This obvious liar reminds me a lot of George W. Bush. Can't talk straight on an issue. Can't look at you straight in the eye. Hum hum my lines, my lines. Don't let the controlled media decide for you. Apathy and ignorance are the tools of fools who are headed for complete slavery. This great nation is founded on the principle of LIBERTY. Look it up and become Ron Paul!
i totally agree, this guy is pure 100% phoney bullshit who will use fear, patriotism , and religion to win an election, but not actual plans and ideas.
This guy is an ACTOR people. He has voted against guns in the senate. He is a member of CFR who try to take guns away from Americans. Wake up here!!!!
Straw Poll Update... Ron Paul's Head-to-Head Records: Rudy Giuliani 23-3-0 Mitt Romney 15-11-0 Fred Thompson 13-12-0 John McCain 22-3-0 Mike Huckabee 21-3-1 Sam Brownback 22-2-1 Tom Tancredo 23-1-0 Duncan Hunter 22-2-0 GIVE, GIVE, GIVE. When RON PAUL pardons you from paying your income taxes you will get it all back ten fold times ten; and it will just keep multiplying for your children and grandchildren. RONPAUL2008 COM
Hmmm looks like congressman Paul has more first, second and third place finishes than anyone, including the "frontrunners." The media lies and lies to you. Ignorance and apathy are no excuse for becoming a complete slave, but they do cause it.
These CFR globalists,ultimately, don't want us to have guns. How can they have NWO if we can resist? Fred is as fake as the rest. We don't need an actor,we need a leader who cares about our heritage. RON PAUL
Ron Paul treats the Constitution as though it was perfect. Even the framers themselves, know that the Constitution is nowhere near perfection. Also, the framers meant to allow for the Constitution's interpretations to change with society, Ron Paul seems to disregard this. Dr. Paul thinks that we should interpret the constitution as if we lived in the 18th century.
Is taking away constitutional rights,ok,just as long as it's during the war on terror?Simply because we live in the 21st century? Herr Hitler was just over 65 years ago, he gained power legally, then said his constitution was outdated, and did not represent the current threat to Germany,and so it was "quaint". I think most of us,who can actually point to the U.S. on a map, knows what happened next. All in the name of SAVING Deutschland from the Bolshevik terrorists...
I am huge supporter of the Constitution. And yes, Bush has pretty much done everything short of ripping up the constitution itself. But, keeping the same interpretation as the 1700's is like pretending that we still live in the 1700's. No, our domestic threats are much, much different. Think of all the technological advances and social changes.
Please divulge the information as to how the President has ripped up the constitution? I dont know if any of you took history or government...or for that matter READ the constitution. But only Congress can change the constitution (if approved by the states of course) - not the President.
No constitution rights should definitely not be taken away. And don't you think it's a little hypocritical that Dr. Paul is the biggest advocate for small, no tiny government, but he also wants the government to intervene and stop a woman's right to choose? And, no I am not talking about drafting or even changing the constitution, just its interpretation, to move it up to the 21st century.
WHAT? YOU ARE MISINFORMED. Ron Paul says it's the states' decision, not the Federal Governments. I think you may have misinterpreted "state". While he is personally against it, he does NOT think the federal government should intervene with a "woman's right to choose"...
The reason abortions are legal is because the federal government decided that a human fetus is not a "Person". What if the federal government decides that blacks aren't people? Would you support white people "Having the right to choose" if blacks live or die? It's not about abortions; Ron Paul doesn't support the government classifying who is a person and who isn't, and it's sad that you do Steinway101.
I think that's the worst analogy I've ever heard. So if you're prolife, you believe that the baby should be born even if the woman was raped, or she will die at birth. That's like forgetting about all the people who die from gun violence, just to support guns, oh wait you probably do that anyway. Kucinich 08
If your only concern is with rape and medical problems, then why do we kill 1.37 million living human fetus's per year when less than 13,700 of them are from rape, and less than 82,200 even classify as causing a POTENTIAL health risk? And this stupid gun argument you make, what about all the people that die in cars and pools, have you ever considered that? And what's this, you don't support the 2nd amendment because of gun violence? What's your stance on knifes and knife violence?
