@techdude6693 That's good to hear. I can't find any fault with the Forte Hatch yet. I as well went with the Forte.I could only find 2 used GTS in my area.
Picked up one last Sunday from a dealer in Southern California. It was a new "leftover" 2010 (only 10 miles on it - brand new). With a 2K rebate I got it for $17,000 out the door. That's amazing for the level of equipment the GTS has (got the CVT). Its a great car for the money. Keep getting looks from everyone around town - people really notice it (and ignore cars like Civics since there's a ton of them out there).
@1waffleiron Its on the Mitsubishi USA website for the model where it describes the option packages available (and that one is the "Sun and Sound" package). Its not important - its just every website and every review I've read or listen to has called it a 10" subwoofer.
@davids7319 ... the roof starts sloping too soon unlike traditional hatchbacks. The Mazda 3, Impreza, and Matrix are much more versatile and larger cargo area.
@pvpftwqwerty i've got one it's a good car, looks are great so is the audio system, it has a lot of space even in the back seats, previously i've owned a mitsubishi carisma, 320000 km and no major failures (once starter died and the AC compressor had to be changed), i believe this car should be durable. On the downside the it accelerates a bit slow (140HP), it weighs a lot
I own one of this cars, best decision of my life really nice really sporty nice looking and good gas milage, I recommend it to everyone u won't regret it
they could have put a little more thought into the rear design, it doesn't look right. from a side view, the rear looks awkward. I will admit I am an impreza owner, I might have actaully bought this instead. Don't think I'm bashing this car, I'm not. I will admit though, the sound system is probably better than my impreza
OMFG THIS IS NOT A HATCHBACK !! THIS IS EXACTLY AS LONG AS THE LANCER SEDAN AND HAS A BIGGER TRUNK THAN THE SEDAN .. A HATCHBACK CAN'T BE AS LONG A SEDAN!! .ITS A SPORTBACK !! IT"S SOMETHING DIFFERENT !!
just got this car last weekend, i love it, i got one exactly like this one meaning, color, and the stereo system plus the leather. drives great, really good gas mileage, one thing he doesnt tlk about is the amazing warranty: 10 yr/ 100,000mi powertrain, and 5yr/ 60,000mi on everythin else
@liberty211662 dont get me wrong I LOVE BMW, i grew up loving them, but this car is awesome for someone in college like me (i dont have a steady income... yet)
@kaliuv not everyone keeps their car, untill the paint starts stripping of it bro! Plus if thats the only flaw it has, that's good enough for me. Just get a paint protection, and you'll be fine for a long time.
I saw this car in person yesterday (the base model). I didn't even bother looking at the sticker before I climbed into it because I thought it was out of my league price wise (27,000 to 30,000). I was very impressed with the interior even for it being a base model. Again it screamed out of my league. I got out the car and saw the sticker and had to go back and check the mileage on the car. The car had 9.5 miles on it and was tagged at $20,995. This is a great price for such a great car.
Have you seen this car in person or better yet sitting right next to a normal lancer? I just did today and if there is any difference in length at all it's very minimal maybe an inch or two but I'm pretty sure they are the same size. The only difference I saw body wise was the hatch and the rear bumper. And trust me I was looking for size differences. I'll admit on it's own it looks bigger but side by side you realize they are the same or so damn close that it doesn't matter.
@UvisionMedia, yes, and your right if it wasnt because i read in R&T that the sportback is just a bit bigger i would have thought they are exactly the same size, but still, its not a hatchback its a station wagon, look up the past lancer sportbacks, they are all station wagons, they are for moms, i wouldnt want to be driving one, i would very much prefer the lighter cooler looking normal lancer then the moms wagon
I've owned my far share of station wagons and this is not one. You don't really gain any more space behind the rear seat with the sportback. I couldn't put my dog back there without her having to be all smashed up and end out laying down the whole time. Just because you think it looks like a wagon and don't like it doesn't mean it is one. I'm sure the only reason for have the hatch is because you can lay the seats down flat and gain a ton of storage space easily accessed through the hatch.
your right about the space and the dog thing, thats why its such a dumb station wagon, and thats why i think there is better station wagon options for my mom. i hatch back should be shorter, lighter, sportier, compact, agile, smaller and practical, this one is non of those, its heavier, longer, useless, less sporty and it looks like a moms car, definitely a station wagon, the normal lancer is 100 times better looking. google images " 2004 lancer sportback" the true nature and roots of this car
Yes the 2004 lancer sportback is a wagon. That doesn't make the 2010 sportback a wagon. That's like saying the 2010 Chevy Malibu is a muscle car because the Malibu use to be a muscle car back in the day. Or let's use the Dodge Charger as an exampled. That use to be a killer muscle car and now is a for door pile of shit. The 2004 Sportback is considerably longer than a normal Lancer that's why that was a wagon. The 2010 is not. Ether way you choose to see it. It's a nice car. I'd take it.
