Department Store Controlled Demolition

[stavy75]

also I think the structure had the main steels on the outside face with the floors bracing them to the elevator core so would be even more conspicuos if there was work going on before the incident

[enterthafatass]

9/11 SOUNDED NOTHING LIKE THAT. The sounds of explosions were actually peoples bodies imploding on the ground. Go ahead and watch. They sound like bags of concrete exploding.

[poosaypirate]

as long as people are happy to destroy history and replace everything with wall mart and burger king

now wonder the place looks like shit you dont know how to preserve and restore

[tscharf75]

What did you HEAR? thats right - explosions, tons of them..

This should be listed as a debunking video because you see how much work needs to be done to take down a building that hasn't been significantly structurally weakened...

[bgiles26]

I was there on the day the old Hudson building fell. I was on the corner of Congress and Woodward and I remember when the smoke came, I went due west to avoid it. Everyone who were close to the building was hit with a massive smoke cloud.

[bjorinn]

Every controlled demolition does not necessary look the same.

Show me a building that has collapsed due to fire and structural damage at nearly free fall speed into its own footprint, then maybe I will believe that THREE buildings collapsed like that in ONE day.

But you won't be able to, because all of the observations (nearly free fall speed, symmetricly into its footprint, hot enormous dust clouds, etc) cannot be explained by "structural damage and fire". It simply violates laws of physics.

[ericd3]

"symmetricly (sic) into its footprint"

I'm sorry, that's just a ridiculous statement, bjorinn.

[Jaroon1]

Show me a building like wtc hit by airplanes......

[PureMetalDrummer15]

Because 9/11 wasn't a controlled demolition. Why? The place hitting the building causeing a huge explosion, Weakening the steel, Plus the fire burning from over 15,000 gallons of jet fuel for about an hour, further weakening the steel. Weakend to the point that the incredible weight from the top of the buildings couldn't support and then finally gave in on itself. Controlled demolitions, and the WTC collapses are completely different.

[aSASa45454]

Wrong, wrong wrong. And for a quick FYI, if it was all that easy, there wouldnt be 2 conspiracies. And also worthy of noting is that there was a mere 11x11x10 foot pool of fuel that burnt off in under 10 minutes. The remaining 50 were cool, 600-800F office fires.

[ericd3]

With brains like yours, we should put you in a cool, 600-800F office fire before you breed, Assass45. :-)

[Maymona13]

How come there are people comparing this vid to the 9/11 attacks. Look at the 9/11 vids. The buildings fell starting at the top. No Controlled demolishion I have ever seen starts imploding a building like that.

[aSASa45454]

There are plenty that occur top down.

[ericd3]

show a video that supports your statement.

[daantjede12e]

The birds almost got hit.

[priestpilot]

Well whenever something big happens, some person needing attention will make any claims to attempt to steer away from what is obvious. It's like the sinking of the Titanic. Some people claim that it was actually its sister ship Olympic that sank. You don't see these things in normal situations, but oh as soon as something bad happens, it must be different!

[MrBoredatwork]

Thats about as rational as you can put it. I would build on that and say that people cant understand that sometimes very complex events have very simple causes so they have to develop very crazy and complex causes to match the event.

[AGDemo]

Thanks Wal Mart!!.........Made In China ....Out With the Old In With The New!

[hudson501]

Bear in mind that in the early 1900's it was J.L. Hudson who put up the most money to help create a flegling automobile company that would bear his name, the Hudson Motor Car Co.. In 1954 Hudson would merge with Nash Motors leading to the American Motors Corp. (AMC) that built all those Ramblers, Gremlins, Hornets, and Javelins!

[mgsfan15]

Totally different.

[farlane]

Hey there - featuring this on Michigan in Pictures today along with more stuff about the demolition - great video but I bet you got a facefull of dust!!

[69salford69]

"Why believe a bunch of lies, when you can do the research and find the truth?"

- So we are told Iraq has WMD's ready to launch in 45minutes, but when we do research we find there are NONE?

