Not a liberal, but why would I want to use Glenn Beck's book to debate someone. His form of thinking is illogical all by itself. Frankly, he's an insult to my intelligence.
Faced with stonewalling or overwhelming hate and bile, most give up trying to get anything done or defend themelves against nation-wrecker Liberal-Leftists.
But the mind-police idea just covers the moral bankruptcy beneath. Become impervious to the hysteria and confound them with facts and reason.
Online boards are good place to start and taking on the lickspittles can actually be fun. Click my name to view DEBATING AND EXPOSING LIBERALS NOW MORE IMPORTANT THAN EVER (SPEECH).
@DonaldBumsfeld What irony? All I see is greatly written book make by a comical man who knows how to read. . . .something liberals dare not even mention since they can't even read the constitution or the bills they try to pass.
Well by god, lets get this man a time machine! Just... have him accidentally get hit with lightning, sending him to 1885 and with not enough plutonium to come back to 1985.
if you waste your hard earned money during a recession on this idiots book (vehicle to make even more money off of the gullible), you might be a redneck.
i have no desire to read it. there is no point. i have seen and heard enough of his foolishness, why would i spend my money just to patronize the dolt? that would be like a raving neo-conservative extremist paying good money to see "capitalism: a love story".
you know, i always found that movie quite ironic. here's michael moore, being pissed off at capitalism, and saying how everybody who wants a profit is greedy and evil, and yet, he's making a movie, and trying to make a profit out of it.
i don't see how it can be abused. unlike socialism, there are many different companies to provide services for you. don't like one, then go to another. nobody's forcing you to go to a specific company to get anything. if you don't like a company, don't go there. that's capitalism.
yeah, and the only monopoly right now is the government. socialism has more government. therefore, socialism = monopoly.
that's, of course, assuming you're a socialist like moore.
also, right now, monopolies are illegal. therefore, if one company is super huge, then it's not because people are forced to go there, it's because people want to go there.
i'm chinese. many jobs are being shipped to china, so i'm not to worried. even if I were white, well, if the economy's good, i still have a better chance at finding a decent job than under socialism. that's why america still has the best economy and the highest employment rate in the world right now. places like france (which is very socialist) have huge unemployment rates, even in "good" economy. yes, even if my job is shipped to thailand or china, i still have a better chance at finding a new
Really Well I lived in Canada for a yr and its not as bad as your right wing friends exaggerate. Sadly you've never set foot outside the US to notice since you listen to cowboys.
i've been to canada, and true, it's a nice place. still, america's not as bad as your left wing friends are exaggerating. fact is, america STILL has the world's best economy. and that's all done by capitalism.
that's true, but capitalism is the best system thus far. every attempt at finding a better one has failed miserably (soviet union, communist china, nazi germany etc.) hell, even canada is capitalist. yes, you guys have a much bigger governement than america, but you still adhere to the basics of capitalism, which is private ownership, profits etc.
don't mistaken me, though. i wholeheartedly agree that capitalism is also abusable (monopolies for instance). even then, it's still the best system
What I want is to take the power of govt. from the corporations and back to the people. thats what the basic principle of liberalism, But instead of looking at them individually why don't we mix all of them together to create some kind of Hybrid system, Just like they have in Canada, France, Spain, and Even Japan they still use the basics of capitalism like you mentioned. I mean it can be possible.
actually, it has already been done in the U.S. our markets aren't the freest (is that a word?), but it IS the most competitive, which is what makes capitalism so great. we discourage things that are against competition (such as monopolies), and the people benefit the most from this aspect. because of all these companies working to get your business, the companies will compete for low prices and higher quality, thus allowing the people to win. in america, no one is forced to go to any gov't or
corporate place to buy stuff. they go there under their own will, probably because that specific store offered them the best deal. any corporation that does not listen to the customer (which is the people) will fail. in american capitalism, if your company does not innovate, your company will die, guarenteed. that's the beauty of capitalism. socialism removes all of the good things. because your punished for your hard work via super taxes, it's often more attractive not to work than work, which
is very dangerous for a country. end result: everyone's poor, except the government. that's what happened with china and the soviet union, and those are experiences that i would rather not repeat. so long as the market remains competitive (which is why we still need to gov't to be a referee), americans will continue to enjoy the highest standard of living in the world.
true, republicans also have their bad apples. even this book explains how there are idiots in every party.
illegal in the U.S. hell, look at microsoft. they control probably 90% of the entire home computer market. why aren't they being super inefficient and cheap? because they know that if they do that, apple's gonna rip 'em to pieces (microsoft does not have a monopoly). in fact, the only monopoly that exists in the U.S is the government (name me one thing that competes with the gov't), which is why i want it to be as small as possible.
they are one of the biggest banks, along with all the others. no one is forced to go to that bank (the fact that i never heard of it until now is a pretty good example), so if they're super huge, then it's because people want to go there. if one doesn't like that bank, they can go to another bank. that's capitalism. if there's another place to go, then that specific company is not a monopoly.
