Added: 1 month ago
From: TysonCapel23
Views: 1,149
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (22)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • you might be right u mite be wrong, who knows?? I have had good results atomizing water with air from 'hho gas gun' across a (diode + inverter curcuit) running (plasma) plug. The exhaust gas (non combustable gas) is being used to control burn rate! Where as i belive stans system uses a resonant frequancy of pulsed HV,DC to seperate hydroxy gas from water, then burn it on demand ,mine is just another take on an idea. There are thousands of other ideas out there. Be original. Be lucky

  • it is water under pressure!

  • @jef2237 It is under samll amounts of pressure which are produced from the water turning into gas and ambient air which is injected into the spark plug.

  • You're missing one MAJOR point; the injector electrical charge (spark) turns water droplets into individual capacitors just like his later patent the hho fuel injector. That later one uses a mosfet transistor to make a 5ns 8 step 40ns long pump z wave at 30kv 1kw. The caps rotate atomically on linear planes which is how it expands. Nonlinear sep of mass/energy lets h atom grow bigger with longer lines of atomic force. This old design used taper chamber shape to produce similar effect.

  • @tylerdurden666able I'm quite familiar with the Coanda Effect -- I use it in one of my jet engine designs to create a one-way aerodynamic valving effect. I haven't built a Coanda effect aircraft yet but there have been quite a few designed and built (models and full-sized) by others. Even the original Hiller Flying platform relied heavily on the coanda effect.

  • How do you explain how something works, when it does work in the first place?

  • No, your thinking is flawed. If you were able to dissociate steam into H2 and O2 the volume would increase but then, when you recombined them by way of combustion of the H2/O2, the volume would immediately reduce again. This would be an adiabatic process so there would be no overall change in the energy state and thus there would be no Net production of energy.

  • @xjet Not the case acording to Stanley Meyers discoveries. The purpose of using the Ionized gas is to prevent the H and O from recombining. Meyers also discovered that because the H and O would not recombine due to the ionized gases the energy had to go somewhere that somewhere was in the form of electrons thus the purpose for some of his other inventions which would capture the electrons and create electricity.

  • @TysonCapel23 What you forget is that, despite his many followers, Stanley Meyer was a con-man and he *never* delivered any independently reviewed proof of his claims. Meyer's work was soaked in snake-oil and was simply a strategy for separating gullible investors from their hard-earned cash. That's why nobody has been able to duplicate his so-called claims in a way that stands up to independent scrutiny. It's a nice fairy story but that's all I'm afraid.

  • @xjet True. I found that that may be the case when Stan was not able to give a direct answer toward the end of his video titled: Stanley Meyer - 1992 Global Sciences Congress.

  • @xjet I do believe that Stan did run his car entirely off of water. When I said true I was referring to the comment that he never delivered any independently reviewed proof of his claims.

  • @xjet The proof that he told us the truth is in the fact that they killed him.Think very hard about it.If you know his biography ,he made millions from a previous business so he didnt need to steal money.His HHO injector was threatening the big business of oil and the big tax- revenue of governments all over the world( both kind-entities are part of a future NWG).If you seet in a different way is because they are doing it all the time to look that way.Good citizens are threat to emperors!

  • @mika35289 Isn't that the truth. Sad but true.

  • @xjet Give up the adiabatic way of thinking xjet.We know about all of this.The issue is that when you mix the right ingredients like Myers did you retard a bit the reversed process.It doesnt matter how long.In this way you are able to extract the useful power in a fraction of a second before the recombining.Myers didnt tell us but if you are timing the process right after detension you can create vacuum at evacuation by recombination(your adiabatic proces will help at the end of the cicle

  • @xjet Your adiabatic f***ng process(I know is not yours,i*m joking) is helping the engine at the end of the engine cicle(evacuation).Think about it.By reducing the volume you are creating vacuum.When do you need the vacuum?//Look at my answer to you down the tread//If the orthodox laws of science can not be chalenged and changed where would be the progress?Do you think that we are the bearers of eternal thruth?(I know that you know the answers but the question is for th other readers too}

  • @xjet Actually you're very very wrong my friend. During the time of expansion, magnetic current is what's really expanding the hydrogen 1800x. Electrical energy only moves the keystone by allowing the hydrogen to spin on a linear atomic plane so it has time in 2d space to grow longer lines of cyclic monopolar force from atomic centers. Droplets during this time remain ungrounded, so they can gain positive ion charge. Contraction/ expansion of fog in funnel helps orient energy vs/mass particles.

  • @mikefromspace I see where you are coming from and would agree with you, I also do believe there is more to it then just the 1800x expansion in the combustion process. Hydrogen and oxygen were still combusted in the process. I am learning a tone going through Stan's patents and dissecting the information within them. Stan fails to put the same information in his patents which are similar to one another or which have the same devices in them.

  • @TysonCapel23 Ionization of hydrogen is exponential, and literally depends on it's own expansion to expand more. You must allow electrons to push massive particles into lines of force. The more hydrogen can spin on a linear plane, the longer it's lines of force become until it proves it's over efficient nature as a vortexer of time itself. Thermal mesons no longer sit in thermal entropy, but take part in linear magnetic poles spin and counterspin cycling as monopoles.

  • @mikefromspace Thanks for sharing the great information!

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more