Added: 3 years ago
From: bassemmorris
Views: 271,287
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (84)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Looks Great i want to buy one for sure!! if you ever need any help give us a shout, were here to make the world a better place

  • Great wheel, Bassen! I would like to see this in action with the conversion kit producing energy...

  • OK Bassem, you have proof that you did the experiment. Even if you had someone else build it. You oversaw this right?

  • wow, very neat.

    For more videos like this and a community of like minds, visit ThinkStageDOTcom

  • GO ARABS 

  • Brillant. Angular momentum conservation.

  • if it was big enough to do real work as a wind mill it would probly shake it self apart due to the inbalance

  • novel idea but how efficient is it in translating the fluid motion into mechanical motion?

  • It's a tidal generator, but why have moving blades? Using curved blades would work much better and are not subject to jamming, breaking, or need for constant maintenance.

  • i think it will be have to replaced often. the swinging arms or blades are going to wear easily and fast enough. But it is a start. Keep at it. and good luck.

  • I know as much now as I did 5 minutes ago! What does it do? How does it work? What is its purpose? Do you just leave it on a table or in a bathtub and let it spin and it magically sends power to your appliences?

  • Nice work Bassem, check out my horizontal axis turbine following the logarithmic spiral

  • @omarabs

    I think it's just a prototype, he's just showing the concept, how it works......I planned this fifteen years ago, just like it, to use underwater...but, never did anything with it.....I still think it's a great idea..

  • for non directional purposes this would be great, not so much with directional though.. to much waisted energy. but still a good idea, maybe someone will buy it

  • this erector set looks rather slow and limited. i think a regular turbine would be just as if not more a tad bit more efficient and eliminates 95% of the moving parts this thing has.

  • Build this where the mouth of rivers meet oceans.

  • Think Solid State. Think oscillator instead of armature...

  • Just a question. Aren't there already hydro turbines? o.O

  • Yet another drag type turbine on YouTube.

  • Free Energy is real and its here! The Oil companies r doing everything they can to stop this

    information. If you want a Free energy magnet motor , get the blueprints at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM , Join the

    revolution!

  • So where is electricity ?

  • @2012ageoflight It doesn't matter where it is. As long you can put something rotating or moving up and down, you can generate electric power out of it. Just connect the rotating axis to a syncronous machine's rotor and you have a generator :D

  • very good

    :)

  • I invented a breakthrough source of energy which violates the law of conservation of energy. I have a PROOF that there are electrodynamic phenomena which violate the law of energy conservation. Making a 6 kW generator will cost $1200 in mass production, value of energy produced yearly $5400.

    I am looking for $300 000 for a prototype and $3M for patents.

    H. Tomasz Grzybowski

    tel. +48-512-933-540

  • what is that music at the beginning ?

  • @AnyThing999999999 It is for Famous and talented Egyptian composer named Omar Khairat, you can find many of his fabulous musics by searching for Omar Khairat Musics

  • scaled up enormously with a wind generator turbine and a hydraulic transmission created for wind turbine generators, you've got a great river turbine. Make it taller to catch even more, but the fact it works while so small is very encouraging.

  • wow grats you made a mwind mill and water wheel , how about start thinking intodays standards not 4000 years ago, i will give you that the designe is new but the principals of the item are the same

  • @eippo the future is elecricity from wind, water and solar using novel ways to extract as much energy as possible.

  • @PinkProgram of those 3 sources wind turbines are not reliable as wind vs demand and costs to erect and repair due to elements such as friction break down and in a perfect world no storms come along and destroy them.

  • @PinkProgram solar panels have about a 20 yr life span and require rare earths to work. as far as being cost effective wind power would be cheaper and in a perfect world assuming there are no defects to shorten panel life cycle, solstice peak 365 days a yr, no cloudy days and no storms to wipe out solar farms. imho is the least efficient of all forms of renewable energy.

  • @nudeteawithwoodreaux silicon and carbon aren't very rare... neither is titanium dioxide for that matter... solar batteries can be printed like paper or painted onto surfaces... What exactly are you talking about?

  • @PinkProgram now to produce those elements how much reliance on oil or fossil fuels is needed to make them abundant? you dont just go out in your back yard and dig that stuff up.

  • @nudeteawithwoodreaux you can dig silicon out of your backyard. Every organism on the planet contains carbon. Some organisms even contain titanium. No fossil fuels required.

