Added: 5 years ago
From: weza3
Views: 105,654
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (1,189)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • The Pratt/Whitney and the Rolls-Royce engines are TURBO-FAN designs, meaning that a relatively small core jet turbine is turning a 7-foot (2-m) shrouded fan. The turbine blade core in the photograph (minus the blades) fits the dimensions of such an engine. The next time you go to the airport, try sighting down inside a modern turbofan engine, as in any Airbus or late-model Boeing product. You will see it's mostly hollow inside. Big fan/small engine.

  • A level headed person would then assume one of two things...either they are stupid beyond belief or they are lying. Rationale lends me to the answer that the pentagon and those who occupy it aren't stupid by any means and given the fact that are government has a proven history of lying...it begs the questions....why would they lie and what are they lying about?

  • A jet plane engine rotor in the wreckage of the Pentagon? This means that a jet plane of some kind had to have hit the Pentagon! I would agree, but when the engine rotor found could not possibly be the rotor of the plane they said it was, something is wrong.....(continued)

  • twoofers fail at physics, as does this guy, he doesn't understand the basics of f=ma...

  • @Oz1976 now aplie that F=MA to the wtc. 1,2 and seven than good luck calling us a fail. and facepalm yourself whilst your at it

  • @dogsofwarclan it's been done and proven...you're an idiot...(debunking911 . com) has done all of that...learn to read and comprehend. 10 years, you could have an engineering degree by now and realize your utter fucking stupidity. 10 years...zero whistleblowers. 10 years...ZERO scientific backing. 10 years of duuuuuuuuuhhhhhh

  • Level headed thinkers say….

    A jet plane engine rotor in the wreckage of the Pentagon? This means that a jet plane of some kind had to have hit the Pentagon!

    Stupid Liberal Sheep say….

    A jet plane engine rotor in the wreckage of the Pentagon? That engine rotor is not from a 757 that means it was a missile that hit the Pentagon!

    Stupid Fucks….. !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • What a jackass, the mass of the jet has to continue on until it stops.

    That's why hes a reporter and not an ENGINEER !!

  • If that's the case, why isn't anybody doing anything about it? Other than sit there and show off this ransom?

  • At one time EVERYONE just knew the earth was flat...Love how name calling replaces facts and creditable arguments. Oh and a Boeing 757 NEVER hit the pentagon. Silly me...I believe my lying eyes. Now bring on the hate.

  • You have to reach the rank of Captain Dickhead before correcting peoples spelling mistakes.. Google chrome underlines spelling mistakes for you and corrects them if you choose it to.. I choose not to be a wannabe spelling B champ

  • truthers are retards

  • @terrymanning1 Your a retard

  • @Oskadella69 You mean *You're*. Proof that "truther" retards can't even spell.

  • @terrymanning1 no u r

  • watch?v=3ujWitEr-Ww

  • "THE ENTIRE SCIENTIFIC WORLD IS PART OF THE CONSPIRACY"

    And you poor, bewildered conspiracy freaks wonder why the world is laughing at you and not one scientific publication takes any of your babble seriously.

    Borrow a quarter and buy a clue.

  • @blueshark69 Fact is very few people in the scientific world have studied it, and those given the task did not even do a complete investigation. I mean virtually all the steel was taken away and ship to china to be recycled before the investigation could even look at it so to include the entire scientific community is silly nonsense.. One thing is 100% certain is the law of motion says it is impossible for the smaller upper section to implode the lower larger section at free fall speed.

  • I used to work at a General Electric Plant where we would recondition Jet Engine Blades and what this narrator and "John W. Brown" are saying is moronic at best. Of course it is not going to be six feet. First, I don't see any blades around the cone because it goes INSIDE the fan housing. The cone one sees In many diagrams of a RR engine is the outside cone and is pointed for aerodynamic purposes whereas the one pictured above is not. DEBUNKED!

  • a small retired military jet

  • Hmmm...where is the fueled stored in jet liners?  In the wings you moron!

  • @DARTHMOBIUS Are you going to tell us why you lied about Nathan Lomba being a structural engineer?

    You've been running away from this for three weeks, you Eurotrash faggot.

  • Since no scientist or engineer who has EVER published a paper in a mainstream engineering journal has ever claimed the towers were taken down by demo ... you Truthie freaks really need to hunt up some REAL scientists and engineers who actually DO have a reputation.

    Oh wait ... those are the guys who are all laughing at you.

    Never mind.

  • @blueshark69 the problem with people like you, is you don't consider things facts until they are said or published by mainstream outlets. The issue their is the people who own mainstream had their hands in the 9/11 attacks...so with your train of thought, you'll never see those facts. You can see what you're not looking for. If you just believe the 9/11 Commission Report, then that's your choice. I prefer to keep truth as authority rather then the other way around.

