Added: 4 years ago
From: veryfunnyphil
Views: 361,826
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (1,710)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • The shadows were all wrong in the original footage and there were no stars in the sky.and there was motivation because of the competition, those things are right.

    Lol I enjoyed the last part though made me chuckle

  • Theres No FUCKING Stars....Simple Proof

  • ......so why did we hire a mass murdering Nazi to build our rockets?

  • I first watched this about 2 years ago, and I just love coming back every so often to see the comments people leave. You can tell the people who a) didn't watch until the end and/or b) really need to hit Wal-Mart for a sense of humour. XD

  • @419Films Thanks for coming back, I must say I really didnt think my basic attempt at making a comedy video using windows movie maker was going to cause such a stir, it is amazing how many people think my video is serious, I was brought up on this kind of `Brasseye` comedy so to me its obvious. Only one person seems to have spotted the x-wing very early on in the video, there are clues right from the start that its a comedy! Thanks again for your sane comments.

  • haahaaa in the med of the i was luike wtf loll haa haa 

  • there is no way neil armstrong is a woman....maybe its a woman being transform to a man to .....wait wait wait what am i talking bout...shit there is no way neil armstrong is a woman and the last part of this clip its funny...doesnt sound like an interview at all but a scam..funny bone

  • this is hillarious

  • screw you man just screw you

  • That was real funny of u to post pic of sunita williams and calling armstrong girl.

  • Very funny at da end .posting pic of sunita williams at the end and calling armstrong a girl.

  • Hahahaha! This video is very funny. Nice one dude.

  • @tyfleguitar1987 Thanks for getting it mate.

  • haaaahhahahahaha very COOL ENDING

  • Dont forget Lance Armstrong, Neil´s evil twinbrother who did a moon trip on his bikecykel... with helmet on, of course...

  • Funny!

  • that was a good one

    but my time is better :)

  • shadows @ 329 , the landing gear is at an angle and not straight up an down like the person then @ 348 one person is bending down slightly while the other is strected out 1969 photos NEW ?????????? Dumbass, did I waste my time on you and your Bullshit, I geuss I did, after watching this I feel that I lost brain cell

  • I wasted 6:55 of my life watching this bullshit fuck the people who made this waste of battery video if you think Armstrong was a girl then FUCK you! And don't u think u should watch mythbusters before u speak of this bullshit and put it on damn YouTube bastards

  • @airsoftcentral101 Thanks for the comments, I am sorry you didn't find my video funny, it would seem your sense of humour is very different to mine, I hope you don't base all your knowledge on TV programmes, as you have seen from watching mine they don't always get it right.

  • @veryfunnyphil Se digitate su Google: WE NEVER WENT TO THE MOON troverete un'infinità di siti americani che illustrano molte prove schiaccianti che nessun astronauta è stato fino ad ora sulla Luna !! - Che ne dite ?

    Ciao dall'Italia da Ettore e statemi bene !

  • @veryfunnyphil

    LEGAL NOTICE

    ******************

    I have spoken to my lawyers with a view to sueing you for ten million dollars damages. You assaulted me with this video and I have undergone major treatment after splitting my sides laughing.

    My lawyer suggested I offer you the opportunity to settle out of court so if you don't want me to bankrupt you kindly send your cheque for $10 by return, that should be enough for a couple of beers.

  • @airsoftcentral101 Se digitate su Google " PROVE ASSOLUTAMENTE IMPLACABILI !!!! - ASTRONOMIA FORUMFREE " troverete molte prove inconfutabili che l'uomo non è ancora andato sulla Luna !

    Che ne dite ?

    Saluti dall'Italia da Ettore e statemi bene !!

  • @airsoftcentral101 Se digitate su Google: WE NEVER WENT TO THE MOON troverete un'infinità di siti americani che illustrano molte prove schiaccianti che nessun astronauta è stato fino ad ora sulla Luna !! - Che ne dite ?

    Ciao dall'Italia da Ettore e statemi bene !

  • @airsoftcentral101 Ad Onor del Vero l'uomo non è ancora andato sulla Luna !

