@Edom35 какой еще долг ? Не тебе мы случайно должны ? То что Россия должна была евробанкам давно уже отдали , а то сколько Россия простила долгов другим странам только Бог знает . Вам там в Америке средства массовой информации ссыт в уши а вы слушаете, не будте такими наивными. Доброго дня.
whats not to like about these? there well made and have been proven on the battlefeild exept the black eagle (will not reach fulltime production due to maitenence costs and the cost itself + problems that cant be sussed out) the tanks before these sadly though were no match for any american tank and its hard to say if these ones would be...maybe cause of the speed...but the ameican beast is also fast....but a serious target from the air due to the jet engines it uses to power that monster
Considering in "Operatiion Telic" (as we British call it ) The Challenger 2 saw much more Combat and had NO COMBAT LOSSES as opposed to SEVEN Abrams Distroyed by IRAQI forces.
The Challenger 2 /Leopard 2 (Germany)/ Type 99 (China) & Black Eagle (Russia) ALL surpass the Abrams in Firepower/Reliablity/Range & Ease of Manufacture. The "Abrams" is just a Biword for the People who Disigned and Built it. :)
@michaelfergusonuk Also the men and women driving the T95 will have the propper training, so go invade Russia and see what happens lol the result will be the same!!! :):):)
@RenegadeArms09 How typical in the end it comes down to training fool!!! Its not just about who has the most advanced tank!!! lol people like you make me laugh.
@Mr0982mmawarrior And retarded saps like you make me laugh, I dont care if you have the best training in the world, it wont do shit if you have a piss poor tank.
@RenegadeArms09 So im to listen to what you say when old equipment cant kill you??? That is absolute folly just so you know fool!!! In the Mid East old equipment still kills and mames people everyday you idiot!!! for example if i were to take a ww1 gun and point it at you trust me dude your still gonna die!!! and you sir have nothing to bring to the table!!! So no your abrams m1a2's etc will be destroyed just as fast as they are produced !!! :):):) Now go get bent you fuckin croc.
@RenegadeArms09 Underpowered? Its power-to-weight is higher then Abrams, has guided missiles unlike Abrams, Han be easily equipped with active protection systems unlike Abrams, can jump, MUCH more reliable then abrams, lighter, with higher off-road capability then Abrams. Abrams would smash it? In your mind maybe. In reality - never in one-on-one fight.
@Mr0982mmawarrior As i am British i am INFINATLY more qualifyed to Talk about Tanks SINCE WE INVENTED THEM!!! Furthermore as i said before it's the COMBAT RESULTS/Performance & General Stats that let the ""ABRAMS"" Down (rather like the Soviet T34 was the more Combat effective Tank & was MILES AHEAD OF ANY U.S. TANK (Especaily a cirtain Example that was such a JOKE to the Germans that they referd to them as "Tommy Cookers" we Brits just called it "the Ronsen, Lights first time any time" :):):)
@michaelfergusonuk sir i have no trouble debating with you in the least infact i find it very.....interesting to say the least, its idiots like renegadearms so pompous and arrogant lol!!!
This is hilarious. As a ex-tanker in an US armored cavalry troop on the Check border, back in the sixties. During the Rooshan invasion we knew that Soviets had shitty bulldozer like tanks without even a suspension system. (dead track laying). The old M48 and M50s' that we had were at least capable of a neutral steer. I had a CD850 cross drive transmission so both tracks could turn in opposite directions during a turn. Watch the Roosisyky piece of shit lock up the track on one side to turn.
I still think that Western Tanks are better than the Russian tanks, just look at the statistics of both gulf wars. Coalition forces crushed the old soviet tanks, and they will destroy any new Russian tank in an eventual conflict, even the T-95 and Black eagle tank wouldn't stand a chance. The Russians can make tanks that look good, but really aren't.
@Augustusize The russian tanks from T-80 forward are a real threat to western tanks, and the reason that the tanks in the middle east where destroyed so easily is because they where un modified T-54/55's upto T-72 series tanks none of the current inservice russian variants.