  • @JJbones88 "the people who own mainstream had their hands in the 9/11 attacks"

    You Konspiracy Kunts get more stupid each passing week.

    In other words, the leftwing media, that hates Bush's guts, got together to cover up the biggest crime in history, just to keep Bush out of prison and in the White House, and get him reelected. Do you even listen to the nonsense you spout?

    That doesn't even pass the giggle test.

  • Whatever bro, keep thinking your perfect government cares about your well-being. False flag attacks are fake? Fine, live in your box, watch FOX NEWS and think you know whats going on in the world. Do what you feel is best.

    There are many things missing in the 9/11 Commission report, and if you think your government is protecting you by keeping it secret for 10 years, there are people who lost a loved one, who want answers.

  • @JJbones88 "Whatever bro"

    That's about the usual idiotic response one expects from a Truthie Culter. You can't even defend your stupid scenario, so you start whining about the 9/11 families (as if I give a fuck). So far you can't find one of them who claims WTC was a demo, but eventually you'll dig up some idiot in the group.

    Can't expect much from a teenage punk anyhow.

  • @blueshark69 Lol you're pretty interesting, because I choose not to act formal in my response I'm a teenage punk. There are plenty of families who think it was a demo as well as architects. Believe whatever you want, just remember that war is big business, and makes people a shitload of money. Why the fuck would a plane magically hover 10 feet above ground at 500 mph to hit the direct side of the Pentagon, why not just fly straight into it, nose dive? Why don't they realize more videos?

  • @blueshark69 Honestly the official version of events is far more ludicrous than the so called conspiracy theory. They are the only steel and concrete buildings in history to collapse due to fire, and it was previously considered impossible.. hmm maybe that is why we use steel pots and pans you think ?. Invisible jumbo jet, cameras were broken that day, no passengers, no luggage, no titanium bladed 757 engines, no black box, no wing, no damage to lawn. another previously impossible world first

  • @KungFriedChicken "no black box"

    Bumbling fool. Even the Truthie cult websites have been arguing about the analysis of the black box for the past ten years. Are you the only idiot that thinks it wasn't found?

  • @blueshark69 not the one from the 757 no :) or is it 2 ?.. one for flight one for voice.. so where is the wreckage anyway?.. usually they reconstruct the plane the best they can using all the debis.. but the debris doesnt add up. Be too easy just to show the footage of all the seized cameras that day including ones on the highway. but every camera is broken that day of course.. any real evidence has been taken out of the picture and apparently doesnt exist. All thats left is hearsay :)~

  • I should of said steel frame buildings. Every expert on the matter knows it would a death nail to your career to dispute the government. I mean if you know they just killed 3000 citizens and also happen to be the most powerful people in the world, with an infinite arsenal of life ending abilities, you probably might keep ya mouth shut you think? losing your job would be the least of your worries. Much worse than pissing off the mafia I'd imagine.

  • @KungFriedChicken "I should of said steel frame buildings"

    Which only makes you look dumber, if you think these were the only steel frame buildings to ever collapse from fire. I found quite a few in 60 seconds. What the fuck's wrong with you?

    Got any explanation for why your lame-ass "architects & engineers" still can't get an engineering analysis written & published anywhere, in ten years of desperate trying?

    Is it the laughter of their peers that is slowing them down?

    ROFLMAO

  • @KungFriedChicken "I should of said steel frame buildings"

    Which only makes you look dumber, if you think these were the only steel frame buildings to ever collapse from fire. I found quite a few in 60 seconds. What the fuck's wrong with you?

    Got any explanation for why your lame-ass "architects & engineers" still can't get an engineering analysis written & published anywhere, in ten years of desperate trying?

    Is it the laughter of their peers that is slowing them down?

    ROFLMAO

  • @blueshark69 no you didnt another lie. paste the link and I bet you found some absolutely nothing on this scale.

  • @KungFriedChicken "it would a death nail to your career"

    I love it when you 8th grade dropouts try to use words you don't even understand.

    "Death nail" ----- bwaaaahaahahahahahahaha

    I love it when you phony

  • @blueshark69 so i left out a word (be).. it would be.. woppy doo.. I love how dipshits such as yourself accuse others of being 8th graders, yet offer nothing more than childish dribble and an exagerated typed expression of your laugh. Another thing anal priness, shoud it be 'I love it when you're phony' ?

  • Check out the pentagon conspiracy in the Aimed At America 1 video. When will all these parallels stop being coincidences?

  • @vincent15641 /watch?v=Et24DokEvTE <- this?

  • I'm glad the "truth" movement is almost dead. Right now it's on life support. And no I am not an "agent".