  • @PinkProgram ok great you have me beat. no i didnt research where any of this stuff comes from but what i meant to say was without some kind of fossil fuel based made machine that runs off of fossil fuel of some kind from R&D to find where its most abundant and cost effective to extract, separate, and process so on. no wind mill would make that possible sorry i wasnt more clear. but im trying to get across how crucial fossil fuels are in our lives. with out them we would still be in the 1700s

  • @nudeteawithwoodreaux you know renewable fuels can be harvested from algae that do everything petrol does? By 2015 3% of the US's fuel consumption will be from harvested algae at the current rate of production. This isn't taking into account advances in production.

  • @PinkProgram oh and btw i am working on a neo magnetic generator because i am looking for a source of supplemental energy. so its not all a lost cause

  • @PinkProgram water would be the best of the 3 you speak of costwise, less fluxuations in speed and something actually more mathamatically reliable assuming there will never be any droughts to affect them. however you cant just set up a water turbine any where you desire its more of a chance game. this is why we are dependent upon fossil fuels. its abundant for now and portable anywhere at anytime at lower costs. sorry but its the sad truth. had we never found them we would still be in the 1700s.

  • Is it creating more energy that it takes to run the water or the fan, because that would be really cool? The video is so blurry, the specs are unreadable.

  • This is a tidal generator not a wave generator

    Its still good idea though

  • @ollieoniel

    But if the whole unit is floating up and down then we could have wave generator in plus (see Aero-Aqueous Multi-Purpose Renewable Power Station)

  • @bassemmorris

    oh yeah i suppose if you did it that way it would work as both

  • This can't be real. You can not make energy from nothing. And because of the friction it can not rotate on itself. It is impossible.

  • im impressed very good idea a lot of ppl dont know what this is caus they live in cities.

  • Bassem, you really need to patent this. It's quite a neat improvement of the conventional waterwheel.

  • @TheEEStudent

    Thanks my friend, my best wished to you.

  • not efficien at all !! GASRBAGE !

  • The fact that you have a propeller in essence with far to many moving parts just means a higher wear and failure rate.. The simple windmill is far more efficient and repairable and reliabl;e same with a simple water wheel that has no moving parts but a central hub. its already proven you have more friction and repair needs than a solid wind or water wheel and no this isnt breaking any new ground whatsoever and it isnt furthering anything to encourage this nonsense save your money for food

  • Doesn't look very efficient.

  • wow, you just invented a water wheel. Make that re-invented it. Stand it up and let the water, either, flow under it, or drop into it (cups) which will cause the wheel to turn. A very old invention indeed, but with much less moving parts, making it easier to repair.

  • uhmm yes, what he said this was done better centuries ago...

  • goof idea but this design was made years ago and had faults under loads as there are too many moving parts. just my 2 cents worth:) good idea thou

  • Dozen locomotive wheels do not stop it from competing with passenger cars running over 4 wheels only.

  • This sort of looks like the Robinson water turbine which is also here on YouTube.

    Nice job though.

  • I watched nice Robinson turbine before, it differs on having (3) far edges articulated swinging vanes compared with (8) near edges articulated vanes and in this last case the closed vanes forms cylindrical shape achieving better flow dynamics allowing adjacent unit turbines to harness more energy from wider surrounding flow efficiently.

    (Please refer to my related video "Aero-Aqueous Multi Purpose Renewable Power Station").

  • Umm, this isn't a new technology. Wind turbines and hydro turbines have been around for a while. Still good to play with different designs though. That's how we get higher efficiency designs.

  • You are totally right, the vertical axis turbines with swinging vanes are old ideas but the new things here are: 1- New designs to stack them vertically in towers, 2- New designs to build a complete renewable Aero-Aqueous power stations from them, 3- New idea of arranging them in staggered arrays perpendicularly to dominant wind/wave directions to improve the whole kinetic energy absorbed by each one.

    (Please refer to my related video)

  • Great idea. I've seen a similar design here in Youtube. Nevertheless, you have done something similar or might even be better. Keep up the good work.

  • The fact that you titled your drawing (3D) shows you dont know what you are talking about. It is called Orthographic.

  • Thanks to this notice from you.

  • Patented? I write patents....

  • cool but you would need like 50 of those to run a light-bulb. Keep trying, my friend. we need people like you thanks

  • This will depend on size of units, Larger you put more power you get.

