This guy dont know what he s talking about, the truth is we are raping planet earth and disturbing it natural law by heat which create global warming. Car and air plane and other great force increase turbulence which create tornado. Up to now scientist have unsolved problem of classical physics but it is all there and even if they did understand it they wouldn't do anything about it. The funny part is they don't even know the cause of tornado!!
The end of the world COULD happen this year 2012 if Iran and EU/Israel get into a war. And there is also a real asteroid (not Nibiru) coming closer to Earth in the next decades. Its has been named Apofhis. And... of course NASA wouldnt say anything IF the world where really in danger. Rationality will always be a self-tranqualizer perspective, an illusion of control and predictiveness covers our most basic fears. Science, just as religions discurse give us sense/meaning to face underlyn Caos.
A war has nothing to do with the 2012 claims, even if it were to coincidentally happen in 2012.
As for Apophis, it was brought to our attention by NASA. So you can claim what NASA would or would not do all you want, you have no evidence for such a claim and the Apophis example serves as refuting evidence.
@ThreeFangCat I believe his claim was based upon rational thinking. If NASA was aware the world was in danger i am certain they would not want to create a widespread panic. There is no way everybody in the world could get enough supplies in order to survive if disaster was to strike. The population is too high, and the amount of resources, although sufficient for the currant way of life, would not be enough to sustain everyone in an end of the world scenario.
1) I was pointing out that regardless of the validity of his supposedly logical construct, history proves him wrong. Information on one of the dangers he lists is fully available from NASA.
2) The 'they wouldn't tell us' story is irrelevant becuase it tells us nothing. Doomsayers neglect to observe that if NASA would logically say the same thing if 2012 claims were false. No conclusion can thus be reached even IF the 'logic' were actually valid.
@ThreeFangCat I dont think anybodys saying theres absolute proof the world is going to end in 2012... Just toying with the idea. Maybe I should just use bigger words like you to make me seem like i know what im talking about..
@mischief658 The most common 2012 claim is for massive death and destruction. Some say they are absolutely right (Patrick Geryl), which others claim the chance is so high that you would be a fool not to 'prepare'. That's not just toying, that is making claims.
And you skipped the point. Whether the 2012 claims are worth acting on is based on the evidence that backs the claims. Evidence, the 'E' word, is the bane of doomsayers everywhere.
@mischief658 This said, the issue of NASA is a sideshow to a much more important issue. Whether 2012 claims are valid is fully dependent on the quality of the supporting evidence. THAT is the real issue, and one that, time and time again, doomsayers have a lot less to say about than weaving conspiracy-laden stories.
@aportela1980 Nice one dummy,Apophis is going to pass by Earth in the year 2029 and return on 2036.And wars are possible but cannot destroy a whole world,the previous World Wars proved that and you betrayed your own self back there by just showing it won't even be a World War.And do you really believe NASA can put a big arse black disk in front of an object and no one notices?One more thing,Religion explains the world around us and Science does it better but makes it look 'unethical'.
the only reason why people are claiming 2012 is the end of the world is simply to make money through false prophecies. Advertising and media attention is what these people want. Everyone knows that it wont be the end of the world. We should stop giving these people the time of day.
@gabigowriel It's not a matter of believing NASA. It's a matter of believing those who make doomsayer claims, but don't bring evidence. If you say NASA lies, can you prove they lie about anything related to the subject material here? Or are you just here to shout accusations and made-up acronyms?
@gabigowriel No. Just saying you have facts that back your accusations is not like actually showing it is true. You're just typical of the type, acting like you don't need to back your claims. If you don't want to respond, fine. I'll just note you have failed to back your claims, and they are now utterly invalid.
Actually it has been a habit of all those morons to end the world every few years lately. I am sure they will find a world in the Bible to sum it up to a nice date as they usually do.
When I was 6 I saw a calendar and saw that the month ended and I was worried that existence was going to end! But then I came to the realization that it was just a calendar. I guess some people just don't learn anything from kindergarten...
Dr. Donald Yeomans says here that the Earth's magnetic poles shift over periods of thousands of years.
Dr. Michio Kaku mentions that the Solar emag. "tsunamis" are an effect of the Sun's magnetic poles shifting, and the period of such shifts is ... 11 years.
Another peculiar detail shown by Dr. Kaku:
engineers of levies in New Orleans knew that a hurricane of Katrina magnitude was a true possibility and structures were not ready. They said "But it won't happen in my life."
@Austyg You're missing details. The EARTH goes through magnetic pole reversal on a timescale in the thousands of years. The SUN goes through it on the timescale of 11 years. There is no discrepancy here. Even if earth's poles flipped every 11 years, wouldn't that demonstrate to you that it's a relatively harmless effect? I don't remember any horrifying disasters 11 years ago.
@ThreeFangCat , Your other link, which shares a view with Dr. Kaku:
"The [Nat Acad of Sci] framed the problem two years ago ... It noted how people of the 21st-century rely on high-tech systems for the basics of daily life. Smart power grids, GPS navigation, air travel, financial services and emergency radio communications can all be knocked out by intense solar activity."
@Austyg You're entirely missing the point. It's not that there is no potential for problems. It is that there is nothing particularly relevant to 2012 doomsaying, which is rooted in fiction. If you're truly concerned about the realities of solar storms, posting to a video about the fiction of claims made by doomsayers isn't the best place go get that across.
@ThreeFangCat , The thinking in this video goes thus:
"Many claims of disasters for 2012 are baseless; solar cycle maximum could cause disasters in 2012, therefore it is a baseless claim."
Well the warnings about 2012 solar storm disasters have been issued by NOAA, supported by NASA, and by the National Academy of Sciences, and based on sound science. So, yeah no, this video's error warrants pointing it out.
@Austyg That's a straw man argument. You made 'the thinking' and argued against this fantasy version. It's utterly invalid. What he DOES do is explain the solar cycle in basic terms and conclude: "There's no reason to suspect that this 2012 time period will be any different from the others." And you've shown me NOTHING that goes against that statement.
@3FC-- SOMETHING, from science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2010/04jun_swef/
"Earth and space are about to come into contact in a way that's new to human history ... Richard Fisher, head of NASA's Heliophysics Division, explains ... :
'The sun is waking up from a deep slumber, and in the next few years we expect to see much higher levels of solar activity. At the same time, our technological society has developed an unprecedented sensitivity to solar storms.' "
@Austyg No, it's no different. It is simply two things:
(1) Noting the solar max is starting
(2) Noting we rely on devices
Keep grasping at straws, but this is not in any way, shape, or form a validation that the solar max itself is predicted to be special in any way. The point here is that the solar predictions do NOT validate the 2012ers claims. What part of that do you fail to understand? This video is about 2012 doom claims!
@Austyg First, every 11 years, humanity has even more electronic devices than before. That means that 11 years ago, we had UNPRECEDENTED sensitive to solar storms. And 11 years ago, we will, AGAIN, have the same situation.
Second, you are using the quote about level of solar activity COMPLETELY OUT OF CONTEXT. It is in comparison to the solar minimum. If your goal is to discredit yourself, quoting out of context and linking to 2012 bunk are two good ways of doing that.
1) Everything I have quoted is 100% within its own context.
2) What you call "linking to 2012 bunk" is YOUR LINKS. You said to get them at YOUR channel---which I did. YOUR BUNK then? Well, your blinding rage makes you so blind that you fail to realize those links are the NASA website news.
Oh, wait, nothing escapes your vilification if it disagrees with your opinions---not even NASA, eh?
You fail to grasp what those NASA articles say and what they mean.
@Austyg We have been over this already. This video is ABOUT 2012 doomsayer claims. You're continuing to flagrantly ignore context.
And neither Kaku nor Yeomans have linked solar storms to the 2012 doomsayer claims. They have merely recognized when the next solar maxima is. There is a substantial difference there.
And we also know Kaku's statement were based on the early space weather forecast, since toned down. Please also note he's not an astronomer, he's a theoretical physicist.
@ThreeFangCat * You have come full circle ... to repeat what you already said. You seem to be stuck on something.
I pointed out the relevant statements of qualified sources---they speak by themselves. I'm glad to have been of help to anyone wanting to avail themselves of the information I relayed.