- We are told "Bin Laden did it", but when we research we find it was done by a team of Saudi Arabians?

- We are told Afganistan funded 9/11, but we research and find Pakistan funded it.

What do you expect from people? You want us to trust those who planned Operation Northwoods and AUS Sarin Test?

[ericd3]

Correct, 69salford69, however, this video isn't about WMDs, Bin Ladan, or Pakistan, it's about documenting what controlled demolition looks like and sounds like... because some idiots think that 9/11 was CD, and it's fairly obvious that it wasn't.

[69salford69]

Yes those idiots are misinformation specialists.

They are the same as those who say "there was no plane!!"

[Frasure3000]

lol. god bless america.

[smartestinUSA]

do you know if the building was damaged by its demolition. you keep that information hidden from everyone leaveing millions in mistery

[BitterCycle]

The wtc towers actually collapsed in an average of 14 seconds or so. First the urban legend was 10 seconds, now lately I'm hearing 8 seconds. Libs, and radicals rewrite history faster these days I see. Next they will claim that lincoln could fly.

[AnthraxByEmail]

why would liberals try to blame the government for 9/11? those 9/11 truthers hate the government...liberal advocate more government control.

[CALICOTV301]

It's logic.

What else can you not blame the government for?

They also allow guns, abortion, war, deer hunting and so forth, what the difference in killing 1000+ people in the WTC and 100000s in war?

[Frasure3000]

ahem.....what you said shows how dumb liberals are and how idiotic it was of liberals to vote for obama. i guarantee you 80 percent of the conspiracists voted for obama.......they are dumb because they say they hate government yet they voted for a guy who will regulate everything and tax everything. a guy who will make government more powerful. this is why liberals are dumb. because they don't think clearly.

[aSASa45454]

Really? Now you call nearly all of Americans dumb. [ All who voted for Obama, and the 30%+ of American's who believe that we don't know everything about 9-11 ]

[poosaypirate]

you live there you would knwo retard

[kelaEQ2]

Actually they hate Bush, not the Government, otherwise they wouldn't be calling for his arrest they would be calling for his head.

[DurhamGuns]

Whew, so tragic. I love neo-classical architecture, and it's a shame to see America's early skyscrapers (envied all over the world) destroyed. Especially so when everyhting they put up these days looks like it belongs in downtown Dallas, whether it be Shanghai or Tampa or San Francisco or Pheonix.

[geargemartin]

excellent video and synopsis.

[akamarujump11]

wow that as so cool.☺

[cycloneGT7000]

dowtown detroit,destroit

[backupcoolm3n]

couldnt have written the description any better 911 was a day of mourning and some choose to believe such grief could be caused by our government, look at the facts life is a bitch and we lost 4000 lives due to the heartless souls of 20 something muslims, and 2 of americas largest landmarks are now gone

[jhn128]

Such a big building!! wow! Why was it torn down?

[ZacharyWDS17]

It was old and structurally unstable past the point of repair, so the property it sat on was auctioned off. the new owner had no use for it, so he ordered it to be disposed of.

[TheRealmsOfGold]

Really good camera angle. This is the store in Detroit, no? Sad to see it go.

[Natashathompson]

Typical CD implosion FROM THE BOTTOM. This is what a controlled demo looks like. The BOTTOM shatters and the rest falls into the base.

The WTC Towers POWDERED from the TOP DOWN. Two DISTINCTLY DIFFERENT events that look NOTHING alike.

/watch?v=8U4erFzhC-U

[Aaron518]

Not to mention that every video of a shorter wider building you see destroyed by CD is imploded from one side and moves toward the other.With WTC 7 you see it buckle in the middle and fall,which is consistent with what you would expect to see due to the big gash in the middle of it from the first WTC towers falling into it,and not what you see in CD videos.