Honestly our system now is still very competitive marketing wise, however products very rarely are completely innovative anymore. It seems to me we hit a point in time in the world where our entertainment value precedes anything else. For example Beck a person with no formal collage education, from my understanding, can have a show that is him essentially screaming we are all going to die and people take it as fact.
actually, we are still the most innovative (innovation is the key to capitalism, and our economy is still the best in the world). however, you are right, entertainment does seem to precede anything else. well, that's mostly the fault of liberals (they practically run the entertainment industry).
Well it would depend on what you classify as liberal. You see my point was directed at news today and how it seems to be red vs. blue type stuff.
How could it be we have all this technology and have people like Palin possibly get elected.
NO we are not innovated any more; we just have an amazing marketing team. The only innovation coming from the US is our drugs, that really it. Oh btw I am a liberal so please look up what a liberal is before you go bashing it.
yes, i agree with you when you say that marketing has more to do with the actual product, but i disagree with you on lack of innovation. despite what some say, we are STILL the world's leading economy, and a leading economy, by definition, should have good innovation.
don't get the feeling that i dislike liberals. while i dislike some (okay, most) of them, many of my friends are liberals. it just depends on how you are. for instance, you didn't yell at me and call me an idiot. that i like.
Name one thing that we make here that is innovative. Innovation died when marketing came along.
Again you should really look up what a liberal is before you say they cause anything. Like in some respects Abraham Lincoln was a liberal.
Also we are headed for another depression so I dont see how we have the strongest markets. I do agree however we have a lot of buying and selling power.
By that if it lands in the hands of someone with evil deeds. So what Yeah I am a liberal and a progressive but it still hold some conservative values. Its true I went to govt. public schools, But I was probably the good student, I pass all my classes, never did drugs, got a girl pregnant. but i believe that whether your progressinve,Liberal, Conservative, socialist or whatever. Why can't bring these ideologies together and to fix problems.
it would be nice if all those opinions would work together, but the last time the US tried going bipartisan, it was bush (he worked with democrats on a bunch of stuff). what did he get in return? liberals are critisizing bush on everything, despite the fact that he tried to reach out to them. similar things happened with clinton (though, not on that big of a scale).
would be nice, but the gov't only cares about its own party, which is why i'm republican (small gov't controls your life less).
imo, FDR was only a great president because he led america quite well in WW2. what most liberals don't want you to know is that the new deal failed miserably, and actually made the depression last longer than usual. WW2 got us out after demand for goods went up considerably when the war started. so yes, FDR wasn't a good president for the New Deal. He was a pretty good president for getting rid of hitler and going to war, which is something peace loving liberals seem to hate.
ya he would know how to do that
W3Ar3Th3P3ople 6 months ago
Great book
basilone200 1 year ago
Not a liberal, but why would I want to use Glenn Beck's book to debate someone. His form of thinking is illogical all by itself. Frankly, he's an insult to my intelligence.
keng612 1 year ago
Faced with stonewalling or overwhelming hate and bile, most give up trying to get anything done or defend themelves against nation-wrecker Liberal-Leftists.
But the mind-police idea just covers the moral bankruptcy beneath. Become impervious to the hysteria and confound them with facts and reason.
Online boards are good place to start and taking on the lickspittles can actually be fun. Click my name to view DEBATING AND EXPOSING LIBERALS NOW MORE IMPORTANT THAN EVER (SPEECH).
TheDustpile 1 year ago
Yeah. His name is Glenn Beck. And he's an asshole.
Captainoldspice 1 year ago
@Captainoldspice and you suck!
glennbeckgirl 11 months ago
@glennbeckgirl
Troll harder, bro.
Captainoldspice 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Obama listed his religion as Islam on his school records in Indonesia.
w w w.snopes. c o m/politics/graphics/soetoro2.jpg
intrepidorator 1 year ago
Btw Freaking love this book!
SavageCrnbread 1 year ago
LOL that guy sounds like whatthebuck.