That means nothing, many factors contributed to the gulf war outcome, on top of the fact that most tanks the Iraqis used were Chinese and locally built copies, moreover, they were copies of old and highly outdated tanks, the Iraqis used poor munitions, had poor training, absolutely no intel on enemy movements and besides that, most Iraqi tansk were destroyed by air power and not in tank on tank warfare.
@Augustusize WELL THAT IS A MATTER OF YOUR OPINION LOL!!! i pretty sure you have no idea what your talking about as usual and i probably dont even need to guess what country your from lol. T95 even stated by american experts, "IS THE NEST TANK IN THE WORLD". Number two if you had tank crew's that new what they were doing in the mid east trust me it wouldnt have been the same conflict also you had new tanks!!!
to Edom35, krabbfiskarnful... Guys , you words prove americans stupid. You better check US reputation all over the world. You would see people's reaction when they hear "american". Go cross US border and try to find a single person abroad who likes US. The whole f...ng world got tired of stupid american dream and stupid holywood movies.
@macrus123 Your just jealous.Your dumb-ass has been lied to all it's life. I feel bad for you, because you don't know the truth when it appears in front of your face. Your backward bigass country couldn't afford half the stuff the US just waists everyday. Your poor! You have traded one Tzar for another throughtout your countries history, you call them by different names. Really, who cares what the world thinks about the US in the big scheme of things it doesn't matter dude.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Nice to the russians are living up to their reputation and still STEALING ALL their Tech from others....ever since the AK was copied from the German SturmG 44. Can't trust the russians.
A person's music taste is not an indication of the musical taste of the entire nations. Those stupid bears, by the way, are responsible for quite a lot of clever things in both science and technology.
I really feelsorry for you and your tinky weenky that you torture every 3 hours on daily bases! that is the only thing you I suppose! insted(unlike all other of your dumb countrymen - US AMERICANS gg) read stuff, google stuff, wiki stuff! ask your dumb Mom, I don't know! DO SOMETHING instead of putting the garbage on YT that you herd from your long dead Grandma... learn, progress, revolve! dumb Yankee!
Kalashnikov did not steal anything, mate, he had no access to espionage or any intelligence. All countries use espionage to gather technological and scientific classified information, not just the soviets. However, the first serious tank was manufactured in USSR and the first supersonic vertical take off plane as well, not to mention many more first things. One can argue that most advances in the US AF came out after the WWII due to the German engineers who moved there. Your argument is stupid.
Read up stupid ass hole... did not steal, reinvented! where do you think US got the Jet technology! I think you are just as ignorant as your mother! Dumb Yankee!!!
I have to reproach you on your communication method. When you swear like that you only lowing yourself from a person who can sustain an argument to an ignorant individual who resorts to abuse. Using that kind of language is making all russians look bad.
@IrinaRus2014 The US got it's jet tech. from German scientists who were happy to share their info. and live in the land of plenty. Your backward ass country would have shot them for being Nazis and then realized "Oh, we could used those guys?" "Oh, well, we will steal it from the US when they develop it first." Dumb-Commies! hammer and sickle little boy
ok who knows wich will be better you can make a advanced tank but it comes down to the crew and how they use it, but this is how it works, russia makes somthing jet boat tank, and so on they say its the best then america makes a new one which they say is better then the russians do the some we do the same thats how it works, but every time american and russian weopons meet american weopons for the most part come out on top but who knows, what the tank can do on paper dosnt matter. field does.
people like to compare stuff with out technical and other type of knowlage about it... funny eh... t 95 can't go in the desert! m1a can't go in the mud well.. what to compare!
The T-95 (not with the Black Eagle (T-2000) to be confused) is a development of the T-80 and is the fourth generation of Russian battle tanks T-72 as the main weapon system of Russian armored forces to replace.
yeah ive seen it its a peice of crap i mean the gun cant elevate down much cant do the hull down plus if an t-80 can hit a target 3 miles away the size of a foot ball you think it cant hit a tank 1.9 meters high
russian T-95 MBT ("main battle tank") is only a prototype. it "has not been seen or photographed, and no concrete data has been released. It is expected to enter service after 2010... even the name T-95 is not authoritative" (enDOTwikipediaDOTorg/wiki/T-95). its crew will be only 1 person.
leo 2 M1A2 and mk4 can fire missile from the barrel !! anly the t90 has STABILIZER and its not as good as the m1 or leo2 or mk4 !! iwas in syrian army and i know russian tanks loses every time !!