  • At :21 he asks "if the wings broke off, why don't we see wing parts in the photos". Then when they continue the animation, it shows all the broken pices going into the building. The animation answers his question. No planers have a hard time understanding this point. They think if the wings broke off that they would stop and remain intact outside the building. The animation shows that they would keep going and fragment inside. Maybe the tips wouldn't get in, but they would break up into confetti

  • Ten years, and the Truth Fairies are still trying to find evidence for a bunch of cameras at the Pentagon that didn't exist.

  • @AngryOprichnik "not Rolls Royce"

    Another lying Russian fuck, who can't tell one engine from another. The aerospace engineers at AerospaceWeb clearly identify it as a Rolls-Royce engine out of a Boeing 757.

    Link to proof: tinyurl (dot) com/gy2zl

  • @MsgtSpook Fine, that means that there is no conspiracy, and Bush has done everything right. Congratulations. :)))))

  • @MsgtSpook

    So the only steel experts the Truthies can find now are a couple of French fag film students, and PlaguePuppy, who barely has a Bach. degree in ELECTRICAL engineering.

    I guess if a short in the WTC doorbells caused the collapse, PlaguePuppy is definitely your man.

    Big shocker that NIST won't let these hack amateurs go pawing through the evidence.

  • @blueshark69 ACTUALLY FEMA MANIPULATED THE BPAT TEAM IN TO BEING INEFFECTUAL AND ALSO 'GAGGED' WITH CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENTS APENDIX D OF THE REPORT STATES HOW THEY WERE NOT ALLOWED ACCESS TO THE STEEL, The Science Committee of the House of Representatives later identified several aspects of the FEMA-controlled operation that prevented the conduct of an adquate investigation WHICH INCLUDED BUT WAS NOT LIMITED TO THE BREACH OF NFPA 921 REGULATION. SO THE GOVERNMENTS OWN PEOPLE WERE TOLD NO.

  • Are you ever going to explain why cameras easily visible to the public are part of some National Security secret that no one is allowed to discuss?

    You claim to have seen them -- a ridiculous lie -- yet they are also somehow super-secret?

    So far you're unable to even show a contract that forbids discussing ANYTHING, let alone shit that anyone could look at every day -- if it existed.

    Tens of thousands of tourists taking pictures of the Pentagon every month but not one shot of cameras?

  • @MsgtSpook "Tens of thousands of tourists taking pictures of the Pentagon every month but not one shot of cameras?"

    Gee - u mean u don't believe FartMorphius actually saw cameras at the Pentagon?

    Just because he lies most of the time doesn't mean it's EVERY time.

  • @MsgtSpook You have no basis to accost me with the rediculous acusation of lying, You and the rest of the morrons keeps insisting that the government building known as The Pentagon, housing state secrets and administers to America's military forces has practically no security and HR protocols and no cameras bar on a few gates, it's preposterous. There are signs at the station which state no photography, but people still do. Read the espionage act FFS I prooved the cameras exist so you FAIL.

  • @DARTHMOBIUS "Pentagon,... has practically no security"

    Another lie. You just never listen.

    There were no outside cameras covering the perimeter on 9-11.  There was no reason for them, and no one has ever provided the slightest evidence for them. Showing old grainy photos of light fixtures and claiming they must be cameras doesn't impress anyone.

    What purpose would outside cameras serve when armed guards are already there?

    Photographs INSIDE the Pentagon were always forbidden.

  • @blueshark69 You still can't even actively read properly, quote mining out of context and missrepresenting facts yet again the same old claim that the replacement 360* bubble security cameras are light fixtures when its plainly clear that is not the case prooves just how much your all full of shit and desperate to protect your failing asses.

    Actually the outer perimeter covering Guard house footage on 9/11 just pwned you. Give Up You Can't Beat Me. No Matter How Hard You Try To Wheezle Your BS.

  • @DARTHMOBIUS "outer perimeter covering Guard house footage on 9/11"

    So what the fuck is that ... something else you made up, like the nonsense word wheezle?

    You retarded little kids can call it a camera, or a canteloupe, or your shriveled little cunt. Doesn't change the fact that everyone else knows it's a light fixture & is still laughing.

  • @blueshark69 Wow you really are all 31 flavours of dumb ass, you stated " There were no outside cameras covering the perimeter on 9-11 " So the 4 frames of footage the government released and there's been much controversy over did'nt happen? Yeah right, You Sir Are A Buffoon. I have already prooved via Links of detailed photogrpahs of the CBC 360* all view security cameras and you reprehensibile morons keep insisting are light fixtures, No Matter Your Capperings You FAIL.

  • @DARTHMOBIUS "Links of detailed photogrpahs of the CBC 360* all view security cameras"

    Too bad you are afraid to link to anything except grainy, out-of-focus views of light fixtures. You can pretend they're cameras or purple giraffes, but no one else believes you.

