Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (64)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • The dr. responsible was struck off (aka is no longer a doctor.)

  • Do you understand what it would mean for a vaccine to cause autism? While horribly stumbled upon, you would have a vaccine that could change GENETICS. That in itself would be a medical breakthrough and grounds for nobel prize winning material. The simplest solution is that women are having children later in life than normal. Crudely put, the eggs the women are BORN with have gone bad. Not %100 of all autism cases are related to this, but it is a huge culprit.

  • @SykoEsquire An even bigger culprit- No matter what year the woman has a baby, a big correlation is 18mos at the time the child gets the MMR etc.... loaded with mercury and other nasties.

  • @cloudsifter11 Are you kidding me? A) The MMR vaccine no longer contains thimerosol (which is what the anti vax loons consider mercury, even though that's not entirely accurate), and B) Even when it did, the amount of mercury that entered your system was a tiny fraction of what you'd get eating a tuna sandwich. You really need to do some actual research, instead of just reading anti-vaccine websites.

  • What a white wash job. Is this the kind of educated idiots that are getting degrees?

  • @fuckwaddy How so? The link between autism and vaccines is completely non-existent. Anyone who regularly works with medical research and published papers can see that the evidence is completely lame, the problem is that the general public doesn't understand how scientific evidence works.

  • @compactdisk2 ...general public doesn't understand yada yada.... yah, same excuse given with Global Cooling, Global Warming, Climate Change... oh wait... they gave up on the cooling/warming thing.. now it's just "climate disruption".... Sorry Disk2... we have honest Scientists not on the govt dole all the way up the ladder to explain the real deal to us... perhaps you should check to see if you are just being fooled by the way the numbers are presented- any thing can be fiddled with stats.

  • @cloudsifter11 You have GOT to be kidding me. They have not given up on global warming at all, and to throw in the whole "cooling" thing just shows that you are completely ignorant of the facts. Global warming has been discussed since the 1950's. There were a handful of scientists in the 70's that proposed cooling was more likely, but they were not the majority. You clearly haven't got the slightest clue what you're talking about.

  • @fuckwaddy no no, the kind you are talking about come out and try to convince us of 'climate disruption' etc etc.... LOL

  • Why is it, that when the government, health officials, doctors, and the scientific community are all saying one thing, and the tabloids are saying another, that some people listen to the tabloids... WHY?!?!!

  • Because it's more fun to read a tabloid than a scientific journal to the masses.

  • @knifesson Largely- things that don't benefit big pharma don't get into mainstream literature... then big pharma says "oh your studies aren't peer reviewed"... but they fail to mention that if you aren't on the dole... you don't get peer reviewed in THEIR journals.

  • @cloudsifter11 WTF are you talking about? You clearly have no clue how peer review works. If you actually understood how the scientific community worked, you'd realize that the biggest critics of big pharma are the "mainstream scientists" who you hate. They just criticize the actual issues, not the made up junk science you buy into.

  • Maybe if the Government did lie so much (and pay health officials, doctors, and the scientific community to lie for them) then people would actually believe them.

    Maybe you are telling the truth. The fact remains that Autism cases are becoming more prevalent, your medical science experts don't have any reasonable explanation why, and people are concerned about their Health...

    Also the vaccines contain a mercury based preservative. Mercury is toxic to the brain and central nervous system.

  • @AlienScientist We have more Austistic people now for the same reason that we have far more alergic people around now. But its not a nice subject so the press and government don't talk about it.

    .

    Up until now these people died.

    .

    Even 30-40 years ago.

    .

    Now they don't so we have more.

  • @neverfearchrisishere Well Genius, NOT QUITE... that might be the way they taught you in grade school that statistics work, but you are mistaken... it's more than just simple grade school math, you have to use big boy math...statistically even though there are more people and naturally there would be more total numbers of something- PER CAPITA.. the rate has gone way way UP since vaccines were instituted. So, see perhaps if you can sign up for an adult refresher course in statistics. Kaaay? bye

  • @cloudsifter11 You are a moron. I get the feeling you don't know a whole lot about math. A few facts about autism & increasing rates: The range of symptoms that are considered autism was dramatically increased, leading to far more people being diagnosed. Also, diagnosis techniques have improved dramatically, also leading to more diagnosis. I don't know what kind of fantasy world you live in, but I don't get the impression you're interested in honest research, just trying to prove yourself right.