Russian tanks dont even have STABILIZER like the M1A2 or LEO2 and Merkava 4 new fire control system very advanced features including the capability to acquire and lock onto moving targets, even airborne helicopters, while the tank itself is on the move !! in the Russian tank you have to stop the tank to fire hhhhh !!
lol Russian tank have a stabilizer and lock system it have too lol. go read about Rus tanks, Russian and German tanks were first who brought this features to moder tanks lol.
@mikeczcom it also means lighter armor and mobility is absolutely no match for modern targeting systems this tank was obsolete before it rolled off the production line
Abrahms? No my friend this is Russias newest tank T-95. All fit to western standarts with reactive Armour and all the funny stuff you need to be a real Ass-Kicker.
nice 1300 cp. 40-45 tons ,120 gun , this is sport car whit gun , verry good job
MegaAARES 3 weeks ago
@Edom35 какой еще долг ? Не тебе мы случайно должны ? То что Россия должна была евробанкам давно уже отдали , а то сколько Россия простила долгов другим странам только Бог знает . Вам там в Америке средства массовой информации ссыт в уши а вы слушаете, не будте такими наивными. Доброго дня.
veladzus 4 weeks ago
Ахуенно!
valeevadward 1 month ago
SICKEST SONG EVER
motomex79 1 month ago
Is it just me, or does the new T-95 Black Eagle look similar to western tank designs?
Bossman1603 8 months ago
cool video
creew96 11 months ago
Music?
NovyWRC 11 months ago
SUUUUUUPPPPEEEEERRRRRR!!!!!!!!!!!!
MrAMIGOs777 1 year ago
See this is why the russians are not to be fucked with.
whythewar1 1 year ago
UNDER WATER TANK ?
wtf ^^
floriancix883 1 year ago
whats not to like about these? there well made and have been proven on the battlefeild exept the black eagle (will not reach fulltime production due to maitenence costs and the cost itself + problems that cant be sussed out) the tanks before these sadly though were no match for any american tank and its hard to say if these ones would be...maybe cause of the speed...but the ameican beast is also fast....but a serious target from the air due to the jet engines it uses to power that monster
TheUnforgivingOne 1 year ago
NICE! realy hard core tank!
ete0 1 year ago
Outdated, underpowered and inefficient. That Abrams eats this bitch for breakfast. XD
RenegadeArms09 1 year ago
@RenegadeArms09 Bold Statement... if not Conpletly Wrong,
Considering in "Operatiion Telic" (as we British call it ) The Challenger 2 saw much more Combat and had NO COMBAT LOSSES as opposed to SEVEN Abrams Distroyed by IRAQI forces.
The Challenger 2 /Leopard 2 (Germany)/ Type 99 (China) & Black Eagle (Russia) ALL surpass the Abrams in Firepower/Reliablity/Range & Ease of Manufacture. The "Abrams" is just a Biword for the People who Disigned and Built it. :)
michaelfergusonuk 1 year ago
@michaelfergusonuk Also the men and women driving the T95 will have the propper training, so go invade Russia and see what happens lol the result will be the same!!! :):):)
Mr0982mmawarrior 1 year ago
@RenegadeArms09 How typical in the end it comes down to training fool!!! Its not just about who has the most advanced tank!!! lol people like you make me laugh.
Mr0982mmawarrior 1 year ago
@Mr0982mmawarrior And retarded saps like you make me laugh, I dont care if you have the best training in the world, it wont do shit if you have a piss poor tank.
RenegadeArms09 1 year ago
@RenegadeArms09 So im to listen to what you say when old equipment cant kill you??? That is absolute folly just so you know fool!!! In the Mid East old equipment still kills and mames people everyday you idiot!!! for example if i were to take a ww1 gun and point it at you trust me dude your still gonna die!!! and you sir have nothing to bring to the table!!! So no your abrams m1a2's etc will be destroyed just as fast as they are produced !!! :):):) Now go get bent you fuckin croc.