    Troverete le prove schiaccianti digitando su GOOGLE " WE NEVER WENT TO THE MOON "

    Se invece preferite continuare a credere che dodici astronauti americani sono stati sulla Luna, fate pure così ! - CONTENTI VOI CONTENTI TUTTI !! ( ...soprattutto quelli che vi hanno sonoramente turlupinati ! - AH ! AH ! AH ! AH ! )

    Ciao a tutti dalla meravigliosa PADANIA e, se potete, cercate almeno di starmi bene !

    Ettore

  • @ettoremazza7, All videos and web sites that have the subject "we never went to the moon" are made by people who don't understand physics or engineering. They are either confused about what they see, or else they are lying so that they can take advantage of ignorant people and sell CD's and books.

    People (like me) who DO understand physics have no need of "believing" anybody. We know how it was done and can prove why the "hoax theory" promoters are wrong.

    If you have questions, just ask.

  • @airsoftcentral101 THnak god i read ur coment!.......even though i wasted 34 seconds of my life!

  • @airsoftcentral101 Ad Onor del Vero l'uomo non è ancora andato sulla Luna !

    Troverete le prove schiaccianti digitando su GOOGLE " WE NEVER WENT TO THE MOON "

    Se invece preferite continuare a credere che dodici astronauti americani sono stati sulla Luna, fate pure così ! - CONTENTI VOI CONTENTI TUTTI !! ( ...soprattutto quelli che vi hanno sonoramente turlupinati ! - AH ! AH ! AH ! AH ! )

    Ciao a tutti dall'Italia e, se potete, cercate almeno di starmi bene !

    Ettore

  • I like how it showed a picture of Star Wars ships xD

  • Coronal Mass Ejection is the smoking gun that exposes NASA lies.

    NASA was very lucky between Dec. 1968 - Dec. 1972.

    We could NOT detect life threatening CME until DEC. 1971.

    Only two FAKED flights were made to the moon between Dec. 1971-72.

    And after December 1972 NASA knew the gig was up.

    NASA has not put a human beyond the safe zone (about 400 miles) in 40 years.

    So the astroNOTs were very very very lucky, not one wanker came back complaining of headaches or any kind of radiation sickness?

  • At 2:27 ff the video suggests that the person being photographed is neil armstrong. It is image NASA5903 available from a number of NASA sources. I wonder why the name on the person's spacesuit says aldrin?

  • apollo cant be fake: it was pland and build by german engineers. thers no need to fake a landing on moon.

  • OMG when he showed the thing with the hammer and feather on earth i was like "are you fucking retarted?" and i was like "wtf" at the part with the woman. i thought you were seriouse to XD

  • OMG when he showed the thing with the hammer and feather on earth i was like "are you fucking retarted?" and i was like "wtf" at the part with the woman.

  • @veryfunnyphil

    Ok, question. You say there would be 2 lightsources because of one shadow is longer right ? Then i say, if there really would be 2 lightsources there would be 4 shadows, 2 for each person. To be exactly, 2 long shadows and 2 short shadows. 1 long and 1 short per person. This is telling a lie to prove a lie. Or maybe lack of smartness. No decision after this video.

  • i was starting to really belive you until you got to 5:34 then you started to tell big fat damn lies

  • Go See MythBusters episode about Moon Landing.

    It is not a fake.

  • I want my 6:55 seconds back, find real evidence not this poorly made hogwash. Ooh wait there is no evidence to back your findings. Learn science and physics.

  • the flag was waving there no air in space the flag would be down

  • Well done. You have no idea how light, gravity, and vacuum work. You're now fully qualified to be a moon landing denialist! :D

    1) Visor distorts the shape of the shadow, because, yknow, it's a curved visor.

    2) Speeding up the footage does not make it behave like movement on earth. Light straps and their arms would bounce more violently in Earth gravity.

    3) Also, the dust doesn't "cloud" like dust kicked up in an atmosphere would. It travels in a clear ballistic arc, as dust would in a vacuum.

  • Here we see Neil Armstrong in this iconic image 2:31 THAT'S NOT NEIL, MOTHERFUCKER! THAT'S EDWIN ''BUZZ' ALDRIN. 

  • 1 thing puzzles me, why didnt the Russian go to the moon?