    The parking lot camera was covering the lot entrance, not the Pentagon perimeter. Even its photos were clearer that the grainy shit you pretend is a camera.

  • @MsgtSpook I'm going to go one better than a Link I'll do a Video, your humiliation is going to be delicious.

  • @DARTHMOBIUS "You have no basis to accost me with the rediculous acusation of lying"

    Why did you tell us Lomba was a structural engineer? The little fuck is just a Civil Engineer, licensed by California, as shown on their website.

  • @MsgtSpook Because He was listed as a 'Consultant' and I am Enjoying ripping the piss out of you. You keep insisting that any scientists / engineers / Professionals have to meet YOUR specifications to qualify for any commentary on the subject of 9/11 When 38,000 "engineers" consulted by NIST were just civil engineers and not structural engineers, oh did I just say too much? Nah, You morons make me laugh with your insistance for your Official Line as IF I'm going to change.

  • @DARTHMOBIUS "as IF I'm going to change"

    Teenage zealots who believe in UFO conspiracies and 9-11 delusions will never change.

    They only add humor value to Engineering 101 classes.

  • @MsgtSpook As if your an engineer, oh probably several decades senior to you to boot and not some prissy tween minded biggot who's FAILED at life like you.

  • @MsgtSpook Here's the security cameras you claim don't exist /watch?v=ubQQgzWJ6Qs tourist photographs. Due to your logical falacy you have transposed your own claims as one of my claims, after all you claimed your the paper work 'expert' but yet have no idea what the espionage act entails which all government employees with a security clearence 'sign' Pop by the pentagon sometime and ask one fo the guys on duty the details of security protocols & tech used eg facial recog etc.

  • Since no scientist or engineer who has EVER published a paper in a mainstream engineering journal has ever claimed the towers were taken down by demo ... you really need to hunt up some REAL scientists and engineers who actually DO have a reputation.

    Oh wait ... those are the guys who are all laughing at you.

  • @MsgtSpook Mainstream engineering journals WILL NOT publish any materials contrary to the opinion demanded by those whom control consensus, NS magazine refused to publish and only presented on how it was TREASON to REASON that 9/11 happened any other way and that was 3 years on, your argument for REAL is the materialists proponents of reputation alone, we demand the forum be opened for the truth and you rebuke by refusing the forum be opened claiming we're lunatics your the ones living in fear.

  • @DARTHMOBIUS "Mainstream engineering journals WILL NOT publish any materials contrary to the opinion demanded"

    So exactly who has the Iranian an North Korean and Chinese publications scared so bad that they won't publish something implicating the US gov't?

    Your claim is patently absurd, as well as clinically paranoid.

  • @MsgtSpook "who has the Iranian an North Korean and Chinese publications scared so bad that they won't publish"

    It must be the Jew bankers and the Freemasons. For the lunatic fringe, it always comes down to those, or the flying saucer alien invaders.

  • @MsgtSpook quote me correctly or not at all, well for the lulz lets pwn you again, no one else other than you is stating such nation states are exactly so scared, North Korean, Chinese and Iranian officials have already published statements on US Gov't implications, adventurism and globaly corporate piracy, but you write that off as just good ol fassioned anti-americanism or it never happened, so patently absurd in what context ? - only in the vulgar delusions of a fake government agents mind.

  • @DARTHMOBIUS "North Korean, Chinese and Iranian"

    Try answering a straight question for a change.

    There are thousands of N Korean, Chink and Iranian structural engineers. Since they're obviously not afraid of retaliation, why do you suppose that not one of them has offered a rebuttal for NIST, or suggested an alternative theory, like demolition?

    You imply that US & European engineers are afraid to publish alternative theories, so why don't the usual America-haters sign up for your lunacy?

  • @MsgtSpook but no questions are straight, perhaps just may be they're like all really busy not giving a shit as they have 'more' pressing matters to attend to like the 15 hour shifts 7 days a week, or may be just may be they have and thanks to google and its censorship policy we just dont get to see it, you know next time im in north korea; china or may be even Iran I might make the effort to find out.

  • @DARTHMOBIUS "15 hour shifts 7 days a week"

    Your tough shifts at the fish & chips joint are hardly relevant.

    You claim some mysterious evil force is preventing engineers from disputing NIST in scientific venues, and when it's pointed out that this is absurd because America's worst enemies (after the Eurotrash) won't publish your lunacy, you don't even get the point.

  • @blueshark69 Actually I work in Web Development, not that scum like you work at all, "mysterious evil force" Your certainly not living in the real world I've already answerd the questions any way No I Dont Claim some mysterious evil force I clearly stated that those whom OWN the publishing houses and thusly OWN the general consensus WILL NOT allow publication.