Mr0982mmawarrior 1 year ago
@RenegadeArms09 Underpowered? Its power-to-weight is higher then Abrams, has guided missiles unlike Abrams, Han be easily equipped with active protection systems unlike Abrams, can jump, MUCH more reliable then abrams, lighter, with higher off-road capability then Abrams. Abrams would smash it? In your mind maybe. In reality - never in one-on-one fight.
Spetsnazovets 1 year ago
@Mr0982mmawarrior As i am British i am INFINATLY more qualifyed to Talk about Tanks SINCE WE INVENTED THEM!!! Furthermore as i said before it's the COMBAT RESULTS/Performance & General Stats that let the ""ABRAMS"" Down (rather like the Soviet T34 was the more Combat effective Tank & was MILES AHEAD OF ANY U.S. TANK (Especaily a cirtain Example that was such a JOKE to the Germans that they referd to them as "Tommy Cookers" we Brits just called it "the Ronsen, Lights first time any time" :):):)
michaelfergusonuk 1 year ago
@michaelfergusonuk sir i have no trouble debating with you in the least infact i find it very.....interesting to say the least, its idiots like renegadearms so pompous and arrogant lol!!!
Mr0982mmawarrior 1 year ago
Cool video and i can tell you as a tankie I would hate be in the turret with the tank doing the jumps that these ones where.
junnu159753 1 year ago
This is hilarious. As a ex-tanker in an US armored cavalry troop on the Check border, back in the sixties. During the Rooshan invasion we knew that Soviets had shitty bulldozer like tanks without even a suspension system. (dead track laying). The old M48 and M50s' that we had were at least capable of a neutral steer. I had a CD850 cross drive transmission so both tracks could turn in opposite directions during a turn. Watch the Roosisyky piece of shit lock up the track on one side to turn.
geochm 1 year ago
I still think that Western Tanks are better than the Russian tanks, just look at the statistics of both gulf wars. Coalition forces crushed the old soviet tanks, and they will destroy any new Russian tank in an eventual conflict, even the T-95 and Black eagle tank wouldn't stand a chance. The Russians can make tanks that look good, but really aren't.
Augustusize 1 year ago
@Augustusize The russian tanks from T-80 forward are a real threat to western tanks, and the reason that the tanks in the middle east where destroyed so easily is because they where un modified T-54/55's upto T-72 series tanks none of the current inservice russian variants.
junnu159753 1 year ago
@Augustusize
That means nothing, many factors contributed to the gulf war outcome, on top of the fact that most tanks the Iraqis used were Chinese and locally built copies, moreover, they were copies of old and highly outdated tanks, the Iraqis used poor munitions, had poor training, absolutely no intel on enemy movements and besides that, most Iraqi tansk were destroyed by air power and not in tank on tank warfare.
vtkrey 1 year ago
@Augustusize WELL THAT IS A MATTER OF YOUR OPINION LOL!!! i pretty sure you have no idea what your talking about as usual and i probably dont even need to guess what country your from lol. T95 even stated by american experts, "IS THE NEST TANK IN THE WORLD". Number two if you had tank crew's that new what they were doing in the mid east trust me it wouldnt have been the same conflict also you had new tanks!!!
Mr0982mmawarrior 1 year ago
55 ha BTR got raped
MrChiefAsparagus 1 year ago
geil !!!
FuLLyFuckeR 1 year ago
to Edom35, krabbfiskarnful... Guys , you words prove americans stupid. You better check US reputation all over the world. You would see people's reaction when they hear "american". Go cross US border and try to find a single person abroad who likes US. The whole f...ng world got tired of stupid american dream and stupid holywood movies.
macrus123 1 year ago
@macrus123 Your just jealous.Your dumb-ass has been lied to all it's life. I feel bad for you, because you don't know the truth when it appears in front of your face. Your backward bigass country couldn't afford half the stuff the US just waists everyday. Your poor! You have traded one Tzar for another throughtout your countries history, you call them by different names. Really, who cares what the world thinks about the US in the big scheme of things it doesn't matter dude.
Edom35 1 year ago
@Edom35 Lmfao who has been lied to all his life???? hahahahahahaha
DanielTheSocialist1 3 months ago
right title is russian junk
eee545 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Nice to the russians are living up to their reputation and still STEALING ALL their Tech from others....ever since the AK was copied from the German SturmG 44. Can't trust the russians.
