Re: The Atheist Challenge: from a theist to you!

[Danni4815162342]

Dude your irises are white/blue, and shit, there square too!

Come on man, are you a alien or demon or some shit like that?

PS, I'm with you on your thoughts on all this, thanks for the post.

[hotflame2006]

"You're an idiot, case closed."

Yep, you are a typical atheist who has to start throwing insults at those who are on the other side of the argument.

And fossils don't prove evolution to be true. If there was billions of years of evolution, then why aren't there trillions of transitional fossils? Where are the fossils of fish with legs? Also, why do scientists keep finding these "billion" year old fossils that are identical to animals who are alive today?

[JesseJesse]

the screen glowing on your glasses makes you look like you've got some glowing eyes. crraaazzziii..

What would take more faith?

To believe that a creater created the universe.

Or that evolution took place.

Because, neither can be seen today, and neither can really be proved.

Both do take faith, but which takes more?

[XOmniverse]

"Because, neither can be seen today, and neither can really be proved."

Only someone seeing the world with eyes clouded by irrational superstition or someone with a complete lack of scientific interest or knowledge would make such a claim about evolution with a straight face. Evolution can be seen today and has been pretty thoroughly proven at this point.

[hotflame2006]

Oh, so you have seen a small puddle of goo turn into a fish, which then turned into a lizard, which turned into an ape, which then turned into us? Unless you are referring to "micro-evolution", but that's not what I would consider true evolution, because an animal adapting to a climate or environment change is not the same as an animal turning into an entirely different species altogether.

[XOmniverse]

There is no difference between micro-evolution and macro-evolution other than the time alloted. It's mainly religious types that try to make them seem inherently different somehow.

Besides, if you believe that a magic man in the sky made everything, you're in no position to demand "proof" from anyone regarding their viewpoint.

[hotflame2006]

You cannot tell me that micro-evolution and macro-evolution are the same thing because you have never seen macro-evolution take place. If the size of a bird's beak, or the length of its feathers changes to match a new environment...how does that prove that the bird will change into an entirely different type of animal altogether after a few million years? It doesn't, you just assume it does. That's called FAITH, not proof. You are in the same boat as creationists.

[XOmniverse]

It takes a long time for "macro-evolution" to occur. Any experiments carried out would take far longer than the lifetime of those starting it.

We can, however, look at the vast amount of evidence of what has occurred in the past, through study of fossils. It's clear when looking at that evidence that species became more complex over time.

And I hate to break it to you, but drawing a conclusion based on available evidence is not faith. You're an idiot, case closed.