BATTLE CRY! ONE GOOD"" GENERAL OFFICER""""Arrest the ""TRAITORS""& WAR CRIMINALS""" BULLDOZE FEDERAL RESERVE"film FIAT EMPIRE""Print TREASURY NOTES"""Throw the UN out of AMERICA, Arrest Companies FDA for Approving (Toxins in our BRAINS) FLUORIDE (Rat Poison) MSG (insect Killer) in our Food Water, Soft Drinks 30 Video FLUORIDEALERTorg, Restore CONSTITUTION, Repeal the patriot Act, Arrest USACOR, Bust up the News Media from 5 to 50 Groups"""RESTORE AMERICA!!
The idea of a scientific investigation is to try and fill in the gaps/the unknowns/the unanswered questions, by reasoned evidence and valid scientific testable research. It is not science to say we don't know what happened therefore we are not going to bother to find out. That alone should set the alarm bells ringing. In addition asking for truth is not a conspiracy.
@24414330 the starting point of science is admitting that we don't know. but the questions raised by the truthers have already been answered or simply trivial. from some reason truthers insist of referring to them as evidence. no scientific paper that was written by truthers was accepted by other experts. the use of pseudo science by ignorant people (and by those who sell 9/11 products) who pretend to be physics experts only makes those people and the entire truth movement look ridiculous.
As recent as 1st March 2012, an independent analysis of Jones/Harret et al. Red/Gray Chips 'thermitic material' has been completed. Results to be printed in a peer viewed journal.
You can follow the discussion here - forums . randi . org/showthread . php?t=231314 (remove the spaces from around the . )
In summery; "there is no evidence of individual elemental aluminum particles of any size in the red/gray chips" and are therefore not thermite or nano-thermite.
You people are missing the entire point of the information.
Not having it means you haven't even researched enough to know if it's even possible.
How long would it take to put X amount of explosives in X spot,and how would you get X explosives to X spot? How much X explosives for beams? How much X explosives for concrete?
So far you theorist make a claim and challenge anyone to prove you wrong.If no one responds,you claim victory and that's your proof.You wait for someone else to research and then all you do is criticize the results and that proves your theory.
For once..Do your own research and prove something you say.
What does it take to blow a building apart?
I want to know.You're the experts making the claim.You should know.
@stayinstock And those without a question in their heart will continue to belittle those with the questions in theirs? A theory is a theory, yet to be proven. Don't stand in the way of answers, that makes you no better than those who actually commit the crime.
@stayinstock Did you even watch the first, oh... 5 minutes of the film? They make it clear that they don't have all the answers because there hasn't yet been an independent investigation. For them to even begin to answer your questions they need to be able to investigate.
@Tzara86 So the gathering of experts is to do what? Make someone else research it?That's what I'm saying..You have all these experts.I'm sure they must be capable of researching their respected fields of expertise.You waiting for me to prove it?
@Tzara86 You look at a video and determine explosives were used. You must have some idea what it takes to produce what you are seeing.You make a statement that it had to be explosives.You have to be able to produce a workable detonation diagram.You been at it for how long?
How can you expect people to believe that statement if all you do is attack anyone that asks a completely relevant question about it?
How about you just work on the answer and leave it at that.
@stayinstock They clearly don't have the evidence to go over and to determine the answers to your questions, or their own! If you've watched the full movie then you should know that these people aren't 'bad guys' who have to prove anything to a skeptic in a youtube comments. By the way, the group in video attacks no one. If you're referencing how you're treated in the comments here, you certainly have high expectations for everyone but yourself.
@stayinstock I've seen photos of the steel columns melted on a completely straight 45 degree angle. It's likely in one of the basement floors where it was rigged. This is my impression though, I'm not an engineer :P
@Tzara86 I've seen beams cut at a 45 by Iron workers with torches during search and rescue and cleanup.To this date,no one who took those pictures have said they even asked the fireman what happened to the beams.It's all been conspiracy biased speculation.
Don't dance around it.Everyone is tired of the thermite cures all.You people carry it around like you just invented penicillin. You didn't.
You invented what you think fits your theories.
You don't even have chain of custody for the dust samples.If you have a this huge resource of experts,coming up with a layout of explosives shouldn't be that hard.You theorize everything else.
@stayinstock Then it shouldn't bother you at all that families of victims would have a solid reassurance from an independent investigation. Your word won't do that for them.
Where were the explosives placed and how much?What research have you done? So far all I see is a backyard thermite experiment and people talking about how things "look".
I can talk about how things look and be just as experienced in it as anyone.
You claim explosives...how are you going to prove it if you can't come up with a plausible sequence diagram for what was seen?
@stayinstock What about the response team??? There is so many holes in this topic. Agents were sent home that day. Airforce bases were within 20 minutes flight time, yet the towers were hit 2 hours apart. Where's the interceptors? Why is this played out just like Pearl Harbor? Why was the primary structural damage to B7 on the South side? Did you see the Pentagon video that was removed from the intertnet?? The one that the FBI confiscated from that light post. You missed it.
@LendMeYourHand You're asking me to speak for the pentagons security measures and priorities. I don't know their plan in something like that.
I do know what the physical evidence says.People saw the planes,people saw the pentagon plane.The wreckage inside the pentagon is more than a missile would leave.
The second hit is more than enough proof of the energy involved in a plane crash.
I think what you mean was the frame rate was too slow to catch the plane.
There is more than enough evidence to prove a plane hit the pentagon.
So either they tied the wreckage to a missile,or, elves ran in and planted it,wrapping it around the columns in the process after the bomb went off,or, a plane hit the pentagon.
The new investigation has already been done by Dr. Judy Wood, former professor of mechanical engineering at Clemson University in her book "WHERE DID THE TOWERS GO?".
In addition to a new investigation, she now calls for accountability in the coverup of 9/11 (drjudywood com).
Her book shows evidence of directed free-energy-technology in the dustification of the towers. No thermite or mini-nuke can do such dissolving of material into fine dust!
The only reason I am liking this video is becasue they just showed how screwed up and corrupt our nation is. The go against laws just to take a building away because they, in some way, had something to do with it.
We may never know the real truth, why, because most Americans don't care. I am not a conspiracy theorist, but I know our government is corrupt, our corporations are corrupt, and our media is corrupt. As a society we have regressed, we have lost all the freedoms and achievements our parents, grandparents and forefathers have fought and worked hard to get. Revolution is our only option...
@TheJohndoemofo Ironically, even if we don't consider ourselves conspiracy theorists, if we support a revolution because we believe the higher powers are corrupt we are automatically labelled this way. Being a conspiracy theorist isn't a bad thing, it's just veiled this way by the media to make people avoid asking questions. They're relying on human nature and our deep need to feel accepted. It's no surprise the conspirators would want to paint their exposers as nut jobs.
Molten steel; buildings turn into dust; thermite confirmed in the dust; bombs in the basement before the first plane hit; NIST admits WTC7 free-fall speed; Cheney stand-down order; 2.1 trillion missing from Pentagon 1 day before plane hits the accounting dept; hijackers alive; 1600+ verified architects and engineers doubt the official story, as well as 6/10 commissioners that devised the "9/11 Commission Report"; FBI admits there's no hard evidence to back it up - inside job, plain and simple.
It was my understanding, from spoken words I heard on videos, officials said "We're going to pull building seven, get everyone clear". I've always said 7 is the smoking gun. How was it prepared for demolition in such short time when they said it would have taken years to prep towers one and two? Why did Rudy INSIST 7 be security headquarters despite objections by others?
@LarryHarveyMusic this is sport. but more people die in traffic accidents each year than all this war, 911, so the people that did this knew a few for huge gain is something we are ok with.
I'm RACIST for criticizing Obama, a TERRORIST because I'm against the Bush wars, ANTISEMITIC for not supporting Israel unconditionally, a TEABAGGER for supporting the Constitution, a TRUTHER for asking unanswered questions, a TRAITOR for whistle-blowing on my corrupt government artocites, a CONSPIRACY THEORIST for presenting documented facts, a TROLL for uploading news, videos, and quotes, and ANTI-AMERICAN for supporting a Constitutionalist like Dr. Ron Paul.
you people! those pockets of air are from the elevator shafts and stairwells going out the point of least resistance and those who helped clean up the site said that there was NO explosive residue and why should we CARE about 7's collapse because all that happened was it came down, it would have been brought down anyway if it hadn't
@kyleG014 Ok mr cognitive dissonance, so how come in fact explosive residue has been found, and how did 7 actually come down then, by magic? It's not important that the government is consistently lying about the fate of (at least one of) the buildings that day? What kind of argument is that, really. You people...
@njuf9 A university dean is an administrator that heads a department, college, or an university. The complete job description of a university dean may vary from school to school, but typically the dean performs administrative tasks, is able to hire or fire professors, interacts with students, and sets goals for the department as well as running of the department, college, or university. A university dean is typically an experienced professor and is often hired from within the existing faculty.
And also, we NEED Ron Paul in 2012. Its the most important presidential election in our history and our future depends on shaking up the establishment government that is running its agenda at will with almost no opposition. Ron Paul is the only candidate that can and will try to change that.
@dustyarosa Ron Paul can't change shit. If he somehow becomes president and then tries to take on the system... well look what happened to Kennedy. The final coup d'etat of the MIC was effected then, and every coup since then has been of the cold/bureaucratic nature, including 9/11 and the recent banking one over here in EU. Sad but true.