  • @compactdisk2 It doesn't take someone with autism to diagnosis someone with autism, (so easy a caveman can do it.)

  • SHOTS are for drug addicts.

    TV is for brainwashing.

    Cowmilk is for calves.

    School is for children with parents that do not have the time to educate their child themselves.

    Fluoride is used against an ant plaque or rat plaque.

    Light products are for people who want cancer more early in life so they can get a chemo to get skinny quick and die.

    Taste enhancers is in food that does not taste good or to make it taste very good and make it addictive so you eat more and get fat with tumors incl

  • gridlocksystem - Every statement is truth in that and I noticed you got thumbs down for posting the truth.

  • Oxygen contains free radicals which cause cancer. Please, for the sake of humanity, stop breathing.

  • nowadays everything causes cancer

  • Its never as easy as the 'media' make it out to be. I suggest you read bad science if you haven't already. For example anti oxidants have been shown (using meta analysis) to increase the risk of cancer. Just like vaccines and autism all the apparent evidence is either poorly conducted or has not been published via peer review.

  • Oxygen doesn't cause cancer.

  • Oxygen has been shown to damage DNA en vivo. Oxygen free radicals are a common product of cellular biochemistry. All you need is a free radical to hit the right spot on the p53 gene and you'll possibly get a cancer cell. Now there are a few innate checks and balances built in to kill off cancer cells but these don't always work.

    This is why no matter how clean a life you live you're still being bombarded by cosmic rays and free radicals

    We're all gonna die!

  • Ownage!

  • AUTISM IS NOT A DISEASE.  Get your facts straight.

  • A disease is defined as:

    "An abnormal condition of an organism that impairs bodily functions, associated with specific symptoms and signs. It may be caused by external factors, such as invading organisms, or it may be caused by internal dysfunctions, such as autoimmune diseases."

    Autism is a disease by that definition, and his facts ARE straight. If you'd bothered to look up what a disease was before posting this comment you could have saved yourself some time.

  • @sirnlawson Autism does not impair bodily functions. Autism is not caused by invading organisms or autoimmune diseases. Read the words; do they make sense? Sheesh, what an illiterate society.

  • @shirlsmid

    Admittedly, "bodily functions" could be misunderstood.

    The word "may", however, should not be.

    Let me try this again.

    "Disease (plural diseases)

    (pathology) An abnormal condition of the body or mind that causes discomfort or dysfunction; distinct from injury insofar as the latter is usually instantaneously acquired.

    (by extension) Any abnormal or harmful condition, as of society, people's attitudes, way of living etc."

    Decide for yourself, does Autism fit that definition?

  • @shirlsmid

    P.S.

    "Illiterate (comparative more illiterate, superlative most illiterate)

    Unable to read and write.

    Having less than an expected standard of familiarity with language and literature, or having little formal education.

    Not conforming to prescribed standards of speech or writing."

    Sorry, I don't really fit that definition either. You're not having much luck, really.

  • PMbeers: Rubella is mostly damaging to the growing fetus of a pregnant woman. There was a rubella epidemic in the early 1960s, which resulted in many stillbirths, and then the children who were born alive but had disabilities including deafness, blindness, severe mental retardation and autism. Rubella in utero is a known cause of autism.

  • Dear Dr. Salzberg, thanks for posting this series of talks on autism.

    Sorry about all the woo comments.

  • Wow. Just...wow.

    I was at this presentation. (In fact, I wonder if my voice will be picked up in the later vids.)

    kkaayyee, I have read the Wakefield study. There is nothing about thimerosal in the Wakefield study. If you're going to cite pseudoscience, get your sources straight.

  • oh, yes, there is a LOT of BAD, HORRIBLE and CARELESS science in autism reasearch - but it isn't being done by the ones looking at what happens on the cellular biological level who are finding ways to resverse the HORRIBLE mainstream science that has made our kids as damaged as they are.