@Austyg I said the same thing over because you made the same flawed statements. A non-astronomer speaking about an outdated space weather report is not a 'qualified source'. Taking quotes out of context is not relaying information. I understand having concern over space weather, but Dr Yeoman's point that there is no special concern merely because Dec 21, 2012 is coming is correct.
@ThreeFangCat , The warnings issued by NOAA are not about Earth's magnetic poles shifting. The warnings are about solar activity cycle maximum around 2012/2013 causing damages in ubiquitous electrical/electronic devices mounting to trillions of dollars, and severely disrupting lives of large populations, not unlike hurricane Katrina scale of disasters.
Also, Dr. Michio Kaku, Physicist, points out that the electric power grid of cities and/or entire continents could be wiped out by the Sun's electromagnetic "tsunami" of 2012, causing trillions of dollars in losses---Katrina hurricane impact was $150 billion. Such power outages will lead to food riots and pillaging.
Observe this logic: if the Solar tsunami disasters do not happen, you can still use and consume your survival provisions--nothing lost.
@Austyg It's worth noting Dr Kaku is a theoretical physicist. He's one of the co-authors of string theory. On solar weather, he's working outside his field. The comments he made were in response to early predictions of the solar maxima for 2012-2013. Those predictions were toned down after the long and quiet solar minimum (see my channel comments, 9 months back.)
@ThreeFangCat , NASA site you suggest corrects its own previous forecast:
"It is tempting to describe such a cycle as 'weak' or 'mild,' but that could give the wrong impression. 'Even a below-average cycle is capable of producing severe space weather,' points out Biesecker. 'The great geomagnetic storm of 1859, for instance, occurred during a solar cycle of about the same size we’re predicting for 2013.'"
@Austyg The solar maxima, ANY solar maxima, has the potential to create problems. However, saying something 'is capable of producing...' is not the same as predicting 'will produce...' What we do know is a stronger solar max means higher chances of problems. So doomsayer carping about the next solar max is particularly silly.
However, this isn't to say any potential for problems should be dismissed. I don't advocate that. Just that there is no special significance about 2012 claims.
"It [Sun] reaches a solar maximum every eleven years or so for millenia, and there's no reason to suspect that this 2012 time period will be any different from the others."
Oh, it is very different today. As Michio Kaku points out in another vid.: in 1990 we (USA?) had only 11 satellites in orbit---today we have many more for telecomms, GPS, defense, etc.
We have serious e-magnetic vulnerabilities now, which non-postmodern humans never had.
@ManosOceano I'm not sure what you mean by that. You asked a relatively ignorant question 6 days ago, were given answers, and never so much as acknowledged the attempt at conversation.
Immediately discredit themselves as soon as they use the words "reality check" and wacky. Now i'm not saying i'm 100% sold on the 2012 theories but by deeming so called conspiracy theorists 'wacky' they are using the same term by which many organisations use to discredit anyone that questions authority, in which many of these "wacky" theorists have been proved right in the past. It is almost certainly a method used by the CIA for sure-fact.
@dubsteparep They use "wacky" because all the theories about 2012 are completely baseless, and you'd have have done little to no actual research in order to believe them. Tell me, what "wacky" theorists have been right in the past about an event similar to 2012?
@dubsteparep Some of the 2012 claims have such a complete disconnect from reality 'wacky' is the only way to describe it. The primary judge, of course, is evidence. The 2012ers use a total lack of evidence or deceptive incorrect evidence to bolster their claims. (Depends on the 2012er.)
I'd be more concerned how you claim they 'immediately discredit' from very minor issues. You're a more extreme example of exactly what you complain about.
if its the end of the world in 2012, why would there be a need for survival stuff, especially when what they are describing is so in over our heads physically that we would all be dead. folks, its a scam.
I don't think disasters or anything will happen on the death date the Mayans gave us. I think it'll be a man engineered catastrophe if anything... My wildest imaginations hopes alien contact though if I'm honest...
@ThreeFangCat look there is no question our government and NASA lies, or covers up the truth. i dnt have to show proof you can find proof all over the web. and it is fact that NASA has blacked out large portions of photos humble has sent back to earth, and a large amount of photos from the mars rover that has not been released to the public. now just ask yourself, why wouldnt they want those pictures to go public??... try googling this and you will see what i mean when i say LIES
@OneMoreThingToDoo No. You are accusing them of not just having lied in the past, but 'continuing to lie', which rather implies in this context. So you get to prove they are lying about a 2012 subject. And you don't get to tell me to do your research, you're the one doing accusing here.
people the calander ends and restarts why do people have to say it ends so does that mean every year for us the world could end because the calander re starts also the alder mayans say that it wonte end so dont belive its gana end yeh were gana face bad problems in 2012 like we do every year but really just enjoy life fuck its simple
@ManosOceano Obviously, a supermassive black hole plays a vital role as the gravitational center of the galaxy. Do you have some reason to think it's being ignored in a 2012 context--that it is suddenly more menacing than it has been for any of the previous 4.5 billion years? Feel free to make a specific claim and back it with evidence.
@ManosOceano Supermassive black holes ( one of which lies at the center of our Milky Way galaxy ) are LAZY black holes ( in simplest terms ). As ThreeFangCat made point of ... What exactly makes you think the black hole which lies in the middle of our galaxy is now, all of a sudden ( after 4.5 billion years ), something to be of great concern about ?
@ultimatecomic69 Sadly, as I have stated here on YouTube repeatedly, believe it is some type of a "Give me something to believe in " syndrome. Some people, in their life, feel some type of void and decide to fill it with bullshit whether it carries merit or not. What can a person do, really ? Just try to inform now and again and let nature take its course I guess.
@STHFGDBY I can't wait either, want to know why? Because the babbling idiots will be under the rocks where I can't hear them yap about this dumb shit any longer :D
you know most people believe that the egyptians used jews as slaves to build pyramids, without proof..
at least nebiru WAS ON A SUMARIAN DRAWING THING IT WAS SO AWESOME! i bet we already found the planet. i mean they. (the scientists what only show the planet as a little ball because "their telescopes isnt good enough to show us a close up" WHEN THE GO BEYOND THAT PLANET WAAAY FURTHER TO SHOW US ANOTHER PLANET.. AS A LITTLE BALL! OR JUST DRAWING A FAKE PLANET AND TELLING US ITS REAL!
im not worried about planets hitting us in 2012 im worried about the goverments killing people off and blaming niburu or whatever they can come up with remember the last time 911 ...do you think nasa idiots now the truth they dont they are on the kill off list to ! oh and by the way we pilots have a old joke about spam in a can ,,,and anything nasa puts in space is space junk befor it leaves the pad not after lol i have TURDS with more computing power the the SHUTTLE SMART PHONE STUPID SHUTTLE
@g6rcteam If you're worried about governments trying to blame dastardly actions on 'Nibiru', the best way to prevent this kind of thing is to establish a greater level of expectation of evidence when claims are presented.
For example, what evidence do you have about who's on the 'kill off list'? You act as if you know, but you give no evidence for this.
Soviet Union-1950s Loss in money--- HAVENT RECOVERED
England 1500s through 2011- Relied on countries and got Shited on--- THEY KEEP RECOVERING.
Also did you know religions, christians specifically have predicted the world would end 7 times l(LAST ONE MAY 25) and all have failed The 21st will be the 8th to fail.
Well Timmy, a scientist has calmly and logically explained to you why it's going to be ok in 2012, what are you going to do? Timmy: I'm going to believe in it even more, and disregard even further anything anyone tells me which is contrary to what I previously believed. - Now that's not very scientific Timmy. Timmy: Scientists don't know as much as I do about 2012.
o boy! This guy just proved that there's something fishy about 2012 cause think about it hes tryna calm people down n let the truth not b spread out If nothing was gonna happen in 2012 why the hell would NASA even care about the bullshit internet always makes up, but they did 4 2012 cause they know whats up with them n area 51 n aliens :D now if u will excuse me i have to play pokemon HG
o boy! This guy just proved that there's something fishy about 2012 cause think about it hes tryna calm people down n let the truth not b spread out If nothing was gonna happen in 2012 why the hell would NASA even care about the bullshit internet always makes up, but they did 4 2012 cause they know whats up with them n area 51 n aliens :D now if u will excuse me i have to play pokemon HG
@Mr007eds Your logic is tremendously flawed. NASA has long run a question and answer service called 'Ask an Astrobiologist'. In it, people have sent in a lot of Emails with concern over 2012. NASA's concern over the issue is a simple extension of that.