SavageCrnbread 1 year ago
the obama deception is # 1 on u tub
galegregory97comcast 1 year ago
i pity anybody who takes glenn beck seriously...
jsbebop 1 year ago
@jsbebop I pity every liberal. Take away the conservatives and they would all die of starvation.
copycat33633 1 year ago
@copycat33633
Conservatives. Take away the liberals and they're back to working 17 hour shifts for Carnegie and living in rat infested tenements.
Captainoldspice 11 months ago
@jsbebop
Indeed. Beck is a fucking idiot.
Captainoldspice 1 year ago
fuck obama, shit president
mysoulhaunts 1 year ago
The studies show that the more intelligent and educated people are the more liberal they get.... now that's a fact.
buddhika216 1 year ago
@buddhika216 Funny. I became more conservative. Way more conservative.
MichelleLovesHayat 1 year ago
I don't like glenn but I have to sat this ad is acutually prty rad.. but fdr was an amazing president!
crack01010101 1 year ago
@crack01010101 Then you are a nazi socialist communist progressive stalinlist.
according to Glenny
Seargent363 1 year ago
Oh Glen Beck
if only you could see the sweet irony of your own book
DonaldBumsfeld 2 years ago
@DonaldBumsfeld What irony? All I see is greatly written book make by a comical man who knows how to read. . . .something liberals dare not even mention since they can't even read the constitution or the bills they try to pass.
Scotish223332 1 year ago
@Scotish223332
sure Beck is a comical man all right
The guy's a fucking joke!
DonaldBumsfeld 1 year ago
@DonaldBumsfeld If Glenn is the joke then Obama must be a comedy central. . .the pinnacle of stupidity of all television :3
Scotish223332 1 year ago
@Scotish223332 of course Obama is a joke.. he is a politician they are all jokes
if you are looking for the pinnacle of stupidity then I think you have to look to Obama's predecessor for that title
DonaldBumsfeld 1 year ago
@DonaldBumsfeld Vice president who? lulz :3
I'm guessing your a neutral person, am I right?
Scotish223332 1 year ago
What the fuck costume does he think he's wearing.
willivanilli07 2 years ago
Well nobama has all of his czars so glenn beck is now the book czar.
693batman 2 years ago
well obviously he is wearing the costume that shows his ideas and the country and time he would have liked to live
Melpheos1er 2 years ago
Well by god, lets get this man a time machine! Just... have him accidentally get hit with lightning, sending him to 1885 and with not enough plutonium to come back to 1985.
willivanilli07 2 years ago
Glenn Beck: Queen of the Teabaggers!
Two years ago Beck was still crowing about the Bush Boom and pimping Bush's idiotic invasion of Iraq.
AtlasShruggery 2 years ago
thank god for obama's double digit unemployment rate
dcarman123 2 years ago
Do you like it better than Reagan's double digit unemployment rate?
AtlasShruggery 2 years ago
Oh i watched and ill tell and his show was a load of shit I mean where did they get this guy The sears catalouge.
chrisfo19 2 years ago
I must read this book! I simply cannot think for myself in an argument and must cite other peoples opinion!!!
skynug 2 years ago
No thanks but I'm not going to buy a pro-government book from that liberal asshole Glenn Beck.
soakchips 2 years ago
bravo :)
DoodiePunk 2 years ago
if you waste your hard earned money during a recession on this idiots book (vehicle to make even more money off of the gullible), you might be a redneck.
lindberghg 2 years ago
Have you even read it.
TheMadOrc 2 years ago
i have no desire to read it. there is no point. i have seen and heard enough of his foolishness, why would i spend my money just to patronize the dolt? that would be like a raving neo-conservative extremist paying good money to see "capitalism: a love story".
lindberghg 2 years ago
you know, i always found that movie quite ironic. here's michael moore, being pissed off at capitalism, and saying how everybody who wants a profit is greedy and evil, and yet, he's making a movie, and trying to make a profit out of it.
hypocrite much?
gameragodzilla 2 years ago
He doesn't He just like me hates how its been abused.
chrisfo19 2 years ago
i don't see how it can be abused. unlike socialism, there are many different companies to provide services for you. don't like one, then go to another. nobody's forcing you to go to a specific company to get anything. if you don't like a company, don't go there. that's capitalism.
gameragodzilla 2 years ago
I don't think you get it but thats not how it is anymore. How long have you benn asleep 1955. But its something called Monopolies.
chrisfo19 2 years ago
yeah, and the only monopoly right now is the government. socialism has more government. therefore, socialism = monopoly.
