I couldn't get over the beginning, it was especially harshly played. This is one of the few times I have stopped a Horowitz video because I didn't like it.
let's not forget the composer in all of this. Horowitz was a superb pianist, to be sure, but he was lucky to have compositions such as this whereby he could display his technical skill (Which, by the way, he allowed to eclipse any artistry that he may have had). Lets see if we can wow the audience some more by playing even faster......like a dancing bear aping for quarters, let's prostitute our art for a few pieces of silver. Shame...he could have been REALLY great.
Horowitz interpretations of Western Romantic composers' works are usually fascinating and often quite powerful as this one is. I find, though, that Horowitz's performances lack the majestic nobility and gravitas that Arturo Benedetti Michelangeli or Vladimir Sofronitsky bring to their interpretations, especially of Chopin. Still, he is an invaluable musical phenomenon. Long live Horowitz!
@streek23 Horowitz is the greatest Chopin interpreter IMO, along with Gilels and Rachmaninoff though there are very few Chopin pieces performed by Rach, and we can not forget Rubinstein :-))
It's sad to see the racist scum commenting here, even in their "tags", the "person" above.
@freeqwerqwer Yes, that is a brilliant description. I know exactly what you mean. Haha! I find all of his chopin playing to be like that but then I find his Rachmaninov and Beethoven to be very beautiful.
If it suffers from anything, it's too controlled, interestingly enough. The greatest performances of the Ballades tend to have an improvised quality. This is great performance, but a little too calculated for me.
The best version I've heard of this was by Soyeon Lee in the semifinals from the 2006 Esther Honens competition. She palyed it like I imagined Chopin would have on his best day. Horowitz, if he doesn't play it the way I think it should be, always gives an interesting and educational interpretation. He was a master instructor through all his interpretations.
the aesthetic sense of beautiful music back then was different than we expect it nowadays from pianists. this is still one of the most melancholic and yet so cryable piece about joy and happines.
Nobody could spin those bravura passages at the end of a Chopin ballad into a wall of sound quite the same way that Horowitz could. Sound, in his hands, became a Tsunami.
What is with all this commenting and debating and comparing. Just listen to the damn piece, this is breathtakingly beautiful. Chopin was such a genius...
This piece has such great emotion, it to me has its ups and downs throughout the song that help relate to to the turmoils and happiness in life itself. Chopin truly was a master composer.
I do not know what this performance is more boring or weird. No doubt that both qualities are in abundance here, but which one is more prominent remains an open question. Perhaps answer to it is a matter of taste, which we should not argue about, but one thing is absolutely clear. This music is too complex for Horowitz and far beyond his musical grasp.
I am sorry but instead of being the ignoramus person you are, try to understand that there is nothing too complex for Horowitz, or for that matter, anyone; it's just that his interpretations might be a little obscured to the ordinary listener. Boring? Not at all. Weird? Maybe in its own essence. But this is definitely vintage Horowitz.
Although I do prefer the First Ballade over the fourth, I must disagree that this piece is too boring and strange. Horowitz does this piece justice (perhaps not as well as Zimerman, but still!) and this is one of the most beautiful, emotional, and heartfelt pieces ever written. Like all of Chopin's works, it has a degree of... distance from the works of other composers, but is made even more beautiful by that. Boring it is not.
I don't know whether you are an idiot or a jackass. No doubt that both qualities are in abundance in you.
This is the problem with youtube, you get fantastic and legendary recordings of these pieces and it could be a great recourse for an artist, but then an idiot like you is allowed to express his stupid opinions.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Take it easy, Rouzbeht, my man. I did not know that is was "fantastic and legendary" performance. Had I known that, I would have never written my comment. I am entirely with you, bro, when it comes to dissing fantastic and legendary stuff, and believe that YT should ban such blasphemous opinions like mine. Yes, it is sad; I share your grief. Peace :-)
sense of climax is unbelievable, altho in my opinion, it couldve shouldve been faster, but thats just me. undeniable ability. amazing and all those other words. BRAVO!
and 1:50 to 2:11 IS like a dream! i havnt heard anyone equal this sense of drama, altho rachmaninov was good in his very climatic way also.
we dont have a recording of ballade 4 from the Rach do we?