Edom35 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Thats becuase Russians are stupid bears.
Just uploading this stupid video proves your intelligense is below 50 IQ.
And the music sucks!
Yes its sucks. Its not even music...
krabbfiskarnful 2 years ago
A person's music taste is not an indication of the musical taste of the entire nations. Those stupid bears, by the way, are responsible for quite a lot of clever things in both science and technology.
ahamayoisac 2 years ago
If they are so stupid! Why the "most" "powerfull" country in the world was and looks like still paranoid about Russia... ignorance is a curse! 4 USA!
IrinaRus2014 1 year ago
I really feelsorry for you and your tinky weenky that you torture every 3 hours on daily bases! that is the only thing you I suppose! insted(unlike all other of your dumb countrymen - US AMERICANS gg) read stuff, google stuff, wiki stuff! ask your dumb Mom, I don't know! DO SOMETHING instead of putting the garbage on YT that you herd from your long dead Grandma... learn, progress, revolve! dumb Yankee!
IrinaRus2014 1 year ago
Kalashnikov did not steal anything, mate, he had no access to espionage or any intelligence. All countries use espionage to gather technological and scientific classified information, not just the soviets. However, the first serious tank was manufactured in USSR and the first supersonic vertical take off plane as well, not to mention many more first things. One can argue that most advances in the US AF came out after the WWII due to the German engineers who moved there. Your argument is stupid.
ahamayoisac 2 years ago
so is da u.s.
uyrhrmt 1 year ago
Read up stupid ass hole... did not steal, reinvented! where do you think US got the Jet technology! I think you are just as ignorant as your mother! Dumb Yankee!!!
IrinaRus2014 1 year ago
I have to reproach you on your communication method. When you swear like that you only lowing yourself from a person who can sustain an argument to an ignorant individual who resorts to abuse. Using that kind of language is making all russians look bad.
ahamayoisac 1 year ago
@IrinaRus2014 The US got it's jet tech. from German scientists who were happy to share their info. and live in the land of plenty. Your backward ass country would have shot them for being Nazis and then realized "Oh, we could used those guys?" "Oh, well, we will steal it from the US when they develop it first." Dumb-Commies! hammer and sickle little boy
Edom35 1 year ago
@Edom35
You're so right! Everything's bigger in America.
Even the national debt of 14 277 403 000 000 USD,
how you say... plenty? Yeah that's kind of plenty.
Have a nice frigging day)
ewffy1 10 months ago 2
T-80U rule so nice
bengacris 2 years ago
T-95 and black eagle - different tanks!
Pirotehnik1996 2 years ago
t 90 best
tonijocevski 2 years ago
oh i didn't knew Americans had brains :))))))
Ericosproduction 3 years ago 2
ok who knows wich will be better you can make a advanced tank but it comes down to the crew and how they use it, but this is how it works, russia makes somthing jet boat tank, and so on they say its the best then america makes a new one which they say is better then the russians do the some we do the same thats how it works, but every time american and russian weopons meet american weopons for the most part come out on top but who knows, what the tank can do on paper dosnt matter. field does.
firefatkid 3 years ago 2
This is the year that T95 enters mass production! I just can't wait to see the new generation of Russian tanks. They must be awesome! Slava Russia!
shockolanu 3 years ago 3
t-90 its noth wolf abrams desert CAMEL.....
nuvargelis 3 years ago 3
Abrams is totally different type of tank, its really not a rival to the T90
ahamayoisac 2 years ago
m60 or Leopard 1 is rivals to t-90.
krabbfiskarnful 2 years ago
None of them are rivals, each army uses hardware to support its general tactical style. Arguments such as yours are simply childish.
ahamayoisac 2 years ago
people like to compare stuff with out technical and other type of knowlage about it... funny eh... t 95 can't go in the desert! m1a can't go in the mud well.. what to compare!
IrinaRus2014 1 year ago
good point, i mentioned tactical styles but terrain is just as important.
:)
ahamayoisac 1 year ago
The T-95 (not with the Black Eagle (T-2000) to be confused) is a development of the T-80 and is the fourth generation of Russian battle tanks T-72 as the main weapon system of Russian armored forces to replace.
