My dad has one of these and I personally think they fail in about every way except the fact that they can go in the snow and now they fail even more when it comes to safety.
People brag about how there Japanese vehicle gets such great gas mileage. This is accomplished by taking away 5-6-700pounds of metal to lighten the car up. There is no rocket science behind it. A roll bar in a race car weighs about 60lbs. The safety it give is priceless. When they claim fuel efficiency it means the safety is gone. Like the school teacher once said. My Honda get such great gas mileage and a month later she disappeared of the face of the earth.
@davidbonijr They create fuel economy by leaving out the metal. Its a very strange thing you commented because in the winter of 1992 I owned a 1980 Subaru 2 door sedan and was involved in a accident at 40 MPH no seat belt hit a Ford F-250 in the side for me it was a head on collision the same like you I walked away. This vehicle weighed in at 2300 LBS. I Thanked GOD that nothing happened to me and you should do the same because he determines if your allowed to stay or if you should go.
AHAHAHA i JUST made a comment on the Ford Edge about the dummys arm swinging out! this one did the same! (is it me or does his hand get jammed between the door and the door frame?
The structure and safety system remained largely unchanged for the 08 year thus the reason its the same safety rating. 08 was basically just a cosmetic makeover.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
ford escape - acceptable?
no wonder honda crv and toyota rav4 are leading in this category. people would bu american if they made vehicles as good as the japanese you know- safety, reliability.
Happened to me, but impact was on the passenger side, and 40mph, impacting a F-250. Everyone was fine, I walked away with a slight soreness in my shoulder from the seatbelt.
50mph. the problem is having the vehicles drive through a foot of styrofoam and into a block of concrete isn't a proper way to judge as the average person will hit another vehicle, not drive into a building. When hitting another vehicle, simple physics will state that the other vehicle will itself move forward. For someone not to hit their brakes before impact and just run into something is unlikely. So the vehicle would dive and possibly go under the vehicle in front. There are tons of holes.
As far as I know crash tests never exceed 56 km/h (yes : kilometers) because any crash stop above this speed will cause malor internal damages that will cause the death of the driver and passengers
The car crashes seldom happen dead front. Side damages are more lethal, but you cannot "test" them
It was increased from 35mph I believe just before 2000 model year for frontal collision. Also note, these are generally offset as it's more likely someone will 'clip' another vehicle, this video shows the worst that can happen if a driver tries to swerve around a vehicle from not paying attention at the last second. Side impact tests are done as well. This is why newer vehicles have standard side curtain air bags. Side impacts are done at 25mph (since I last checked).
thanks a lot for all these informations : I think they mean a lot for us common drivers as we always feel that a car accident means very high speed in bad conditions (night, slippery road, in a bad curve, "bad driver !", etc ) is not true
Conditions have everything to do with it. Speed is the larget factor. A head on impact at say, 80mph (unlikely as most freeways are divided), would render both vehicles as a write off and probably seriously injure, if not kill all occupants. The IIHS conducts test at 50mph as that would be generally the average speed from people driving over lines and into oncoming traffic while they eat their burger or talk on their cell phone. Also keep in mind that even a 40mph road, drivers will go faster.
lil fukr held up pretty well!i`m slightly amazed.my wife has an `04 model&it`s been a hell of a car.only complaint is THE FACTORY TIRES SUCK!!!ditched `em for goodyear fortera`s.problem solved.
I bought mine with near 130,000 miles on the V6 4WD and its still going very strong, only problem i've had is the little plastic tip on the end of the cruise control cable slips off so I had to tape it on haha
meh, i hated the interior and the standard fwd on the xlt, and the mazda v6 completely died on me on the highway under normal driving conditions. i just generally felt i could have gotten the same practicality out of owning a car, and with better mileage.
well maintained at 70k highway miles. one of my ignition coils went out, taking all of the others, as well as my engine computer with it. i've also had problems with front wheel alignment,and minor piston slap in the cold. it was decent car for me otherwise and from what i hear form other owners, maybe i just got a lemon. it was my dd and i just replaced it w/a 1989 trans am gta, but i might not even keep that car around for long, though.
antrax357M nice to hear that.i have a ranger to and i was wondering what kind of problems did have with if any.everyone i talk to have no problems until it hits 200,000 and they are minor.
well i just had to replace the clutch and just usual stuff like breaks, it just barely passed smog though, that will be a little bit of work but not for 2 years. nothing other than that, i still take it off roading and it runs like a champ
I believe it got 5 star rating on the frontside. The reason a car is made to crash like this is to absorb the impact. If the bumper was made from steel then the impact would of been much worse on the driver and resulted in a lower crash rating.