  • O_O i really beived you until u said "wich he is clearly a woman" WHAT?! ARE YOU FUCKING SERIOUSE!!!????? You expect me to believe that !!! Lots of guys have long hair . But what really suprises me is that in the pictures were they are posing they are in front of a BACKDROP!! You have got to be kidding me ! what people trick their minds into beleiving ... its not even that their just so fucking STUPID!

  • who was fillming

  • LMAO this video is awesome

  • I would like to thank all of you hoax believers for being so fun to prove you guys wrong with real proof. If I would like to thank each one of u individually for being so easy to troll for your false theories because with out ur guys's gullible minds, we would have anyone to troll. So hoax believers, thank u. P.s. to all u hoax believers (u just got trolled:D)

  • WOW! Totally stupid!

  • oh boy....i needed a laugh...thanks....ha ha ha ha ha

  • excellent stuff..I knew Neil Armstrong was a skirt wearing man all along. It was the Nazis who got the USSR to the Moon after Op paperclip. The Nazis in the US fucked everything up on purpose hence having to fake evrything. john587474....you really are a stupid fuck.....are you American...by any chance??

  • Look at the comical Apollo 17 take off footage. A real take off from the Moon would not only produce exhaust plume but also a visible tail for many miles(just like the comets in principle) against the blackness of space due to no atmosphere on the lunar sky. Moonlanding my ass.

  • he is a woman that means he didn't go to the moon wow! your mind has been blown

  • Neil Armstrong was a woman? That explains a lot of things.

  • Haha! Took me a while to figure out this was a joke!

  • lol. just realised. very funny

  • did anyone else think the speeded up bit at 4:02 looked completed NOT normal, this is soooo stoopid

  • - The only evidence NASA has on youtube is from 40 year old footage!

    Q. Why?

    A. Because 40+ years ago there was less technology and people were easy to trick!

    Why do you think there are no recent HD pics/videos to find, except those made so many years ago!

    The TRUE FACT is, NASA staged the biggest HOAX in history!

  • @officialbobthebaldy

    Why do you think there are no recent HD pics/videos to find, except those made so many years ago!

    What kind of stupid argument is that? How could there be recent footage without recent landings? You're an idiot!

  • The most amazing hoax of all time,well said.

  • - The only evidence NASA has on youtube is from 40 year old footage!

    Q. Why?

    A. Because 40+ years ago there was less technology and people were easy to trick!

    Why do you think there are no recent HD pics/videos to find, except those made so many years ago!

    The TRUE FACT is, NASA staged the biggest HOAX in history!

  • ya the appolo landings were fake but not APOLLO! dumbass

  • @Eddyisrich403 Thats right.

  • 100% proof the Apollo 11 landing was real:

    Neil Armstrong's botched stepping-off-the-ladder statement, "That's one small step for man ..."

    If it had been a hoax filmed in a studio, they would have done another take.

  • @prosperomage

    Good point!

    But now you brought it up, the hoaxtards will just say that it was just a ploy to make it seem more convincing.

    It's game over now anyway, since the recent LRO photos. They're all just crawling back under their rocks.

  • Comment removed

  • Retards + total lack of ability to distinguish fact from fiction = hilarity.

  • star wars at 5:04

  • the funniest bit was when they showed the picture of Neil Armstrong with a PICTURE of the moon in the background with his helmet off, suggesting that the photo was taking while he was still in space. WHAT FUCKING IDIOT BELIEVES THE 'EVIDENCE' IN THIS FILM

  • @john587474 me too, me too. Damn, i was supposed to be looking up Budhism...... and now?

  • How come the bouncing astronaut looks translucent?

  • it's a convex surface. this person is remarkably unclear on a lot of things...

  • @kunglek and the reason no stars are visible is because the sun's light is way to intense for other stars light to be seen. Why are people so stupid?

    Here, educate yourselves, use science and not idiotic hoax believers to answer your problems with human advancement.

    watch?v=ym0CtCMX5vQ&feature=mf­u_in_order&list=UL

  • Neil armstrong should be hung for lien & so should all the apollo astronauts !

  • Neil armstrong should be hung for lien & so should all the apollo astronauts !

  • @mrstevoh123 dont you mean alien?

  • In a vacuum things fall it the same rate this is basic science that you would have learned at about the age of 7 but I'm guessing someone of your intelligence never went to school as of now never speak again you are basically an oxygen theif

  • is it possable, and just go with it for a second,that buzz aldread ( dont know how to spell his last name) raised the camera up to take the photo????

