stealing, raping, killing, non-white people. The racist colonialist white male has been doing this for the last 500 years at least.
chindico 4 years ago
Arabs, Persians, and Asians have been doing it for THOUSANDS of years. You need help kid. you have some deep seated hate issues. go get yourself an education. All the worlds problems are not because of white men.
maurusting 4 years ago
This is where you are mistaken my dear.
You can't justify the racist colonialist white male present day war crimes and the criminal global system which they have established by referencing to "Arabs, Pesrians, Asians" crimes which happened thousands of years ago.
Chavez lives in our time and he is fighting against the oppressive racist colonialist white male system of today.
chindico 4 years ago
crimes like darfur are happening right this very moment, not a thousand years ago. Muslims murdering blacks in darfur for oil. there is no possible way you can refute that. if you do, then I truly feel sorry for you.
over and out.
maurusting 4 years ago
My dear, my dear, my dear. Again you have been brainwashed by you racist colonialist white male media. I'll have know, my dear, that what is going on in Darfur is a civil war in which racist colonialist white male
backed forces are trying to ovethrow the Sudanese government in order to colonize Sudan and take the Sudanese people's oil.
chindico 4 years ago
If you wan to debate me, my dear, you better stop watching the racist colonialist white male media and do some research into fact based information resources. If you don't I guess you will be educated by me. Which I don't mind.
chindico 4 years ago
ok let me say this AGAIN since you seem to be slow or retarded in some way. I watch/read AlJazeera, Times of India, Pravda, BBC, Sky News, Buenos Aires Herald, Ha'aretz, IRNA, Bahrain Tribune. These are just a few of my news/info sources. So your argument is incorrect. It's been fun playing with you but you're not reasonable and you've not made one good point. I have better things to do with my time than to debate racism with someone who is evidently a tenacious racist.
maurusting 4 years ago
If you can't beat them make some copout excuse and quit...preety good.
chindico 4 years ago
uuuuuuum, suuuuuure, yep beat me. I aquiesce to your superior intelligence and admit defeat. I prostrate myself before you and beg for mercy for I am nothing compared to you, I scorn the day my inferior brain came into existance and will loathe myself with as much contempt as you hold for white males. not.
parrot.
maurusting 4 years ago
At least you recognize defeat.
For that you can be called an honest man.
chindico 4 years ago