As for your assumptions regarding area 51 and aliens, that has nothing to do with it. I will note, however, you are assuming yourself to be correct on those issues.
1. He is not expecting anything around 2012 ? What about the State of the World right now? is it really ok? This guy was put here on Purpose !! There is no planet "NIBURU" ? or NIBIRU you mean? funny NASA is admit about the existence of this planet years ago.. No Telescopic evidence ? are you for real? Extraordinary Claims requires extraordinary MONEY he means.. before the evidence
@sniritzo .. there is no evidence ( Repeat it Again ) for dummies or mentally disabled people.. The Mayan calendar dies not end in 2012 ? Says a guy that works In Jet Propulsion Lab NEOP .. that has nothing to do with history or he does? he continues his show regarding the Mayans as an expert ofc .. Bla Bla BLa .. Pathetic statements regarding the Mayan calendar in comparison with our own . LOL Can't be compared at all.. Google regarding the Mayans calendar any source on the NET and i mean any
@sniritzo To see that this guy is full of shit.. Aha about the sun activity.. so it is expected around 2012 after all ? and we have nothing to fear ? really ?
so i guess the 350% increase in satellites launches in orbit of the earth is just for fun and upgrades of the communication systems in this time of great economical crisis.. i guess USA doing well after 9/11 deposit .. no problems spend a few billions ..
@sniritzo HAHA There is a historic time of pole reversal ( followed by a professional visual effect with the hands ) 400.000 year scale ?? OMG this guy did not do his homework really... Google that also.. and again !!! The KEYWORDS - AND THERE IS NO EVIDENCE WHATSOEVER !!! ( Parrot ) that would not effect ? ( followed even if it did ) bla bla bla... There won't be any planetary alignments ? ...... but and even if there were it wouldn't be an effect only the sun and moon effect earth movement?
@sniritzo i am telling you this statement is for mentally dead people i guess .. so be very carefull where you get the information on the web ONLY BELIEVE NASA VERIFIED INFORMATION CAUSE NASA ALWAYS SPEAKS THE TRUTH THE ALL TRUTH AND NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH SO HELP HER GOD !!!
@sniritzo 400,000 years is an approximation. Some magnetosphere pole reversals occur over a period of less years ( 200,000 ? ) and some occur over a period of more years. Actually, the last magnetosphere pole reversal occurred over 800,000+ years ago and scientists say we are long overdue for another.
@ReneeNme approximation? is like me saying this to you you will die in approximately 1000 years! you believe me ? no? but why? it is only a approximation. There are some facts that reversals occurs every 4k-8k years also you know!! either way none is laying any kind of evidence cause they simply can't... or won't? Don't misunderstand me i am not up for conspiracy theory it is only common logic..
@sniritzo The term 'pole reversal' is rather vague. Earth has geomagnetic reversals which take place once every few hundred thousand years, on average. OTOH, the doomsayers also speak of changes in the axial pole of rotation or even a full crustal shift. Until evidence comes forward for such events, they can be regarded as rubbish.
Further, this history of mass extinctions and geomagnetic reversals are both known. Yet, nobody has shown a coincidence between the two.
@ThreeFangCat Just ask yourself if any of us can give any evidence regarding events of that scale.. it is nearly impossible you need an enormous financial bases to even get a hints of those evidence well they know that... also regarding " Earth geomagnetic reversals which take place once every few hundred thousand years " this is a non evidence statement cause there is " NO EVIDENCE " regarding this timetable.. the only evidence that is backed up is that the event happens.
@sniritzo So that is what it comes down to: when asked for evidence you say you are incapable of producing it. However, I see you're not shy about unfounded claims.
As for what evidence is available to the average person, consulting the scientific literature is acceptable. That would be an example of bringing evidence.
@ThreeFangCat well first of all i did not claim anything... besides the fact that this scientist is a puppet and out of his field regarding this matter... he shout over and over again the same phrase about evidences that's why i also use this.. and furthermore for me NASA facts or evidences is " NOT " scientific literature .. cause NASA is operates under the command of the USA government Secret Services. At 9/11 USA image commit suicide under the same orders of the same services..
@sniritzo You've make quite a few claims and continue to do so. Here is one from your very first post:
"NASA is admit about the existence of this planet years ago"
So let's not go into this delusion you haven't made claims. Then you continue with yet more, most amusingly that NASA operates under the Secret Services. All the while I show you the evidence and you summarily ignore it.
As for your questions, unless you have a claim backed by evidence, they just don't matter. And you don't.
@sniritzo For example, let's take a look at the wiki entry on Geomagnetic Reversal. If you scroll to the bottom, you'll see 48 footnote reference citing the evidence the article draws upon to make the statements it does. Sources include journals like Earth Pand Planetary Science Letters, Nature, Journal of Geophysical Research, etc. All of them peer-reviewed and quite respected.
@sniritzo NASA has NEVER admitted to the existence of a " Nibiru " other than NASA's senior scientist David Morrison commenting that the name " Nibiru " is associated with the babylonian / sumerian god Marduk and that according to their astrology belief system the planet Jupiter ( Nibiru ) was representative of the god Marduk. And in this, Mr. Morrison is absolutely correct.
@sniritzo The state of the world right now has nothing to do with astronomical issues. Whether is terrible or wonderful, the likelyhood of an astronomical disaster is determined from the physical evidence.
You seem to claim there is, in fact, evidence for 2012 claims. OK, well that sentiment will mean something if you can actually make a tangible claim and back it with this supposed evidence. Vague statements and calls for the listener to back your claims don't count.
@ThreeFangCat Has nothing to do?? you have evidence to back up this statement ? If any astronomical event of that scale was to happen trust me the economy state going to be the first symptoms .. To know the future either is 1 day ahead or 10 years give you a huge advantage as long as you keep your mouth shut..
@sniritzo As you were the one that equated world events to astronomical events, the evidence is yours to produce. It is not my burden simply because I disagree. And while I agree with the notion a definitive astronomical event could effect the world economy, I do not agree with your implication that bad things will happen in astronomical terms in 2012 just because things aren't so peach on Earth.
@ThreeFangCat Have you wondered though why the world economy suddenly is shattered to pieces? Have you Really? Have you build any scenarios? Have you asked yourself why the earth biggest nations have this kind of behavior this suddenly ? New World Order ? Astronomical Event ? Doomsday ? I don't know i just know that all this is not random events ... I use logic nothing more..
I'm glad that NASA is one of the few American groups that actually knows how to think and evaluate before they go shouting out so called "news" all over the internet, it's terrifying how idiotic humans can be sometimes
If you want to know about the end of the world. the sunrise in the west
signs of the end of the world. Dajjal will come out of the earth's surface. many an earthquake, hurricanes, tsunamis and volcanoes will occur. all creatures will die on that day and no one will live for the day. (Antichrist is a big giant creatures)
WE WILL ALL DIE IN APPROXIMATELY 6 hours and 42 minutes. The Mayans changed the date, didn't you see the memo? Lol too many different things going on in terms of these theories. One can hope though right?
@lyndapies On October is the end of a cycle and then the last cycle begins till 21-12-2012 That the final Cycle is come to an end ! ( Always according the Mayans )
omg, i said i will post the name tomoz when i dig out the documentary, you said the galactic alignment happens every year not that it occurs at the same time as the winter solstice, that is getting them mixed up. i will reply tomoz
Anyway, information on solar max are located on my channel comments, two posts one 7 and the other 8 months ago. This is why, depending on what you get quotes, you may get a different take on it. The prediction changed.
The galactic alignment and winter solstice are both yearly events, occurring at about the same time, albeit for different reasons.
If you read my channel comments, you'll find I'm a stickler for sources. Why? Because it matters.
You still watched it on you tube and i did know that that was your dr, how do you know the one i watched was vague as you didn't watch it, i will reply with the docs name for you tomoz, I was following your logic though and believing exactly what the nasa scientist said, my problem was that i have seen two different scientists saying two different things both from nasa. If you got the the winter solstice and the galactic alignment mixed tbh your not really worth having a debate with
@MegaPete2011 The point here is that you cannot cite some 'nasa SCIENTIST' from some TV show you saw and act as if that is meaningful. It isn't. You keep saying you see two scientists from NASA saying different things, WHICH TWO? It's really simple, answer the question.