  • stupid beyond belief

  • HA,HA,HA,HA,HA,HA,HA!! Ya got me! I took you seriously up until that woman appeared in the story! You guys are hilarious!! BTW...I don't know if we went to the moon or not and, I DON'T CARE! All that money wasted on crap and now look what kind of trouble we are in!! I wish we could send all the politicians to the moon...A ONE WAY TRIP!!!

  • @grassicecream The money we spent on the Apollo missions comprises some of the wisest investments we have ever made in this country. Read about it.

  • @monokhem -- I dunno ... the money we spent on Apollo gave us microchips ... which led to the internet ... and YouTube. Oh well...

  • @grassicecream ahaha with no suits :P

  • @grassicecream I couldn't agree more!

  • Its a troll. Get an axe.

  • this video suuuucks boo

    You dislike this video. Thanks for the feedback!

    Ratings for this video (997 total) 527

    

  • Well, the times they were different. People wanted to beat the russians to it and not feel bad about loosing yet another race. Once that was achieved, the US lost interest and stopped investing in the project. Anyway, if it was an hoax, they did some good work.

  • you trolls

  • it was real, those photos at the end are from a party after they got back to earth

  • I was skeptical at first but by the end of the video, I was convinced: Neil Armstrong is a woman.

  • I like the part where Buzz Aldrin punches out Bart Sibrel.

  • I kinda took it a bit serious, slowly going to the end of the video you simply started to faking things...and when i heard that you said "Neil Armstrong is a women" ...emm...pretty fake :D yet, kinda funny

  • A very strange video! This video is obviously a parody of "moon hoax" videos, yet simultaneously provides evidence that the moon landing was indeed a hoax. I'm not sure which side the film maker is on? lol

  • Rickyd0821.....while I totally agree that the government as well as private contractors are a bunch of lying thieves, however you are not correct about exploration. We have vehicles on marsvand deep in space we have telescopes and scientific instruments that are amazing..... And thats just what we are aware of.....

  • thumbs up if you heard wat kennedy said at 00:35

  • thumbs up if you heard wat kennedy said at 00;35

  • thumbs up if you heard wat kennedy said

  • Oh we went to the moon alright, but this little NASA consporacy is uglier than you think. Remember how far we have come in ywenty years in phone tech, but in fifty years we have not progressed at all. Why, after fifty years, have we not done anything in space exploration worth a shit? there is something going on there. they know something.

  • @rickyd0821 - Improvements in space tech is not measured simply by how far man has got, there are countless areas where huge improvements have been made, from the duration man can spend in space and stay healthy (vital if we're to get to Mars), to the numerous probes sent to other planets and the Sun, rovers on the surface of Mars, the Hubble telescope, the Space Station, the Shuttle, satellite tech etc. The planned man missions to Mars will be made possible by the progress made since Apollo.

  • whoever made it can't even spell apollo right... neil armstrong landed on the moon, get over it

  • i'm retarded and what is this

  • THIS IS BIG USA LIE TO ALL WORLD !

    USA DONT GO TO MOON !

    ALL IS HOLYWOOD FILM !

    EVRTHING IS LIE ! USA FINISH ! USA DONT HAVE COSMOS TECNOLOGY !

    I AM MOCHIAH OF ISRAEL ! I KNOW AL UNIVERSE INFORMNATION !

  • @elohism ...someone didn't take his meds today....

  • PEOPLE BORN AFTER 1970: It wasn't just on TV!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! There were millions who saw the launches from Florida--the single greatest step of the mission, the thousands of navy personnel who saw the capsules appear in the sky and the parachutes billowing, the astronauts climbing out, the scientists who independently examined the moon rocks, the observatories that tracked the spacecraft across the skies, etc. etc. etc. etc. are you calling them all liars? Then you go to hell!

  • Lol

  • @Haaaaaahhhhhhnnnnnn The moon is 3x bigger than America, you tell me Nippon flew over pin point the rover? Try flly over Australia 3x smaller than the moon if you can spot a Ferrari in the out back. Lol

  • Looks normal? You gotta be a beast to jump with that much weight on you at that speed all the time.