I will try to get as many people as humanly possible to watch this video. I think im lucky because I never really went through a denial stage with 9/11. That must mean my world view was already shit before any of this happened. All it took was the smoke to clear and a little time to sort things out. Of course videos and articles like this helped me get there. But I am a major minority among my friend and family circle and whoever I can get to spend the time to see this will hopefully see truth
time for the american people to grow some balls and start bringing these criminals to justice. tampering with evidence and destroying evidence is a good place to start. as thats where the new investigation can start from. bush and blair need sorting out. and the crinimal bankster wanabe gangsters and that fucking sliverstien guy who owns the buildings. ron paul 2012 lets start hunting down the decievers
@crythisbloodforme there is everything you can do about it. the people can make this happen and get the real criminals. the domestic ones in government and the military
It is INDISPUTABLE that many, MANY people heard the explosions before it came down. It is INDISPUTABLE that the steel was removed and melted down illegally and without proper investigation. A building cannot defy the laws of physics and fireman, policeman etc would NOT lie about the explosions before they came down. Anyone who says this isn't a false flag event is a fool or a Government Troll and these comments have plenty of both!
Ron Paul is great but, I don't see why people don't realise he is no different than Obama. When Obama was running his campaign people praised him saying he is the new hope and Bush is finally leaving. Four years later we are saying Ron Paul is the new hope. I wonder how long it will take for people to realise people like Obama have no power and are just set up illusions for the people.
@SelectionNatural You don't seem to be doing your research on the candidates at all. For anyone to simply believe the rhetoric is stupid. Ron Paul is NOT associated to the Bilderberg group, Club of Rome, Skull&Bones, CFR, Trilateral Commission or Bohemian Grove. Obama is associated to these elitist groups and people warned about him before he was elected but as usual sheep don't listen. RON PAUL 2012.
@SelectionNatural The fact that mainstream media has engaged in censorship of Ron Paul is proof enough that he is genuine and not backed by the establishment, where-as Obama, and every other candidate, are backed by the biggest corporations in the Country. That is the evidence, we know Ron Paul is the real deal because big media and corporations don't like him.
having worked in the foundry industry for 20 years gaining ONC technicians grade one i used thermite to keep metal liquid for extended periods after casting to eleviate the problem of directional solidification or liquid shrinkage this material burns at extreme temperatures
@Tommyr Every statement that is not an analytic proposition of pure logic is a synthetic proposition, (a matter of opinion) and can be consistently denied, if you so choose. Even physical theories such as Relativity and Quantum Mechanics that have been laboratory tested to extremely high precision are just opinions. This is about empiricism, plausibility and falsification of hypotheses. Try again.
@Tommyr Paranoia: 1. A mental condition characterized by delusions of persecution, unwarranted jealousy, or exaggerated self-importance. 2. Suspicion and mistrust of people or their actions without evidence or justification.
Even though this film shows that there is plenty of evidence, let's pretend there was absolutely no evidence; 3000 deaths and billions of dollars of damages is justification for an independent investigation.
Only 80,000 views.....shitty music videos or stupid videos about kittens and crap like that have tens of millions of views, and not even 100,00 Americans will take the time to watch this. That's really fucked up...
Directly below me there are several CAREER 911 debunkers. These folks HAVE NO LIVES
They troll YT EVERYDAY for 12hrs...sometimes as much as 24-36hrs at a time. The slander the truth, but NEVER will you see them prove the official 911 theory. IE cavemen evaded NORAD,the CIA,FBI,Military Intel.....
I do not live inside the lie like they do......most notably is one who is a canadian.
(12weasel100)..XD As if this has anything to do with him.Worry about your own fuckin country.
Richard Gage is a fucking idiot. AETruth is a group of fucking idiots. The only people dumber than Gage are the morons that follow and believe his bullshit stories
Truthers are fucking idiots. Retarded monkeys are smarter than Truthers.
Wall Street is Missing TRILLIONS and DOJ and FBI / Secret Service / SEC / Postal / even the Congress the States NOBODY WANTS TO START THE INVESTIGATIONS BECAUSE >>>>---> The Money Just Didn't DISAPPEAR it's been BUYING ELECTIONS and SECRET WAR OPERATIONS for many many years.
Google This Colonias Bank Looting Subslime Land Fraud Wall Street Corruption Witham
We need to deal with the reality of 9/11, but that will never happen as long as the American people continue to buy into the “two party” false paradigm.
The definition of insanity is repeating the same behavior over and over again expecting a different result.
People who vote for establishment candidates fit that definition perfectly.
Ron Paul is the only sane choice in 2012.
A&Efor911Truth will not succeed without a drastic change in Washington.
@KevinMerck to e honest i doubt that will truly change things. in all honesty, as far as i have researched, it concerns the catholic church,islam,america(of course), and the jesuits. basically as far as the countries/parties i mentioned, there are no clean hands.
@LolsOfRoflica He said It could withstand a 707. So any plane smaller than a 707 should have little to no effect on the WTC. And EVEN THOUGH the 767 is a bigger aircraft OVERALL it not that much bigger and like they said the buildings were made to support multiple hits presumably 2-3. :)
Whoever doesn't know that 911 was an inside job has simply not done their homework.The evidence is overwhelming!Knowing this fact is key to understanding what is going on in our world today.This staged event has created an invisible enemy and has given license to fight innumerable wars that can never be won!They are also using this event to take away our liberties.Most of us know this but amazingly enough others don't!Wolf Blitzer & Bill O'Reilly didn't tell them about it so it isn't true! What!
Thank You for that last comment,..Ron Paul is a great man and the only person that should be considered for the presidency,..I would also like to add that "Fast and Furious" Must be exposed and talked about by everyone,...Everywhere,..
Just my observing "OPINION"..Last I checked we as Americans are still entitled to have one..Unless that right has been stripped away and I didn't get the memo :/
The fact that explosives were present and thier was no investigation to even see if explosives were used, proves to me that thier was a cover up from the beginning. Also the fact that they shipped the evidence away to China to be destroyed is pretty overwhelming evidence in itself that"THEY"had something to hide, like the fact that the metal being shipped had incendiary burns present,or the possibility that the explosive residue was present on and infused within the metal in question. :/
Its still there, 1644 as of now. What comments did they censor? Big deal, its friggin youtube comment section, jesus. Disabling comments is fine when you have tons of trolls and punk s that say anything and everything. That's going to shake your support to the uncovering of the truth behind the worst attack on US soil?
These people are some of the most intelligent people who have ever lived,...Many of them are protogy,..You All better listen to them and let's make sure this new independant investigation gets going,..Sooner rather than later,..
What? Right on their website, December 1st, says 1637 Architects and Engineers.
And genethejet is quite ignorant. If anything; bird, plane, superman, WTC7, whatever, has converted all of its potential energy into kinetic energy (i.e. it is falling at gravitational acceleration [9.81m/s^2), there is NO MORE ENERGY available to crush through anything (like thousands of tons of in place steel columns). There MUST BE A LARGE EXTERNAL SOURCE OF ENERGY (like explosives/incendiaries).
@thisguyoverhere1 They used to post it on top of the front page, first thing you saw when you visited the website.
12/17/11 and it’s not there anymore, just says 1500+.
I don’t want them to fail, but they’re on the wrong path. They started censoring comments on some of their videos and that’s a step in the wrong direction. They will start heading downhill quickly if they take that course.
They won’t get any more of my financial support. What I can afford is going to Ron Paul.
It looks like A & E is beginning to fail. They no longer post how many professionals they have signing up. My hunch is that the numbers are beginning to decline for the simple fact that there’s inadequate leadership and poor decision making. Richard Gage is a great guy but I think he’s putting too much trust in the wrong people.
Perhaps the best way to deal with 911 is to get Ron Paul elected in 2012.
If we can restore Constitutional government that may help shed light on the truth of 911.
@KevinMerck you do realize that for the very reason that Ron Paul would restore constitutional gov't is the very reason that he won't get into office. If you know anything about the agenda that brought about 911, the same agenda that puts puppets into office, its plain to see that Ron Paul does not fit into such an agenda. The president has already been chosen and it has nothing to do with what the people want
@DopeSpotJoe You keep thinking that way, I’ll vote for Ron Paul.
I guess you need to go back to your television, no need to bother you with reality.
People like you will be marched into camps to be processed out of existence. Not because of your race, religion or gender; it will be for your ignorance and cowardice.
Maybe that’s poetic justice, maybe it’s not.
It doesn’t really matter, the end result will be the same.
@KevinMerck go back to my television? I support Ron Pauk too. You missed my point though. Ron Paul supports constitutional gov't. The agenda that steals elections in this country does not. therefore, i dont see how Ron Paul will get elected even if the majority does vote for him. Look at the election of Bush jr. it was rigged. The president isnt elected by the people. anyway, no intention to divide, i was just pointing out the truth
@DopeSpotJoe There’s almost a year before elections. A lot can happen in a year. Register as a Rep. and vote for Paul in the primaries. If he doesn’t win, then there’s a good chance he’ll run third party.
Given the economy, there’s a chance that by the time elections roll around he’ll be the overwhelming favorite in the race, more so than Obama was in 08.
Canceling the elections for WWIII may be the only thing that keeps him out of office. There is no other choice for President in 2012.
@KevinMerck Hey don't worry, dissidents like you will be marched into the camps to be processed along with all the sheeple... they might even do you the honour of letting you jump the queue ;)
Always amusing to see people get into a debate when they don't even know the facts..."planes filled to the top with fuel exploding" sorry..but the planes that hit the towers were only about half full of fuel..which exploded yes, but had little to nothing to do with the actual collapse since it was burned up in about 90 seconds according to the official estimates. These planes damages less then 20% of the total columns which could not fatally destroy the entire structure.
technical shmeknikal....any expert can make a case for anything...there are nutsos everywhere....many people are looking for their 15 minutes....just crazies....planes filled to the top with fuel exploding...this is what happened...nothing else....there are crazies out there....simple as that...most of the architechts are looking for jobs
technical shmeknikal....any expert can make a case for anything...there are nutsos everywhere....many people are looking for their 15 minutes....just crazies....planes filled to the top with fuel exploding...this is what happened...nothing else....there are crazies out there....simple as that...most of the architechts are looking for jobs
@ 3.32, Prez, in inaugural address, says 'scientific integrity has been undermined, and scientific research politicized...in and effort to advance PREDETERMINED IDEAL AGENDAS'. This is the key, people. What he's saying is, you scientists are screwing up their perfect plans, & they (who planned the 911 disaster) are upset for you trying to prove the facts, and you'll never get anywhere with it. You can prove with all the facts, but they'll keep putting you off, never be brought to justice.