  • @DARTHMOBIUS "those whom OWN the publishing houses and thusly OWN the general consensus WILL NOT allow publication"

    So each of the hundreds of universities and hundreds of engineering schools & dozens of engineering societies each decided, all by itself, to blackball the Truthy shit?

    Why? They're jealous of those chemists, surveyors and theology professors, and their fabulous engineering insights?

    Why won't Herrit's own university publish his papers?

  • @DARTHMOBIUS "I work in Web Development"

    Whoopee. Which means you're about as qualified to write engineering papers as those ae911truth phonies ... chemists, solar film developers, surveyors, irrigation designers, etc.

  • @DARTHMOBIUS "Mainstream engineering journals WILL NOT publish any materials contrary to the opinion demanded by those whom control consensus"

    Give even one example of a paper that was rejected, and by whom. Exactly who do you claim is the Great Secret Cabal pulling all these strings all over the world, in every university, engineering company, or scientific publication.

  • @MsgtSpook F Legge's co-written paper will not be published by Popular Mechanics etc even though Legge highlists NIST's lying about the WTC steel on pg 180 - 181 in comparison with FEMA 403 ES, 2.

  • @DARTHMOBIUS "Legge's co-written paper will not be published"

    Not likely to be published by anyone since he's a chemist with ZERO engineering or physics background, pretending he understands collapse physics.

    Until he gets someone actually qualified to back up his silliness, it wouldn't get past peer review in the worst backwoods college engineering school, let along a publication with actual standards.

    Might as well just have your local plumber analyse the collapse.

  • @DARTHMOBIUS "F Legge's co-written paper will not be published by Popular Mechanics"

    He couldn't get it published anywhere except maybe MAD magazine, since he doesn't have any experience or education remotely relevant to what he's babbling about. Obviously even his own university wouldn't publish it either, which is pretty laughable.

  • Shit, I guess he's running out of high-class "experts." First he tries to flop out Ventura as an explosives expert, and got laughed at.

    So he floats Grimmer as a great engineering guru, until it turns out that he wouldn't know a building from a bearclaw & all he's ever worked with is solar collector film.

    Now Donly, who of course is a barely-qualified housebuilder with no structural credentials & not a published paper to his name in his entire life.

    Who's next -- Donald Duck? Elmer Fudd?

  • @blueshark69 Stop with the BULLSHIT I mentioned Ventura purely for a TV show presenting 9/11 information, Grimmer's a scientist and changing his position to suit your vitriolic agenda does'nt change the fact he knows his kung-fu and to denigrate Donly who's only two steps away from a PHD presents just how your missrepresenting facts. Gee whats next? Trysts with McVeigh? ISI sponsor me to be dissinfo agent? What other coddswallop are you going to thrust around YT's faces?

  • @DARTHMOBIUS "Ventura ... Grimmer ... Donly"

    Still waiting for you to find somebody, somewhere, who has the balls to publish your maniacal theories.

    Since neither Donly or Grimmer are even remotely qualified to study or analyze collapse mechanics or structural engineering, they are afraid to publish, like the rest of those phony "experts" in your cult.

  • @DARTHMOBIUS

    I'll make it simple for you:

    Why are your pathetic "experts" unable to publish anything, in ten years?

  • @BlazingFerret what Maniacle theories? These guys are on on mainstream media outlets presenting their facts, they publish both online and hard copy and still they haven't published anything in ten years? Damn, reality must have really changed when I went all black ops and stepped off world with the Tier 1 Aliens again ROFL, you keep claiming there's nothing yet you can pick up a book in waterstones, oh for boif msgtspook his kindle will probably have a pay per view in a couple of months lol

  • @DARTHMOBIUS "they publish both online and hard copy"

    So posting on some obscure website is what you call "publication?" Why are they afraid to publish in engineering or scientific publications? There are a couple of hundred MAJOR ones just in the US, but not a thing from the Truthy Cult.

    Either you are bone-ignorant about what constitutes scientific publication, or you're being deliberately obtuse to hide your embarrassment at their failure to produce anything.

  • @MsgtSpook they are'nt afraid but your MAJOR publications REFUSE to publish, and not all of them are obscure webpages like your sacred SECB page which has all the professionalism of the westboro baptist church propaganda sheet. pay your fee take an exam your a pro if you back us up.

  • @DARTHMOBIUS "your MAJOR publications REFUSE to publish"

    Who is forcing them to refuse?

    Why are you unable to answer this question, despite being asked several times?