The Second Amendment guarantees the First Amendment. Your right to bear arms is about guarding against tyranny - not hunting. The Republican and Democratic Parties have taken increasingly tyrannical positions - especially this latest President Bush. I don't see Fred Thompson standing up against the "unitary executive" theories espoused by the current President, so I have no trust in his pandering to "the Second Amendment crowd".
Duncan Hunter is the candidate of choice for conservatives. View Thompson's record on amnesties at Americans for Better Immigration. Thompson voted for an amnesty to illegal aliens from Nicaragua and Cuba. Sen. Thompson voted for a procedural move that helped allow the Mack Amendment to be included in S.1156. This amendment granted amnesty to illegal aliens from Nicaragua and Cuba and added close to one million people to U.S. population.
Fredagogue is not so hot on the 1st amendment, while luke-warm at best on gun rights. Gunowner dot org details his positions on the guns.
qoute:
Gun owners should also be aware that Thompson unabashedly favors the odious McCain-Feingold Incumbent Protection Act. This legislation, characterized by its proponents as campaign finance reform, severely limits the abilities of groups like GOA to inform the public about the gun rights voting records of politicians already in office."
On his first interview with Mike Wallace, Fred said straight out that Mc-F "did not work as designed"...Look it up. Fred was the first real Rep. we've had that tried to actually do something about the purchase of politicians. If jerks like McCain and Feingold stayed out of it, it wouldn't have gone sideways.
Fred bargained to raise the limit of hard money on Mc-F, that's it.
Go back to what I'll laughingly refer to as your research.
Fred Thompson is a hypocrite. We would not have 12 to 20 million illegals if he would not have contributed to an "open borders" immigration when he was in the Senate. This is why Americans for Better Immigration gave him a grade of "C". America has had enough rhetoric from political hypocrites and corporate puppets. Stay on TV and stop "acting" like you're a conservative you fraud.
My trips to the range are so routine that it's never considered an "event" or an "appearance". When I ran for Lt. Governor of Ohio in 2006, my opponents made big shows of taking the class to obtain a concealed handgun permit. It was never mentioned that my wife and I, as NRA Pistol Instructors, were qualified to teach the class. Compare Fred to Ron Paul on gun issues.
Glad to see another loyal American get involved Mark...Thank you.
I know Freds position on the Second by checking several sources and as a certified Law Enforcement Firearms Instructor, who doesn't take a back seat to anyone on the entire Bill of Rights, my opinion is that Fred is so far and above Paul on ALL subjects that there is no comparison possible.
Where Paul believes in isolationism, legalizing drugs and is on the fringe on so many other subjects I hardly know where to begin.
Fred did give a non-answer, but you have to feel that he definitely supports Second Amendment rights.
Ever get the feeling that you're watching history in the making? No matter if you like him or not, he definitely will make an impact on the upcoming race and at least his party's platform.
I definitely agree with you. On both sides the candidate that is strongest with their base will be the front runner. It's just where America is going, in that both parties are becoming more and more divided. Unfortunately most of the current candidates and either anti-gun or leaning that way. I hope Fred changes that, but I think he will.
This has been flagged as spam show
Thompson is raking in donations. Please add YOURS to it, today! FRED08(dot)com
Huckabee is dangerous and would destroy the Republican party as we've known it to be....
egginanest 4 years ago
Freedom and Liberty!!! Fred Thompson for President!!!
newyorknaked 4 years ago
This obvious liar reminds me a lot of George W. Bush. Can't talk straight on an issue. Can't look at you straight in the eye. Hum hum my lines, my lines. Don't let the controlled media decide for you. Apathy and ignorance are the tools of fools who are headed for complete slavery. This great nation is founded on the principle of LIBERTY. Look it up and become Ron Paul!
PGAJAMIE411 4 years ago
i totally agree, this guy is pure 100% phoney bullshit who will use fear, patriotism , and religion to win an election, but not actual plans and ideas.
zlatanstanic 4 years ago
Rudy Giuliani not working New York New York!!