Ford's are shit. So, for that matter, are GM. They've both been churning out rubbish, poor quality, soulless, dull cars for years. Small wonder then that they are both in such financial dire straits.
People like you live in the past. The Ford Escape was one of the best compace Suv when it came out. You probably think that Japenese cars are the best in the whole wide world. Wake up this is 2007 time to step in the future
No, European cars ARE the best. Specifically from Germany and Sweden. Granted, American cars aren't as bad as Chinese, but that really doesn't say much. Case closed.
wake up man...Ford did better than Toyota recently...Its 2007...Fords are one of the ebst card ont he market...they have only been around for what? 104 years?
I think it's hilarious that everyone is ripping the piss out of exBMRguy... Look at the clip, I dunno about you but I wouldn't wanna be in that car! Sure, the Pontiac may be WORSE but BMR wasn't making a comparison, he was just saying the car was poorly built. As for the welfare recipients part, perhaps it was over the top, but I think his point was the cars are built on a budget to keep costs down and appeal to a wider market. Stop taking things to literally, stanbernadino and jessiejenn!
oh really exBMRguy? What do you drive? Toyota echo? Loser, Ill have you know i probably make more in a week then you do in a month, so screw you and your welfare comment, you probaly are just so pissed that YOU CANT AFFORD SOMETHING NICE ,and like i said i bet you drive a echo or better yet.. a dodge neon LOSER!!Ford DOES rank high up there!! where you get your info?
To say Ford is built for 'welfare recipients' is an arrogant and a dumb statement. I have a Ford which is a great car and I'm not a welfare recipient.
Another poor quality Ford product built by those that build for welfare recepients. Ford has never ranked high on any realibility study. Stay away from this junk.
I don't see how you can say that. The most important thing for crash test ratings is passenger compartment intrusion. There is little if no intrusion as a result of this test.
My dad has one of these and I personally think they fail in about every way except the fact that they can go in the snow and now they fail even more when it comes to safety.
NattDogg01 3 months ago
this is a 2005 and it sucks
Tweissgarber 5 months ago
If you listen close you can hear a guy at the end of the crash go WHOO!
evinrudeboy6601 8 months ago
It's called Maverick in Europe :P
BrunostNOR 8 months ago
Acceptable is not good enough for me
dave777blaster 9 months ago
the 2001-2007 Ford Escape was assembled in
Avon Lake, Ohio, United States
Jhongli City, Taiwan
Claycomo, Missouri, United States
Hai Duong, Vietnam
Hōfu, Yamaguchi, Japan
Santa Rosa, Laguna, Philippines
Annihilator1111 9 months ago
This model did ok. 3/4 rating
The 09-11 got a 4/4 perfect score
kostarae 11 months ago
People brag about how there Japanese vehicle gets such great gas mileage. This is accomplished by taking away 5-6-700pounds of metal to lighten the car up. There is no rocket science behind it. A roll bar in a race car weighs about 60lbs. The safety it give is priceless. When they claim fuel efficiency it means the safety is gone. Like the school teacher once said. My Honda get such great gas mileage and a month later she disappeared of the face of the earth.
Frank289100 1 year ago
... subaru...go compare a subaru forester to this...I was recently in a head on collision with my 2005 forester, going 50 mph...not a scratch
davidbonijr 3 months ago
@davidbonijr They create fuel economy by leaving out the metal. Its a very strange thing you commented because in the winter of 1992 I owned a 1980 Subaru 2 door sedan and was involved in a accident at 40 MPH no seat belt hit a Ford F-250 in the side for me it was a head on collision the same like you I walked away. This vehicle weighed in at 2300 LBS. I Thanked GOD that nothing happened to me and you should do the same because he determines if your allowed to stay or if you should go.
Frank289100 3 months ago
some guys in Poland could repair this and sell as a no colision car :D
jaggggy 1 year ago
This does not apply to the 08. The 08 is different and better.
MrMercLover 1 year ago
AHAHAHA i JUST made a comment on the Ford Edge about the dummys arm swinging out! this one did the same! (is it me or does his hand get jammed between the door and the door frame?
jamn2boost 1 year ago
40 mph is the standard speed for front crash tests
superkinze 2 years ago
this is wrong, it would have to be to the 07 model. 08 got a complete redesign, and that helped bump to the top
MusicKrazy2011 2 years ago 17
The structure and safety system remained largely unchanged for the 08 year thus the reason its the same safety rating. 08 was basically just a cosmetic makeover.
