Added: 2 months ago
From: CBS
Views: 301
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (34)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • This is what this country needs. And as far as some of those Judges go.... I think some of them should be called in front of Congress on national TV, and explain to the country why they make some of the decisions they do. As with anyone, if you are called to testify in front of Congress, and you ignore them, they WILL ARREST YOU.

    You'd be amazed at how fast these moronic Anti-American judicial decisions will stop, when the Judges finally have to answer to the public for their actions.

  • @PatriotCondor Newt wants to call judges out, well he also wants to extend the most treasonous bill ever past called the patriot act, so while he's at it he should plan an arresting himself, politicians need to be held accountable when they ignore the Constitution

  • @stavie03 Actually, under wartime conditions, even when war has not been officially declared, the President does have executive authority to conduct military operations, to which may have affect on foreign adversaries who live outside our Constitutional Republic. There is nothing in the Patriot Act that has been found unconstitutional, even after being fully read and interpretted by the overwhelming majority of Judges and Lawyers in this country. Many who are quite liberal.

  • @PatriotCondor We aren't under any wartime conditions because war hasn't been declared, that phrase has been tossed around a little too loosely. According to that logic a president could always declare such things due to the fact we are constantly policing the world. The patriot act took quite a big shit on the Bill of rights and that right there is unconstitutional. You are a complete nut if you think the Patriot act is legal. Something is really wrong with you

  • @stavie04 Um... yes, it is legal. Primarily, because Congress made it LAW!!!

    And I did not say we declared war. I said, even when war HAS NOT BEEN DECLARED!!! You need to pay attention. Yes, the President has executive military authority to engage enemy combatants without a formal declaration. This Patriot Act has already been thrown at the courts and numerous analysts for the last decade, and everyone with a brain stem bigger than a pipe cleaner has said it is constitutional.

  • @PatriotCondor I did pay attention and I told you that's a bunch of bull. The Patriot act is direct violation of the constitution and our rights as U.S citizens, it gives the government the power for illegal searches and seizures, the power to detain you indefinitely, the right to take away free speech, it gives the fbi power to write its own search warrants without a Judge, the right for them to install cameras in your house up to 18 months. Have you read the Constitution?

  • @stavie04 You keep forgetting, that when a civilian... even an American citizen.. takes up arms against its governemnt in attempt to subvert, damage, or overthrow its government (ie. terrorism) isn't just considered a criminal act. It is considered an act of war, by which such an act then goes outside the written federal laws of the United States, and the laws of war then apply. Thus, the President has executive authority to use military engagement, and tactics to stop such insurrective actions.

  • @PatriotCondor There have several civilians arrested who haven't attempted to overthrow the government or do any harm whatsoever who have been imprisoned due to sketchy laws in the Patriot act.

  • @PatriotCondor Furthermore the Constitution obviously didn't grant power to Congress to write laws in direct violation of itself therefore all in congress who voted for the Patriot act are traitors of the Country. THE CONSTITUTION IS THE CONSTITUTION IS THE CONSTITUTION, any law in direct opposition to was has been stated in the Constitution is in direct violation of the Constitution duh. Did you ever pay attention in history class as a child? its pretty cut and dry 

  • @stavie04 So... exactly what part of the Constitution is the Patriot directly in violation of?

    Seriously, read me word for word what is in violation. Don't just tell me about how you FEEL!!! I'm not concerned about how you feel. And, I don't want some garbage you read off some liberal pot smoking junk website with no Articles of the bill as direct reference, and absolute literal contradiciton and violation of the Constitution. I want an ABSOLUTE FACT!!!

    So... go ahead show me. YOU CAN'T!

  • @PatriotCondor I sent you the link in your email, its too much to post here and it has each amendment up next to the law in direct violation

  • @stavie04 Furthermore... when such acts are committed against ones own nation, and is enumerated or described accordingly in the Patriot, which does in fact list actions of terrorism that relates directly to the jihadist movement, the Constitutional rights afforded to such individuals may be suspended in order to enact procedures in accordance with the war powers act.

  • @PatriotCondor Such power creates corruption in the powers vested in our representatives. "Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety" Benjamin Franklin

    You still haven't given me a good argument as to why the Patriot act doesn't violate the Constitution.