FUCK!! ANY HARD HITTING TRUTH ABOUT THE SUSPECTS RESPONSIBLE, THE FUCKING GOD DAM COMMENT/STATEMENT GETS CENSORED!?! I WISH I COULD SUE UTURD FOR IT! FUCK IT!
Seriously. If you think I'm here to do anything but exposing to the viewer dropping by how hypocrtic, brainwashed and terrified of the truth about 9/11 these debunkers are and that they - nomatter how hard they try - can't prove the OCT, you're quite paranoid.
I'm a firm 9/11 Truther and member of AE911Truth. Even though I live far away in Denmark, EU, I was there this year to take part in the annual protestings in NY. Where were you?
@Thetan1974 The law requires a legitimate investigation - end of story- end of argument.
I’ve given thousands of hours to raise awareness about 9/11. I’ve donated what I could financially, but didn’t become a sustaining member because I wanted to see where A&E was headed before I made that kind of commitment to the org.
I’m glad I’m not a “sustaining member” because I won’t give money to people who use censorship.
BTW, you’re not helping anyone with your inarticulate ramblings.
And don't anyone to spam me with.. "there is another explanation" and "I've done research". Because I don't have much ignorance for idiots. So I avoid speaking with them :) simple. I just expressed my opinion . Pardon did I say opinion? Wrong.. I told the truth. Why I know it's the truth? Because laws of physics always apply. Even for American buildings.
The one who believes official story is a retard. Period. Anyone with basic math and physics knowledge must come to same conclusion = demolition. Those who after all this evidence still deny the truth should be shoot dead, along with all the bastards responsible for this. You are the real terrorists, modern day nazis! Oh my bad.. nazis were better. They weren't hiding like cowards among innocent people.. nor did they blame others for murders they've done.
@Thetan1974 it seems for you that everything stands or falls with who to blame. All I do is telling you that something like a controlled demolition did not happen. There is no proof for it. If you want to discuss who's behind the attacks, then let's discuss it.
" All I do is telling you that something like a controlled demolition did not happen."
Well, that's sweet - that you don't believe in the "Osama & the 19 Hijackers" fairy tale either. But if you want to convince people that all the unexaplained phenomenons didn't occur from highly sophisticated military controlled demolitions, you need to explain WHAT caused all those phenomenons.
@Thetan1974 There were 19 hijackers, that's for sure. Osama was widely blamed in the media, but there seems no hard evidence linking him to 9/11. It is likely, since he was also behind the bombings of the WTC in 1993. He was also the founder and financial supplier of his terrorist group, which is referred to as Al-Qaida. Al-Qaida seems to operate in various cells. Osama did play a role in 9/11, no matter how you look at it, only thing is that it can't be proven he was directly involved.
There is NO explaination of how 7 came down at free fall and all the unexplained phenomenons. That you GUESS under a YouTube video doesn't do the job. Sorry. Go out and make a scientific and peer reviewable report that explain them (by your name and not "Caellest89") and present them at a AE911Truth hearing. It IS impossible for you to get it, isn't it?
It's not for sure that there were 19 hijackers. Where is your proof they al 19 went on the planes, first of all?
And regardless of all 19 even were aboard, where is the proof that Atta, al-Shehhi and Hanjour piloted Flights 11, 175 and 77 into their targets? There you go: NOWHERE.
Of course bin Laden played a - involuntary - roie in 9/11. So do every CIA/MI6/Mossad patsy at every false flag; There have to be scapegoats.
I knew it: You're highly religious about the official story and that is of course why you can't see the controlled demolition. The Emperor's New Clothes explain it all.
It's a mystery on that account that you're here on YouTube arguing with one single person un stead of adressing the experts interviewed in the presentation above. Very, very wierd if you want to convince the increasing number of arcitects, engineers and scientists coming out and agreeing in the demolition hypothesis. Don't you want the number of experts at AE911Truth. org to become lower? Don't you want those experts t o see YOUR expertese. Well, this tatctic of yours is very wierd.
@Thetan1974 I believe youtube is a place where a lot of people come together. All can read my comments and learn from it. I have approached experts, like Niels Harrit and explained them the same things, I even asked for explanations, but they remain silent or just give answers like 'SEE REPORT'. Not a real discussion there.
@Thetan1974 >> The large Ca and S peaks may be due to contamination with gypsum from the pulverized wall- board material in the buildings.<< Ofcourse it's not natural substances he found, because everything in the building was man-made. Again read his report. He did not found nano-thermite at all, he only pretends like he has found it...read it
"Ofcourse it's not natural substances he found, because everything in the building was man-made..."
Err, you really want to sound like a jerk becoming totally quibbling, don't you: Again. What you nee to do is show where this subatsnce is to be found "NATURALLY" - you know, without being produced from the bottom up nano-style but that you can go out and find it whenever buildings collapse or make it in your kitchen.
And when you have shown that experiment of how you find this substance "everywhere", you adress AE911Truth with the findings. And please don't call yourself "Caellest89," ok?
Come on, now. Your only wasting your time here digging your self deeper and deeper into the mud of denial. But of course - if that's a hobby of yours, be my guest. I certainly don't hope that your anonymous claims is going to make me doubt that 9/11 was an inside job.
@Thetan1974 Read his damn report, it's litterly in his report. >> The resulting spectrum, shown in Fig. (14), produced the expected peaks for Fe, Si, Al, O, and C. Other peaks included calcium, sul-fur, zinc, chromium and potassium. The occurrence of these elements could be attributed to surface contamination due to the fact that the analysis was performed on the as-collected surface of the red layer. <<< next post
Yeah, you like the guessing that keeps you safe, don't you? It "could" also be nano-thermite that helped in causing a great deal of the unexplained phenomenons. And it is - as long as no other scientific explaination has explained those with a better hypothesis.
Harrit/Jones have found something that uniquely resembles nano-thermite. All we need is the US gov to show some for comparison - at least to rule it out, then. Hmm... guess why they won't. LOL.
@Thetan1974 thruth is, he did not found nano-thermite. That's for sure. It remains an hypothesis that even remains unexplained. How did they get all this stuff in the building (Niels Harrit talks up to 100 ton). How come it did not ignite when fire broke loose after the impact from the plane? How did they know where the plane was going to strike to strategically place all this stuff in order to weaken the structure up till total destruction. There is a much easier explanation to red chips..paint
Truth is, that if this is not military thermite, you have to present how this substance is found "everywhere" or in collapsed buldings. Also, explain eutectic and how 7 was weakened so it came down in free fall.
As long as the presentation that Harrit give you here: watch?v=uNPeMvsSbl4 - where he even responds to critical questions - what is found is nano-thermite. Or you have to explain the unexaplained phenomenons, which is by far best explained with - yep - thermite.
"There is a much easier explanation to red chips..paint"
There is ONE thing that is not easy - but so far impossible, and that is:
PRESENT HOW YOU CREATE THAT SUBSTANCE IN YOUR KITCHEN OR HOW OT OCCURS FROM THE INVIRONMENT IN BULDINGS/AS BUILDINGS COLLAPSES "NATURALLY" IN STEAD OF GUESSING AND TALKING BLAH-BLAH. THANK YOU.
But if you actually DON't fear a new investigation and would love to have it - at least to have us 9/11 truthers being ridiculed once and for all - I respect that. But DO you want a real investigation? Otherwise, of course you fear the truth. And not even comprehending why you do is part of your own psychological self protection.
@Thetan1974 why should I not want another investigation? Go ahead, but I am not in charge of saying a new investigation should be done. Questions raise though, who would be qualified as an independent researcher who would really investigate what was going on? Who has to expertise to go through all the different complex subjects? Ask those you think are unbiased to do an investigation. Could be costly though...nonetheless you have my blessings to investigate.
Why you shouldn't want a new investigation? Because you're a debunker denying the signs of controlled demolition and because you only want to stay anonymous and explain away the unexaplained phenomenons on YouTube. regular Debunk behaviour. But I think it's super cool if you truly don't fear a new investigation. Of you even WANT it, that would be honorable. But to be honest: Don't you believe that "Osama & the 19 Hijackers" did it?
@Thetan1974 It doesn't seem to make sense to you. Even when I tell you, you keep insisting that I don't want a new investigation. I am not denying the signs of controlled demolition. I have looked at them thoroughly, analyzed them systematically, interpreted them systematically, but always found that there was no evidence to support it. Anyway let's try a different approach. What evidence still holds which we did not discuss yet?
It doesn't seem to make sense to you that the official story is an unproven, scientifically conflicting fairy tale created to namely make you believe in the Ghost of Osama bin Laden - and if you have the scientific facts that contradicts that fairy tale, you can't handle it and sadly find yourself debating hours on end to not end up at mental care. On YouTube and as the great "Caellest89."
I don't really know why you think that "debating" with ONE single individual, who have told you several times wht you can work on to convince him of your official religion - without doing so - is going to help you. But it must do in some way. It's psychologiically interesting and I hope the audience enjoy the show.
"Anyway let's try a different approach"
My god, your desperate in trying to convince me about the unexaplainable - in the ever religious CLAIM way. It's crazy.
@Thetan1974 funny to see your way of discussing. From presenting 'evidence' you go to saying 'take it up with experts from AE911thruth' and things like 'the great Caellest89'. I do have to thank you if you think I am too great for you to handle. Seems like you have nothing to say against the explanations I have given to you.