  • @blueshark69 I thought I already had; those whom control 'general consensus' surely you can't be that fucking stupid. Oh yeas you are, well those whom answer to the actual owners of the product dictate policy. Proof? how about you email any mainstream publication and try to have an article published advocating the question of the 9/11 official report see how far you get.

  • @DARTHMOBIUS "those whom control 'general consensus"

    Who the fuck are you talking about ... Illuminati, Jew bankers, Republicans, shapeshifting aliens from the planet Sculfuck?

    You're the one who brought it up, saying everything is controlled by some mysterious secret group. Now you're afraid to back it up.

  • @blueshark69 "Illuminati, Jew bankers, Republicans, shapeshifting aliens from the planet Sculfuck"

    That's the suspect list of most of the Truthies.

    Now watch this pansy mince around and around,NOT telling us who the great evil overlords are.

  • So far you snivel along, still afraid to answer why you have no published studies, afraid to tell us why TImmy is relevant, or the aliens.

    Why so afraid? Is it just the usual Dutch reaction to everything?

  • @MsgtSpook Afraid of what? I dont actually 'fear' any way I gave you links to published studies and you claimed otherwise, I never said aliens were relevant you and your cohorts keep on insisting on somethign you invented and I commented on, just explained in another post about Timmy, funny how the person it started with had no idea how it started and it was his question in the first place lol pure comedy gold.

  • @blueshark69 Of cause your incapable of naming a single legitimate researcher who's been given access, and any researcher's names I propose you deem a retort by slanderous comment, hence forth a toxic dialogue; Ultimately going no where.

  • From 9 11 research dot wt7 dot net you can view photographs of plane wreckage from inside the pentagon as well as bodies. I don't know how I stand on the issue, but does anyone care to reply with an opinion on this?

  • Why no wing parts in your photographs? Cause your photographs suck. Get better photographs and you'll eliminate that problem. Keep in mind that even after these wing parts broke off, they were still traveling close to 500 miles an hour. Don't expect to see much.

  • @DARTHMOBIUS "Why was a hydrolic pump from a different type plane in the wreckage?"

    You claim this actually happened?

    You're fucking nuts.

  • @blueshark69 "You're fucking nuts"

    He lost his marbles long ago, like all the UFO freaks. He thinks every light in the sky is some scary NWO device, so he hides under his bed and quivers in fear.

    His videos are hilarious, as he tries to pretend he's two things he's not -- literate, and white.

  • @blueshark69 OK how about Dubya Bush's maid ? Oh thats right she got run over by her own car on her drive way, gee happens all the time nothing questionable about that.

  • @DARTHMOBIUS "how about Dubya Bush's maid"

    So tell us all about this mysterious conspiracy involving Bush's maid, and why she had to be secretly murdered.

    Or is this just more strawman bullshit to cover the fact your weird little cult has found no evidence of jack shit in over a decade of frantic trying?

  • @blueshark69 Research the material before trying to dismantle the dialogue.

  • There has always been a tiny subspecies of humanity whose deep-seated paranoia and hatred won't let them look at two dogs screwing in the street without seeing some giant conspiracy behind it.

    Fortunately, it's a self-limiting phenomenon since most of them are the least likely to ever find a breeding female or hold a job of any significance.

    Which is another reason they channel their energy into silly shit like the Truthie Cult.

  • @blueshark69 "won't let them look at two dogs screwing in the street without seeing some giant conspiracy behind it"

    For most of the Truthie Sheeple that's as close to sex as they're ever liable to get.

    For Pakistani wogs like BarfMoronius, of course, they're more used to camels and goats as the high end of their sexual conquests.

    Damned embarrassing for the camels & goats, of course.

  • @MsgtSpook this the only insults you have? Oh well stands to reason with such viral scum. The limitation of intellect; whit and critical thinking, always debases thusly bown to a barage of insults and disinfo with such egregious impertinance, 'tis been fun manipulating your psyche, the typo's, the incredulous missuse of the bastard language of europe. The truth is I'm actually Dutch, I don't particularly like animals, thricely divorced with 5 dependants so that dismantles your BS.

  • @DARTHMOBIUS

    So is it really your theory that your buddy Timmy was killed by Tier 1 or Tier 2 aliens? We're waiting for the exciting details on these extraterrestrial villains.

    Maybe Dr. Grimmer can go thru drug rehab and write a paper for us on these marvelous intergalactic creatures, both regular and half-robotic.

  • @blueshark69 Aliens have nothing to do with Timmy, but your comment has the makings of another dodgy alien invasion flick which your generation are so obsessed about. Perhaps you should direct your energies in to writing a script instead of trying to proove your somehow interlectually, morally and ethically superior when all of your actions here reveal just how far removed you are from such a lofty position. Aspiring does'nt cut it in scientific process.