that's, of course, assuming you're a socialist like moore.
also, right now, monopolies are illegal. therefore, if one company is super huge, then it's not because people are forced to go there, it's because people want to go there.
gameragodzilla 2 years ago
Well how smug you are about Capitalism when your job is shipped to Thailand.
chrisfo19 2 years ago
i'm chinese. many jobs are being shipped to china, so i'm not to worried. even if I were white, well, if the economy's good, i still have a better chance at finding a decent job than under socialism. that's why america still has the best economy and the highest employment rate in the world right now. places like france (which is very socialist) have huge unemployment rates, even in "good" economy. yes, even if my job is shipped to thailand or china, i still have a better chance at finding a new
gameragodzilla 2 years ago
job in the U.S.A instead of a socialist country like France.
another factor that causes lower amounts of american jobs is illegal immigrants, and you guys consistantly support letting the immigrants sneak in.
gameragodzilla 2 years ago
Really Well I lived in Canada for a yr and its not as bad as your right wing friends exaggerate. Sadly you've never set foot outside the US to notice since you listen to cowboys.
chrisfo19 2 years ago
i've been to canada, and true, it's a nice place. still, america's not as bad as your left wing friends are exaggerating. fact is, america STILL has the world's best economy. and that's all done by capitalism.
gameragodzilla 2 years ago
I know it isn't But you guys still like to think capitalism is perfect but it isn't. It can be abused just as anyother system.
chrisfo19 2 years ago
that's true, but capitalism is the best system thus far. every attempt at finding a better one has failed miserably (soviet union, communist china, nazi germany etc.) hell, even canada is capitalist. yes, you guys have a much bigger governement than america, but you still adhere to the basics of capitalism, which is private ownership, profits etc.
don't mistaken me, though. i wholeheartedly agree that capitalism is also abusable (monopolies for instance). even then, it's still the best system
gameragodzilla 2 years ago
What I want is to take the power of govt. from the corporations and back to the people. thats what the basic principle of liberalism, But instead of looking at them individually why don't we mix all of them together to create some kind of Hybrid system, Just like they have in Canada, France, Spain, and Even Japan they still use the basics of capitalism like you mentioned. I mean it can be possible.
chrisfo19 2 years ago
actually, it has already been done in the U.S. our markets aren't the freest (is that a word?), but it IS the most competitive, which is what makes capitalism so great. we discourage things that are against competition (such as monopolies), and the people benefit the most from this aspect. because of all these companies working to get your business, the companies will compete for low prices and higher quality, thus allowing the people to win. in america, no one is forced to go to any gov't or
gameragodzilla 2 years ago
True its isn't we are a command economy. But tell that to all the companies that have been merging to form monopolies.
chrisfo19 2 years ago
corporate place to buy stuff. they go there under their own will, probably because that specific store offered them the best deal. any corporation that does not listen to the customer (which is the people) will fail. in american capitalism, if your company does not innovate, your company will die, guarenteed. that's the beauty of capitalism. socialism removes all of the good things. because your punished for your hard work via super taxes, it's often more attractive not to work than work, which
gameragodzilla 2 years ago
is very dangerous for a country. end result: everyone's poor, except the government. that's what happened with china and the soviet union, and those are experiences that i would rather not repeat. so long as the market remains competitive (which is why we still need to gov't to be a referee), americans will continue to enjoy the highest standard of living in the world.
true, republicans also have their bad apples. even this book explains how there are idiots in every party.
monopolies are
gameragodzilla 2 years ago
illegal in the U.S. hell, look at microsoft. they control probably 90% of the entire home computer market. why aren't they being super inefficient and cheap? because they know that if they do that, apple's gonna rip 'em to pieces (microsoft does not have a monopoly). in fact, the only monopoly that exists in the U.S is the government (name me one thing that competes with the gov't), which is why i want it to be as small as possible.
gameragodzilla 2 years ago
I meant Wacovia-Wells Fargo for example.
chrisfo19 2 years ago
they are one of the biggest banks, along with all the others. no one is forced to go to that bank (the fact that i never heard of it until now is a pretty good example), so if they're super huge, then it's because people want to go there. if one doesn't like that bank, they can go to another bank. that's capitalism. if there's another place to go, then that specific company is not a monopoly.
gameragodzilla 2 years ago
No I meant by themselves.
chrisfo19 2 years ago
@gameragodzilla
Honestly our system now is still very competitive marketing wise, however products very rarely are completely innovative anymore. It seems to me we hit a point in time in the world where our entertainment value precedes anything else. For example Beck a person with no formal collage education, from my understanding, can have a show that is him essentially screaming we are all going to die and people take it as fact.