@UvisionMedia your right the name doesnt matter, what really matters is the differences, no? the sportback ralliart is 110lbs heavier then the normal ra , thats like carrying a bag with 110lbs of rocks in your trunk all the time. I just dont see the point, the normal lancer is esthetically better balanced, thus better looking, its lighter, thus better power to weight, more agile, thats defiantly cooler, & like you said, non is really more practical so that kinda doesnt matter
Can you put up videos of you racing or driving fast just any videos on this car no one has their own on here just reviews but i want to see it more personally
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
FREAKING UGLY!
I have a 2008 lancer looks great, but this SB, pwhahaha Compared to the new wrxsti and the mazdaspeed3, Bishi really failed on there attempt on this. I'll let my grandma know this car is out, so she can go buy it and take her friends out to bingo night.
168 hp in the motor - 15% is =142.8 whp for 23 grand and 3,539lbs is like $151 x pound mmmmm no way is to much money for this car ,maybe 200 hp in this car for same price is ok for 170 whp
But don't forget that 2010 models comes to sale on the 4th quarter of 2009... So anything on sale from now on is most likely a 2010 model... What cars have changed dramaticaly from 2009 to 2010? Very few...
why i would like a lancer hatchback that its almost the same as the sedan except the rear ..... thats idiotic good one mitsubishi one more reason to my not buying one jajajajajajaja ill preferred the subaru 1000 times...
What a cheap ugly interior...very outdated and cheap...ive sat in all the lancer's, junk...and the fact they put the same front end on everything, not cool!
yea i remember that. i didnt like it that much though... actually i just saw it and it looks pretty ridiculous looking. i think i like cars that dont look ordinary and is also sporty and sort of practical. lol
I'm tied between this and the Kia Forte hatch, both are so nice..
asb81689 1 month ago
@asb81689 I was in the same position and got the Forte
techdude6693 1 month ago
@techdude6693 That's good to hear. I can't find any fault with the Forte Hatch yet. I as well went with the Forte.I could only find 2 used GTS in my area.
asb81689 1 month ago
@asb81689 Sweet! which version did u get?
techdude6693 1 month ago
MMmmmm....love a flat load floor. very hot.
TheSuperMotoHooligan 3 months ago
what was that, that is so ugly car i want to go kick a baby.
eecclliippssee 4 months ago
Mitsubishi is my favorite japanese company followed by Nissan !
shady965 9 months ago
Picked up one last Sunday from a dealer in Southern California. It was a new "leftover" 2010 (only 10 miles on it - brand new). With a 2K rebate I got it for $17,000 out the door. That's amazing for the level of equipment the GTS has (got the CVT). Its a great car for the money. Keep getting looks from everyone around town - people really notice it (and ignore cars like Civics since there's a ton of them out there).
Jeffredo729 9 months ago
Comment removed
1waffleiron 9 months ago
@1waffleiron From Mitsubishi's website: "710-Watt (Max) Rockford-Fosgate® Punch Premium Sound System including 10” Subwoofer".
Jeffredo729 9 months ago
@Jeffredo729 What country are you in? Says kickers for me.
1waffleiron 9 months ago
@1waffleiron Its on the Mitsubishi USA website for the model where it describes the option packages available (and that one is the "Sun and Sound" package). Its not important - its just every website and every review I've read or listen to has called it a 10" subwoofer.
Jeffredo729 9 months ago
@1waffleiron haha a 10 inch kicker?? you idiot
chinchillawrangler 4 months ago
@davids7319 And look better while doing it. That's a benefit in itself.