  • @DARTHMOBIUS "Aliens have nothing to do with Timmy"

    And you're still afraid to tell us why "Timmy" has anything the fuck to do with 9-11.

  • @DARTHMOBIUS "alien invasion flick which your generation are so obsessed about"

    You're the one who claims to be the big expert on Tier 1 and Tier 3 extraterrestrials.

    Which is another reason everyone thinks you're insane.

  • @BlazingFerret "claims to be the big expert on Tier 1 and Tier 3 extraterrestrials"

    He haunts other websites babbling about being a big expert on different types of extraterrestrial, to impress kids even younger and stupider than he is.

    Now he's embarrassed because he got caught again, and won't discuss aliens, or who killed Timmy, or why he can't find any engineers who can read and write.

  • @BlazingFerret "the big expert on Tier 1 and Tier 3 extraterrestrials"

    Now the Pakki poseur is embarrassed at getting caught being a flaming UFO nutcase, so he just won't respond as to why he knows so much about classifying ETs.

    I think someone stuck their anal probe too far up this boy, at some point, and it affected his brain.

  • @blueshark69 Scientists with peer reviewed 'Authority' enter the euphemistic foray of 9/11 investigation Only to be annihilated by all and sundry. NIST failed and have taken a serious dent in credibility also, and your 'Authority' gang hang on their every word as sacrosanct gospel, interesting how more money was spent on Clintons Blow Job than 9/11 Investigation, Interesting how key players got to fix the whole thing and remained off record and unimpeachable. Obviously I Know More Than You.

  • @DARTHMOBIUS "I Know More Than You"

    And the entire engineering and scientific community, or so you claim.

    They still cling to that old-fashioned "scientific method" stuff, and peer review of their work, whereas a high school dropout like you can see through all their mistakes, assisted only by a pack of crackpots who have no relevant credentials whatsoever.

  • @DARTHMOBIUS "NIST failed and have taken a serious dent in credibility"

    By whom? That pack of nobodies and frauds on the AE911Truth website? Find even one of them that has a reputation.

    Of course, when you resort to appealing to their nonexistent "authority" it's fine .... but when the rest of the scientific world laughs at them you think the whole world must be wrong since your delusional conspiracy religion has to be the "truth."

  • @blueshark69 If your not familiar with the published articles then you really should'nt try arguing them, reveals just how disenfranchised and delusional you really are.

  • @blueshark69 "your buddy Timmy was killed by Tier 1 or Tier 2 aliens"

    Darthmobius is still trying desperately to run away from his hilarious bullshit about the various flavors of extraterrestrial he is such an expert upon.

    Like birth defects, conspiracy whackjobs never suffer from just one delusion. They buy into the whole shebang -- UFOs, chemtrails, the NWO, Illuminati, vaccine poisoning, etc.

    He brings up this phony crap about some friend getting snuffed mysteriously, and then runs away.

  • @MsgtSpook I actually allready answerd that with your Boif, Blazingfucktard. Try again Mr MsgAmeobaSpook, keep prattling on and may be people will be too lazy to actually follow the thread and diseminate for themselves that your truely a gilded turd and thusly will always be a turd just waiting to be flushed.

  • @MsgtSpook Are you familiar with Geoffrey Chaucer? Or Elizibethan and Victorian English language, In depth that is? Probabably not in any relative means. But let One express when you have the last oh perhaps a mangled construction of at least a couple fo centuaries worth of english language and the logic processes of thinking in extended paragraphs, 500 character limitting comments appears as rational to your species as colourless paint.

  • @DARTHMOBIUS "Are you familiar with Geoffrey Chaucer?"

    Is this the best way you can pussy out now, since you still can't show there were "84 cameras" that caught the impact, and you don't have one structural engineer on the planet who agrees with your adolescent fantasy?

    That might work with those teenage boys you molest, but adults require some sort of proof.

  • 911 Truthers have completely ignored the major role that shape-shifting aliens played on 911.

    911 was an extraterrestrial job!

    Since DarthNutless is an expert on these things, maybe he can tell us whether these are Tier 1 or Tier 2 ETs.

  • DarthHopeless -- so you still have no rebuttal to the AerospaceWeb article?

    Or have you decided it isn't worth lying anymore about non-757 parts found at the Pentagon?

  • @DARTHMOBIUS

    You asked why a hydraulic pump found at the Pentagon was NOT from a 757.

    That's bullshit. There was no such pump found, which you well know since you have been refusing for many days now to provide proof of your sad little lie.

  • @MsgtSpook As I explained in the other comment to you, that was in relation to verifying the extent of your knowledgebase, obviously you were'nt familiar with material One is, but thats ok, at no point did I state I believed that wreckage was not what it was, you assumed and turned a debate in to an argument, Stop with the Strawman antics, after all are'nt you supposed to be the better person and i'm the psycho? Truth is I'm ahead of the curve.

