No, I'm not going to read 1,000 pages of mumblings of people who are trying to deceive idiots. Just paues this very video at 5 seconds. See that piece of debris falling on the right hand side? See it beat the collapse by a country mile? You're debunked.
Yeah, my own private little one that shows the piece of debris at 5 seconds way outpacing the collapse point. That little private one.
2 posts and you've already been reduced to throwing lame insults and blocking me to avoid further embarrassment. Another twoofer debunked, and in record time.
There is no argument. Quite why you want to argue whether the tower descended at free-fall is beyond me. It didn't, though the process of open office space runaway destruction did reach a very fast terminal velocity. Perhaps you should read the links I posted.
Is that why you bloked me, Thedman. So you could run away from the truth ya dumbass?
BlairWitch526 2 years ago
Thedman lives in his own little bubble. He thinks he debunks things, but clearly he`s just an idiot. Dont listen to morons like him.
BlairWitch526 2 years ago
Those items were pushed out at maximum force. No Thedman you didnt debunk anything. Youre just a dumbass!
BlairWitch526 2 years ago
Great shot that clearly shows material off to the sides falling faster than the collapse point, thus debunking "free-fall speed".
thedman113 2 years ago
lol. Fast forward a few years...
the911forum. freeforums. org/wtc1-debris-ejecta-traversal-rate-linear-terminal-velocity-t237. html
the911forum. freeforums. org/wtc1-2-inward-bowing-and-collapse-initiation-models-t274. html
the911forum. freeforums. org/oos-destruction-collapse-model-t264. html
femr2 2 years ago
Good lord dude, ever heard of tinyurl? Wanna just give me the gist of what you're trying to say rather than refer me to hundreds of pages of crap?
thedman113 2 years ago
No. Read.
femr2 2 years ago
No, I'm not going to read 1,000 pages of mumblings of people who are trying to deceive idiots. Just paues this very video at 5 seconds. See that piece of debris falling on the right hand side? See it beat the collapse by a country mile? You're debunked.
thedman113 2 years ago
You must live in your own little private world. Debunked ? About what exactly ? Are you still arguing about "free-fall" speed ?
That's really funny. Bye.
femr2 2 years ago
"You must live in your own little private world."
Yeah, my own private little one that shows the piece of debris at 5 seconds way outpacing the collapse point. That little private one.
2 posts and you've already been reduced to throwing lame insults and blocking me to avoid further embarrassment. Another twoofer debunked, and in record time.
thedman1113 2 years ago
Boring. Who claimed anything regarding free-fall ?
You are quite funny, but an utter waste of my time.
I'll block as many ID's as you care to create.
lol.
femr2 2 years ago
"Who claimed anything regarding free-fall ?'
I claimed it didn't happen, and you tried to argue that point with me.
"I'll block as many ID's as you care to create."
I know you will, because that's what people who know they can't win the argument do. Run away.
dbnkrman 2 years ago
There is no argument. Quite why you want to argue whether the tower descended at free-fall is beyond me. It didn't, though the process of open office space runaway destruction did reach a very fast terminal velocity. Perhaps you should read the links I posted.
You are very very funny, and must be very bored.
Bye.
femr2 2 years ago
great view of the two clearly visible squibs
smitty121981 2 years ago
it's the bryant gumble cbs camera
genghis6l99 2 years ago
Has anyone got a higher quality version of this view please ?
femr2 2 years ago
Should be useful to trace West face lower front ejecta traversal rate...
femr2 2 years ago