So, I've watched most of your latest vids and I conclude from these that there are triangular shaped spaceships, blue ghosts, green smokey plants and spaceworms emitting light, ALL around and on our moon? Oh boy aint that exciting
I love all your videos but there seems to be what i believe is an error in one of your conclusions. Toward the end of the video when u talk about the completely black photo you say that the object must be the same size of the crater. But after you say it must be flying above the moon which i agree with. But if it is closer to the camera (since its above the moons surface) and appears to be the same size it must be smaller than the crater. Keep up the great videos
You have to understand that these pictures were not digital pictures, but film pictures, which were then skanned into digital. <- the copy was not perfect and they possibly edited it. There will always remain some inperfections that can be found using those filtering techniques. Even if the photos have been edited afterwards to make them look better in high resolution, it doesnt mean that the event is faked. There is plenty of undeniable proof supporting the event. Still and intresting video.
Hi there, I do not question the event, as I believe that we went to the moon. I do however question the photomaterial NASA shows us. Too many photos have been altered, tampered with. So it is not the moonlanding itself I have my doubts about.
@1967sander You are able to photograph them, but their disturbings will only appear when using the software. It is impossible to photograph a perfect black sky on the Moon.
Hi sander, I've watched all your vids and they're great, have you used your software on this Apollo image yet? Because this has to be the strangest I have seen so far /watch?v=cM5oIzHFQX8
Hello, I watched the video. I honestly must admit that I do not think that the moonlanding was faked. Nevertheless an interesting theory and food for thought.
Great video but have a question, at 10:03 you Windows 7 task bar shows up and it shows the date of 5/1/2012? Curious why you have your date set in the future.
Excellent presentation, articulate. What kind of program are you using to change contrast, invert, etc? There is a wonderful texture at 10:55...! Thanks.
Experimental software originally designed for medical purposes now re-designed for digital forensics: it is called AMS-D. It uses special processing techniques which can enhance contrast variations on pixel level in 2D images and also increase / decrease contrast for single pixels between layers when you have a multiple layer image.
try to manipulate / anaylse an new highres-photo shooten by the newly started Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Camera (LROC) in order to proof the manipulation for example of the first photo. maybe there is also a manipulation at the landing sight.
Wonderful analysis and explanations..this should impel anyone interested in this subject to go out and also take a closer look at anything that comes their way in the form of photography be in on Mars, Moon, or even here on earth!
No Mars is not yet part of my investigations but I have seen a lot of interesting anomalies in the Marsian sky on photos from Opportunity and the Rover, I will definitely have a closer look.
@1967sander ...please do!..and if you are not already familiar with the work of mr.skipper may i suggest you go to marsanomalyresearch for some interesting material
Hello, have you seen the clementine moon photos where the stuctures are blurred out? JP Skipper has them on his site.. could you work your magic on them do you think??
imo, you and JP Skipper could make a formidable team. keep up the great work
Yes, these pictures are some of my favorites. The problems with these pictures is that high compression was used after the editing. The manipulation was not done by paintbrush but via "mosaicing". Putting the pieces of the mosaic back in place is undoable. With my software I will hardly be able to re-create the original shapes.
Hi Sander,extremely revealing and valuable work.have you ever had an opportunity or the time to review Mars imaging in the same forensic way?keep up the good work
Long time no see... thank you 1967sander for another great presentation!
These photos are full of surprises, we thank you for enlightening us further, at least we keep consistently knowing the huge lengths NASA went to with their picture manipulation.
Good stuff, i always enjoy your videos! I find this kind of subject fascinating. Besides using the software that you use, are there any other ones you would suggest using? Photoshop is probably good for that im not sure, ive never used it that much actually.
the artifacts on photo 1 are a sign of a clone and drag editing tool
digitalenigma00 3 days ago
So, I've watched most of your latest vids and I conclude from these that there are triangular shaped spaceships, blue ghosts, green smokey plants and spaceworms emitting light, ALL around and on our moon? Oh boy aint that exciting
trybenga 3 weeks ago in playlist Meer video's van 1967sander
Sander, Can you put the URLs of these images in the describtion box??.. Great video btw!
simJ94 3 weeks ago in playlist More videos from 1967sander
brother the truth is comming soon...its been a festering pimple since roswell...and its about to bust wide open...