Jeffredo729 10 months ago
@davids7319 ... the roof starts sloping too soon unlike traditional hatchbacks. The Mazda 3, Impreza, and Matrix are much more versatile and larger cargo area.
davidhalifax 10 months ago
i like how he pronouces 'impreza' so coool ;-P
MeowChicken123 1 year ago
23K is the base price shown but they sell for 17 which is what I paid for my GTS Sportback. This car is a great deal for 17K. Love it.
mrcoder 1 year ago
I've found a great fully loaded 2010 of these but just not sure
pvpftwqwerty 1 year ago
@pvpftwqwerty i've got one it's a good car, looks are great so is the audio system, it has a lot of space even in the back seats, previously i've owned a mitsubishi carisma, 320000 km and no major failures (once starter died and the AC compressor had to be changed), i believe this car should be durable. On the downside the it accelerates a bit slow (140HP), it weighs a lot
totalmalfunction 1 year ago
I own one of this cars, best decision of my life really nice really sporty nice looking and good gas milage, I recommend it to everyone u won't regret it
MrEviloso 1 year ago
ratingz.tk/mitsubishi-lancer-evo-vs-subaru-impreza.html Vote for EVO
2gereksiz 1 year ago 2
annnnd my parents are getting a fucking prius instead of this!? fml..
Vitalylovesyou 1 year ago 2
@Vitalylovesyou I have this car, it's a piece of shit. Sell the Prius and get a BMW.
ProfessorYoungMoney 1 year ago
they could have put a little more thought into the rear design, it doesn't look right. from a side view, the rear looks awkward. I will admit I am an impreza owner, I might have actaully bought this instead. Don't think I'm bashing this car, I'm not. I will admit though, the sound system is probably better than my impreza
turkishberkan2 1 year ago
OMFG THIS IS NOT A HATCHBACK !! THIS IS EXACTLY AS LONG AS THE LANCER SEDAN AND HAS A BIGGER TRUNK THAN THE SEDAN .. A HATCHBACK CAN'T BE AS LONG A SEDAN!! .ITS A SPORTBACK !! IT"S SOMETHING DIFFERENT !!
Twixx32 1 year ago
That dude is THE MAN. Fuck your paddling fuck your + -. That dang thing's got a clutch and proper gearbox.
mistamontiel 1 year ago
just got this car last weekend, i love it, i got one exactly like this one meaning, color, and the stereo system plus the leather. drives great, really good gas mileage, one thing he doesnt tlk about is the amazing warranty: 10 yr/ 100,000mi powertrain, and 5yr/ 60,000mi on everythin else
Durandahl 1 year ago
good review
essyayen 1 year ago
27 MPG on the highway? That's pathetic, especially when you consider the small size of the engine and the manual transmission.
AvalonMan96 1 year ago
just get a bmw or mercedes
liberty211662 1 year ago
@liberty211662 dont get me wrong I LOVE BMW, i grew up loving them, but this car is awesome for someone in college like me (i dont have a steady income... yet)
butterguy217 1 year ago
US models are extremely different from the EU ones. Unbeliveable, that a 167 hp engine is the standard, and 20mpg..
BokorugroRR 1 year ago
@BokorugroRR It would get better mpg if your fat ass wasn't in it
SirWilliamLeys 1 year ago
im in love with this car and im definetely gonna buy it when i get the chance!
ephialtikos 1 year ago 2
don't buy mitsubishi if u care about paint quality.
kaliuv 1 year ago
@kaliuv not everyone keeps their car, untill the paint starts stripping of it bro! Plus if thats the only flaw it has, that's good enough for me. Just get a paint protection, and you'll be fine for a long time.
MeMrJust 1 year ago
@kaliuv metallic paint usually lasts forever, so i suggest u get that.
TheDemoarchive 1 year ago
Only problem I have is that you have to spend $3400 in upgrades that I don't want just to get a moon roof.
UvisionMedia 1 year ago
I saw this car in person yesterday (the base model). I didn't even bother looking at the sticker before I climbed into it because I thought it was out of my league price wise (27,000 to 30,000). I was very impressed with the interior even for it being a base model. Again it screamed out of my league. I got out the car and saw the sticker and had to go back and check the mileage on the car. The car had 9.5 miles on it and was tagged at $20,995. This is a great price for such a great car.
UvisionMedia 1 year ago
so the wrx wagon now has a competitor sort of.
Klodust 1 year ago 3
yup thats a wagon not a hatchback!