  • @DARTHMOBIUS "at no point did I state I believed that wreckage was not what it was"

    Lying bastard. You said there were photos of a "hydrolic pump" that didn't belong to a 757. Which of course you couldn't produce because you made it all up. And got caught.

    Hasn't it occurred to you yet that you are just not very good at lying? You always get caught.

  • @blueshark69 Can't you bifocal retards Stop With The Strawman, I did not state there were "Photo's" of the pump I implied that there were differences in the pump and that there were photos of the security cameras which people claim do not exist even unto this day, Also YOU FAIL TO Even Rationalise The Dynamic of the Experiment Being Conducted, I supplied the CNN 'Secure' transcript, I Supplied the 'Survailanced' Link, Now The 400 number came from a BBC Journalist IN PERSON. REDACTION Google it.

  • @DARTHMOBIUS "I implied that there were differences in the pump "

    You asked why it wasn't the same as on a 757.

    That was a fucking LIE, and you're still trying to run away from it, sweetcheeks.

    You supplied bullshit, and still can't find one legitimate proof of all those cameras you claim exist, and can't explain why all those invisible cameras don't show up on photos of the Pentagon. Or why no one on earth ever saw those cameras. Or why FOUR HUNDRED fucking cameras would even make sense.

  • @blueshark69 I provided proof of the cameras and the Pentagon's a fucking great big building its not as if they're just going to have cameras by the stationary cupboard now is it. You keep calling legitatmate photographs as not proof which is INSANE I mentioned the 'pump' to msgtspook to verify knowledgebase of debateable information and your taking it out of context as per usualfor left brained bifocal retards do, it is eroneous to conclude the results of an experiment before its run.

  • @DARTHMOBIUS "I mentioned the 'pump' .. to verify knowledgebase"

    You're a liar.

    What you said was that the pump found at the Pentagon was different from the pump in a 757.

    That is a LIE.

  • @BlazingFerret No your the liar taking the material out of context, you suppose I said " What you said was that the pump found at the Pentagon was different from the pump in a 757 "

    I actually posited a QUESTION querieing a 'Hay this true? ' analogy which did not state nor imply nor construde I was actualy infering what you are stating in responce to msgtspooks 'unequivocal; sacrosanct egomaniacle opinionated statements' to another YT user whom he had been beating on.

  • @DARTHMOBIUS "I actually posited a QUESTION querieing a 'Hay this true? ' analogy"

    Another lie. What you asked is "Why was the hydrolic (sic) pump found different from that in a 757"

    You stated it as a fact and asked why the difference. You did NOT ask if it were true. Go back and read it, or preferably have someone who speaks English read it TO you.

  • @MsgtSpook Are You ME ? NO YOU ARE NOT. You have only a Limited supposition of my position which is what ever I DEIGN IT TO BE. You and the rest of the clowns around here allowed YOUR arrogance to assume the 'framing' of the statement and have FAILED.

  • @DARTHMOBIUS "I implied that there were differences in the pump "

    And you're still running away from that lie, too.

    Why is that?

  • @DARTHMOBIUS "it's been prooven we're too dangerous to them in that with many people its shoot / attack first ask questions later... its usually tier2 and tier3's who go in, tier 2's are biomech alien hybrids with some autonomy tier3's are biomechanical robots."

    So this mindless gibberish isn't YOUR delusional statement on extraterrestrials?

    Is some other whackjob posting in your name now?

  • @BlazingFerret Oh I guess there's a rule now that I'm not allowed to paraphrase, quote or parse information from another source. You really are pathetic with these veinglorious puisant maelfescent barrel scrapping attempts at inciting argument and discord, you mean nothing more to my psyche than all those disposable items One tends to forget, you equal no more than mcdonalds packaging or the crud that builds up in a sink sump.

  • @DARTHMOBIUS "veinglorious puisant maelfescent barrel"

    Not bad. Only misspelled three out of four words in a row. Why not just post in your native language, instead?

  • @DARTHMOBIUS

    And why is it you're still afraid to list the researchers who were denied access to the steel structure debris stored at LaGuardia? You know, the stuff your homosexual buddy Ventura was so squiffed up about?

  • @DARTHMOBIUS

    Still looking for that CNN post about 400 cameras? You know -- the one you made up yourself & are now trying desperately to avoid?

  • @MsgtSpook Gee your not keeping up with current events are you, and still are incapable of actively reading. Putz.

  • @DARTHMOBIUS "veinglorious puisant maelfescent barrel scrapping"

    Hahahahahahaha

    Jesus Christ, dutchboy. That's truly remarkable, even if it doesn't mean anything.

  • Comment removed