Funny to see how you dodge and twist things to stay in your matrix; I say: IF you have any rebuttals and/or explainations - scientifically and peer reviewed - for the faults of the AE 911 Truth scientists and th eunexplained phenomenons, present them to AE911Truth. You still don't get it. I have all the evidence for CD's I need. Your CLAIMS/thoughts/ religious guessings are not scientific facts.
Kids who don't understand can also be "too great to handle."
@Thetan1974 People are already taking up with AE 911 Truth, but doesn't make a difference. Even when presented with facts people like you remain in denial. See my post on your demolition 'evidence'. I'll post it again for your attention
@Thetan1974 I have explained that there were no sound recordings. The best sound recording is the one from the actual INSIDE of the WTC by one of the Naudet brothers. Also I can give you tons of examples of people describing hearing 'explosions' while clearly there were no explosions. What we know also, from psychological tests, is that testimonies like William Rodriquez change over time. What else is left? Where is the hard (!) proof, apart from witnesses only describing hearing explosions?
Even if those tops of the buildings were heavy enough to press their way down through the path of greatest resistance - which they of course weren't, but lets pretend they were - they still wouldn't cause what we witnessed. There's absolutely no explaination for those phenomenons. Only a criminal cover-up and a denial of investigating them and even admitting to some of them.
I explain excactly to the audience why you fear the Truth. I don't expect YOU to grasp it.
@Thetan1974 how would you tell that it could not happen? Name any event in which a plane struck a building at around 800 km/h and the building collapsed which was totally different from what we saw at 9/11? You talk about the top of the building as if it should have gone side-ways. Ofcourse not. The only force acting on it, is gravity. The weakest part of the structure ofcourse fails first, but the chain of events happens in a blink of an eye.
As most people watching the events that day, I couldn't tell "It could not happen." Like everyone else, I was decieved into believeing that it happened from the planes and fires. Who NOW tell you that it could not happen is the experts above - and they tell you EXCACTLY how it could not happen. Hmm... I get the feeling that you didn't watch the docu? Afraid of the facts again...?
"You talk about the top of the building as if it should have gone side-ways"
I talk about them NOT being able to forcer their way down through the path of greatest resistance and at the same time cause the unexplained phenomenons. It's a easy as that. Whether they would just fall down and rest on the lower parts or whether they would go side-ways is for the experiment in which you fly a 767 into a WTC like building WITHOUT any demolition devises in the building. Capice?
@Thetan1974 greatest resistance doesn't mean it is insurmountable. The forces involved in 9/11 are almost incomprehensible. Anyway, repeating the events of 9/11 would never repeat a similar outcome. That is simply impossible. Let Tiger woods hit the same hole in one at the some golf tournament he once did. You'll never ever will be able to duplicate it.
"Greatest resistance" means that counting in the core of the buildings, there's absolutely NO way the tops became heavy enough to both force their way down through the buildings at hear free fall AND cause the unexplaned phenomenons. NIST don't even re-explain their debunked pan cake theory. They're in deep waters.
" Let Tiger woods hit the same hole in one at the some golf tournament he once did"
Jesus - going ooon and on and on with unscientific blah-blah as Caellest98 on YouTube.
@Thetan1974 WTC 1 & 2 did not fall at free fall speed.You also seem to be pretty fed up with 'caellest89'(!) (not 98) on Youtube, while you are Thetan1974 here on youtube taking on with me. Go ahead, walk away if you don't want to discuss it anymore. Go ahead, take it up with all those real experts who investigated 9/11. Those are your own words. Please don't bother me if you can't take it that you have nothing to stand on anymore! Go away if you had enough...goodbye!
I didn't say that 1 and 2 free falled. They were "near." And the speed of ehich they crumbled could not have happened form the tops. Again: the tops simply weren't heavy enough to force their way down through the lower much stromger parts.
Besides that, the experts above tell you EXCACTLY why the NIST reports are unscientific.
And besides THAT, even a child can see that these buildings collapse in an unnatural way with explosive force. The south tower desintegrades in mid air (etc)
Comment removed
MegaYeshua33 3 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
this is not a documentary, this is a product, a fraud. go by his dvd's. he is laughing all the way to the bank over the ordinary people's ignorance.
bellijklh 4 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
PLEASE FORWARD
from DEADADELTA
BATTLE CRY! ONE GOOD"" GENERAL OFFICER""""Arrest the ""TRAITORS""& WAR CRIMINALS""" BULLDOZE FEDERAL RESERVE"film FIAT EMPIRE""Print TREASURY NOTES"""Throw the UN out of AMERICA, Arrest Companies FDA for Approving (Toxins in our BRAINS) FLUORIDE (Rat Poison) MSG (insect Killer) in our Food Water, Soft Drinks 30 Video FLUORIDEALERTorg, Restore CONSTITUTION, Repeal the patriot Act, Arrest USACOR, Bust up the News Media from 5 to 50 Groups"""RESTORE AMERICA!!
deadadelta 4 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Why The Military Knows Israel Did 9/11
/watch?v=kVKGRB3cygg
War By Deception (9/11, Iraq, PNAC , All Roads Lead To Israel) {Full Film}
/watch?v=CP5JfKPoIl4
9/11 - Missing Links ( full movie )
/watch?v=GD_vwzjdTi4
Israel Betrays America into War with Iran
/watch?v=MnT8bTMN4oU
megamogx 6 days ago
The idea of a scientific investigation is to try and fill in the gaps/the unknowns/the unanswered questions, by reasoned evidence and valid scientific testable research. It is not science to say we don't know what happened therefore we are not going to bother to find out. That alone should set the alarm bells ringing. In addition asking for truth is not a conspiracy.
24414330 1 week ago
@24414330 the starting point of science is admitting that we don't know. but the questions raised by the truthers have already been answered or simply trivial. from some reason truthers insist of referring to them as evidence. no scientific paper that was written by truthers was accepted by other experts. the use of pseudo science by ignorant people (and by those who sell 9/11 products) who pretend to be physics experts only makes those people and the entire truth movement look ridiculous.
bellijklh 4 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@24414330 (OP cjnewson88)
As recent as 1st March 2012, an independent analysis of Jones/Harret et al. Red/Gray Chips 'thermitic material' has been completed. Results to be printed in a peer viewed journal.
You can follow the discussion here - forums . randi . org/showthread . php?t=231314 (remove the spaces from around the . )
In summery; "there is no evidence of individual elemental aluminum particles of any size in the red/gray chips" and are therefore not thermite or nano-thermite.
MegaYeshua33 3 days ago
You people are missing the entire point of the information.
Not having it means you haven't even researched enough to know if it's even possible.
How long would it take to put X amount of explosives in X spot,and how would you get X explosives to X spot? How much X explosives for beams? How much X explosives for concrete?
Those are normal research questions.
stayinstock 1 week ago
So far you theorist make a claim and challenge anyone to prove you wrong.If no one responds,you claim victory and that's your proof.You wait for someone else to research and then all you do is criticize the results and that proves your theory.
For once..Do your own research and prove something you say.
What does it take to blow a building apart?
I want to know.You're the experts making the claim.You should know.
stayinstock 1 week ago
@stayinstock And those without a question in their heart will continue to belittle those with the questions in theirs? A theory is a theory, yet to be proven. Don't stand in the way of answers, that makes you no better than those who actually commit the crime.
Tzara86 1 week ago
@Tzara86 How am I standing in the way of anything?
If you don't have the answer,just say so.I want to know.Where the explosives were placed and how much?
I don't understand why it's a problem.
stayinstock 1 week ago
@stayinstock Did you even watch the first, oh... 5 minutes of the film? They make it clear that they don't have all the answers because there hasn't yet been an independent investigation. For them to even begin to answer your questions they need to be able to investigate.
Tzara86 1 week ago
@Tzara86 So the gathering of experts is to do what? Make someone else research it?That's what I'm saying..You have all these experts.I'm sure they must be capable of researching their respected fields of expertise.You waiting for me to prove it?
stayinstock 1 week ago
@Tzara86 You look at a video and determine explosives were used. You must have some idea what it takes to produce what you are seeing.You make a statement that it had to be explosives.You have to be able to produce a workable detonation diagram.You been at it for how long?
How can you expect people to believe that statement if all you do is attack anyone that asks a completely relevant question about it?
How about you just work on the answer and leave it at that.
stayinstock 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@stayinstock They clearly don't have the evidence to go over and to determine the answers to your questions, or their own! If you've watched the full movie then you should know that these people aren't 'bad guys' who have to prove anything to a skeptic in a youtube comments. By the way, the group in video attacks no one. If you're referencing how you're treated in the comments here, you certainly have high expectations for everyone but yourself.
Tzara86 4 days ago
Where were the explosives placed and how much was used?
BallPark it!
Any clues?
stayinstock 1 week ago
@stayinstock I've seen photos of the steel columns melted on a completely straight 45 degree angle. It's likely in one of the basement floors where it was rigged. This is my impression though, I'm not an engineer :P
Tzara86 1 week ago
@Tzara86 I've seen beams cut at a 45 by Iron workers with torches during search and rescue and cleanup.To this date,no one who took those pictures have said they even asked the fireman what happened to the beams.It's all been conspiracy biased speculation.
At any rate,that hardly answers the question.
stayinstock 1 week ago
@Tzara86 Also.
If they rigged it at the bottom.
What was going on at the top?
Don't dance around it.Everyone is tired of the thermite cures all.You people carry it around like you just invented penicillin. You didn't.
You invented what you think fits your theories.
You don't even have chain of custody for the dust samples.If you have a this huge resource of experts,coming up with a layout of explosives shouldn't be that hard.You theorize everything else.
stayinstock 1 week ago
@stayinstock Then it shouldn't bother you at all that families of victims would have a solid reassurance from an independent investigation. Your word won't do that for them.