@MegaPete2011 Galactic Alignment : This is a term that many 2012 authors throw about. They LOVE to take a stirring stick and mix the term " Galactic Alignment " to include Axial Precession, Earth crossing the Galactic Plane, and the Winter Solstice which tends to confuse many people. This is what they do, this is how they sell books, they deceive. Truth of the matter being is that there is no alignment that we should be concerned about come December of 2012. NONE !!!
@MegaPete2011 The guy in this video IS Dr Yeomans. What you're comparing him to is some vague 'nasa SCIENTIST' you saw on TV, but cannot quote or name.
Well the mayans speak bull because they didn't predict that we would universary reset our calender after the birth of Jesus (if it happened) but still we changed the years, so in the sense of the mayan calendar it has been and gone, but obvs was not here as I am currently typing this bullshit which I dont know why, Fuck me Im bored, Im off to play some Xbox
whew so relived
NickGster1 2 days ago
First, freedom; second, the black hole.
ManosOceano 3 days ago
The USA is being walked into civil war. The NDAA must burn! Be ready for the call. ENGAGE the GRASS ROOTS!
ManosOceano 3 days ago
only 258 people are dying on 2012--december
RampageJackson16 4 days ago
2,798 people are unable to use their brains...
dragonmastershow 6 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This guy dont know what he s talking about, the truth is we are raping planet earth and disturbing it natural law by heat which create global warming. Car and air plane and other great force increase turbulence which create tornado. Up to now scientist have unsolved problem of classical physics but it is all there and even if they did understand it they wouldn't do anything about it. The funny part is they don't even know the cause of tornado!!
dragonmastershow 6 days ago
Comment removed
dragonmastershow 6 days ago
The end of the world COULD happen this year 2012 if Iran and EU/Israel get into a war. And there is also a real asteroid (not Nibiru) coming closer to Earth in the next decades. Its has been named Apofhis. And... of course NASA wouldnt say anything IF the world where really in danger. Rationality will always be a self-tranqualizer perspective, an illusion of control and predictiveness covers our most basic fears. Science, just as religions discurse give us sense/meaning to face underlyn Caos.
aportela1980 1 week ago
@aportela1980
A war has nothing to do with the 2012 claims, even if it were to coincidentally happen in 2012.
As for Apophis, it was brought to our attention by NASA. So you can claim what NASA would or would not do all you want, you have no evidence for such a claim and the Apophis example serves as refuting evidence.
ThreeFangCat 6 days ago
@ThreeFangCat I believe his claim was based upon rational thinking. If NASA was aware the world was in danger i am certain they would not want to create a widespread panic. There is no way everybody in the world could get enough supplies in order to survive if disaster was to strike. The population is too high, and the amount of resources, although sufficient for the currant way of life, would not be enough to sustain everyone in an end of the world scenario.
mischief658 5 days ago
@mischief658 There are two aspects to this.
1) I was pointing out that regardless of the validity of his supposedly logical construct, history proves him wrong. Information on one of the dangers he lists is fully available from NASA.
2) The 'they wouldn't tell us' story is irrelevant becuase it tells us nothing. Doomsayers neglect to observe that if NASA would logically say the same thing if 2012 claims were false. No conclusion can thus be reached even IF the 'logic' were actually valid.
ThreeFangCat 4 days ago
@ThreeFangCat I dont think anybodys saying theres absolute proof the world is going to end in 2012... Just toying with the idea. Maybe I should just use bigger words like you to make me seem like i know what im talking about..
mischief658 4 days ago
@mischief658 The most common 2012 claim is for massive death and destruction. Some say they are absolutely right (Patrick Geryl), which others claim the chance is so high that you would be a fool not to 'prepare'. That's not just toying, that is making claims.
And you skipped the point. Whether the 2012 claims are worth acting on is based on the evidence that backs the claims. Evidence, the 'E' word, is the bane of doomsayers everywhere.
ThreeFangCat 4 days ago
@mischief658 This said, the issue of NASA is a sideshow to a much more important issue. Whether 2012 claims are valid is fully dependent on the quality of the supporting evidence. THAT is the real issue, and one that, time and time again, doomsayers have a lot less to say about than weaving conspiracy-laden stories.
ThreeFangCat 4 days ago
@aportela1980 Nice one dummy,Apophis is going to pass by Earth in the year 2029 and return on 2036.And wars are possible but cannot destroy a whole world,the previous World Wars proved that and you betrayed your own self back there by just showing it won't even be a World War.And do you really believe NASA can put a big arse black disk in front of an object and no one notices?One more thing,Religion explains the world around us and Science does it better but makes it look 'unethical'.
M2orNot 2 days ago
@M2orNot And I see no reason to face a chaos that won't happen,or at least that there is no proof that will happen.
M2orNot 2 days ago
the only reason why people are claiming 2012 is the end of the world is simply to make money through false prophecies. Advertising and media attention is what these people want. Everyone knows that it wont be the end of the world. We should stop giving these people the time of day.
tskuhac 1 week ago
257 people are unable to use their brains...
NovaChew 1 week ago in playlist SpaceRip Top Videos 7
NASA= Never A Straight Answer;
why should I believe a bunch of liers sons of bitches?
GO FUCK YOURSELF NASA!
gabigowriel 1 week ago
@gabigowriel It's not a matter of believing NASA. It's a matter of believing those who make doomsayer claims, but don't bring evidence. If you say NASA lies, can you prove they lie about anything related to the subject material here? Or are you just here to shout accusations and made-up acronyms?
ThreeFangCat 1 week ago
@ThreeFangCat For me NASA doesn't even exists!
That's how much I care about their LIES and your comment!
Good day!
gabigowriel 1 week ago
@gabigowriel It's clearly apparent form your response that you can't back your accusations. Typical.
ThreeFangCat 1 week ago
@ThreeFangCat I don't have to; facts are obvious!
And after all , everybody is free to believe whatever wants!
NASA= liers for me , and it's like non-existing!
I won't answer you from now on so: HAVE A GOOD DAY!
gabigowriel 1 week ago
@gabigowriel No. Just saying you have facts that back your accusations is not like actually showing it is true. You're just typical of the type, acting like you don't need to back your claims. If you don't want to respond, fine. I'll just note you have failed to back your claims, and they are now utterly invalid.
ThreeFangCat 1 week ago
fucking fuck fucking eggnog!!!!!!!
adamsutherland123 1 week ago
Comment removed
adamsutherland123 1 week ago
Actually it has been a habit of all those morons to end the world every few years lately. I am sure they will find a world in the Bible to sum it up to a nice date as they usually do.
spacesightseer 1 week ago
Next 'The end of the world' comes in 2525.....prepare your evidence.......
Ellemphriem 1 week ago
YAY!!!! BITCH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
adamsutherland123 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
When I was 6 I saw a calendar and saw that the month ended and I was worried that existence was going to end! But then I came to the realization that it was just a calendar. I guess some people just don't learn anything from kindergarten...
kentonagbone 1 week ago
A curious detail:
Dr. Donald Yeomans says here that the Earth's magnetic poles shift over periods of thousands of years.
Dr. Michio Kaku mentions that the Solar emag. "tsunamis" are an effect of the Sun's magnetic poles shifting, and the period of such shifts is ... 11 years.
Another peculiar detail shown by Dr. Kaku:
engineers of levies in New Orleans knew that a hurricane of Katrina magnitude was a true possibility and structures were not ready. They said "But it won't happen in my life."
Austyg 2 weeks ago
@Austyg You're missing details. The EARTH goes through magnetic pole reversal on a timescale in the thousands of years. The SUN goes through it on the timescale of 11 years. There is no discrepancy here. Even if earth's poles flipped every 11 years, wouldn't that demonstrate to you that it's a relatively harmless effect? I don't remember any horrifying disasters 11 years ago.
ThreeFangCat 2 weeks ago
@ThreeFangCat , Your other link, which shares a view with Dr. Kaku:
"The [Nat Acad of Sci] framed the problem two years ago ... It noted how people of the 21st-century rely on high-tech systems for the basics of daily life. Smart power grids, GPS navigation, air travel, financial services and emergency radio communications can all be knocked out by intense solar activity."
science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2010/04jun_swef/
In 1990 we only had 11 satellites in orbit.