[Tihbialdunav]

A steel-frame concrete 100 storey bulding doesn't evaporate in 8 seconds. A piece of paper burns slower. Concrete doesn't get pulverized unless heavy duty bombs are used. Steel doesn't melt unless there is thermite-all present in CDs. Govmt fiction defies any scientific data.

[ericd3]

>100 storey bldg doesn't evaporate in 8 seconds... correct, it fell in 15 and there was thousands of tons of debris.

>concrete ... unless heavy duty bombs are used... wrong, you can pulverize concrete with more concrete.

>steel doesn't melt... wrong, you can melt steel w/o thermite, but it doesn't matter, the steel didn't melt, it just softened enough to fail.

>govmt fiction defies scientific data... wrong again, tihbiadunav. Just because you don't agree with it doesn't mean it's wrong.

[mike4ty4]

"A steel-frame concrete 100 storey bulding doesn't evaporate in 8 seconds. A piece of paper burns slower."

They didn't "evaporate" they collapsed. If they "evaporated" the pressure of the expanding gas would have annihilated Manhattan Island completely like a nuclear weapon going off.

[mike4ty4]

"A steel-frame concrete 100 storey bulding doesn't evaporate in 8 seconds."

That's right, and none ever has, ever. The WTC towers didn't "evaporate" they just collapsed.

[Frasure3000]

thermite was naturally produced in the wtc due to the conditions. it wasn't planted - it was naturally produced. this is basic science. this debunks the thermite theorists.

[aSASa45454]

No, thermite isn't naturally occuring.

[ericd3]

Well, neither is steel, dumbass.

[Tihbialdunav]

No, they blew the subbasement first. Ask the people who worked in the building. First they heard a bomb downstairs, and MINUTES later the plane crashed into the building. Witnesses spoke of numerous explosions, not related to the plane crash.

[NotoriousPimp24]

Please explain. Who are your "witnessess" and "people that worked in the building"? Fucking 'tard. Making up your facts as you go.

[ZacharyWDS17]

When the plane hit it knocked tons of internal joints out of place, which popped and groaned as the building burned and eventually fell. The reporters didnt know what this was, so they said they were hearing secondary explosions. Unfortuneately CT's use this to say there were bombs in the buildings.

[Frasure3000]

also, people inside the building heard the steel beams literally moan and groan.

[aSASa45454]

Really? Did they? Too bad. It's not recorded. You know what is recorded? People saying they hear explosives. People saying they see molten steel [impossible from normal fires].

[ericd3]

People are recorded saying they saw unmarked government planes, too. Basically people hear things breaking and think it's explosions because they've never heard anything like it before. Because they're smart like you.

[aSASa45454]

Name something else that may be happening in the building that would burn people and have them say they heard and felt explosions?

[ericd3]

aSSAS: something else that would burn people and sound like explosions? How about large parts of the offices upstairs, covered in jet fuel, on fire, falling 60+ stories?

[Flexfuel306]

Only problem with your logic here is that not only did people see molten steel, they found it. Again, not possible from the fire itself.

The inside WTC job > you.

[ericd3]

@Flexfuel306 So, not really sure what your point is. Something about molten steel that you found. Or you didn't find. Or somebody else found and told you about. Or didn't actually tell you about. Or you read it on a website... which means it has to be true!

[TheFerruccio]

Here's where the real fun begins. Prove to me, irrefutably, that the videos are fake.

For instance: showing that the towers are still standing would prove them to be fake. You're making quite an extreme claim. Even a majority of conspiracy theorists think the videos are real. You are really out on a limb here!

[oakheadfootball]

You mean fake, like someone posing as a 16 year old thong girl? That is what you do "bsregistration".

[PtH888999]

yep, 3000 people really didnt die. the people in the plane are still alive. the towers are still up. there are no witnesses.

[SYLVESTER1592]

Nope, it doesn't look the same as WTC.

Here you see the lower part sag down first pulling the res down with it. The WTC 1/2 can be seen to collapse from the top down. I'm the first one to even bother on commenting after a month, but I guess every effort deserves some credit.