Jabronie0 1 year ago
Dont like the color or rims but that is an amazing car.
skyman95946 2 years ago
is this AWD?
Don612Juan 2 years ago
thats not a hatch back! its even longer then the normal lancer, its more like a station wagon
gggromay 2 years ago
Have you seen this car in person or better yet sitting right next to a normal lancer? I just did today and if there is any difference in length at all it's very minimal maybe an inch or two but I'm pretty sure they are the same size. The only difference I saw body wise was the hatch and the rear bumper. And trust me I was looking for size differences. I'll admit on it's own it looks bigger but side by side you realize they are the same or so damn close that it doesn't matter.
UvisionMedia 1 year ago
@UvisionMedia, yes, and your right if it wasnt because i read in R&T that the sportback is just a bit bigger i would have thought they are exactly the same size, but still, its not a hatchback its a station wagon, look up the past lancer sportbacks, they are all station wagons, they are for moms, i wouldnt want to be driving one, i would very much prefer the lighter cooler looking normal lancer then the moms wagon
gggromay 1 year ago
I've owned my far share of station wagons and this is not one. You don't really gain any more space behind the rear seat with the sportback. I couldn't put my dog back there without her having to be all smashed up and end out laying down the whole time. Just because you think it looks like a wagon and don't like it doesn't mean it is one. I'm sure the only reason for have the hatch is because you can lay the seats down flat and gain a ton of storage space easily accessed through the hatch.
UvisionMedia 1 year ago
your right about the space and the dog thing, thats why its such a dumb station wagon, and thats why i think there is better station wagon options for my mom. i hatch back should be shorter, lighter, sportier, compact, agile, smaller and practical, this one is non of those, its heavier, longer, useless, less sporty and it looks like a moms car, definitely a station wagon, the normal lancer is 100 times better looking. google images " 2004 lancer sportback" the true nature and roots of this car
gggromay 1 year ago
Yes the 2004 lancer sportback is a wagon. That doesn't make the 2010 sportback a wagon. That's like saying the 2010 Chevy Malibu is a muscle car because the Malibu use to be a muscle car back in the day. Or let's use the Dodge Charger as an exampled. That use to be a killer muscle car and now is a for door pile of shit. The 2004 Sportback is considerably longer than a normal Lancer that's why that was a wagon. The 2010 is not. Ether way you choose to see it. It's a nice car. I'd take it.
UvisionMedia 1 year ago 3
Comment removed
gggromay 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@UvisionMedia your right the name doesnt matter, what really matters is the differences, no? the sportback ralliart is 110lbs heavier then the normal ra , thats like carrying a bag with 110lbs of rocks in your trunk all the time. I just dont see the point, the normal lancer is esthetically better balanced, thus better looking, its lighter, thus better power to weight, more agile, thats defiantly cooler, & like you said, non is really more practical so that kinda doesnt matter
gggromay 1 year ago
Nice car...
JAALMARZA 2 years ago 2
The rear windsheild is so steep that it doesn't really gain any cargo spaces compared to Mazda 3 or Impreza.
davidhalifax 2 years ago
Why get this when you can get a 2010 wrx for 24k? The wrx can run circles around this P.O.S. all day, all night long.
pinocolado 2 years ago
Or i can run circles around your dream car "wrx" with my Sportback Ralliart.
TacoManTuesday 2 years ago 3
amen! :D
12inferno 2 years ago
I just bought a Ralliart Sportback and it's killer. Traded my WRX FOR it. Much better car.
rolexgmtfan 2 years ago 3
Can you put up videos of you racing or driving fast just any videos on this car no one has their own on here just reviews but i want to see it more personally
naekerb 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
FREAKING UGLY!
I have a 2008 lancer looks great, but this SB, pwhahaha Compared to the new wrxsti and the mazdaspeed3, Bishi really failed on there attempt on this. I'll let my grandma know this car is out, so she can go buy it and take her friends out to bingo night.
TheKaotikkaos 2 years ago
u've a dream
Liberaltedjo 2 years ago
I like it a lot! Looks better than most hatchbacks.
blazin8d7 2 years ago 18
Haha he said "sleek looks". That thing is just plain ugly. But I guess to each his own.