! almost forgot about Cortot! amazing musicality, sometimes i think he doesnt have the skill to fulfil his mind, as which one of us do?! but AMAZING! sense of musicality in almost every direction. something i find no equal for today. I hope God resurrects these fine men so they can all play again!
the way he does 1:50 to 2:11 is brilliant. to me that part should sound like dream, and he evokes this by becoming quieter and using more pedal. then from 2:20 on it sounds like waking from a dream, then at 2:45 there is a gradual rise in intensity and clarity.
Tipical Vladimir... I am a whitness of his performances. Twice. Amsterdam 1985 and the year after. Concertgebouw. The queen was sitting in front of me, Karel Appel the painter next to me. I was mezmerized.
god i wish this was a better recording... he's so brilliant!
pinkfloyddwc 3 weeks ago
what is up with the jew thing?
jdhasey 4 weeks ago
what's the jew thing?
jdhasey 4 weeks ago
Beautiful music and recording. Thank you for posting.
Chopibeetho 2 months ago
How very precious and beautiful!!
straycat316 5 months ago
Absurdly awesome.
olivleonardo 9 months ago
горовиц -лучший в исполнении этой баллады !
561marina 11 months ago
Awesome.
forgottenbooks 1 year ago
I couldn't get over the beginning, it was especially harshly played. This is one of the few times I have stopped a Horowitz video because I didn't like it.
thisismeplusyou 1 year ago
let's not forget the composer in all of this. Horowitz was a superb pianist, to be sure, but he was lucky to have compositions such as this whereby he could display his technical skill (Which, by the way, he allowed to eclipse any artistry that he may have had). Lets see if we can wow the audience some more by playing even faster......like a dancing bear aping for quarters, let's prostitute our art for a few pieces of silver. Shame...he could have been REALLY great.
sgivas 1 year ago
Horowitz interpretations of Western Romantic composers' works are usually fascinating and often quite powerful as this one is. I find, though, that Horowitz's performances lack the majestic nobility and gravitas that Arturo Benedetti Michelangeli or Vladimir Sofronitsky bring to their interpretations, especially of Chopin. Still, he is an invaluable musical phenomenon. Long live Horowitz!
streek23 1 year ago
@streek23 Horowitz is the greatest Chopin interpreter IMO, along with Gilels and Rachmaninoff though there are very few Chopin pieces performed by Rach, and we can not forget Rubinstein :-))
It's sad to see the racist scum commenting here, even in their "tags", the "person" above.
Bret6464 1 year ago
too much ego and eccentricities in his playing. I don't know why people extol him as a genius of the keyboard. He plays almost like a crack addict.
freeqwerqwer 1 year ago
@freeqwerqwer Yes, that is a brilliant description. I know exactly what you mean. Haha! I find all of his chopin playing to be like that but then I find his Rachmaninov and Beethoven to be very beautiful.
steamednotfried 1 year ago
@freeqwerqwer
it's called passion, and Horowitz' interpretation of this has a lot of it
thecouchonfire 1 year ago
If it suffers from anything, it's too controlled, interestingly enough. The greatest performances of the Ballades tend to have an improvised quality. This is great performance, but a little too calculated for me.
hophmi 1 year ago
@hophmi Perhaps the last thing Horowitz ever did in his playing is calculating..
iplongnin 1 year ago
It makes me cry ;(
camomileeee 1 year ago
I think this playing is a feast of miss touching.
saintvingt 1 year ago
The best version I've heard of this was by Soyeon Lee in the semifinals from the 2006 Esther Honens competition. She palyed it like I imagined Chopin would have on his best day. Horowitz, if he doesn't play it the way I think it should be, always gives an interesting and educational interpretation. He was a master instructor through all his interpretations.