Austyg 2 weeks ago
@Austyg You're entirely missing the point. It's not that there is no potential for problems. It is that there is nothing particularly relevant to 2012 doomsaying, which is rooted in fiction. If you're truly concerned about the realities of solar storms, posting to a video about the fiction of claims made by doomsayers isn't the best place go get that across.
ThreeFangCat 2 weeks ago
@ThreeFangCat " ... isn't the best place go get that across ". Valid point.
ReneeNme 2 weeks ago
@ThreeFangCat , The thinking in this video goes thus:
"Many claims of disasters for 2012 are baseless; solar cycle maximum could cause disasters in 2012, therefore it is a baseless claim."
Well the warnings about 2012 solar storm disasters have been issued by NOAA, supported by NASA, and by the National Academy of Sciences, and based on sound science. So, yeah no, this video's error warrants pointing it out.
science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2010/04jun_swef/
Austyg 2 weeks ago
@Austyg That's a straw man argument. You made 'the thinking' and argued against this fantasy version. It's utterly invalid. What he DOES do is explain the solar cycle in basic terms and conclude: "There's no reason to suspect that this 2012 time period will be any different from the others." And you've shown me NOTHING that goes against that statement.
ThreeFangCat 2 weeks ago
@3FC-- SOMETHING, from science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2010/04jun_swef/
"Earth and space are about to come into contact in a way that's new to human history ... Richard Fisher, head of NASA's Heliophysics Division, explains ... :
'The sun is waking up from a deep slumber, and in the next few years we expect to see much higher levels of solar activity. At the same time, our technological society has developed an unprecedented sensitivity to solar storms.' "
VRY DFFRNT
Austyg 2 weeks ago
@Austyg No, it's no different. It is simply two things:
(1) Noting the solar max is starting
(2) Noting we rely on devices
Keep grasping at straws, but this is not in any way, shape, or form a validation that the solar max itself is predicted to be special in any way. The point here is that the solar predictions do NOT validate the 2012ers claims. What part of that do you fail to understand? This video is about 2012 doom claims!
ThreeFangCat 2 weeks ago
Comment removed
Austyg 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@3fc - Seems you missed them; let me emphasize the key words of NASA article "science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2010/04jun_swef/":
"...NEW to human history"
"...MUCH HIGHER levels of solar activity"
"...UNPRECEDENTED sensitivity to solar storms"
Contrast with Dr. Yeomans' tone:
"There's NO REASON to suspect that this 2012 time period will be ANY DIFFERENT from the others."
The 2012 condition IS VERY DIFFERENT--as shown by Kaku, Fisher, NOAA, NASA, Nat Acad Sci.
Austyg 2 weeks ago
@Austyg First, every 11 years, humanity has even more electronic devices than before. That means that 11 years ago, we had UNPRECEDENTED sensitive to solar storms. And 11 years ago, we will, AGAIN, have the same situation.
Second, you are using the quote about level of solar activity COMPLETELY OUT OF CONTEXT. It is in comparison to the solar minimum. If your goal is to discredit yourself, quoting out of context and linking to 2012 bunk are two good ways of doing that.
ThreeFangCat 2 weeks ago
@ThreeFangCat ::
1) Everything I have quoted is 100% within its own context.
2) What you call "linking to 2012 bunk" is YOUR LINKS. You said to get them at YOUR channel---which I did. YOUR BUNK then? Well, your blinding rage makes you so blind that you fail to realize those links are the NASA website news.
Oh, wait, nothing escapes your vilification if it disagrees with your opinions---not even NASA, eh?
You fail to grasp what those NASA articles say and what they mean.
Austyg 2 weeks ago
@Austyg
(1) No, you clearly were misrepresenting the strength of the solar max as unusual, when it was merely saying we were coming out of the solar minimum.
(2) I wasn't meaning 'web link', I was speaking about your campaign to link legitimate solar storm concerns to 2012.
(3) You have no evidence that I have 'blinding rage', yet you flippantly claim it anyway. This tells me how much you value evidence.
(4) Did you even get the point I made about how we have more electronics every 11 years?
ThreeFangCat 2 weeks ago
@ThreeFangCat \\ Incidentally, in YOUR links, which part of "SCIENCE.NASA.GOV" is it you label "BUNK"?
By the way, the only 2 links I have listed here as corroborating text are in science.nasa.gov.
Austyg 2 weeks ago
@Austyg The answer is 'see point 2, below'.
ThreeFangCat 2 weeks ago
@ThreeFangCat #
I have not linked solar storms with 2012---both Dr. Kaku, and Dr. Yeomans linked the coming solar cycle peak with 2012.
I merely pointed out how different the perspectives of the two good doctors is: one of them warning of dangers, the other one commending eggnog.
Austyg 1 week ago
@Austyg We have been over this already. This video is ABOUT 2012 doomsayer claims. You're continuing to flagrantly ignore context.
And neither Kaku nor Yeomans have linked solar storms to the 2012 doomsayer claims. They have merely recognized when the next solar maxima is. There is a substantial difference there.
And we also know Kaku's statement were based on the early space weather forecast, since toned down. Please also note he's not an astronomer, he's a theoretical physicist.
ThreeFangCat 1 week ago
@ThreeFangCat * You have come full circle ... to repeat what you already said. You seem to be stuck on something.
I pointed out the relevant statements of qualified sources---they speak by themselves. I'm glad to have been of help to anyone wanting to avail themselves of the information I relayed.
Austyg 1 week ago
@Austyg I said the same thing over because you made the same flawed statements. A non-astronomer speaking about an outdated space weather report is not a 'qualified source'. Taking quotes out of context is not relaying information. I understand having concern over space weather, but Dr Yeoman's point that there is no special concern merely because Dec 21, 2012 is coming is correct.
ThreeFangCat 1 week ago
@ThreeFangCat , The warnings issued by NOAA are not about Earth's magnetic poles shifting. The warnings are about solar activity cycle maximum around 2012/2013 causing damages in ubiquitous electrical/electronic devices mounting to trillions of dollars, and severely disrupting lives of large populations, not unlike hurricane Katrina scale of disasters.
Read it in the NASA website:
science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2010/04jun_swef/
Austyg 2 weeks ago
Also, Dr. Michio Kaku, Physicist, points out that the electric power grid of cities and/or entire continents could be wiped out by the Sun's electromagnetic "tsunami" of 2012, causing trillions of dollars in losses---Katrina hurricane impact was $150 billion. Such power outages will lead to food riots and pillaging.
Observe this logic: if the Solar tsunami disasters do not happen, you can still use and consume your survival provisions--nothing lost.
Is it prudent to derisively get eggnog? No.
Austyg 2 weeks ago
@Austyg It's worth noting Dr Kaku is a theoretical physicist. He's one of the co-authors of string theory. On solar weather, he's working outside his field. The comments he made were in response to early predictions of the solar maxima for 2012-2013. Those predictions were toned down after the long and quiet solar minimum (see my channel comments, 9 months back.)
ThreeFangCat 2 weeks ago
@ThreeFangCat , NASA site you suggest corrects its own previous forecast:
"It is tempting to describe such a cycle as 'weak' or 'mild,' but that could give the wrong impression. 'Even a below-average cycle is capable of producing severe space weather,' points out Biesecker. 'The great geomagnetic storm of 1859, for instance, occurred during a solar cycle of about the same size we’re predicting for 2013.'"
science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2009/29may_noaaprediction/
Austyg 2 weeks ago
@Austyg The solar maxima, ANY solar maxima, has the potential to create problems. However, saying something 'is capable of producing...' is not the same as predicting 'will produce...' What we do know is a stronger solar max means higher chances of problems. So doomsayer carping about the next solar max is particularly silly.
However, this isn't to say any potential for problems should be dismissed. I don't advocate that. Just that there is no special significance about 2012 claims.
ThreeFangCat 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Alarm bells ring loud when Dr. Yeomans says:
"It [Sun] reaches a solar maximum every eleven years or so for millenia, and there's no reason to suspect that this 2012 time period will be any different from the others."
Oh, it is very different today. As Michio Kaku points out in another vid.: in 1990 we (USA?) had only 11 satellites in orbit---today we have many more for telecomms, GPS, defense, etc.
We have serious e-magnetic vulnerabilities now, which non-postmodern humans never had.