  • Lmao, I love that most people commenting either didn't watch it through to the end or just plain don't realize it's a joke.

  • If you people can't spot parody then you really need to get out more.

  • what are some evidence that it was fake.

  • that was funny well done

  • i like how in the 1960s we suposedly went to the moon many times but NASA scrapped the recent attempt to go to the moon because it is too expensive hahaha and all the computers in houston equaled like one ipod now hahahahahah

  • Hilarious!

    

  • LOL you can clearly see that neil armstrong.. is a woman

  • (Facepalm) I cannot believe these wankers don't get the joke.

  • Pull this shit video. It's infinitely harder to fake the landing and keep thousands upon thousands of people quiet about it than it is to just go and do the damn landing, and do it 6 times! And now the LRO pictures of the sites should now, hopefully, put this "moon landing hoax" bullshit to rest once and for all. But I doubt it, so long as there is enough tin foil for these conspiracy theorists to make hats out of. Get out of mommy's basement and get a life.

  • convincing .. .

  • How do we tell the difference between a hoax and a hoax hoax???????????????

  • Some evidence to make sure they went theyr and it are good arguments /watch?v=RRAf91vkMBI

  • You claim to have done your homework but that picture aint Neil, it's Buzz..... But that ruins the "if that's Niel coming down the ladder, who took the photo" thing Troofers have.

  • You are a lier!!!!!!

  • for all those conspiracy theorists out there - if this was faked then why didn't the Russians( Cold War Enemies at the time - whole reason for the space race) call us on it?

  • WELL WHO CARES IF THIS IS A HOAX OR NOT ... AFTER THAT ,11 MEN HAVE LANDED ON THE MOON TO THIS DAY . SO YEA WE REALLY HAVE LANDED ON THE MOON

  • was... was i just trolled? why am i even here... Hmm

  • YOU CANNOT EXPLAIN THE LIGHT SOURCES AND SHADOWS DIFFERENCES IN THE ASTRONAUTS VISOR... IN OTHER WORDS IF ITS ONLY THE SUN ..THEN WHY DO THE SHADOWS VARY IN DIRECTION??? ILL TELL YOU WHY BECAUSE IT WAS SHOT IN A STUDIO HERE ON EARTH!!!!!!! ONCE AGAIN LOOK AT THE SHADOWS....

  • "It clearly shows, Niel Armstrong, is a WOMAN!!!"

    hahahahahaha fucking lol

  • This is my opinion: They had the whole world watching them when they went to the moon, and they had to make sure they could show the world the landing but what if something went wrong with the transmition, they had to have backup footage to show the world if something went wrong and it did hence the mockup footage that was shown to the world. You would of done the same thing if you were incharge.

  • This is my opinion: They had the whole world watching them when they went to the moon, and they had to make sure they could show the world the landing but what if something went wrong with the transmition, they had to have backup footage to show the world if something went wrong and it did hence the mockup footage that was shown to the world. You would of done the same thing if you were incharge.

  • @RedVynil: You miss the salient puns, allusions & ramshackle historical JPL wrap-up allusions; a COLLUSIVE let-the-public-down-gently public relations-PR treatment release ....: it is all there; called by another name: EAT CROW ... Paper Moon: so there ... that is its entire point of NASA sanctioned VID team: obvious enough; play acting. After-all over 55,000 US soldiers died; "The Fog of War" film interview, Secretary of Defense, during Vietnam, Robert S McNamara admitted FRAUD: no penalties!

  • APOLLO 11 BULLSHIT

    NASA IS THE JOKE OF HISTORY

    SINCE 1973 THE YEAR AFTER THE FAKE APOLLO MISSIONS

    NO ASTRONAUT HAS EVER BEEN FURTHER THAN 350 MILES FROM EARTH

    BECAUSE RADIATION IS DEADLY AND THE EARTHS MAGNETIC FIELD

    PROTECTS THE ASTRONAUTS AT 350 MILES.

  • can't tell if trolling or just very stupid

  • I have never seen anyone give their own time to investigate any conspiracy. People just repeat the bullshit people before them have said.