refrmcetsryt 1 year ago
I prefer Rubinstein's version. Horowitz is great, but sometimes he just plays too fast.
skeltube 1 year ago
Just amazing
ultracoolhomies 1 year ago 5
best version ever!
itamararbell 2 years ago
This is simply amazing.
mindovermattjr 2 years ago
Comment removed
ultracoolhomies 2 years ago
When you get used to hearing a particular version, you compare that version with the others and that is all.
juampixx 2 years ago 3
This is like a "ballade" has to sound like, as well as Chopin.
Appassionata90 2 years ago
the aesthetic sense of beautiful music back then was different than we expect it nowadays from pianists. this is still one of the most melancholic and yet so cryable piece about joy and happines.
semme01 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
this is not chopin . The playing is too ideosytncratic
freeqwerqwer 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I have a nose, I can smell anything i want in music then...
aiuhepdos 2 years ago
Just because Horowitz is an icon doesn't mean he is the best... go figure...
aiuhepdos 2 years ago
I think this sounds to messy... Zimmerman has the best for sure.
aiuhepdos 2 years ago
if Zimmerman was recorded with the same equipment as this recording was(1949) he have been sounded not less messy :)
Elicgt 2 years ago 3
One of the most beautiful pieces of music ever.
FaithIsAnnoyed 2 years ago 14
Nobody could spin those bravura passages at the end of a Chopin ballad into a wall of sound quite the same way that Horowitz could. Sound, in his hands, became a Tsunami.
keelan111 2 years ago 4
This has been flagged as spam show
He has half penis!
horowitzitsfukingJEW 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
he had* lol
horowitzitsfukingJEW 2 years ago
@horowitzitsfukingJEW actually, u had it all wrong...hes really good, first of all, second, actually, he isnt a jew
audreyhsux5727 4 months ago
@audreyhsux5727 Horowitz isn't a Jew? Both his parents were Jews, he was a Jew. WTF??
8Ho03EdONl1liL 4 months ago
@8Ho03EdONl1liL no, actually he was an atheist...his (still alive) tuner said so, at least ^^ but rubinstein is definitely a jew
audreyhsux5727 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@horowitzitsfukingJEW
The other half is in your mothers mouth.
The55555SSSSS 1 year ago 14
This has been flagged as spam show
Fuking Jew. :)
horowitzitsfukingJEW 2 years ago
Comment removed
The55555SSSSS 1 year ago
What is with all this commenting and debating and comparing. Just listen to the damn piece, this is breathtakingly beautiful. Chopin was such a genius...
robthekang 3 years ago 6
This piece has such great emotion, it to me has its ups and downs throughout the song that help relate to to the turmoils and happiness in life itself. Chopin truly was a master composer.
JspekRex 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I do not know what this performance is more boring or weird. No doubt that both qualities are in abundance here, but which one is more prominent remains an open question. Perhaps answer to it is a matter of taste, which we should not argue about, but one thing is absolutely clear. This music is too complex for Horowitz and far beyond his musical grasp.
mltube 3 years ago
I am sorry but instead of being the ignoramus person you are, try to understand that there is nothing too complex for Horowitz, or for that matter, anyone; it's just that his interpretations might be a little obscured to the ordinary listener. Boring? Not at all. Weird? Maybe in its own essence. But this is definitely vintage Horowitz.
RSFREAK969 3 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
That should explain it, RSFREAK, me being an ordinary listener. Thanks for clearing this out. I just thought it was rather clueless interpretation.
mltube 3 years ago
Although I do prefer the First Ballade over the fourth, I must disagree that this piece is too boring and strange. Horowitz does this piece justice (perhaps not as well as Zimerman, but still!) and this is one of the most beautiful, emotional, and heartfelt pieces ever written. Like all of Chopin's works, it has a degree of... distance from the works of other composers, but is made even more beautiful by that. Boring it is not.