Planeguy13 2 years ago
no it means 2005-2008 (until the model was re-made.) basicly it means those were the years of that model...until they changed it.
jaffacake1578 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
ford escape - acceptable?
no wonder honda crv and toyota rav4 are leading in this category. people would bu american if they made vehicles as good as the japanese you know- safety, reliability.
truthscavenger 2 years ago
rav 4 is worse plus this is the older model
jaffacake1578 2 years ago
truthscavenger, if jap cars are so safe then why did honda have a recall on there air bags killing 6 people!
fordgt700hp 2 years ago 5
When?
FordCopChrist1995 2 years ago
japanise cars are death trapps...
jaffacake1578 2 years ago 2
@jaffacake1578 i have seen lot of dead people in honda city, looks like jap cars aint that tough
dalmationbreed 1 year ago
Happened to me, but impact was on the passenger side, and 40mph, impacting a F-250. Everyone was fine, I walked away with a slight soreness in my shoulder from the seatbelt.
electraman7 2 years ago 2
fast
joshnewkirk1 2 years ago
what speed was that ?
vincent7520 2 years ago
50mph. the problem is having the vehicles drive through a foot of styrofoam and into a block of concrete isn't a proper way to judge as the average person will hit another vehicle, not drive into a building. When hitting another vehicle, simple physics will state that the other vehicle will itself move forward. For someone not to hit their brakes before impact and just run into something is unlikely. So the vehicle would dive and possibly go under the vehicle in front. There are tons of holes.
RT360ci 2 years ago
50 mph seems quite fast !
As far as I know crash tests never exceed 56 km/h (yes : kilometers) because any crash stop above this speed will cause malor internal damages that will cause the death of the driver and passengers
The car crashes seldom happen dead front. Side damages are more lethal, but you cannot "test" them
vincent7520 2 years ago
It was increased from 35mph I believe just before 2000 model year for frontal collision. Also note, these are generally offset as it's more likely someone will 'clip' another vehicle, this video shows the worst that can happen if a driver tries to swerve around a vehicle from not paying attention at the last second. Side impact tests are done as well. This is why newer vehicles have standard side curtain air bags. Side impacts are done at 25mph (since I last checked).
RT360ci 2 years ago 2
thanks a lot for all these informations : I think they mean a lot for us common drivers as we always feel that a car accident means very high speed in bad conditions (night, slippery road, in a bad curve, "bad driver !", etc ) is not true
vincent7520 2 years ago
Conditions have everything to do with it. Speed is the larget factor. A head on impact at say, 80mph (unlikely as most freeways are divided), would render both vehicles as a write off and probably seriously injure, if not kill all occupants. The IIHS conducts test at 50mph as that would be generally the average speed from people driving over lines and into oncoming traffic while they eat their burger or talk on their cell phone. Also keep in mind that even a 40mph road, drivers will go faster.
RT360ci 2 years ago
not bad
grenadier86 2 years ago
dude lol ya man lol lol l,ol
grievace 3 years ago
At 0:16 you can hear an operator go "Whooh"!
I bet they never get tired of their job. :)
RacingCrashes 3 years ago
hmmm i have a question who invented the airbag
ChrisBennett18 3 years ago
john hetrick
whattheheck1000 3 years ago
ok is he like smart, stupid or just and airhead
ChrisBennett18 3 years ago
piece of glass cut the dummy's face at 0:46
JustinProductions767 3 years ago
the evaluation was...
structre safety cage accepetble
head and neck aceptable
chest good
left leg and foot aceptable
right foot and leg poor OVERALL EVALUATION ACCEPTABLE
grahamboy1010101010 3 years ago
gosh all of ford cars crash its door too
ohjy2837 3 years ago
smart airbags-nice!
smartkid1985 3 years ago
in europe speed is 56kph~34mph? WHAT is speed i USA?
coorvahmuch 3 years ago
I think it's almost the same (euroNCAP), but ADAC does tests at 80 kph.
007WITHLICENSETOKILL 3 years ago
no way jose! 80 kph was only for a research! the do test at 64 kph
Wiishit23456withvids 3 years ago
I'm not Jose, but I agree, they tested (at 80 kph) some cars with 5 star at 60 kph.
007WITHLICENSETOKILL 3 years ago
its 40 MPH
lilshane93 3 years ago
lil fukr held up pretty well!i`m slightly amazed.my wife has an `04 model&it`s been a hell of a car.only complaint is THE FACTORY TIRES SUCK!!!ditched `em for goodyear fortera`s.problem solved.
troyharless 3 years ago
Did your escape have goodyear wrangler hp tires? they were so smooth for my city's streets. I've mounted four toyo open country a/t on mine.