Tzara86 1 week ago
@Tzara86 Exactly the reason I asked the question.
Where were the explosives placed and how much?What research have you done? So far all I see is a backyard thermite experiment and people talking about how things "look".
I can talk about how things look and be just as experienced in it as anyone.
You claim explosives...how are you going to prove it if you can't come up with a plausible sequence diagram for what was seen?
You have to prove it.It's your claim.
stayinstock 1 week ago
@stayinstock What about the response team??? There is so many holes in this topic. Agents were sent home that day. Airforce bases were within 20 minutes flight time, yet the towers were hit 2 hours apart. Where's the interceptors? Why is this played out just like Pearl Harbor? Why was the primary structural damage to B7 on the South side? Did you see the Pentagon video that was removed from the intertnet?? The one that the FBI confiscated from that light post. You missed it.
LendMeYourHand 1 week ago
@LendMeYourHand You're asking me to speak for the pentagons security measures and priorities. I don't know their plan in something like that.
I do know what the physical evidence says.People saw the planes,people saw the pentagon plane.The wreckage inside the pentagon is more than a missile would leave.
The second hit is more than enough proof of the energy involved in a plane crash.
Make it all fit.
stayinstock 1 week ago
@stayinstock Not a missle. What you missed by not seeing the Pentagon video, is the explosion going off from inside the Pentagon.
LendMeYourHand 1 week ago
@LendMeYourHand And the wreckage came from where?
I think what you mean was the frame rate was too slow to catch the plane.
There is more than enough evidence to prove a plane hit the pentagon.
So either they tied the wreckage to a missile,or, elves ran in and planted it,wrapping it around the columns in the process after the bomb went off,or, a plane hit the pentagon.
It really is that simple.
stayinstock 1 week ago
The new investigation has already been done by Dr. Judy Wood, former professor of mechanical engineering at Clemson University in her book "WHERE DID THE TOWERS GO?".
In addition to a new investigation, she now calls for accountability in the coverup of 9/11 (drjudywood com).
Her book shows evidence of directed free-energy-technology in the dustification of the towers. No thermite or mini-nuke can do such dissolving of material into fine dust!
1x2be 1 week ago
The only reason I am liking this video is becasue they just showed how screwed up and corrupt our nation is. The go against laws just to take a building away because they, in some way, had something to do with it.
BoxxieTROLLS 1 week ago
We may never know the real truth, why, because most Americans don't care. I am not a conspiracy theorist, but I know our government is corrupt, our corporations are corrupt, and our media is corrupt. As a society we have regressed, we have lost all the freedoms and achievements our parents, grandparents and forefathers have fought and worked hard to get. Revolution is our only option...
TheJohndoemofo 2 weeks ago
@TheJohndoemofo Ironically, even if we don't consider ourselves conspiracy theorists, if we support a revolution because we believe the higher powers are corrupt we are automatically labelled this way. Being a conspiracy theorist isn't a bad thing, it's just veiled this way by the media to make people avoid asking questions. They're relying on human nature and our deep need to feel accepted. It's no surprise the conspirators would want to paint their exposers as nut jobs.
Tzara86 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Molten steel; buildings turn into dust; thermite confirmed in the dust; bombs in the basement before the first plane hit; NIST admits WTC7 free-fall speed; Cheney stand-down order; 2.1 trillion missing from Pentagon 1 day before plane hits the accounting dept; hijackers alive; 1600+ verified architects and engineers doubt the official story, as well as 6/10 commissioners that devised the "9/11 Commission Report"; FBI admits there's no hard evidence to back it up - inside job, plain and simple.
DocumentaryArchive 2 weeks ago
you talk too much ppl, Relax !
psycosid66 3 weeks ago
watch?v=ghpL501BXXI explains about the people that "died"
Budsmokerhaha 1 month ago
Respect to ae 9/11 and there hardwork fuck main stream media who ignore the facts
maxelldunes 1 month ago 5
Best 9/11 documentary yet
thefiltered1 1 month ago
I hope more people veiw this
frankypower007 1 month ago
Great video
TheCorruptA 1 month ago
It was my understanding, from spoken words I heard on videos, officials said "We're going to pull building seven, get everyone clear". I've always said 7 is the smoking gun. How was it prepared for demolition in such short time when they said it would have taken years to prep towers one and two? Why did Rudy INSIST 7 be security headquarters despite objections by others?
LarryHarveyMusic 1 month ago
@LarryHarveyMusic this is sport. but more people die in traffic accidents each year than all this war, 911, so the people that did this knew a few for huge gain is something we are ok with.
Javeriffic 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I'm RACIST for criticizing Obama, a TERRORIST because I'm against the Bush wars, ANTISEMITIC for not supporting Israel unconditionally, a TEABAGGER for supporting the Constitution, a TRUTHER for asking unanswered questions, a TRAITOR for whistle-blowing on my corrupt government artocites, a CONSPIRACY THEORIST for presenting documented facts, a TROLL for uploading news, videos, and quotes, and ANTI-AMERICAN for supporting a Constitutionalist like Dr. Ron Paul.
badatthis 1 month ago
you people! those pockets of air are from the elevator shafts and stairwells going out the point of least resistance and those who helped clean up the site said that there was NO explosive residue and why should we CARE about 7's collapse because all that happened was it came down, it would have been brought down anyway if it hadn't
kyleG014 1 month ago
@kyleG014 Ok mr cognitive dissonance, so how come in fact explosive residue has been found, and how did 7 actually come down then, by magic? It's not important that the government is consistently lying about the fate of (at least one of) the buildings that day? What kind of argument is that, really. You people...
BagarozziBoi 1 month ago
Research Dr Judy Wood's evidence. This message will be deleted by ae911truth because they don't want you to look for the truth.
br0wnb3rry 1 month ago
My physics professor said the exact same thing about WTC7.... the very next day he was shut up by the Dean. Go figure
Caziegirl 1 month ago
@Caziegirl Who is Dean?
njuf9 1 month ago
@njuf9 A university dean is an administrator that heads a department, college, or an university. The complete job description of a university dean may vary from school to school, but typically the dean performs administrative tasks, is able to hire or fire professors, interacts with students, and sets goals for the department as well as running of the department, college, or university. A university dean is typically an experienced professor and is often hired from within the existing faculty.
Caziegirl 1 month ago
And also, we NEED Ron Paul in 2012. Its the most important presidential election in our history and our future depends on shaking up the establishment government that is running its agenda at will with almost no opposition. Ron Paul is the only candidate that can and will try to change that.
dustyarosa 1 month ago
@dustyarosa Ron Paul can't change shit. If he somehow becomes president and then tries to take on the system... well look what happened to Kennedy. The final coup d'etat of the MIC was effected then, and every coup since then has been of the cold/bureaucratic nature, including 9/11 and the recent banking one over here in EU. Sad but true.
BagarozziBoi 1 month ago
I will try to get as many people as humanly possible to watch this video. I think im lucky because I never really went through a denial stage with 9/11. That must mean my world view was already shit before any of this happened. All it took was the smoke to clear and a little time to sort things out. Of course videos and articles like this helped me get there. But I am a major minority among my friend and family circle and whoever I can get to spend the time to see this will hopefully see truth
dustyarosa 1 month ago
time for the american people to grow some balls and start bringing these criminals to justice. tampering with evidence and destroying evidence is a good place to start. as thats where the new investigation can start from. bush and blair need sorting out. and the crinimal bankster wanabe gangsters and that fucking sliverstien guy who owns the buildings. ron paul 2012 lets start hunting down the decievers
azeivio 1 month ago
i stopped caring about 9/11 a while ago, we all know it wasnt terrorism , nothing we can do now its in the past
crythisbloodforme 1 month ago
@crythisbloodforme there is everything you can do about it. the people can make this happen and get the real criminals. the domestic ones in government and the military
azeivio 1 month ago
It is INDISPUTABLE that many, MANY people heard the explosions before it came down. It is INDISPUTABLE that the steel was removed and melted down illegally and without proper investigation. A building cannot defy the laws of physics and fireman, policeman etc would NOT lie about the explosions before they came down. Anyone who says this isn't a false flag event is a fool or a Government Troll and these comments have plenty of both!
shtfbugoutman 1 month ago
Ron Paul is great but, I don't see why people don't realise he is no different than Obama. When Obama was running his campaign people praised him saying he is the new hope and Bush is finally leaving. Four years later we are saying Ron Paul is the new hope. I wonder how long it will take for people to realise people like Obama have no power and are just set up illusions for the people.
SelectionNatural 1 month ago
@SelectionNatural You don't seem to be doing your research on the candidates at all. For anyone to simply believe the rhetoric is stupid. Ron Paul is NOT associated to the Bilderberg group, Club of Rome, Skull&Bones, CFR, Trilateral Commission or Bohemian Grove. Obama is associated to these elitist groups and people warned about him before he was elected but as usual sheep don't listen. RON PAUL 2012.
pigeonpsycho 1 month ago
@SelectionNatural The fact that mainstream media has engaged in censorship of Ron Paul is proof enough that he is genuine and not backed by the establishment, where-as Obama, and every other candidate, are backed by the biggest corporations in the Country. That is the evidence, we know Ron Paul is the real deal because big media and corporations don't like him.
YVFH45SE 1 month ago
having worked in the foundry industry for 20 years gaining ONC technicians grade one i used thermite to keep metal liquid for extended periods after casting to eleviate the problem of directional solidification or liquid shrinkage this material burns at extreme temperatures
muirste 1 month ago
This video is for the retarded obviously. It's total nonsense Made for the stupid by assclowns.
Tommyr 1 month ago
@Tommyr a film full of facts is retarded? do you watch fox news by any chance?
jackvincent90 1 month ago
@jackvincent90 It's a film full of OPINONS and shit.