JDPackard 1 month ago
Thanks for this great video !
TheAelfymade 1 month ago
I love all your videos but there seems to be what i believe is an error in one of your conclusions. Toward the end of the video when u talk about the completely black photo you say that the object must be the same size of the crater. But after you say it must be flying above the moon which i agree with. But if it is closer to the camera (since its above the moons surface) and appears to be the same size it must be smaller than the crater. Keep up the great videos
canabal72994 1 month ago
@canabal72994
Yes, you are right about that. Good thinking!
1967sander 1 month ago
I should clarify that u actually believe that we went to the moon.
some ppl cant read between the lines.
KasiPee 1 month ago
You have to understand that these pictures were not digital pictures, but film pictures, which were then skanned into digital. <- the copy was not perfect and they possibly edited it. There will always remain some inperfections that can be found using those filtering techniques. Even if the photos have been edited afterwards to make them look better in high resolution, it doesnt mean that the event is faked. There is plenty of undeniable proof supporting the event. Still and intresting video.
Maekiii 1 month ago
@Maekiii
Hi there, I do not question the event, as I believe that we went to the moon. I do however question the photomaterial NASA shows us. Too many photos have been altered, tampered with. So it is not the moonlanding itself I have my doubts about.
1967sander 1 month ago
what more proof do these ignorant people need
css500elite 1 month ago
The scratches are comets and the floating thing is another galexy
firesword1125 1 month ago
Galaxies are too far away to be seen with ordinary camera equipment. The Hasselblad cameras were unable to photograph this kind of objects.
1967sander 1 month ago
@1967sander You are able to photograph them, but their disturbings will only appear when using the software. It is impossible to photograph a perfect black sky on the Moon.
firesword1125 1 month ago
THANKYOU for providing the TRUTH.
whydontyouwork 1 month ago
Hi sander, I've watched all your vids and they're great, have you used your software on this Apollo image yet? Because this has to be the strangest I have seen so far /watch?v=cM5oIzHFQX8
MrSkyblueworld 1 month ago
FOR THE UPLOADER! you must see this /watch?v=O1xytPs-ZRI
Mutumaniac 1 month ago
@Mutumaniac
Hello, I watched the video. I honestly must admit that I do not think that the moonlanding was faked. Nevertheless an interesting theory and food for thought.
1967sander 1 month ago
Im so excited to watch!!!
myevilprophecy 1 month ago
excelent job ! ;)
kachibachen 1 month ago
Great video but have a question, at 10:03 you Windows 7 task bar shows up and it shows the date of 5/1/2012? Curious why you have your date set in the future.
thanks,
nfgrachanin3 1 month ago
@nfgrachanin3
I finished the editing of the video on the 5th of january 2012. The video was also uploaded on that same day. What is so strange about that?
1967sander 1 month ago 2
@1967sander My mistake, I was looking at the format in the US with the month first and date second, 1/5/2012 - 5/1/2012
nfgrachanin3 1 month ago
@nfgrachanin3 I'd like to know why and how you managed to even notice that? And did you check the upload date when you decided to write that message?
MrSkyblueworld 1 month ago
Excellent presentation, articulate. What kind of program are you using to change contrast, invert, etc? There is a wonderful texture at 10:55...! Thanks.
shawnasolito 1 month ago
@shawnasolito
Experimental software originally designed for medical purposes now re-designed for digital forensics: it is called AMS-D. It uses special processing techniques which can enhance contrast variations on pixel level in 2D images and also increase / decrease contrast for single pixels between layers when you have a multiple layer image.
1967sander 1 month ago
I love watching these videos. Very informative! Thanks!
EBkira 1 month ago
Excellent work friend!
thevaporshoppe 1 month ago
wow,good work my view became better. thx sander!
spildaleidodomo 1 month ago
Just proves it was done on a set and the vertical lines are the background to the set.
TheComingEvents2012 1 month ago
Well done!
