@monviolondingue : L'âme et la sensibilité sont déjà dans la musique. Il me semble que le meilleur moyen de les rendre, c'est de servir tout simplement la musique - de Mozart en l'occurrence - sans chercher à rajouter de son propre affect, ce que fait merveilleusement Hilary Hahn qui joue, en effet, d'une façon pouvant paraître inhumaine - mais surhumaine, comme celle d'un ange, et non pas sous-humaine, comme celle d'une machine!
Can i say something irrelevant here? i really like how she did (or someone did for her) her hair this night. i mean looking from the back, so totally cute.
By the way, i hope some internet-trained critics stop pretending that they just arrived from 18th century - and if Mozart had the luck travelling to our century, I'm sure he would love HIlary Hahn even more than we do.
@ginsuchop100 Yes, I suppose unHIP performances are favored by old people who long for the good ole day of the clueless performance.
By "gypsy technique" I was referring to the relentless vibrato favored by gypsies and restaurant violinists.
"There are some players who tremble at every note, as if they had a chronic fever. One should use the tremolo (vibrato) only in those places where Nature herself would produce it." - Leopold Mozart
@1banders I've met old, middle age, young, and very young people on both sides of the fence. Age has very little to do with HIP preference.
HIP is no more/less valid a means of interpretation than any other. It does have a very outspoken contingent which is why it gets so much debate/prominence but that has more to do with politics, intolerance and bullying from HIP fanatics than simply making music.
@ginsuchop100 Age has very much to do with it HIP preference. Old people tend to prefer the old unHIP way. The young people you refer to are either cluless or brainwashed by teachers schooled in the clueless unHIP manner. "Simply music making" is just code for "clueless is ok" or for indulging the musical aesthetics of late romantiscm. To say HIP no more valid is like saying music of all periods follows the same aesthetic.
@ginsuchop100 You have no provable point. You have only bold assertions. I could just as easily assert that unHIP has a very outspoken contingent and you are part of it. My own statements merely called a spade a spade. That is neither bullying, intolerance, nor politics. There can be no "debate" unless both sides participate. If HIP gets "prominence", it's only because it has both musical & musicological justification. UnHIP has none, save the sheer willfulness of its (mostly elderly) advocates.
@viharsarok HIP is an acronym for "historically informed performance," which refers a performance that takes into account period performance practices, such as bowing, articulation, phrasing, dynamics, ornamentation and tempo. A HIP could use modern instruments, but typically uses period instruments. Hence, unHIP = "historically uninformed performance.".
@1banders I do not want "historically informed performances", me wants modern performance with modern instruments and much better sound quality than was possible before. Else we still would play on stone-age African bush-drums. What would the composers have given for better musical instruments at their time!
@MucusFelidae Modern instruments do not sound better. And they're not really modern. They're mostly 19th century.instruments, adapted to the musical aesthetics of the 19th c. concert audience. The so-called "Stradivarius" Baroque violins that some modern violinsits claim to own would be unrecognizable, in sound, to the maker, due mostly to the ugly sounding metal strings & anchronistic bow and bowing, and ugly vibrato.
I think she is great at violin, the only thing I would change of her is that she plays all the pieces too romantic, for example in this, that is a classical one and bach too (it's baroque)...but other than that she is great :) (sorry for my English)
@b3b3t1t4 If pressed I would say I prefer more "historically informed" playing but today when everyone and their mother is doing just that, I'm quite glad to have a Hilary Hahn to listen to as well!
@toyouall Do you compare Mozart with Paganini??? With all my respect for Niccolò, but it's a blasphemy what you say....... There's no genius like Mozart, he's the only one...........!
The conductor sure is having a good time :D
ChanelCoco555 1 day ago
@monviolondingue : L'âme et la sensibilité sont déjà dans la musique. Il me semble que le meilleur moyen de les rendre, c'est de servir tout simplement la musique - de Mozart en l'occurrence - sans chercher à rajouter de son propre affect, ce que fait merveilleusement Hilary Hahn qui joue, en effet, d'une façon pouvant paraître inhumaine - mais surhumaine, comme celle d'un ange, et non pas sous-humaine, comme celle d'une machine!
DAngeloMarc 2 days ago
For me is the will to live and enjoy life
dekzan 3 days ago
Happy Birthday Mozart! Love this concerto, especially this movement.
amadeus5889 1 month ago
good
sanclspbr1 2 months ago
Malgré sa virtuosité, je n'apprécie pas le jeu d'Hilary Hahn sans âme ni sensibilité. Une belle petite poupée mécanique !
monviolondingue 2 months ago
Comment removed
ginsuchop100 3 months ago
her...shifting.. is PERFECT
ThatAsianAcrossTheSt 5 months ago
GREAT, AMAZING I LOVE THIS. AND ALL HER CONCERTS.
yoshikosan127 6 months ago
Mozart is wonderful to listen to...so full of beautiful light energies. My soul soars with each note ♥
Goldenwaves1 6 months ago
Fantastic.
Videogamerfan1441 7 months ago
Can i say something irrelevant here? i really like how she did (or someone did for her) her hair this night. i mean looking from the back, so totally cute.