Austyg 2 weeks ago
Comment removed
Austyg 2 weeks ago
great answers require great dialogue.
ManosOceano 2 weeks ago
@ManosOceano I'm not sure what you mean by that. You asked a relatively ignorant question 6 days ago, were given answers, and never so much as acknowledged the attempt at conversation.
ThreeFangCat 2 weeks ago
Immediately discredit themselves as soon as they use the words "reality check" and wacky. Now i'm not saying i'm 100% sold on the 2012 theories but by deeming so called conspiracy theorists 'wacky' they are using the same term by which many organisations use to discredit anyone that questions authority, in which many of these "wacky" theorists have been proved right in the past. It is almost certainly a method used by the CIA for sure-fact.
dubsteparep 2 weeks ago
@dubsteparep They use "wacky" because all the theories about 2012 are completely baseless, and you'd have have done little to no actual research in order to believe them. Tell me, what "wacky" theorists have been right in the past about an event similar to 2012?
thesmashfloydian 2 weeks ago
@dubsteparep Some of the 2012 claims have such a complete disconnect from reality 'wacky' is the only way to describe it. The primary judge, of course, is evidence. The 2012ers use a total lack of evidence or deceptive incorrect evidence to bolster their claims. (Depends on the 2012er.)
I'd be more concerned how you claim they 'immediately discredit' from very minor issues. You're a more extreme example of exactly what you complain about.
ThreeFangCat 2 weeks ago
i don’t mind what happens in 2010, as long as my coffee machine runs it'll be okee
fluibertje 2 weeks ago
if its the end of the world in 2012, why would there be a need for survival stuff, especially when what they are describing is so in over our heads physically that we would all be dead. folks, its a scam.
ClassyMarching14 2 weeks ago
Mayans run of stone:/
Dankooo1964 2 weeks ago
I don't think disasters or anything will happen on the death date the Mayans gave us. I think it'll be a man engineered catastrophe if anything... My wildest imaginations hopes alien contact though if I'm honest...
MarquisGemini 2 weeks ago
2012 is nothing but a conspiracy
cctitansfan 2 weeks ago
Jesus said that no one knows the day when the end of world will end. Maybe right or tomorrow. Only God knows.
rawyld 2 weeks ago
@rawyld there is no god. The bible is retarded. Go and learn some Science.
DerrenBrown100 2 weeks ago
@ThreeFangCat look there is no question our government and NASA lies, or covers up the truth. i dnt have to show proof you can find proof all over the web. and it is fact that NASA has blacked out large portions of photos humble has sent back to earth, and a large amount of photos from the mars rover that has not been released to the public. now just ask yourself, why wouldnt they want those pictures to go public??... try googling this and you will see what i mean when i say LIES
OneMoreThingToDoo 3 weeks ago
@OneMoreThingToDoo No. You are accusing them of not just having lied in the past, but 'continuing to lie', which rather implies in this context. So you get to prove they are lying about a 2012 subject. And you don't get to tell me to do your research, you're the one doing accusing here.
ThreeFangCat 2 weeks ago
لا يعلم هذا العلم الا الله
Ms7heft 3 weeks ago
@Ms7heft الله غير موجود.
EDDlEMEDUZA 3 weeks ago
people the calander ends and restarts why do people have to say it ends so does that mean every year for us the world could end because the calander re starts also the alder mayans say that it wonte end so dont belive its gana end yeh were gana face bad problems in 2012 like we do every year but really just enjoy life fuck its simple
2011GamerBoy 3 weeks ago
If that is the case, Mayan calendar probably ending by 2062 or 2072 instead then we would be probably too old or dead by that time lol!
rpt234 3 weeks ago
too bad my grandma will die without seeing this vid:)
flavius22 3 weeks ago
center of the galaxy's black hole isn't important?
ManosOceano 3 weeks ago
@ManosOceano Obviously, a supermassive black hole plays a vital role as the gravitational center of the galaxy. Do you have some reason to think it's being ignored in a 2012 context--that it is suddenly more menacing than it has been for any of the previous 4.5 billion years? Feel free to make a specific claim and back it with evidence.
ThreeFangCat 3 weeks ago
Comment removed
ReneeNme 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ManosOceano Supermassive black holes ( one of which lies at the center of our Milky Way galaxy ) are LAZY black holes ( in simplest terms ). As ThreeFangCat made point of ... What exactly makes you think the black hole which lies in the middle of our galaxy is now, all of a sudden ( after 4.5 billion years ), something to be of great concern about ?
ReneeNme 3 weeks ago
@ManosOceano Sure it is important but it's been there for 4.3 billion years now.....
peterepicgriffin 2 weeks ago
254 people idiots
Misterfix1000 3 weeks ago
damnit why did i sit up to 3am getting obsessed with this shit!
rmca11 3 weeks ago
those 254 dislikes are the people that are crazy and sitting in a hole waiting until they die but actually can come back out in 2013
MrHockeykid44 3 weeks ago
what about the hole in the magnetic field?
kylewhitney313 3 weeks ago
@kylewhitney313 Holes in the magnetic field are NOT NEW, they happen with some regularity. See my channel comments, 2 months back.
Obviously, we haven't had an apocalypse before, so I don't see why any particular hole is going to do so now.
Beware doomsayers taking regular earth events and portraying them as evidence of impending doom.
ThreeFangCat 3 weeks ago
Lol, who are the 253 people who dislike this video?
JustCallMeBri 3 weeks ago
ex7rodinary claims require ex7rodinary evidence? hi7ler said same 7he 'same' 7hing: if yo wan7 7hem 7o believe a lie, lie big.
samus1421 3 weeks ago
@samus1421 Rule #29 of convincing arguments: the first one to pull out a half-baked comparison to Hitler, loses.
Claims must be backed by evidence. Typing lots of 7's doesn't change that.
ThreeFangCat 3 weeks ago
Obama was pointing a gun at his head...
hookemtv 3 weeks ago
2012 is a money making hoax
ultimatecomic69 3 weeks ago
@ultimatecomic69 Yup.
ReneeNme 3 weeks ago
@ReneeNme thank you i don't know why people believe in this
ultimatecomic69 3 weeks ago
@ultimatecomic69 Sadly, as I have stated here on YouTube repeatedly, believe it is some type of a "Give me something to believe in " syndrome. Some people, in their life, feel some type of void and decide to fill it with bullshit whether it carries merit or not. What can a person do, really ? Just try to inform now and again and let nature take its course I guess.
ReneeNme 3 weeks ago
FUCK SCIENCE lol.... all i need is god
OriginalNex 3 weeks ago
2012 is a load of shit.
that is all.
AngrySensai 3 weeks ago
Wow did this start over a movie eh?
cbymic 4 weeks ago
Can't wait for all the idiots who believe this rubbish hiding under their rocks when 2012 ends when all we will get is a twinkling falling star.
STHFGDBY 4 weeks ago
@STHFGDBY I can't wait either, want to know why? Because the babbling idiots will be under the rocks where I can't hear them yap about this dumb shit any longer :D
55varian 4 weeks ago
ya ya ya it's the truth aaaa you can aaaaa we have hard events
IXxdimonxXI 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
MY GOAL BEFORE WORLD END................BANG PINK TACOS PUT SOME HOT SAUCE ON IT AND LICK IT
CHOTICHATRI007 1 month ago
The thing is, planet nibiru, "end" of Mayian calendar, solar Maximus, planetary alignment. Etc. were all speculated around 12/21/12.
madgreenb 1 month ago
@madgreenb Yes, the end of the Mayan calendar is on that date. So what?
Planet Nibiru? Planetary alignment? Got any evidence for those, or just internet speculation?
The solar maximum happens every 11 years, and just happens to roughly coincide. So what?
ThreeFangCat 1 month ago
@ThreeFangCat hmmmm....A chemist simpleton , with a massive ego
666starman1 4 weeks ago
@666starman1 Whatever.
ThreeFangCat 4 weeks ago
This better be true I swear
1liltom 1 month ago
you know most people believe that the egyptians used jews as slaves to build pyramids, without proof..
at least nebiru WAS ON A SUMARIAN DRAWING THING IT WAS SO AWESOME! i bet we already found the planet. i mean they. (the scientists what only show the planet as a little ball because "their telescopes isnt good enough to show us a close up" WHEN THE GO BEYOND THAT PLANET WAAAY FURTHER TO SHOW US ANOTHER PLANET.. AS A LITTLE BALL! OR JUST DRAWING A FAKE PLANET AND TELLING US ITS REAL!