SuperMELO4ever 2 years ago
actually, we are still the most innovative (innovation is the key to capitalism, and our economy is still the best in the world). however, you are right, entertainment does seem to precede anything else. well, that's mostly the fault of liberals (they practically run the entertainment industry).
gameragodzilla 2 years ago
@gameragodzilla
Well it would depend on what you classify as liberal. You see my point was directed at news today and how it seems to be red vs. blue type stuff.
How could it be we have all this technology and have people like Palin possibly get elected.
NO we are not innovated any more; we just have an amazing marketing team. The only innovation coming from the US is our drugs, that really it. Oh btw I am a liberal so please look up what a liberal is before you go bashing it.
SuperMELO4ever 2 years ago
yes, i agree with you when you say that marketing has more to do with the actual product, but i disagree with you on lack of innovation. despite what some say, we are STILL the world's leading economy, and a leading economy, by definition, should have good innovation.
don't get the feeling that i dislike liberals. while i dislike some (okay, most) of them, many of my friends are liberals. it just depends on how you are. for instance, you didn't yell at me and call me an idiot. that i like.
gameragodzilla 2 years ago
@gameragodzilla
Name one thing that we make here that is innovative. Innovation died when marketing came along.
Again you should really look up what a liberal is before you say they cause anything. Like in some respects Abraham Lincoln was a liberal.
Also we are headed for another depression so I dont see how we have the strongest markets. I do agree however we have a lot of buying and selling power.
SuperMELO4ever 2 years ago
By that if it lands in the hands of someone with evil deeds. So what Yeah I am a liberal and a progressive but it still hold some conservative values. Its true I went to govt. public schools, But I was probably the good student, I pass all my classes, never did drugs, got a girl pregnant. but i believe that whether your progressinve,Liberal, Conservative, socialist or whatever. Why can't bring these ideologies together and to fix problems.
chrisfo19 2 years ago
it would be nice if all those opinions would work together, but the last time the US tried going bipartisan, it was bush (he worked with democrats on a bunch of stuff). what did he get in return? liberals are critisizing bush on everything, despite the fact that he tried to reach out to them. similar things happened with clinton (though, not on that big of a scale).
would be nice, but the gov't only cares about its own party, which is why i'm republican (small gov't controls your life less).
gameragodzilla 2 years ago
But even the Republican party has had its bad apples.
chrisfo19 2 years ago
You should educate your self before commenting.
TheMadOrc 2 years ago
I have and its stupid it should be called Bible for Right wing Losers more like it.
chrisfo19 2 years ago
Did you bother to read the book?
TheMadOrc 2 years ago
Yes and what a load of crap it was. Thats my opinion get over I don't follow the tradtion of "convert or Die".
chrisfo19 2 years ago
Toilet paper has more appeal.
eelzen 2 years ago
i want one
twilighthater 2 years ago
A damn fine read. Five stars. Brilliant book. Best book I've read in years. Liberals will hate it though, no pictures or pop ups to play with.
LordAtrocities 2 years ago
absolutly!! it will no doubt be essential reading in every trailer park in america.
lindberghg 2 years ago
Well better trailer parks than hybrids.
LordAtrocities 2 years ago
that's beautiful!! a brilliant piece of reasoning!! let's here more! do you own a rush runs america tshirt too?
lindberghg 2 years ago
No, but I have one that reads "Obama Owns AmeriKa T-shirt."
LordAtrocities 2 years ago
than your a redneck.
chrisfo19 2 years ago
@chrisfo19, then I guess you are a tree hugging, prius driving, Berkley raised, American hating, go green, socialist with pseudo fascist tendencies.
LordAtrocities 2 years ago
FDR was a great president. OMG these conservatives are starting to show themselves as nazis.
lordblazer 2 years ago
imo, FDR was only a great president because he led america quite well in WW2. what most liberals don't want you to know is that the new deal failed miserably, and actually made the depression last longer than usual. WW2 got us out after demand for goods went up considerably when the war started. so yes, FDR wasn't a good president for the New Deal. He was a pretty good president for getting rid of hitler and going to war, which is something peace loving liberals seem to hate.
gameragodzilla 2 years ago
WWII is the only thing he did right.
TheMadOrc 2 years ago
LOL! your right!
gameragodzilla 2 years ago