FredilYupigo 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
It is not the ballade itslef, which is boring, Fredil.
mltube 3 years ago
I don't know whether you are an idiot or a jackass. No doubt that both qualities are in abundance in you.
This is the problem with youtube, you get fantastic and legendary recordings of these pieces and it could be a great recourse for an artist, but then an idiot like you is allowed to express his stupid opinions.
It's just very very sad.
Rouzbeht 3 years ago 23
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Take it easy, Rouzbeht, my man. I did not know that is was "fantastic and legendary" performance. Had I known that, I would have never written my comment. I am entirely with you, bro, when it comes to dissing fantastic and legendary stuff, and believe that YT should ban such blasphemous opinions like mine. Yes, it is sad; I share your grief. Peace :-)
mltube 3 years ago
You guys are silly.
ThomasMusicWizz 2 years ago 3
Like an old professor used to say to me: Opinions are like noses, we all have them, and they smell!!
Liblibido 2 years ago
@Rouzbeht idk who the comment was to but i know exactly what you mean. for someone who doesnt know any better it could really distort their judgement
anonymousQ45 1 year ago
5:33 following sounds nice :) i like those
SerpienteMX 3 years ago
Finalmente la parte intermedia della ballata mostra il suo meraviglioso senso musicale grazie ad Horovitz. L'intera interpretazione è meravigliosa.
DERFNAM72 3 years ago
hey, thanks for putting this up. i think it's the best of chopin's ballads and one of the best interpretations.
flamingcookbook 3 years ago
Increible Maestro!ESPECTACULAR INTERPRETACION!POR DIOS!
quelindaqueeslavida 3 years ago
magnifica interpretacion. que gran interprete expresa mucho
enak1989 3 years ago
Have you heard Pollini? He's not bad ;)
K189T 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Horowitz is very understood. he have bads idias for inspretion mostly on Chopin Music
Rahav033 3 years ago
To understand horowitz, one has to have basic training and instinct
funeverestfun 3 years ago
The Most Un Good Brilliant Playing .
RomanticNotes 3 years ago
sense of climax is unbelievable, altho in my opinion, it couldve shouldve been faster, but thats just me. undeniable ability. amazing and all those other words. BRAVO!
and 1:50 to 2:11 IS like a dream! i havnt heard anyone equal this sense of drama, altho rachmaninov was good in his very climatic way also.
we dont have a recording of ballade 4 from the Rach do we?
SCHneiDen777 3 years ago
Sadly... no there isn't.
Another recording that should be heard is Alfred Cortot's, although I think it's quite different from Horowitz's.
RabidCh 3 years ago
! almost forgot about Cortot! amazing musicality, sometimes i think he doesnt have the skill to fulfil his mind, as which one of us do?! but AMAZING! sense of musicality in almost every direction. something i find no equal for today. I hope God resurrects these fine men so they can all play again!
SCHneiDen777 3 years ago
the way he does 1:50 to 2:11 is brilliant. to me that part should sound like dream, and he evokes this by becoming quieter and using more pedal. then from 2:20 on it sounds like waking from a dream, then at 2:45 there is a gradual rise in intensity and clarity.
lizziemarie17 3 years ago
This picture reminds of the times I was little and I went through my grandma's things and found weird pictures, some painted like this one.
OorvakanSar 3 years ago
Tipical Vladimir... I am a whitness of his performances. Twice. Amsterdam 1985 and the year after. Concertgebouw. The queen was sitting in front of me, Karel Appel the painter next to me. I was mezmerized.
Robert from the Netherlands.
bigfrisian 4 years ago 2
SOOooo handsome....
goobleglob 4 years ago 2
Absolutely wonderful to hear this!! Thanks so much.
cattleman6420012000 4 years ago
I totally agree with you, Cattleman, I share this with you. Love from the Netherlands.
bigfrisian 4 years ago
clear and quite
TAHSEENALANI 4 years ago