007WITHLICENSETOKILL 3 years ago
not wranglers.they were continental contitrac.they "cupped" to hell and back at around 32k and the treads weren`t even half way shot yet.
troyharless 3 years ago
this car is too solid lol the driver recive all the impact... the car need to be less solid in order to absorb the impact...
felixmorisset 3 years ago
if it was less solid it would've crushed the cockpit.
viktord1 3 years ago
Thats solid
Ethanerkul 3 years ago
THIS IS WHAT FORDS R MADE FOR
BASSCHAMP101 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
ew ford
horrorfreak889 3 years ago
Hmm...How did this get an Acceptible?! This was good..
Degrassi123 3 years ago 2
Comment removed
GMminivans9968 3 years ago
I know! I agree with you.
dogzles 3 years ago
this car sucks
horrorfreak889 3 years ago
I bought mine with near 130,000 miles on the V6 4WD and its still going very strong, only problem i've had is the little plastic tip on the end of the cruise control cable slips off so I had to tape it on haha
Tygur 3 years ago
looks like its preety safe.i like the style alot too. their are also alot of them on the road.
cabuco2006 3 years ago
It's only "Acceptable". 3/4 from the IIHS. There are better vehicles.
alexkvaskov 3 years ago
great vehicle, I own one, take it anywhere, on or off road...i suggest the V6 model
Doubledee90 3 years ago
noooooo! absolute shit-tastic vehicle. i used to own one.
MrMudip666 3 years ago
what didnt you like about it. i like the style and i have ridden in one before seems to ride good. the new ones are nicer style too.
cabuco2006 3 years ago
meh, i hated the interior and the standard fwd on the xlt, and the mazda v6 completely died on me on the highway under normal driving conditions. i just generally felt i could have gotten the same practicality out of owning a car, and with better mileage.
MrMudip666 3 years ago
completely died.wow..how many miles you have on it and what was wrong with it/ battery die
cabuco2006 3 years ago
well maintained at 70k highway miles. one of my ignition coils went out, taking all of the others, as well as my engine computer with it. i've also had problems with front wheel alignment,and minor piston slap in the cold. it was decent car for me otherwise and from what i hear form other owners, maybe i just got a lemon. it was my dd and i just replaced it w/a 1989 trans am gta, but i might not even keep that car around for long, though.
MrMudip666 3 years ago
I took on an f250 head on in my old 2001 ford escape, at 45mph, and we both walked away without a scratch....
electraman7 3 years ago
That had some hang time.
UInACrash 3 years ago
The a-pillar deformed. NOT GOOD.
Although, in my mk1 Golf GTI, the b-pillar would probably deform as well. ;)
MDSE2 3 years ago
sorry, which ones the "a" piller?
Iridium725 3 years ago
the very first one, that is between the windshield and front door window frames.
MrMudip666 3 years ago
Why aren't cars lined with thin, light rubber on the outside?
Borateen 4 years ago
for?
firedemon101 4 years ago 8
Dent & scratch prevention.
Borateen 4 years ago
it would peal off
zloben9000 3 years ago
@Borateen like tupperware?
Martin00028Guitar 1 year ago
f ucking
o verwhelming
r ide
d uh!
t2m253 4 years ago
Fucked
On
Race
Day
midgetmayo 4 years ago 2
ford FOUND ON ROAD DEAD
hypersupermamado 4 years ago
after 267k miles my ranger wont be dead until well into 300k its still running strong
AnthraX357M 4 years ago 3
antrax357M nice to hear that.i have a ranger to and i was wondering what kind of problems did have with if any.everyone i talk to have no problems until it hits 200,000 and they are minor.
cabuco2006 3 years ago
well i just had to replace the clutch and just usual stuff like breaks, it just barely passed smog though, that will be a little bit of work but not for 2 years. nothing other than that, i still take it off roading and it runs like a champ
AnthraX357M 3 years ago
Sir #1 that bumper was garbage ford plastic #2 That SUV was so light it just bounced off the wall and got lucky #3 Fords are garbage.
KiroTheGreat 4 years ago
I believe it got 5 star rating on the frontside. The reason a car is made to crash like this is to absorb the impact. If the bumper was made from steel then the impact would of been much worse on the driver and resulted in a lower crash rating.
SOULM4VERICK 4 years ago 2
woah.. i cant tell if thats good or bad.. i think its good. but thats what they call a 5 Star
halflife103 4 years ago
3 stars
firedemon101 4 years ago
@firedemon101 I really don't get that...I've seen other crash tests and this one looked pretty darn good comparatively.
