Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)
Link to this comment:
Share to:
Loading...
- Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
or sign in to load a different list.
Loading...Saving...
They both want to shut out other countries soveriegnty, but they are just different on which ones.
They all want to violate Iraq's in some sort of way.
Violation of Iran's soveriegnty is on the table.
Pakistans soveriegnty is in our hands anyway (we really are just taking it back from when we gave it to Mussharaf in the first place.)
And small countries that owe us something anyway are in our pocket- so we can violate their soveriegnty anyday
RationalLiberty 4 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
VOTE RON PAUL
jackfire55 4 years ago
If we keep the strike force in Kuwait, aren't we then occupying Kuwait? Honestly, what's the difference between having it there and having it in Iraq? Why not bring ALL the troops home from everywhere? How can the terrorists recruit people to wage jihad against the evil American occupiers if we're not occupying them?
Ron Paul 2008!
RMMHS4RP 4 years ago 3