Reen1411 1 month ago
Love your voice !
MissChilloutMoods 1 month ago
@1967sander
try to manipulate / anaylse an new highres-photo shooten by the newly started Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Camera (LROC) in order to proof the manipulation for example of the first photo. maybe there is also a manipulation at the landing sight.
renewblah 1 month ago
Super video, merci de ces analyses 1967 Sander! Je suis impatiente de voir les suivantes!
MERCI MERCI MERCI!!!
halala2203 1 month ago
Wonderful analysis and explanations..this should impel anyone interested in this subject to go out and also take a closer look at anything that comes their way in the form of photography be in on Mars, Moon, or even here on earth!
oliveroma 1 month ago
i want more.....nice vid btw
chopin999 1 month ago
more more more : )
GiUsEpPe554 1 month ago
Great job. Very good descriptions and explanations. Thank you for taking the time to do this.
shaggietrip 1 month ago
Thanks again Sander!
Inhimillinen 1 month ago
Again you never fail to deliver, thank you for your work, great job. :)
MrSkyblueworld 1 month ago
Another excellent job Sander. Thank you. You are a real pro; looking forward to more of your work!
Flyinhi222 1 month ago
Thanks Sander, really, really interesting, can't wait for the next one :)
fyrefly940 1 month ago
Sander, could this software detect any paranormality too? i mean it would be cool to test it out to see if it captures anything
KohviKruus 1 month ago
Excellent work, thank you!
Ghenghy 1 month ago
Another great video Sander!!! Your films are pretty much instant classics in my opinion... Great presentation and narration.
Your work is as incredible as it is invaluable.. Keep it up please.
TheBrownIntruder 1 month ago
@KohviKruus
Oh well as long as they are as cute as Bumblebee than we do not have to worry.
1967sander 1 month ago
This is quite scary to think whats floating up there... transformers..
KohviKruus 1 month ago
Great work! Enjoyed it, see you next time;)
ghanz135 1 month ago
@MrSchrodingerscat1
No Mars is not yet part of my investigations but I have seen a lot of interesting anomalies in the Marsian sky on photos from Opportunity and the Rover, I will definitely have a closer look.
1967sander 1 month ago
@1967sander ...please do!..and if you are not already familiar with the work of mr.skipper may i suggest you go to marsanomalyresearch for some interesting material
MrSchrodingerscat1 1 month ago
@MrSchrodingerscat1
I know JP Skipper. Even provided him with my material. (When Starfields are Fake)
1967sander 1 month ago
@1967sander
Hello, have you seen the clementine moon photos where the stuctures are blurred out? JP Skipper has them on his site.. could you work your magic on them do you think??
imo, you and JP Skipper could make a formidable team. keep up the great work
TheBrownIntruder 1 month ago
@TheBrownIntruder
Yes, these pictures are some of my favorites. The problems with these pictures is that high compression was used after the editing. The manipulation was not done by paintbrush but via "mosaicing". Putting the pieces of the mosaic back in place is undoable. With my software I will hardly be able to re-create the original shapes.
1967sander 1 month ago
@1967sander
thanks for the explanation! A real shame that NASA and the other space agencies have the monopoly.
TheBrownIntruder 1 month ago
Hi Sander,extremely revealing and valuable work.have you ever had an opportunity or the time to review Mars imaging in the same forensic way?keep up the good work
MrSchrodingerscat1 1 month ago
Fascinating. Looking forward to your next.
333kingdom 1 month ago
Long time no see... thank you 1967sander for another great presentation!
These photos are full of surprises, we thank you for enlightening us further, at least we keep consistently knowing the huge lengths NASA went to with their picture manipulation.
I'm looking forward to your next work, see ya!
nerophyte 1 month ago
Good stuff, i always enjoy your videos! I find this kind of subject fascinating. Besides using the software that you use, are there any other ones you would suggest using? Photoshop is probably good for that im not sure, ive never used it that much actually.
Jeedawg 1 month ago
Keep up the great work.
Aqualiteking 1 month ago
Superb ;)
MadarasAdrian 1 month ago 2