The Third Tower [BBC - The Conspiracy Files(part5)

[alphex1000]

There are well over 100 conspiracy theories in the "9/11 Truth Movement". Exactly zero percent of them are true. Each relies entirely on its believers not checking its facts, because with even the smallest amount of research they quickly fall apart. The goal of the "9/11 Debunked" series of videos is to reveal the blatant lies behind these theories, one at a time, in order to save the historical accuracy of 9/11-RKOwens4

[muttkat1]

@COYI1895 By the way the sites I had put down the majority was backed up by facts. Even if I don't agree with somebody's elses opinion, I'll still check out what they have to say and check out their proof.....or sites. It's best to keep an open mind and view the evidence.

[muttkat1]

@COYI1895 How many conspiracy theories were true? People use to say the NWO...global govt was a conspiracy theory & now the UN's agendas have infiltrated down to local govts. Condemnation without investigation is the highest form of ignorance.----Einstein

[muttkat]

In the 911 stuff video I put down below aletter written to the reporter from a certified environmental specialist from the Environmental Assessment Association had 8600 gallons,BTU of 86 million, temps exceeding 3000 degrees, be a very large soil contamination under Title 40 of the Federal Regulation would of reduced that section to a pancake. Wheres the videos from inside the pentagon.

[muttkat]

@LordLewis101 It has been said that people did see a military plane. I think there was a plane painted like an AA pass jet. But if you go to this site and see these pictures you willseeit couldn't of been a jet. dotarchivedotorg/details/rando­m911videos-911stuff. Go down to No. 4.Youwillseean open book on a bar stool,computer monitor,desk and other office stuff right next to the hole. There are no wing marks on the building. Patriots question 911--military part..exper topinion

[muttkat]

Bush was on vacation and was told by an FBI about the probability of a terror attack & ignored the warning. Go to history commons timeline 911 timeline site and see Rumsfeld ignoring the 911 plane crashes after stating at a breakfast meeting that morning that something bad was going to happen & 5 minutes later the 1st plane hit. Between 9;30 and 10 am Rumsfeld couldn't be found. DOD memo dated June 2001 that only authorized him & Bush to shoot down a hijacked plane. How convenient.

[muttkat]

@COYI1895 read the Created Constitutional Crisis Ralph Epperson as to why 911 was preplanned, Truth & Lies video with Michael Ruppert with backup proof & 911 The Third Truth with Dimitri Khalesov should shed some light on this subject.

[muttkat]

@LordLewis101 If the govt has nothing to hide why would they confiscate 84 tapes of the Pentagon and release a tape that has missing frames? i answered your question up at the top. I just saw your name on this page after I put my reply.

[muttkat]

When this video is interviewing Mark of Demolitions Inc he's not lying about explosives being preplanted but he's not telling us that his company has a small nuclear demolitions patent either. Read the Created Constitutional Crisis by Ralph Epperson as to why. 911 The Third Truth Dimitri Khalesov. The year 2000 marks a turning point toward a New World Order---Bush sr at the UN, 1990, He seemed to know something 10 years before. Put 2 and 2 together.

[muttkat]

The reason this video help me prove that 911 was planned is because the man Mark Larzeau of Demolitions Inc company has a patent for small nuclear demolitions of skyscrapers. Becauseofthesize&strength of the WTC ordinary demolitions won't work. I researched this company & they do nuclear demolitions with some other company. Dimitri Khalesov states this & if it was to be false then Demolitions Inc should be suing him for slander. The Sears bldg,the UN&some jap skyscraperssupposehavethisfeat­ure.

[muttkat]

These BBC video helped me prove that 911 was an inside job but I have to get back on this.

[terrymanning1]

Gage you twat. No smoke without fire you disgusting lying bastard.

[cgletts]

surprisingly well rounded documentary BBC. VERY surprisingly to see both sides presented. Its kinda sad watching some cling to the official story like a child a blanket

[imalwayswatchingu00]

@cgletts I too was surprised to see both sides of the story, was thinking that this whole time, I bet it's not the full side though, there'a always a bias.

[muttkat1]

@cgletts It's kinda sad when there have been so many lies & discrepencies brought forward by witnesses who have proved the govt's involvement.

[Nick4700]

They say they found the tapes but never show them? Why not show us them if you actually have? Rather they say don't worry we found them, lets move on. Bull shit

[muttkat]

@Nick4700 Go to the site I put for lord lewis above ...4 and you will see proof that a plane didn;'t hit the Pentagon. You should know theres too many discrepensies in the official govt story.

[RavenPrecept]

Heres a man who does not believe it was a controlled demolition who says it fell in 7 seconds. I have spent many ages arguing with someone who said it fell in 21 seconds as if 7 seconds was admitting controlled demolition.

[moonsugar1]

"I didnt take anything out of context. I just took what someone else hinted towards and proved something that was only ever implied, but in truth had no real evidence to support it."

Thats called taking something out of context you little prick. And wearing a shirt that says 'truther.'

What an asshole.

[RavenPrecept]

@moonsugar1 Well he said there were dead bodies. I don't know if there were or were not. Neither does the BBC. However the BBC are quite happy to interpret what Barry Jennings says about the explosions and collapse. They were free to do this because by that time Barry was reported dead. The BBC had all the info and they chose to 'balance' it the way they liked it. Using an interview but leaving stuff out and making out the person said something different shows me what liers the BBC are.

[moonsugar1]

@RavenPrecept I dont wanna go into whether there were dead bodies or not, as whether we like it or not unfortunatley its always going to be speculation. But what you said about the BBC is exactly the point I was making about loose change, they did exactly the same thing, cherry picked what they wanted from the interview and put it out there. Anyhoo, glad you checked out the link ;)

[RavenPrecept]

@moonsugar1 I suppose you have to cherry pick when making a documentary. Without some sort of selection and focus the film would be about everything and nothing. However it was the way the BBC could not let Barry speak for himself, they had to narrate between his words to tell you the opposite of what he was saying. The closest I have seen in loose change was edit a rambling interview with Larry Silverstien so he said I gave the order to pull and then we watched the building come down.

[RavenPrecept]

@moonsugar1 Any sort of film making is story telling, not reality. The question is are they telling a true story?

[riffiazina]

Check out bush caught lying about september 11th

[MarkB1ngham]

FFS weirdo the smoke at 1:35 is fireless it is going out horizontally , heat rises.  To think my TV licence money pays to keep the real 911 criminals from justice!! what about the BBC charter for balanced reporting?

[DECIMUS771]

What year was this doc made does anyone know?

[j0ltc0lajunki3]

@DECIMUS771 April 13, 2005

11 December 2005

(2nd Edition)

June 2006 (Recut)

11 November 2007

(Final Cut)

22 September 2009 (American Coup)

[DECIMUS771]

@j0ltc0lajunki3 NO dude! This BBC propaganda that I filthied my brain with not so long ago. I can't even remember why it was important!n lol. I'll have to watch it again. Thanks though at least you answered, much respect. Final cuts my favorite. Hands down.

[Clarrisani]

Oh for god sake, Gage, You can clearly see that the smoke is from building 7. Gage is damaging his credibility more and more. He should be looking at the real evidence, not the fictional evidence in his mind.

"dismissed at the end as nothing important." Nope, just explained logically using the evidence present. What was dismissed was the conspiracy claims.

I feel for the poor people the Truthers take out of context. They're treated like criminals. It's not fair on them and their families.

[ctrackmonger]

Yea he saw fire and debris coming out of the building, the problem is we saw fire and extreme damage from, with debris on the DB, WTC 4,5, and 6... There is a problem with this here!!!