  • There is a lot of TERRIBLE science connected with autism research... the failure of DNA researchers to recognize the Triton X-100 they use to extract DNA from cells for research is used to "wash" the viral elements in vaccines and ends up being injected with the vaccine, no one notices the mito damage it does in the kids because it is a standard, lab tool...

    or the aluminum adjuvants used to create food allergies in lab animals being the same aluminum adjuvants used in kids' vaccines...

  • Outside his research area-- I would agree!!!

    Stick with computer science!!!

  • This guy had Rubella and he recovered! How many kids had the Rubella vaccine and have not recovered?

  • Almost 100%. Only those with weak immune systems get rubella from vaccines, but this is a weakened form of rubella so they stand a much better chance than if they got actual rubella.

  • "they stand a much better chance than if they got actual rubella"

    Only, the rubella vaccine doesn't prevent rubella. There is no scientific evidence whatsoever to show that vaccines prevent diseases.

  • I have scientific evidence of the effectiveness of vaccines. PM me if you aren't just some antivax hack and want the link.

  • I have scientific evidence proving that vaccines are based on junk science with CDC records and graphs for the analytical. PM me if you aren't just some pro vax shill and you want the link.

  • I have a mild case of Autism...

  • "I have a mild case of Autism.."

    Make sure you don't ever have any mosre vaccinations, or it may get worse.

  • I don't get vaccinations anymore. Again, I am living proof that Autism can be helped mentally and that it is not some physical toxin disease.

  • "Autism is not some physical toxin disease"

    In sme cases it isn't, but IMO most so-called "autism" cases are vaccine-related neurological disorders including developmental regression wrongly diagnosed as "autsm."

  • Your opinion is not valid as a source. No scientific research has ever corroborated your wild guesswork.

  • "Your opinion is not valid as a source"

    It is based on what I know, and as such is far more valid to me than studies which are mostly financed by pharmaceutical studies and often designed with a pre-determined result in mind. I know how the medical-pharmaceutical establishment operates. Vaccination is much like a mafia protection racket.

  • No, States and Governments are like a mafia protection racket. Assuming what you say is true, which it is probably not, this would not be like a mafia protection racket, it would be more like the tobacco industry. But if you look at the history of big tobacco you would see that it lost to scientific inquiry. Is that because it is smaller than the pharmaceutical industry? Or is it just that your calls for conspiracy are perhaps based on nothing.

  • "States and Governments are like a mafia protection racket."

    Yes, but in case you haven't noticed, the big corporations, including the medical-pharmaceutical concerns, work hand in hand with the psychopaths in charge of running governments.

    I sincerely hope that the vax mafia will be in the dock too, in the not too distant future.

  • Hey did I say it like it was a bad thing? I was only talking about the general "business model" organization of it. The pharmaceutical companies have a completely different model.

  • I believe you. I've seen it with my own group of people with autistic children recovering.

  • Right, epidemiological studies dont work on toxins..

    ....

  • Correct- the symptoms of autism have always been around, but not this young and in combination with other chronic diseases. One common symptom is altzheimer's, but never in this young and not in combination with seizures, allergies, diabetes, brain tumor, ADD, ADHD, tics, stroke...

  • You're a moron by every definition. I have Autism and had withdrawl symptoms since I was born. I am now an HFA. I was by no way affected by any vaccine. Get a personal view before assuming to know everything.

    (reply to kkaayyee321, not about the video itself)

  • and what do you know?

  • Okay, I used to be worse, but I got HELPED. Helped with purely mental treatment.

    Maybe you think vaccines are bad, have it your way. I just know that it has been proved that vaccines do NOT cause Autism.

  • I hope you enjoy this talk. Note that the talk included 2 videos, one from 60 Minutes (an interview with Andrew Wakefield) and one from the Larry King Live show (an interview with 5 people including 2 scientists and 3 anti-vaccine activists). Both video segments, about 5 min. each, were deleted over concerns about copyright, but I hope you'll find the talk easy to follow nonetheless.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more