  • Have you ever seen the so called moon landers at their first press interview, look at them, do they look like the first men on the moon? Oh no they don't they look like little boys caught in the orchard stealing apples, watch it for yourself, look at their faces they are a pack of unwilling liars who wish they were somewhere else,, I'll tell you what matey if I'd landed on the moon I'd have shouted it from the housetops, not become a recluse, or a paid, keep my mouth shut recluse.

  • @thecubanism - Which proves you have absolutely no idea of the kind of men who flew in Apollo. The vast majority of these guys were test pilots, you know, guys who put their lives on the line testing new aircraft designs, usually with no ejector seat should something go wrong. These are NOT the kind of guys who, unlike you by your own admission, shout from the rooftops saying how great THEY are ;), these guys are professionals, they were chosen for what they could DO, not for their media skills.

  • @thecubanism Have you ever traveled in space or know what it does to your system, not just the take off point which puts more excersion on the body than anything else. In space you don't have the benifit of the protection from the O-zone layer to keep you from being blasted by ultra-violet rays. Even the precautions they take in providing some protection doesn't block out everything. Your bones and muscles are weakened, and you feel sick. They probably just wanted to be left alone.

  • I believe that we went to the moon. The new sattelites have pictures of the equiptment that we left on the moon. That should settle it. However, I think there was many thinks that were discovered that have been covered up.  Why is our flag missing? Did they find proof of alien life that have been to the moon or was possibly there when we arrived?? Why did we just pack up and never go back? Does that sound like humans or certainly Americans? Have we ever acted that way? We discover!

  • @vicseekman all along i've used the example of vacuum tube valves and b&w bulky television sets with old b&w noisy programs. let me use it here too.

    1970s was an era of vacuum tubes. ic chips were just beginning to be evolved. in this age of iphones, ipads and nanoelectronics, if humans wanted to prove vacuum tube valves and b&w tv were in fact a reality, then would it sound reasonable if we made them again and start using and seeing b&w programs just to prove it was indeed done?

    tell me?

  • lol veryfunnyphil

  • Time to pull this Shit,move on get a life get a girl friend.

  • Time to pull this Shit,move on get a life get a girl friend.

  • if these spacemen reall did go to moone then how come there is not the proof of these thing after all this years ?? ;-)

  • the hasselblad is only pointing down because the astronaut is bending slightly, to take pics straight ahead (of which the are many) they had to lean back slightly. The LM shadow does not go directly behind neil armstrong but in the same direction as Buzz's shadow. I don't know where you get that one from. If it were faked, dont you think NASA would be sensible enough to remember that there is only one sun in the solar system? You've mistaken your ignorance for open mindedness.

  • @tommyboomboom I see, thanks for setting me right on that one, how about the rest of my evidence?

  • @veryfunnyphil

    Exactly

    Why has NASA all been but shut down recently as well?

    Isn't space exploration the next dawn of man?

    Is it because in actuality we can't even land on the moon?

    Is it because almost 60 years later we have made no new progress which would seem strange for a company with a budget like NASA's

    How far has technology come with just the telephone in that time?

    Yet the moon is the furthest we've gone

  • @tommyboomboom This video is a quite unfunny joke and a parody on some truly idiotic comments by David Percy.

    Somebody not familiar with the Apollo missions might take this rather sick joke at face level.

    The astronauts did not wear their space suits inside the pressurised Lunar Module.

  • lol

  • the whole thing these videos are trying to say is that they didnt go to the moon as many times as we think; we did go but they are lying about certain facts about what happened

  • @hellsingij No. We never left low earth orbit in the apollo craft. Why? Gamma ray bursts are just one of the reasons. The energy in a gamma ray burst is equal to a sun's 10 billion year life span compacted into a few seconds or minutes. These gamma ray bursts come from every direction in space every second of the day. There is no way the apollo craft could have survived a hit from a gamma ray burst. End of story. Look up gamma ray burst in wikipedia or the dictionary. Shocking facts.

  • @Daddyo930 you sir are a dumbass. Did you even read the wikipedia article that you quoted? Yes it says that gamma bursts occur at the rate of about one per day, BUT they occur in OTHER FREAKIN GALAXIES!!!! The only gamma bursts that would have any affect on the earth would be the ones that happened in our galaxy. Gamma ray bursts occur in our galaxy at the rate of one every 100,000 to 1,000,000 years. You sir are a complete idiot.

