92 dodge dynasty vs. Dodge Bus

[brokeskater86]

i doubt that.. vr's are torque monsters.. my 2.o jetta can smoke my dynasty

[brokeskater86]

i doubt that.. vr's are torque monsters

[vipertruck05]

The 3.3 versions are pretty decent, it beat my friends vr6 jetta

[vouspouvez]

the v6 version is still pretty slow lol. i drive one to work everyday. I had an older dodge van(early 80s?) 3 speed 318 v8 and it was decently fast, for a van. Would keep up with like hyundais at the traffic lights haha

[busboy93]

need to twin turbo the nasssssssssty

[thatoneguy1131]

yeah 92 is the 4 cylinders if im thinking correct, i have the 93 with the V6.

[Sviolinist]

All the years came with 4 cylinders or an optional v6, and some years had 3.0 and a 3.3 liter V6. The 3.0 liter V6 was made by Mitsubishi, btw.

[snakesonaplane2]

@thatoneguy1131 V6 was optional since the start in 88, it was the Mitsubishi 3.0 and in 90 the Chrysler 3.3 became the top motor and the 3.0 the mid motor, my grandma has a 93 with the 3.3 and it's got enough to move out of it's way, the 2.5's are pigs, shoulda had the 2.5 turbo as the top motor, who wants a V6 when you can turbo a 4 banger?

[mageac]

@snakesonaplane2 the 2.5 turbo had worse mileage and less power then the v6s did, i have a 93 the 3.0 and the 3.3 was offered, i have the 3.3... it has a whopping 7 more hp then the 3.0... lol

[Thomas868686]

weak, its a 4 cylindres on ur dynasty?

[smearous]

HEY PAUL! MOPAR!!!!!