MDCeasar 1 year ago
this got an acceptable rating only because the brake pedal moved towards the driver alot
Aragon159 4 years ago
Plastic bumpers ain't gettin it
toyotas2006 4 years ago
oh i really love ford vehicles. the old ones are really the best. ford escape is my dream car,...^^,
Screws18 4 years ago 17
This comment has received too many negative votes show
you trippin nigga ?
hypersupermamado 4 years ago
excuse me. but i dont get what you are saying. you're wasting my time. sorry.
Screws18 4 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
ford sucks
hypersupermamado 4 years ago
just as much as you do
superextramegagiga 4 years ago
besides you seem like a tad retard!
hypersupermamado 4 years ago
whatever, stupid freak. i am entitled to my own opinions.
Screws18 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
you are a complete DUMBASS!
YOU MUST HAVE DOWN SINDROME SO BAD YOU ALSO GOT UP,LEFT AND RIGHT SINDROME TOO.
ford sucks you STUPID SCUMBAG!
hypersupermamado 4 years ago
whatever,...
Screws18 4 years ago
Big improvement over the previous gen
alexkvaskov 4 years ago
damn my matrix fared better in a 40 mph head on collision in icy conditions
askme221 4 years ago
buy the pilot
dialjake851 4 years ago
pilot is midsize not small
viktord1 4 years ago
so it 40 MPH... I wounder what it would be at 65 MPH?
Jaydeeman20 4 years ago
Hmmmm, well the engine might be on your lap lol
firedemon101 4 years ago
This is a 40MPH test, that's hitting a vehicle the same weight, size, and mass at 0 MPH. Very few collisions are at 0 MPH. 95% are on the freeway.
RangerMH 4 years ago
thats not a real statistic and you know it
dtigers07 4 years ago
pretty good for a small suv.
SteelCity1981 4 years ago
Ford's are shit. So, for that matter, are GM. They've both been churning out rubbish, poor quality, soulless, dull cars for years. Small wonder then that they are both in such financial dire straits.
haegerman 4 years ago
People like you live in the past. The Ford Escape was one of the best compace Suv when it came out. You probably think that Japenese cars are the best in the whole wide world. Wake up this is 2007 time to step in the future
jsmilesrmhs 4 years ago
No, European cars ARE the best. Specifically from Germany and Sweden. Granted, American cars aren't as bad as Chinese, but that really doesn't say much. Case closed.
haegerman 4 years ago 3
be the first to step into the future then
you must be the one living in the past
alexkvaskov 4 years ago
lol ur just dissing ur country.. everything that is american is shit ... just like you
99caca99 4 years ago
wake up man...Ford did better than Toyota recently...Its 2007...Fords are one of the ebst card ont he market...they have only been around for what? 104 years?
Doubledee90 4 years ago
Ford best cars on the market ? Are you fuckin dreaming ? Omg...
maxou5757 4 years ago
not dreaming hes trippin!
hypersupermamado 4 years ago
I think it's hilarious that everyone is ripping the piss out of exBMRguy... Look at the clip, I dunno about you but I wouldn't wanna be in that car! Sure, the Pontiac may be WORSE but BMR wasn't making a comparison, he was just saying the car was poorly built. As for the welfare recipients part, perhaps it was over the top, but I think his point was the cars are built on a budget to keep costs down and appeal to a wider market. Stop taking things to literally, stanbernadino and jessiejenn!
bobbert2006 4 years ago
it did good, improved over the crap ones back then. the f-150 was an example
carjacker1 4 years ago
oh really exBMRguy? What do you drive? Toyota echo? Loser, Ill have you know i probably make more in a week then you do in a month, so screw you and your welfare comment, you probaly are just so pissed that YOU CANT AFFORD SOMETHING NICE ,and like i said i bet you drive a echo or better yet.. a dodge neon LOSER!!Ford DOES rank high up there!! where you get your info?
jessiejenn 4 years ago
To say Ford is built for 'welfare recipients' is an arrogant and a dumb statement. I have a Ford which is a great car and I'm not a welfare recipient.
stanbernadino 4 years ago
ex is right!!
ford is SHITTTT
carfanPhil 4 years ago
Another poor quality Ford product built by those that build for welfare recepients. Ford has never ranked high on any realibility study. Stay away from this junk.
exBMRguy 4 years ago
you think thats bad look at the Pontiac Montana Trans Port
voyager1985 4 years ago
ex ur an idiot
laczkopeti 4 years ago
Agreed. This is nothing compared to the Pontiac!
johnstond 4 years ago
I don't see how you can say that. The most important thing for crash test ratings is passenger compartment intrusion. There is little if no intrusion as a result of this test.
r00tdenied 4 years ago
ex ur an idiot... why dont u go and drive a montana... =)
ford1011 4 years ago