Its fine to criticize evolutionary theory but at least show you understand it first. The complexity at the molecular level is not ipso facto evidence of creation, it just shows the intermediate forms (which lead to say, the mouse) bifurcating into the thousands and millions. This complexity means it becomes extremely difficult to tell the full evolutionary tale.
However, thanks to a massive convergence of evidence supporting evolution (though without every step explicitly described right down through the micro-cosmic) it would be absurd to simply throw up our hands and assume evolution has failed us. This guy is the usual soft-headed proponent of intelligent design, mis-representing evolutionary theory in ways that do not give confidence that he understands what he is trying to dismiss.
Hahah, it is both funny and sad that an obviously intelligent man such as this is making arguments which serve only his emotional security...
sedicenobufalo 2 years ago
Its fine to criticize evolutionary theory but at least show you understand it first. The complexity at the molecular level is not ipso facto evidence of creation, it just shows the intermediate forms (which lead to say, the mouse) bifurcating into the thousands and millions. This complexity means it becomes extremely difficult to tell the full evolutionary tale.
TulliusVII 2 years ago
However, thanks to a massive convergence of evidence supporting evolution (though without every step explicitly described right down through the micro-cosmic) it would be absurd to simply throw up our hands and assume evolution has failed us. This guy is the usual soft-headed proponent of intelligent design, mis-representing evolutionary theory in ways that do not give confidence that he understands what he is trying to dismiss.
TulliusVII 2 years ago