Tommyr 1 month ago
@Tommyr vs the official opinion lol
jackvincent90 1 month ago
@Tommyr
I guess you didn't watch all of the movie. They mentioned people like you in the end. Those who see the truth, and yet continue to deny it.
SpatialVortex 1 month ago
@Tommyr Every statement that is not an analytic proposition of pure logic is a synthetic proposition, (a matter of opinion) and can be consistently denied, if you so choose. Even physical theories such as Relativity and Quantum Mechanics that have been laboratory tested to extremely high precision are just opinions. This is about empiricism, plausibility and falsification of hypotheses. Try again.
BagarozziBoi 1 month ago
@Tommyr But it isn't 'made up' though is it. Learn to pay attention and stop being so scared.
MrDarkTides 1 month ago
@MrDarkTides Paranoia is a terrible thing folks.....
Tommyr 1 month ago
@Tommyr So is ignorance X
MrDarkTides 1 month ago
@Tommyr Ad hominem. Try again.
BagarozziBoi 1 month ago
@Tommyr Paranoia: 1. A mental condition characterized by delusions of persecution, unwarranted jealousy, or exaggerated self-importance. 2. Suspicion and mistrust of people or their actions without evidence or justification.
Even though this film shows that there is plenty of evidence, let's pretend there was absolutely no evidence; 3000 deaths and billions of dollars of damages is justification for an independent investigation.
Tzara86 1 week ago
@Tommyr Care to back that assertion with a reasoned argument instead of, say, insults?
Thought not.
BagarozziBoi 1 month ago
Only 80,000 views.....shitty music videos or stupid videos about kittens and crap like that have tens of millions of views, and not even 100,00 Americans will take the time to watch this. That's really fucked up...
getcruunkk 1 month ago
Directly below me there are several CAREER 911 debunkers. These folks HAVE NO LIVES
They troll YT EVERYDAY for 12hrs...sometimes as much as 24-36hrs at a time. The slander the truth, but NEVER will you see them prove the official 911 theory. IE cavemen evaded NORAD,the CIA,FBI,Military Intel.....
I do not live inside the lie like they do......most notably is one who is a canadian.
(12weasel100)..XD As if this has anything to do with him.Worry about your own fuckin country.
FreedumbFighter28 2 months ago
Richard Gage is a fucking idiot. AETruth is a group of fucking idiots. The only people dumber than Gage are the morons that follow and believe his bullshit stories
Truthers are fucking idiots. Retarded monkeys are smarter than Truthers.
12weasel100 2 months ago
@12weasel100
A weasel, true their name.
deadflagbluesxxx 1 month ago
@deadflagbluesxxx yeah OK you fucking retard
12weasel100 1 month ago
Wall Street is Missing TRILLIONS and DOJ and FBI / Secret Service / SEC / Postal / even the Congress the States NOBODY WANTS TO START THE INVESTIGATIONS BECAUSE >>>>---> The Money Just Didn't DISAPPEAR it's been BUYING ELECTIONS and SECRET WAR OPERATIONS for many many years.
Google This Colonias Bank Looting Subslime Land Fraud Wall Street Corruption Witham
jurisnot 2 months ago
We need to deal with the reality of 9/11, but that will never happen as long as the American people continue to buy into the “two party” false paradigm.
The definition of insanity is repeating the same behavior over and over again expecting a different result.
People who vote for establishment candidates fit that definition perfectly.
Ron Paul is the only sane choice in 2012.
A&Efor911Truth will not succeed without a drastic change in Washington.
KevinMerck 2 months ago 15
@KevinMerck to e honest i doubt that will truly change things. in all honesty, as far as i have researched, it concerns the catholic church,islam,america(of course), and the jesuits. basically as far as the countries/parties i mentioned, there are no clean hands.
0893deuce 2 months ago
@LolsOfRoflica He said It could withstand a 707. So any plane smaller than a 707 should have little to no effect on the WTC. And EVEN THOUGH the 767 is a bigger aircraft OVERALL it not that much bigger and like they said the buildings were made to support multiple hits presumably 2-3. :)
StudiosXPS 2 months ago
Note: there is a piece of video that repeats the foregoing minute: from around 5. 20 min on starts the repetition.
MrHansJanmaat 2 months ago
Whoever doesn't know that 911 was an inside job has simply not done their homework.The evidence is overwhelming!Knowing this fact is key to understanding what is going on in our world today.This staged event has created an invisible enemy and has given license to fight innumerable wars that can never be won!They are also using this event to take away our liberties.Most of us know this but amazingly enough others don't!Wolf Blitzer & Bill O'Reilly didn't tell them about it so it isn't true! What!
seektruthandwisdom 2 months ago in playlist Favorite videos
Thank You for that last comment,..Ron Paul is a great man and the only person that should be considered for the presidency,..I would also like to add that "Fast and Furious" Must be exposed and talked about by everyone,...Everywhere,..
Eagleeyeondc 2 months ago
@LolsOfRoflica Ron Paul is about to win Iowa. We all need to get out there and register to vote for him in the primaries.
The truth about 9/11 will not make any difference when we’re living in the worst police state the world has ever known.
We all need to focus on making sure Ron Paul wins the Presidency and that includes everyone at A&E911Truth.
KevinMerck 2 months ago 17
@KevinMerck the next president is irrelevant.to be honest.
0893deuce 2 months ago
@0893deuce Yup just a figurehead. Try to change anything, and go the same way Kennedy went.
BagarozziBoi 1 month ago
@KevinMerck Why vote for a fake/coward?
UNTC321 1 month ago
Just my observing "OPINION"..Last I checked we as Americans are still entitled to have one..Unless that right has been stripped away and I didn't get the memo :/
disposablefreedom 2 months ago
The fact that explosives were present and thier was no investigation to even see if explosives were used, proves to me that thier was a cover up from the beginning. Also the fact that they shipped the evidence away to China to be destroyed is pretty overwhelming evidence in itself that"THEY"had something to hide, like the fact that the metal being shipped had incendiary burns present,or the possibility that the explosive residue was present on and infused within the metal in question. :/
disposablefreedom 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@KevinMerck
Its still there, 1644 as of now. What comments did they censor? Big deal, its friggin youtube comment section, jesus. Disabling comments is fine when you have tons of trolls and punk s that say anything and everything. That's going to shake your support to the uncovering of the truth behind the worst attack on US soil?
thisguyoverhere1 2 months ago
Comment removed
thisguyoverhere1 2 months ago
These people are some of the most intelligent people who have ever lived,...Many of them are protogy,..You All better listen to them and let's make sure this new independant investigation gets going,..Sooner rather than later,..
Eagleeyeondc 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Please have a look at my channel.It's got several videos like this
microcephalec 2 months ago
@KevinMerck
What? Right on their website, December 1st, says 1637 Architects and Engineers.
And genethejet is quite ignorant. If anything; bird, plane, superman, WTC7, whatever, has converted all of its potential energy into kinetic energy (i.e. it is falling at gravitational acceleration [9.81m/s^2), there is NO MORE ENERGY available to crush through anything (like thousands of tons of in place steel columns). There MUST BE A LARGE EXTERNAL SOURCE OF ENERGY (like explosives/incendiaries).
thisguyoverhere1 3 months ago
@thisguyoverhere1 They used to post it on top of the front page, first thing you saw when you visited the website.
12/17/11 and it’s not there anymore, just says 1500+.
I don’t want them to fail, but they’re on the wrong path. They started censoring comments on some of their videos and that’s a step in the wrong direction. They will start heading downhill quickly if they take that course.
They won’t get any more of my financial support. What I can afford is going to Ron Paul.
KevinMerck 2 months ago
what happens when engineers make a video? 50% is experts stating their credentials
TKBarks 3 months ago 2
@TKBarks So right you are. Annoying, to say the least.
A video showing off CV's.
HMClagi 1 month ago
It looks like A & E is beginning to fail. They no longer post how many professionals they have signing up. My hunch is that the numbers are beginning to decline for the simple fact that there’s inadequate leadership and poor decision making. Richard Gage is a great guy but I think he’s putting too much trust in the wrong people.
Perhaps the best way to deal with 911 is to get Ron Paul elected in 2012.
If we can restore Constitutional government that may help shed light on the truth of 911.
KevinMerck 3 months ago
@KevinMerck you do realize that for the very reason that Ron Paul would restore constitutional gov't is the very reason that he won't get into office. If you know anything about the agenda that brought about 911, the same agenda that puts puppets into office, its plain to see that Ron Paul does not fit into such an agenda. The president has already been chosen and it has nothing to do with what the people want
DopeSpotJoe 2 months ago
@DopeSpotJoe You keep thinking that way, I’ll vote for Ron Paul.
I guess you need to go back to your television, no need to bother you with reality.
People like you will be marched into camps to be processed out of existence. Not because of your race, religion or gender; it will be for your ignorance and cowardice.
Maybe that’s poetic justice, maybe it’s not.
It doesn’t really matter, the end result will be the same.
KevinMerck 2 months ago
@KevinMerck go back to my television? I support Ron Pauk too. You missed my point though. Ron Paul supports constitutional gov't. The agenda that steals elections in this country does not. therefore, i dont see how Ron Paul will get elected even if the majority does vote for him. Look at the election of Bush jr. it was rigged. The president isnt elected by the people. anyway, no intention to divide, i was just pointing out the truth
DopeSpotJoe 2 months ago
@DopeSpotJoe There’s almost a year before elections. A lot can happen in a year. Register as a Rep. and vote for Paul in the primaries. If he doesn’t win, then there’s a good chance he’ll run third party.
Given the economy, there’s a chance that by the time elections roll around he’ll be the overwhelming favorite in the race, more so than Obama was in 08.
Canceling the elections for WWIII may be the only thing that keeps him out of office. There is no other choice for President in 2012.
