I think 747-800 is a cheap and boring replacement for the classic 747-400 series in my minds eye. Boeing did not want to invest in all new 747 replacement as it was seen as too risky a buisness venture. I applaud Airbus once again for taking the risk and pushing the envelope in terms of innovation and design technologies. I think Airbus have pushed aviation 20 years into the future whereas Boeing are still tinkering with a 1960s 747 design.
@fachy1981 Cheap? Not exactly. The -8i came with a hefty price to create, even if it's "just" a redesign. And, in addition, the -8i was Boeing's swansong for the 747. They had to do it. That being said, their "big investment" was the 787. You want Boeing to embark on two big investments at once? After the 787 settles in, they'll start on their next new project. The 737/757 replacement or 747/777 replacement.
@civicmind08 me too. Actually, I miss all of nwa. I used to fly their A320's, A319's, 757's, etc all the time. Probably 3 or 4 flights a year. It was such a good airline.
Majority of the media is getting the information on the joining of the two airlines wrong. Delta did not purchase/take-over Northwest, it was/is a merger. It ended up being decided to take the Delta name over Northwest so many assumed it was a take over by Delta.
Now that's a hub of NWA
Themariokartfan2000 1 month ago
looked like NWAs whole 747 fleet was parket at NRT that day :-)
ua462hd 1 year ago
no airport can compare to narita when it comes to countless 747s! just like no city can beat nyc when it comes to countless buildings!
TheArthurAndersen 2 years ago 2
I think 747-800 is a cheap and boring replacement for the classic 747-400 series in my minds eye. Boeing did not want to invest in all new 747 replacement as it was seen as too risky a buisness venture. I applaud Airbus once again for taking the risk and pushing the envelope in terms of innovation and design technologies. I think Airbus have pushed aviation 20 years into the future whereas Boeing are still tinkering with a 1960s 747 design.
fachy1981 2 years ago
@fachy1981 Cheap? Not exactly. The -8i came with a hefty price to create, even if it's "just" a redesign. And, in addition, the -8i was Boeing's swansong for the 747. They had to do it. That being said, their "big investment" was the 787. You want Boeing to embark on two big investments at once? After the 787 settles in, they'll start on their next new project. The 737/757 replacement or 747/777 replacement.
scaremengaviation 7 months ago
I miss all those NWA 747's I use to see at Narita
civicmind08 2 years ago 2
@civicmind08 me too. Actually, I miss all of nwa. I used to fly their A320's, A319's, 757's, etc all the time. Probably 3 or 4 flights a year. It was such a good airline.
DNETV 1 year ago
Ah, the good ole days at NRT...I miss the 200's.
fgassit 2 years ago
I used to see NW 747-200s at Detroit.
PLANEMANGROY 2 years ago
does that plane have tvs on the back of the seats for economy? plz reply!!
PeaceLoveHope97 2 years ago
I was surprised to see one of the 200s landing today at MSP.
jwags60 2 years ago
NWA now not operating 747-200B anymore they use 747-400 nonstop to tokyo-detroit city
cx744 2 years ago
@cx744 Why would any airline fly from such a great city like Tokyo to such a toilet like Detroit? That doesn't make sense.
pete5668 1 year ago
Just for the record...
Majority of the media is getting the information on the joining of the two airlines wrong. Delta did not purchase/take-over Northwest, it was/is a merger. It ended up being decided to take the Delta name over Northwest so many assumed it was a take over by Delta.
mgrunber 2 years ago
Thanks for that correction - I've put it in the liner notes.
sparkingwave 2 years ago
thats dumb northwest is way better
Andrewfly24 2 years ago
they still have 200s in service?
pistonsrule50 3 years ago
they have two.. both used for charters.. however, have seen them used for revenue service, if needed.
ullmanman 3 years ago