JetBlueIce 2 years ago
168 hp in the motor - 15% is =142.8 whp for 23 grand and 3,539lbs is like $151 x pound mmmmm no way is to much money for this car ,maybe 200 hp in this car for same price is ok for 170 whp
Ganbala 2 years ago
$151 a pound ? Who gives a fuck?
pinocolado 2 years ago
never liked mike hanley....he just comes across as a douche nozzle in these reviews.
th3ha1og0d 2 years ago 5
My thoughts exactly!
JetBlueIce 2 years ago
what so nice about this car? 2010 model? so ugly...
sarsattack 2 years ago
But don't forget that 2010 models comes to sale on the 4th quarter of 2009... So anything on sale from now on is most likely a 2010 model... What cars have changed dramaticaly from 2009 to 2010? Very few...
scoobeydoooo 2 years ago
thats so FRIKKIN BORING
dunemoonbeam 2 years ago
why i would like a lancer hatchback that its almost the same as the sedan except the rear ..... thats idiotic good one mitsubishi one more reason to my not buying one jajajajajajaja ill preferred the subaru 1000 times...
88462 2 years ago
lotsa Venza in the back
killercan10 2 years ago
With this......they killed the LANCER,very ugly model ....
Keep the LANCER SEDAN or nothing..
fegue2 2 years ago 3
That back looks EXACTLY like an Infiniti Fx..wow. But the rest is ugly
steve9509 2 years ago
not the best design
but till better the 70% car on the road
hdzsound 2 years ago
it looks disgusting
mellowdalyricist 2 years ago 4
eww...
real4real2 2 years ago
This annoies me, why can't they create their own style ? They're copying the AUDI front, but it's a so shitty copy
XFXBoard 2 years ago
wow ugly car and pretty crappy fuel mileage!!
remustintoi 2 years ago
THey designed this car to undertake some good hatchbacks' market. This is not a car of quality
1g2002541 2 years ago
What a cheap ugly interior...very outdated and cheap...ive sat in all the lancer's, junk...and the fact they put the same front end on everything, not cool!
davewhodavedunn 2 years ago
i hate this hatchback ugly! just as bad as the CTS wagan!! WHAT WHERE THEY THINKING?!!!!!
BIGGIEDEVIL 2 years ago
its fugly
badgerbuddy 2 years ago
they can make this, but cant make a competitive galant???....2's....
bluestarkad17 2 years ago
anybody notice that the rear end looks ALMOST EXACTLY like an Infiniti EX?!
Artyfil 2 years ago 2
go get a subaru
irishheather07 2 years ago
looks really bland, there is nothing that appeals to me. Just another 13 feet of car.
mrjost55 2 years ago 2
Ugly
quatlen 2 years ago
And yet, still prettier than Impreza.
ilvanezzo 2 years ago 25
Reminds me so much of the Toyota Venza.
TerryFilming 2 years ago
I like this reviewer!
deepakm 2 years ago
... i think i want a sport back, even though im more of a camaro pony car person. i wonder if any american companies will make a sport back car.
305pride 2 years ago
04-07 There was a Chevy Malibu Maxx, same idea as this. I don't think this any new ones though
StuinthaHouse 2 years ago
yea i remember that. i didnt like it that much though... actually i just saw it and it looks pretty ridiculous looking. i think i like cars that dont look ordinary and is also sporty and sort of practical. lol
305pride 2 years ago
Nice hot hatch!
ludicer 2 years ago
finally
lamdo23 2 years ago
I've not liked Mitsubishi ever seance they bombed pearl harbor (jk) but this one seem pretty good, for a family car.
bloodironfire 2 years ago
Ford and GM helped Nazi Germany though -.-
FerrariandBMW 2 years ago
Ugly car, just like the new Impreza. The old saloon versions look much better.
RossFxx 2 years ago 2
they still make the 4 doors
lamp7002 2 years ago
Looks nice. But the STi hatch still looks better
OrangePHX 2 years ago
my crotch looks better.
ILVRACN 2 years ago
Sedan Lancer looks so much better than this. not sure if i'm liking the design of the rear end of the car.
crustpunk 2 years ago 2
Looks much better than the old Sportback.
rnorred86 2 years ago 2
Was that the wagon? I think it looked really good, but if I remember correctly it only came with an automatic. Here in Canada at least.
lesmcluffalot 2 years ago
nice
imran88 2 years ago