By the way, i hope some internet-trained critics stop pretending that they just arrived from 18th century - and if Mozart had the luck travelling to our century, I'm sure he would love HIlary Hahn even more than we do.
krystianji 8 months ago
BEAUTIFUL EXCELLENT ALL TIME
carlosijr2008 8 months ago
I like the so-called historically informed playing too, but I much prefer listening to Hilary's Mozart & Bach.
ginsuchop100 10 months ago
@ginsuchop100 Oh, so you prefer the so-called historically uninformed performance, with gypsy violin technique and shrill metal strings.
1banders 3 months ago
@1banders Yep I do. Btw gypsy violin technique is quite different from this, and it's great as well.
ginsuchop100 3 months ago
@ginsuchop100 Yes, I suppose unHIP performances are favored by old people who long for the good ole day of the clueless performance.
By "gypsy technique" I was referring to the relentless vibrato favored by gypsies and restaurant violinists.
"There are some players who tremble at every note, as if they had a chronic fever. One should use the tremolo (vibrato) only in those places where Nature herself would produce it." - Leopold Mozart
1banders 3 months ago
@1banders I've met old, middle age, young, and very young people on both sides of the fence. Age has very little to do with HIP preference.
HIP is no more/less valid a means of interpretation than any other. It does have a very outspoken contingent which is why it gets so much debate/prominence but that has more to do with politics, intolerance and bullying from HIP fanatics than simply making music.
ginsuchop100 3 months ago
Comment removed
1banders 3 months ago
@ginsuchop100 Age has very much to do with it HIP preference. Old people tend to prefer the old unHIP way. The young people you refer to are either cluless or brainwashed by teachers schooled in the clueless unHIP manner. "Simply music making" is just code for "clueless is ok" or for indulging the musical aesthetics of late romantiscm. To say HIP no more valid is like saying music of all periods follows the same aesthetic.
1banders 3 months ago
@1banders Thanks for proving my point. In any case we'll agree to disagree.
ginsuchop100 3 months ago
@ginsuchop100 You have no provable point. You have only bold assertions. I could just as easily assert that unHIP has a very outspoken contingent and you are part of it. My own statements merely called a spade a spade. That is neither bullying, intolerance, nor politics. There can be no "debate" unless both sides participate. If HIP gets "prominence", it's only because it has both musical & musicological justification. UnHIP has none, save the sheer willfulness of its (mostly elderly) advocates.
1banders 3 months ago
@1banders What is "HIP"?
viharsarok 2 months ago
@viharsarok HIP is an acronym for "historically informed performance," which refers a performance that takes into account period performance practices, such as bowing, articulation, phrasing, dynamics, ornamentation and tempo. A HIP could use modern instruments, but typically uses period instruments. Hence, unHIP = "historically uninformed performance.".
1banders 2 months ago
@1banders Thanks for the explanation.
viharsarok 2 months ago
@1banders I do not want "historically informed performances", me wants modern performance with modern instruments and much better sound quality than was possible before. Else we still would play on stone-age African bush-drums. What would the composers have given for better musical instruments at their time!
MucusFelidae 2 weeks ago
@MucusFelidae Modern instruments do not sound better. And they're not really modern. They're mostly 19th century.instruments, adapted to the musical aesthetics of the 19th c. concert audience. The so-called "Stradivarius" Baroque violins that some modern violinsits claim to own would be unrecognizable, in sound, to the maker, due mostly to the ugly sounding metal strings & anchronistic bow and bowing, and ugly vibrato.
1banders 2 weeks ago
@1banders 'Gypsy violin technique'; thank you for this!
dolofonos 2 months ago
Played very beautifully but I would prefer it to be a bit slower.
jayaaron1 11 months ago
Chills all over my body, she's fantastic!!! And I will forever love Mozart.
icarrus4u 1 year ago
I think she is great at violin, the only thing I would change of her is that she plays all the pieces too romantic, for example in this, that is a classical one and bach too (it's baroque)...but other than that she is great :) (sorry for my English)
b3b3t1t4 1 year ago
@b3b3t1t4 If pressed I would say I prefer more "historically informed" playing but today when everyone and their mother is doing just that, I'm quite glad to have a Hilary Hahn to listen to as well!
panchamkauns 11 months ago
I love anyone playing the violin well. I tend ton consider them a teacher.
dozemix 1 year ago
@toyouall Do you compare Mozart with Paganini??? With all my respect for Niccolò, but it's a blasphemy what you say....... There's no genius like Mozart, he's the only one...........!
MrThepresident2009 1 year ago
Comment removed
semperwifi1 1 year ago
2:33 wrong!!!!!!!
classicalmusic1000 1 year ago
Wonderful!!!!
Danofnj 1 year ago
I never ceased to be amazed by Hilary's playing. So crisp, clear, flawless, and with impeccable intonation.
TheTucsonJeff 1 year ago 14
Love mozart and hilary hahn
enooxx 1 year ago 7
argh! memory slip at 2.33 phew lol
redviolinistuk 1 year ago
She definitely has the 'signature' Hiliary Hahn spirit.........
Mozart is not Paganini unfortunately..........
toyouall 1 year ago
LOvely playing!!!!!!!!!!!!!11
hartistry 1 year ago 2