I would vote for Thompson then Paul!
stormz7675454 4 years ago
Giuliani and Romney were both draft dodgers.
copy paste copy paste...get the word out before it's too late!
rpforliberty2008 4 years ago
This guy is an ACTOR people. He has voted against guns in the senate. He is a member of CFR who try to take guns away from Americans. Wake up here!!!!
trueamericanron 4 years ago 3
fake TV characters shouldn't run for president
hairhorn 4 years ago
your states constitution is the only thing that allows you to have a gun!
fefu23 4 years ago
Hey Fred,
As a member of Gun Owners of America I know you voted against GOA 14 times as a sorry senator; after taking our money no less.
YOU SUCK!
RON PAUL 2008
AnAppealToHeavenWash 4 years ago
AnAppealToHeavenWash 4 years ago
Hmmm looks like congressman Paul has more first, second and third place finishes than anyone, including the "frontrunners." The media lies and lies to you. Ignorance and apathy are no excuse for becoming a complete slave, but they do cause it.
Ron Paul for president!
PGAJAMIE411 4 years ago 2
These CFR globalists,ultimately, don't want us to have guns. How can they have NWO if we can resist? Fred is as fake as the rest. We don't need an actor,we need a leader who cares about our heritage. RON PAUL
savageUSA 4 years ago 4
You guys are just as nutty as Ron.
internalfusion 4 years ago
Ron Paul is about 200 times better than Thompson...
SeppLainer 4 years ago
Ron Paul treats the Constitution as though it was perfect. Even the framers themselves, know that the Constitution is nowhere near perfection. Also, the framers meant to allow for the Constitution's interpretations to change with society, Ron Paul seems to disregard this. Dr. Paul thinks that we should interpret the constitution as if we lived in the 18th century.
Steinway101 4 years ago
Do you think we do not have the same domestic threats as in the 18th century?
SeppLainer 4 years ago 2
Is taking away constitutional rights,ok,just as long as it's during the war on terror?Simply because we live in the 21st century? Herr Hitler was just over 65 years ago, he gained power legally, then said his constitution was outdated, and did not represent the current threat to Germany,and so it was "quaint". I think most of us,who can actually point to the U.S. on a map, knows what happened next. All in the name of SAVING Deutschland from the Bolshevik terrorists...
SeppLainer 4 years ago 2
I am huge supporter of the Constitution. And yes, Bush has pretty much done everything short of ripping up the constitution itself. But, keeping the same interpretation as the 1700's is like pretending that we still live in the 1700's. No, our domestic threats are much, much different. Think of all the technological advances and social changes.
Steinway101 4 years ago
Please divulge the information as to how the President has ripped up the constitution? I dont know if any of you took history or government...or for that matter READ the constitution. But only Congress can change the constitution (if approved by the states of course) - not the President.
internalfusion 4 years ago
2
No constitution rights should definitely not be taken away. And don't you think it's a little hypocritical that Dr. Paul is the biggest advocate for small, no tiny government, but he also wants the government to intervene and stop a woman's right to choose? And, no I am not talking about drafting or even changing the constitution, just its interpretation, to move it up to the 21st century.
Steinway101 4 years ago
WHAT? YOU ARE MISINFORMED. Ron Paul says it's the states' decision, not the Federal Governments. I think you may have misinterpreted "state". While he is personally against it, he does NOT think the federal government should intervene with a "woman's right to choose"...
SeppLainer 4 years ago
The reason abortions are legal is because the federal government decided that a human fetus is not a "Person". What if the federal government decides that blacks aren't people? Would you support white people "Having the right to choose" if blacks live or die? It's not about abortions; Ron Paul doesn't support the government classifying who is a person and who isn't, and it's sad that you do Steinway101.
c0unterph0bia 4 years ago
I think that's the worst analogy I've ever heard. So if you're prolife, you believe that the baby should be born even if the woman was raped, or she will die at birth. That's like forgetting about all the people who die from gun violence, just to support guns, oh wait you probably do that anyway. Kucinich 08
Steinway101 4 years ago
If your only concern is with rape and medical problems, then why do we kill 1.37 million living human fetus's per year when less than 13,700 of them are from rape, and less than 82,200 even classify as causing a POTENTIAL health risk? And this stupid gun argument you make, what about all the people that die in cars and pools, have you ever considered that? And what's this, you don't support the 2nd amendment because of gun violence? What's your stance on knifes and knife violence?