Gstyle1 3 years ago
T-90 Best!!!!!!!!!!!!
flashback867 3 years ago 29
@flashback867
(Thats a T-80)
m1up 1 year ago
I don't know about RU But the U.S. army has got a secret tank..it has 2 crew and its flat....
>.>
EselFauler 3 years ago
no it doesnt
TadlosClan 3 years ago 2
WOW a secret tank? No shit? coooooool. And how it call?
zaksranez 2 years ago
yeah ive seen it its a peice of crap i mean the gun cant elevate down much cant do the hull down plus if an t-80 can hit a target 3 miles away the size of a foot ball you think it cant hit a tank 1.9 meters high
tankexpert 2 years ago
what's a piece of crap?
ahamayoisac 2 years ago
The T-90 already has the Shtora and Arena, so I wonder what is next.
vtkrey 3 years ago 3
russian T-95 MBT ("main battle tank") is only a prototype. it "has not been seen or photographed, and no concrete data has been released. It is expected to enter service after 2010... even the name T-95 is not authoritative" (enDOTwikipediaDOTorg/wiki/T-95). its crew will be only 1 person.
here is only sort of sketch:
finizDOTru/economic/article1246289
hoktula 3 years ago
we have T80 in the syrian army thats when i was in the Army in 1996 !! they say syria has some T90s in 2004 !!
sargon08 3 years ago 2
do u think syrians get the newest T-90 version ?! they can get old 70th. tanks ... dumbass
AnimaStyle 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
ho is fucking syria ?? they have no win any War
Israel have Fuck Syria + Agypt
1967 - 1973 is this not enough ?
and ISrael have Fuck Syria Army 1982 in libanan
wat is Syria ??
nor Russia is not sending Wappend for no money !
syria wnt Wappens becouse they dontwont pay money
russia is not Idiot this time is Over
Perserpolis 3 years ago
leo 2 M1A2 and mk4 can fire missile from the barrel !! anly the t90 has STABILIZER and its not as good as the m1 or leo2 or mk4 !! iwas in syrian army and i know russian tanks loses every time !!
sargon08 3 years ago
Russian tanks dont even have STABILIZER like the M1A2 or LEO2 and Merkava 4 new fire control system very advanced features including the capability to acquire and lock onto moving targets, even airborne helicopters, while the tank itself is on the move !! in the Russian tank you have to stop the tank to fire hhhhh !!
sargon08 3 years ago
lol Russian tank have a stabilizer and lock system it have too lol. go read about Rus tanks, Russian and German tanks were first who brought this features to moder tanks lol.
DremDC 3 years ago
Wild Crasy Russian Power
kankalidi 3 years ago
russians are awsome i wish they were on our side.
Thatbritishlad1 3 years ago
definetly 1 of the 3 best tanks the challenger 2 the leapord 2 and the t 95
Thatbritishlad1 3 years ago
the t-95 is too small have only 50 t
the Leopard and Merkava and M1 have 70 T
Perserpolis 3 years ago
small but more agile... and more agile means harder to destroy....
mikeczcom 3 years ago 20
@mikeczcom it also means lighter armor and mobility is absolutely no match for modern targeting systems this tank was obsolete before it rolled off the production line
hotpocketpoison 10 months ago
@mikeczcom and bigger gun
MultiFirsttry 7 months ago
An Infantry squad vs. Tank
The infantry would win no matter what tank it is.
freddymagick 3 years ago
russian tanks is best!
riverman33 3 years ago 3
First Reallife shot i see from T-95, thx for posting impressive lill thing :)
Maxuskrachus 3 years ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
m1 abrams.. HAHAHAHAAHA!!!
nbharakey 4 years ago
Abrahms? No my friend this is Russias newest tank T-95. All fit to western standarts with reactive Armour and all the funny stuff you need to be a real Ass-Kicker.
Maxuskrachus 3 years ago 4
I meant: Abrahms, you are piece of shit! Good-bye Abrahms!
nbharakey 3 years ago
And i said its no Abrahms its a fuckin T-95 u piece of dirt.
Have a nice day :)
Maxuskrachus 3 years ago
oh niiiiiice mih liiike
*happy little girl*
hozta 4 years ago