SpeshuuAnunnaki 1 month ago
im not worried about planets hitting us in 2012 im worried about the goverments killing people off and blaming niburu or whatever they can come up with remember the last time 911 ...do you think nasa idiots now the truth they dont they are on the kill off list to ! oh and by the way we pilots have a old joke about spam in a can ,,,and anything nasa puts in space is space junk befor it leaves the pad not after lol i have TURDS with more computing power the the SHUTTLE SMART PHONE STUPID SHUTTLE
g6rcteam 1 month ago
@g6rcteam If you're worried about governments trying to blame dastardly actions on 'Nibiru', the best way to prevent this kind of thing is to establish a greater level of expectation of evidence when claims are presented.
For example, what evidence do you have about who's on the 'kill off list'? You act as if you know, but you give no evidence for this.
ThreeFangCat 1 month ago
@siritzo end a new cycle begins dec. 22nd 2012. right?
lyndapies 1 month ago
Why do they continue to lie
OneMoreThingToDoo 1 month ago
@OneMoreThingToDoo That's an unfair, loaded question. Before you can ask why someone lies, you have to PROVE they did lie. You didn't.
ThreeFangCat 1 month ago
@sniritzo world economys have done this before
USA-1929s Great Depression--- RECOVERED
Soviet Union-1950s Loss in money--- HAVENT RECOVERED
England 1500s through 2011- Relied on countries and got Shited on--- THEY KEEP RECOVERING.
Also did you know religions, christians specifically have predicted the world would end 7 times l(LAST ONE MAY 25) and all have failed The 21st will be the 8th to fail.
Noobkillerof2011 1 month ago
my beans expire in 2014!!!!
2012 is a lie but just watch what happens its gonna kik off!!! illuminati prjects are here!!!
oIFLaShx 1 month ago
Well Timmy, a scientist has calmly and logically explained to you why it's going to be ok in 2012, what are you going to do? Timmy: I'm going to believe in it even more, and disregard even further anything anyone tells me which is contrary to what I previously believed. - Now that's not very scientific Timmy. Timmy: Scientists don't know as much as I do about 2012.
the81stviewer 1 month ago in playlist Alien Worlds 12
@the81stviewer Hahahaha ... There is a ton of truth in your post.
ReneeNme 3 weeks ago
@the81stviewer You talkin about Timmy from Southpark?
dukethehero 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
o boy! This guy just proved that there's something fishy about 2012 cause think about it hes tryna calm people down n let the truth not b spread out If nothing was gonna happen in 2012 why the hell would NASA even care about the bullshit internet always makes up, but they did 4 2012 cause they know whats up with them n area 51 n aliens :D now if u will excuse me i have to play pokemon HG
Mr007eds 1 month ago
o boy! This guy just proved that there's something fishy about 2012 cause think about it hes tryna calm people down n let the truth not b spread out If nothing was gonna happen in 2012 why the hell would NASA even care about the bullshit internet always makes up, but they did 4 2012 cause they know whats up with them n area 51 n aliens :D now if u will excuse me i have to play pokemon HG
Mr007eds 1 month ago
@Mr007eds Your logic is tremendously flawed. NASA has long run a question and answer service called 'Ask an Astrobiologist'. In it, people have sent in a lot of Emails with concern over 2012. NASA's concern over the issue is a simple extension of that.
As for your assumptions regarding area 51 and aliens, that has nothing to do with it. I will note, however, you are assuming yourself to be correct on those issues.
ThreeFangCat 1 month ago
OK! Let's see.
1. He is not expecting anything around 2012 ? What about the State of the World right now? is it really ok? This guy was put here on Purpose !! There is no planet "NIBURU" ? or NIBIRU you mean? funny NASA is admit about the existence of this planet years ago.. No Telescopic evidence ? are you for real? Extraordinary Claims requires extraordinary MONEY he means.. before the evidence
sniritzo 1 month ago
@sniritzo .. there is no evidence ( Repeat it Again ) for dummies or mentally disabled people.. The Mayan calendar dies not end in 2012 ? Says a guy that works In Jet Propulsion Lab NEOP .. that has nothing to do with history or he does? he continues his show regarding the Mayans as an expert ofc .. Bla Bla BLa .. Pathetic statements regarding the Mayan calendar in comparison with our own . LOL Can't be compared at all.. Google regarding the Mayans calendar any source on the NET and i mean any
sniritzo 1 month ago
@sniritzo To see that this guy is full of shit.. Aha about the sun activity.. so it is expected around 2012 after all ? and we have nothing to fear ? really ?
so i guess the 350% increase in satellites launches in orbit of the earth is just for fun and upgrades of the communication systems in this time of great economical crisis.. i guess USA doing well after 9/11 deposit .. no problems spend a few billions ..
sniritzo 1 month ago
@sniritzo HAHA There is a historic time of pole reversal ( followed by a professional visual effect with the hands ) 400.000 year scale ?? OMG this guy did not do his homework really... Google that also.. and again !!! The KEYWORDS - AND THERE IS NO EVIDENCE WHATSOEVER !!! ( Parrot ) that would not effect ? ( followed even if it did ) bla bla bla... There won't be any planetary alignments ? ...... but and even if there were it wouldn't be an effect only the sun and moon effect earth movement?
sniritzo 1 month ago
@sniritzo i am telling you this statement is for mentally dead people i guess .. so be very carefull where you get the information on the web ONLY BELIEVE NASA VERIFIED INFORMATION CAUSE NASA ALWAYS SPEAKS THE TRUTH THE ALL TRUTH AND NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH SO HELP HER GOD !!!
Peace ...
Draw your conclusions..
sniritzo 1 month ago
@sniritzo 400,000 years is an approximation. Some magnetosphere pole reversals occur over a period of less years ( 200,000 ? ) and some occur over a period of more years. Actually, the last magnetosphere pole reversal occurred over 800,000+ years ago and scientists say we are long overdue for another.
ReneeNme 1 month ago
@ReneeNme approximation? is like me saying this to you you will die in approximately 1000 years! you believe me ? no? but why? it is only a approximation. There are some facts that reversals occurs every 4k-8k years also you know!! either way none is laying any kind of evidence cause they simply can't... or won't? Don't misunderstand me i am not up for conspiracy theory it is only common logic..
sniritzo 1 month ago
@sniritzo The term 'pole reversal' is rather vague. Earth has geomagnetic reversals which take place once every few hundred thousand years, on average. OTOH, the doomsayers also speak of changes in the axial pole of rotation or even a full crustal shift. Until evidence comes forward for such events, they can be regarded as rubbish.
Further, this history of mass extinctions and geomagnetic reversals are both known. Yet, nobody has shown a coincidence between the two.
ThreeFangCat 1 month ago
@ThreeFangCat Just ask yourself if any of us can give any evidence regarding events of that scale.. it is nearly impossible you need an enormous financial bases to even get a hints of those evidence well they know that... also regarding " Earth geomagnetic reversals which take place once every few hundred thousand years " this is a non evidence statement cause there is " NO EVIDENCE " regarding this timetable.. the only evidence that is backed up is that the event happens.
sniritzo 1 month ago
@sniritzo So that is what it comes down to: when asked for evidence you say you are incapable of producing it. However, I see you're not shy about unfounded claims.
As for what evidence is available to the average person, consulting the scientific literature is acceptable. That would be an example of bringing evidence.
ThreeFangCat 1 month ago
@ThreeFangCat well first of all i did not claim anything... besides the fact that this scientist is a puppet and out of his field regarding this matter... he shout over and over again the same phrase about evidences that's why i also use this.. and furthermore for me NASA facts or evidences is " NOT " scientific literature .. cause NASA is operates under the command of the USA government Secret Services. At 9/11 USA image commit suicide under the same orders of the same services..
sniritzo 1 month ago
@sniritzo You've make quite a few claims and continue to do so. Here is one from your very first post:
"NASA is admit about the existence of this planet years ago"
So let's not go into this delusion you haven't made claims. Then you continue with yet more, most amusingly that NASA operates under the Secret Services. All the while I show you the evidence and you summarily ignore it.
