aeroplane crashes

[Mr33223322]

Airplane crashes is plural signifying more than one

[sashokkamikaze]

ukraine 2002, airfield in Sknilov

[foreverskydive]

Know it : It's real.

Want a proof ?

Check this video : Sukhoi SU-27 Crash in Detail

Photo should have been taken during 1:13

RIP

[whit101]

Two things: The people seem to be already reacting and there is much dust already in the air. Neither could be the result that jet at the time this photo was taken.

[Lemberg911]

its ukraine lviv  air crash....85 dead

[Sofloh]

nice light saber. oh wait, thats your dislike bar...

[eljuntamillas]

This is not a video, is just a the same pic for 1 minute.

[tlalotoani]

At leats the photo is real, Ukraine, maybe 2005

[PinkPain420]

damn, this is faker than michael jackson's skin color...

but respect for MJ !

[1pnoe]

@PinkPain420 Well michael jackson's skin color must be real then seeing as this picture is legitimate.

[RHINO6383]

I'm looking at it again, It is a still photo because it has been manipulated. The jet size is real, then the "yes" 2 engine cargo aircraft is a model in the photo as Jets are smaller than cargo craft. You have no visual perception. The jet is so much bigger than the cargo plane, Jets are smaller than cargo planes. Yet the people do not match the planes. You need to look at the photo closer and leave your previous thoughts behind you.

[TheTraveller20081]

@RHINO6383 How do I put this? How closed-minded are you? Go & research the Flanker and some twin-prop Eastern Bloc transport aircraft. Su-27, wingspan 48'. By comparison with pictures (fuselage, nacelle shape, tailplane dihedral, even the bubble on the port side nose) I'd say that the transport is an An-26, wingspan 95'. See picture: jet span is approx the same as one wing of transport. They are very close together, because the Su is crashing. Now look up Sknyliv, and be glad you weren't there

[Hallowedsin666]

wie dämlich muss man eig sein um so ein video rein zu stelln

[lawker777]

Chuck Norris's Mig?

[bearscz]

perfect foto

[FORDGTFANATIC]

thats a really big fucking jet! :D

[MrWan3x]

the crashed air-plane's engine is still on. :D is it drilling, or wtf? :D

[DawnEsver]

what a shot in first 10 secs

[hyper2fusion]

Your wrong Rhino, search Su-27 airshow crash!!

BS photo i think not!!

[RHINO6383]

@hyper2fusion .... BRO, LOOK AT THE PHOTO. su27 is not the question, Carefully look at the photo... To the right, You see the wing of a Cargo plane in front of the crash of the aircraft in question, And to the left you see a smaller cargo plane, but in between, you see a huge SU27 crash.... If the photo was correct, the fighter plane should be smaller than the cargo plane you can see to the right. It is not, hence, it is photoshopped for some reason... BS Photo yes!!! Take care.

[TheTraveller20081]

@RHINO6383 - look up Sknyliv Su-27 crash 2002 Ukraine. It's real, and over 80 people on the ground died. FYI - there are no C130s in this picture - count the engines on the small twin in the foreground.

[RHINO6383]

@TheTraveller20081 Open your friggin' eyes.... The visual is a photo, the Flanker is too large to be part of the photo. It can not be an untouched photograph. The cargo aircraft's wing in in the foreground of the crashing aircraft. That would make the cargo aircraft about 10 feet wide, open your eyes and learn some spacial evaluation abilities. Especially before you try to out prove a guy who's been around aircraft for 40 years!

[TheTraveller20081]

@RHINO6383 Well, I'm sorry that you find it so hard to accept that other people might disagree with you. Did you even look up the crash that I described? Secondly, if you've 'been around aircraft for 40 years', how can you confuse the small twin turboprop in the foreground for a C-130, which, last time most of us looked, had 4 turboprops. The Flanker has a wingspan of over 48 feet, which, given the perspective, means that the foreground aircraft could easily have a span of 80', which is plenty

[RHINO6383]

bs photo. The c130 in between the viewer and the target aircraft. The TA, if close to the viewer, would be huge and take up the screen. If this was real, it would be much smaller.

[polarablues64]

@RHINO6383 I agree, doesn't look right.

[fallenchocolate]

it doesnt blow up i remember that the pilot flew very close to a cliff. he also went to jail for that

[Crashman2]

Gee... I guess it blew ALL my speakers... NOT! gimme a break. NO lying titles, OK?

[nessor7913]

that´s very very boring...