  • @stavie04 As a result, it is entirely Constitutional.

  • @thomasjefferson6 The only no nothing is a moron like you. Washington lobbyists like Gingrich must love lackeys of the rich elite like you. So tell us all why we should vote for a corrupt lowlife scumbag like Gingrich. This should be great fun. I'm laughing in anticipation. I know your type. If you had your way you'd bring back slavery and make child prostitution legal end free speech and have a one party police state. It's also known as fascism.

  • It is obvious that there are a lot of You Tube commentators who never bother to read the Constitution. There is NOTHING in the Constitution that mandates judicial supremacy. The Constitution NOWHERE says that the Supreme Court has the final say on what the Constitution means. The Constitution NOWHERE states that the Supreme Court's interpretation of the Constitution is superior to that of the Congress or the President. Perhaps ignorant no-nothings like star50fy should read the Constitution.

  • @999Thip I love Tea Party nuts like you. You say you want to take back America well lets start with Washington Lobbyists like Gingrich who works for the rich elite and not the American people or the constitution. Gingrich is a corrupt scumbag who supports the "Patriot" Act and the bailout of private banks with taxpayer's money. The guy even took millions from Freddie Mac. Jesus H Christ have you no brains these guys hate freedom, Liberty, Justice and Democracy. You can't be this stupid.

  • What's more: Yes we have three equal branches of government. We do not have three interchangeable branches of government. The Executive can no more make or interpret law than the judicial can act as commander and chief of the military. Just because they're equal doesn't mean they aren't distinct.... Moron.

  • newt is a turd

    

  • Jefferson is rolling in his grave.

  • Just another word for fascism. Jail the judges that don't rule the way you like? What next.....come after any person that does something Republicans don't like? WAY OVER the line. Jail this fat ass for even suggesting it.

  • @decidedvoter08 clearly you are liberal..

    do you not know where our freedoms come from..

    NEWT 2012 WITH TEA PARTY PATRIOT SOPPORT.

    GOD BLESS AMERICA

  • ok as much as I hate newt, i gotta sort of agree with him on some points. for one, when the gov. say someone can not express their religion, it is the same as saying some has to express an established religion. As an atheist I fear the idea ofg the gov. monitoring what anyone has to say. And also I do believe that each part of the gov. should hold each other accountable. However newt reps the side which believes that freedom of religion, means the right to use the gov to enforce their morals.

  • What's more: The reason that the legislature is the go to branch is that the United States is not a government of rulers, it is a government of laws.

  • Pig shit.

  • Wait wait wait, Should we ignore federal judges who are out of touch with our "culture" or should we ignore federal judges who violate the law? what's more, that case where apparently the superintendent would go to jail for mentioning benediction is so rare and unusual I'm not sure it can be used as an example. The supreme court and higher courts have ruled against institutionalized prayer in public schools many times without the threat of jail time.

  • Newt wants to give drug users the death penalty.

  • @BRANSCOMBEx LIES LIES LIES.

    you liberals are a cancer to any nation..

    NEWT 2012

  • Yes something is wrong with the judicial system. You Newt are not in jail.

  • @star50ify OBUMMER SHOULD BE IMPEACHED AND JAILED.

    LOOK AT THE DAMAGE THIS TRAITOR HAS CAUSED..

    ITS TIME FOE A REAL CHANGE, JOIN YOUR LOCAL TEA PARTY PATRIOTS AND LETS TAKE BACK AMERICA., FROM THESE SOCIALIST, THESE KOOL AID DRINKING LIBERALS.

    GOD BLESS AMERICA

  • Gingrich is a fucking idiot

  • @babalooga12 THE ONLY IDIOTS ARE OBUMMER SUPPORTERS.

    AND LIBERALS LIKE YOU.

    BUT HAVE A GREAT DAY.

    REMEMBER TO CAST YOUR VOTE FOR THE TEA PARTY.

    GOD BLESS THE TEA PARTY

    AND GOD BLESS AMERICA

  • Something is wrong with you, as well, you pig.

  • ya somethings very wrong in the USA political system and this maggot is part of the problem

    Corporate sell outs lobyist who serve the interest of the elites like newt

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more