As for your questions, unless you have a claim backed by evidence, they just don't matter. And you don't.
ThreeFangCat 1 month ago
@sniritzo For example, let's take a look at the wiki entry on Geomagnetic Reversal. If you scroll to the bottom, you'll see 48 footnote reference citing the evidence the article draws upon to make the statements it does. Sources include journals like Earth Pand Planetary Science Letters, Nature, Journal of Geophysical Research, etc. All of them peer-reviewed and quite respected.
Do you not agree with them? Why so?
ThreeFangCat 1 month ago
@sniritzo NASA has NEVER admitted to the existence of a " Nibiru " other than NASA's senior scientist David Morrison commenting that the name " Nibiru " is associated with the babylonian / sumerian god Marduk and that according to their astrology belief system the planet Jupiter ( Nibiru ) was representative of the god Marduk. And in this, Mr. Morrison is absolutely correct.
ReneeNme 1 month ago
@ReneeNme Ooo Really ??
how about reading a bit try to Google regarding this study and then come back and comment again!
sniritzo 1 month ago
@ReneeNme Can you play ,Dirty deeds done dirt cheap ,on your air guitar ?, and don't fall from your pram crying again bitch
666starman1 4 weeks ago
@666starman1 Dirty Deeds ? Talk about a simple song to play. Night Prowler. Now THAT is a little bit more of a challenge. Cry some moar ?
ReneeNme 4 weeks ago
@sniritzo The state of the world right now has nothing to do with astronomical issues. Whether is terrible or wonderful, the likelyhood of an astronomical disaster is determined from the physical evidence.
You seem to claim there is, in fact, evidence for 2012 claims. OK, well that sentiment will mean something if you can actually make a tangible claim and back it with this supposed evidence. Vague statements and calls for the listener to back your claims don't count.
ThreeFangCat 1 month ago
@ThreeFangCat Has nothing to do?? you have evidence to back up this statement ? If any astronomical event of that scale was to happen trust me the economy state going to be the first symptoms .. To know the future either is 1 day ahead or 10 years give you a huge advantage as long as you keep your mouth shut..
sniritzo 1 month ago
@sniritzo As you were the one that equated world events to astronomical events, the evidence is yours to produce. It is not my burden simply because I disagree. And while I agree with the notion a definitive astronomical event could effect the world economy, I do not agree with your implication that bad things will happen in astronomical terms in 2012 just because things aren't so peach on Earth.
ThreeFangCat 1 month ago
@ThreeFangCat Have you wondered though why the world economy suddenly is shattered to pieces? Have you Really? Have you build any scenarios? Have you asked yourself why the earth biggest nations have this kind of behavior this suddenly ? New World Order ? Astronomical Event ? Doomsday ? I don't know i just know that all this is not random events ... I use logic nothing more..
sniritzo 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
THERE WILL BE NO FUTURE WITHOUT GOD !!!
GET READY NOW!!!
thewarningsecondcoming . com
JezusSlave 1 month ago
I'm glad that NASA is one of the few American groups that actually knows how to think and evaluate before they go shouting out so called "news" all over the internet, it's terrifying how idiotic humans can be sometimes
howSTUPIDareYOU12101 1 month ago
@howSTUPIDareYOU12101 NASA is all this? are you sure? NASA is more like
National Astronomical Security Agency
National Association of Special Agents
New Advanced Search Agent
or Never A Straight Answer
But it is not all that you say for sure !!
sniritzo 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
If you want to know about the end of the world. the sunrise in the west
signs of the end of the world. Dajjal will come out of the earth's surface. many an earthquake, hurricanes, tsunamis and volcanoes will occur. all creatures will die on that day and no one will live for the day. (Antichrist is a big giant creatures)
hazeqfarhan 1 month ago
Hahaha
Stupid ppl
Dnt know how they get these stuff from!
Thanks for this video :))
o0professional0o 1 month ago
booooring... bring up the apocalypse now!
feixbix 1 month ago
WE WILL ALL DIE IN APPROXIMATELY 6 hours and 42 minutes. The Mayans changed the date, didn't you see the memo? Lol too many different things going on in terms of these theories. One can hope though right?
CIgnoramus 1 month ago
Biggest relief of my life
maniacmanist 1 month ago
Thumbs up if u are going to watch 2012 in 2013 :D
TheInVisebleCock 1 month ago 39
@TheInVisebleCock Definitely :DDD
SurfaceCollison 3 weeks ago
reeneenme what does that mean?
lyndapies 1 month ago
@lyndapies That, according to some experts, the Mayan calendar might not actually end until 2062 or 2072 instead of 2012.
ReneeNme 1 month ago
so the mayan calender still ends on dec 21 2012? I'm hearing it ends on oct. 28 2011 and then I heard it ends on dec. 24 2011 I'm so confused.
lyndapies 1 month ago
Comment removed
ReneeNme 1 month ago
Comment removed
ReneeNme 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@lyndapies Actually, some " qualified " researchers believe that the end of the Mayan calendar falls 50 to 60 years past Dec. 21st, 2012.
As if you weren't confused about the ending date enough already : P
ReneeNme 1 month ago
@lyndapies On October is the end of a cycle and then the last cycle begins till 21-12-2012 That the final Cycle is come to an end ! ( Always according the Mayans )
sniritzo 1 month ago
omg, i said i will post the name tomoz when i dig out the documentary, you said the galactic alignment happens every year not that it occurs at the same time as the winter solstice, that is getting them mixed up. i will reply tomoz
MegaPete2011 1 month ago
@MegaPete2011 OK, so 'tomoz' is tomorrow?
Anyway, information on solar max are located on my channel comments, two posts one 7 and the other 8 months ago. This is why, depending on what you get quotes, you may get a different take on it. The prediction changed.
The galactic alignment and winter solstice are both yearly events, occurring at about the same time, albeit for different reasons.
If you read my channel comments, you'll find I'm a stickler for sources. Why? Because it matters.
ThreeFangCat 1 month ago
You still watched it on you tube and i did know that that was your dr, how do you know the one i watched was vague as you didn't watch it, i will reply with the docs name for you tomoz, I was following your logic though and believing exactly what the nasa scientist said, my problem was that i have seen two different scientists saying two different things both from nasa. If you got the the winter solstice and the galactic alignment mixed tbh your not really worth having a debate with
MegaPete2011 1 month ago
@MegaPete2011 The point here is that you cannot cite some 'nasa SCIENTIST' from some TV show you saw and act as if that is meaningful. It isn't. You keep saying you see two scientists from NASA saying different things, WHICH TWO? It's really simple, answer the question.
ThreeFangCat 1 month ago
@MegaPete2011 PS: The point I was trying to make is the galactic alignment coincides with the winter solstice. That's not getting them mixed up.
ThreeFangCat 1 month ago
@MegaPete2011 Galactic Alignment : This is a term that many 2012 authors throw about. They LOVE to take a stirring stick and mix the term " Galactic Alignment " to include Axial Precession, Earth crossing the Galactic Plane, and the Winter Solstice which tends to confuse many people. This is what they do, this is how they sell books, they deceive. Truth of the matter being is that there is no alignment that we should be concerned about come December of 2012. NONE !!!
ReneeNme 1 month ago
i seen a nasa SCIENTIST on tv wtf did you see Dr Yeomans on mate? i hope you went to see him in person
MegaPete2011 1 month ago
@MegaPete2011 The guy in this video IS Dr Yeomans. What you're comparing him to is some vague 'nasa SCIENTIST' you saw on TV, but cannot quote or name.
ThreeFangCat 1 month ago
@comicman34 - How? It will be here in less than two weeks.
zeligspalace 1 month ago
Well the mayans speak bull because they didn't predict that we would universary reset our calender after the birth of Jesus (if it happened) but still we changed the years, so in the sense of the mayan calendar it has been and gone, but obvs was not here as I am currently typing this bullshit which I dont know why, Fuck me Im bored, Im off to play some Xbox
MegaCOYS 1 month ago
@MegaCOYS fool!
MegaPete2011 1 month ago
i watched a nasa scientist on a discovery program confirming the galactic alignment and increased solar activity, which one is lying
MegaPete2011 1 month ago
@MegaPete2011 Did you seriously just ask what is more credible, science or TV?
ThreeFangCat 1 month ago
@ThreeFangCat no where did i ask that?
MegaPete2011 1 month ago