KevinMerck 2 months ago
@KevinMerck Hey don't worry, dissidents like you will be marched into the camps to be processed along with all the sheeple... they might even do you the honour of letting you jump the queue ;)
BagarozziBoi 1 month ago
Always amusing to see people get into a debate when they don't even know the facts..."planes filled to the top with fuel exploding" sorry..but the planes that hit the towers were only about half full of fuel..which exploded yes, but had little to nothing to do with the actual collapse since it was burned up in about 90 seconds according to the official estimates. These planes damages less then 20% of the total columns which could not fatally destroy the entire structure.
lexicon008 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
technical shmeknikal....any expert can make a case for anything...there are nutsos everywhere....many people are looking for their 15 minutes....just crazies....planes filled to the top with fuel exploding...this is what happened...nothing else....there are crazies out there....simple as that...most of the architechts are looking for jobs
genethejet 3 months ago
technical shmeknikal....any expert can make a case for anything...there are nutsos everywhere....many people are looking for their 15 minutes....just crazies....planes filled to the top with fuel exploding...this is what happened...nothing else....there are crazies out there....simple as that...most of the architechts are looking for jobs
genethejet 3 months ago
@genethejet are you on glue look at the science go do your own research you fucking troll
awokenminded 2 months ago
@genethejet They used to make a case for the earth being the center of the universe. Argument by authority!
joshweiss01 2 months ago in playlist Liked videos
@ 3.32, Prez, in inaugural address, says 'scientific integrity has been undermined, and scientific research politicized...in and effort to advance PREDETERMINED IDEAL AGENDAS'. This is the key, people. What he's saying is, you scientists are screwing up their perfect plans, & they (who planned the 911 disaster) are upset for you trying to prove the facts, and you'll never get anywhere with it. You can prove with all the facts, but they'll keep putting you off, never be brought to justice.
jkittyc 3 months ago
0:38:32 Epic sentence.
KurtG85 3 months ago
FUCK!! ANY HARD HITTING TRUTH ABOUT THE SUSPECTS RESPONSIBLE, THE FUCKING GOD DAM COMMENT/STATEMENT GETS CENSORED!?! I WISH I COULD SUE UTURD FOR IT! FUCK IT!
freshkryp69 3 months ago
why is it so hard 2 believe..
that maybe, terrorist planted bombs.
in ground level,for 3 building 'high rise'
to collapse same day,when jet fuel does not
melt metal,i just dont believe the 9/11 commision final report.
i believe the experts..
slyonme 3 months ago
@slyonme lol no. cus that is hard to believe. your government did.
SOSTacoJohnson 3 months ago
@SOSTacoJohnson ..prove it..
slyonme 3 months ago
@slyonme watch the video you stupid dumbshit... jesus christ ur dumb...
SOSTacoJohnson 3 months ago 2
@SOSTacoJohnson ..albert einstein..relax punk bitch
slyonme 3 months ago
@slyonme retard.. that is all
SOSTacoJohnson 3 months ago
@slyonme Yes the "governent" terrorists! and these are experts!
mybeautifulearth 3 months ago
Responsible people around the globe are waking up to the fact that the WTC complex was destroyed by controlled demolition.
Once people have access to the facts, it’s pretty hard for them to keep tolerating the BS.
Welcome, Kevin Bracken, Australian Trades Union President.
watch?v=tE3pMPObcGU
It’s a fact that 75% of our friends down under agree with Kevin on this issue. It’s time for a no-holds-barred investigation of 9/11.
KevinMerck 4 months ago
Two stooges dominating the comment board in an effort to drive people away.
Where have we seen this before?
The law requires a legitimate investigation - end of argument.
I wouldn’t be surprised if Chris Sarns of A&E911Truth is one of these stooges.
Withdraw your financial support from anyone who wants to censor you and that includes A&E911Truth, Alex Jones and *everyone else* who censors people.
KevinMerck 4 months ago
@KevinMerck
Seriously. If you think I'm here to do anything but exposing to the viewer dropping by how hypocrtic, brainwashed and terrified of the truth about 9/11 these debunkers are and that they - nomatter how hard they try - can't prove the OCT, you're quite paranoid.
I'm a firm 9/11 Truther and member of AE911Truth. Even though I live far away in Denmark, EU, I was there this year to take part in the annual protestings in NY. Where were you?
Thetan1974 4 months ago
@Thetan1974 The law requires a legitimate investigation - end of story- end of argument.
I’ve given thousands of hours to raise awareness about 9/11. I’ve donated what I could financially, but didn’t become a sustaining member because I wanted to see where A&E was headed before I made that kind of commitment to the org.
I’m glad I’m not a “sustaining member” because I won’t give money to people who use censorship.
BTW, you’re not helping anyone with your inarticulate ramblings.
KevinMerck 4 months ago
@KevinMerck
Again, where were you on 9/11?
Thetan1974 2 months ago
@Thetan1974 Right on Brother! That's really motivating to hear that.
motonegros 2 months ago
Comment removed
Thetan1974 4 months ago
And don't anyone to spam me with.. "there is another explanation" and "I've done research". Because I don't have much ignorance for idiots. So I avoid speaking with them :) simple. I just expressed my opinion . Pardon did I say opinion? Wrong.. I told the truth. Why I know it's the truth? Because laws of physics always apply. Even for American buildings.
Grcar57 4 months ago
The one who believes official story is a retard. Period. Anyone with basic math and physics knowledge must come to same conclusion = demolition. Those who after all this evidence still deny the truth should be shoot dead, along with all the bastards responsible for this. You are the real terrorists, modern day nazis! Oh my bad.. nazis were better. They weren't hiding like cowards among innocent people.. nor did they blame others for murders they've done.
Grcar57 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Truthers are fucking idiots. Retarded monkeys are smarter than Truthers.
12weasel100 4 months ago
@Thetan1974 it seems for you that everything stands or falls with who to blame. All I do is telling you that something like a controlled demolition did not happen. There is no proof for it. If you want to discuss who's behind the attacks, then let's discuss it.
Caellest89 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Caellest89
" All I do is telling you that something like a controlled demolition did not happen."
Well, that's sweet - that you don't believe in the "Osama & the 19 Hijackers" fairy tale either. But if you want to convince people that all the unexaplained phenomenons didn't occur from highly sophisticated military controlled demolitions, you need to explain WHAT caused all those phenomenons.
Thetan1974 4 months ago
@Thetan1974 There were 19 hijackers, that's for sure. Osama was widely blamed in the media, but there seems no hard evidence linking him to 9/11. It is likely, since he was also behind the bombings of the WTC in 1993. He was also the founder and financial supplier of his terrorist group, which is referred to as Al-Qaida. Al-Qaida seems to operate in various cells. Osama did play a role in 9/11, no matter how you look at it, only thing is that it can't be proven he was directly involved.
Caellest89 4 months ago
@Caellest89
There is NO explaination of how 7 came down at free fall and all the unexplained phenomenons. That you GUESS under a YouTube video doesn't do the job. Sorry. Go out and make a scientific and peer reviewable report that explain them (by your name and not "Caellest89") and present them at a AE911Truth hearing. It IS impossible for you to get it, isn't it?
It's not for sure that there were 19 hijackers. Where is your proof they al 19 went on the planes, first of all?
Thetan1974 4 months ago
@Caellest89
And regardless of all 19 even were aboard, where is the proof that Atta, al-Shehhi and Hanjour piloted Flights 11, 175 and 77 into their targets? There you go: NOWHERE.
Of course bin Laden played a - involuntary - roie in 9/11. So do every CIA/MI6/Mossad patsy at every false flag; There have to be scapegoats.
I knew it: You're highly religious about the official story and that is of course why you can't see the controlled demolition. The Emperor's New Clothes explain it all.
Thetan1974 4 months ago
@Caellest89
It's a mystery on that account that you're here on YouTube arguing with one single person un stead of adressing the experts interviewed in the presentation above. Very, very wierd if you want to convince the increasing number of arcitects, engineers and scientists coming out and agreeing in the demolition hypothesis. Don't you want the number of experts at AE911Truth. org to become lower? Don't you want those experts t o see YOUR expertese. Well, this tatctic of yours is very wierd.
Thetan1974 4 months ago
@Thetan1974 I believe youtube is a place where a lot of people come together. All can read my comments and learn from it. I have approached experts, like Niels Harrit and explained them the same things, I even asked for explanations, but they remain silent or just give answers like 'SEE REPORT'. Not a real discussion there.
Caellest89 4 months ago
@Caellest89
"A different approach" would be you - by YOUR NAME - scientifically explaining [list of unexplained phenomenons.]
Here's a guy who, in the open and with his name, actuallty explains scientifically what caused the eutectic steel:
watch?v=5d5iIoCiI8g
watch?v=VvQDFV1HINw
Now, you don't get it, that what you want to do is showing a rebuttal and another explaination, do you? Nah, you don't.
Thetan1974 4 months ago
@Thetan1974 >> The large Ca and S peaks may be due to contamination with gypsum from the pulverized wall- board material in the buildings.<< Ofcourse it's not natural substances he found, because everything in the building was man-made. Again read his report. He did not found nano-thermite at all, he only pretends like he has found it...read it
Caellest89 4 months ago
@Caellest89
"Ofcourse it's not natural substances he found, because everything in the building was man-made..."
Err, you really want to sound like a jerk becoming totally quibbling, don't you: Again. What you nee to do is show where this subatsnce is to be found "NATURALLY" - you know, without being produced from the bottom up nano-style but that you can go out and find it whenever buildings collapse or make it in your kitchen.
Thetan1974 4 months ago
@Caellest89
And when you have shown that experiment of how you find this substance "everywhere", you adress AE911Truth with the findings. And please don't call yourself "Caellest89," ok?
Come on, now. Your only wasting your time here digging your self deeper and deeper into the mud of denial. But of course - if that's a hobby of yours, be my guest. I certainly don't hope that your anonymous claims is going to make me doubt that 9/11 was an inside job.
