Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (23)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • if you guys drafted Tebow and got rid of Del rio sooner, Atleast the jags would have been a popular team and on the way to being good.

  • @xTheNIL8Rx That is so true Tebow would make them some money enough to get them motivated atleast 

  • 1:31 lol cowboy failed tackle.

  • EXTREMELY Underrated....

  • @RarelyEvenn No he isn't. He is washed up and never fully took advantage of the opportunities given him.

  • @gb6710 So, You found another video I commented on... and replied.

  • @RarelyEvenn I just don't think he is as good as you think he is. There is a reason why he was cut.

  • @gb6710 Okay, I'll be happy to discuss this with you if you'll actually have a conversation.

    He wasn't given any good receivers with the exception of Marcedes Lewis, and he took time to develop. The head coach was a moron, I just think if he's given a chance, given the right weapons, and the right coach, he can be really good. Doug Williams-esque

  • @RarelyEvenn No, there have been several QBs who've succeeded, even winning a Super Bowl, without big play receivers. For example, Tom Brady and Brett Favre. He isn't the QB that will make other players better. And Del Rio wasn't a moron, he was a good defensive coach. What ruined him was his and the GM's drafting and reluctance to go into free agency.

  • @gb6710 Not taking anything away from Tom Brady, because the guy is great. He had and still has a great coaching staff. He had a good defense in the early 2000's. Tedy Bruschi, Lawyer Milloy, Willie McGinnest to name a few. I'm not saying the D was the whole team, but Drew Bledsoe never had that good of a defense to work with, hence him having an NFL record 70 passing attempts in a game. Defense wins championships. Favre had good receivers in his day. Sharpe, Freeman, Driver, etc.

  • @RarelyEvenn True, the Pats had a good defense at the time, but Tom Brady raised the level of play for those receivers. He put the ball, as did Favre, in a position that only the Receivers could catch. I don't think that Garrard has that ability. He could be good if he is surrounded by All-Pro talent, but I doubt he ever will. When it comes down to it, he is the reason he failed because the ball was in his hands.

  • @gb6710 That's kind of unfair. Can you name one bonafide wide receiver this guy has played with with the exception of Jimmy Smith? I sure as hell can't. All he had was a running game. While all of his receivers were in the wrong spot and running improper routes.

  • @RarelyEvenn But the Jags have drafted in the hopes of improving the offense. Sure, the Jags could have done a better job, but that is only with hindsight, at the time quite a lot of people thought their offensive picks were great. But like you said, if he was put into a situation with all pro talent, yes he could succeed. But I don't think he is an elite talent, or even a Top 15 QB. And the only receiver they have that had any real chance to succeed is probably Mike Sims-Walker.

  • @RarelyEvenn But he is his own down fall because of his work ethic and attitude.

  • @gb6710 work ethic??? what a joke he never had a problem with work ethic Jack del rio never mention anything about that. Garrard was the whole team he was the glue that kept them together Mercedes Lewis was devasted when garrard left. They said Luke Mcown had a better preason but that's because he was playing against 3rd stringers people who aren't good enough to make teams and usually don't sign anywhere thats why he did good BRING BACK GARRARD 2012

  • i want to see him wearing black and silver

  • Raiders may be needing this mans services?

  • Love It!

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more