Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (27)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • you have to hit the biggest hooks with that swing

  • @schmitty3100 They go straight or with a slight draw.

  • for left

  • @catfordboy My ball goes long and straight.

  • That would be the same swing even if you held onto the club to the finish!

  • @bunglebear85 Then why is it that baseball players release the top hand in their baseball swing? It creates a bigger arc. I feel the same thing about my unusual golf swing.

  • Releasing it passed impact won't make a difference.

    We WANT TO SEE LAUNCH MONITOR STATS.

    WITH A 44 inch driver and no lead tape on the back and top.

  • I LIKE THE WAY U KEEP IT POSITIVE. IS YOUR AVERAGE SHOTS IRONS AND WOODS ARE THE ACCURATE?

  • @hogi90 Yes, my irons are very accurate even with the one handed release. Thanks for your comments. _Hammmer

  • I can see you reversed the image in the edit. The patch of dirt in front of the tee obviously moves from the right side then to the left, and so do the buildings in the background. You also have some paper in your rear pocket switches sides when you flipped the image. You've got a cool swing bro, but don't lie about being ambidextrous when you clearly edited (poorly) to look make it like you were hitting from both sides.

    .

  • I am very ambidextrous, so I need not lie about it. In fact if you do some research on me (plenty of news paper and magazine clips) and check out my channel and you will see how I train by using mirror imaging. I reversed the video here so that I can study my right handed mechanics. There are videos were I hit left handed and then flip it over to appear as a right hander. However, I will reedit the information to avoid further misunderstanding. Hammer

  • With your hand eye coordination you should swing like Happy Gilmore on your drives. The added foward momentum into your swing should add 35 yards to your drive. And your music has an interesting old-school feel to it, its nice.

  • Even with great hand eye coordination doing the Happy Gilmore style would not be worth the risk. There is nice reward when you hit it square but any miss and you are out of bounds and this kills your score. If you check out my other videos I have a method where I pick up my leg like a baseball pitcher and get really good distance and can hit it pretty accurately. Thanks for the comment about the music. It's on my golf album.

  • Learning to be ambidextrous certainly had its risk, but once learned, reaped great benefits. The Happy Gilmore swing is the same way. Once learned the swing should add many yards to your drive.

    Now I understand it might take a while, "It took nearly three to four years of

    serving left-handed two to three times weekly with a bucket of balls to be

    able to reach the same level of tennis play that I was playing right-handed in

    previous years"

  • It is a novel concept, Michael, but it could never work. Tennis is meant to be played only one way. Its a game with a forehand and a backhand.I took that as a challenge".

    People can say that a golf club is meant to be swung from a stand still and that Happy Gilmore could never work, but take it as a challenge

  • When I tried the two ball shooting, two handed writing, and my treadmil drills I messed up all of them, but I never let that stop me from learning how to do them.

  • EJ, I challenge you to show us how you can hit the Happy Gilmore style with perfect percision. Your two hand shooting is impressive and your ability to multi task is awesome too. Now that you have conquered those aspects of the ambidextrous training you should push the envelope and show us how fast that you can learn tennis and golf ambidextrously. Take it as a challenge. You are only 16 and you should be able to master these games with your incredible brain power that you have developed. Hammer

  • the golf part might be a little tricky since I have never taken a cut, I've never been by a course, nor do I live by one. However I will keep on working to play tennis ambidextrously

  • EJ, Now is the time to challenge yourself and get over to a golf driving range. It would be a humbling experience at first. But you would start to get the hang of it. So not living by a golf course should not be a problem that you can not solve. Find a golfing buddy who wants to train with your brain improvement methods. As the tennis is concerned it would be great to see your stroke mechanics on video so that we can see just how you are applying yourself to the disciplines that you prescribe.

  • I'll make sure the ambidextrous tennis and golf clips are in my next Black Da Vinci video

  • That is a quote from Dr. Craig McQueen who wrote the forward to my book. Those are not my words. I can hit just as far if not further using my method. If you think that you can prove that Happy Gilmore style can go further than my methods by all means show us the way. I appreciate your enthusiasm and your proven skills that you display on your posts but you have yet to post your ambidextrous tennis skills, or playing basketball in competition. However, I love the way you challenge the system.

  • You said "I can hit just as far if not further using my method" but you also said

    "There is nice reward when you hit it square" I guess I was wrong to assume the reward is a longer drive, so what were you referring to when you said a "nice reward"

  • I have tried to do Happy Gilmore style for length but even if I square it up perfectly I can not hit it as far as with my other techniques.

  • by the way, how many "great athletes" have you turned into "legends". is roger federer or michael jordan or tiger woods a subscriber to the whole brain power system? what a complete crock.

  • They are already established so they do not need this program. You have not investigated my Whole Brain Power program so you are entitled to your opinion. When ambidextrous tennis players begin to break through it will prove that my methods work. Pat Venditte is a perfect case of the paradigm shift that is happening in sports training. His talents are the basis of dedication and his numbers are quite impressive. After all he is the first successful professional ambidextous pitcher in history.

  • no offense but Venditte cant break 90 off of either side and he hasn't even played outside of the minors

    I wouldn't consider that impressive or successful

  • You do not know what you are talking about. He has been clocked at 93 mph this year right handed. Plus, he is the most ambidextrous pitcher in the history of the game. His strikeout to walk ratio is the best in the minors. ESPN would not have done a story on him if he was not impressive or successful.

  • 93 mph right handed = average (but he can only do this on one side) fastball speed for the big leagues

    Now I'm not doubting that being ambidextrous could be a benefit in the future, but being the most ambidextrous pitcher right now doesn't mean anything if he cant even make it to the big leagues.

  • ESPN did a story on him because he is unique and it makes for good ratings. Like I said, once this "620th pick in the draft single-A pitcher" can make it to the leagues then I'll jump on board with this ambidexterity thing youve got going on

  • Venditte is certainly inspiring lots of kids to practice ambidextrous training with their pitching. So in that he is creating a bit of a revolution. Just reverse engineer the whole process. Ambidextrous pitching at the professional level, even at the minor league level was unheard of and now people are fascinated. Watch the interview of Venditte and listen to his pitching coach and what he would do if it was up to him. Venditte would get promoted. Wheteher you jump on board does not matter.

  • It does mean something because it represents change and potential. People have been trying suppress inovation for centuries. Do a little bit of research on the history of baseball and realize that switch hitting was once frowned upon until the likes of Mickey Mantle.

  • what a retarded "breakthrough". if you want shoulder trouble, then by all means do it.

  • Why don't you send this "amazing comment" to about 85% of all the home run hitters in major league baseball. They seem to release their top hand with no problem at all to their shoulder. You might reconsider sending your "retarded" comment. Hammer

  • yes because the golf swing is exactly like the baseball swing and the bat is exactly the same weight and weight distribution as a golf club. god why didn't i think of that.

    why don't you send your comment to 100% of pga tour pros who don't release their hands at the top, retard.

  • thought id also say i like your swing reminds me of John Daly looks nice too

  • i dont care about how it looks wither aslong as it works for you mate i was just saying it isnt really what i expect but i want meaning to try and criticize becauses im sure your a far better golfer than me

  • thatsnot one handed

  • It is a one handed release golf swing. Just as a baseball player will do. I am hitting the ball with two hands and then the right hand comes off the club and thus a bigger arc is achieved on the follow through. It works extremely well for my game. I really do not have concerns about what others think because it's the results that matter. Hammer

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more