Thetan1974 4 months ago
@Thetan1974 Read his damn report, it's litterly in his report. >> The resulting spectrum, shown in Fig. (14), produced the expected peaks for Fe, Si, Al, O, and C. Other peaks included calcium, sul-fur, zinc, chromium and potassium. The occurrence of these elements could be attributed to surface contamination due to the fact that the analysis was performed on the as-collected surface of the red layer. <<< next post
Caellest89 4 months ago
@Caellest89
"these elements COULD be..."
Yeah, you like the guessing that keeps you safe, don't you? It "could" also be nano-thermite that helped in causing a great deal of the unexplained phenomenons. And it is - as long as no other scientific explaination has explained those with a better hypothesis.
Harrit/Jones have found something that uniquely resembles nano-thermite. All we need is the US gov to show some for comparison - at least to rule it out, then. Hmm... guess why they won't. LOL.
Thetan1974 4 months ago
@Thetan1974 thruth is, he did not found nano-thermite. That's for sure. It remains an hypothesis that even remains unexplained. How did they get all this stuff in the building (Niels Harrit talks up to 100 ton). How come it did not ignite when fire broke loose after the impact from the plane? How did they know where the plane was going to strike to strategically place all this stuff in order to weaken the structure up till total destruction. There is a much easier explanation to red chips..paint
Caellest89 4 months ago
@Caellest89
Truth is, that if this is not military thermite, you have to present how this substance is found "everywhere" or in collapsed buldings. Also, explain eutectic and how 7 was weakened so it came down in free fall.
As long as the presentation that Harrit give you here: watch?v=uNPeMvsSbl4 - where he even responds to critical questions - what is found is nano-thermite. Or you have to explain the unexaplained phenomenons, which is by far best explained with - yep - thermite.
Thetan1974 4 months ago
@Caellest89
"There is a much easier explanation to red chips..paint"
There is ONE thing that is not easy - but so far impossible, and that is:
PRESENT HOW YOU CREATE THAT SUBSTANCE IN YOUR KITCHEN OR HOW OT OCCURS FROM THE INVIRONMENT IN BULDINGS/AS BUILDINGS COLLAPSES "NATURALLY" IN STEAD OF GUESSING AND TALKING BLAH-BLAH. THANK YOU.
Thetan1974 4 months ago
@Caellest89
But if you actually DON't fear a new investigation and would love to have it - at least to have us 9/11 truthers being ridiculed once and for all - I respect that. But DO you want a real investigation? Otherwise, of course you fear the truth. And not even comprehending why you do is part of your own psychological self protection.
Thetan1974 4 months ago
@Thetan1974 why should I not want another investigation? Go ahead, but I am not in charge of saying a new investigation should be done. Questions raise though, who would be qualified as an independent researcher who would really investigate what was going on? Who has to expertise to go through all the different complex subjects? Ask those you think are unbiased to do an investigation. Could be costly though...nonetheless you have my blessings to investigate.
Caellest89 4 months ago
@Caellest89
Why you shouldn't want a new investigation? Because you're a debunker denying the signs of controlled demolition and because you only want to stay anonymous and explain away the unexaplained phenomenons on YouTube. regular Debunk behaviour. But I think it's super cool if you truly don't fear a new investigation. Of you even WANT it, that would be honorable. But to be honest: Don't you believe that "Osama & the 19 Hijackers" did it?
Thetan1974 4 months ago
@Thetan1974 It doesn't seem to make sense to you. Even when I tell you, you keep insisting that I don't want a new investigation. I am not denying the signs of controlled demolition. I have looked at them thoroughly, analyzed them systematically, interpreted them systematically, but always found that there was no evidence to support it. Anyway let's try a different approach. What evidence still holds which we did not discuss yet?
Caellest89 4 months ago
@Caellest89
It doesn't seem to make sense to you that the official story is an unproven, scientifically conflicting fairy tale created to namely make you believe in the Ghost of Osama bin Laden - and if you have the scientific facts that contradicts that fairy tale, you can't handle it and sadly find yourself debating hours on end to not end up at mental care. On YouTube and as the great "Caellest89."
Thetan1974 4 months ago
@Caellest89
I don't really know why you think that "debating" with ONE single individual, who have told you several times wht you can work on to convince him of your official religion - without doing so - is going to help you. But it must do in some way. It's psychologiically interesting and I hope the audience enjoy the show.
"Anyway let's try a different approach"
My god, your desperate in trying to convince me about the unexaplainable - in the ever religious CLAIM way. It's crazy.
Thetan1974 4 months ago
@Thetan1974 funny to see your way of discussing. From presenting 'evidence' you go to saying 'take it up with experts from AE911thruth' and things like 'the great Caellest89'. I do have to thank you if you think I am too great for you to handle. Seems like you have nothing to say against the explanations I have given to you.
Caellest89 4 months ago
@Caellest89
Funny to see how you dodge and twist things to stay in your matrix; I say: IF you have any rebuttals and/or explainations - scientifically and peer reviewed - for the faults of the AE 911 Truth scientists and th eunexplained phenomenons, present them to AE911Truth. You still don't get it. I have all the evidence for CD's I need. Your CLAIMS/thoughts/ religious guessings are not scientific facts.
Kids who don't understand can also be "too great to handle."
Thetan1974 4 months ago
@Thetan1974 People are already taking up with AE 911 Truth, but doesn't make a difference. Even when presented with facts people like you remain in denial. See my post on your demolition 'evidence'. I'll post it again for your attention
Caellest89 4 months ago
@Thetan1974 I have explained that there were no sound recordings. The best sound recording is the one from the actual INSIDE of the WTC by one of the Naudet brothers. Also I can give you tons of examples of people describing hearing 'explosions' while clearly there were no explosions. What we know also, from psychological tests, is that testimonies like William Rodriquez change over time. What else is left? Where is the hard (!) proof, apart from witnesses only describing hearing explosions?
Caellest89 4 months ago
@Caellest89
Even if those tops of the buildings were heavy enough to press their way down through the path of greatest resistance - which they of course weren't, but lets pretend they were - they still wouldn't cause what we witnessed. There's absolutely no explaination for those phenomenons. Only a criminal cover-up and a denial of investigating them and even admitting to some of them.
I explain excactly to the audience why you fear the Truth. I don't expect YOU to grasp it.
Thetan1974 4 months ago
@Thetan1974 how would you tell that it could not happen? Name any event in which a plane struck a building at around 800 km/h and the building collapsed which was totally different from what we saw at 9/11? You talk about the top of the building as if it should have gone side-ways. Ofcourse not. The only force acting on it, is gravity. The weakest part of the structure ofcourse fails first, but the chain of events happens in a blink of an eye.
Caellest89 4 months ago
@Caellest89
"how would you tell that it could not happen?"
As most people watching the events that day, I couldn't tell "It could not happen." Like everyone else, I was decieved into believeing that it happened from the planes and fires. Who NOW tell you that it could not happen is the experts above - and they tell you EXCACTLY how it could not happen. Hmm... I get the feeling that you didn't watch the docu? Afraid of the facts again...?
Thetan1974 4 months ago
@Caellest89
"You talk about the top of the building as if it should have gone side-ways"
I talk about them NOT being able to forcer their way down through the path of greatest resistance and at the same time cause the unexplained phenomenons. It's a easy as that. Whether they would just fall down and rest on the lower parts or whether they would go side-ways is for the experiment in which you fly a 767 into a WTC like building WITHOUT any demolition devises in the building. Capice?
Thetan1974 4 months ago
@Thetan1974 greatest resistance doesn't mean it is insurmountable. The forces involved in 9/11 are almost incomprehensible. Anyway, repeating the events of 9/11 would never repeat a similar outcome. That is simply impossible. Let Tiger woods hit the same hole in one at the some golf tournament he once did. You'll never ever will be able to duplicate it.
Caellest89 4 months ago
@Caellest89
"Greatest resistance" means that counting in the core of the buildings, there's absolutely NO way the tops became heavy enough to both force their way down through the buildings at hear free fall AND cause the unexplaned phenomenons. NIST don't even re-explain their debunked pan cake theory. They're in deep waters.
" Let Tiger woods hit the same hole in one at the some golf tournament he once did"
Jesus - going ooon and on and on with unscientific blah-blah as Caellest98 on YouTube.
Thetan1974 4 months ago
@Thetan1974 WTC 1 & 2 did not fall at free fall speed.You also seem to be pretty fed up with 'caellest89'(!) (not 98) on Youtube, while you are Thetan1974 here on youtube taking on with me. Go ahead, walk away if you don't want to discuss it anymore. Go ahead, take it up with all those real experts who investigated 9/11. Those are your own words. Please don't bother me if you can't take it that you have nothing to stand on anymore! Go away if you had enough...goodbye!
Caellest89 4 months ago
@Caellest89
I didn't say that 1 and 2 free falled. They were "near." And the speed of ehich they crumbled could not have happened form the tops. Again: the tops simply weren't heavy enough to force their way down through the lower much stromger parts.
Besides that, the experts above tell you EXCACTLY why the NIST reports are unscientific.
And besides THAT, even a child can see that these buildings collapse in an unnatural way with explosive force. The south tower desintegrades in mid air (etc)
Thetan1974 4 months ago
@Thetan1974 Maybe it got lost in the series of post shortly after each other, but tell me. What evidence still holds the use of explosions?
Caellest89 4 months ago
@Caellest89
"What evidence still holds the use of explosions?"
Ahh, you like the Repeat Game? But it's fair enough as some new "viewers" of our "discussion" hopefully have come by lately:
Evidence of explosions is the 120+ witness testemonies of it. Most notably form Kevin McPadden
The sound recordings of it
You Want links again?
Thetan1974 4 months ago