  • Bassemmorris, nicely done, BUT it has been shown time and time again that the energy it produces is less than a standard fixed-fin water wheel. Seen this design back in college and was impressed with the concept, but so far all designs like this have shown it's better to focus on collecting water or wind, not both. Still, nice ability to change power sources if necessary ^.^

  • For submersed units we should consider the benefits of the following two important factors:-

    + Ability to utilize vertical wave movements by floating the units vertically.

    + The suitable staggered arraying method of units which will improve the output of each individual unit.

    The above two factors are achieved as shown in my other related video named (Aero-Aqueous Multi-Purpose renewable power station).

  • even if this proves a sound solution it still cant be deployed in a semnificative amount because it will affect the air speed(used in air) or currents speed(oceans) which tampers with nature and affects life overall in ways we cant predict.

  • The effect of global warming resulted from heavily using fossil fuels is the real threat to the Earth environment and it is the major motive causing significant changes in global air pressure, global rain cycles and global air pollution.

  • WOW! This is a powerful idea - on so many levels! Cutting the resistance on the other side is brilliant!  Keep it up!

  • Has it been tested in real world sea conditions? What happens when sand/sea weed/ ocean debris gets inside and creates friction on all those moving parts? Any longevity testing?

  • couldnt u just use a windmill but make it water proof and put it under water were the is a strong current. it would need less maintenance seeing as it has less moveing parts

  • Although regular windmill has less moving parts, but it is much weaker against strong currents and this factor is limiting the sizes of under water one compared with the windy one, Also in my design vertical wave movement utilizations could be achieved by floating the units vertically under water thus enhance the overall gained power efficiency. (Please watch my other complementary video named: Aero-Aqueous Multi-Purpose Renewable Power Station)

  • this looks good! but is it any more efficient than say a snail cage doing the same job, the ones I have seen run smoother and faster than your model but may develope less torque.would be good to see both sorts tested side by side! Nice model anyway,well done

  • The complete idea is to arrange group of units from same/similar design in a staggered way thus forming a resistance wall opposing the perpendicular flow, this will insure better power efficiency absorbed by the rotating units plus decreasing the passing flow energy to minimal as shown in my other video (Aero-Aqueous Multi Purpose Renewable Power Station)

  • i build websites, if you have an invention, u need a site to help advertise and sell your idea. contact me!

    copy the link to this video when u write me

  • simply and effective invention, keep it up and i hope to be reialized in a populer scale, best wishes for you.

  • putting this on a shore would also have it receive alot of energy from the retreating water/waves

  • Agree with you about possibility of putting such wheels in array near shore line but in such case they will not receive a lot of energy from retreating water/waves as the majority (about 60%) of water/wave energy will be consumed from first time passing thru wheels towards shore line, this 60% could be utilized into rotational movements in wheels against about 20% of passing energy absorbed by wheels in form of internal stresses leaving only about 20% of passing energy to escape.

  • very nice, kudoz to you sir

  • That's great. I have a patented invention and a working prototype I use on the job as an Electrician. Please have a look. I need all the contacts and help I can get! :)

    Thanks

    Harry (My username is Electrical007007007)

  • Good luck...

  • it actually looks very good. It appears (because there is a weight/ float on the flaps) when force is applied it adds extra force causing it to speed up. I bet the water version could drive a large motor too. Dont forget this is only a prototype, looks good to me.

  • Also putting those wheels in array perpendicularly to water/wind path will allow each one of them catching more power as flow will glide smoothly from one side of one wheel to hit the vanes of the other adjacent one (See my other video of Aero-Aqueous multi-purpose renewable power station).

  • How are you getting on with this? do you have any other interest in your idea? are you any further on actually producing full scale models? Its a big step to get to that stage so just wondered where u was at.

  • If it was serious he'd have a better video of it.

  • I made a blog on this subject. Check it out here!

    copy and paste on your internet explorer

    earthequalsenergy.blogspot. com

  • I like the idea, but it seems like it moves too slowly and the blades are too flimsy to generate the torque needed to produce sufficient power at those low RPMs.

  • The RPM is not the only factor in calculating resultant power as there is also the mass of moving water flow which is very big in such case. The density of water is 840 times density of air.

  • Why then hell is the writting in fluro green? You cant read it!

  • The best n only way to get real attention for energy inventions is to build a big one and just have free electricity. Power a house for a year or a neighborehood

  • wow ;] Hope it will be patented in huge scale !

  • simply awesome!

  • epic fail

  • that has got to be one of the stupidest inventions, I've ever seen. I can tell it's inefficient just by looking at it. Regular wind and waterturbines are likely much better.

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more