c0unterph0bia 4 years ago
The Second Amendment guarantees the First Amendment. Your right to bear arms is about guarding against tyranny - not hunting. The Republican and Democratic Parties have taken increasingly tyrannical positions - especially this latest President Bush. I don't see Fred Thompson standing up against the "unitary executive" theories espoused by the current President, so I have no trust in his pandering to "the Second Amendment crowd".
jeremiahp 4 years ago
God he's ugly.
PAAL323 4 years ago
Duncan Hunter is the candidate of choice for conservatives. View Thompson's record on amnesties at Americans for Better Immigration. Thompson voted for an amnesty to illegal aliens from Nicaragua and Cuba. Sen. Thompson voted for a procedural move that helped allow the Mack Amendment to be included in S.1156. This amendment granted amnesty to illegal aliens from Nicaragua and Cuba and added close to one million people to U.S. population.
conservativegrunt 4 years ago
He rented a red pickup to look like "just one of the boys" sometype of washington outsider. Hes FAKE WAKE UP PEOPLE!!
shooter6575 4 years ago
Fredagogue is not so hot on the 1st amendment, while luke-warm at best on gun rights. Gunowner dot org details his positions on the guns.
qoute:
Gun owners should also be aware that Thompson unabashedly favors the odious McCain-Feingold Incumbent Protection Act. This legislation, characterized by its proponents as campaign finance reform, severely limits the abilities of groups like GOA to inform the public about the gun rights voting records of politicians already in office."
rijderunner 4 years ago
On his first interview with Mike Wallace, Fred said straight out that Mc-F "did not work as designed"...Look it up. Fred was the first real Rep. we've had that tried to actually do something about the purchase of politicians. If jerks like McCain and Feingold stayed out of it, it wouldn't have gone sideways.
Fred bargained to raise the limit of hard money on Mc-F, that's it.
Go back to what I'll laughingly refer to as your research.
ChipsBirds 4 years ago
Fred Thompson is a hypocrite. We would not have 12 to 20 million illegals if he would not have contributed to an "open borders" immigration when he was in the Senate. This is why Americans for Better Immigration gave him a grade of "C". America has had enough rhetoric from political hypocrites and corporate puppets. Stay on TV and stop "acting" like you're a conservative you fraud.
gchuggins 4 years ago
My trips to the range are so routine that it's never considered an "event" or an "appearance". When I ran for Lt. Governor of Ohio in 2006, my opponents made big shows of taking the class to obtain a concealed handgun permit. It was never mentioned that my wife and I, as NRA Pistol Instructors, were qualified to teach the class. Compare Fred to Ron Paul on gun issues.
marknoble76 4 years ago
Glad to see another loyal American get involved Mark...Thank you.
I know Freds position on the Second by checking several sources and as a certified Law Enforcement Firearms Instructor, who doesn't take a back seat to anyone on the entire Bill of Rights, my opinion is that Fred is so far and above Paul on ALL subjects that there is no comparison possible.
Where Paul believes in isolationism, legalizing drugs and is on the fringe on so many other subjects I hardly know where to begin.
ChipsBirds 4 years ago
I like Fred, although I'd be much happier with a direct answer regarding his stance on the 2nd Amendment and gun control.
ResponsibleGunOwner 4 years ago
Fred did give a non-answer, but you have to feel that he definitely supports Second Amendment rights.
Ever get the feeling that you're watching history in the making? No matter if you like him or not, he definitely will make an impact on the upcoming race and at least his party's platform.
oneslickjackrabbit 4 years ago
I definitely agree with you. On both sides the candidate that is strongest with their base will be the front runner. It's just where America is going, in that both parties are becoming more and more divided. Unfortunately most of the current candidates and either anti-gun or leaning that way. I hope Fred changes that, but I think he will.
rwbazillion 4 years ago