  • @Daddyo930

    If Ap 11 is fake then all the Apollo missions that claimed to have left orbit are fake.

    My problems are:

    1. no blasting of dust away from the exhause

    2. the camera "remotely operated from earth" that panned up as the lunar lander lifted off.

    Now, if you have a camera on the moon and a monitor on earth, how long does it take the signal to reach you...5..7...10 seconds? So how can someone on earth keep up with the motion of the lift off?

    That's my smoking gun.

  • @Daddyo930 Did you even read the article on wiki. It talks about how rare they are and how they are related to the death of a star. Our sun has not died therefore it has produced 0 GRB. Most of the examined bursts they have noted come from very distant galaxies. Meaning not in the MIlky Way. And in order for a GRB to have any effect it would have to aimed directly at the Earth. And the odds of that happening are very distant.

  • @Daddyo930 And to finish up, gamma ray radiation doesn't effect non-animate material, it would be heat that would do it. Radiation affects living tissue and organisms. The article says that Long GRB are so rare they only occure once every 100,000 to 1,000,000 years. That's Earth Years.

  • Proof is was a hoax is in the fact that Neil could not play the trumpet and Buzz Aldrins wife would never have let him go down to the moon on his own with a woman.

    (Fighting rubbish with rubbish)

  • Moon-landing-is-a-hoax.The-one­-thing-that-says-this-is-the-f­act-these-guys-weighing-thirty­-pounds-on-the-moon-are-jumpin­g-in-the-air-and-floating-like­-they-weigh-one-gram.Does-1/6t­h-the-gravity-mean-you-float-l­ike-a-feather?Plus-why-do-they­-keep-jumping-around?Why-won't­-they-walk-normal?They-keep-ju­mping-around-like-children.

  • 5:53

    "Neil Armstrong.... is a woman"

  • A message for proper conspiracy nerds.....If you think this was a hoax you're a RETARD and there is no hope for you, you sorry arsed cretinous scab on the face of humanity.

  • A message for proper conspiracy nerds.....If you think this was a hoax you're a RETARD and there is no hope for you, you sorry arsed cretinous scab on the face of humanity.

  • @TravellerFellow Very simple. The radiation isn't so intense and lethal as the "hoax-believers" try to tell You. Staying inside the van Allen belts for a longer time is dangerous, but to just pass through them. Outside the belts there is no intense radiation, if not a MAJOR solar eruption is going on.

    The spaceships walls and the spacesuits were sufficient protection for the few days the astronauts were in space and on the Moon.

  • @TravellerFellow Very simple. The radiation isn't so intense and lethal as the "hoax-believers" try to tell You. Staying inside the van Allen belts for a longer time is dangerous, but to just pass through them. Outside the belts there is no intense radiation, if not a MAJOR solar eruption is going on.

    The spaceships walls and the spacesuits were sufficient protection for the few days the astronauts were in space and on the Moon.

  • BAHAHAHA! This guys so funny, he deserves his own tv show. Wait, he was being serious? let me laugh eve harder, BAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

  • Bullshit

  • "The results were astounding!" 

    Uh, the feather hit the ground after the hammer...even though they started much closer to the ground than in the Apollo 15 video! LOL

  • @LunarTuner. That's it? One point, I guess I win then with the rest of my evidence.

  • @veryfunnyphil, well, okay. The rest of it is truly astounding. I mean, who can argue with the matter of Neil Armstrong's makeup?

  • @LunarTuner Man landed on the moon in 1969. END OF STORY, the guy narrating may sound intelligent, but his research is ABSOLUTELY SHITE, unlike a torch or flashlight, light DOES NOT TRAVEL IN STRAIGHT LINES IN SPACE. he is talikg so much SHITE.

  • Ha, very funny.

  • They now have close up pictures of the moon and you can see the lander and the things they left on the moon. LOL

    Time to pull this crap video.

  • @gregrutz I'd like some evidence for that, since we proved like one month ago the flag and all the other stuff was nowhere to be found.

  • @gregrutz Amazing how they found that needle in a haystack don't ya think?

  • @gregrutz

    Again consider the source of those photos

    Unless you can take these photos for your self assume nothing

    Though this video is just a joke

  • Took me disturbingly long to work out that this was a spoof. Very funny.